0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
53 visualizzazioni1 pagina
good day, attentive and affectionate greeting,
In a very respectful way I want to make the following precisions in this regard:
1. First of all, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Mrs. Linda Breg and Melissa Watson, who have diligently advised me by resolving my concerns, received the complaint, supporting evidence, requested clarifications, and everything related to presenting them before the Committee. Protest. I think the CFA service in this matter I can say has been very effective.
2. I want to clarify, that at no time I am accusing the CFA entity, of negligence or bad performance of the service, nor have I said that because of you (CFA), I did the business with Ruggeri, I am absolutely responsible for having I decided freely and voluntarily to make the sale with MOONCHARM CATTERY.
3. It is true that until the month of April 2017, it instituted a complaint against Mrs. Lucia Ruggeri, sending the corresponding attachments or proofs that supported the narration of the facts and factual grounds of the complaint.
4. I never put an email address erroneously or wrongly about LUCIA RUGGERI, I suppose that the CFA Enitdad, has all the contact information of its members and affiliates such as: email, address, city country, state or department, email, web pages among others, or just by checking the website of MOONCHARM CATTERY to find all correspondence data to contact LUCIA RUGGERI, I think I can not be held responsible for this confusion I repeat; I suppose that the CFA Entity must have updated the contact information of its members in order to be sent pedigrees, certificates and other documents of the association.
I can say with total security that; In my writings and documents sent on the complaint of LUCIA RUGGERI correctly provide the contact information, but well this is a matter that no longer matters simply I think we are all human beings and we can make mistakes at any time.
5. with respect to the statement to the public opinion; and I want everyone to know that the person who started with a smear campaign and public complaints on social networks was Mrs. LUCIA RUGGERI, as she herself put it in the case protest 17-034, and revise APPENDIX 6 pages c-21 and c-22; a statement to the public opinion of Mr. FERNANDO MORENO breeder of DSONNANS CATTERY to whom LUCIA RUGGERI has sold more than 10 Persian cats, I believe that we are all free to express ourselves in social networks, as long as this is done in a respectful manner, of equal form I annex, please see ANNEX 11 - pages 36, 37, 38, 39 (see document dated: 14-Nov-2017) where LUCIA RUGGERI spoke on social networks about the case that I denounce 17-027, This is an issue that has already gone around the world, breeders of all nationalities and all continents have seen and pronounced on this matter, since the month of April 2017.
Of course I issued a press release, giving information to the public opinion of what has happened so far very briefly, my reputation and my honor as a person has been questioned on this issue.
6. When I say that I have waited almost 4 years, it is because it is true, if the matter is reviewed, you can verify that in the month of October 2014 I made the consignment for the value described in Annex 01 see page 11 (document of date: 14-Nov-2017). if we count the dates exactly: to October 2015: one (01) year, to October 2016 two (02) years, to October 2017 three (03) years, to October 2014: four (04) years, long wait, I know that you until last year (2017) were informed of the matter, resolving the lawsuit by judgment of December 12, 2017 (17-027), and that it will be decided again and definitely the next month of June 2018. I think that as a breeder, as a person, as a human being, as a worker, I manifest the feeling, the feeling that overwhelms me about the decision that Lucia Ruggeri adopted when appealing the first instance ruling, which means for me that the process will be dilute and take more time my long wait,
good day, attentive and affectionate greeting,
In a very respectful way I want to make the following precisions in this regard:
1. First of all, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Mrs. Linda Breg and Melissa Watson, who have diligently advised me by resolving my concerns, received the complaint, supporting evidence, requested clarifications, and everything related to presenting them before the Committee. Protest. I think the CFA service in this matter I can say has been very effective.
2. I want to clarify, that at no time I am accusing the CFA entity, of negligence or bad performance of the service, nor have I said that because of you (CFA), I did the business with Ruggeri, I am absolutely responsible for having I decided freely and voluntarily to make the sale with MOONCHARM CATTERY.
3. It is true that until the month of April 2017, it instituted a complaint against Mrs. Lucia Ruggeri, sending the corresponding attachments or proofs that supported the narration of the facts and factual grounds of the complaint.
4. I never put an email address erroneously or wrongly about LUCIA RUGGERI, I suppose that the CFA Enitdad, has all the contact information of its members and affiliates such as: email, address, city country, state or department, email, web pages among others, or just by checking the website of MOONCHARM CATTERY to find all correspondence data to contact LUCIA RUGGERI, I think I can not be held responsible for this confusion I repeat; I suppose that the CFA Entity must have updated the contact information of its members in order to be sent pedigrees, certificates and other documents of the association.
I can say with total security that; In my writings and documents sent on the complaint of LUCIA RUGGERI correctly provide the contact information, but well this is a matter that no longer matters simply I think we are all human beings and we can make mistakes at any time.
5. with respect to the statement to the public opinion; and I want everyone to know that the person who started with a smear campaign and public complaints on social networks was Mrs. LUCIA RUGGERI, as she herself put it in the case protest 17-034, and revise APPENDIX 6 pages c-21 and c-22; a statement to the public opinion of Mr. FERNANDO MORENO breeder of DSONNANS CATTERY to whom LUCIA RUGGERI has sold more than 10 Persian cats, I believe that we are all free to express ourselves in social networks, as long as this is done in a respectful manner, of equal form I annex, please see ANNEX 11 - pages 36, 37, 38, 39 (see document dated: 14-Nov-2017) where LUCIA RUGGERI spoke on social networks about the case that I denounce 17-027, This is an issue that has already gone around the world, breeders of all nationalities and all continents have seen and pronounced on this matter, since the month of April 2017.
Of course I issued a press release, giving information to the public opinion of what has happened so far very briefly, my reputation and my honor as a person has been questioned on this issue.
6. When I say that I have waited almost 4 years, it is because it is true, if the matter is reviewed, you can verify that in the month of October 2014 I made the consignment for the value described in Annex 01 see page 11 (document of date: 14-Nov-2017). if we count the dates exactly: to October 2015: one (01) year, to October 2016 two (02) years, to October 2017 three (03) years, to October 2014: four (04) years, long wait, I know that you until last year (2017) were informed of the matter, resolving the lawsuit by judgment of December 12, 2017 (17-027), and that it will be decided again and definitely the next month of June 2018. I think that as a breeder, as a person, as a human being, as a worker, I manifest the feeling, the feeling that overwhelms me about the decision that Lucia Ruggeri adopted when appealing the first instance ruling, which means for me that the process will be dilute and take more time my long wait,
good day, attentive and affectionate greeting,
In a very respectful way I want to make the following precisions in this regard:
1. First of all, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Mrs. Linda Breg and Melissa Watson, who have diligently advised me by resolving my concerns, received the complaint, supporting evidence, requested clarifications, and everything related to presenting them before the Committee. Protest. I think the CFA service in this matter I can say has been very effective.
2. I want to clarify, that at no time I am accusing the CFA entity, of negligence or bad performance of the service, nor have I said that because of you (CFA), I did the business with Ruggeri, I am absolutely responsible for having I decided freely and voluntarily to make the sale with MOONCHARM CATTERY.
3. It is true that until the month of April 2017, it instituted a complaint against Mrs. Lucia Ruggeri, sending the corresponding attachments or proofs that supported the narration of the facts and factual grounds of the complaint.
4. I never put an email address erroneously or wrongly about LUCIA RUGGERI, I suppose that the CFA Enitdad, has all the contact information of its members and affiliates such as: email, address, city country, state or department, email, web pages among others, or just by checking the website of MOONCHARM CATTERY to find all correspondence data to contact LUCIA RUGGERI, I think I can not be held responsible for this confusion I repeat; I suppose that the CFA Entity must have updated the contact information of its members in order to be sent pedigrees, certificates and other documents of the association.
I can say with total security that; In my writings and documents sent on the complaint of LUCIA RUGGERI correctly provide the contact information, but well this is a matter that no longer matters simply I think we are all human beings and we can make mistakes at any time.
5. with respect to the statement to the public opinion; and I want everyone to know that the person who started with a smear campaign and public complaints on social networks was Mrs. LUCIA RUGGERI, as she herself put it in the case protest 17-034, and revise APPENDIX 6 pages c-21 and c-22; a statement to the public opinion of Mr. FERNANDO MORENO breeder of DSONNANS CATTERY to whom LUCIA RUGGERI has sold more than 10 Persian cats, I believe that we are all free to express ourselves in social networks, as long as this is done in a respectful manner, of equal form I annex, please see ANNEX 11 - pages 36, 37, 38, 39 (see document dated: 14-Nov-2017) where LUCIA RUGGERI spoke on social networks about the case that I denounce 17-027, This is an issue that has already gone around the world, breeders of all nationalities and all continents have seen and pronounced on this matter, since the month of April 2017.
Of course I issued a press release, giving information to the public opinion of what has happened so far very briefly, my reputation and my honor as a person has been questioned on this issue.
6. When I say that I have waited almost 4 years, it is because it is true, if the matter is reviewed, you can verify that in the month of October 2014 I made the consignment for the value described in Annex 01 see page 11 (document of date: 14-Nov-2017). if we count the dates exactly: to October 2015: one (01) year, to October 2016 two (02) years, to October 2017 three (03) years, to October 2014: four (04) years, long wait, I know that you until last year (2017) were informed of the matter, resolving the lawsuit by judgment of December 12, 2017 (17-027), and that it will be decided again and definitely the next month of June 2018. I think that as a breeder, as a person, as a human being, as a worker, I manifest the feeling, the feeling that overwhelms me about the decision that Lucia Ruggeri adopted when appealing the first instance ruling, which means for me that the process will be dilute and take more time my long wait,
Anny! Ebenezer Cats esta con Penni Pariwalex Richter y 3
personas mas
COMMUNIQUE TO PUBLIC OPINION
Well what is promised is a debt with areat grief | must inform the public
about the complaint published on social networks last Apri 2017, about the
Ease of the Persian eat: PARTIWAI JELLY BELLY, in previous days more
exactly on December 12, 2017 the Board of Directors of the GFA (The Cat
Fanciers’ Association), plead guilty to vrs. LUCIA RUGGER! - Breeder and
Owner of #MOON CHARM CATTERY, the Protest Committee of the same.
entity, investigated the evidence provided By the undersigned complainant,
2 Wall as the allegations and false evidence presented by Mrs) RUGGERI
the Committee like the Board, LUCIA RUGGERI was found guilty, and in the
tonor of the pronouncement GFA doicidie thus (seo page 01).
(_) Lucia Ruager guilly of the following violation (2). CEA Constitution
artic XV, section 4 Cb) The board has decided that the following
disciplinary action will be imposed: respondent be found guilty and ordered
to make restitution to the sum of € 2,032 03 and pay a fine of $ 500.00 to
GFA. both the fine and restitution to be paid within 30 days, of Lucia Rugaert
shall ba suspended trom all CPA services until both are paid in full. ()
Despite the social pressure, the many requests and prayers sent te this lady
(RUGGERD on our part, all the evidence that shows inappropriate and
Indolent behavior, and finally the CFA Board Decision, the Mre. LUCIA
RUGGER! continues resisting and opposing to answer for her actions. who
appealed the decisian before the same Board who already taund her guilty
before such coherent and obvious denunciation, situation that will be
definitively resolved in the month of June of this year (2018)
In this respect, as a Vicum in this matter, lexpress that |am very satistied
that the Protest Committee and the Board of Directors (The Gat Fanciers"
Association), unanimously, they will be pronounced by judamont of
return of the money to our affected nursery, | thank very much the voices of
that supported ihe tests subscribed by (rue university professionals
(Veterinary Doctors), unlike Ruggeri who in a cynical way | provide evidence
evidently manipulated such as the testimonies of the Breeders that you will
find in the links where you Can consult the documents of the process.
instituted against MOONCHARM CATTERY,
Next April 24, 2018, PARTIWA! JELLY BELLY will be one year dead by
medical authorization (euthanasia), although it is presumed that the true
PARTI WAI JELLY BELLY died long before Lucia Ruggeri died and the cat
that was sent is not the real one Jelly Belly, the truth is only known by the
condemned
Since 2014 we have been waiting for almost 3 years for a healthy cat
Suitable for reproduction in order to expand our cattery or the return of
money, 2 situation that will Be decided and is in the hands of God and the
Board of GFA who will issue a ruling in Second instance
As Christians we claim this word: Jeremiah 1:19 (NKJV) 19; And they wall
fight against you, but they will not defeat you; because | am with you, says
Jehovah, to deliver you
Ing. ANDRES FELIPE NINO SOLANO
Villavicencio, Meta, Colombia, January 11, 2018
Linke about the documents consult them by clicking here;
1-) Acceptance of the complaint and opening letter: https-/ies scribd. com/./
/Gaso-Lucia-Ruggeri-GFA-17-027-0714,
2.) Extension of the complaint against LUCIA RUGGERI
https //es. seribd.com/._./Amplliacion-Denuncia-Anto-Cfa-Andres..
3-) Failure and conviction of the GFA: https://es.scribd.com/.../Judgment-17-
027 TRL-CFA-LUCIA-RUGGERI
4-) Allegations and defense of Lucia Ruggeri: Nttps://es scrba coms,
1368580704/Allegations-17-0271-1-Luc.
5.) Euthanasia copy of PARTI WAI JELLY BELLY,
https /7es. scribd .com/document/36897 1478/Gepy-Euthanasia
6.) Counterclaim filed by Lucia Ruggeri: https //es scribd. com/,
Contrademanda Lucia Rugger-17-027R,
ee —