0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
62 visualizzazioni1 pagina
A tender of the proper amount owed, even if rejected, can extinguish a lien and prevent foreclosure. According to the document, courts have held that a tender only needs to include the principal amount, not interest, if the note charges a usurious interest rate that the creditor is not legally entitled to receive. In those cases, a tender of just the principal is sufficient to preclude foreclosure.
A tender of the proper amount owed, even if rejected, can extinguish a lien and prevent foreclosure. According to the document, courts have held that a tender only needs to include the principal amount, not interest, if the note charges a usurious interest rate that the creditor is not legally entitled to receive. In those cases, a tender of just the principal is sufficient to preclude foreclosure.
A tender of the proper amount owed, even if rejected, can extinguish a lien and prevent foreclosure. According to the document, courts have held that a tender only needs to include the principal amount, not interest, if the note charges a usurious interest rate that the creditor is not legally entitled to receive. In those cases, a tender of just the principal is sufficient to preclude foreclosure.
A tender of the proper amount due, even if rejected,
extinguishes the lien and precludes foreclosure* ( See, e.g. Winnett v.
Roberts, supra, 179 Cal App.3d 909, 902; Lichtv v. Whitney, supra, 80 Cal. App.2d 696, 701; see also Code Civ. Proc. SS 2074.) In Winnett the court held that a tender of the principal amount without interest was sufficient because the note was usurious and the creditor was not entitled to receive interest.