Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
net/publication/262639581
CITATIONS READS
2 88
4 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Investigation on the behavior and performance of wire rope isolators View project
ASR suppression using fine, medium and ultrafine POFA treated at various elevated temperatures View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Muhammad Ekhlasur Rahman on 04 September 2014.
1107
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 73 2013
Coarse Aggregate age) before testing. The container was closed by lid to prevent
Coarse aggregates composed of granite and crushed the ammonia gas produced by reaction of ammonium nitrate
sandstone within the range of 10 mm to 14 mm. Physical and calcium hydroxide to be evaporated in the air. To
properties of the coarse aggregates are given in the TABLE I. determine the durability properties, tests conducted were water
absorption, volume of permeable voids (VPV) and sorptivity
Fine Aggregates test. Other tests such as compressive strength test, pH
The size of river sand ranged from 75 μm to 4.75 mm. It measurement and degradation depth measurement were also
was dried in a shielded place for a week. Then, it was sieved determined.
to find the fineness modulus. Physical properties of the fine
aggregates are given in TABLE I. TABLE II
MIX PROPORTION OF CONCRETE TYPE G50 AND G60
Fly Ash
Concrete Type G50 G60
Fly ash used in this research to improve the workability and
ultimate strength of concrete. It also used to improve Cement (kg/m3) 500 440
resistance to sulphate attack and reduce permeability. Fly Ash (kg/m3) - 71.5
Silica Fume Silica Fume
30 38.5
(kg/m3)
Silica fume also added in concrete to produce high strength,
River Sand
dense and durable concrete. 500 312
(kg/m3)
Crushed
Superplasticizer - 220
Sandstone (kg/m3)
Superplasticizer was added to increase the strength of Granite (kg/m3) 1140 1056
concrete. It is a water-reducing admixture which facilitates
work with concrete of low w/c ratio. It is also used to Water (kg/m3) 186 165
eliminate segregation of concrete and allow good dispersion of S.P (%) 1.67 1.67
cement particles in water, accelerating the rate of hydration
[8].
III. TEST RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
TABLE I
PROPERTIES OF COARSE AND FINE AGGREGATES A. Compressive Strength Test
Characteristics Granite
Crushed
River Sand
The testing procedure is complied with BS 1881: Part 116:
Sandstone 1983 [9]. The results for the compressive strength test are
10mm to 75μm to
Size Range
14mm
10mm
4.75mm
shown in Fig. 1. The compressive strength decreased when the
Fineness concrete was treated with ammonium nitrate solution. For
- - 2.18
Modulus concrete type G50, the strength decreased to 42.71 N/mm2 at
Moisture Content 0% 1.27% 0% the age of 56 days whereby there was a difference of 24.91%
in strength compared to the concrete cured in water at the
Specific Gravity 2.80 2.62 2.74 same age. It continued to decrease until 30.88 N/mm2 at the
age of 90 days, leading to a difference of 47.44% compared to
B. Concrete Sample Preparations
those immersed in water. For concrete type G60 treated with
The mix proportions were prepared as in TABLE II. The ammonium nitrate solution, the strength decreased from 51.11
mixer was pre-damped with water. Half of the coarse N/mm2 at the age of 56 days to 38.28 N/mm2 at the age of 90
aggregate was added and then followed by fine aggregate and days. The percentage of difference in strength between
finally the remaining coarse aggregate by spreading them concrete treated with ammonium nitrate solution and water at
evenly over the pan and the mixer was operated for 30 second. the age of 56 days was about 22.48% while for concrete at the
After that, half of the water is mixed for 1 minute. The age of 90 days, the difference in strength was 42.06%. The
cement, silica fume and fly ash were added in an even layer loss of strength for concrete type G60 was less than concrete
over the aggregate. The mixture was then mixed for 1 minute. type G50 after leaching by ammonium nitrate solution,
Finally, the remaining water and superplasticizer were added indicating that concrete type G50 was more susceptible to
and mixed uniformly to produce concrete grade 50 and 60. damages done by ammonium nitrate solution compared to
The concrete was then placed in the cube mould in three layers concrete type G60.
and each layer was compacted by using vibrating table. The Based on the research of Carde and Francois [10], the loss
concrete specimens were left undisturbed for 24 hours and of strength was essentially due to the removal of calcium
then demoulded. The specimens were cured for 3, 7, 28, 56, hydroxide during the leaching process by ammonium nitrate
and 90 days respectively in the water tank for normal curing solution. Calcium hydroxide is the hydration product which
method. replaces the space occupied by cement and water during
After 28 days curing of specimens, some of the specimens hydration process. The calcium hydroxide reacts with
were partially immersed in ammonium nitrate solution with ammonium nitrate yielding calcium nitrate and ammonia
concentration of 20% until 56 day and 90 day (include curing
1108
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 73 2013
1109
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 73 2013
1110
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 73 2013
[4] Lea, F.M. 196 65. The action of aammonium salts on concrete. Maggazine of
Concrete Reseearch 17(52): 1155-116.
[5] Maltais, Y., Samson, E. & Maarchand, J. 2004. Predicting the durability
d
of Portland Cement
C systems in aggressive environments:
e laaboratory
validation. Cemment and Concreete Research 34(9 9): 1579–1589.
[6] Barr, B.I.G. 2003. Failure of concrete sttructures. Cardiiff, UK:
University of Wales.
W
[7] ASTM C150 0/C150M – 11 “Standard Speecification for Portland
Cement.”
[8] Shan Somayajji. 2001. Civil Enggineering Materiials-Second Editiion. New
Jersey: Prenticce Hall.
[9] BS 1881: Part P 116:1983. 1983. Method for Determinaation of
Compressive Strength of Conncrete Cubes. Lo ondon: British Standards
S
Institution.
0]
[10 Carde, C. & Francois,
F R. 19997 (a). Aging daamage model of concrete
Fig. 5 Graph
h of degradationn depth versus square
s root of tiime behavior durring the leachin ng process. Materials
Ma and sttructures
constructions 30: 465-472.
According to t Nguyen eet al. [20], the leaching g depth [11
1] ASTM C642. 2002. Standard T Test Method for Density, Absorpttion, and
Voids in Hard dened Concrete. Annual Book off ASTM Standardds 2002,
in
ncreased with h leaching du uration. Schneeider and Ch hen [2] 04.02. Philadeelphia: American Society for Testiing and Materials.
fo
ound out that the degradatiion depth dep pended on thee initial [12
2] Agostini, F., Lafhaj, Z., Skkoczylas, F. & Loodsveldt, H. H 2007.
strrength of the specimens. Concrete
C with
h higher strenggth had Experimental study of acceleerated leaching on hollow cylin nders of
mortar. Cemennt and Concrete R Research 37: 71-7 78.
lo
ower value of coefficient k. Based on n this researrch, the [13
3] Yang, H., Jiaang L., Zhang Y Y., Pu, Q., Xu, Y. 2012. Prediccting the
co
ompressive strrength at the age of 28 daays for concreete type calcium leachiing behavior of ccement pastes in aggressive
a enviroonments.
2
G is 52.67 N/mm
G50 N while concrete
c type G60 recorded d 62.01 a Building Matterials 29: 88-96..
Construction and
N
N/mm 2
. The deegradation dep
pth of concrette type G60 is 0.067 [14
4] Jain, J., & Neiithalath, N. 2009.. Analysis of calccium leaching beh havior of
plain and mod dified cement paastes in pure waater. Cement & Concrete
C
X square root ofo time while concrete typee G50 recorded d 0.077 Composites 31 1: 176-185.
X square root of time. It shhows that con ncrete type G60
G had [15
5] Dias, W.P.S. 1995. Sorptivity Testing for Assessing Concrete Quality.
lo
ower value off coefficient k than concrrete type G50. This Proc. Int. Conf.
C on Concreete under Severre Exposure Coonditions
(CONSEC '95). Spon, London.. Pp. 433-442.
in
ndicates that concrete typee G50 was more m suscepttible to [16
6] Chan, SYN. anda Ji X. 1998. W Water sorptivity an nd chloride diffu
usivity of
deegradation cau used by amm monium nitratee solution compared oil shale ash concrete. Construcct Build Mater 12 2(4): 177-183.
to
o concrete typee G60. [17
7] Haga, K., Suttou, S., Hironagaa, M., Tanaka, S. S & Nagasaki, S. 2005.
Effect of poro osity on leachingg of Ca from harrdened ordinary portland
cement paste. Cement and Concrete Research 35: 1764-1775.
IV. CONCLUSION [18
8] Geotechnical Engineering B Bureau. 2007. Test Method for the
determination of pH value of w water or soil by pH H meter. New Yo ork State
Based on the experim mental resullts, the folllowing Department off Transportation.
co
onclusions weere made: [19
9] Kamali, S., Gerard, B. & Morranville, M. 2003 3. Modelling the leaching
1)) Concrete type
t G60 perfforms better annd is less suscceptible kinetics of cement-based m materials: Influeence of materials and
environment. Cement
C and Conccrete Compositess 25: 451-458.
to damage compared to concrete typee G50 when leached l [20
0] Nguyen, V. H.,H Colina, H., T Torrenti, J.M., Boulay,
B C. & Needjar, B.
by ammoniium nitrate soolution. 2007. Chemo mechanical couppling behavior off leached concrette part I:
2)) The loss off strength of cconcrete type G60 is less thhan that Experimental results.
r Nuclear EEngineering and Design 237: 2083-2089.
of concretee type G50 aftter immersed ini ammonium m nitrate
solution for a certain perriod.
3)) After the leaching proccess, the durability properrties of
concrete tyype G60 was higher than thatt of concreete type
G50.
4)) The pH measurement
m shows that the
t reduction in pH
values forr concrete ty ype G60 is lower than that of
concrete type
t G50 w when they were subjeccted to
immersion in ammoniuum nitrate so olution for different
d
immersion time.
5)) The rate of degraded deepth for concrrete type G60 0 is less
than that off concrete typpe G50.
REFFERENCES
[1]] British Standards Institution. 1997. Structural Use of Concrete, Code of
Practice for Design
D and Consttruction. BS8110
0. BSI, London. Pp.
P 122.
[2]] Schneider, U.
U & Chen, S.-W W. 1999. Behav vior of high-performance
concrete (HPPC) under ammonium nitrate solu ution and sustain
ned load.
America Concrete Institute, AC CI Materials Jourrnal 96(1): 47-51
1.
[3]] Ukraincik, V.., Bjegovic, D. & Djurekovic, A. 1978. Concrete corrosion
in a nitrogen n fertilizer plan
nt. In Peter J. Sereda
S & G. G.G Litvan.
Durability off Building Materials and Compon nents: Proceedinngs of the
First Internattional Conferencee. Ottawa, Canada. Pp. 397-409.
1111