Sei sulla pagina 1di 1

OPTION CONTRACT RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL

Pertinent cases: Pertinent cases:


• Ang Yu vs. CA (en banc) • Equatorial Realty vs. Mayfair
• PNOC vs. Keppel • Ang Yu vs. CA
• Sanchez vs. Rigos • Rosencor vs. Inquing
• Vasquez vs. CA
• Carceller vs. CA

Must have all three (3) requisites for Subject Matter


and four (4) requisites for Price

In an option contract, the first thing to look at is In a right of first refusal, the first thing to look at is
whether or not there is a separate whether or not it is a part of a contract.
consideration.

(1) No separate consideration (1) Part of a contract


• Withdraw before acceptance or if an • Remedies in case of breach:
acceptance has been made, before the o Rescission of the sale between
offeror knows of such fact by the grantor and the third-party
communicating withdrawal to offeree buyer (results to restitution)
• Liability only attaches when withdrawn o Specific performance against the
arbitrarily owner (to sell it to you under the
o Damages – Art. 19 CC same terms), only if it is an
obligation to give
Exericse of option can result to either a contract o (Technically, there would be
to sell or contract of sale DEPENDING on the damages in either case – Art.
wording of the contract 1191)
• PNOC vs. Keppel: An option unsupported
by a separate consideration stands as an Exception: No rescission when the third-party was
unaccepted offer to buy (or to sell) which, in good faith (Rosencor vs. Inquing)
when properly accepted, ripens into a • Only damages against the grantor of the
contract to sell. right of first refusal
(2) With separate consideration (2) Not part of a contract
• Withdrawal during option period -> breach • If there is a separate consideration
of contract o Treat it as if it is part of a contract;
• Remedies in case of breach see (1) (Note: Atty. Gulapa said
o Damages, because of a breach of this is only an 8/10 answer)
contract (Ang Yu vs. CA) o “I give that you may do”
o Specific Performance – if an • If there is no separate consideration
obligation to give (Carceller vs. o Remedy in case of breach:
CA) § Damages – Art. 19 CC
§ Inspect the wording of (Ang Yu vs. CA)
the contract. If it is an
obligation to do, there can
be no specific
performance.

* According to Atty. Gulapa

Potrebbero piacerti anche