Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
POSTGRADUATE
SCHOOL
MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA
THESIS
DESIGN A TRACKING SYSTEM WITH SINGLE
CHANNEL RSNS AND MONOPULSE DIGITAL
BEAMFORMING
By
ShihYuan Yeh
December 2010
11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy
or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S. Government. IRB Protocol number ________________.
12a. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE
Distribution Statement
13. ABSTRACT (maximum 200 words)
Insert abstract here.
14. SUBJECT TERMS Phase Array, FM Modulation, RSNS, Tracking, Digital Beamforming 15. NUMBER OF
PAGES
69
16. PRICE CODE
17. SECURITY 18. SECURITY 19. SECURITY 20. LIMITATION OF
CLASSIFICATION OF CLASSIFICATION OF THIS CLASSIFICATION OF ABSTRACT
REPORT PAGE ABSTRACT
Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified UU
NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89)
Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239-18
i
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
ii
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited
ShihYuan Yeh
Major, Taiwanese Army
B.S., Taiwanese National Defense University, 2001
from the
Roberto Cristi
Thesis Co-Advisor
R. Clark Robertson
Chairman, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
iii
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
iv
ABSTRACT
v
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I.INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................1
A. BACKGROUND...............................................................................................1
B. PREVIOUS WORK..........................................................................................2
C. SCOPE OF RESEARCH..................................................................................3
D. THESIS OUTLINE...........................................................................................4
II.DIRECTION FINDING AND ROBUST SYMMETRIC NUMERIC SYSTEM.....6
A.DIRECTION FINDING....................................................................................6
B. AMBIGUITY AND FOLDING WAVEFORMS............................................9
1. Ambiguity.............................................................................................10
2. Folding Waveforms..............................................................................12
C. QUADRATURE DEMODULATION...........................................................14
1. Signal Modulation................................................................................14
2. Quadrature Demodulation..................................................................15
D. ROBUST SYMMETRIC NUMERIC SYSTEM THEORY........................17
1. Parameters Define................................................................................17
2. Interferometer Design.........................................................................19
III. TRACKING RADARS AND TECHNIQUES........................................................22
A. TYPES OF TRACKING RADAR SYSTEM...............................................22
1. Single-Target Tracker (STT)..............................................................23
2. Automatic Detection and Track (ADT).............................................23
3. Phased Array Radar Tracking...........................................................24
4. Track While Scan (TWS)....................................................................25
B. ANGLE TRACKING TECHNIQUES..........................................................25
1. Conical Scan.........................................................................................25
2. Sequential Lobing................................................................................25
3. Monopulse Tracking............................................................................26
a. Amplitude Comparison Monopulse.........................................26
b. Phase Comparison Monopulse................................................26
C. TRACKING ACCURACY.............................................................................26
1. Theoretical Angular Accuracy............................................................26
2. Limitations to Tracking Accuracy.....................................................26
a. Glint...........................................................................................26
b. Receiver Noise...........................................................................26
c. Amplitude Fluctuations............................................................26
d. Servo Noise...............................................................................26
IV. SINGLE CHANNEL RSNS COMPUTER SIMULATION AND HARDWARE
TESTING RESULTS..........................................................................................28
A.SINGLE CHANNEL RSNS DESIGN............................................................28
B. CALIBRATION..............................................................................................28
C. HARDWARE SETUP.....................................................................................28
vii
D. RSNS IN LABVIEW.......................................................................................28
E. MATLAB SIMULATION..............................................................................28
F. COMPARISON AND RESULTS..................................................................36
V. TRACKING WITH SINGLE CHANNEL RSNS AND MONOPULSE DIGITAL
BEAMFORMING TESTING RESULTS..........................................................38
A. ANECHOIC CHAMBER...............................................................................38
B. HARDWARE SETUP.....................................................................................38
C. TRACKING PROGRAM IN LABVIEW.....................................................38
D. COMPARISON AND RESULTS..................................................................38
VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS..................................................40
A. CONCLUSIONS.............................................................................................40
B. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE WORK.......................................40
LIST OF REFERENCES................................................................................................42
INITIAL DISTRIBUTION LIST...................................................................................45
viii
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
ix
LIST OF FIGURES
xi
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
xii
LIST OF TABLES
xiii
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
xiv
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
xv
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
xvi
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
AM Amplitude Modulation
COTS Commercial-of-the-shelf
DC Direct Current
DF Direction Finding
EM Electromagnetic
EW Electronic Warfare
FM Frequency Modulation
G Gain
I In Phase
IC Integrated Circuit
IF Intermediate Frequency
LO Local Oscillator
NF Noise Figure
NI National Instruments
PM Phase Modulation
Q Quadrature Phase
RF Radio Frequency
RX Receiver
TX Transmitter
xviii
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
xix
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
xx
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
xxi
I. INTRODUCTION
A. BACKGROUND
Passive Direction Finding (DF), later chapter mention DF would mean passive
DF, technique has been widely used in variety of fields such as communication,
navigation, Electronic Warfare (EW), Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), radar system
and lots of military applications. It is a method used to receive electromagnetic (EM)
wave which comes from the signal source or target and then use proper DF algorithm to
calculate the Angle of Arrival (AOA). Different DF algorithm can derive different angle
resolution and even use the same algorithm with different parameters could come into
different results. The goal is to use a better DF algorithm to improve angle resolution
accuracy.
DF, also named Electronic Support Measure (ESM), is a method used to derive
angle but not range. Unlike the common radar system that provides range and angle
information from a target. Radar system could use high gain antenna to provide better
angle accuracy but DF could not get any gain benefit from it. Further, with higher range
and angle resolution, it becomes possible to recognize individual targets. Even without
high resolution, DF has been able to recognize and identify a target by its general nature
or behavior in space. Because of its passive receive characteristic, it could not be used on
tracking a target. DF method could cooperate with other tracking systems to provide a
military air-defense radar system [1].
B. PREVIOUS WORK
This thesis is a portion of the ongoing project began by Bartee [3] in 2002. Gezer
[4] followed the project and designed a digital phased array to track UAVs with the use
of Commercial-of-the-shelf (COTS) hardware to lower cost. The design of tracking
system was also verified through the simulations.
Eng [5] built up a calibration station that could automate calculate the DC offset
form the LabView program. It provided an easy way to measure the DC offset from the
modulation boards and it also gave more accuracy than before. The components of the
calibration system were easy to disassemble so it made the upgrade works more easily to
accomplish. By changing different Analog to Digital Converter (ADC) could give better
resolution in the future.
Tan and Pandya [7] carried out the design of a UAV tracking system with the use
of RSNS DF and monopulse Digital Beamforming (DBF). Three different LabView
2
Modules were also developed. They were monopulse beamforming and tracking, NTSC
decoding and Frequency Modulation (FM) Demodulation. The beamforming and tracking
module used RSNS and combined with monopulse DBF to acquire and track a UAV
using the six-element antenna array. The FM demodulation module was tested
successfully for a single channel condition. The NTSC decoding module was able to
decode video signals and display on the LabView console.
C. SCOPE OF RESEARCH
The purpose of this thesis is to design, build and test a single channel RSNS with
monopulse DBF to accurately acquire the AOA from the signal source. Hardware would
be mainly come from COTS components to lower cost. Simulations would be
implemented on Matlab and hardware operate and monitor software would be built up on
LabView.
The first part of my research would illustrate the RSNS algorithms used on DF
and the concern issues when design a DF system. Folding waveforms and ambiguity
would be explained. Followed by the theory explanations, hardware operation would be
implemented. Besides, calibration of the modulation boards would be described shortly.
RSNS DF method would be used to measure AOA and then do comparisons between the
measured value and the true value. Further, analyze the calculated AOA values with the
true AOA values. More, use the derived measured data and put it in different SNRs to see
the effects. Try to find out which SNR values are acceptable for the DF job.
The second part of my research would illustrate the angle tracking techniques and
different types of tracking radar system. Tracking accuracy would also be explained to
better understand the noise effect on the tracking system design. Then a single channel
RSNS with monopulse DBF tracking system would be constructed. The six-element
phased array would be used for the tracker. Measurement would be in the anechoic
chamber to reduce interference and the layout of the anechoic chamber would be
mentioned. The tracking system would use RSNS DF first to find the rough AOA and
then pass the scan angle to the monopulse DBF module to do a better tracking job.
3
System performance would be tested and also use Matlab programs to do the
simulations. Measure values would be compared to the theoretical values to tell the
difference and further more do the analysis. Conclusions would be made to make
following improvement works successful.
D. THESIS OUTLINE
Chapter II illustrates the basic idea of DF and explains the folding waveforms and
ambiguity situation. Furthermore, explains the quadrature demodulation and fundamental
RSNS theory.
Chapter III reviews different types of tracking radar system and include the angle
tracking techniques and tracking accuracy considerations.
Chapter IV provides the single channel RSNS system design set up and includes
Matlab simulations in different SNRs to see the cost and effects. Moreover, covers the
modulation boards calibration and LabView demonstrations.
4
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
5
II. DIRECTION FINDING AND ROBUST SYMMETRIC
NUMERIC SYSTEM
A. DIRECTION FINDING
Radio DF systems use linear phase arrays to measure AOA from the incident
planar EM wave. There are three categories of DF methods: amplitude comparison, phase
delay and time delay [8].
In order to fulfill the comparison works at least two antenna elements are
required, however multiple elements could be used. The antenna is assumed to be
operated in the far field and arrival EM wave is restricted to narrowband frequency.
6
Figure 1. Incident Plane Wave Arrive to Two Element Antennas (After [6])
7
The received Vi signals pass to the quadrature demodulator to do mixing and LPF
processing which would be elaborated more detailed in the quadrature demodulator
section. Signals come out of the demodulator are I1, Q1, I 2 and Q2 and they belong to
Ai = ( Ii ) 2 + ( Qi ) 2
Q
φi = tan −1 i
Ii
where Ai is the amplitude and φi is the phase [9]. Figure 2 shows a more intuitive I/Q
plane relations.
8
On the other hand, if define the origin is in the middle of two antenna elements,
kd kd
the phase value of each element could be given as φ1 = − sin θ and φ2 = sin θ
2 2
2π
where k = . The phase difference could be calculated as
λ
∆φ = φ2 − φ1 = kd sin ( θ ) .
V2
Vout ( φ ) =
cos ( ∆ψ + ∆φ ) .
2
∆ψ comes from the cables are neglected because the cable length are already known and
assumed to be equal. Output voltages, V 2 / 2, are normalized to unity for simplified
purpose. Finally, combine Equations and , the phase folding waveform could be
simplified as
Vout ( φ ) = cos kd sin ( θ ) .
9
1. Ambiguity
d/ λ=0.5
200
150
100
50
∆φ (degrees)
-50
-100
-150
-200
-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100
θ (degrees)
10
Figure 4. Phase difference vs. AOA at d= λ (After [6])
Next, the frequency parameter is also a variable that would cause ambiguity. This
time keeps element distance fixed and equals to 0.5m. By changing frequency to inspect
if there is ambiguity. As figure 5 shows, when frequency equals to 300MHz, there is no
ambiguity arisen.
f=300MHz, d=0.5m (baseline spacing)
200
150
100
50
∆φ (degrees)
-50
-100
-150
-200
-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100
θ (degrees)
11
Adjusting frequency from 300MHz to 900MHz, as figure 6 illustrated, there is
ambiguity. When phase difference equal to -100 degrees, there could be three possible
AOAs.
2. Folding Waveforms
12
d/λ=0.5
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
V out (Normalized)
0.2
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1
-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100
Angle of Arrival (degrees)
Next, increase the baseline distance to see the effect. In figure 8, there are two
folding waveforms when d = λ .
d/λ=1
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
V out (Normalized)
0.2
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1
-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100
Angle of Arrival (degrees)
Finally, increase the baseline distance equals to 2λ . Figure 9 shows there are four
folding waveforms.
13
d/λ=2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
V out (Normalized)
0.2
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1
-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100
Angle of Arrival (degrees)
To sum up, increase the baseline distance will also increase the folding
waveforms. When folding waveform is greater than one, ambiguity would arise
simultaneously.
C. QUADRATURE DEMODULATION
1. Signal Modulation
14
Figure 10. s ( t ) modulates with a sinusoid carrier frequency ωc
First, baseband signals do not propagate far. For example, voice signals could
only be heard in a short range. However, if a voice signal modulates with a higher carrier
frequency, it could be converted to EM waves and transmitted far away such as AM/FM
applications [11].
Third, transmitting frequency should adapt to the physical size of the antenna.
Low frequency signals have long wavelength and large diameter antennas are required.
However, if the physical size of the antenna is too large, it becomes unpractical to use
[7].
2. Quadrature Demodulation
Figure 12. AD8347 Quadrature Demodulator Made by Analog Devices, Inc. (From [10])
u ( t ) = I ( t ) + jQ ( t ) .
The signal s ( t ) could be substituted to
u ( t ) e jωc t + u∗ ( t ) e − jωc t
{
s ( t ) = Re u ( t ) e jωc t
} =
2
.
16
s ( t ) ⋅ cos ( ω LO t ) =
1
4 (
u ( t ) e jωc t + u∗ ( t ) e − jωc t e jωLO t + e− jωLO t
)
u ( t ) j ( ωc +ωLO ) t u ( t ) j ( ωc −ωLO ) t u∗ ( t ) − j ( ωc −ωLO ) t u∗ ( t ) − j ( ωc +ωLO ) t
= e + e + e + e
4 4 4 4
u ( t ) j ( ωc +ωLO ) t u ( t ) j ( ωc −ωLO ) t
= Re e + Re e .
2 2
Next, pass the mix signal through LPF and LO frequency ( ω LO ) equals to ωc . Then the
first term in equation could be eliminated by using a LPF and the second term could be
u ( t ) I ( t )
derived and equal to Re = .
2 2
On the other hand, the quadrature channel of the lower part of figure 11 could be given as
u ( t ) j ( ωc −ωLO ) t u ( t ) j ( ωc +ωLO ) t
s ( t ) ⋅ sin ( ω LO ) = Im e − Im e .
2 2
Using the same method through LPF, and the second part is filtered out. The first term is
u ( t ) Q ( t )
left and equal to Im = .
2 2
The concept of RSNS process is used to reconstruct the folding waveforms out of
the antenna and it could obtain high AOA resolutions without long baseline distance. In
this section, RSNS parameters would be defined first then follows the interferometry
design steps.
1. Parameters Define
The fundamental elements of the RSNS algorithm are the moduli ( mi ) and they
should be greater than zero and relatively primed. The number of moduli depends on the
number of antenna elements and is denoted as N. For example, as figure 1 shows a two
element antenna should have two moduli so N equals to 2.
17
A row vector is defined as
[0,1, 2,..., mi − 1, mi , mi − 1,..., 2,1].
A sequence used to represent the folding waveform is constructed by repeating each
element N times in the row vector. For the ith sequence ( i = 1, 2,..., N ) , it should look like
X mi = [0,
14 0,...,
2 43 0, 0,1,1,...,1,1,...,
14 2 43 mi , mi ,..., mi , mi ,...,1,1,...,1,1].
14 2 43
1 4 4 2 4 43
N N N N
After sequence sets are generated, align them vertically and shift one column per sub-
sequence. Next, define M̂ as the dynamic range which means the maximum column pair
of the shifted sequence set has no repetitions. Table 1 display a more clearly explanation
for m1 = 3 and m2 = 4. In this case, there is no column pair duplicated from column
number 6 to 20 and it’s also the maximum column pairs.
Previous works in [5, 6, 7, 8] found out for some specific two elements cases, dynamic
range could be summarized and calculated as follows:
for m1 ≥ 3 and m2 = m1 + 1,
Mˆ = 3 ( m1 + m2 ) − 6
for m1 ≥ 5 and m2 = m1 + 2,
Mˆ = 3 ( m1 + m2 ) − 7
for m1 ≥ 5 and m2 = m1 + C ( C ≥ 3) ,
Mˆ = 4m1 + 2m2 − 2.
18
2. Interferometer Design
Before proceed to the interferometer design, there is one thing has to be clarified.
RSNS algorithm is used to reconstruct the virtual folding waveform of each channel so
everything inside the RSNS block is virtual. There are several steps needed to implement
a RSNS interferometer system.
The first one is to calculate the number of folds for each moduli which are given
as
Mˆ
ni = .
2 Nmi
With the ni information, then the corresponding virtual element baseline distance could
be derived. By substitute equation into equation, a new equation could be given as
λ Mˆ λ
di = ni = .
2 4 Nmi
Another issue need to be concerned is the received signals from antennas degrade
at wide FOV angles. Therefore a rescale processing is adopted to alleviate the angle
distortion. Only part of the FOV angles is used instead of the whole FOV angles. From
equation, a new relation of d sin ( θ ) = d 'sin ( θ ') could be derived and define the scaling
factor ( ξ ) as
d ' sin ( θ )
ξ= =
d sin ( θ ')
where d ' is the scaled baseline distance. To verify the rescale effect, a smaller θ ' is used
in equation and derived a longer d ' . As mentioned in the beginning of this section, a long
baseline distance means a better AOA resolution. Further, combining equation with, a
new relation could be given as
Mˆ λ
di' = diξ = ξ
4mi N
where di' is the virtual scaled baseline distance [6].
Next, encode the folding waveforms from equation into virtual folding waveforms
by comparing to the threshold given as
m − j + 0.5
V j , mi = cos i π , 1 ≤ j ≤ mi .
mi
Figure 13 shows a virtual folding waveform example of moduli m1 = 3 and m2 = 4 .
19
Figure 13. RSNS Folding Waveforms for m1 = 3 and m2 = 4 (From [12])
Finally, calculate the phase adjustment ( ς i ) and align the center of the dynamic
°
( )
range to the folding waveforms at broadside θ = 0 [12]. Therefore, after add phase
adjustment, equation would become
Vout ( θ ) = cos ( kd sin θ + ς ) .
20
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
21
III. TRACKING RADARS AND TECHNIQUES
22
1. Single-Target Tracker (STT)
The single-target Tracker (STT) continuously tracks a target with a high data rate
of observation frequency. Data rate depends on the how many times radar observes the
target and typically 10 observations per second are enough for the guided missile
weapon-control radar. The STT with closed-loop servo system obtained the angle-error
signal and keep adjusting the tracker to minimize the angle-error. Lots of military
weapon-control system deploys STT to track airplanes or missiles. Figure 15 shows
tracking radar (AN/FPQ-6) with 29-ft reflector antenna. It has 0.1 mil tracking accuracy
and is specialized in long-range, small-target tracking.
The observation rate (renew rate) of Automatic Detection and Track (ADT) is
lower than STT because it deploys an open-looped servo system. Data rate is proportional
23
to the rotation rate of the servo. However, ADT could track large amounts of targets at
the same time but STT could only track one.
Phased array radar could track large amounts of targets by steering the beams
electronically. Computers use different time frames to control beams point to the desired
direction. It has high target renew rate of STT and multiple targets tracking ability of
ADT. The structure of phase array is more complicated than STT and ADT because each
array element should contain individual phase shifter, LNA and TX/RX module.
24
4. Track While Scan (TWS)
1. Conical Scan
Sample text.
Sample text.
2. Sequential Lobing
25
3. Monopulse Tracking
C. TRACKING ACCURACY
Sample text.
Sample text.
a. Glint
b. Receiver Noise
c. Amplitude Fluctuations
d. Servo Noise
26
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
27
IV. SINGLE CHANNEL RSNS COMPUTER SIMULATION AND
HARDWARE TESTING RESULTS
B. CALIBRATION
C. HARDWARE SETUP
D. RSNS IN LABVIEW
E. MATLAB SIMULATION
Difference between Ideal AOA, Estimated AOA and Measured AOA at SNR = 10
100
Ideal AOA
80 Estimated AOA @ SNR = 10
Measured AOA
60
40
Error (Degrees)
20
-20
-40
-60
-80
-100
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80
AOA (Degrees)
Figure 17. Difference between Ideal AOA, Estimated AOA and Measured AOA at SNR = 10
28
Difference between Ideal AOA, Estimated AOA and Measured AOA at SNR = 20
100
Ideal AOA
80 Estimated AOA @ SNR = 20
Measured AOA
60
40
Error (Degrees)
20
-20
-40
-60
-80
-100
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80
AOA (Degrees)
Figure 18. Difference between Ideal AOA, Estimated AOA and Measured AOA at SNR = 20
29
Difference between Ideal AOA, Estimated AOA and Measured AOA at SNR = 30
100
Ideal AOA
80 Estimated AOA @ SNR = 30
Measured AOA
60
40
Error (Degrees)
20
-20
-40
-60
-80
-100
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80
AOA (Degrees)
Figure 19. Difference between Ideal AOA, Estimated AOA and Measured AOA at SNR = 30
30
Difference between Ideal AOA, Estimated AOA and Measured AOA at SNR = 40
100
Ideal AOA
80 Estimated AOA @ SNR = 40
Measured AOA
60
40
Error (Degrees)
20
-20
-40
-60
-80
-100
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80
AOA (Degrees)
Figure 20. Difference between Ideal AOA, Estimated AOA and Measured AOA at SNR = 40
31
Difference between Ideal AOA, Estimated AOA and Measured AOA at SNR = 50
100
Ideal AOA
80 Estimated AOA @ SNR = 50
Measured AOA
60
40
Error (Degrees)
20
-20
-40
-60
-80
-100
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80
AOA (Degrees)
Figure 21. Difference between Ideal AOA, Estimated AOA and Measured AOA at SNR = 50
32
Difference between Ideal AOA, Estimated AOA and Measured AOA at SNR = 60
100
Ideal AOA
80 Estimated AOA @ SNR = 60
Measured AOA
60
40
Error (Degrees)
20
-20
-40
-60
-80
-100
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80
AOA (Degrees)
Figure 22. Difference between Ideal AOA, Estimated AOA and Measured AOA at SNR = 60
33
Difference between Ideal AOA, Estimated AOA and Measured AOA at SNR = 70
100
Ideal AOA
80 Estimated AOA @ SNR = 70
Measured AOA
60
40
Error (Degrees)
20
-20
-40
-60
-80
-100
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80
AOA (Degrees)
Figure 23. Difference between Ideal AOA, Estimated AOA and Measured AOA at SNR = 70
34
Difference between Ideal AOA, Estimated AOA and Measured AOA at SNR = 80
100
Ideal AOA
80 Estimated AOA @ SNR = 80
Measured AOA
60
40
Error (Degrees)
20
-20
-40
-60
-80
-100
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80
AOA (Degrees)
Figure 24. Difference between Ideal AOA, Estimated AOA and Measured AOA at SNR = 80
35
Difference between Ideal AOA, Estimated AOA and Measured AOA at SNR = 90
100
Ideal AOA
80 Estimated AOA @ SNR = 90
Measured AOA
60
40
Error (Degrees)
20
-20
-40
-60
-80
-100
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80
AOA (Degrees)
Figure 25. Difference between Ideal AOA, Estimated AOA and Measured AOA at SNR = 90
36
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
37
V. TRACKING WITH SINGLE CHANNEL RSNS AND
MONOPULSE DIGITAL BEAMFORMING TESTING RESULTS
A. ANECHOIC CHAMBER
B. HARDWARE SETUP
38
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
39
VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A. CONCLUSIONS
40
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
41
LIST OF REFERENCES
[1] Merrill I. Skolnik, “Introduction to Radar Systems” 3rd Edition, pp. 248–266,
McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2001.
[3] John A. Bartee, “Genetic algorithms as a tool for phased array radar design,”
Master’s Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, June 2002.
[4] Berat Levent Gezer, "Multi-Beam Digital Antenna for Radar, Communications,
and UAV Tracking Based on Off-The-Shelf Wireless Technologies," Master’s
Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, September 2006.
[7] Tan and Devieash James Pandya, “UAV Digital Tracking Array Design,
Development and Testing,” Master’s Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School,
Monterey, California, December 2009.
[8] Anthony Lee, “Variable Resolution Direction Finding Using the Robust
Symmetrical Number System,” Master’s Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School,
Monterey, California, December 2006.
[9] David C. Jenn, "RSNS Processing Using A Single Channel," Naval Postgraduate
School, Monterey California, 2006 (unpublished notes).
[11] James H. Mcclellan, Ronald W. Schafer and Mark A. Yoder, Signal Processing
First, 1st edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2003.
[12] Jui-Chun Chen, "A Virtual RSNS Direction Finding Antenna System," Master’s
Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, December 2004.
[16] Kazimierz Siwiak and Yasaman Bahreini, Radiowave Propagation and Antennas
for Personal Communications, 3rd edition, Artech House, Norwood, MA, 2007.
[17] David M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering, 3rd edition, John Wiley & Sons,
Hoboken, NJ, 2005.
[18] Warren L. Stutzman and Gary A. Thiele, Antenna Theory and Design, 2nd
edition, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 1998.
[19]
[20] Merrill I. Skolnik, Introduction to Radar Systems, 3rd edition, McGraw-Hill, New
York, NY, 2001.
[22] David C. Jenn, Radar and Laser Cross Section Engineering, 2nd edition,
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, 2005.
[23] Simon Haykin and Michael Moher, Introduction to Analog & Digital
Communications, 2nd edition, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2007.
[24] Roberto Cristi, Modern Digital Signal Processing, 1st edition, Thomson
Learning, Pacific Grove, CA, 2004.
[25] Adel S. Sedra and Kenneth C. Smith, Microelectronic Circuits, 5th edition,
Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 2004.
[26]
[27]
43
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
44
INITIAL DISTRIBUTION LIST
3. Chairman, Code EC
Naval Postgraduate School
Monterey, California
6. Robert D. Broadston
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Naval Postgraduate School
Monterey, California
45