Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Scoring and
TM
Reporting Software
User’s
Manual
PO Box 1416
Minneapolis, MN 55440
800-627-7271
PearsonAssessments.com
Project Team
PearsonAssessments.com
Table of Contents
Software License Agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
BOT–2 ASSIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Getting Started . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Installing the BOT–2 ASSIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Updating the BOT–2 ASSIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Uninstalling the BOT–2 ASSIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Getting Around . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Basic Navigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Program Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Add New Examinee(s) and/or Test Record(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Open an Existing Examinee’s Information and/or Test Record . . . . . . . . . 9
Run Reports for Existing Test Records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Import or Export Examinee Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Select Your Privacy Preferences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Get Help . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Exit the BOT–2 ASSIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Adding and Editing Users . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
To Add a User . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
To Select a Supervisor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
To Edit a User . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
To Delete a User . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
To Restrict Examinee Access . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Setting Privacy Preferences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
To Set Test Record Privacy Preferences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Adding New Examinee(s) and/or Test Record(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
To Add a New Examinee to the Database . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
To Select an Existing Examinee from the Database . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
To Add a New Test Record . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
To Enter Test Record Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Entering Test Record Scores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
To Enter Test Record Scores for the Complete Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
To Enter Item Raw Scores for a Subtest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
To Enter a Total Point Score for a Subtest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
To Transform BOT–2 Subtest Item Raw Scores and Total Point Scores . 24
Exceptions to Calculating Complete Form Scale Scores and
Standard Scores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
To Enter Test Record Scores for the Short Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
To Enter Item Raw Scores for the Short Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
To Enter the Total Point Score for the Short Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Exception to Calculating the Short Form Standard Score . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Creating a Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
To Create a BOT–2 Complete Form Report for this Examinee . . . . . . . . . 27
To Create a BOT–2 Short Form Report for this Examinee . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Table of Contents, continued
Generating, Printing, and Saving a Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
To Generate a Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
To Print a Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
To Save the Report to Your Computer in a PDF or RTF Format . . . . . . . 30
To Cut/Copy and Paste Information from a BOT–2 Report Saved
as a PDF or RTF File . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Opening an Existing Examinee’s Information and/or Test Record . . . . 32
To Edit Previously Entered Examinee Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
To Delete an Examinee from the Database . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
To Edit a Previously Entered Test Record . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
To Delete a Previously Entered Test Record . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
Creating One or More Reports from Previously Entered Test Records 35
To Create One or More Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Importing and Exporting Examinee Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
To Import Examinee Information into the BOT–2 ASSIST . . . . . . . . . . . 37
To Prepare an Import File . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
To Import a File into the BOT–2 ASSIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
To Export Examinee and/or Test Record Information from the
BOT–2 ASSIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
Merging Test Records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
To Create a Merge File . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
To Import a Merge File . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
Troubleshooting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
Technical Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Appendix A: Variable Labels Used in Exporting Files . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Appendix B: List of Sample Report Components
Demographics and Test Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
Motor Score Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
Pairwise Comparisons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
Score Profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
Narrative Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
Item Raw Score Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
Parent/Caregiver Letter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
Software License Agreement
IMPORTANT — READ CAREFULLY: This is a software license agreement
(“License”) between you (“Licensee”) and Pearson Assessments, a business
unit of NCS Pearson, Inc. (“Licensor”), governing the copyright- and trade
secret-protected Pearson Assessments Software (“Software”). By installing,
copying, downloading, accessing, or otherwise using the Software, you
agree to be bound by the terms of this License. If you do not agree to the
terms of this License, Licensor is unwilling to license the Software to you.
In such event, you may not use or install the Software, and you should
promptly contact Licensor to obtain a refund.
e. Licensee agrees not to create derivative works based upon the
Software, including extraction, in whole or in part, of any images.
f. Licensee agrees not to use the Software to load any unauthorized
copyrighted third-party materials onto any Single Computer or
Networked Computer.
4. Confidentiality. Licensee acknowledges and agrees that the Software
is the confidential and proprietary information and trade secret of
Licensor, and Licensee hereby covenants and agrees to exert its due
diligence to prevent disclosure or copying of the Software and maintain
the same as confidential. Licensee further covenants and agrees to
recover, stop, and/or strictly limit any unauthorized disclosure relating
to the Software which may occur.
5. WARRANTIES. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED “AS IS” WITHOUT
WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, WHETHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES
OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS, AND WITHOUT ANY
WARRANTIES AS TO NONINFRINGEMENT OF ANY KIND.
6. WAIVER. LICENSEE AGREES THAT IN NO EVENT SHALL
LICENSOR BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, SPECIAL, INDIRECT, OR
CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM
LOSS OF USE OF DATA, PROFITS OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION,
WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE,
OR OTHER TORTIOUS CONDUCT, ARISING OUT OF OR IN
CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THE
SOFTWARE OR ANY PART THEREOF.
7. Indemnification. Licensee agrees to indemnify and hold harmless
Licensor, its suppliers, subsidiaries, parent companies, officers, and
employees for any damages, including attorneys’ fees, asserted by any
third party for any use of the Software.
8. Remedies. Licensee acknowledges that Licensor’s remedies at law for
a breach or threatened breach of the provisions of this document are
inadequate and hereby agrees that Licensor shall be entitled to equitable
relief (including, without limitation, injunctive relief) for any breach
or threatened breach of the terms of this document in addition to any
other remedies at law or in equity available to Licensor. The terms of this
document shall survive the termination of this License.
9. Termination.
a. Without prejudice to any other rights, Licensor may terminate this
License if Licensee fails to comply with the terms and conditions
of this License.
b. In the event of termination, Licensee agrees to destroy all copies
of the Software and all of its component parts and all
Printed Materials.
10. Copyright. Licensee acknowledges and agrees that all copyrights in
the Software, including but not limited to any images, photographs,
animations, video, audio, music, text, and “applets” incorporated
into the Software, the accompanying printed materials (“Printed
Materials”), and any copies of the Software, are owned by Licensor.
11. Reservation. All rights not expressly granted under this License are
reserved by Licensor.
12. Assignment. Licensor may, without any notice to Licensee, assign
and transfer its obligations and rights under this License to any
Pearson plc business unit. Licensor may not assign or transfer its
rights and obligations to any party except with prior written approval
from Licensor.
13. Reasonable Efforts. Licensee agrees to undertake reasonable effort to
communicate and enforce all of the terms of this License to employees
of Licensee who have access to the Software.
14. Notification. Licensee agrees to notify Licensor in writing of any
unauthorized use within thirty days of becoming aware of said
unauthorized use.
15. No Waiver of Rights. Licensee agrees that no delay or failure to take
action represents a waiver of the Licensor’s rights.
16. Governing Law. Licensee agrees that this License is governed by the
laws of the State of Minnesota, United States of America, and Licensee
agrees to be subject to personal jurisdiction in the state and federal
courts of the State of Minnesota.
17. Federal Government Terms and Conditions. If Licensee is the
United States Government or any agency or instrumentality thereof,
the Products are provided with RESTRICTED RIGHTS. Use,
duplication, or disclosure by the United States Government of the
Products is subject to restriction as set forth in: (a) subparagraph
(c)(1)(ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software
clause at DFAR 252.227-7013 (October 1988), if Licensee is subject to
Department of Defense Federal Acquisition Regulations; or (b) FAR
52.227-19 (June 1987), if Licensee is not subject to the DFAR, but are
the United States Government or an agency or instrumentality thereof.
The Contractor, for purposes of such provisions, is NCS Pearson, Inc.,
5601 Green Valley Drive, Bloomington, Minnesota 55437.
18. Export Regulations. Licensee agrees not to import, export, or
reexport the Software in violation of U.S. export laws and regulations.
Introduction
The Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition (BOT–2;
Bruininks & Bruininks, 2005), is an individually administered test that uses
engaging, goal-directed activities to measure a wide array of motor skills
in individuals aged 4 through 21. It is designed to provide practitioners
such as occupational therapists, physical therapists, developmental adaptive
physical education teachers, and researchers, among others, with a reliable
and efficient measure of fine and gross motor control skills. The BOT–2
has two forms: the 53-item Complete Form and the 14-item Short Form.
The Complete Form consists of eight subtests and yields derived scores
for the eight subtests, four motor-area composites, and the Total Motor
Composite. The Short Form consists of one or two items from each of the
eight BOT–2 subtests and yields derived scores for a single composite score
of overall motor proficiency, similar to the Total Motor Composite. This
software provides scoring for both BOT–2 forms.
For more information about the use and interpretation of the BOT–2,
refer to the BOT–2 Manual.
BOT–2 ASSIST
The BOT–2 ASSIST software program can be used on a Windows® or
Macintosh® platform and allows users to complete the following tasks:
u Add, edit, or delete ASSIST users (administrative users only)
Note: The BOT–2 ASSIST software cannot be used to score data from the
administration of the first edition of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor
Proficiency (BOTMP; Bruininks, 1978).
Getting Started
Check that your personal computer meets the system requirements listed
for the BOT–2 ASSIST. Then, follow the installation instructions.
Minimum Requirements
Platform Operating Processor RAM Available Hard- Monitor
System Drive Space Settings
Windows 2000, XP, Pentium II, 128 MB 100 MB with Java 24-bit
or later 300 MHz available virtual machine;
or higher 60 MB without Java
Macintosh OS X v10.3.x Power Mac virtual machine
(Panther) G3
or later
Recommended Requirements
Platform Operating Processor RAM Available Hard- Monitor
System Drive Space Settings
Windows 2000, XP, Pentium II, 256 MB 100 MB with Java 24-bit
or later 400 MHz available virtual machine;
or higher 60 MB without Java
Macintosh OS X v10.3.x Power Mac virtual machine
(Panther) G3
or later
Note: If the auto-launch does not run, do the following:
a. Double-click on My Computer.
b. Double-click on your CD-ROM drive.
c. Double-click on the Setup.exe icon to begin installing.
After the BOT–2 ASSIST is installed, another installer will launch
for the Java 2 Runtime Environment. If the proper version of Java
is already installed, you will be asked to modify or remove the
current installation. Click Cancel to exit the install. If the proper
version is not installed, a license agreement will appear. Follow
the onscreen prompts to complete installation of the Java 2
Runtime Environment. You may be prompted to restart once
the install is complete.
Macintosh OS X version 10.3 Users:
a. Double-click on the CD icon that appears on your desktop.
b. Double-click on the Setup icon.
c. Follow the onscreen instructions to install the BOT–2 ASSIST
to your desktop.
5. Double-click on the BOT–2 ASSIST icon located where you chose
to install it.
–OR–
Windows Users:
Go to your computer’s Start menu. Select Programs ➔ AGS
➔ BOT–2 ASSIST ➔ BOT–2 ASSIST.
Macintosh Users:
Go to Macintosh HD ➔ Applications ➔ BOT–2 ASSIST
➔ BOT–2 ASSIST.
The first time you run the BOT–2 ASSIST you will be prompted to
set up the application for Just this user or All users. Please note that
if you do not have administrative privileges to your computer, you
will want to select Just this user.
Note: When you launch the BOT–2 ASSIST, type AGS in the
User Name field and safety in the Password field.
Updating the BOT–2 ASSIST
Pearson Assessments may make periodic updates to this product. After
installing the BOT–2 ASSIST, check for the latest updates by opening the
Help menu and selecting Check for Updates. Follow the onscreen
instructions to complete the update.
Note: Your computer must be connected to the Internet to complete
the update.
Getting Around
The BOT–2 ASSIST software can be used on a Windows or Macintosh
operating system. Resources for using the Windows operating system are
available on the Internet at www.microsoft.com. Resources for using the
Macintosh operating system can be found at www.apple.com. Bookstores
have additional materials for using both operating systems.
Basic Navigation
Use any of these methods to move through the program:
u Click the mouse.
the Tab, Enter, Home, End, or arrow keys (← ↑ → ↓) on
u Press
your keyboard.
u Tap the Space Bar to select buttons, radio buttons, or check boxes.
Program Overview
Add New Examinee(s) and/or Test Record(s)
Do any of the following:
u Enter examinee information
u Enter test information to create a test record
u nter item raw scores or subtest total point scores for the BOT–2
E
Complete Form or Short Form
u Create a report for the examinee (after item raw scores or total
point scores are entered for all subtests)
See detailed instructions on adding examinees and test records.
Select Your Privacy Preferences
Choose to make the test records you enter either private (available to only
one user; requires password protection) or public (available to all users).
Note: This feature can be overridden for individual test records.
See detailed instructions on setting your privacy preference.
Get Help
To access the electronic (PDF) help file, select the Help button on the
toolbar at the top of the ASSIST application window.
10
Adding and Editing Users
Note: Only Administrative Users or Single Users with administrative rights
can add or edit users in the ASSIST. This option will not be available when
a Basic User is logged into the program.
To Add a User
1. Under the File menu, select Edit Users. The Administration:
Add/Edit Users window will appear (see Figure 1).
11
To Select a Supervisor
You can assign a supervisor to any user’s account. A supervisor can view
not only the private records that he or she has entered but also those of the
users assigned to him or her. A supervisor also can view the records of the
users under the subordinate’s supervision.
1. Under the File menu, select Edit Users. The Administration:
Add/Edit Users window will appear.
2. In the window, click on the user whom you want to assign
a supervisor.
3. Click on the drop-down menu labeled Select a Supervisor and
select the supervisor’s name. Either a basic or an administrative
user can be a supervisor; however, administrative users can see
all records by default, so it is not necessary to name them as
supervisors.
4. Click the Save button.
To Edit a User
1. Under the File menu, select Edit Users. The Administration:
Add/Edit Users window will appear.
2. In the window, click on the user listing that you want to edit.
3. Edit the necessary information.
4. Click the Save button.
To Delete a User
1. Under the File menu, select Edit Users. The Administration:
Add/Edit Users window will appear.
2. In the window, click on the user listing to be deleted.
3. Click the Delete button. Confirm the deletion by clicking the Yes
button in the window.
4. The program will indicate if the deleted user has entered any test
records. From the pull-down menu in the Transfer Ownership
window, choose another user to be assigned ownership of any test
records entered by the user being deleted (see Figure 2).
12
5. Click the OK button. The selected user will now be able to view,
edit, and report on any private records that were owned by the
deleted user.
13
Setting Privacy Preferences
You may want to set default privacy preferences for your records before you
begin entering examinees’ information. Default preferences can be changed
at any time.
14
Adding New Examinee(s) and/or
Test Record(s)
When adding a new examinee to the database, you must first enter
identifying information about the examinee into the program. After the
examinee has been added to the database, you can then enter his or her test
record information and scores.
Note: To enter an examinee’s information by importing a list from your
data-management system, follow the instructions in the Importing and
Exporting Examinee Information section.
15
3. Click Save. The program will confirm that the record has been
saved and the Test Records table will appear (see Figure 6).
16
To Add a New Test Record
Adding a new test record requires two steps: entering Test Record
Information and entering Test Record Item Raw Scores and/or Total Point
Scores. Once you have entered test scores for an examinee, the test record
will be listed in his or her Test Records table.
17
5. Select the examiner’s name from the drop-down menu in the
Examiner field (required). If the examiner who administered the
BOT–2 is not listed, select Edit Examiners from the drop-down
menu. A window will appear (see Figure 9). To add or delete a
new examiner:
u To add an examiner, enter the examiner’s name and titles, if
applicable, in the appropriate fields, and click Save.
u To delete an existing examiner, click on the examiner’s name,
and then click the Delete button.
18
7. Indicate any of the following (optional):
u In School (Yes or No)
u Current Grade
u Ethnicity
uT
esting Site (Note: Each testing site entered into the program
will automatically be saved to the pull-down menu for future
selection.)
u School/Clinic
u Classification/Diagnosis
ttention, Fluidity of movement, Effort, and Understanding
uA
ratings (using the drop-down menus)
u Reason for assessment
u Other information
8. Click the Next button to retain the information you have entered
and move to the next screen.
9. Click Cancel if you do not want to save the information you
have entered.
19
Entering Test Record Scores
After you have saved the information entered on the Test Record:
Information screen, the Test Record: Scores screen will appear. This screen
is used to enter scores from the BOT–2 Complete Form and Short Form.
Based on the form you indicated on the Test Record: Information screen,
the software will activate either the Complete Form section or the Short
Form section of the screen.
20
To Enter Item Raw Scores for a Subtest
1. Click the IRS button in the Item Raw Score Entry (IRS) column
next to the subtest name.
u I f a total point score has not previously been entered for that
subtest, the Test Record: Item Raw Score Entry screen will
appear (see Figure 11).
u If a total point score has previously been entered for that subtest,
a pop-up window will warn you that selecting a different
method of score entry will cause you to lose previously entered
data (see Figure 12). You must then choose whether to proceed
with entering item raw scores. If you chose to proceed, the score
entry method changes to IRS on the Test Record: Scores screen
and the Test Record: Item Raw Score Entry screen will appear.
21
2. Each subtest’s Test Record: Item Raw Score Entry screen contains
the item name and the field(s) for entering the raw score(s) for
each item in that subtest (see Figure 11). Place the cursor in the
field for the item you want to score.
u hen you place the cursor in an item raw score entry field, the
W
valid raw score range for that item is displayed at the top of the
screen just below the subtest’s name.
u Invalid item raw score entries include any score that is not
indicated as being within the valid raw score range. The
program automatically deletes any invalid entry in the item
raw score field when you move cursor to another field. That is,
the item raw score entry field will be empty.
u After you enter a valid item score, use the mouse, Tab key, or
Enter key to move the cursor to the item raw score entry field
for that item’s second trial or to the entry field for the next item
you want to score. If a score is missing for a particular item or
trial, use the mouse to move the cursor to the raw score entry
field of the next item you want to score.
3. After all item raw scores have been entered, click the Score button
at the bottom of the screen. You will then be asked if you wish to
verify the raw scores you have just entered. Doing so clears the
screen of all previously entered item raw scores but saves them in
the program’s memory. You may then re-enter the subtest’s item
raw scores.
4. Click the Verify button to compare the two sets of raw scores
you have entered. A message will appear explaining that fields
shaded in red indicate entries that do not match your original
entries. Clicking OK will
clear the item raw score
fields that do not match
your original entries
(see Figure 13). Enter
the correct score, and
then click Score. If no
inconsistencies remain,
click Score.
Figure 13.
Test Record: Item Raw
Score Entry screen with
inconsistent scores
22
5. The BOT–2 ASSIST will then check for missing scores. If any item
is missing an item raw score, a pop-up window will indicate which
item(s) is (are) missing raw scores (see Figure 14).
u lick the OK button. You can then enter raw scores for the
C
necessary item(s).
u Click Score again. The program will again check for missing
scores and display any necessary error messages.
6. The Score Confirmation pop-up screen appears after the ASSIST
software determines that all required item raw scores have been
entered (see Figure 15). This screen displays the point scores for
each item and the total point score for the subtest. Click Yes to
accept the scoring and proceed with score entry.
23
7. Click the Exit button at the bottom of the Test Record: Item
Raw Score Entry screen at any time to return to the Test Record:
Scores screen. A pop-up window will appear that gives you the
option of saving or deleting the data entered to that point. You
will then be returned to the Test Record: Scores screen. Any items
with missing scores when the data are resaved will be treated
as missing.
24
To Enter Test Record Scores for the Short Form
If you indicated Short Form on the Test Record: Information screen, only
the Short Form section of the Test Record: Scores screen will be activated
(see Figure 16). The BOT–2 ASSIST provides two options for entering Short
Form scores: Item Raw Score Entry (IRS) or Total Point Score Entry (TPS).
25
Figure 17. Short Form Test Record: Item Raw Score Entry screen
26
Creating a Report
To Create a BOT–2 Complete Form Report for This Examinee
After you have entered all necessary test record information and scores,
click the Report button at the bottom of the Test Record: Scores screen.
The Create Report screen will appear (see Figure 19). Use this screen to
select the norms, confidence level, and optional report components you
want to include in the examinee’s report. The Cover Page and Motor Score
Summary are the only report components that are not optional.
27
u Motor Score Summary. This table includes raw and derived
scores for the subtests, motor-area composites, and Total Motor
Composite, including scale scores, standard scores, confidence
intervals, percentile ranks, age equivalents, and descriptive
categories. This page is included in every report.
u Composite Pairwise Comparisons. This section compares the
examinee’s motor-area composite standard scores, investigating
score differences and determining the statistical significance
and frequency of occurrence of any differences. Comparisons
involving composites that are missing standard scores are not
performed.
u Subtest Pairwise Comparisons. This section compares the
examinee’s subtest scale scores both within a composite and/or
across composites. Within-composite pairwise comparisons
compare the scale scores of subtests within a motor-area
composite, investigating score differences and determining
the statistical significance and frequency of occurrence of any
differences. Comparisons involving subtests that are missing
scale scores are not performed. Across-composite pairwise
comparisons compare the scale scores of subtests from different
motor-area composites, investigating score differences and
determining the statistical significance and frequency of
occurrence of any differences. You can specify up to three
across-composite subtests pairwise comparisons (see Custom
Subtest Pairwise Comparisons below). Comparisons involving
subtests that are missing scale scores are not performed.
u Score Profile. This graph presents scale scores and confidence
intervals for subtests and standard scores and confidence
intervals for motor-area composites and the Total Motor
Composite. This section also includes a normal curve.
u Narrative Report. This section describes the examinee’s results
in a narrative format. Narrative statements are generated
based on the subtest scale scores, motor-area composite and
Total Motor Composite standard scores, and the examinee’s
demographic data.
u Parent/Caregiver Letter. This summary of the examinee’s
BOT–2 results is designed to be given directly to the examinee’s
parent or caregiver.
28
u Custom Subtest Pairwise Comparisons. In addition to the four
within-composite subtest pairwise comparisons, you can also
specify up to three across-composite subtest comparisons using
the paired drop-down boxes. Comparisons involving subtests
that are missing scale scores are not performed.
4. If you anticipate using the same report components every time
you create a report, click the Save My Selections button in the
lower right hand corner of the screen, and these components will
automatically be selected the next time you come to this screen.
You can override your selections for a single report, but your
default component selections will not change unless you click Save
My Selections again.
29
Generating, Printing, and
Saving a Report
To Generate a Report
To generate and preview the BOT–2 report for the examinee, click the
Preview button at the bottom of the Create Report screen. The BOT–2
Report Viewer window will open (see Figure 20).
To Print a Report
To print a report, click the Print button. A BOT–2 Complete Form sample
report is presented in Appendix B.
30
Figure 21. Save As report pop-up window
31
Opening an Existing Examinee’s
Information and/or Test Record
For all of the following tasks, first select the Open an Existing Examinee’s
Information and/or Test Record button on the toolbar. The Select or Add
Examinee screen will appear (see Figure 22).
32
To Delete an Examinee from the Database
1. On the Select or Add Examinee screen, click on the name of the
examinee that you would like to delete from the database.
2. Click the Delete Examinee button.
3. Confirm that you want to delete the examinee and all BOT–2
records belonging to the examinee (see Figure 23).
Note: Only Administrative Users may delete examinees. Use caution when
deleting. It is recommended that you backup your database before deleting
any examinees. To do so, select Backup/Restore from the File menu, and
then click Backup in the pop-up window. To return your database to a
previous state, select Backup/Restore from the File menu, select a backup
listed in the pop-up window, and then click Restore.
33
To Delete a Previously Entered Test Record
1. On the Select or Add Examinee screen, double-click on the name
of the examinee whose test record you want to delete. Or, click
once on the examinee’s name, and then click the Open Examinee
button in the bottom right corner of the screen.
2. In the Test Records table, click on the test record you want to
delete, and then click the Delete Test Record button.
3. Confirm that you want to delete the selected test record.
34
Creating One or More Reports
from Previously Entered Test
Records
To Create One or More Reports
1. Click on the Run Reports for Existing Test Records button
on the toolbar. The Select Test Record(s) for Report screen will
appear (see Figure 24).
35
3. Select the test record(s).
u Toselect one test record, click once on the test record you
want to run a report on.
u To select multiple records, hold down the Control key (for
Windows users) or Command key (for Macintosh users) on
your keyboard, and click once on each test record entry you
want to run a report on.
u To select all the records in the list, click the Select All button
at the bottom of the screen.
4. Click the Create Report button at the bottom of the screen.
The Create Report screen will appear (see Figure 25).
36
Importing and Exporting
Examinee Information
If you do not wish to manually enter all of your examinee information,
the BOT–2 ASSIST software allows you to import a list of examinee
information from another application.
37
When working with your file, keep in mind:
u he order of the columns in your file is not important; after you
T
import, the BOT–2 ASSIST software will allow you to specify
what each column of data represents.
u The following fields can be used:
Import File Field Requirements (*indicates required fields)
Field Description Length Data Type
*Last Name 20 characters any letters
*First Name 20 characters any letters
Middle Initial 1 character any letters
*Birth Date 10 characters mm/dd/yyyy
m/d/yy
m-d-yy
yyyy-m-d
yyyy/m/d
*Sex 1 character M or F
Male or Female
ID number 16 characters any numbers
Note: If your file has columns not needed when using the BOT–2
ASSIST, you do not need to remove the extra information. You will
be able to tell the program to ignore selected columns when you
import the file.
4. Select Save As (under the File menu in Microsoft Excel).
5. Select the option to save as Text-Only, Plain Text, or ASCII Text.
In Microsoft Excel, choose Text (Tab delimited) (see Figure 27).
38
To Import a File into the BOT–2 ASSIST
1. Click the Import or Export Examinee(s) Information button in
the toolbar.
2. On the Import or Export Data screen (see Figure 28), click the
Select File button.
3. In the pop-up window, find the text file that you just saved
(see Figure 29), and then click on the file name.
4. Click the Open button. The location of your file will appear in
the Path and Name of Selected File field on the Import or Export
Data screen.
39
5. Click the Continue button. The field information from your
imported file will be displayed in the Import Data: Assign Labels
screen (see Figure 30).
6. Use the drop-down menus to select a label for each column
(see Figure 30). Do not select a label for the column(s) that you
don’t want to import; the software will ignore all columns
without labels.
7. When you are finished labeling the columns, select the rows of
data (i.e., the examinees’ information) that you want to import.
u To select one examinee, click on the appropriate row in the list.
u To select multiple examinees, hold down the Control key
(Windows) or Command key (Macintosh) on your keyboard,
and click on each row you want to import.
u To select all the examinees in the list, click the Select All button.
8. Click the Import button. An Import Results pop-up window will
confirm how many examinee records were selected, how many
duplicates were ignored, how many errors were encountered, and
how many examinee records were successfully imported.
40
To Export Examinee and/or Test Record Information from the
BOT–2 ASSIST
The BOT–2 ASSIST software allows you to export a list of examinee and/or
test record information for use in other programs.
1. Click the Import or Export Examinee(s) Information button on
the toolbar.
2. In the Export Research File section of the screen, select the data
you want to include in the export file by clicking the appropriate
button (see Figure 31).
Figure 31. Import or Export Data screen, Export Research File section
3. Find the test record(s) you want to export (see Figure 32).
To use the Quick Find option:
a. T
ype your search criteria in the Quick Find field (e.g., Smith).
b. S elect the search category in the Search By pull-down menu
(e.g., Name).
c. R
ecords that match your search criteria will appear in the list.
d. T
o view all records again, delete the search criteria from the
Quick Find field.
41
Figure 32. Select Test Records for Export screen
42
Merging Test Records
The merging function allows you to share test records across copies of the
BOT–2 ASSIST. Using this function, you can create a merge file containing
all of your test records for use in another copy of this software and you can
import a merge file that you have created in another copy of this software.
43
3. Click the Continue button. The Select Test Record(s) for Merge
File screen (see Figure 35) will appear.
4. Select the examinee test record(s) you want to include in your
merge file.
u To select one examinee, click on the appropriate row in the list.
u To select multiple examinees, hold down the Control key
(Windows) or Command key (Macintosh) on your keyboard,
and click on each row you want to import.
u To select all the examinees in the list, click the Select All button.
5. Click the Continue button.
6. Select a location to save the file and name the file.
7. Click Save.
44
Troubleshooting
Problem: Reports and some screens on Macintosh OS X do not honor
type styles, such as bold and italics.
Description: Microsoft Office installs fonts into the Library/fonts folder
in the user’s home directory. Once installed, these fonts are used by Java
applications instead of those installed with the system, which may cause
problems. The installed fonts include:
u Arial
u Arial Black
u Century Gothic
u Comic Sans MS
u Copperplate Gothic Bold
u Copperplate Gothic Light
u Curlz MT
u Edwardian Script ITC
u Impact
u Lucida Handwriting
u Monotype Sorts
u Tahoma
u Times New Roman
u Verdana
u Wingdings
Workaround: Remove the fonts installed by Microsoft Office that are
causing problems.
45
Technical Support
Technical Support is available for the BOT–2 ASSIST:
u On the Pearson Assessments website at
http://ags.pearsonassessments.com/tech/
u Bycalling the Pearson Assessments toll-free number at
800-627-7271 from 7:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (CST)
46
References
Bruininks, R. H. (1978). Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency.
Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, Inc.
Bruininks, R. H., & Bruininks, B. D. (2005). Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of
Motor Proficiency (2nd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: AGS Publishing.
47
Appendix A: Variable Labels
Used in Exporting Files
Research files that have been exported from the BOT–2 ASSIST are assigned
the following labels, which are used to identify the exported variables.
Short Form Variable Labels
Name Description
FIRST_NAME Examinee First Name
MIDDLE_INITIAL Examinee Middle Initial
LAST_NAME Examinee Last Name
ID_NUMBER Examinee Identification Number
SEX Examinee Sex
BIRTH_DATE Examinee Birth Date
TEST_DATE Examinee Test Date
AGE Examinee Age at the time of the
testing session
ETHNICITY Examinee Ethnicity
PREF_DRAW Hand the examinee uses to draw
PREF_THROW Hand/arm the examinee uses to throw
PREF_FOOT Foot/leg the examinee uses to kick
ATTEND_SCHOOL Attends school, yes or no
GRADE Examinee’s grade at the time of the
testing session
SCHOOL Examinee’s school
ATTENTION Poor, marginal, good, or excellent
FLUIDITY Poor, marginal, good, or excellent
EFFORT Poor, marginal, good, or excellent
UNDERSTAND Poor, marginal, good, or excellent
EXAMINER Name of the examiner
FORM Complete or Short
PUSH_UP Full or Knee
NORMS Combined, Female, or Male
48
Appendix A continued:
Variable Labels Used in Exporting Files
49
Appendix A continued:
Variable Labels Used in Exporting Files
Research files that have been exported from the BOT–2 ASSIST are assigned
the following labels, which are used to identify the exported variables.
Complete Form Variable Labels
Name Description
FIRST_NAME Examinee First Name
MIDDLE_INITIAL Examinee Middle Initial
LAST_NAME Examinee Last Name
ID_NUMBER Examinee Identification Number
SEX Examinee Sex
BIRTH_DATE Examinee Birth Date
TEST_DATE Examinee Test Date
AGE Examinee Age at the time of the
testing session
ETHNICITY Examinee Ethnicity
PREF_DRAW Hand the examinee uses to draw
PREF_THROW Hand/arm the examinee uses to throw
PREF_FOOT Foot/leg the examinee uses to kick
ATTEND_SCHOOL Attends school, yes or no
GRADE Examinee’s grade at the time of the
testing session
SCHOOL Examinee’s school
ATTENTION Poor, marginal, good, or excellent
FLUIDITY Poor, marginal, good, or excellent
EFFORT Poor, marginal, good, or excellent
UNDERSTAND Poor, marginal, good, or excellent
EXAMINER Name of the examiner
FORM Complete or Short
PUSH_UP Full or Knee
NORMS Combined, Female, or Male
50
Appendix A continued:
Variable Labels Used in Exporting Files
51
Appendix A continued:
Variable Labels Used in Exporting Files
52
Appendix A continued:
Variable Labels Used in Exporting Files
53
Appendix A continued:
Variable Labels Used in Exporting Files
54
Appendix A continued:
Variable Labels Used in Exporting Files
55
Appendix A continued:
Variable Labels Used in Exporting Files
56
Appendix A continued:
Variable Labels Used in Exporting Files
57
Appendix A continued:
Variable Labels Used in Exporting Files
58
Appendix A continued:
Variable Labels Used in Exporting Files
59
Appendix A continued:
Variable Labels Used in Exporting Files
60
Appendix B:
List of Sample Report Components
Demographics and Test Information
The Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition measures gross and fine motor skills of individuals from age 4 through
21. Results contained herein are confidential, and should only be viewed by those with proper authorization. This computer-generated
report should not be the sole basis for making important decisions related to diagnosis, treatment, or qualification for program eligibility.
Scores and narratives text are based on normative data from the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition (BOT-2).
61
Appendix B continued:
List of Sample Report Components
BOT-2
HUBERT, SAMUEL J. Age: 5:9
ID#: 258901 Test Date: 09/18/2006
62
Appendix B continued:
List of Sample Report Components
Pairwise Comparisons
Composite Comparisons
Subtest Comparisons
63
Appendix B continued:
List of Sample Report Components
Score Profile
64
Appendix B continued:
List of Sample Report Components
Narrative Report
Narrative Report
The Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition (BOT-2) is an individually administered
test that uses engaging, goal-directed activities to measure a wide array of motor skills in individuals aged 4
through 21. The BOT-2 uses a subtest and composite structure that highlights motor performance in the broad
functional areas of stability, mobility, strength, coordination, and object manipulation. There are four motor-
area composites, each comprising two of the eight BOT-2 subtests, and a Total Motor Composite, which
comprises all four composites and provides the most reliable measure of overall motor proficiency.
The BOT-2 provides several types of derived scores that will assist you in interpreting performance and
communicating results to parents and other practitioners. Scale scores (mean = 15, standard deviation = 5),
confidence intervals, age equivalents, and descriptive categories are used to describe subtest performance.
Standard scores (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10), confidence intervals, percentile ranks, and descriptive
categories are used to describe composite and Short Form performance.
SAMUEL HUBERT was administered the Complete Form of the BOT-2 by MARIA JEFFERSON.
SAMUEL's age was 5 years 9 months on the assessment date of September 18, 2006. This report describes
SAMUEL's motor proficiency in relation to a representative national sample of males his age, provides an
analysis of SAMUEL's personal strengths and weaknesses in the four motor-areas and summarizes his
performance level on each subtest.
During the testing session, SAMUEL's attention was observed to be Good, his fluidity of movement was
Marginal, his effort was Marginal, and his understanding of the activities was Excellent.
His fluidity of movement and effort may have affected his performance and should be kept in mind when
interpreting his scores.
SAMUEL's scores on the Total Motor Composite, four motor-area composites, and eight subtests are presented
below. When a standard score or a scale score is reported, the corresponding 90% confidence interval is
presented in parentheses.
SAMUEL's Total Motor Composite standard score of 43 (39-47) summarizes his overall motor proficiency.
His standard score is considered Average and corresponds to a percentile rank of 24. This means that
SAMUEL's standard score is higher than 24% of the population of males his age in the norm sample.
The four motor-area composite standard scores, discussed below, range from 30 on Fine Manual Control to 62
on Manual Coordination. The wide range of scores indicates that important differences in SAMUEL's motor
proficiency among the four motor-area composites are likely and should be taken into consideration when
diagnosing motor impairment and developing motor-training programs.
This motor-area composite measures control and coordination of the distal musculature of the hands and
Report printed for: qa Report generated by BOT-2 ASSIST version 1.0
Report Date: 08/18/2006 Page 5 of 14 Copyright ©2006 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.
65
Appendix B continued:
List of Sample Report Components
fingers, especially for grasping, drawing, and cutting. SAMUEL's Fine Manual Control standard score is 30 (24
-36). This corresponds to a percentile rank of 2. His performance in this area is Well-Below Average for males
his age.
SAMUEL earned a scale score of 5 (2-8) on the Fine Motor Precision subtest and a scale score of 7 (3-11) on
the Fine Motor Integration subtest. His Fine Motor Precision scale score falls in the Well-Below Average range
and his Fine Motor Integration scale score falls in the Below Average range. The difference between
SAMUEL's scale scores on these subtests is not considered significant.
His Fine Motor Precision age equivalent falls in the range of 4 years 0 months through 4 years 1 month (4:0-
4:1). This means that his total point score on this subtest is equal to the average point score earned by males in
this age range. His Fine Motor Integration age equivalent falls in the range of 4:4-4:5.
The Fine Motor Precision subtest consists of activities that require precise control of finger and hand
movement. The object is to draw, fold, or cut within a specified boundary. SAMUEL's score is consistent with
individuals who can color small shapes without going outside the boundaries, make about 5 to 10 errors when
drawing a line through a crooked path (3 mm wide, 20 cm long), and have difficulty remaining within a
boundary 1 cm wide when cutting out a circle.
The Fine Motor Integration subtest requires the examinee to reproduce drawings of various geometric shapes
that range in complexity from a circle to overlapping pencils. SAMUEL's score is consistent with individuals
who, when copying from pictures, have difficulty drawing the basic elements of a square or a triangle.
Manual Coordination
This motor-area composite measures control and coordination of the arms and hands, especially for object
manipulation. SAMUEL's Manual Coordination standard score is 62 (57-67). This corresponds to a percentile
rank of 89. His performance in this area is Above Average for males his age.
SAMUEL earned a scale score of 21 (17-25) on the Manual Dexterity subtest and a scale score of 20 (17-23) on
the Upper-Limb Coordination subtest. Both scale scores fall in the Above Average range. His Manual
Dexterity age equivalent falls in the range of 7:0-7:2 and his Upper-Limb Coordination age equivalent falls in
the range of 7:0-7:2. The difference between SAMUEL's scale scores on these subtests is not considered
significant.
The Manual Dexterity subtest uses goal-directed activities that involve reaching, grasping, and bimanual
coordination with small objects. Emphasis is placed on accuracy. However, the items are timed to more
precisely differentiate levels of dexterity. SAMUEL's score is consistent with individuals who can perform goal
-directed activities that involve small objects with accuracy and relatively fluid motions, though not quickly.
Individuals performing at this level can be expected to pick up and transfer about 10 to 15 pennies in 15 seconds
and place from 6 to 10 pegs into a pegboard in 15 seconds.
The Upper-Limb Coordination subtest consists off activities designed to measure visual tracking with
coordinated arm and hand movement. SAMUEL's score is consistent with individuals who generally can catch
a tennis ball that is tossed from 10 feet away about 75% of the time, dribble a tennis ball 5 to 10 times, and hit a
target with a tennis ball from 10 feet away about 50% of the time.
Report printed for: qa Report generated by BOT-2 ASSIST version 1.0
Report Date: 08/18/2006 Page 6 of 14 Copyright ©2006 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.
66
Appendix B continued:
List of Sample Report Components
Body Coordination
This motor-area composite measures control and coordination of the large musculature that aids in posture and
balance. SAMUEL's Body Coordination standard score is 44 (39-49). This corresponds to a percentile rank of
27. His performance in this area is Average for males his age.
SAMUEL earned a scale score of 19 (15-23) on the Bilateral Coordination subtest and a scale score of 8 (5-11)
on the Balance subtest. His Bilateral Coordination scale score falls in the Average range and his Balance scale
score falls in the Below Average range. His Bilateral Coordination age equivalent falls in the range of 6:9-6:11
and his Balance age equivalent falls in the range of Below 4. SAMUEL's Bilateral Coordination scale score is
significantly greater than his Balance scale score at the less than .01 level. A difference of this size can be
considered uncommon because it occurs in less than 5% of the norm sample.
The Bilateral Coordination subtest measures the motor skills involved in playing sports and many recreational
games. The tasks require body control, and sequential and simultaneous coordination of the upper and lower
limbs. SAMUEL's score is consistent with individuals who can perform coordinated arm/hand and leg/foot
movements when the limbs on the same sides of the body are synchronized, but have difficulty with coordinated
arm/hand and leg/foot movements when the limbs on the opposite sides of the body are synchronized.
The Balance subtest evaluates motor-control skills that are integral for maintaining posture when standing,
walking, or reaching. SAMUEL's score is consistent with individuals who can maintain stability in a fixed
position on both feet for more than 10 seconds and can stand on one leg for about 3 to 6 seconds, but have
difficulty standing on one leg when the eyes are closed.
This motor-area composite measures control and coordination of the large musculature involved in locomotion,
especially in recreational and competitive sports. SAMUEL's Strength and Agility standard score is 44 (38-50).
This corresponds to a percentile rank of 27. His performance in this area is Average for males his age.
SAMUEL earned a scale score of 11 (7-15) on the Running Speed and Agility subtest and a scale score of 14
(10-18) on the Strength subtest. Both scale scores fall in the Average range. His Running Speed and Agility
age equivalent falls in the range of 4:10-4:11 and his Strength age equivalent falls in the range of 5:4-5:5. The
difference between SAMUEL's scale scores on these subtests is not considered significant.
The Running Speed and Agility subtest assesses running speed and agility. SAMUEL's score is consistent with
individuals who can complete a 100-foot shuttle run course in under 13 seconds and can hop on one leg about 5
to 20 times, but have difficulty hopping on one leg from side to side more than 5 times.
The Strength subtest is designed to measure trunk strength, upper body strength, and lower body strength.
SAMUEL's score is consistent with individuals who can complete about 5 to 15 knee push-ups or sit-ups in 30
seconds and can jump forward about 30 to 54 inches from a stationary start.
67
Appendix B continued:
List of Sample Report Components
Comparison of BOT-2 motor-area composites can provide insight into an examinee's personal strengths and
weaknesses.
SAMUEL's performance across the motor-area composites reveals significant differences. The following
paragraphs describe the significant differences among SAMUEL's motor-area composite standard scores and
the frequency with which the differences occur in the norm sample.
SAMUEL's Manual Coordination standard score of 62 is significantly greater at the .01 level than his Fine
Manual Control standard score of 30. A difference of this size can be considered uncommon because it occurs
in less than 1% of the norm sample.
SAMUEL's Body Coordination standard score of 44 is significantly greater at the .01 level than his Fine
Manual Control standard score of 30. A difference of this size can be considered common because it occurs in
more than 10% of the norm sample.
SAMUEL's Strength and Agility standard score of 44 is significantly greater at the .01 level than his Fine
Manual Control standard score of 30. A difference of this size can be considered common because it occurs in
more than 10% of the norm sample.
SAMUEL's Manual Coordination standard score of 62 is significantly greater at the .01 level than his Body
Coordination standard score of 44. A difference of this size can be considered uncommon because it occurs in
less than 10% of the norm sample.
SAMUEL's Manual Coordination standard score of 62 is significantly greater at the .01 level than his Strength
and Agility standard score of 44. A difference of this size can be considered uncommon because it occurs in
less than 10% of the norm sample.
A personal strength or weakness is indicated when an examinee's motor-area composite standard score is either
substantially higher or substantially lower than his or her other motor-area composite standard scores. For
SAMUEL, Manual Coordination represents a personal strength. Fine Manual Control represents a personal
weakness.
68
Appendix B continued:
List of Sample Report Components
69
Appendix B continued:
List of Sample Report Components
70
Appendix B continued:
List of Sample Report Components
71
Appendix B continued:
List of Sample Report Components
72
Appendix B continued:
List of Sample Report Components
Parent/Caregiver Letter
Parent/Caregiver Letter
On 09/18/2006, SAMUEL completed the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition (BOT
-2). The BOT-2 measures hand and arm coordination, balance, mobility, and strength using fun activities like
drawing shapes, bouncing a ball, standing on a small balance beam, hopping on one foot, and performing sit-
ups.
The skills that the BOT-2 measures play an important role in everyday tasks, including drawing and writing,
using small objects, walking and running, and participating in recreational and competitive sports. Learning
about how an individual performs these tasks helps to identify special needs so that plans can be made to
accommodate these needs and develop programs to improve performance.
An individual's performance on the BOT-2 can be described by comparing his scores to the scores obtained by
the norm group. The norm group is a representative sample of individuals from across the United States. One
type of score, called the percentile rank, indicates the percentage of individuals from this group who performed
at or below a specific score. For example, a percentile rank of 20 indicates that 20% of the group performed at
or below that score.
SAMUEL's performances in the following motor skill areas are described below: Fine Manual Control, Manual
Coordination, Body Coordination, and Strength and Agility. Because SAMUEL completed all four parts of the
BOT-2, a comprehensive score from all four areas called the Total Motor Composite also is reported.
SAMUEL's scores were compared to a group of males his age.
SAMUEL's Total Motor Composite score corresponds to a percentile rank of 24, which is considered Average
for males his age.
SAMUEL's performance on Fine Manual Control, which measures the motor skills involved in writing,
drawing, and other tasks requiring a high degree of precision, corresponds to a percentile rank of 2, which is
considered Well-Below Average for males his age.
SAMUEL's performance on Manual Coordination, which measures coordination and control of the arms and
hands, especially for manipulating small objects and catching, bouncing, and throwing a ball, corresponds to a
percentile rank of 89, which is considered Above Average for males his age.
SAMUEL's performance on Body Coordination, which measures control of the large muscles that aide in
maintaining posture and balance, corresponds to a percentile rank of 27, which is considered Average for males
his age.
SAMUEL's performance on Strength and Agility, which measures upper and lower body strength and control of
the large muscles used in walking and running, corresponds to a percentile rank of 27, which is considered
Average for males his age.
More specific areas of motor performance within each assessed motor skills area are also reported. For each of
these specific areas, SAMUEL's score is rated well-above average, above average, average, below average, or
well-below average. SAMUEL's abilities in the Fine Manual Control skills area were Well-Below Average for
Fine Motor Precision and Below Average for Fine Motor Integration. SAMUEL's abilities in the Manual
Report printed for: qa Report generated by BOT-2 ASSIST version 1.0
Report Date: 08/18/2006 Page 13 of 14 Copyright ©2006 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.
73
Appendix B continued:
List of Sample Report Components
Coordination skills area were Above Average for Manual Dexterity and Above Average for Upper Limb
Coordination. SAMUEL's abilities in the Body Coordination skills area were Average for Bilateral
Coordination and Below Average for Balance. SAMUEL's abilities in the Strength and Agility skills area were
Average for Running Speed and Agility and Average for Strength.
Sincerely,
74
X090706X