Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TIA.2017.2766585, IEEE
Transactions on Industry Applications
0093-9994 (c) 2017 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TIA.2017.2766585, IEEE
Transactions on Industry Applications
2
for the design validation of optimized induction machine. The reach at the following interpretation:
FEM results confirmed that the torque ripples in the optimized 2 1 𝜋
IM have been reduced significantly and hence validate design 𝐹𝑞𝑘 (𝛼) = 𝑇 𝑖 sin (𝑘𝛾𝑞 ) cos[𝑘(𝛼 − 𝛼𝑐 )] (2)
𝜋 𝑞 𝑞𝑘 2
suggestions obtained from optimized IM model.
Each coil in the air-gap periphery is responsible for the
II. MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF INDUCTION MACHINE
production of kth indexed space harmonic. In the mathematical
A. Winding harmonics form it can be represented as follows:
∞
Mutual and self inductance calculation is considered the 2 1 𝜋
𝐹𝑐 (𝛼) = 𝑇𝑖 ∑ sin (𝑘𝛾𝑞 ) cos[𝑘(𝛼 − 𝛼𝑐 )] (3)
basis for most of the model formulations of the induction 𝜋 𝑞𝑞 𝑘 2
𝑘=1,𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑑𝑑
machines. Self inductances and the mutual inductances can For all the Nq coils of figure 3, of a particular q phase the
directly be connected with the winding formations. Different net MMF per phase can be determined from the superposition
types of winding corresponds to different types of pitch and of likewise harmonics of all the phase coils. Hence the
belt factors. expression for MMF changes in the following manner
To calculate the inductance first we need to determine the 𝑁𝑞
0093-9994 (c) 2017 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TIA.2017.2766585, IEEE
Transactions on Industry Applications
3
Limits for integration are given as given in (10) and (11) 𝑃 𝑑𝜚𝑞𝑟𝑘
𝑇𝑒 =
∑ ∑ ∑ 𝑖𝑞 𝑖𝑟 (19)
8 𝑘 𝑞 𝑟 𝑑𝜃
𝛼𝑅𝑞 𝛾𝑞 𝜋 Mentioned torque expression solved along with motor
𝛼𝑐′ = 𝛼𝑞 − (𝑁𝑞 − 2𝑐 + 1) − (10)
2 2 dynamics and current and voltage in order to determine the
𝛼𝑅𝑞 𝛾𝑞 𝜋 current response and torque response.
𝛼𝑐" = 𝛼𝑞 − (𝑁𝑞 − 2𝑐 + 1) + (11)
2 2 C. Effect of Slot Harmonics
In the effect of slot harmonics has been thoroughly
Using relation (4), (7) and (8), net mutual flux linkage of any investigated by authors and arrived on the following
two phases is given by expression for the inductance [8, 9]
2𝜋
𝑘′𝑞𝑟 𝑘𝑤𝑞𝑘 𝑘𝑤𝑟𝑘 −1 (𝑦,
(20)
𝜆𝑞𝑟 = 𝑖𝑟 cos[𝑘(𝛼𝑞 − 𝛼𝑟 )] (12) 𝐿𝐶1 𝐶2 = 𝜇0 𝑅𝐿 ∫ 𝑇𝐶1 (𝑦, 𝜃𝑟 )𝑀𝐶2 (𝑦, 𝜃𝑟 )𝑑𝑠𝑟 𝜃𝑟 )𝑑𝑦
𝑘2 0
Where the constant k'qr is given for: So this way the mutual inductance has been calculated
4𝑝𝐿𝐷𝜇0 𝑁𝑞 𝑁𝑟 𝑇𝑞 𝑇𝑟 which include the effect of slot harmonics. After the
𝑘′𝑞𝑟 =
𝜋𝑑 calculation of inductances the voltage current equations can be
and perfectly used to determine the exact machine behavior. Our
𝑘𝑤𝑞𝑘 = 𝑘𝑝𝑞𝑘 𝑘𝑑𝑞𝑘 is phase "q" winding factor main objective is to see the machine behavior in terms of the
𝑘𝑤𝑟𝑘 = 𝑘𝑝𝑟𝑘 𝑘𝑑𝑟𝑘 is phase "r" winding factor torque profile. So with these inductances the voltage and
Angular position of "q" phase axis is abbreviated as 𝛼𝑞 current equations are solved with Runge-Kutta differential
kthorder mutual harmonic flux linkage between any two numerical method along with the motor dynamics.
generic phases q and r is given by (8), which can be Hence the final torque representation can be exhibited in the
following format
𝜆𝑞𝑟𝑘 (13) 𝛿𝐿𝑠𝑠 𝛿𝐿𝑠𝑟
𝜚𝑞𝑟𝑘 = 𝑖𝑠 𝑖𝑠 𝑖𝑠 𝑖
𝑖𝑟 𝛿𝜃𝑟 𝛿𝜃𝑟 𝑟
abbreviated in form of (13) to give harmonics inductance. 𝑇𝑒 = (21)
𝛿𝐿𝑟𝑠 𝛿𝐿𝑟𝑟
𝑖𝑟 𝑖𝑠 𝑖𝑟 𝑖𝑟
[ 𝛿𝜃𝑟 𝛿𝜃𝑟 ]
𝜚𝑞𝑟𝑘 = 𝐿𝑞𝑟𝑘 𝑖𝑞 cos[𝑘(𝛼𝑞 − 𝛼𝑟 )]
(14)
D. Rotation Mechanics
Inserting the relation (12) in (13) gives the result as follows Electrical equation given in (16) is solved together with
Where 𝐿𝑞𝑟𝑘 is the abbreviation for the expression motor dynamics equations. With this procedure motor
𝑘′𝑞𝑟 𝑘𝑤𝑞𝑘 𝑘𝑤𝑟𝑘 response has been determined in terms of the torque and
𝐿𝑞𝑟𝑘 =
𝑘2 current waveforms. Motor dynamics are as follows
Ultimately we have arrived at the expression of the 𝑑2𝜃 𝑃 (22)
harmonic inductance which is given by expression (14). 2
= (𝑇𝑒 − 𝑇𝑙 )
𝑑𝑡 2𝐽
These harmonics in the inductance are due the space
arrangement of the winding.
𝑑𝜃 (23)
In voltage current generic phase flux is 𝜆𝑞 (where q is = 𝜔𝑚
𝑑𝑡
generalization for q=A,B,C,a,b,c.). The generalized flux
linkage 𝜆𝑞 is due the fundamental as well as harmonic All λ’s in voltage equations are determined collectively
components of the inductances. Hence general expression of using (15) and (20). For the solution of these equations Runge-
flux linkage is transformed into the following form: Kutta fourth order has been used.
𝜆 =𝐿 𝑖 +∑ ∑ 𝜚 𝑖 (15) Final Inductance expression including winding harmonics
𝑞 𝑞 𝑞 𝑞𝑟𝑘 𝑟
𝑘 𝑟 and slot effects is derived from (15) and (20) and given as (24)
Hence the voltage-current relation is given as 𝜆𝑞 (24)
𝑑𝑖𝑞 𝑑𝑖𝑟 𝑑𝜚𝑞𝑟𝑘 (16) 𝐿𝑞𝑟𝑘(𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙) = | + 𝐿𝐶1 𝐶2
𝑒𝑞 = 𝑅𝑞 𝑖𝑞 + 𝐿𝑞 + ∑ ∑ [𝜚𝑞𝑟𝑘 + 𝑖𝑟 ] 𝑖𝑟 𝑘≠1
𝑑𝑡 𝑘 𝑟 𝑑𝑡 𝑑𝑡
1 (17)
𝑊𝑐𝑜 = ∑ ∑ ∑ 𝜚𝑞𝑟𝑘 𝑖𝑞 𝑖𝑟 III. DESIGN OPTIMIZATION
2 𝑘 𝑞 𝑟
Torque response obtained by considering the slot harmonics
From the electromechanical energy conversion principles it
effect and winding harmonics using mathematical model has
is clear that the torque is the differential product of co-energy
large ripples. It has been shown in the mathematical analysis
function.
that the torque response is the function of the induction
The co-energy is given through currents in (17) and
machine design parameters. Hence an optimum design is
developed electromagnetic torque expression derived from
required to minimize the ripples in the torque response.
following derivative of torque.
Steady state ripples in the torque response are the prime
𝑃 𝛿𝑊𝑐𝑜 objective for the optimization. These ripples are cyclic in
𝑇𝑒 = | (18)
2 𝛿𝜃 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡
0093-9994 (c) 2017 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TIA.2017.2766585, IEEE
Transactions on Industry Applications
4
nature. Due to non-stochastic behavior and direct dependence the technique progresses. The simplest step is to replace the
on slot harmonics and winding harmonics ripples can easily be worst point with a point reflected through the centroid of the
optimized. Optimization has been run on a graphical user remaining N points. If this point is better than the best current
interface which provides different methods for optimization. It point, then we can try stretching exponentially out along this
have used Nelder-Mead simplex algorithm for the specified line. On the other hand, if this new point isn't much better than
problems optimization. This algorithm uses a simplex of n+1 the previous value, then we are stepping across a valley, So,
points for n-dimensional vector x. Vector x is the array of the we shrink the simplex towards a better point.
design variable of the induction machine. Initiation of the Complete design optimization strategy has been elaborated
problem solution starts with the formulation of the objective in Fig. 4. Overall design optimization procedure has been
function and then is called by the GUI. The specified divided into three steps named as modeling, optimization and
algorithm converses on only local solution and that is the main validation.
advantage of the algorithm as the problem is to find the Start
solution in small search space near to initial values of the
variables.
Objective function is the toque ripple which is the function
Actual machine design
of supply and machine design parameters. Supply is kept parameters
purely sinusoidal to observe the impact of machine design on
torque profile and a case study is also discussed for non-
Induction Development of mathematical
sinusoidal supply. The objective function of torque ripple is machine model including winding and
given in (27), which is the difference between maximum modeling slot harmonics
𝑡𝑠 +𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑡
1 Selection of optimization
𝑇𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛 = ∫ 𝑇𝑒 𝑑𝑡 = 𝑇𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑑 (26) variables
𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑡𝑠
where tint= Finite time to track the torque Optimization for torque ripple
ts = Settling time
Tmean = Average electromagnetic torque which is equal Optimization
to load torque in steady state for torque
ripple
∆𝑇 = 𝑇𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑥 − 𝑇𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑛
(27) Feasibility Fix the value of
check for all feasible variable
optimized and
∆𝑇 optimization on
∆𝑇(%) = ×100 (28) variables
𝑇𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛 remaining
variables
The variables used in the objective function are the no. of
slots per phase per pole, rotor and stator winding distribution
and the rotor and stator coil pitch. The main criterion to select
the optimization algorithm was to keep the design variables Torque response of
value near the initial values due to the feasibility of design optimized model
parameters. That is why a local optimum solution is required.
Winding distribution and pitch may be an integer value but Design
validation
number slots per phase per pole can be or cannot be an integer. Design verification and
So, for all the variables the integer programming also may not case study
help. Hence, with all selectivity constraints, Nelder-Mead
simplex algorithm was best suitable for the described
minimization problem. The overall minimization problem has End
been solved in iterative manner due to the feasibility
constraints of the design variables.
A. Nelder- Mead simplex algorithm: Fig. 4. Complete design optimization strategy
Nelder–Mead generates a new test position by extrapolating
the behaviour of the objective function measured at each test IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
point arranged as a simplex. The algorithm then chooses to The mathematical model of the induction machine has been
replace one of these test points with the new test point and So, simulated for a 3-phase, 50Hz, 440V, 1440 rpm, 5hp, star
0093-9994 (c) 2017 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TIA.2017.2766585, IEEE
Transactions on Industry Applications
5
connected induction machine. For the described mathematical parameters due to the unimodal search property of Nelder-
model of induction machine with objective function given in Mead optimization algorithm.
(27), optimization algorithm has been applied. For the
optimization, the considered independent variables are number With optimized design parameters, IM torque response has
of slots, coil pitch and winding distribution, as shown in Table been obtained using the mathematical model as shown in Fig.
I, are the design parameters of the IM. These parameters have 7. The value of torque ripple has been reduced to 0.22 % in the
been acquired using direct measurements on the IM available optimized design from 6.93% in the original design of IM as
in laboratory at IIT Mandi, as shown in Fig 5. A computer shown in Fig. 6 and 7. After the optimization, the number of
system with 64 bit processor and 16 Giga-bytes of RAM took stator as well as the rotor slots has been increased from 36 and
30 minutes to complete the 35 iteration of the optimization 24 to 42 and 26, respectively. Optimization result suggests that
algorithm. Stopping criteria for the optimization program was for the rotor winding there is a need of short pitching. This
the number of iterations. The objective of the problem was suppresses the forward rotating space harmonics (i.e. 5th
achieved but all the values of optimization variables were in harmonics). While stator winding has been over pitched,
non feasible zone i.e. non realisable for design of IM. which means it has been under pitched in backward rotation.
Optimized intermediate results are shown in the Table I. This will suppress the backward rotating space harmonics (i.e.
7th harmonics).
0093-9994 (c) 2017 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TIA.2017.2766585, IEEE
Transactions on Industry Applications
6
(b) (a)
0093-9994 (c) 2017 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TIA.2017.2766585, IEEE
Transactions on Industry Applications
7
(b)
(a)
(c)
(b)
Fig. 10. Finite Element Model of (a) Original Induction
(d) Machine (b) Optimized Induction Machine
Fig. 9: Response of optimized induction machine under
square wave voltage input (a) Torque response (b) Torque
ripple (c) Stator current (d) Speed response
B. Finite Element Model Design Validation
The performance of optimized design of induction
machine has been validated and compared with the
performance of original induction machine using finite
element modelling (FEM). The FEM have been developed
using the parameters of original IM and optimized IM and
shown in Fig. 10. Quarter symmetry has been considered (a)
while developing FEM of original IM. But the number of slots
per phase per pole is not an integer value in the optimized
model so complete cross section is required for the FEM
analysis as shown in Fig. 10(b.)
The performance of optimized IM has been compared with
the original IM using FEM, in the terms of torque, torque
ripple and stator currents as shown in Fig. 11 and 12.
Fig. 11(a) shows the rated torque response and ripples in the (b)
torque are as high as up to 40% as shown in Fig. 11(b). Stator
currents are not purely sinusoidal due to the presence of space
harmonics can be observed in Fig. 11(c).
(c)
Fig. 11. Original Induction Machine’s Response using finite
element modeling (a) Rated torque response, (b) Torque
ripple, (c) Stator currents
0093-9994 (c) 2017 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TIA.2017.2766585, IEEE
Transactions on Industry Applications
8
Fig. 12(a) shows the torque response and in Fig. 12(b) for the original IM.
ripples in the torque are reduced to 10% in optimized design Furthermore, for the validation of the optimized design
as compared to 40% in original design of IMs shown in Fig. parameters of IM, the finite element models (FEM) of original
11(b). Stator current of the optimized design of IM have been IM as well as optimized IM have been developed.
shown in Fig. 12 (c), are purely sinusoidal due to the absence Electromagnetic torque and stator currents have been obtained
of space harmonics. Hence it is evident that the torque ripples from both FEM models for performance comparisons. FEM
have been minimized to a least value in the optimized design results confirmed that proposed optimized design suggestions
of induction machine due to net reduction in space harmonics. are effective as the torque ripples in the optimized IM have
been reduced to 10 % as compared to 40 % of original IM.
Hence, IM design strategy proposed for minimized torque
ripples is effective and similar approach can be used for
application specific drive designs. Hence this paper has
presented an effective and efficient induction machine design
methodology for low torque ripples due to the interaction of
time and space harmonics.
(a)
REFERENCES
[1] T. Knopik and A. Binder, "Measurement proven analytical and
numerical models for calculation of the teeth flux pulsations and
harmonic torques of skewed squirrel cage induction machines," in
IEEE Energy Conv. Congress and Exposition ECCE, 2011, pp. 162-
169.
[2] S. Chattopadhyay, A. Chattopadhyaya and S. Sengupta, "Measurement
of harmonic distortion and Skewness of stator current of induction
machine at crawling in Clarke plane," in IET Science, Measurement &
Technology, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 528-536, 11 2014.
[3] N. R. Tavana and V. Dinavahi, "Real-Time FPGA-Based Analytical
(b) Space Harmonic Model of Permanent Magnet Machines for Hardware-
in-the-Loop Simulation," in IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 51,
no. 8, pp. 1-9, Aug. 2015.
[4] S. Keerthipati and K. K. Nallamekala, "UPSC SVPWM controlled
multi-level inverter topology for multiple pole-pair induction machine
drive for minimising torque ripple," in IET Power Electronics, vol. 9,
no. 6, pp. 1306-1314, 5 18 2016.
[5] M. Sowmiya, G. Renukadevi, and K. Rajambal, "IFOC of five-phase
induction machine drive," in International Conference on Power,
Energy and Control ICPEC 2013, pp. 304-309.
(c) [6] L. M. Neto, J. R. Camacho, C. H. Salerno, and B. P. Alvarenga,
Fig. 12. Optimized Induction Machine’s Response using "Analysis of a three-phase induction machine including time and space
harmonic effects: the a, b, c reference frame," IEEE Tran. on Energy
finite element modeling (a) Rated torque response, (b) Conv., vol. 14, pp. 80-85, 1999.
Torque ripple, (c) Stator currents [7] L. A. Roque, J. G. B. da Silva, and L. E. B. da Silva, "Sensorless speed
estimation for inductions motors using slot harmonics and time-based
frequency estimation," in 40th Annual Conference of the
V. CONCLUSIONS IEEEIndustrial Electronics Society, IECON 2014, pp. 857-862.
An induction machine (IM) mathematical model has been [8] S. Nandi, "Modeling of induction machines including stator and rotor
slot effects," IEEE Tran. on Industry Appns., vol. 40, pp. 1058-1065,
derived to consider the effect of slots and winding harmonics 2004.
on the developed electromagnetic torque. Two separate [9] A. K. Mishra and B. S. Rajpurohit, "Modeling of 3-phase induction
analyses have been carried out to include the winding and slot machine including slot effects and winding harmonics," in 6th IEEE
Power India International Conference PIICON 2014, pp. 1-6.
harmonics. Large ripples have been found in the torque output [10] A. K. Mishra, B. S. Rajpurohit and R. Kumar, "Design and development
of the IM while analyzing using the developed mathematical of efficient induction machine drive for reduced torque
model for sinusoidal supply voltage. For torque ripple pulsations," 2016 IEEE 6th International Conference on Power Systems
reduction, the mathematical model of IM has been subjected (ICPS), New Delhi, 2016, pp. 1-6
[11] "Nelder–Mead method," in Wikipedia,
to Nelder-Mead simplex optimization technique with number https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nelder%E2%80%93Mead_method.
of slot, winding distribution angle and coil pitch as variables [12] H. Yoon, M. Song, I. Kim, P. S. Shin and C. S. Koh, "Accuracy
which are design parameter of the IM. Optimization variables Improved Dynamic E&S Vector Hysteresis Model and its Application
to Analysis of Iron Loss Distribution in a Three-Phase Induction
are directly linked with the self and mutual inductances of the machine," in IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 887-
machine as described in (14), (21) and (24). The derivative of 890, Feb. 2012
the inductance determines the electromagnetic torque of IM. It
has been deduced that the harmonics associated with the self
and mutual inductance of the induction motor are the causes
for the torque ripple. It is found that torque response of the
optimized IM has been reduced to 0.22%, which was 6.93%
0093-9994 (c) 2017 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.