Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Abstract-Statistical best-fit kinetic and transport parameters are denved from temperature and yield profiles
observed in a pdot-plant catalytic reactor in whtch o-xylene IS oxldlsed with au to phthahc anhydride and Its
precursors Published data are used to begn the search routine and the tuned parameters are seen to be plaublble
The overall model has good extrapolattve power to the point where catalyst deactlvatlon becomes apparent
1323
1324 K CHANDILASEKHAFWN and P H CALLXERBANK
-yl g : R
-M
EM = k;, (p-f)
6
dT
- Y2 (T - Tc)
?iF= ,":I AP Rq.n
T
P = (P, P* PC PD: , p" = (PAS PBS PCS PDY
z = 0 p=pl
T = T
I
PI= 0 0 o>*
(PA , I
a
109.000 1 0 715 13560
13560 14668
13560 lx)21
13560 12228
13550 11099
P5 j 13560 13838
1
-2 -6
2 Y 10 7 221r x 10
0’
0q
36 8 89
1326 K CHANDRASEKHARAN
and P H CALDERBANK
pdot plant The close agreement m the prediction of the objective function can be altered m a favourable dlrec-
magmtude and position of hot spot temperature at other tlon rf U 1s allowed to increase from Its earlier estimated
operatmg condltmns can be seen from Figs 3-6 Further value to accommodate the larger heat release when E IS
anaiysn of the estunated rate constants revealed that the taken as carbon dioxtde The resultmg nine parameters
parameter estimates were highly correlated and the
activation energes were not well estimated In the sub-
sequent analysts wth E taken as carbon dioxide, the 603
613
t
0 IO 20 30 40 50 60 iv 60
Olstanca ma#sumd from the mactor inlet, EITI
653-
Fu 1 Temperature profiles for T, = Tc = 693K and Pnl =
001 atm - Expenmental profile, ----- PredIcted profile
obtamed by usmg tbe tuned model parameters, COX = CO2
(Tables 2 and 4). -- Predtcted profile obtamed by using the
tuned model parameters, COX = CO (Tables 2 and 3)
-0 IO 20 30 40 50 60 70 60
Distance measured from the reactor Inlet. cm
35x10-3<h,<5x10-3cmz ;$ “c
-3
U ) Cdl 2 63 x 10 3 43 x 10-3
-3
hf 1
) cm 2 set oc 3 75 x 10-3 3 87 x 10
3 ) 0 975 1 966
-0
s2 ; 1 015 1 807
)
glTlCJ1.S cl 296 0 760
ii"
gm set atm
3 ;
-0
% ; 1 010 3 182
9 1 r)50 3 281
5 ;
a2
*g--o_ Cl
-_
0.0
01- _ -:A-\ *
C NC c,JY -‘,’ - _
** -_z_------__
0 ----____
_L
,
t 09 -‘,
\
3
-ix
3 OS- \
\
8 ‘\\ v
__--
zo7-
\ 4-H’
E c-
\ x V.-
iS \
- 06 - .@
\ /
S \ v .’
\
,
1 os- , ,*-
\ I’
E : ,’
\ #
8 04- I
t
Jj Q3- Y’v
,’ ‘\*
g 02- \
/’
is 8.
r’V
‘.
Ol- ’ *.
.d x --__
--__ A
*o
-,*
10 m 30 40 50” 60
- -__
70--80
_.d
Distance msasumd from fhe reoctaq Ink& cm Dtstance mwsumd fram the reactor inlet. cm
Fq 7 Concentration profiles for TI = Tc = 693K and PAI = Rg 9 Concentration profiles for T, = Tc = 713K and PAI =
001 atm x o-xylene, Cl o-tolualdehyde. 0 phthahde, V 001 atm x o-xylene, Cl o-tolualdehyde, 0 phthahde, V
phthahc anhytide. ---- PredIcted profiles obtamed by usrng the phthahc anhydnde. ----- Predicted profiles obtamed by usmg the
tuned model parameters A, B, C and D refer to o-xylene, tuned model parameters A. B, C and D refer to o-xylene.
o-tolualdehyde, phthahde and phthahc anhydnde respectively, o-tolualdehyde. phthahde and phthahc anhydnde respectrvely,
COX = CO2 (Tables 2 and 4) COX = CO* (Tables 2 and 4)
was found by settmg both c and II, to high values This influenced to a larger extent by the presence or total
msensltwlty to interphase gradients occurs m spite of a absence of interphase gradients Marginal variations III
maxlmum predicted temperature dzfference of 32’C be- ~~ and h, have, however, practically no effect on the
tween the catalyst surface and the bulk phase Even for predicted concentration profiles The results are sum-
the extreme case TI = Tc = 753K, the predicted hot spot mansed in Figs 10 and 11
temperature is not affected by either increasing only II, From the foregoing It IS clear that the presence of a
or both k,” and /I~ by about 30% However, when U IS large number of adjustable parameters gives conslder-
decreased by 23%, the predicted hot spot temperature able flexlbdlty m tunmg the data to handle the two
increases by 28°C The concentration profiles of the
mtermediates, o-tolualdehyde and phthahde, are
/\
673 -
/ 1
764-
744-
IO 20 30 40 50 60 70 60
Distance mearumd from the reaclvr tnbt. cm
0 IO 30 40 50 70 60
Distance mearumd from the reactor inlet. cm F@ 10 Influence of transport parameters on the predicted tem-
perature profile T, = Tc = 753K. PA I = 0 01 atm. COX = CO,,
l?g 8 Effect of doubhng mass velocrty at the reactor mlet Refer Tables 2 and 4. ------ k,‘, k, and U as given m Table 4,
TI=644K, Tc=691K, U=383xlO-‘cal/cm’ set “C, kSz= ------ k.1 and U as given m Table 4. only II~IS Increased by
m, h,=m, - Expenmental profile, --- Predicted profile 29%, ---- kg= IS Increased by 28% and h, by 29%. U as
obtamed by usmg the tuned model parameters, COX= Co2 given m Table 4, --- k.” and h, as given m Table 4. U
(Tables 2 and 4), -- PredIcted profile obtamed by usmg the IS decreased by 23%. kg* and h, set to high values,
tuned model parameters, COX = CO (Tables 2 and 3) U as gven In Table 4
PredIction of packed-bed catalytw reactor performance 1329
= 693% TI = 753?X
TI
Redox f-t
E = carbon dioxide 1 11 x 10-6 1 49 x 10-6
Table I)
Redox format
E = ca~bonmnoxide 1 21 Y 10 -6 1 70 x lo+
Table 3
Linear kinetics -6 -6
Table 2 130x10 2 86 x 10
1330 K CHANDRASEKHARAN
and P H CALDERBANK
NOTATION
specific area of catalyst, cm3/g
heat capacity of the feed stream,
Cal/g “C
pellet diameter, cm
reactor tube diameter, cm
estimate of actlvatlon energy of rate
constant s, cal~gmole
estimate of actlvatlon energy of oxygen
adsorptlon or reoxtdatlon rate constant
k,, callgmole
mass velocity, g/cm’ set
13ktar.a measured from ti reactor inlet. cm
mterphase heat transfer coefficient,
Fuz 12 Elfect of mcreasmg 0-xylene partial pres- Cal/cm’ set “C
sure at the reactor mlet to 0 015 atm IF,= Tc = 693K, - estimate of pre-exponential factor of k,,
Expenmental profile, 1 Unsteady stat& 2 Steady state, 3 gmole/gm set atm
Steady state with PAI reduced from 0 015 atm to 0 01 atm, ----
interphase mass transfer coefficient.
PredIcted profile obtained by using the tuned model parameters,
PAI = 0 015 atm and COX = CO2 (Tables 2 and 4), - Predlc- gmole/cm’ set atm
ted profile obtamed by usmg the tuned model parameters, PA I = average molecular weight of the feed
0 015 atm and COX = CO (Tables 2 and 3) stream, gm/gmole
storchlometnc coefficient (subscripts I, 2,
etc refer to the steps m the network)
partial pressure, atm (subscnpts A, B,
the start up Use of a tubular-wall-coated-reactor fol- etc refer to the components, suffix I
lowed by the conventional packed-bed reactor could refers to the mlet condltlon, super-
reduce temperature gradients near the Inlet remon and scripts 0 and s refer to the observed
prolong the life of the catalyst value and catalyst surface condltlons
respectively
CONCLUSIONS average oxygen partial pressure, atm
The performance of a large packed-bed reactor could total pressure, atm
be predIcted fairly well by a kmetrc model havmg the net disappearance rate, gmolelg set
‘Redox format’ The presence of a large number of (subscripts A, B, etc refer to the com-
kinetic parameters made tt difficult to obtam a precise ponents, subscrlpts 1, 2, etc refer to
estimate of the actlvatlon energies of the rate constants the steps m the network)
from the pllot plant measurements, although the reactor estimate of pre-exponential factor of s,
model with tuned kmetlc parameters possessed a gmolejgm set atm
reasonable extrapolative power m the region of low temperature, K (superscrlpts 0 and s
parametnc sensmvlty, provided u-reversible catalyst refer to the observed value and the
deactlvatlon does not take place The very low value for catalyst surface temperature respec-
k, found necessary to explam the performance of the tlvely, subscripts I and C refer to the
reactor IS hkely to be due to loss of active sttes or mlet condltlon and coolant temperature
dlffuslon of oxygen Ions from the bulk lattice to the respectively)
surface becommg rate controlhng as a consequence of overall heat transfer coefficient,
temperature induced stractural modification of the cata- cal/cm* set “C
lyst Since the degree of deactwatlon ~111be more severe weight factors, atm* or OC* (subscnpts A,
near the inlet zone than at the tall end of the bed, the B, etc refer to the responses)
actlvlty profile of the catalyst IS dependent on the axial co-ordinate, cm
developing temperature profiles which are themselves refer to o-xylene, o-tolualdehyde,
influenced by the mltlal actlvlty of the fresh batch of phthahde, phthahc anhydrlde and car-
catalyst, the mlet condltlons of the fixed-bed and on bon oxide respectively
packed-bed dynamics The deactivation effects can be
either reversible or IrreverslbIe depending on the past Greek symbols
hlstory of the catalyst A certam amount of empuical YI GdW&iM -ebb)),
approxlmatlon IS mevltable m modellmg a krnetlc net- gmole cmJg set atm
work that IS extravagantly characterlsed by a large ~2 NJiJtd,G&‘~h cm-’
PredIctIon of packed-bed catalytic reactor performance 1331