PPAP Review Process Guide Purchasing Representative ____________________

Supplier: Part Number:

Sent to Tech Rev ________________: Rev Comp'l ________________ Sent to Engr Review____________ : Rev comp'l ___________
Number Open FMEA Actions ________________ Risk: Low Moderate High
Audit Items Result Comments
GENERAL Yes No
1. Are all applicable elements, as required by the submission checklist, included?
2. Is customer PPAP checklist included and complete?
3. Is Part #, Description, and Revision level documented and correct?
4. Do elements submitted correlate to submission level requested?
5. Submitted in a timely manner per purchasing instructions?

1. WARRANT [PSW] Yes No

1. Are all required sections filled in by supplier?
2. Is appropriate submission level checked?
3. Are submission results marked?
4. Is production rate indicated in the Declaration?
5. Is warrant signed by appropriate supplier quality representative?

2. DESIGN RECORDS Yes No

1. Are customer print(s) included to correct revision level?
2. Are prints of components and details included?
3. Is CAD/CAM math data submitted?
4. If there is no customer print, are supplier prints included?
5. Are all print dimensions (including specs., mtl., & notes) numbered?
6. For an Aluminum or Zinc Casting, are "Casting Production Specification"
forms E06M001A or E06M001B included.

3. AUTHORIZED ENGINEERING CHANGE DOCUMENTS Yes No

1. If submitting to design records undergoing engineering change not yet officially
incorporated, are authorized engineering change documents included?

4. ENGINEERING APPROVAL Yes No

1. Is engineering approval provided where required?
Note: Only applies when required on HD part drawing or specification.

S06A001C Rev. 3 4/3/2001 Page 1 of 5 10/15/2010 06:22:28

 PPAP Review Process Guide Purchasing Representative ____________________

Supplier: Part Number:

5. DESIGN FAILURE MODE & EFFECTS ANALYSIS [DFMEA] Yes No
1. If supplier is responsible for design is DFMEA included?
2. If customer did DFMEA, is it included for reference?
3. Are potential failure modes included?
4. Are potential effects of failure recorded?
5. Are potential cause(s)/mechanism(s) of failure recorded?
6. Are current process controls recorded?
7. Are severity / occurrence / detection levels assigned (rank 1-10)?
8. Are RPN numbers calculated (severity x occurrence x detection) and noted?
9. Are recommended action(s) and results recorded for high RPN numbers?
10. Are dates and person responsible noted for each recommended action?
11. Are all KPC(s) and KCC(s) (special characteristics) included?
12. Are part number and revision level noted ?

6. PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAMS [PFD] Yes No

1. Is process graphically shown?
2. Are all steps of process included (outside services)?
3. Are part number and revision level noted?
4. Are machine names and/or numbers included?

7. PROCESS FAILURE MODE & EFFECTS ANALYSIS [PFMEA] Yes No

1. Does FMEA follow process flow and are all process steps included in FMEA?
2. Are potential failure modes included?
3. Are potential effects of failure recorded?
4. Are potential cause(s)/mechanism(s) of failure recorded?
5. Are current process controls recorded?
6. Are severity / occurrence / detection levels assigned (rank 1-10)?
7. Are RPN numbers calculated (severity x occurrence x detection) and noted?
8. Are recommended action(s) and results recorded for high RPN numbers?
9. Are dates and person responsible noted for each recommended action?
10. Are all KPC(s) and KCC(s) (special characteristics) included?
11. Are part number and revision level noted?

S06A001C Rev. 3 4/3/2001 Page 2 of 5 10/15/2010 06:22:30

 PPAP Review Process Guide Purchasing Representative ____________________

Supplier: Part Number:

8. DIMENSIONAL RESULTS Yes No
Note: Can be tabulated for ballooned print or shown on drawing check print.
1. Are actual results recorded for two samples (or for # of samples requested)?
2. Are specification and tolerance included to compare to result?
3. Are results recorded for all dimensions, specifications, and notes?
4. Do results fall within specification limits?
5. Is part # and revision level documented?
6. Are KPC & KCC dimensions identified?

9. MATERIAL, PERFORMANCE, & DURABILITY TEST RESULTS Yes No

1. Are test results included for all tests required by the design record and related specifications?
2. Do actual results meet requirements?
3. Is material what is specified on design record?
4. Are performance & durability results included as specified?
5. Do reports show who performed tests, date of test, number parts tested, change level of
parts tested, and change level of specification parts were tested to?
6. Are there tests for all GES, ASTM, and other referenced specifications?
7. If applicable, is "Foundry Trial Plan Summary' attached. [E06M001C]

10. INITIAL PROCESS CAPABILITY RESULTS Yes No

1. Are control charts submitted which show a stable, in-control, process?
Note: Histograms do not show stability and are not acceptable unless agreed to in writing prior to submission.
2. Are capability results reported for all KPCs & KCCs?
3. Do results equal 1.67 or greater for first time capability?
4. If results represent ongoing results is CpK 1.33 or greater?

11. MEASUREMENT SYSTEM ANALYSIS STUDIES Yes No

1. Are results reported for each KPC & KCC measurement tool?
2. Are R&R results >10%?
3. If R&R results >10% to < 30%, is there documented evidence of review for acceptability?
4. Are R&R results > 30%?
5. Are attribute studies reported for attribute gauging?
6. Was Measurement Systems Analysis performed on all checking aids?

S06A001C Rev. 3 4/3/2001 Page 3 of 5 10/15/2010 06:22:31

 PPAP Review Process Guide Purchasing Representative ____________________

Supplier: Part Number:

12. QUALIFIED LABORATORY DOCUMENTATION (as required) Yes No
1. Is A2LA certification provided of accreditation to ISO/IEC Guide 25.
2. Is laboratory accredited for tests conducted.

13. CONTROL PLAN Yes No

1. Does control plan follow the process flow and PFMEA, are all process steps included?
2. Are all KPC(s) & KCC(s) listed with control method, including capability
tracking and reporting where possible?
3. Are KPCs specially marked (highlighted) within Control Plan?
4. Are product / process specification / tolerance reported for each control step?
5. Are evaluation/measurement techniques reported?
6. Is sample size and frequency reported for each characteristic?
7. Are control methods recorded?
8. Are reaction plans recorded?
9. Are part number and revision level noted?
10. Are all special gages and/or fixtures noted?
11 Are "Checking Aids" identified on control plan by gage number as shown on warrant?

14. COSMETIC VALIDATION REPORT Yes No

1. Is part cosmetic (cosmetic zones defined)?
If no, cosmetic validation report not required.
2. Is cosmetic validation from completed and acceptable?

15. BULK MATERIAL CHECKLIST (Bulk Material PPAP only) Yes No

1. Are Bulk Material requirements and Checklist applicable?
2. Are target dates entered for each item with customer / supplier responsibility identified?
3. Is there an approval date for each item?

16a. SAMPLE FOR LAYOUT Yes No

1. Was sample(s) provided in accordance with submission level?
2. If submission level 2 or 3, was part(s) sent to specified site for customer layout and approval?
3. Was layout submission acceptable?

S06A001C Rev. 3 4/3/2001 Page 4 of 5 10/15/2010 06:22:33

 PPAP Review Process Guide Purchasing Representative ____________________

Supplier: Part Number:

16b. COSMETIC / STYLING SAMPLE(S) Yes No
1. Was sample(s) provided in accordance with submission level?
2. If submission level 2 or 3, was part(s) sent to specified site for customer layout and approval?
3. Was cosmetic / styling submission acceptable?

17. MASTER SAMPLE TO BE RETAINED BY SUPPLIER

18. CHECKING AIDS SPECIFIC TO THE PART BEING SUBMITTED Yes No

1. See Part Submission Warrant to verify checking aids are noted.
2. Are correct Engineering Change Level and date shown on Warrant?
3. See Control Plan to verify checking aids are noted.
4. Is there evidence "all aspects of the checking aid agree with part dimensional requirements"?

19. CUSTOMER-SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS Yes No

1. Are there Customer-Specific requirements (must be specified on attachment
to Submission Checklist)?
2. Do records indicate supplier has complied with these requirements?

S06A001C Rev. 3 4/3/2001 Page 5 of 5 10/15/2010 06:22:35