01-06-15 Packet For Adjourned Regular Engineering and Operations Committee Meeting

AGENDA
ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE

ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
JANUARY 06, 2015
9:00 AM
Call To Order
Public Comments
Discussion Items:
1. Professional Services Agreement with Water Works Engineers, LLC for

Design of the Flagler Well Pipeline Connection to Temescal Valley
Pipeline
2. Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Krieger &

Stewart for Additional Design Engineering Services for the Pottery Street
Sewer Project and Relocation of the Sewer in San Joaquin Drive West
Project
3. Award of Construction Contract to Downing Construction, Inc. for the

Tuscany Trunk Sewer and Flow Control Structure Project
4. Encina Drive Abandoned Booster Pump Station Property Sale
5. Other
6. Consider Items for Board Review
7. Adjourn
Posted
31315 Chaney Street 12/30/14 10:13 AM
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
ENGINEERING AND
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE DISCUSSION OUTLINE
Date: January 6, 2015
Originator: Warren Huang - Engineering
Subject: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WATER

WORKS ENGINEERS, LLC FOR DESIGN OF THE FLAGLER
WELL PIPELINE CONNECTION TO TEMESCAL VALLEY
PIPELINE
BACKGROUND AND RECOMMENDATION
As a response to the drought, increased demand for water, and the rising cost of
imported water, staff has been evaluating new water sources. The new water supply
resources evaluation was presented by staff at the April 30, 2014 Board Meeting, with
the Flagler Wells being one of the new sources.
The Flagler Wells are existing wells that are currently used for supplying irrigation water.
The wells were originally developed in the late 1890s and were used for irrigation and
potable use. In 1948, the Temescal Water Company drilled new wells and utilized the
wells for irrigation. In 2007, the wells were abandoned and new wells drilled nearby to
accommodate a land development project. These wells draw from the Bedford Basin.
In June of 1989, the Temesecal Water Company investigated whether the wells could be
used for potable water and determined that they could. Staff recently evaluated water
quality and potential surface water influences to determine if the water was still
acceptable as a potable supply and determined that it was.
Converting the wells to potable use will require constructing a pipeline to connect the
wells to the Temescal Valley Pipeline, boosting the system pressure to accommodate
the connection, and providing disinfection facilities for the water. On September 29,
2014, staff requested proposals from eight (8) engineering firms to provide engineering
design services for the Flagler improvements. Six (6) proposals were received on
October 23, 2014 and evaluated by staff. Proposals were evaluated per the criteria
shown on the attached table.
The evaluation indicated that Water Works Engineers and Krieger & Stewart had
essentially the same score and were deemed the two highest qualified proposers. The
cost proposals for Water Works Engineers and Krieger & Stewart were subsequently
evaluated, with Water Works Engineer's cost proposal being $142,000 less than Krieger
& Stewart's. Staff determined that Waterworks' cost proposal addressed the Project
scope at the best value.
Staff plans to present this item at the January 22, 2015 Board meeting. After careful
review, staff recommends approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Water
Works Engineers, LLC, for a not-to-exceed amount of $337,653. This item, including
overhead of $16,883 as well as staff time and fringe benefits of $73,023.30, totals
$427,559.30.
ENVIRONMENTAL WORK STATUS
The Project will require an evaluation of the environmental impacts and necessary
actions. This evaluation is part of the scope of work proposed for Water Works
Engineers, LLC.
FISCAL IMPACT
• Within Budget – Yes. See attached page.
Attachments:
Fiscal Impact
Water Works Proposal
Water Works Fee Proposal
Location Map
FISCAL IMPACT
• Funding Source:
o Fund 319 – Temescal Water Replacement Fund
Amount
Funding Budgeted FY14-15 $ 1,100,000
Expended / Committed to Date (9,149)
Balance Available $ 1,090,851
Requested Amount (427,559) *
Remaining Balance $ 663,292
Breakdown of Expended/Committed to Date
Staff Time/Fringe Benefits 8,541
Overhead 108
Lab Testing 500
Total $ 9,149
* The requested amount includes 310 hours of staff time
Requisition No. 24946
Activity No. 7587701DE01

P R O P O S A L
ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT

PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR
FLAGLER WELL CONVERSION PIPELINE
PROJECT NUMBER 75877
OCTOBER 23, 2014

October 23rd, 2014 Principals
James J. Geselbracht, P.E.
Sami A. Kader, P.E.
Angelo Heidt, Purchasing Supervisor John H. Matta, P.E.
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
31315 Chaney Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92531
RE: Proposal to Provide Engineering Services

Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD)
Flagler Wells Conversion Pipeline Project (No. 75877)
Proposal
Dear Mr. Heidt:
Enclosed please find Water Works Engineers proposal to provide engineering services for the EVMWD
Flagler Wells Conversion Pipeline Project (No. 75877). As requested, we have included five bound hard
copies, one .pdf copy on CD and a separate sealed envelope with our cost proposal. We acknowledge
receipt Addendum 1 dated October 7th, 2014 and Addendum 2 dated October 12th, 2014. Our approach to
the scope of work is detailed in our proposal, which generally is in conformance with the scope stated in the
RFP. We have reviewed the PSA and are willing to sign it in its current form.
Water Works Engineers has assembled a focused team of experts for this project. Our main project office
for this project will be our Gardena office (1515 W 190th Street, Ste. 428, Gardena, CA 90248) Andrew
Borgic, out of our Gardena Office will manage the project with local Project Engineering support from Gilbert
Fuentes (also in Gardena). Technical oversight will be provided by Sami Kader (on chemical feed systems
and chloramination approach) and Mike Fisher (on pipeline design). We have kept the team small and
focused in order to provide EVMWD with the most efficient team to execute the work effectively.
We have done our homework, examined the data, and developed an in-depth understanding of the key
project issues. The project team proposed worked together on the key issues analysis and understands that
those key issues (pipeline alignment, land ownership, access to chemical feed stations, chemical feed in a
high pressure pipeline, adequate timing for free chlorination and chloramination control) are all strongly
interrelated and required an integrate analysis to develop a project which encompass all of the key project
issues. We are prepared to provide that integrated analysis and have assembled a team uniquely qualified
to do so.
If you have any questions or would like any additional information, please feel free to contact Andrew at
310-750-7921 or me at 530-355-7646. We look forward to the opportunity to work for you.
Very Truly Yours

WATER WORKS ENGINEERS, LLC
Sami Kader, P.E., Principal Andrew Borgic, P.E., Project Manager
Water Works Engineers, LLC

TABLE OF CONTENTS
COMPANY PROFILE ................................................................................... 1
SERVICES ............................................................................................................................................................. 2
LOCATIONS.......................................................................................................................................................... 8
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING ....................................................................... 9

Project Goals ....................................................................................................................................................... 9
Project Background ............................................................................................................................................. 9
Project Approach .............................................................................................................................................. 11
Issue #1 – Pipeline Alignment CONSTRAINTS, SELECTION AND DESIGN ................................................... 11
Issue #2 – Agency Coordination, Permitting and Right of Way ................................................................ 14
Issue #3 – Chemical Feed Facility Design and Siting ................................................................................. 15
SCOPE OF WORK ..................................................................................... 17

Task 1 – Project Review .................................................................................................................................... 18
Task 2 – Kick-off Meeting and Discussion of Project Review Findings .............................................................. 19
Task 3 – Preliminary Design .............................................................................................................................. 19
Subtask 3.1 – Utility Research and Agency Contact.................................................................................. 20
Subtask 3.2 – Potholing............................................................................................................................. 21
Subtask 3.3 – Environmental documentation ........................................................................................... 22
Subtask 3.4 – Preliminary Design Route Selection .................................................................................... 26
Subtask 3.5 – Preliminary Design Report (PDR) ........................................................................................ 28
Task 4 – Base Sheet Preparation....................................................................................................................... 30
Subtask 4.1 – Aerial Mapping ................................................................................................................... 30
Subtask 4.2 – Field Survey ......................................................................................................................... 30
Subtask 4.3 – Boundary Survey with Legal Descriptions........................................................................... 30
Task 5 – Geotechnical ....................................................................................................................................... 31
Subtask 5.1 – Soil borings ......................................................................................................................... 31
Subtask 5.2 – Geotechnical Report ........................................................................................................... 32
FINAL DESIGN.................................................................................................................................................... 33
Task 6 – 75% Design Submittal ......................................................................................................................... 34
Task 7 – 95% Design Submittal ......................................................................................................................... 35
Task 8 – 100% Design Submittal ....................................................................................................................... 36
Task 9 – Bidding Services .................................................................................................................................. 36
Task 10 – Construction Services ........................................................................................................................ 37
Task 11 – QA/QC and Project Administration ................................................................................................... 37
Task 12 – Meeting and Communication ........................................................................................................... 38
Subtask 12.1 - Design Meetings ................................................................................................................ 38
Subtask 12.2 – Communication ................................................................................................................ 38
Subtask 12.3 - Special Meetings ............................................................................................................... 39
Task 13 – Project Design Schedule .................................................................................................................... 39
Task 14 – Right Of Way..................................................................................................................................... 39
Scope of Services
Water Works Engineers and Flagler Wells Conversion Pipeline Project No. 75877
Page | TOC
Subtask 14.1 – Pipeline (Optional) ............................................................................................................ 39
Subtask 14.2 – Ammonia Feed Siting (Optional) ...................................................................................... 39
Subtask 14.3 – Encroachment Permitting ................................................................................................. 39
Scope of Work: Man-Hours by Task .................................................................................................................. 41
SCHEDULE ............................................................................................... 43
RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL ....................................................................... 46
Project Team Organization ............................................................................................................................... 46
Water Works Engineers .................................................................................................................................... 47
Sami Kader, P.E ......................................................................................................................................... 47
Mike Fisher, P.E ......................................................................................................................................... 47
Jim Geselbracht, P.E .................................................................................................................................. 47
Gilbert Fuentes, P.E. .................................................................................................................................. 48
Jeremy Kellogg, P.E., S.E............................................................................................................................ 48
Greg Fron, P.E. .......................................................................................................................................... 48
Craig Worrall, C.E.T. .................................................................................................................................. 48
Group Delta Consultants, Inc. ........................................................................................................................... 49
Andregg Geomatics .......................................................................................................................................... 49
Dudek ................................................................................................................................................................ 49
ZZ Technology ................................................................................................................................................... 50
VCI Construction, Inc. ........................................................................................................................................ 50
PROJECT MANAGEMENT ......................................................................... 51

Project Management Tool #1 – Preliminary Design Report ............................................................................. 51
Project Management Tool #2 – Quality Control and Technical Review............................................................ 51
Project Management Tool #3 – Project Schedule ............................................................................................. 52
Project Management Tool #4 – Monthly Metrics Assessment ......................................................................... 52
Cost Control............................................................................................................................................... 52
Schedule Control ....................................................................................................................................... 53
Change Management ............................................................................................................................... 53
RELATED EXPERIENCE .............................................................................. 54

Calaveras County Water District Ebbetts Pass Water System Reach 3a Pipeline Replacement ....................... 54
San Jose Water Company McKean Road Reservoir and Pipeline Design Project.............................................. 55
City of Folsom Wet Infrastructure Replacement Program................................................................................ 56
California Water Service Company Dominguez Well 275-01 and 294-01 Treatment Project .......................... 57
Northern California Power Agency and Lake County Sanitation District Bear Canyon 0 Pump Station ........... 58
South Placer Municipal Utility District Upper Antelope Creek East Trunk Sewer ............................................. 59
REQUIRED DOCUMENTS .......................................................................... 60

Exhibit B ............................................................................................................................................................ 60
Exhibit C ............................................................................................................................................................ 61
Acceptability of District Professional Services Agreement................................................................................ 62
Scope of Services
Page | TOC
APPENDIX - RESUMES ............................................................................. 63
Scope of Services
Page | TOC
COMPANY PROFILE
Water Works Engineers was formed in 2005 by engineers who believed that water wastewater engineering and
consulting could be done a better way, by combining the best attributes of large and small engineering and
consulting firms: the technical expertise and resources of large firms and the personal attention to EVMWD
specific needs of small firms. Our vision was the formation and growth of a new kind of engineering firm, a firm
built on providing exceptional EVMWD service from highly experienced engineers in a “hands-on” highly
interactive and enjoyable environment.
To accomplish our vision, Water Works Engineers provides high-level staffing on every project with a leaner
overall firm structure that is focused on delivering high quality work for EVMWD-specific needs. We focus solely
on water and wastewater treatment, distribution and collections infrastructure. This focus makes us efficient,
keeps us up to date, and allows us to provide the highest level of service.
Since 2005, we have grown to more than 40 engineers and designers, using targeted recruitments of highly
skilled individuals, with annual revenues of over $10M. Our engineering and design staff has more than 375
years of combined experience in planning, design, construction
administration and operations services for water and wastewater
facilities. Since the beginning, Water Works Engineers has provided “During the entire design process for the
our EVMWDs with efficient-high quality work on over 350 separate upgrade of our treatment plant, Water
water and wastewater infrastructure projects. We average 50 Works Engineers was focused on
projects a year of sizes varying from $10,000 to $50M. constructability and operability. When I
talked, they listened, and they
To serve our EVMWDs throughout the Western United States, incorporated almost all of my ideas and
Water Works Engineers has offices and employees based in Los suggestions into the finished product. I
Angeles, Oakland, Redding, Roseville, San Mateo, and Mount Shasta also found the level of communication
CA, as well as Scottsdale, AZ, and Salt Lake City, UT. Water Works to be very client oriented. Any time I
Engineers is licensed in many other states as well and has provided left a message for Sami (Kader), Scott
(Buecker), and Tom (Frisch), they got
engineering for projects in many other states, including Nevada,
back to me the same day. That is good
New Mexico, Hawaii, and Oregon.
customer service!”
Water Works Engineers brings extensive experience in the planning
Clay Suskin,
and design of water and wastewater pumping, conveyance, and
Chief Operator, Lucerne WTP
treatment systems. Our expertise includes both process and California Water Service Company
process‐mechanical design of facilities with a broad range of size
and complexity to ensure that the facility will provide long‐term,
reliable and cost‐effective performance. We are committed to providing well thought-out projects that meet
our EVMWD’s schedule and budget exceed expectations for quality, efficiency and attention to detail. Our
team’s principals and staff have extensive experience with facilities representing a broad range of size and
complexity and continually strive to provide practical approaches to projects. Our focus and work approach
allow us to provide high-quality planning and design products very efficiently.
Scope of Services
Page | 1
SERVICES
WATER AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT

FACILITY PLANNING AND PERMITTING
Preliminary project planning for any water or
wastewater treatment facility involves the definition
of the performance requirements, the selection of
the most cost-effective treatment process or
equipment type, and laying out the facility to provide
for future growth, economy and ease of operation.
Water Works Engineers are experienced in a wide variety of technologies. We don’t bring cookie-cutter
solutions. We consider a wide variety of evaluation criteria when recommending an option, and make sure to
consider your particular needs. Water Works Engineers project planning services include:
 Treatability Studies
 Process Analysis and Optimization
 Pilot Studies
 Permitting Assistance
 EIR Preparation Assistance
 Phasing and Implementation Planning
 Water Supply Studies
 Energy Efficiency Evaluations
 Hydraulic Modeling (Pump, Water Distribution and Sewage Collection Systems)
 Life Cycle Cost Analyses
 Operation and Maintenance Workload Planning and Optimization
WATER AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESS DESIGN
Water Works Engineers has designed several water and wastewater treatment plants that are successfully
operating. Water Works Engineers is experienced and adept in all facets of water and wastewater treatment
process design, including:
 Identification of the most appropriate and cost-effective
treatment process for the EVMWD’s needs
 Selection of treatment processes, technologies and equipment
 Optimal sizing of the treatment system’s components
 Specification, layout and optimization of the equipment, piping,
valving and instrumentation
 Coordination of mechanical design with process &
instrumentation diagrams and electrical requirements
 Development of treatment process control narratives, control
loop descriptions and operating guidelines
Water Works Engineers selects and designs treatment processes that

reliably meet or exceed treatment goals and are easily operated by
Scope of Services
Page | 2
treatment plant staff while minimizing capital and O&M costs.
Water Works Engineers uses both commercial and custom-developed tools for design, including the following:
 Activated Sludge Model 1 (ASM1 and Biowin by Envirosim for biological treatment process simulation
and design
 Aeration System Calculations
 Hydraulic Calculations for Process Profile, including AFT Fathom for pressurized fluid system simulation
and design
 Plant-wide Water, Mass and Energy Balances
 Cogeneration Feasibility Analysis
 MINEQL+ and WaterPRO for water chemistry modeling
COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM PLANNING AND DESIGN

Water Works Engineers understand that the infrastructure outside the treatment plant (water distribution
and wastewater collection systems) is often a City’s single largest investment. We pride ourselves to deliver,
on schedule and within budget, innovative and quality work products in all phases of a project. We have
extensive experience in gravity and pressurized pipelines; booster pumps and lifts stations; steel and
concrete storage tanks; metering and pressure reducing facilities; water quality monitoring stations;
manholes and junction structures. Our experience includes 90-inch interceptor design all the way down to
small backyard residential lateral and mainline replacements. We have experience with vertical turbine
wet/dry well solids-handling self-cleaning sewage pumps stations, as well as smaller “duplex” and “air-pot”
package stations. From 15-MGD booster pumps stations with 5-MG pre-stressed concrete storage tanks and
complex water age mitigation controls to 200,000-gallon bolted steel tanks serving 50 homes via a gravity
pipeline, we have the experience.
Water Works Engineers have completed water distribution computer models for large cities and 50
connection developments. These models have supported regional water supply planning efforts and simple
utility connections. Our engineers have utilized multiple water and wastewater hydraulic modeling
platforms (Sewer/WaterCAD, Water/SewerGEMS, InfoWater/Sewer, H2ONet, etc.) to complete extended
period simulation computer models to analyze and identify current and future pipeline capacity upgrades, as
well as develop mitigation recommendations for water quality concerns.
Our planning and design efforts often

facilitated the extension of utility service to
communities previously not served; extended
the life of existing infrastructure through
rehabilitation/repair; or provided new
facilities to replace aging infrastructure. Our
creativity and “big picture” vision, combined
with our “hands on” construction phase
experience, allows us to balance project
budgets and schedule demands with the
ever increasing environmental and political
constraints.
Scope of Services
Page | 3
SURFACE WATER TREATMENT
Water Works Engineers has engineered water systems for surface water systems in Northern California and
Arizona. Specifically, Water Works Engineers has tackled the following challenges associated with surface water
treatment:
 Department of Public Health permitting assistance

 Treatment of eutrophic sources with prolific algal blooms and associated challenges
 Treatment of high turbidity sources impacted by colloidal clays
 Chemical pretreatment selection and optimization
 Filtration performance assessment and optimization
 Disinfection byproduct formation minimization
 Taste and Odor Control
 UV Disinfection
 Recycling of residuals dewatering water
Water Works Engineers can pull from experiences on these projects to develop the most effective treatment
process for your systems.
GROUNDWATER TREATMENT
Water Works Engineers highly skilled and qualified professionals have been involved in over 100 groundwater
contaminant reduction projects. Since the beginning of the firm, groundwater treatment has been one of our
core competencies. Water Works Engineers staff have
conceptualized, designed, and overseen construction, start-
up and operational optimization for dozens of cost effective
groundwater treatment facilities across the West. We
understand the complexities of groundwater treatment for
both organic and inorganic contaminants as well as the
implications of various treatment approaches on waste
disposal, general water quality, corrosion control and
disinfection byproduct formation in
distribution systems.
MECHANICAL SYSTEM DESIGN

Water Works Engineers provides detailed analysis and design for a wide range of mechanical systems. We utilize
hydraulic analysis tools that we have developed to create mechanical systems that work, and work well. From
pump stations that can accommodate a range of changing hydraulic conditions utilizing a wide range of pump
technologies to mixing systems that provide complete mixing of tanks to chemical feed systems that are reliable
and safe to air distribution systems that function over a wide range of temperatures and air flows, Water Works
Engineers designs mechanical systems that work well, are durable, and easy to operate and maintain.
Scope of Services
Page | 4
CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
Water Works Engineers has extensive experience in construction inspection, contract
administration, office services during construction (review of Contractor submittals,
Requests for Information, Requests for Change, etc.), final inspection and punch-list, and
as-built drawing production. We offer these services either in a traditional
Design, Bid, Build environment, or in conjunction with alternative delivery
methods. Our experience in working with contractors, operations and
maintenance staff, and owners helps keep projects on-schedule, on-budget
and high quality.
PREPARARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

The preparation of high-quality contract documents for municipal water and wastewater projects not only
requires a thorough understanding of the construction and operational implications of various design choices,
but also requires the patience to work through the many small details that lead to a high-quality project. Water
Works Engineers offers experienced engineers who ask the hard questions and sweat the details to make sure
that the EVMWD is provided with a high-quality project. Water Works Engineers takes great pride in our
knowledge of technical design details that can make the difference in providing a great facility.
3-DIMENSIONAL CADD MODELING

Water Works Engineers performs detailed design using 3-dimensional
CADD tools. This is our standard practice and leads to better coordination,
integrated cross-checking and clearer contract documents. The 3-
dimensional CADD Model also functions as an invaluable communications
tool, allowing better and more thorough visualization of the finished
product at every stage of design, bidding and construction.
Production of 3-dimensional PDF files allow project team
members anywhere in the world to view the CADD model
and review a 3-dimensional image of the facility during any
stage of the design process. he 3-dimensional CADD models
provide a more clear understanding of facility geometry,
access and clearance issues, and overall system
functionality, help bidding contractors quickly understand
the project, expedite the bidding process, and help on-site
construction and inspection personnel quickly familiarize
themselves with the facility.
FACILITY START UP AND OPERATIONAL SUPPORT

The goal of any project is the creation of a fully functional, properly-operating facility. Taking the leap from
construction to long-term operation of a facility requires an understanding of the treatment process, mechanical
systems, instrumentation and controls, and how operations staff do their job. Water Works Engineers has
experience in the start-up and operational support for water and wastewater facilities of all kinds. We provide
start-up planning, operator training, process start-up support, loop-tuning support, regulatory compliance
testing and reporting, and troubleshooting of existing processes. We get our hands dirty and work by your side
to get new systems operating properly, or make existing systems work better.
Scope of Services
Page | 5
FACILITY OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUALS
Water Works Engineers staff have prepared numerous O&M Manuals and Operation Guides. Our principals have
been preparing electronic O&M manuals since the technology was first developed in the mid 1990's. Fluid
Knowledge, a predecessor company of Water Works Engineers, pioneered several of the concepts still in use
today in preparation of electronic O&M Manuals. Beyond the technology, we see good O&M manuals not as a
project add-on or afterthought, but as an important means of providing critical information to those who need it
the most -- the facility operators.
COLLECTION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE ASSISTANCE

Water Works Engineers offers proven experience in asset management; operation and maintenance program
development; water quality assessment, and regulatory compliance. Some of our expertise in this area
includes:
 Sewer System Management Plans (SSMP)  Predictive Asset Failure Modeling

 Lift Station and Manhole Inspections  Sewer Hydraulics and Modeling
 Closed Circuit Television Inspection (CCTV)  Flow Monitoring
 Standardized Defect Coding (PACP, MACP, LACP)  Infiltration and Inflow Assessment
 Construction Methodology Analysis  Smoke and Dye Testing
 Life-Cycle Cost Analysis / Business Case Review  C-Factor Testing
 Environmental Permitting/Compliance  Hydrostatic / Ultrasonic Leak Detection
 Standardized Specifications  Hydrant Flow Testing
 Water and Sewer Ordinances  Water Quality / Flushing Programs
 System Mapping/GIS Data Integration  Overflow & Emergency Response Plans
 Computerized Maintenance Management  Standardized O&M Procedures (SOPs)
Systems (CMMS)  Fats, Oils & Grease Control Programs
 Field Data Information Management  Odor / Corrosion Control Programs
 Asset Prioritization Protocols  Public Outreach / Notification Programs
ENERGY EFFICIENCY AUDITS

 Water and wastewater treatment and conveyance are the most energy-intensive services provided by
municipalities. However, it also represents the largest controllable cost of providing water or wastewater
services to the public. Identifying and remedying excessive energy use can save municipalities significant
operational costs, and simultaneously qualify you for greenhouse gas or carbon emissions reduction credits, tax
incentives and utility rebates. Eureka WWTP
Water Works Engineers has the expertise to assist municipalities with water and wastewater energy usage
reduction as well as provide design of recommended upgrades. Water Works currently serves as the
water/wastewater energy efficiency sub-consultant to the California Energy Commission. In this role we have
conducted multiple water and wastewater energy efficiency studies, and have shared our knowledge in multiple
conference presentations. Water Works Engineers has provided energy efficiency improvement analyses,
optimization, and energy recovery design for multiple agencies throughout the west.
PIPE REHABILITATION/REPLACEMENT AND TRENCHLESS CONSTRUCTION

Our Northern California staff specializes in water and wastewater infrastructure condition and capacity
assessment; rehabilitation and replacement recommendations; capital improvement project planning and
Scope of Services
Page | 6
prioritization; and the rate studies and financial planning to support these programs. Our assessment projects
includes CCTV, manhole and lift station inspections; energy audits; flow monitoring; smoke and dye testing; C-
factor testing; hydrostatic and ultrasonic leak detection; fire hydrant flow testing; and water quality sampling
and flushing. Our team has significant experience performing these studies, interpreting the results, and
designing rehabilitation/replacement plans to address identified system deficiencies before they become
emergency projects.
A crucial part of Water Works Engineers rehabilitation and replacement toolbox is our comprehensive
understanding and implementation of trenchless construction methods.
Our use of performance based specifications allows us to competitively bid traditional versus trenchless
construction methods against one another, often times resulting in cost savings to our EVMWDs. Through our
field experience, we know that the key to a successful trenchless construction project is the geotechnical
investigation. Water Works has worked with our geotechnical firms to develop an approach that ensures we
have the subsurface information to select the appropriate construction method and specify mitigation measures
to ensure success. Our trenchless project experience includes horizontal directional drilling; auger bore and
jack; micro-tunneling; pipe-bursting, -reaming, and –ramming; slip-lining; cured-in-place pipe and spray applied
coatings; as well as structural rehabilitation of wet wells, manholes, and other structures. We have valuable
past project experience to draw on for any project assigned to us.
ALTERNATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY

Water Works Engineers has extensive experience in alternative project delivery, which is now 20% of our
business. While these delivery systems (design-build, CM at risk, job order contracting, etc.) are becoming far
more common in the delivery of water and wastewater conveyance and treatment projects, the breadth of our
experience successfully delivering these projects sets us apart. We have successfully executed projects ranging
from $0.5M to $56M in project value using alternative project delivery methods.
Water Works Engineers partners with contractors throughout

the West on alternative project delivery projects. Teaming with
a contractor best suited for the size, type and location of each
project makes us most responsive to project needs and
competitive on pricing and delivery times. Often, particular
contractors have extensive knowledge about project site
conditions, permitting agencies and processes, subcontractors,
etc. that make being flexible in construction partnerships a key
to providing the best end product for the facility owner.
Because we are solely focused on being an engineering and
design firm, we can provide engineering services to a variety of Nogales WWTP Design-Build Institute of
America Award 2010
contractors cooperatively, allowing selection of a contractor
who best suits the owner’s needs for each project. Water Works Engineers engineering and design staff have
learned, through experience, that the role of the Engineer when providing job order contracting or design/build
delivery is different, and certainly progresses at a different pace, than on a traditional design/bid/build project.
When working collaboratively with a contractor, whether with separate contracts with the owner (as in Job
Order Contracting) or as a subcontractor (as in Design-Build), the focus of the engineering work becomes
project facilitation. Our standard approach of three dimensional CADD modeling in facility design works very
Scope of Services
Page | 7
well to facilitate alternative delivery projects, allowing our contractor partners to develop more accurate cost
models and provide meaningful input very early in the design process.
Our role as an advocate for robust design and long term performance considerations does not change using
alternative project delivery. Working closely with both the contractor and owner allows us to further scrutinize
our design approach for each project and refine design details to provide the most cost-effective
implementation of high quality design and engineering concepts. Continuous contractor feedback, combined
with ongoing coordination with owner needs, not only leads to effective alternative delivery projects, but also
improves our work on traditional design/bid/build projects.
BIOSOLIDS AND POWER GENERATION

In a modern world where water and wastewater utilities have had to pivot from simple service providers to
resource managers, the importance of biosolids and the energy that can be derived from renewable sources has
become a considerable component of revenues and public perception.
Water Works Engineers has the multidisciplinary knowledge necessary to consider and implement valuable
solutions to the various problems associated with this area of work. Our experience includes the following
projects and facilities:
 Biosolids thickening facilities planning, selection, and detailed design.

 Fats. Oils. And Grease (FOG) receiving stations, including the analysis of associated effects such as
greater Nitrogen loads to the main treatment stream, rate structure of the various waste types,
increased biogas and energy generation, etc.
 Biogas cogeneration design and optimization
 Biogas desulphurization processes
 Hydropower generation by replacing pressure relief systems with turbines
LOCATIONS
Water Works Engineers has offices strategically located throughout the Western United States. From
these locations, we deploy our resources wherever needed to assist our
EVMWDs with their water and wastewater engineering challenges.
Scope of Services
Page | 8
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
Project Goals
The Project Team’s objective for the Project is to accomplish the following goals:
 Apply our expertise and experience to work with the EVMWD to develop the most feasible and
economic solution to convey and treat groundwater from Well 2A and 3A in the most effective,
reliable, and easy to operate manner possible
 Successfully evaluate alternative alignments to mitigate utility conflict, environmental, permitting

and property acquisition constraints
 Identify, coordinate with and submit encroachment permit applications for City, County, Flood
Control District and other identified local agencies
 Select and design a chloramination treatment solution that will comply with all Federal, State and
Local Standards and building permit requirements
 Maintain project budget control, both in design and construction costs
 Develop switch over (tie-in) strategy/plan to support logical and efficient construction phasing and
maintenance of potable water service to customers
 Design quality public bid construction documents on schedule and within budget
 Culminate all efforts in the final design of a smooth-operating, safe, and easy to maintain
groundwater conveyance and treatment system that will provide decades of service
We have the experience, expertise and dedication to accomplish these goals.
Project Background
The Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) owns and operates agricultural supply wells, Well 2A
(500-gpm at 150 psi) and Well 3A (900-gpm at 150 psi) located in unincorporated Riverside County and the City
of Corona. EVMWD desires to convert these wells to provide water to its approximately 35,000 water customers
for potable use. By doing this, EVMWD will be able to reduce their purchase water volumes from the
Metropolitan Water District, thus diversifying their water supply and reducing their expenditures.
In order to complete the conversion, the existing agriculture 6-inch and 8-inch ductile iron pipelines will be
abandoned and a new, approximately 2,500-ft 18-inch main will be installed to convey water from each well to
the 42-inch Temescal Valley Pipeline (TMV) located below Temescal Canyon Road, as shown in the EVMWD’s
“Flagler Wells Piping Alternatives” shown in Figure 1. A total of three route alternatives have been identified by
EVMWD with a preference to pursue Alternative 1, as it appears to pose the fewest environmental regulatory
and permitting challenges and offers the shortest run (preliminary EVMWD findings).
Scope of Services
Page | 9
Figure 1. Flagler Wells Piping Alternatives (EVMWD, 2014)
In addition to the new 18-inch main, EVMWD has requested the replacement of the existing pumps and motors
at each well with pumps capable of pumping into the TMV, which operates at an average pressure of 340 psi at
the proposed tie in point.
Chloramination facilities (12.5% sodium hypochlorite and 19% aqueous ammonia) will be added to the Well
2A/3A system as required by the California Department of Drinking Water. The chlorine feed system(s) will be
located near the wells with the ammonia feed system located downstream near the tie-in point. This
configuration allows for the disinfection of the raw water from each well with free chlorine prior to
chloramination through the addition of ammonia to provide the finished potable with a chloramine residual.
Water Works has identified four key issues that must be carefully considered, evaluated and addressed for
project success. Each of these issues are identified and discussed in detail in the following Project Approach
Section.
Scope of Services
Page | 10
Project Approach
Our team already completed considerable research on this project, including multiple site visits; discussions
with Agency staff; design calculations; and equipment layout and costing. Our entire team has brainstormed
options and conducted preliminary analysis. Through this effort, we have identified and developed solutions for
many of the key issues, concerns, and constraints that will drive selection of the most cost effective
improvements. We have developed our approach to identify, address and mitigate every project constraint
within the District’s budget and schedule.
This preliminary effort provides Water Works the focus necessary to follow our Project Mission: Focus on the
District’s objectives and the project’s core functionality and provide effective, efficient design.
ISSUE #1 – PIPELINE ALIGNMENT CONSTRAINTS, SELECTION AND DESIGN

Identification, analysis and selection of the best pipeline alignment is key to successful design, permitting, and
construction of the project. The pipeline alignment can generally be broken into two segments. Segment 1
extends between wells 2A and 3A (well piping) and will be sized for flow from only the one well it serves
depending on which Segment 2 alignment is selected. Segment 2 extends from well 2A or 3A north or south
along the Temescal Wash (and conservation land) where at some point it must turn and head west until it
reaches the existing welded steel Temescal Valley Pipeline (TVP) located in Temescal Canyon Road. Water
Works will build on the alignment alternatives work already completed by the District depicted as Alternatives 1,
2, and 3 in the Flagger Well Piping Alternative Figure. There are a number of constraints that affect selection of
the exact alignment, including constructability (construction methods, shoring, dewatering, traffic impacts;
ground contamination, etc.); environmental impacts, mitigation, & permitting; right-of-way and private property
easement procurement; existing utility coordination; hydraulics; operation & maintenance and access. All of
these must be taken into account not only when developing and selecting the exact location of the pipe, but also
where and what improvements must be made to the well sites and the chemical feed facilities.
Environmental Constraints and Approach

The following is a preliminary list of key environmental issues based on our initial review of existing information
of the project area:
 Potential water quality effects to unnamed drainage at NW corner of JW
Mitchell property primarily associated with erosion / sedimentation during
excavation (potential trenchless crossing option to avoid?);
 Constructed-related impacts to special-status species or sensitive habitat
that may be in adjacent Temescal Wash and conservation land;
 Construction-related effects on existing, adjacent land uses, primarily urban
industrial uses, associated with noise, fugitive dust and access. The
preferred route will likely require permanent easement procurement; and
Unnamed drainage at NW corner of JW
 Construction-related effects to existing traffic along adjacent roadways, Mitchell property, adjacent to Temescal
including Temescal Canyon Road and possibly Cajalco Road. Wash and conservation land
Water Works team and the District will stay in close contact to ensure a shared
understanding of key engineering design and environmental issues and how both of these factors relate to
selection of the best pipeline alignment and support the environmental approval process. We pride ourselves in
our ability to develop innovative solutions to ensure that environmental approval for a project can be completed
Scope of Services
Page | 11
in a timely manner, which is of particular concern given the aggressive schedule the District is intending to
achieve for this project. A key component to developing innovative solutions is a thorough environmental
constraints analysis during the early design phase of the project, which allows for the:
 Identification of potential project “show stoppers” early (i.e., cultural resources sites, sensitive biological
areas) and development of strategies to address these issues;
 Increased certainty in terms of the environmental approval schedule because critical issues will be identified
and handled during the preliminary design phase and not as a costly change order during construction; and
 Avoidance of costly delays by addressing key environmental concerns during project design by working
closely with the engineering team during the preliminary design phase to discuss sensitive areas to be
avoided before extensive time is expended designing an alternative that will not be carried forward.
Two examples of how our environmental constraints analysis approach will benefit the District are:
1. Alternative 3 is the shortest, however it will have extremely high impacts on existing environmental
features compared to Alternatives 1 &2 and thus can be eliminated without costly additional analysis.
2. Both Alignments 1&2 cross the unnamed drainage at the NW corner of the JW Mitchell Property. This
drainage has the potential to add significant environmental permitting constraints that can be costly
both with respect to time and budget. One alternative could be to cross that area utilizing a trenchless
construction method. During the environmental constraints analysis, Water Works will compare the
cost of permitting an open cut crossing with the feasibility and cost of a trenchless crossing. Given the
geotechnical conditions observed from the surface during our site visit, pipe ramming is the likely
preferred trenchless option that would be compared to open-cut.
Pipeline Design Constraints

The following is a preliminary list of key pipeline design issues based on initial review of available information:
 The operating pressure for the well and TVP connection point average from 330 PSI to 350 PSI with
operational data monitored by District ranging from 320 PSI to 371 PSI. These conditions obviously
necessitate the selection of high pressure pipe, likely welded steel-mortar lined and coated pipe (WSP).
 Per District standards the maximum velocity for transmission lines is 3 fps, which could allow for the use of
16-inch or 14-inch diameter WSP depending on whether the maximum design flow is 550 GPM from Well 2A
and 900 GPM from Well 3A, totaling 1450 GPM or a de-rated maximum at Well 3A, totaling only 1250 GPM.
However, in addition to velocity design constraints, this pipeline must be sized to account for the contact
time required to properly operate the chloramination and ammonia chemical feed system being
contemplated. This additional requirement may result in the need to oversize the pipe to an 18-inch
diameter, which results in velocities less than 1 fps at low flow and only 2 fps at maximum flows. These low
velocities could result in settling of solids (like sand) in the pipeline. To address this potential constraint (if it
is confirmed as a concern during preliminary engineering), Water Works will analyze the addition of sand
filters at each well or utilization of a longer smaller diameter pipeline to maintain velocity and CT. A more
detailed discussion of Chemical Feed System Design and Siting constraints is provided in a subsequent
section of the proposal.
 The tie-in connection at TVP will require significant coordination. Water Works will develop strategies for
phasing construction to limit and/or address constraints on operations and public impact during
construction, including traffic control, pressure reduction needs (if any) at TVP, etc.
 After construction and start-up, O&M staff will require access to not only the well sites but the pipeline as
well. Selection and layout of the preferred pipe alignment must take into account this need. For the
pipeline this will come in the form of permanent utility easement around existing development, while an
access only easement may be able to be secured through the existing Temescal Canyon Storage Center.
Scope of Services
Page | 12
Alignment Alternatives Analysis and Preferred Alignment Selection Workshop
Water Works will use the information gathered under initial tasks to develop a detailed cost estimate which will
be used to compare alignment alternatives and identify the recommended route. We shall produce an
Alignment Alternatives Analysis that is built on the premise that detailed research, field investigation, and
analysis during preliminary design will result in selection of a constructible, economically feasible project.
Selection of the preferred alternative / route is based on identifying and mitigating potential “hard” construction
related criteria (constructability issues that affect materials, equipment, and labor costs) and “soft” non-
construction constraints (environmental, right-of-way, easement procurement, outside agency coordination,
permitting, etc.). Through thorough examination of these issues, the preferred alternative / route balances
“hard” cost considerations with avoidance of “soft” complications. Completion of a thoroughly vetted Alignment
Alternatives Cost Estimate will provide the guidance for selection of the preferred alternative.
Water Works will facilitate a workshop discussion involving District staff to review the analysis process, discuss
results, summarize recommended alternative and confirm project next steps. Water Works will prepare a
workshop presentation materials including:
 Alignment Alternatives Figures (Plan view and Profile where deemed appropriate)
 Construction Constraints, summary (geotechnical, environmental, existing utilities, right-of-way, easement,
encroachment, concerns of key stakeholders, permitting, land-use);
 Capacity Assessment Results / Facility Sizing / Design Criteria
 Potential project phasing and tie-in strategies
 Alignment Alternative Analysis Cost Estimation (Soft and Hard Costs)
 Recommended preferred alignment alternative
 Schedule confirmation (confirm critical path items for planning and design, Environmental processing,
permit processing, right-of-way/easement procurement construction phasing,)
Water Works will field and address District questions and comments. Water Works and District will leave the
workshop with mutually agreed upon preferred alignment and which design support services are required to be
completed as part of the project. We will immediately finalize production of Preliminary Design Report (PDR),
which shall present a succinct, clear, and concise set of design criteria. ENGINEER will incorporate questions and
comments from Preferred Alignment Selection Workshop into report. The PDR is intended to serve as the
foundation for detailed design as follows:
 Identify engineering issues and constraints and recommended resolutions;
 Provide detailed guidance for effective and efficient execution of final design;
 Describe clear procedures for maintaining existing service and access during construction;
 Illustrate tie-in requirements and expectations so District can confirm; and
 Provide a detailed project description for use with permit applications and easement procurement.
Scope of Services
Page | 13
ISSUE #2 – AGENCY COORDINATION, PERMITTING AND RIGHT OF WAY
CEQA Processing and Environmental Permitting
The results of the preliminary environmental constraints report and PDR can be used as the initial framework for
completing the CEQA document, technical studies (i.e., biological resources assessment, cultural resources
survey report), and regulatory permit applications. The level of environmental assistance required during Final
Design Phase will match the needs of the preferred alternative. As a public agency, the District is required to
comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) when it proposes to carry out or approve a project.
The District is expected to be the CEQA lead agency for the project because it has the primary responsibility to
approve the Flagler Wells Pipeline Connection project. Other agencies, such as the City of Corona or Riverside
County Water Conservation and Flood Control District will be responsible for issuing encroachment permits for
the project. It is likely that these other agencies would be identified as responsible agencies in the CEQA
document and would be able to use the District CEQA document for their approvals. It is anticipated that an
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration will be required and developed in the following order:
 Prepare and Administrative Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
 Prepare and Circulate Public Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
 Prepare Final Mitigated Negative Declaration/Coordinate Project Approval
Subsequent to the CEQA approval process and in parallel with it where possible to expedite schedule, Water
Works will complete environmental permit applications for preferred alignment. If a portion of the selected
pipeline alignment affects sensitive resources (e.g., wetlands), as identified in the jurisdictional delineation,
Water Works team will complete the following permitting application assistance to obtain approval for
construction in affected areas as follows:
 Prepare and submit to a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) to ACOE.
 Prepare written request for Authorization under the 404 Nationwide Permit program, 1602 Streambed
Alteration Agreement and 401 Water Quality Certification.
 Coordinate with ACOE, RWQCB, CDFW staff as needed, including meeting with regulatory staff in field.
Public Agency Coordination

It is likely that several of the identified “other agencies” will have significant questions about the proposed
project and stakeholder meetings with those agencies will be beneficial to timely processing of the required
project approvals. Water Works will facilitate a meeting with each of the likely stakeholders (i.e. the City of
Corona, Riverside County Water Conservation and Flood Control District, etc.) using the results of the initial
preliminary design analysis. The intent of this is to identify stakeholder likely design requirements, permitting
and approval process (including CEQA drivers and requirements); and discuss key areas of concern for each.
Identified requirements will be incorporated into the design and Contract Documents as deemed appropriate.
Private Easement Procurement

All of the likely pipeline alignment alternative cross multiple jurisdictions and privately owned parcels. As a
result, the proposed pipeline will at minimum require encroachment permits for construction work and
easement documents for the pipeline. Water Works will assist with acquisition of permanent underground
utility easement and/or temporary construction easement. Easement and/or right of way services can vary in
Scope of Services
Page | 14
effort to complete the acquisition process and can include easement description, title reports, nominal fee
valuations, negotiations and title and escrow coordination services all of which we are prepared to provide.
ISSUE #3 – CHEMICAL FEED FACILITY DESIGN AND SITING

There are several considerations regarding chemical feed facilities for this project:
1. Injection of Chemicals Into a High Pressure Water Main
Direct injection of chlorine or ammonia into a water main with 340 psi of pressure is not advisable from a safety,
reliability, or cost standpoint. Chemical feed equipment, pumps and piping is generally not suited for high
pressure application. Leaks at high pressure can cause more risk of operator injury and having direct chemical
injection will increase the risk of a leak in the water main. In order to safely and effectively inject chemicals into
this system, a booster pump chemical feed loop will have to be used. A schematic of the booster pump chemical
feed loop is shown below:
The booster pump chemical feed loop provides for the injection of chemicals at low pressure, the connection to
the high pressure water main using standard tee connections and valves rated for the pipeline pressure, and
also provide mixing energy for the chemical being injected into the high pressure water main. If multiple
chemicals are being injected in one location, both chemicals can be injected into the low pressure section of the
loop if the process/treatment objectives allow it.
2. Process Design/Treatment Objectives
Scope of Services
Page | 15
The purpose of the addition of chlorine and ammonia may be singular or two-fold. The RFP states that the
District intends to install chlorine feed system at the well head and an ammonia feed system near the
connection to the distribution system. This may accomplish two objectives:
a. The primary objective is likely to provide chloramination for disinfection residual in the distribution
system. This objective could be accomplished with chlorine and ammonia feed in the same location
using the same booster pump chemical feed loop.
b. A secondary objective may be to provide for the potential of needing to provide free chlorine
contact time adequate for 4-log virus inactivation for the well water prior to chloramination. This
would be required under the groundwater rule to avoid triggered monitoring requirements. CT for
virus inactivation is, of course, significantly shorter using free chlorine than using chloramine.
These process design/treatment objectives need to be examined carefully for this case. The most
comprehensive approach from a process design standpoint is to chlorinate at the well head and add ammonia at
the injection point to the distribution system, as stated in the RFP. However, maintenance and delivery access to
the sodium hypochlorite storage and feed systems for the well heads may be a significant challenge.
Additionally, having three chemical feed locations will be a more significant operation and maintenance effort
given that the chemical feed stations need to use the booster pump chemical feed loop in order to inject
chemicals into the high pressure water main.
It may be beneficial to consider an alternative of having a single chloramination station located at a site which is
convenient for chemical truck delivery, operation and maintenance access, and having provisions at each
wellhead to install temporary sodium hypochlorite feed systems in the event that a total-coliform positive (TC
Positive) sample is taken from the system and the triggered monitoring samples subsequently taken also have
fecal- indicator positives. The wellhead sodium hypochlorite feed systems would be planned corrective action in
the event that a TC Positive sample is found. This approach will be discussed with EVMWD and the potential for
cost savings, simplification of operation and maintenance, and reduced issues regarding chemical deliveries will
be balanced against the approach to regulatory compliance for disinfection.
3. Chemical Storage and Feed Facility Siting, Operation, Maintenance and Delivery Access
As discussed above, siting of the chemical storage and feed systems required for this project is a critical aspect
of long-term operational satisfaction with the work. Discussions with EVMWD regarding operator access,
maintenance access, and specifically chemical truck loading and unloading will be critical to deciding the overall
plan for chemical feed for chlorine and ammonia. Unfortunately, the sodium hypochlorite storage requirements
are, in general, larger than the ammonia storage requirements for chloramination systems, making delivery
truck access to the sodium hypochlorite storage tanks more critical. This makes siting of the facilities, along with
the process considerations discussed above, even more critical. Water Works Engineers will work with EVMWD
water quality, operations and maintenance staff as well as the chemical suppliers who will be serving the site to
make certain that the final configuration of the chlorine and ammonia storage and feed systems is an optimum
balance of all of the project needs for disinfection and disinfection residual.
Scope of Services
Page | 16
SCOPE OF WORK
The following services will be provided by Water Works Engineers for the detailed design of the Elsinore Valley
Municipal Water District Flagler Wells Conversion Pipeline Project (Project). This Scope of Work has been split
into Tasks and Subtasks as follows:
Task/Subtask Title
Preliminary Design
1 Project Review
2 Kick-Off Meeting and Discussion of Project Review Findings
3 Preliminary Design
3.1 Utility Research and Agency Contact
3.1.1 Utility and Agency Research
3.1.2 Notification and Determination of Scheduled Projects
3.2 Potholing
3.3 Environmental Documentation
3.3.1 Phase 1 – Environmental Constraints Analysis/Field Studies
3.3.2 Phase 2 – CEQA Compliance Documentation & Permitting
3.4 Preliminary Design Route Selection
3.4.1 Review Available Information and Conduct Site Reconnaissance
3.4.2 Construction Methodology Assessment (Open Cut versus Trenchless Options)
3.4.3 Disinfection Facilities
3.4.4 Wellhead Facilities
3.4.5 Flush-to-Waste Piping
3.4.6 Pipeline Sizing and Materials of Construction Review
3.4.7 Construction Phasing/Tie-in Strategy Analysis/Site Access and Traffic Control
3.4.8 Route Analysis Cost Estimating
3.4.9 Route Analysis/Preferred Alignment Selection Workshop
3.5 Preliminary Design Report (PDR)
4 Base Sheet Preparation
4.1 Aerial mapping
4.2 Field Survey
4.3 Boundary Survey with Legal Descriptions
Scope of Services
Page | 17
5 Geotechnical
5.1 Soil Borings
5.2 Geotechnical Report
Final Design
6 75% Design Submittal
9 Bidding Services
10 Construction Services
11 Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) and Project Administration
12 Meetings and Communication
12.1 Design Meetings
12.2 Communication
12.3 Special Meetings
13 Project Design Schedule
14 Right Of Way
14.1 Pipeline (Optional)
14.2 Ammonia Feed Siting (Optional)
14.3 Encroachment Permitting
Task 1 – Project Review

After the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) is signed, ENGINEER will perform its own review of the
proposed project to verify that that Project can be designed and built as proposed in the RFP. ENGINEER will
contact, at a minimum, the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, the City of Corona
and the County of Riverside to obtain the following information:
1) Permitting requirements
2) Design guidelines and details
3) Construction requirements
4) Restrictions
There are no deviations from the scope of work provided in Section III. Minimum Scope of Work, Task 1 of the
RFP.
Meetings • Project Review Meeting with Riverside County Flood Control District
Deliverables • Project Review Meeting – Meeting Minutes
• Teleconference Notes (City of Corona and County of Riverside)
Scope of Services
Page | 18
Task 2 – Kick-off Meeting and Discussion of Project Review Findings
After meeting with the various agencies, as identified in Task 1, Water Works Engineers will hold a Kick-Off
Meeting with EVMWD to discuss the following, at a minimum:
1) Introductions
2) Proposed Project Review
a) Project Team Findings
b) Agency Review Results
3) Reaffirm proposed scope of work
a) Agree on Project Objectives
b) Agree on Project Components
4) Review of Water Works Engineers plans for implementing the work
5) Reaffirm proposed project schedule
6) Communication Protocol Review
7) Gather existing data from EVMWD
a) Existing Record Drawings
b) Operational Data
c) Water Quality Data
Prior to the Kick-Off Meeting, Water Works Engineers will provide a proposed meeting agenda to EVMWD and a
list of the requested existing project data to be provided to Water Works Engineers.
There are no deviations from the scope of work provided in Section III. Minimum Scope of Work, Task 2 of the
RFP.
Meetings • Project Kick-Off Meeting

Deliverables • Project Kick-Off Meeting – Agenda
• Project Kick-Off Meeting - Meeting Minutes
Task 3 – Preliminary Design

Paying special attention to the Preliminary Design is perhaps one of the most effective Project Management
tools available, having enormous impact on both project quality and project budgetary performance (both in
design cost and overall project cost). At Water Works Engineers, we place tremendous importance on the
Preliminary Design as it establishes a detailed definition of the project and refines the established schedule and
budget.
The Preliminary Design is the roadmap for all subsequent design decisions on a project. It will be used by all of
the project design team members (electrical, structural, civil, CADD technicians, etc.) in the development of the
detailed design. We often refer to “aiming the cannon” when we talk about Preliminary Design development.
This is the most critical time to dig deep into each design issue and come to a decision on how all of the details
of the facility will be designed. Changes at the Preliminary Design level are far easier to manage than changes
Scope of Services
Page | 19
late in the design process, both from a cost and quality standpoint. The Preliminary Design is generally
developed by a small team of engineers (the Project Manager and Project Engineer)
The Preliminary Design gives us the opportunity to efficiently and effectively review each design detail with our
EVMWD at the 30% Design Review Meeting/Workshop. The 30% Design Review Meeting/Workshop is a point in
the project which is early enough that changes can be accommodated without impacting project design budget.
This opportunity for our EVMWD to have a real impact on project direction and feel free to do so without
getting significant resistance plays an enormous role in project success.
Preliminary engineering activities will be separated into subtasks as follows:
SUBTASK 3.1 – UTILITY RESEARCH AND AGENCY CONTACT

Water Works Engineers recognizes that early documented coordination with the utility providers and the
various municipal and regulatory agencies is crucial to project success. The following subtasks will be executed
as early as possible in the Project schedule to establish good, trusted working relationships with the contacts,
gain utility provider and agency input early and minimize potential project delays.
3.1.1 - Utility and Agency Research

Water Works Engineers will contact Underground Service Alert (USA/SC) to request a substructure listing for the
area of the proposed improvements. In addition to potential utilities located near and through these areas, local
agencies will be determined that have jurisdiction in the project areas. The anticipated utilities and agencies are
as follows, at a minimum:
• Utilities
o Southern California Edison Company (Distribution and Transmission)
o Southern California Gas Company (Distribution and Transmission)
o Verizon and Other Telecommunications Companies
o Cable Television Companies
o Elsinore Valley Mutual Water District
• Agencies
o City of Corona
o County of Riverside
o Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
3.1.2 – Notification and Determination of Scheduled Projects

Following the identification of the utility providers that have utilities in the proposed project areas and agencies
with jurisdiction in the area, Water Works Engineers will inform (in writing) them of the District’s Project and
request information on any proposed projects that are planned in the proposed project area. For any planned
projects identified by the utility providers or jurisdictional agencies within 3-months of the proposed schedule
for the Flagler Wells Conversion Pipeline Project, Water Works Engineers will obtain the project schedule and
incorporate it into Preliminary Design Report and Project Schedule. Every effort will be made to coordinate
project activities and minimize conflicts between projects.
Scope of Services
Page | 20
3.1.3 - Utility Identification
Once all utility providers and jurisdictional agencies have been identified and notified of the Project, Water
Works Engineers will perform a thorough detailed search of all above and below ground utilities in the proposed
project areas. This search extends to both areas in the public right of way and those on private property. The
utility identification search will include (1) the search and examination of all pertinent “Record Drawings”, (2)
on-site inspections and (3) Underground Service Alert (USA/SC) requests for the proposed Project areas.
3.1.4 - Utility and Agency Coordination Documentation

Water Works Engineers will document all utility and agency correspondence conducted for the Project. All
utilities identified will be plotted on scaled plan and profile drawings that will later be incorporated into the
plans. Documentation of correspondence shall include the following:
1) Correspondence Records(Letters/Emails)
a) Unique Correspondence Number
b) Date
c) Contact (by name, title and department)
d) Subject
e) Carbon Copy to EVMWD
f) Body of Request/Response/Action Taken
2) On-site Inspections/Investigation Records
a) Unique Correspondence Number
b) Date
c) Attendees
d) Subject
e) Carbon Copy to EVMWD
f) Purpose
g) Findings
h) Further Action
3) Utility and Agency Research Log
a) Itemized Submittal/Cover Letter (signed by Project Manager)
b) List of Utilities and Jurisdictional Agencies contacted and status of each
c) Correspondence Records
d) On-site Inspections/Investigation Records
e) Utility Plot
Meetings • Utility and Agency Meetings (Total of 3 meetings)

Deliverables • Utility and Agency Research Log
P r o 12
SUBTASK 3.2 – POTHOLING

Water Works Engineers will compare proposed alignments with utility coordination maps, records research and
field reconnaissance data, to identify potential points of conflict between proposed pipe alignments and other
Scope of Services
Page | 21
utilities. Water Works Engineers will prepare a list of requested pothole locations (“soft excavation” of total of
25 locations) and present that list to EVMWD for review.
Water Works Engineers, with the assistance of potholing subcontractor, VCI Construction, will perform the
following at a minimum:
• Documentation of key utility locations and missing data information
• Notification of USA’s “Dig Alert”
• Field Survey
• Obtaining required permits for traffic control and setting up traffic control
• Excavating, backfilling and repairing pavement
• Incorporation of the “pothole” information into the contract documents.
Meetings • None
Deliverables • Pothole Plan
• Survey Records
SUBTASK 3.3 – ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION

Dudek will provide environmental services for the project. Environmental services for the project could vary
significantly dependent on actual results of field and office data collection and analysis. For this reason,
Environmental Services have been broken into tasks and subtasks to identify constraints and mitigate the
potential affect. Phase 1 will include a preliminary Environmental Constrains Analysis necessary to assist Water
Works Engineers with identification of preferred alignment, as well as initial field studies to be conducted by
Dudek related to biological resources and cultural resources. Phase 2 will include CEQA compliance
documentation to support design and construction of preferred alignment. Phase 1 is described under this
subtask and Phase 2 under separate subtask.
The following understanding of the project environmental setting defines the assumptions used to develop the
environmental scope of services.
Project Understanding - Possible alternative alignments along segments of the pipeline are expected to be
identified to avoid potential environmental constraints, such as wetlands and sensitive habitats.
Role of Agencies - As a public agency, the EVMWD is required to comply with the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) when it proposes to carry out or approve a project. The EVMWD is expected to be the CEQA
lead agency for the project because it has the primary responsibility to approve the Flagler Wells Pipeline
Connection project. Other agencies, such as the City of Corona or Riverside County Water Conservation and
Flood Control District will be responsible for issuing encroachment permits for the project. We assume these
other agencies would be identified as responsible agencies in the CEQA document and would be able to use the
EVMWD CEQA document for their approvals.
Requested Services - Dudek will be responsible for completing the requisite CEQA documentation for the project
and will work in concert with EVMWD and Water Works Engineers to complete this task.
Key Assumptions. Provided below is the list of assumptions made concerning services:
Scope of Services
Page | 22
 Water Works Engineers will provide Dudek with project designs for each alternative alignment in
AutoCAD or GIS format, a study limits boundary (which includes alternative alignment locations), and a
written description of the project;
 Additional studies necessary for CEQA compliance identified during Phase 1 or 2, which are not already
identified herein (if any) will be provided as additional services (none are anticipated at this time).
 Dudek will complete required permitting (if needed) and will be responsible for submitting any required
permit applications (e.g., Clean Water Act Sections 401 and 404, Fish and Game Code Section 1602) and
filing fees will be paid by District. Services related to this are detailed under Phase 2 environmental
scope.
 Preparation of Caltrans-specific technical studies and National Environmental Policy Act and CEQA-Plus
compliance documents will not be required.
3.3.1 – Phase 1 of Environmental Services - Environmental Constraints Analysis / Field

Studies
Phase 1 Environmental Constrains Analysis will include the following services.
Environmental Subconsultant, Dudek will complete the following:
 Review topographic maps of potential alignment alternatives provided by Water Works Engineers.
 Conduct biological reconnaissance survey and create baseline biological resources map with vegetation
communities.
 Water Works Engineers and EVMWD will work together to produce map of route with an agreed-upon
width consistent with potential alignment options.
In support of the overall Route Analysis / Preferred Alignment Selection, Dudek will conduct a preliminary
environmental evaluation of the proposed and possible pipeline alignments (study area). The study area is
expected to extend about 50 feet to either side of the current pipeline alignment. Three major alternative
alignments are anticipated. Dudek will coordinate with Water Works Engineers to establish a study area
boundary and provide a map depicting the boundary to the EVMWD prior to them beginning fieldwork. The
evaluation will include the following:
 Review of existing information and reports relating to the proposed project, County/City General Plan
and Zoning Code, Flood Rate Insurance Mapping, and other readily available sources;
 Review of initial biological and cultural resources information (specifically including identification of
special-status species that may be present in the study area; potential for wetlands, riparian vegetation,
and drainages in the study area; and potential for important cultural resources to be encountered in the
study area); and
 Assessment of land use key issues of concern (e.g., noise standards, air quality concerns, land use
compatibility, traffic).
The findings will be compiled and presented in a brief technical memorandum for incorporation into the Water
Works Engineers Route Analysis / Preferred Alignment Selection and into the CEQA document for the project.
The memorandum will provide a general description of the environmental setting for the study area, include a
list of potential constraints by issue area, and provide supporting maps and graphics. The memorandum will
also identify the anticipated environmental documentation required to implement the CEQA process, potential
Scope of Services
Page | 23
for regulatory permits, potential for focused biological surveys and specific constraints of the alternative
alignments for the pipeline.
Meetings • None
Deliverables • Site Survey CADD Files
3.3.2 –Phase 2 of Environmental Services - CEQA Compliance Documentation &

Permitting
Phase 2 environmental services will include CEQA compliance documentation to support design and
construction of preferred alignment. Under this task, Dudek will document CEQA compliance for the project
and coordinate with EVMWD on completing the CEQA review process. The Information collected during the
environmental constraints analysis is expected to inform the decision on the alternative that will be the subject
of the CEQA document. Based on our experience with these types of projects and the project area, we
anticipate that a Mitigated Negative Declaration will be the appropriate CEQA document. We have presented a
scope for a Mitigated Negative Declaration:
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration

The project is located adjacent to Temescal Wash, and conservation land. Dudek works extensively in the
project area and understands the sensitive resources in the area. We assume the project would not generate
major controversy such that an environmental impact report would be necessary.
In support of the CEQA analysis, and given the project location, Dudek will conduct technical analyses which will
be located in the Appendix of the IS/MND. The technical analyses to be conducted as part of our scope of work
includes: air quality/greenhouse gas modeling; biological resources assessment; cultural resources assessment;
jurisdictional delineation; and noise impact analysis.
Dudek will prepare an IS/MND using the environmental checklist form included as Appendix G of the CEQA
guidelines (or other format preferred by EVMWD) to analyze environmental impacts and identify appropriate
mitigation measures. The document will be prepared in a narrative format that describes the environmental
setting for the study area, summarizes the results of the technical studies (biological resources assessment,
cultural resources investigation, etc.), identifies potential impacts resulting from the proposed project, and
recommends mitigation measures (as appropriate). Each issue area covered in the environmental checklist
(Appendix G) will be evaluated at a suitable level of detail to fully address all potential impacts of the proposed
project. The IS/MND will only analyze the preferred project alternative at a full level of detail. Water Works
Engineers will provide a comprehensive project description and adequate details to fully analyze the effects of
the proposed project (e.g., from the PDR). Since mitigation measures are expected, Dudek will also prepare a
comprehensive Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) to ensure that measures identified in the
IS/MND are implemented. The MMRP will include:
• Mitigation requirements by environmental topic or resource area;
• Criteria for measuring success and/or completion of mitigation;
• Party(ies) responsible for implementation; and
• Party(ies) responsible for monitoring/reporting.
Scope of Services
Page | 24
Dudek will submit an administrative draft IS/MND to EVMWD for review and comment and address comments
to produce a draft IS/MND for public review. Dudek will coordinate with EVMWD to distribute the document to
the public for a 30-day review period and can prepare the appropriate notices for the distribution (i.e.,
newspaper notice, public notice, Notice of Completion, Notice of Intent). EVMWD will provide the distribution
list and EVMWD will be responsible for posting Notices with County Clerk and State Clearinghouse. EVMWD will
also post the Notice of Intent in a local paper for one day at the beginning of the review period. Dudek
attendance at a public meeting during the review period is not included in this scope of work.
After the close of the public comment period, Dudek will review the public and agency comments, compile and
number all substantive comments, and provide written responses for each comment provided. Note: the level
of effort to respond to comment assumes up to 16 hours of technical staff time. Additional budget may be
required if extensive and substantive comments are received. Dudek will provide the EVMWD with a draft set of
responses to comments for review and approval. The draft IS/MND with any necessary revisions (assumed to be
minor) will become the Final IS/MND, and the Final written responses to comments will be included as part of
the Final IS/MND. Assuming comments warranting substantial revision or recirculation of the IS/MND are not
received, Dudek will complete the Final IS/MND which will include response to comments or EVMWD approval.
Dudek will coordinate the final stages of the CEQA process with EVMWD. CEQA approval would occur via
adoption of a mitigated negative declaration by the EVMWD Board. CEQA requires that the lead agency file a
Notice of Determination (NOD) with the State Clearinghouse and County Clerk after deciding to approve a
project for which a negative declaration has been adopted. Dudek will prepare the NOD for review and
signature by EVMWD and EVMWD will file it with the State Clearinghouse and County Clerk, with the
assumption that EVMWD will pay any necessary filing fees. Dudek attendance at Board meetings during the
CEQA review process is not included in this scope of work.
Compensatory mitigation may be required for some of the project impacts identified by Dudek during this
analysis. Because the requirements for and extent of the required mitigation cannot be estimated at this stage
of analysis, preparation of detailed plans to mitigate impacts to jurisdictional waters or other biological or
cultural resources is excluded from the work plan, except as described herein. Also excluded, are any other
technical studies not included above, regulatory permit applications, preparation of mitigation and monitoring
program (separate from the MMRP), an environmental impact report, and any National Environmental Policy
Act documentation.
Environmental Permitting in Support of ISMND Portion of Alignment

If a portion of the selected pipeline alignment affects sensitive resources (e.g., wetlands), as identified in the
jurisdictional delineation, Environmental Subconsultant, DUDEK, will complete the following permitting
application assistance to obtain approval for construction in affected areas as follows:
• Prepare and submit to a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) to ACOE.

• Prepare written request for Authorization under the 404 Nationwide Permit program, 1602 Streambed
Alteration Agreement and 401 Water Quality Certification.
• Up to one site visit with regulatory staff if needed.
• Coordination with ACOE, RWQCB and CDFW staff as needed but up to 24 hours.
Scope of Services
Page | 25
SUBTASK 3.4 – PRELIMINARY DESIGN ROUTE SELECTION
The preliminary design route selection task is intended to investigate the possible pipe alignments and provide a
recommended pipe alignment for further analysis and design. The preliminary design route selection will
incorporate the utility and agency contact findings (Subtask 3.1), Phase 1 environmental constraints analysis
findings (Subtask 3.3.1), preliminary geotechnical findings (Subtask 5.1), pothole results (Subtask 3.2) and the
field and aerial survey results (Subtask 4.1). At a minimum, the following concerns will be addressed in the
Preliminary Design Route Selection:
• Impacts to traffic during construction of improvements

• Ability to access and maintain facilities
• Construction impact on adjacent utilities
• Any modifications necessary for existing utilities
• Any additional right-of-way, temporary or permanent easement required, or permits required
• Other agency concerns
• Criteria established by the Department of Health for separation from water lines and other utilities
• The excavation requirements for construction
• Interference with business interests during construction
Preliminary design route selection activities will be separated into the following subtasks:
3.4.1 – Review Available Information and Conduct Site Reconnaissance

Water Works Engineers shall complete preliminary field investigations and research necessary to necessary to
complete initial feasibility and alternatives analysis. The results of this task will be presented to the EVMWD for
discussion and consensus on approved alternatives that will be developed in more detail under the subsequent
preliminary design task(s). During initial review and reconnaissance, Water Works Engineers will catalogue
available existing planning and design documents from EVMWD and review prior to site reconnaissance. Water
Works Engineers will facilitate site reconnaissance of likely pipeline alignment alternatives. It is anticipated that
key members of Water Works Engineers team (as well as select EVMWD staff) will be present during site
reconnaissance to identify and discuss key areas of concern and constraints and likely design alternatives and
feasibility.
3.4.2 – Construction Methodology Assessment (Open Cut versus Trenchless Options)

Water Works Engineers shall conduct a construction methodology assessment to identify and confirm the
viability of traditional and trenchless construction options along the alignment. This shall include a review of cut
& cover traditional construction and trenchless auger bore and jack of the environmental constraint locations.
3.4.3 – Disinfection Facilities

Water Works Engineers will evaluate the existing water quality data provided by EVMWD and past
correspondence records with the Department of Drinking Water (DDW) to assess the disinfection requirements
for the Project (i.e., free chlorine demand of raw water, chlorine contact time, desired chloramine residual, well
operation scenarios, etc.). Once the water quality goals and disinfection requirements are established, the
preliminary sizing of the sodium hypochlorite and ammonia chemical feed systems and associated support
facilities will be completed. A preliminary layout of each of the chemical feed system facilities will be composed
to present to and gain input from EVMWD (operation and maintenance, accessibility and safety preferences)
Scope of Services
Page | 26
and provide a rough footprint for each of the systems for siting considerations of the disinfection facilities and
pipeline route selection.
3.4.4 – Wellhead Facilities

The existing wellhead facilities will be evaluated, relative to the increased service pressure and existing
condition, for potential reuse in the design of the new facilities. The wellhead facilities that will be evaluated and
selected include the following at each well site, at a minimum:
• Well Pump and Motor

• Flow Control Valve
• Valves and Piping
• Electrical System
• SCADA System
3.4.5 – Flush to Waste Piping

Water Works Engineers will investigate the requirements of a flush-to-waste system from the well head to (1)
the Temescal Wash and (2) to the adjacent RV Park’s parking lot storm drain water polishing facilities. This
investigation will include the investigation and analysis of the volume, retention time, hydraulic viability,
pipeline alignment and environmental constraints of each flush-to-waste option.
3.4.6 – Pipeline Sizing Materials of Construction Review

Water Works Engineers shall identify, discuss and make recommendation for pipeline and mechanical
equipment for project implementation. This will include a review of the pipeline sizing (for both hydraulic and
chlorine contact time requirements), pipeline materials and restraint systems that should be considered for the
elevated operating pressures (>340 psi) and potential for aggressive soils. The EVMWD standards and Accepted
Materials Guidelines will be utilized as a starting point for this analysis.
3.4.7 – Construction Phasing / Tie-In Strategy Analysis / Site access and Traffic Control
Water Works Engineers shall develop strategies for phasing construction to limit and/or address constraints on
operations and public impact during construction, as well as staying within EVMWD budget and schedule.
3.4.8 – Route Analysis Cost Estimating (Soft and Hard Costs)

Water Works Engineers will use the information gathered under initial tasks to develop a conceptual cost
estimate which will be used to compare alignment alternatives and identify the recommended route. Water
Works Engineers shall produce a route analysis that is built on the premise that detailed research, field
investigation, and analysis during preliminary design will result in selection of a constructible, economically
feasible project. Selection of the preferred alternative / route is based on identifying and mitigating potential
“hard” construction related criteria (constructability issues that affect materials, equipment, and labor costs)
and “soft” non-construction constraints (environmental, right-of-way, easement procurement, outside agency
coordination, permitting, etc.). Through thorough examination of these issues, the preferred alternative / route
balances “hard” cost considerations with avoidance of “soft” complications. Completion of a thoroughly vetted
Route Analysis Cost Estimate will provide the guidance for selection of the preferred alternative.
Scope of Services
Page | 27
3.4.9 – Route Analysis / Preferred Alignment Selection Workshop
Water Works Engineers will facilitate a workshop discussion involving EVMWD staff to review the analysis
process, discuss results, summarize recommended alternative and confirm project next steps. Water Works
Engineers will prepare a Workshop Presentation including:
 Alignment Alternatives – 15% Preliminary Layout Drawings (Plan view and select Profile views)
 Construction Constraints, summary (geotechnical, environmental, existing utilities, right-of-way,
easement, encroachment, concerns of key stakeholders, permitting, land-use);
 Facility Sizing / Design Criteria
o Transmission Pipeline
o Sodium Hypochlorite Feed System(s)
o Ammonia Feed System
o Flush-to-waste Piping
 Potential project phasing and tie-in strategies
 Route Analysis Cost Estimation (Soft and Hard Costs)
 Recommended Alternative
 Schedule Confirmation (confirm critical path items for planning and design, Environmental processing,
permit processing, right-of-way/easement procurement construction phasing,)
During Workshop, Water Works Engineers will field and address EVMWD questions and comments. Water
Works Engineers and EVMWD will leave the workshop with mutually agreed upon preferred alignment and
which optional preferred alignment design support services are to be completed as part of the project.
Meetings • Site Reconnaissance Meeting

• Route Analysis / Preferred Alignment Selection Workshop
Deliverables • None
SUBTASK 3.5 – PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT (PDR)

After Task 3.4.9 - Route Analysis / Preferred Alignment Selection Workshop, the Water Works Engineers will
continue with the Project into the design phase, beginning with the Preliminary Design Report (PDR), including
the 30% preliminary design of the recommended and approved pipeline alignment and facility design from Task
3.4.9. The PDR will be submitted to EVMWD twice; once in Draft form and then a Final PDR will be issued. Prior
to the submittal of the Draft and Final PDR, the work product will be reviewed internally through the QA/QC
process and, upon submittal to EVMWD, will have been reviewed and revised in accordance with the QA/QC
plan. After the Draft PDR is prepared and submitted, EVMWD Staff will have a 2-week review period to provide
comments to Water Works Engineers. Water Works Engineers will meet with EVMWD Staff to obtain feedback
and solicit questions and clarifications, as required, for inclusion in the Final PDR.
Water Works Engineers will conduct preliminary engineering analysis necessary to confirm feasibility of project
and set direction for detailed design. The design will include the following facilities:
1 Estimated 2,500-ft of 18-inch pipeline
2 Well 2A wellhead design (550 gpm at 340 psi discharge pressure)
Scope of Services
Page | 28
4 Chloramination Feed System Design (Separate sodium hypochlorite and ammonia feed system locations)
Water Works Engineers shall produce a Draft and Final PDR summarizing the scoped preliminary design services
described above under Task 3 – Preliminary Design. The PDR will include the following, at a minimum:
 Introduction and Background

o Summary of the preferred alignment analysis and selection process
o Operational objectives and constraints
 Design Criteria
 Project Description
o System Flows
o Process Description/Process Flow Diagram
o Hydraulic Calculations/Hydraulic Profile
o Waste Disposal
o Major Equipment Description
 Well 2A
 Well 3A
 Wellhead Facilities
 Sodium Hypochlorite Feed System
 Ammonia Feed System
 18-inch Transmission Pipeline
 Waste-to-Drain Pipeline
 Process Control System
 Facility Layout/General Equipment Layout
 Site Plan/Drainage
 Ancillary Systems
o Electrical
o HVAC
o Instrumentation and Controls
o Security
 Site Access
 Construction Sequencing
 Traffic Control Plan
 Permitting Requirements
 Preliminary Construction Schedule
 30% Drawings - Plan (and Profile if needed to convey design intent)
 Preliminary Cost Estimate (30% contingency)
Meetings • DRAFT Preliminary Design Report Review Meeting
Deliverables • Draft Preliminary Design Report (5 hard copies; Electronic version, .doc and .PDF)
• Final Preliminary Design Report (5 hard copies; Electronic version, .doc and .PDF)
Scope of Services
Page | 29
Task 4 – Base Sheet Preparation
Water Works Engineers will provide topographical survey data of the Project area to be utilized in the design
and presented on the construction plans for the Project improvements from an aerial mapping process and field
survey data. Topographical maps will show the following, at a minimum:
• Stream channels
• Floodway easements
• Street centerline
• Right-of-way
• Curb and gutter or edge of pavement
• Sewer and storm drain manholes
• Water valve covers, fire hydrants, catch basins and air/vac cans
• Telephone poles
• Fences on or near the right-of-way
• All other surface features within the potential construction zones and at least 10-feet outside of the
zone
• Street right-of-way topography
Task 4 – Base Sheet Preparation consists of the following subtasks:
SUBTASK 4.1 – AERIAL MAPPING

Aerial mapping will be provided within the yellow boundary shown in Figure 2 below. The aerial mapping will be
at a scale of 1” = 40’ with 1-foot contours. A color orthorectified photo will be provided. The aerial mapping will
be utilized in the preparation of the plan and profile sheets for the preliminary and final design of the Project
with a horizontal scale of 1” = 40’ and a vertical scale of 1” = 4’.
SUBTASK 4.2 – FIELD SURVEY

The field survey will be utilized to supplement the aerial mapping described in Subtask 4.1. The field survey will
be referenced to permanent monuments, not temporary project monuments. The field survey will tie in all
controlling monuments within the area identified within the yellow boundary shown in Figure 2 below (including
the well head facilities) and will contain a sufficient number of survey points to accurately complete the DTM.
SUBTASK 4.3 – BOUNDARY SURVEY WITH LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS

A boundary survey to support the needed legal descriptions to accommodate the new 18-inch pipe alignment
will be provided. A total of two legal descriptions (one preliminary and one final for each of the four) will be
provided as requested in Subtask 14.3 – Encroachment Permitting. It is assumed that EVMWD will provide an
up-to-date Preliminary Title Report with supporting documentation before the commencement of the boundary
survey.
Scope of Services
Page | 30
Figure 2. Project Survey Boundary
Meetings • None
Deliverables • None (utilized for Preliminary and Final Design Deliverables)
Task 5 – Geotechnical
Group Delta Consultants, Inc. (Group Delta) is a consulting geotechnical and environmental engineering firm that
will be performing the geotechnical investigation for Water Works Engineers to support the planning and design
of the proposed Project improvements. The geotechnical investigation scope of work is summarized in Subtask
5.1 – Soil Borings and Subtask 5.2 – Geotechnical Report below and Group Delta’s Proposal for Geotechnical
Investigation is provided in detail in the “Required Documentation” section near the end of this Proposal.
SUBTASK 5.1 – SOIL BORINGS

Group Delta will provide a total of four (20-ft deep) soil borings over the Project Site to adequately define the
soil properties affecting the design and construction of the proposed 18-inch pipeline to a depth of at least 4-ft
below the pipeline. Each soil boring will be located based on the project survey. Complete logs of the soil borings
will be included in the report and will include pavement and the associated sub-base thicknesses where
applicable.
Scope of Services
Page | 31
Meetings • None
Deliverables • Complete soil boring logs (included in the Geotechnical Report)
SUBTASK 5.2 – GEOTECHNICAL REPORT

Group Delta will provide a Geotechnical Report covering the following items:
• Soil Investigation Findings:

o Corrosive potential of the soil and ductile iron pipe, including testing for chlorites, sulfates, and
resistivity
o Soil pH
o Soil classification of each strata in accordance with Unified Soil Classification system
o Physical descriptions of the soils encountered
o Water table / ground water encountered
o Seasonal variations of water table
o Existing pavement and base material thickness
o In-situ unit weight and moisture content as tested by Consultant
o California Bearing Ratio (CBR) and/or Sand Equivalent values for soils under pavement that is
being replaced, if required, by the City of Wildomar or Caltrans
o Coefficients of internal friction and cohesion of in-situ undisturbed soils
o On-site Organic Vapor Analyzer (OVA) test results for potential hydrocarbon contaminants
o Benzene, Toluene and Xylene (BTX) text per EPA guideline 8020 and Total Hydrocarbons (TPH)
tests per EPA guideline, should the OVA reading be equal to or greater than 45 ppm
• Specification Recommendations:
o Dewatering
o Trench shoring
o Backfill Material and compaction
o Road base repair
o Corrosion protection
• Pipeline Design Recommendations:
o Pipe structural needs
o Pipe stability
o Type of pipe
o Corrosion protection
o Seismic concerns
o Specific construction concerns
o Integrity of the pipeline concerns
o Pavement concerns
o Near-by structures concerns
o Potential impact the pipeline excavation may have on all existing utility trenches in the vicinity
of the new pipeline
o Applicability of use of the native versus imported material as backfill in the trench zone and
upper zone
Scope of Services
Page | 32
The Geotechnical Report will be submitted to EVMWD for comment. Any comments received from EVMWD will
be addressed through a revision or the Geotechnical Report or by addendum. The final Geotechnical Report will
be submitted prior to the 100% Design Submittal and included in the Specifications as an attachment.
Meetings • None
Deliverables • Geotechnical Report (Electronic version; .PDF)
• Final Geotechnical Report (Electronic version; .PDF)
FINAL DESIGN
Water Works Engineers will prepare the necessary contract documents (construction plans, typical details,
specifications, and cost estimates) for the project, based on the design criteria, recommendations and 30%
Preliminary Plans included in the Preliminary Design Report, input from EVMWD staff, and in conformance with
EVMWD’s standards and specifications for equipment preferences. If provided, Water Works Engineers will use
EVMWD standard front end (Division 0) contractual documents (Contract, General Conditions, Special Project
Conditions, Bid Form, etc.) If none provided, Water Works Engineers will use readily available Water Works
Engineers provided Division 0 bid documents. The preparation of contract documents will be completed in
three submittals: 75%, 95% and 100% (Bid Documents) Submittal Documents. Prior to each submittal, the work
product will be reviewed through Water Works Engineers QA/QC process and, upon submittal to the EVMWD,
will have been reviewed and revised in accordance with the QA/QC plan.
EVMWD may elect to perform the review of the 75% and 95% design submittals in one of two ways (no change
in schedule or fee) as shown in Option A and B below:
Option A – Submittal Review Meeting (as shown in the Project Schedule):

1. Submit Design Submittal
2. EVMWD Review (75% - 2 weeks; 95% - 3 weeks)
3. Design Review Meeting
Option B – Submittal Review Workshop:

1. Submit Design Submittal and Hold Submittal Review Workshop
2. EVMWD Review (75% - 2 weeks; 95% - 3 weeks)
In the case that EVMWD chooses Option B – Submittal Review Workshop, the contents of the submittal will be
presented to EVMWD to familiarize the group with the information being submitted and the design thought
process behind the work. Following the Project Review Workshop, the EVMWD will have a 2- or 3-week review
period to provide any additional comments which were not brought forward in the review workshop.
For the purposes of quantifying effort and fee for this scope of services, it is assumed that one set of Bid
Documents shall be developed for this project. Production of multiple sets of separate independent Bid
Documents to support phased public bidding of construction shall be considered additional services.
The design will include drawings and technical specifications necessary for public bid, include the following
major components of the Project:
Scope of Services
Page | 33
1 Estimated 2,500-ft of 18-inch pipeline
4 Chloramination Feed System Design (Separate sodium hypochlorite and ammonia feed system locations)
Task 6 – 75% Design Submittal

The 75% design submittal will communicate to the EVMWD the project design so that meaningful discussion can
take place and the core project decisions can be made as a group. Water Works will use a combination of design
drawings, 3-dimensional CADD models, manufacturers’ information and other communication tools to allow the
EVMWD an opportunity for significant input into the design process.
Water Works Engineers will utilize the expertise of ZZ Technology to study the effects of surge on the 18-inch
pipeline. Transient studies would include pump startup and shutdown scenarios for both wells. Performance of
surge control devices would be evaluated including air chamber, vacuum relief valves and/or pressure relief
valves as deemed appropriate. Using SURGE software, the results will be presented in text and graphical
formats. To accurately model the transients created on shutdown the following hydraulic design data should be
available:
• Inside diameter and material of proposed piping.
• Pipeline profiles including lengths and elevations.
• Design flow rates, pump curves and nodal demands
• Reservoir level elevations
• Valve type and opening/closing speed
The following deliverables will be provided by Water Works Engineers with this submittal:
1) Drawings:
a) Pipeline (18-inch Main)
i) Plan & Profile
ii) Trench Detail
iii) Trenchless Crossing Detail (if any)
iv) Basic mechanical layout of pressure reducing / flow metering stations
v) Street Repair Identification and Details
b) Wellhead
i) Structural/Mechanical (Plan and Sections; Utilize and modify Record Drawings if feasible)
ii) Details
c) Chemical Feed Systems
i) Structural/Mechanical (Plan and Sections)
ii) Details
d) Electrical
e) Instrumentation
f) Traffic and Detour Plans
2) Project Specific Technical Specifications:
a) Table of Contents
b) Technical Provisions
c) Standard Drawings List
d) Bid Items List
Scope of Services
Page | 34
e) Special Project Constraints
i) Environmental Requirements/Controls
ii) Utility Requirements
iii) Jurisdictional Agency Requirements
3) Surge Analysis
4) Construction Cost Estimate (Class 2)
5) Construction Schedule
6) Permitting
a) Prepare and process all permit applications (fees paid by EVMWD)
Meetings • 75% Design Review Meeting
Deliverables • 75% Design Drawings (4 Full and Half Size hardcopies and .PDFs)
• 75% Specifications, Cost Estimate and Schedule(8 hardcopies and .PDFs)

In general, the 95% Design Submittal will be a complete project package, with all design drawings, details and
specifications completed. The period between 95% and 100% should solely be dedicated to minor inter-
disciplinary coordination and final QA/QC checking of all documents. In the 95% submittal, 2-dimensional plan
and section drawings are incorporated with 3-dimensional isometrics to clearly show how complex piping
systems are to be constructed. In addition to the items listed for the previous submittal, the following will be
provided with this submittal:
1) Drawings (update 75% and add):
a) Cover Sheet
b) Notes
c) Details
2) Completion of all technical specifications, including draft EVMWD Division 0 and 1 “front-end” documents
(if available) or Water Works Engineers Standard.
3) Final Geotechnical Report (as outlined previously)
4) Construction Cost Estimate (Class 1)
5) 75% Design Submittal Comment Responses
6) Constructability Review Meeting (with EVMWD and Water Works Engineer’s PM and Constructability Team)
a) Project economics
b) Construction Staging
c) Availability of Materials
d) Site Restrictions
e) Local Condition Effects
f) Environmental Considerations
Scope of Services
Page | 35
Meetings • 95% Design Review Meeting
• Constructability Review Meeting (including Field Review)
Deliverables • 95% Design Drawings (4 Full and Half Size hardcopies and .PDFs)
• 95% Specifications, Cost Estimate and Schedule(8 hardcopies and .PDFs)

The Final Bid Documents Submittal incorporates comments provided by the EVMWD at the 95% design stage
and/or QA/QC comments generated by Water Works Engineers’ QA/QC review team, with particular emphasis
on formatting and clean-up to ensure clear and legible reproduction. In addition to the items listed for the
previous submittal, the following will be provided with this submittal:
• Design Calculations
• Utility Search Documentation
• Survey Documentation
• Certification of Quality Assurance
• 95% Design Submittal Comment Responses
Meetings • None
Deliverables • Bid Documents (Plans and Specifications)

o PDF – electronically stamped and signed for reproduction
o Hard Copy - Wet stamped and signed
 1 copy - 22 x 34 Mylar Drawings
 1 copy - Division 0-16 Specifications – Reproducible; bound as deemed
appropriate
o AutoCAD Drawings
o MS Word Specifications
Task 9 – Bidding Services

Water Works Engineers will provide the following Bidding Services during the bidding period for the Project:
1) Conduct Pre‐bid Meeting

2) Respond to contractor inquiries during bid advertisement
3) Prepare and distribute addenda to bidders as required
4) Review bids received, make recommendation to the OWNER
Meetings • Pre-Bid Meeting
Deliverables • Addenda as Required

• Bid Recommendation Letter
Scope of Services
Page | 36
Task 10 – Construction Services
Water Works Engineers will provide the following Engineering Services During Construction for the Project. A
total construction schedule of 10-months is assumed. Please note that the following scope and associated fee is
representative of the minimum level generally required.
1) Pre-Construction Meeting
2) Submittal Reviews
a) Up to 100 submittals; 2-hrs per submittal review
3) Request For Information/Clarification (RFI/RFC) review, documentation and tracking
a) Up to 30 RFI/RFCs; 1-hr per RFI/RFC
4) Construction Issue Meetings
a) Up to 20 meetings; 2 meetings per month over 10-month construction schedule; 2-hrs per meeting
5) Production of Record Drawings
6) Change Order Request review, documentation and tracking
a) Up to 15 CORs; 1.5-hr per COR
Meetings • Pre-Construction Meeting

• Construction Issue Meetings
Deliverables • Submittal Reviews (up to 100)
• RFI/RFC Responses (up to 30)
• Record Drawings
o PDF
o Hard Copy: 1 copy - 22 x 34 Mylar Drawings
o AutoCAD Drawings
• Change Order Request Review (up to 15)
Task 11 – QA/QC and Project Administration

Under each task and subtask, Water Works Engineers will monitor and track the project budget and schedule to
ensure that all deadlines are met and that the project budget is not exceeded. Water Works Engineers will
coordinate with the project team to address items such as project schedule, project budget, and current issues
of concern. Water Works Engineers will also monitor progress and coordinate the activities being performed by
all sub-consultants associated with the project, and submit monthly progress reports to the EVMWD. The
following will be performed under this subtask:
1) Technical Review and Quality Assurance/Quality Control

a) Engage Technical Review Committee in project at strategic times to provide feedback on project
technical decisions.
b) Plan and implement Quality Assurance/ Quality Control Policy with the entire project team including in-
house “3rd-party” review
c) Ensure QA/QC procedures are being followed at each step in the design process including, but not
limited to planning, coordination, cost control, checking, reviewing and scheduling the work
d) Principal-in-Charge review of each submittal prior to submission to EVMWD
2) Document Printing (during project development) and Checking Bid Documents
Scope of Services
Page | 37
3) Complete EVMWD Comment Response Log for each deliverable requiring EVMWD review
4) Project Communication and Control
a) Coordination of all project team activities
b) Communication of project progress and issues to EVMWD staff
i) Monthly Progress Report
(1) Current activities
(2) Future activities
(3) Potential out of scope items
(4) Concerns, problems and potential delays
(5) % Complete
(6) Budget status
ii) Maintain online decision log and action item list and follow-up completion with EVMWD
c) Monthly project schedule maintenance and control of project tasks to keep project schedule on track
d) Monthly Billing
e) Cost tracking of all engineering activities and active cost control of fees.
Meetings • None
Deliverables • EVMWD Comment Response Logs

• Submittal QA/QC Principal-in-Charge Acknowledgments
• Monthly Progress Reports (hardcopies and electronic)
• Monthly Schedule Update
• Monthly Billing
• Online Decision Log
Task 12 – Meeting and Communication

SUBTASK 12.1 - DESIGN MEETINGS
Water Works Engineers will hold design meetings with EVMWD Staff as requested to review the work in
progress, report problems and concerns and receive comments on the Contract Documents. Water Works
Engineers will prepare meeting agendas and meeting minutes (to be submitted to EVMWD within 3 working
days) for all meetings. Design review meetings will be held as described in Tasks 6, 7 and 8.
SUBTASK 12.2 – COMMUNICATION

Water Works Engineers is dedicated to “open and often” communication to keep EVMWD informed of all
project developments. This communication may take many forms, depending on the time sensitivity and
importance of the message or question by telephone, email or mail. Water Works Engineers will document
significant correspondence, including meeting minutes and copy EVMWD. A design decision matrix will serve as
a “living document” that will be continually updated as required throughout the Project. The matrix will be
regularly updated and submitted to EVMWD.
Scope of Services
Page | 38
SUBTASK 12.3 - SPECIAL MEETINGS
Upon the request of EVMWD, Water Works Engineers will attend meetings that may be required by the various
jurisdictional agencies, utilities or other Project Participant. Water Works Engineers will prepare displays or
materials as needed by EVMWD for such meetings.
Meetings • Design Meetings (Total of 5; 2-hr meetings)

• Special Meetings (Total of 5; 2-hr meetings)
Deliverables • Design Meeting Agendas and Meeting Minutes
• Design Decision Matrix
• Special Meeting Displays and Materials
Task 13 – Project Design Schedule

Water Works Engineers will update the Project Design Schedule (See “Schedule” Section below) monthly as
described in Task 11 – QA/QC and Project Administration.
Meetings • None
Deliverables • Monthly Project Design Schedule Update
Task 14 – Right Of Way

SUBTASK 14.1 – PIPELINE (OPTIONAL)
The 18-inch transmission line may require additional permanent right of way (ROW) if it is located outside of the
street ROW. Water Works will prepare the potential required legal descriptions, condemnation documents,
property appraisals and exhibits for the acquisition of ROW. Water Works Engineers has assumed that legal
descriptions for two properties only will be required for this subtask. This subtask is optional and is reflected
thus in the associated scope and fee for the Project.
SUBTASK 14.2 – AMMONIA FEED SITING (OPTIONAL)

EVMWD anticipates the siting of the ammonia feed system to be located on the private JW Mitchell Land Co.
property north of Cajalco Road. If Water Works Engineers verifies the siting of the chemical feed system at this
location, then EVMWD would then initiate the acquisition of the property and Water Works Engineers would
provide a legal plat and description and appraisal of the property. This subtask is optional and is reflected thus in
the associated scope and fee for the Project.
SUBTASK 14.3 – ENCROACHMENT PERMITTING

Water Works Engineers shall determine the encroachment permit requirements of the County of Riverside,
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Management District and the City of Corona. All correspondence with
these agencies will be documented and any encroachment permit requirements will be reflected in the
construction contract documents.
Meetings • None
Deliverables • Pipeline ROW Acquisition Documents
Scope of Services
Page | 39
o Legal Descriptions (Total of 2)
• Ammonia Feed Siting ROW Acquisition Documents
o Legal Descriptions (Total of 1)
• Encroachment Permitting Assistance Correspondence Recording
Scope of Services
Page | 40
Water Works Engineers Hours Estimate
Client Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
Project Flagler Wells Conversion Pipeline
Task Order No 1
Prepared by Andrew Borgic
Date 10/22/2014
Page 1 of 2
Hours and Fee
Task 1 Task 2 Subtask 3.1 Subtask 3.2 Subtask 3.3 Subtask 3.4 Subtask 3.5 Task 4 Task 5 Task 6 Task 7 Task 8
Year 2014 2014 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2014 2015 2015 2015
Kick‐Off Meeting
Utility Research and Environmental Preliminary Design Preliminary Design Base Sheet 95% Design 100% Design
Project Review and Project Potholing Geotechnical 75% Design Submittal
Agency Contact Documentation Route Selection Report Preparation Submittal Submittal
Review Findings
Water Works Engineers 2014 hrs fee hrs fee hrs fee hrs fee hrs fee hrs fee hrs fee hrs fee hrs fee hrs fee hrs fee hrs fee
Classification Title
AA Administrative
T1 Drafter/Jr. Technician
T2 Designer/Sr. Technican
4 8 40 8 100 60 20
T3 Senior Designer 4 2 20 4
E1 Staff Engineer 24 4 60 40 80 40 20
E2 Associate Engineer
E3 Project Engineer
E4 Structural Engineer 4 32 24 12
E2 Associate Elec. Eng. 60 24 16
E4 Sr. Elec. and I&C Eng. 10 16 40 16 8
E4 Sr. Project Engineer/PM 8 16 3 2 4 40 32 4 56 24 12
E5 Principal Engineer 2 8 4 2 4 4 2
Expenses
WWE Expenses
Subconsultants Environmental (CEQA/EIR) Lump Sum Fee Provided; No hours reported
Surveying Lump Sum Fee Provided; No hours reported
Potholing Lump Sum Fee Provided; No hours reported
Traffic Control Lump Sum Fee Provided; No hours reported
Surge Analysis Lump Sum Fee Provided; No hours reported
Geotech. Subconsultant
Group Delta Consultants, Inc.
Classification Title Hourly Rate
Sr. Engineer 3
Field Engineer 20
Geologist/Engineer 30
Drafter 8
Project Manager 4
Admin 2
Drill Rig Lump Sum Fee Provided; No hours reported
Soils Testing Lump Sum Fee Provided; No hours reported
Utility Location Service Lump Sum Fee Provided; No hours reported
Special Soil Testing Lump Sum Fee Provided; No hours reported
Subconsultant Markup $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Annual Increase for WWE rates of
Subtask Totals 10 $0 34 $0 27 $0 10 $0 12 $0 104 $0 138 $0 14 $0 67 $0 392 $0 192 $0 94 $0
Water Works Engineers Hours Estimate
Client Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
Project Flagler Wells Conversion Pipeline
Task Order No 1
Prepared by Andrew Borgic
Date 10/22/2014
Page 2 of 2
Task 9 Task 10 Task 11 Task 12 Task 13 Subtask 14.1 Subtask 14.2 Subtask 14.3

Year 2015 2016 2015 2015 2014 2015 2015 2015
Right Of Way ‐ Right Of Way ‐ Right Of Way ‐
QA/QC and Project Meetings and
Bidding Services Construction Services Project Design Schedule Pipeline Ammonia Feed Siting Encroachment
Administration Communication
(Optional) (Optional) Permitting
Water Works Engineers 2014 hrs fee hrs fee hrs fee hrs fee hrs fee hrs fee hrs fee hrs fee
AA Administrative 8
T1 Drafter/Jr. Technician
T2 Designer/Sr. Technican
T3 Senior Designer
E1 Staff Engineer 4 52.5 32 5 8 8 8
E2 Associate Engineer
E3 Project Engineer
E4 Structural Engineer
E2 Associate Elec. Eng.
E4 Sr. Elec. and I&C Eng. 2 20 8
E4 Sr. Project Engineer/PM 8 16 40 20 2
E5 Principal Engineer 12
Expenses
WWE Expenses
Subconsultants Environmental (CEQA/EIR) Lump Sum Fee Provided; No hours reported
Surveying Lump Sum Fee Provided; No hours reported
Potholing Lump Sum Fee Provided; No hours reported
Traffic Control Lump Sum Fee Provided; No hours reported
Surge Analysis Lump Sum Fee Provided; No hours reported
Geotech. Subconsultant
Sr. Engineer
Field Engineer
Geologist/Engineer
Drafter
Project Manager
Admin
Drill Rig Lump Sum Fee Provided; No hours reported
Soils Testing Lump Sum Fee Provided; No hours reported
Utility Location Service Lump Sum Fee Provided; No hours reported
Special Soil Testing Lump Sum Fee Provided; No hours reported
Subconsultant Markup $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Annual Increase for WWE rates of
Subtask Totals 14 $0 88.5 $0 100 $0 20 $0 7 $0 8 $0 8 $0 8 $0
Project Total
Hours
Includes Optional Tasks 14.1 and 14.2 1348
ID Task Task Name Duration Start Finish Oct '14 Jan '15 Apr '15 Jul '15 Oct '15 Jan '16 Apr '16 Jul '16
Mode 9/14 10/26 12/7 1/18 3/1 4/12 5/24 7/5 8/16 9/27 11/8 12/20 1/31 3/13 4/24 6/5 7/17
1 Total Project Duration (Design through Startup) 470 days? Thu 10/16/14 Wed 8/3/16
2 Planning and Design 218 days? Thu 10/16/14 Mon 8/17/15
3 Submit Proposal 0 days Thu 10/16/14 Thu 10/16/14 10/16
4 Obtain Board approval to Award PSA 32 days Thu 10/16/14 Fri 11/28/14
5 Sign PSA 0 days Fri 11/28/14 Fri 11/28/14 11/28
6 Task 1 ‐ Project Review 5 days Mon 12/1/14 Fri 12/5/14
7 Riverside County Flood Control District Meeting 5 days Mon 12/1/14 Fri 12/5/14
8 Contact City of Corona and County of Riverside 5 days Mon 12/1/14 Fri 12/5/14
9 Task 2 ‐ KO Meeting and Proj. Review Findings 5 days Mon 12/8/14 Fri 12/12/14
10 Kickoff Meeting Preparation 5 days Mon 12/8/14 Fri 12/12/14
11 Kick‐off Meeting 0 days Fri 12/12/14 Fri 12/12/14 12/12
12 Task 3 ‐ Preliminary Design 142 days Mon 12/1/14 Tue 6/16/15
13 Utility Research and Agency Contact 15 days Mon 12/1/14 Fri 12/19/14
14 Notification and Determination of Scheduled Projects 10 days Mon 12/1/14 Fri 12/12/14
15 Request and Obtain USA Substructure Listing 1 day Mon 12/1/14 Mon 12/1/14

16 Utility Research, Detailed Search and Documentation 15 days Mon 12/1/14 Fri 12/19/14
17 Onsite Utility Inspection 0 days Fri 12/19/14 Fri 12/19/14 12/19

18 Potholing 25 days Mon 12/22/14 Fri 1/23/15
19 Pothole Plan 15 days Mon 12/22/14 Fri 1/9/15
20 Prepare Pothole Plan 5 days Mon 12/22/14 Fri 12/26/14
21 Submit Pothole Plan 0 days Fri 12/26/14 Fri 12/26/14 12/26
22 EVMWD Review 10 days Mon 12/29/14 Fri 1/9/15
23 Potholing 5 days Mon 1/12/15 Fri 1/16/15
24 Pothole Results 5 days Mon 1/19/15 Fri 1/23/15
25 Environmental 142 days Mon 12/1/14 Tue 6/16/15
26 Phase 1 ‐ Environmental Constraints Analysis 20 days Mon 12/1/14 Fri 12/26/14
27 Review potential alignments 5 days Mon 12/1/14 Fri 12/5/14
28 Perform Biol./Cult. Recon. Survey 5 days Mon 12/8/14 Fri 12/12/14
29 Prelim. Env. Evaluation of Possible Alignments 10 days Mon 12/15/14 Fri 12/26/14
30 Phase 2 ‐ CEQA Compliance and Documentation & 87 days Mon 2/16/15 Tue 6/16/15
Permitting
31 Technical Studies 20 days Mon 2/16/15 Fri 3/13/15
32 Initial Study/Mitigated Neg. Decl. (MND) 77 days Mon 3/2/15 Tue 6/16/15
33 Prepare Initial Study/MND 20 days Mon 3/2/15 Fri 3/27/15
34 Prepare Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting 20 days Mon 3/2/15 Fri 3/27/15
Program (MMRP)
35 Draft IS/MND Submittal to EVMWD 0 days Fri 3/27/15 Fri 3/27/15 3/27
Task Project Summary Manual Task Start-only Deadline
Project: EVMWD_Flagler Wells P Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only Progress

Date: Wed 10/22/14 Milestone Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Manual Progress
Summary Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone
Page 1
Mode 9/14 10/26 12/7 1/18 3/1 4/12 5/24 7/5 8/16 9/27 11/8 12/20 1/31 3/13 4/24 6/5 7/17
36 EVMWD Draft IS/MND Review 10 days Mon 3/30/15 Fri 4/10/15
37 Prepare Final DRAFT IS/MND 47 days Mon 4/13/15 Tue 6/16/15
38 Public Review Period 30 days Mon 4/13/15 Fri 5/22/15
39 Review and Prepare Responses to PR Comments 5 days Mon 5/25/15 Fri 5/29/15
40 Final IS/MND Submittal to EVMWD 0 days Fri 5/29/15 Fri 5/29/15 5/29

41 EVMWD Final IS/MND Review 10 days Mon 6/1/15 Fri 6/12/15
42 Submit Final IS/MND 2 days Mon 6/15/15 Tue 6/16/15
43 File Notice of Determination 0 days Tue 6/16/15 Tue 6/16/15 6/16
44 Preliminary Design Route Selection 25 days Mon 1/12/15 Fri 2/13/15
45 Route Selection Preparation 20 days Mon 1/12/15 Fri 2/6/15
46 Route Selection Workshop 0 days Fri 2/6/15 Fri 2/6/15 2/6
47 Route Selection Review by EVMWD 5 days Mon 2/9/15 Fri 2/13/15
48 Preferred Alignment and Options Selected 0 days Fri 2/13/15 Fri 2/13/15 2/13
49 Preliminary Design Report (PDR) 60 days Mon 1/12/15 Fri 4/3/15
50 Draft PDR 55 days Mon 1/12/15 Fri 3/27/15
51 Report Preparation 40 days Mon 1/12/15 Fri 3/6/15
52 30% Design Plan Preparation 30 days Mon 2/2/15 Fri 3/13/15
53 Submit 30% Design 0 days Fri 3/13/15 Fri 3/13/15 3/13
54 EVMWD 30% Design Review 10 days Mon 3/16/15 Fri 3/27/15
55 30% Design Review Meeting 0 days Fri 3/27/15 Fri 3/27/15 3/27
56 Final PDR 5 days Mon 3/30/15 Fri 4/3/15
57 Prepare Final PDR 5 days Mon 3/30/15 Fri 4/3/15
58 Submit Final PDR 0 days Fri 4/3/15 Fri 4/3/15 4/3
59 Task 4 ‐ Base Sheet Preparation 5 days Mon 12/15/14 Fri 12/19/14
60 Field Survey 5 days Mon 12/15/14 Fri 12/19/14
61 Aerial Survey 5 days Mon 12/15/14 Fri 12/19/14
62 Task 5 ‐ Geotechnical 56 days? Mon 12/1/14 Mon 2/16/15
63 Geotechnical Investigation 16 days Mon 12/1/14 Mon 12/22/14
64 Research 5 days Mon 12/1/14 Fri 12/5/14
65 Field Work 11 days Mon 12/8/14 Mon 12/22/14
66 Geotechnical Report 40 days? Tue 12/23/14 Mon 2/16/15
67 Prepare Draft Geotechnical Report 20 days Tue 12/23/14 Mon 1/19/15
68 Submit Draft Geotechnical Report 0 days Mon 1/19/15 Mon 1/19/15 1/19
69 EVMWD Review 10 days Tue 1/20/15 Mon 2/2/15
70 Prepare Final Geotechnical Report 10 days Tue 2/3/15 Mon 2/16/15
71 Submit Final Geotechnical Report 0 days Mon 2/16/15 Mon 2/16/15 2/16
72

Page 2
Mode 9/14 10/26 12/7 1/18 3/1 4/12 5/24 7/5 8/16 9/27 11/8 12/20 1/31 3/13 4/24 6/5 7/17
73 Task 6 ‐ 75% Submittal 40 days Mon 3/30/15 Fri 5/22/15
78 Task 7 ‐ 95% Submittal 36 days Mon 5/25/15 Mon 7/13/15
83 Constructability Review Meeting 1 day Mon 7/13/15 Mon 7/13/15
84 Task 8 ‐ 100% Submittal 25 days Tue 7/14/15 Mon 8/17/15
85 100% Design Plan Preparation 10 days Tue 7/14/15 Mon 7/27/15
86 Submit 100% Design 0 days Mon 7/27/15 Mon 7/27/15 7/27
87 EVMWD 100% Design Review 10 days Tue 7/28/15 Mon 8/10/15
88 Prepare Final 100% Design 5 days Tue 8/11/15 Mon 8/17/15
89 Submit Final 100% Design 0 days Mon 8/17/15 Mon 8/17/15 8/17
90 Task 9 ‐ Bidding Services 32 days Tue 8/18/15 Wed 9/30/15
91 Bid Period Support 30 days Tue 8/18/15 Mon 9/28/15
92 Bid Review 0 days Mon 9/28/15 Mon 9/28/15 9/28
93 Submit Bid Review Memorandum 2 days Tue 9/29/15 Wed 9/30/15
94 Task 10 ‐ Construction Services 220 days Thu 10/1/15 Wed 8/3/16
95 Construction 200 days Thu 10/1/15 Wed 7/6/16
96 Submit Record Drawings 20 days Thu 7/7/16 Wed 8/3/16
97 Task 11 ‐ QA/QC and Project Admin. 438 days Mon 12/1/14 Wed 8/3/16
98 Task 12 ‐ Meetings and Communication 418 days Mon 12/1/14 Wed 7/6/16
99 Task 13 ‐ Project Design Schedule 10 days Mon 12/1/14 Fri 12/12/14
100 Task 14 ‐ Right Of Way 90 days Mon 2/16/15 Fri 6/19/15

Page 3
RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL
Project Team Organization
Water Works Engineers has assembled a highly qualified, professional, experienced construction management
and application programming team for this project. For each project role, experienced professional engineers
will bring to bear not only their knowledge of construction management and techniques, but their engineering
experience and mindset, understanding of the design details of this specific project, and unwavering drive for
excellence in their finished work product. The following organizational chart summarizes the team organization.
Project Manager
Andrew Borgic, PE
Principal in Charge Technical Director

Sami Kader, PE * Mike Fisher, PE*
Chemical Treatment Systems Pipeline Design
QA/QC
Jim Gesebracht, PE
Project Engineering
Andrew Borgic, PE – Process/Mechanical SUBCONSULTANTS
Gilbert Fuentes, PE – Civil/Mechanical Environmental
Jeremy Kellogg, PE – Structural Dudek
Greg Fron, PE - Electrical Geotech
CADD Group Delta, Inc.
Craig Worrall – Sr. Designer/CADD Survey
Josh Martin – Designer/CADD Andregg Geomatics
Perry Webster Designer/CADD Potholing
VCI Contractors
Surge Analysis
*Constructability Team Member
ZZ Technology
Scope of Services
Page | 46
Water Works Engineers
Our principals and staff have extensive experience with facilities representing a broad range of size and
complexity and continually strive to provide practical approaches to projects. Our focus and work approaches
allow us to provide high-quality planning and design products very efficiently. Our significant construction
management experience allows us to plan and design with an eye towards implementation. We have a strong
track record of completing complex projects that leave both Owners and Contractors proud of the job that
was done.
Based on our experiences, we strongly believe that people execute projects, not firms. For that reason, our
team is committing high-quality, senior staff with in-depth experience directly relevant to this project. These are
experienced professionals who have been directly involved in multiple water storage, treatment and pump
station evaluations, designs, and construction projects.
SAMI KADER, P.E.

Principal in Charge/ Technical Advisor - Chemical Treatment Systems and Member of Constructability Team
Sami has built his 19 year career on understanding EVMWD needs and providing superior EVMWD service in
every aspect of his work. Sami is a Principal at Water Works Engineers and serves as a technical advisor for many
major projects for the firm. Sami will be in charge of overseeing the construction as well verifying
implementation of the quality control procedures for this project. Sami has built his 18-year career on
understanding EVMWD needs and providing superior EVMWD service in every aspect of his work. He is a civil
design and construction engineer who has worked as a project manager, design manager, project engineer and
construction manager for over $250M of water and wastewater facility projects. His extensive construction
administration experience provides him with a real-world practical knowledge of the application of design
documents and details during construction and provides insight in the creation of constructible, practical design
documents.
MIKE FISHER, P.E.

Technical Director/Technical Advisor - Pipeline Design and Member of Constructability Team
Mike is a civil/sanitary design engineer with over 19 years of experience in distribution and collection system
pumping, pipeline and storage projects. He has worked as a lead engineer and Project Manager for both large
and small design projects and has conducted multiple conceptual and preliminary engineering evaluations in
support of final design projects. He is proficient at hydraulic modeling, existing infrastructure condition
assessment, preparation of engineering plans and specifications, cost estimation, right-of-way assessment, and
permitting assistance. His core area of expertise is infrastructure rehabilitation and replacement, with specific
emphasis on mechanical design, lining of concrete structures for corrosion resistance, and trenchless pipeline
replacement. He is certified in pipe-bursting and cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) best design and construction
practices by the North American Society for Trenchless Technologies (NASTT). Mike is a CWEA subject matter
expert on WDR-SSO compliance, SSMP development and O&M efficiency analysis.
JIM GESELBRACHT, P.E.

Principal/Quality Assurance and Quality Control
Jim Geselbracht has over 32 years’ experience in water and wastewater system planning, design and operations.
He has extensive experience with a variety of water reclamation and wastewater treatment technologies. A
Principal of Water Works Engineers, Jim is WWE’s Chief Engineer, and in this role, he is a Technical Advisor for all
major projects for the firm. Jim has been involved in the planning, design, construction, start-up and operation
Scope of Services
Page | 47
of dozens of water supply systems of similar scale and complexity to the implementing WWE quality control
procedures for this project.
ANDREW BORGIC, P.E.

Project Manager
Andrew is a water/wastewater process design engineer with over nine years of experience in large and small
civil water and wastewater treatment projects, including feasibility studies, alternatives analyses, and design for
treatment plant upgrades and modifications. He has specific experience in treatment unit selection, closed‐
conduit and open channel hydraulic modeling, and other computer applications, including WaterCAD, for
designing and optimizing water and wastewater distribution and conveyance systems. Typical duties include
technical report preparation, cost estimate preparation, preparation of contract drawings and specifications,
EVMWD interaction, contractor interaction, field visits, inspections, and engineering services during
construction.
GILBERT FUENTES, P.E.

Staff Engineer
Gilbert Fuentes is a water/wastewater process design engineer with over 4 years of experience in groundwater
remediation and treatment projects, including, alternatives analyses, process selection, design and construction
oversight. Gilbert has a long history of working with regulatory agencies, construction contractors and project
owners to delivery efficient, effective projects. He has most recently been integral to the work that Water Works
Engineers is providing for the Cal Water Dominguez Well 275-01 and 294-01 Treatment Facility Project, working
with Andrew to see that project to a successful conclusion, and will assist Andrew in the execution of all phases
of this project.
JEREMY KELLOGG, P.E., S.E.
Structural Engineer
Jeremy is a structural design engineer with over 10 years of experience in design and construction. He is well
versed in the analysis and design of various structures including buildings, bridges, retaining structures, and
miscellaneous agricultural and industrial structures. His structures are designed with various materials including
steel, concrete, wood, and masonry. Typical duties include structural calculations for lateral and vertical loads,
preparation of contract drawings and specifications, coordination with EVMWDs and contractors, and structural
observation and construction support. His thorough understanding of both static and dynamic loading allows
him to develop creative and cost effective solutions to our EVMWD’s structural engineering needs
GREG FRON, P.E.

Electrical Engineer
Greg has over 25 years of experience in electrical instrumentation and controls engineering and contracting
projects involving industrial and water/wastewater projects. Mr. Fron brings with him a wealth of experience
with specialty and general electrical and instrumentation and controls (I&C) design and management including
power distribution, DCS/PLCs, SCADA, instrumentation, custom electrical controls, remote telemetry/terminal
units (RTU) networks, equipment specifications, site evaluations, project estimates, bid services, construction
support, project startup and warranty service coordination
CRAIG WORRALL, C.E.T.

Lead Designer
Craig serves as lead engineering technician and lead mechanical technician for design projects primarily
involving water and wastewater treatment, pumping, and conveyance facilities. Craig has 28 years of experience
in the production and management of water and wastewater treatment and conveyance projects and has been
Scope of Services
Page | 48
responsible for producing computer‐aided drafting and design (CADD) and manually drafted drawings from
project start to finish. He coordinates drawings between civil, mechanical, structural, and electrical disciplines.
Craig is proficient in AutoCAD, MicroStation V8, MicroStation 3D, Triforma, and other software applications.

Group Delta Consultants, Inc. 1320 S. Simpson Circle, Anaheim, CA 92806 (714) 660-7500
Water Works Engineers’ geotechnical engineering teaming partner is Group Delta Consultants, Inc. (GDC).
Group Delta Consultants is geotechnical engineering, materials testing and inspection firm having offices located
in Irvine, Torrance, Ontario, San Diego, the Bay Area, and Victorville, California. GDC has a staff of 125+ highly
skilled professionals consisting of civil and geotechnical engineers, engineering geologists, laboratory and field
technicians, deputy inspectors, drafting/CADD, and drilling and support personnel specialized in their respective
fields. In addition, we have licensed and experienced deputy inspectors and technicians specialized in their
respective fields (including concrete, masonry, batch plant, fireproofing, shotcrete, soils, structural steel, non-
destructive testing and welding) to provide construction observation and testing services.
GDC provides exceptionally innovative and dependable geotechnical consulting, environmental consulting, and
construction management testing services for public and private sector EVMWDs throughout Southern
California.
Andregg Geomatics
Andregg Geomatics. 6151 W. Century Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90045 (310-649-5312
Founded in 1946, Andregg Geomatics is a management owned, certified small business with extensive
experience providing surveying, mapping, geomatics, and land planning services to EVMWDs for both public and
private sector projects. The firm is headquartered in Auburn, CA, with offices in Truckee, Sacramento, Oakland,
and Los Angeles.
To meet EVMWD’s needs, Andregg provides surveying for transportation, water, public works and land
development projects. Andregg’s diverse project portfolio includes surveying and mapping for large
transportation projects, treatment plants, commercial and residential developments, pipelines, schools, public
works projects and highways. The firm has performed hydrographic surveys, mapped FEMA-designed flood
plans, conducted surveying and right-of-way engineering for government agencies and developed geodetic
control networks for numerous cities and agencies.
Dudek
Dudek. 3685 Main Street, Suite 250, Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 300-2100
Dudekis a California-focused environmental firm with more than 330 environmental planners, scientists,
designers, civil engineers, contractors, and support staff. For over 34 years, we have assisted public works
EVMWDs on a broad range of projects that improve California’s communities, infrastructure, and natural
environment. From planning, design, and permitting through construction, we help move projects forward
through the complexities of regulatory compliance, budgetary and schedule constraints, and conflicting
stakeholder interests. Dudek staff is highly skilled in planning, entitlement application processing, project
Scope of Services
Page | 49
management, environmental review, and public outreach. We have prepared over 1,700 legally defensible
environmental documents statewide.
Dudek’s environmental planners are experts serving as independent, neutral staff. They combine comprehensive
analysis and evidence-based findings to provide legally defensible documents that can help sustain your EVMWD
findings should, environmental decisions be challenged in court.
ZZ Technology
ZZ Technology. 727 Center Lane, Santa Paula CA 93060 (805) 933-1429
Founder and sole proprietor of ZZ Technology since 1998, Larry Crossley specializing in hydraulic transient
modeling, surge control equipment design, fabrication and field testing in municipal and industrial pipeline
applications. Customer base includes such firms as Black & Veatch, Brown & Caldwell, Burns & McDonnell, Camp
Dresser & McKee, CH2M-Hill, Montgomery-Watson, Lee & Ro Inc. Larry Crossley was employed by Fluid Kinetics
Corporation from 1978 to 1998 as lead engineer for surge arrestor product line. Duties included evaluation of
pipeline systems for hydraulic transients, preparation of equipment proposals for water and wastewater
projects, equipment design, startup and field-testing to evaluate performance.
VCI Construction, Inc.

VCI Construction, Inc. 1921 West 11th, Upland CA 91786 (909) 946-0905
VCI Construction, Inc. is a full-service utility contractor. We construct and maintain both wet and dry utility
networks that are the basis of our modern society. Customers rely on us to build the networks that connect and
support businesses, residences, municipalities, government and life as we know it.
VCI was established in1993 to provide services to the underground, aerial, and wireless industries in California,
and further expanded its services in 2002 to include wet utilities. VCI was recently acquired by Dycom Industries
Inc., a leading provider of specialized contracting services with annualized revenues of more than $3 billion
dollars.
VCI has installed and maintained millions of miles of conduit to deliver outside plant telecom services, power,
water, sewer, recycled water, and storm drain. The company has thorough knowledge of the utility industry
requirements and specifications and has spent years obtaining valuable industry experience.
Scope of Services
Page | 50
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Responsive - High Quality Work - On Time - On Budget - Enjoyable. These qualities are what we at Water
Works Engineers work every day to provide for our EVMWDs and how we want our EVMWD’s staff to describe
us during and after the execution of the project. Working to achieve these qualities informs all of our decisions
and drives our project performance at every level. Our Project Managers have a proven track record of
delivering high quality, on-time, on budget projects that have resulted in low- or no- change order construction
projects which have been completed on-time and functioned as intended. Water Works Engineers Project
Managers pride themselves in being responsive and responsible for all aspects of the projects in which they are
involved. They are not only aware and responsible for project management tasks and functions, but are
involved and integrated into the design decision making process at all levels with all disciplines.
Water Works Engineers Project Managers take the role of being in Responsible Charge of an engineering project
very seriously and work closely with all project team members to make certain the project is high quality, well-
coordinated, planned and detailed. Our Project Managers provide true single-point responsibility and contact for
our EVMWD’s to work with for all project issues. There are several Project Management Tools that we think are
significant to our success in delivering high quality projects that meet budget and schedule requirements, even
when those requirements fluctuate.
Project Management Tool #1 – Preliminary Design Report

Paying special attention to Preliminary Design is perhaps one of the most effective Project Management tools
available, having enormous impact on both project quality and project budgetary performance (both in design
cost and overall project cost). At Water Works Engineers, we place tremendous importance on the Preliminary
Design Report. The Preliminary Design Report (PDR) establishes a detailed definition of the project and refines
the established schedule and budget.
The Preliminary Design Report is the roadmap for all subsequent design decisions on a project. It will be used by
all of the project design team members (electrical, structural, civil, CADD technicians, etc.) in the development
of the detailed design. We often refer to “aiming the cannon” when we talk about Preliminary Design Report
development. This is the most critical time to dig deep into each design issue and come to a decision on how all
of the details of the facility will be designed. Changes at the Preliminary Design Report level are far easier to
manage than changes late in the design process, both from a cost and quality standpoint. The Preliminary
Design Report is generally developed by a small team of engineers (the Project Manager and Project Engineer)
The Preliminary Design Report gives us the opportunity to efficiently and effectively review each design detail
with our EVMWD at the Preliminary Design Workshop. The PDR Workshop is a point in the project which is early
enough that changes can be accommodated without impacting project design budget. This opportunity for our
EVMWD to have a real impact on project direction and feel free to do so without getting significant resistance
plays an enormous role in project success.
Project Management Tool #2 – Quality Control and Technical Review

Continuous Quality Control and Technical Review is a key tool in Water Works Engineers project management
philosophy. Quality, budget and schedule performance are all optimized when technical issues are identified and
resolved as early as possible in the project delivery process. In order for Quality Control and Technical Review to
Scope of Services
Page | 51
be effective, they have to be integrated into project delivery in a way that is well coordinated and does not
negatively impact project delivery. We achieve this optimal performance by engaging our Technical Review and
Quality Control team at the following milestones.
• Project Team Internal Kick-off Meeting. At this time, the scope is reviewed with the Preliminary Design
Team (generally the Project Manager and Project Engineer), the Principal-in-Charge, and the Technical Review
Committee. During the scope review, the Principal-in-Charge and Technical Review Committee have a first
opportunity to provide design insight, relay past company and personal experience, convey EVMWD-specific
considerations, and help focus analyses, prior to the Preliminary Design Team beginning development of the
Preliminary Design Report. During Preliminary Design, the Preliminary Design Team checks back with the
Technical Review Committee and Principal-in-Charge during critical analyses and sticking points.
• Preliminary Design Report Review. In conjunction with EVMWD review of the Preliminary Design
Report, the Preliminary Design Report is reviewed with the Technical Review Committee in an internal workshop
setting. At this time, the Technical Review Committee can assess where issues brought up in the Internal Kick-off
Meeting have been addressed, and point out areas where there may be specific design considerations to be
noted. At the internal workshop, the Preliminary Design Team reviews the Preliminary Design Report with the
Technical Review Committee as well as the remainder of the project design team (Structural Engineer, Electrical
Engineer, Staff Engineer (as appropriate), CADD Designers, etc.). In this way, all of the design concepts in the
Preliminary Design Report are efficiently finalized and communicated team-wide so that final design proceeds in
an organized and coordinated manner.
• Quality Control Reviews. At the subsequent deliverables (60%, 90% and Final), either the Principal-in-
Charge or one of the members of the Technical Review Committee performs detailed Quality Control reviews.
These reviews are the traditional step-by-step reviews of all of the design details and coordination. The detailed
design is checked for consistency with the Preliminary Design Report, as well as checked for interdisciplinary,
inter-drawing and plans-to-specs coordination. At the same time, an assessment is made of constructability,
operability and maintainability issues. The reviews follow a continually developed checklist that is updated on
every project review and disseminated throughout Water Works Engineers periodically so that everyone knows
what will be checked and self-regulates most issues.
Project Management Tool #3 – Project Schedule

A preliminary project schedule is presented below, designed to provide the project in the timeframes envisioned
by the EVMWD in the RFP. The schedule will be maintained and updated on the basis of project demands,
funding procurement, permitting status and other EVMWD requirements, and an updated schedule
communicated to the EVMWD’s project manager periodically during project execution.
Project Management Tool #4 – Monthly Metrics Assessment

COST CONTROL
Cost control starts with a detailed Scope of Work. The Scope at multiple levels will be developed for each key
task and will be used to manage the overall schedule and budget. The Scope of Work is the framework for all
project tasks and provides data for subsequent productivity, budget analysis, and team accountability. Defined
elements of work and associated budgets are provided to the team who will be responsible for delivering the
defined scope within the negotiated budget. Monthly check-ins on budget performance provide feedback on
Scope of Services
Page | 52
project performance and allow for a change of approach, if necessary, in order to continue to meet budget
requirements.
SCHEDULE CONTROL
As the project progresses, the project schedule is reviewed and updated monthly in order to reflect current
project performance. Schedule performance is reviewed at each project meeting and communicated to the
EVMWD’s Project Manager as needed. When everyone has the same understanding and expectation regarding
schedule status, and communication is clear and thorough, project delivery will meet EVMWD expectations and
lead to overall project success.
CHANGE MANAGEMENT
Change is an inevitable part of projects. Therefore, change management is an essential part of project
management. Planning for change by developing appropriate guidelines and processes is crucial to successful
project execution. Projects do not fail because of change but because of a lack of clear, consistent direction and
leadership when confronted with the challenges of change. As changes appear during project execution, Water
Works Engineers Project Manager will work to accomplish the following in as expeditious a manner as possible.
• Identify the change

• Analyze the effects of change
• Develop a response strategy
• Communicate the strategy and gain endorsement for the change
• Revise the work plan and monitor the effects of change.
We work hard to absorb project changes into existing project budgets, modifying approach and staffing to
accommodate the inevitable fluctuations in project scope. When these changes can be identified early, they
often can be managed without impact to the overall project budget. Again, the significant effort put into
Preliminary Design is an effective tool in exposing potential changes early and accommodating them with as
little impact to project cost and schedule as possible. Later changes or more substantial changes are handled by
working to fairly identify the cost of the additional work requested and agreeing to scope and fee prior to
proceeding so that everyone shares expectations.
Scope of Services
Page | 53
Ebbetts Pass Water System
Reach 3a Pipeline Replacement
Calaveras County Water District
San Andreas, CA
Project Type Water Works provided preliminary design, design and construction phase assistance
for the replacement of 18,000 LF of potable water transmission main for the
Water Pipeline
Calaveras County Water District Ebbetts Pass Water System in Arnold, CA. The project
included replacement of 10"-12" cement lined and coated steel pipe with 12" DIP.
Project Timeframe The alignment had an elevation change of over 500', resulting in operating pressures
Design: 2014 over 275 PSI for a majority of the alignment. Work included environmental,
Construction: 2015 geotechnical, hydraulic modeling, route study, right-of-way, permitting, easements,
pressure reducing station mechanical design and miscellaneous appurtenances.
Project Construction Cost
$4 million The existing system consists of a distribution system divided into 65 pressure zones,
17 storage tanks, 10 pumping stations, and over 100 pressure reducing stations.
Complicated operating conditions are due to wide range of elevations throughout the
Team Members system resulting in pressures ranging from over 200 psi to near 20 psi.
Mike Fisher, Project Manager
Sami Kader, QAQC / PIC The key design objectives were:
Kristina Alacon, Project Engineer  Design for future growth and pressure zone variation operating strategies;
Jigar Shah, Project Engineer
Perry Webster, Designer/AutoCAD  Utilize existing 2005 hydraulic model and/or current and future average and peak
demand to evaluate sizing and pressures;
Project References  Evaluate alternative alignments to mitigate wetland constraints along current
Jim Crowley alignment between the golf course & Arnold town area.
Calaveras County Water District
916.204.6011  Identify additional easement requirements for alternative alignments and begin
process of procurement immediately to support construction.
 Utilize existing design survey and assist with identifying and coordinating
modifications of survey limits to cover potential alternative alignments;
 Research and coordinate with other utility providers to avoid and/or mitigate
conflicts (with particular emphasis on potential AT&T fiber optics in the area)
The improvements were:
• 18,350-lf 12” new pipe sized for future growth and operational strategies;
• 150-LF 24”-diamter auger bore and jack crossing of Caltrans State Highway 4;
• New pressure reducing facilities with flow metering ;
• New distribution piping to reconnect existing service areas.
Trenchless Technology – Bore and Jack Crossing of Highway 4
Route Study &

Hydraulic Modeling
McKean Road Reservoir and Pipeline
Design Project
San Jose Water Company
San Jose, CA
Project Type Water Works Engineers provided civil, mechanical, and structural preliminary and
Potable Water Conveyance final design services; as well as City of San Jose and Santa Clara County
Water Storage conditional use and encroachment permitting; environmental permitting,
mitigation and habitat conservation plan adherence; geotechnical analysis;
Project Timeframe surveying; and electrical design for:
Feb 2013 – Sept 2015  a 1‐MG welded steel tank to address an existing zone storage deficiency;
 planning for a second 1‐MG steel tank to meet future growth demand;
Construction Cost  a 3,300‐lf, 16” DIP to connect to the existing distribution system; and
Tank and Pipe $5,000,000 estimate  planning for 12,000‐lf of 16” DIP to connect future supply facilities.
Design fee $394,000
The project consisted of the design of a 1MG welded steel potable water storage
Team Members tank within San Jose Water Company’s (SJWC) Cheim service zone and 3,300‐lf of
Mike Fisher, Project Manager 16” ductile iron pipeline to connect to the existing distribution system. The new
Jeremy Kellogg, Structural Engineer tank was necessary to meet current SJWC design criteria for minimum system
Cindy Bertsch, Staff Engineer storage, including CDPH minimum daily requirements and fire flow demands.
Craig Worrall, Lead Designer The tank site was situated on property in the San Vicente Ranch area within the
Tom Frisch, Electrical Engineer City of San Jose. The property was a gently to moderately sloping parcel located
Jim Bianchin, Geotechnical Engineer within fallow grounds currently used for livestock grazing, but will be part of a
Sami Kader, QA/QC
County Park in the future so site development had to take this into account.

The pipeline alignment extends north‐northwest from the tank site for ~3,500‐lf
Project References along an existing SJWC easement, which is on property that is in unincorporated
Ed Lambing
Santa Clara County, not the City of San Jose. Key design issues included
Director of Engineering
San Jose Water Company
jurisdiction coordination; site slope stability; naturally occurring asbestos;
(408) 279‐7876 multiple elevated and trenchless crossings of the Santa Clara Valley Water
District’s (SCVWD) Almaden Calero Canal and Alamitos Creek; and compliance
with Habitat Conservation Plan (defining requirements
from the County, San Jose, Morgan Hill, Gilroy, SCVWD
and Valley Transportation Authority).

In addition to the tank & pipeline, future upgrades to the
pipe network & pumping stations within the pressure
zone were identified to serve future growth. These
upgrades were researched, understood, and analyzed at
a planning level during preliminary design to ensure
near‐term designs could accommodate future needs.
Pre-Engineered Vehicular Rated Elevated Pipe Bridge
Crossing of Almaden Calero Canal
Habitat Conservation Plan set mitigation requirements for

special status species, habitat and wetland along the alignment
Wet Infrastructure Replacement Program
and On-Call Engineering Services
City of Folsom
Folsom, CA
Water Works Engineers was selected by the City of Folsom to provide On-Call
Project Type
Engineering Design Services for their Water and Wastewater Infrastructure.
Wastewater Collections
Water Distribution/Treatment Current services included design for the rehabilitation of the City’s Water
Treatment Plant Pond #1 Sludge Drying Bed. Water Works is also providing
Project Timeframe design assistance for the City’s Water Meter Implementation Program.
R&R Design: Dec 2007 – May 2009
Construction: Aug 2008 – Dec 2010 Under previous on-call services agreement, key members of the WWE
On-Call Services: 2011- Current
engineering team completed alternatives assessment; environmental constraints
Engineering Fee analysis and permitting; geotechnical data review; survey; utilities coordination;
R&R Design: $300K construction methodology selection (traditional vs. trenchless); encroachment
Pond #1 Rehab Design & CM: $19K permitting; public outreach; design and construction management for over
Construction Cost 15,000-lf of water and wastewater mainlines at 10 locations throughout the City
R&R Engineer’s Estimate: $3.2M of Folsom ranging in size from 6” to 18” pipe, including manholes, cleanouts,
R&R Bid Results (Low): $3.4M sewer laterals, water services and meters, back-flow preventers, fire hydrants,
Pond #1 Estimate: $115K
and water quality sampling stations. Extensive pot-holing; right-of-way
Team Members research/acquisition; alternative routing analysis; and construction sequencing
Mike Fisher, Project Manager requirements in specifications were required to avoid extremely congested
Eric Nielsen, Project Engineer roadways; allow for future development; and minimize impacts on an 1850’s
Joe Ziemann, Engineer
Jigar Shah, Sr. Project Engineer church and cemetery in City’s Historic District.
Jeremy Kellogg, Structural
To address unique issues associated with rehabilitation of older VCP that was
Dave Silveira, Senior Designer
Sami Kader, Constructability/CM nearing the end of its useful life, the team developed construction phase
assessment protocol for identifying and additional pipe segments that were
Project References deficient and in need of repair. These pipe segments were typically laterals and
Vaughn Fleischbein
50 Natoma Street main lines in close proximity for lines identified for repair, but were not included
Folsom, CA 95630 in the original design because exact condition could not be verified due to limited
(916) 351-3415 access. The specifications included a defined process for adding these lines to the
project at a pre-negotiated cost from the Contractor, mitigating the time and cost
of change in condition and change order negotiations.
Dominguez Well 275-01 and 294-01
Treatment Project
California Water Service Company
Carson and Long Beach, CA
The California Water Service Company (CWSC) owns and operates Dominguez
Project Type Wells 275-01 and 294-01, located in Carson and Long Beach, CA, respectively.
Groundwater Treatment Well 275-01 and 294-01 consist of a well pump (Well 275-01: 800 gpm; Well 294-
01: 1,200 gpm), a sodium hypochlorite feed system and ammonia feed system for
chloramine disinfection. CWSC used Well 275-01 and 294-01 to provide potable
Project Timeframe water to customers prior to shutdown of the wells due to exceedance of the
Study: April 2010 – June 2011 SMCL for color of 15 PCUs. Water Works Engineers was contracted to bring Well
Design: August 2011 – April 2012 275-01 and 294-01 back into operation while meeting the CWSC’s water quality
Construction: 2012-2013 goals including, color, odor, sulfide and methane removal from the groundwater
and the reduction of total trihalomethanes in the finished water.
Project Construction Cost Coupled with field and laboratory sampling to provide a robust water quality data
Preliminary: $3.6M (Well 275-01) set, treatability studies were performed on four treatment alternatives including,
$2.9M (Well 294-01) (1) carbon adsorption, (2) coagulation/filtration, (3) ion exchange and (4)
nanofiltration. The preliminary design of each of the treatment process
alternatives was performed and the cost and non-cost parameters of each were
Team Members compared. Treatment Alternative 3, which includes air stripping, ion exchange
Sami Kader, Project Manager and chloramination was recommended by WWE and chosen by the CWSC to
Andrew Borgic, Project Engineer implement at each well site.
The Dominguez Well 275-01 and 294-01 improvements include:

• New well pump (Well 294-01)
Project References
Well 275-01: • Automatic self-cleaning filter
Elizabeth Laskowska, PE • Two (2) new air strippers and an associated GAC gas scrubber
Engineer • Two (2) new VFD driven booster pumps
California Water Service Company • Ion exchange system
(310)257-1486 • Sodium hypochlorite feed system (Well 275-01)
• Aqueous ammonia feed system (Well 275-01)
Well 294-01:
• Waste Equalization Tank (40,000 gallon; Well 294-01)
John Collazo, PE
Engineer • Emergency Backup Generator
California Water Service Company
(310)257-1483
Bear Canyon 0 Pump Station
Northern California Power Agency and Lake County
Sanitation District
Middletown, CA
Project Type The Southeast Geysers Effluent Pipeline (SEGEP) conveys a mixture of effluent
Pump Station and Clear Lake water from the Southeast Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant
(WWTP) Effluent Reservoir to the Geysers Geothermal Steam Field. The effluent
Project Timeframe and lake water mixture is injected into the geothermal reservoir rock to augment
Design: 2008 steam and power production at the Geysers. The 28-mile long, 20-inch diameter
Construction: 2008- 2009 pipeline is owned by the Northern California Power Agency (NCPA) and operated
in conjunction with the Lake County Sanitation District (LACOSAN).
Team Members
Sami Kader, Principal in Charge The SEGEP system originally comprised two pump stations feeding the pipeline as
Tim Durbin, Project Engineer well as three booster pump stations (Bear Canyon 1, Bear Canyon 2, and Bear
Jim Geselbracht, QA/QC Canyon 3); a fourth booster pump station was added later. Deterioration in
Craig Worrall, Lead Designer pipeline performance was observed as the SEGEP capacity decreased from 6400
gpm to less than 6000 gpm at certain times of the year. This decrease in capacity
Construction Team: was linked to increasing pressure losses across the pipeline, possibly due to
Terracon Piplelines, Inc. deterioration of the pipe wall or build-up of mineral or biological deposits on the
Ukiah Electric interior pipe wall. In addition, increased headloss in the pipeline caused suction
pressures to fall below the NPSH requirements of the pumps at Bear Canyon 1.
Project References
Steve Enedy – NCPA In 2006, Water Works Engineers designed a chemical feed facility that was
(707) 809-6000 constructed at the Southeast Pump Station in an attempt to control biogrowth on
Mark Dellinger – LACOSAN
the pipe wall by chemical addition. While that project was under construction,
(707) 263-0119
NCPA and LACOSAN teamed to solicit designs for a new booster pump station
(Bear Canyon 0) to be built at the Middletown WWTP that would provide the
pressure boost necessary to resolve the NPSH issues at Bear Canyon 1 and
increase pipeline capacity to 6800 gpm.
Water Works Engineers modeled the hydraulic performance of the SEGEP system
and used this model as the basis of the design for the Bear Canyon 0 booster
pump station. Water Works Engineers wrote specifications for the pre-purchase
of a packaged booster pump station from ITT Flowtronex that included a 350-hp
Water Works provided construction horizontal split case centrifugal pump; pre-fabricated building; variable frequency
oversight, as well as design, for the drive; electrical switchgear; piping; flow control valves; and HVAC unit. In
Bear Canyon 0 facility. addition to the packaged pump station, the Bear Canyon
0 facility is comprised of a 20-inch station bypass line and
check valve, a pressure relief pipeline, and flow control
gate valves.
Water Works Engineers prepared construction

documents and provided coordination with TerraCon
Pipelines, Inc., RF MacDonald Co., and Ukiah Electric
during the construction phase. Water Works Engineers
provided field inspection, submittal reviews, and startup
services during construction and coordinated the
construction to minimize the amount of time that the
pipeline was out of service.
,
Upper Antelope Creek - East Trunk Sewer
South Placer Municipal Utility District
Loomis, CA
Project Type Water Works Engineers was selected by the South Placed Municipal Utility District
Sewer Trunk Line (SMPUD) to complete feasibility assessment, planning, environmental permitting,
survey, geotechnical analysis, and design Upper Antelope Creek - East Trunk
Project Timeframe Sewer Project - approximately 8,000-LF of 8” FPVC (DR 25) or 12” HDPE (DR 11)
Design: Oct 2011 - Present truck sewer; and decommissioning of the Munoz Pump Station.
Engineering Fee The Munoz Pump Station was constructed as part of the Penryn Wastewater
Preliminary: $47,000 Collection System in 1989. The installation of Moyno Progressive Cavity Pumps
Final: $143,000 (the only ones the District operates) as the high-head pump of choice for the
SDCs: $24,000 station resulted in operation and maintenance problems for the District. The
elimination of a lift station and replacement with gravity system resulted in more
Cost
Engineer’s Estimate: $1.8 M
effective and efficient sewer operations.
Our team analyzed the feasibility of the project based on how right-of-way,
Team Members property encumbrance, shoring/excavation, rock removal, environmental
Mike Fisher, Project Manager
permitting, groundwater and contamination, traffic flow, existing utilities, current
Jigar Shah, Project Engineer
Eric Nielsen, Condition Assessment
and future development, and public safety would affect constructability and cost
Craig Worrall, Sr. Designer of the project. Based on our feasibility analysis, the District elected to move
Mark Steel, Designer forward with detailed design to construct the gravity line and decommission the
Perry Webster, Designer pump station. Estimates indicated the project will pay for itself in reduced O&M
Jeremy Kellogg, Structural and elimination of Pump Station Rehabilitation costs in just over 5 years.
Sami Kader, QA/QC & PIC
Design included tradition and trenchless construction specifications; detailed 3-
Project References dimensional CAD drawings of new and existing utilities; private easement
Sam Rose procurement, traffic control plans; and alternate pipe materials technical
5807 Springview Drive specifications. The key issues along the alignment were rock removal, avoidance
Rocklin, CA 95677 of jurisdictional water ways and old growth oak trees, and existing utilities.
(916) 786-8522
Significant Construction Constrains Identified and Mitigated
Existing 30”/42”
PCWA Water Lines Multiple
drainage
crossings
Existing
utilities
Significant Rock
along Alignment
We
Acceptability of District Professional Services Agreement
We have reviewed the District’s Professional Services Agreement and take no exceptions.
________________________________
Sami Kader
Principal, Water Works Engineers
Date: 10/23/2014
Scope of Services
Page | 62
ANDREW J. BORGIC, P.E.
Civil/Sanitary Engineer
Mr. Borgic is a water/wastewater process design engineer with over eight years of
experience in large and small civil water and wastewater treatment projects, including
feasibility studies, alternatives analyses, and design for treatment plant upgrades and
modifications. His design experience includes preliminary design reports and
preparation of final plans and specifications for water and wastewater treatment
plant or pump station projects. Typical duties include technical report preparation,
Project Role preparation of contract drawings and specifications, cost estimate preparation, client
Project Engineer interaction, contractor interaction, field visits, inspections, and engineering services
during construction.
Years of
Experience Representative Project Experience
8
Water Treatment Projects
Education Supai Village Groundwater Treatment Facility – Havasupai Indian Reservation, AZ
M.S. - (Design) The local water supply is provided by four wells ranging in capacity from 60-
Civil/Environmental 200 gpm. Two of the wells currently exceed the arsenic standard with concentrations
Engineering, up to 12 µg/L, just above the 10 µg/L, MCL. Mr. Borgic was the Project Engineer that
University of designed a multi-vessel adsorption system, blending facilities and a sodium
California at Davis, hypochlorite feed system housed in a new CMU block building. The design was
(2007) tailored to address the remote nature of the site where access is limited to walking,
mule or helicopter access.
B.S. - Civil
Engineering, California Water Service Company Dominguez Treatment Facilities Project – Carson
California State and Long Beach, CA (Study/Design/Construction Management) Mr. Borgic provided
University at Chico preliminary engineering analysis and design to bring Well 275-01 and 294-01 back
(2004) into operation while meeting CWSC’s water quality goals including color, odor, sulfide
and methane removal from the groundwater and the reduction of total
B.S. – Mechanical trihalomethanes in the finished water. Mr. Borgic performed a cost/performance
Engineering, analysis for a range of treatment options that would meet or exceed their project
California State goals. The facility improvements design are underway at Well 275-01 (800 gpm) and
University at Chico 294-01 (1,200 gpm) utilizing the following process train: automatic backwash filters,
(2004) air stripping, gas scrubbers, booster pumps, ion exchange and disinfection through
chloramination (sodium) hypochlorite and ammonium hydroxide. Mr. Borgic is
Registration currently providing construction administration on the project.
Professional
Engineer (Civil): California Water Service Company Lucerne WTP - Lucerne, CA (Design, Construction
California C073792 Support) Mr. Borgic was the Associate Engineer providing construction support on the
upgrade and expansion of 1.0 mgd facility consisting of clarification, automatic self-
cleaning pre-filters, microfiltration, advanced oxidation (sodium hypochlorite and
Credentials
hydrogen peroxide), and UV disinfection
Certified QSP
City of Scottsdale Water Campus Advanced Water Treatment Expansion Project -
Memberships Scottsdale, AZ (Design) Mr. Borgic was the Staff Engineer on the design of the
APWA Expansion from 14 to 24-mgd ADWF. Expansion of the MF, RO, and post RO
treatment facilities. Addition of 20-mgd UV/advanced oxidation process for the
removal of N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) as well as other emerging contaminants.
Page 2 of 3
Trinity Center Mutual Water Company WTP Upgrade - Trinity Center, CA (Design/CM) Mr. Borgic provided
preliminary design on this project which consisted of. a new 300 gpm WTP to replace the non-functional
sand filter with direct pressure filters in metal building, new gaseous chlorine feed system, backwash
recovery system, controls, emergency generator, and 429 kgal welded steel water storage tank. Strategic
phasing of equipment demolition and installation was critical to keep the facility operational during
construction. Also included installing approximately 250 radio-read water meters to encourage
conservation. Prepared permit applications to Trinity County (Special Use Permit) and monthly
reimbursement claims to the State. Funding source was combination of SRF (grant and loan) and Proposition
50 (grant) through CDPH.
Spring Valley WTP Upgrade and Clearwell Tank Project, Ruzicka Associates – Spring Valley, CA (Design) Mr.
Borgic was the Project Engineer on the upgrade and expansion of the 280 gpm surface water treatment
plant consisting of raw water well pumps, slow sand filters, chlorine contact chamber, two clearwells and a
booster pump station. Improvements were made to the WTP’s reliability, water quality and water quality
monitoring and reporting capabilities. Ongoing coordination with the local CDPH office was key to the
project success.
Lake County Sanitation District Soda Bay WTP Improvements Facilities Plan – Lakeport, CA (Plan) Mr.
Borgic created a Facilities Plan to compile list of needed improvements. It includes rehabilitation of an
existing Intake Pump Station, a new pretreatment facility, replacement and rehabilitation of an existing
ozone system, and rehabilitation of the Finished Water Pump Station and Clearwell.
Water Distribution Infrastructure

Trinity Center Mutual Water Company WTF - Trinity Center, CA (Design) Mr. Borgic provided preliminary
and of this project that consisted of a new 300 gpm WTP to replace the non-functional sand filter with
direct pressure filters in metal building, new gaseous chlorine feed system, backwash recovery system,
controls, emergency generator, and 429 kgal welded steel water storage tank. Strategic phasing of
equipment demolition and installation was critical to keep the facility operational during construction. Also
included installing approximately 250 radio-read water meters to encourage conservation.
Lake County Sanitation District Spring Valley WTP CW2 Inspection - Lakeport, CA (Inspection) Inspection
of a 375,000 gallon FBE bolted steel tank lining and coating inspection, inspection of the upper portion (roof,
roof supports and sidewalks above the HWL) of the tank only. Inspection includes DFT measurement and
recording, general conformance to specs/submittal and associated Field Report
Wastewater Treatment Projects

City of Riverside Water Quality Control Plant Phase 1 Expansion – Riverside, CA As a sub to PCL
Constructors, WWE provided a design submittal with a solution to repair the existing digested sludge
storage tank gas leakage Provide a structural review of the existing clarifier walls, floor of the effluent
channels, and footings to determine if adequate strength is provided to support the submitted clarifier cover
system reactions.
City of Redding Stillwater Wastewater Treatment Plant Phase 1A/1B Expansion Project - Redding, CA
(Design/Construction Management ) The existing plant has Average Dry Weather Flow (ADWF) capacity of
2.6 mgd and a Peak Hour Flow (PHF) capacity of 13.5 mgd. The plant is currently limited by the 9 mgd filter
capacity. Mr. Borgic provided design and construction management of the expansion from 13.5 to 17.0-
mgd PHF. Expansion of the headworks and addition of two 80-foot diameter secondary clarifiers and
associated scum and RAS/WAS pump stations. Also addition of two traveling bridge filters. Conversion of the
existing 6.2 MG emergency storage ponds to lined secondary effluent equalization basins.
Page 3 of 3
City of Redding Stillwater Wastewater Treatment Plant Phase 1C Expansion Project Redding, CA (Design)
Mr. Borgic was the Project Engineer on the design of the hydraulic modeling for a future WAS transfer
pump station. He was also part of the WaterWorks team for the design of the future WAS holding tank and
jet mixing system. Mr. Borgic made the selection of progressing cavity pumps, mixing pump, and jet header
and nozzles. Analysis of potential modes of operation for WAS transfer and the impacts on plant operations
and prepared construction specifications for the facility.
Wastewater Collection Infrastructure

City of Shasta Lake, Pump Station Improvements, Shasta Lake, CA (Design/Construction Management)
Mr. Borgic was the Project Engineer of the preliminary engineering analysis and design report, detailed
design, and bid/construction phase services for duplex 25-HP 1,500 GPM submersible pump station,
decommissioning of existing station, and roof replacements for three other lift stations. Project included
considerable re-use of existing facilities to minimize capital investment and accelerated schedule to take
advantage of favorable bid environment.
City of Redding Sunset Drive Lift Station - Redding, CA (Study) As Staff Engineer, Mr. Borgic provided
detailed descriptions and figures depicting the site layouts for a new 2,800 gpm lift station, along with
design criteria, pump selection, wetwell configuration alternatives, comparison of site alternatives for the
station, cost differences between the various configuration and site alternatives, and the recommended
design for the overall project.
Redding Rancheria Win River Casino Lift Station Replacement - Redding, CA (Design, Construction
Management) As Staff Engineer, Mr. Borgic was part of the WaterWorks team the designed the
replacement of existing 500-gpm submersible pump station with a new pump station in a new location.
Included odor scrubbing equipment to remove station odors as the new location was adjacent to a public
gathering/tribal ceremony area.
SAMI KADER, P.E.
Civil/Sanitary Engineer
Mr. Kader is a civil/sanitary design and construction engineer with nineteen years of
experience in water, wastewater, and conveyance projects. He has worked as a
project manager, design manager and project engineer for large and small design
projects as well as a resident engineer for large and small construction projects. His
extensive construction administration experience provides him with a real world
practical knowledge of the application of design documents and details during
Project Role construction and provides insight in the creation of constructible, practical designs
Principal in Charge which accomplish the intended engineering function with efficiency in both
construction and operation. Sami’s construction administration experience also
Years of provides him with a background in claims avoidance and assists in creating plans and
specifications which will minimize confusion and claims (and therefore controlling
Experience overall project costs) during bidding and construction.
19
Education Representative Project Experience

M.S. -
Civil/Environmental Water Projects
Engineering, Cachuma Operation and Maintenance Board, Lake Cachuma Emergency Pump
University of Station, Santa Barbara, CA (Design/Build) Drought conditions have caused Lake
Washington, Cachuma, which supplies water for the communities of Santa Barbara, Goleta,
(1995) Montecito, Carpenteria and the Santa Ynez Valley, to drop to historically low levels.
Mr. Kader managed the design of an emergency 45-mgd floating pump station and
B.S. - Civil 3500-ft of HDPE pipeline to convey water from the lower section of the lake to the
Engineering, intake tower.
University of
California at Davis California Water Service Company, Dominguez Treatment Facilities Project – Carson
(1993 - with Honors) and Long Beach, CA (Study/Design) Mr. Kader managed the preliminary engineering
analysis and design to bring Well 275-01 and 294-01 back into operation while
meeting CWSC’S water quality goals including color, odor, sulfide and methane
Registration
removal from the groundwater and the reduction of total trihalomethanes in the
Professional Engineer
finished water. Performed a cost/performance analysis for a range of treatment
(Civil):
options that would meet or exceed their project goals. The facility improvements
California C056653
design is currently underway at Well 275-01 (800 gpm) and 294-01 (1,200 gpm)
Arizona 35250
utilizing the following process train: automatic backwash filters, air stripping, gas
Hawaii 14034
scrubbers, booster pumps, ion exchange and disinfection through chloramination
Nevada 17061
(sodium hypochlorite and ammonium hydroxide)
New Mexico 20375
California Water Service Company, Dominguez Treatment Facilities Project – Carson
Memberships and Long Beach, CA (CM) Mr. Kader managed the preliminary engineering analysis
AWWA and design to bring Well 275-01 and 294-01 back into operation while meeting
CWEA CWSC’S water quality goals including color, odor, sulfide and methane removal from
the groundwater and the reduction of total trihalomethanes in the finished water.
Performed a cost/performance analysis for a range of treatment options that would
meet or exceed their project goals. The facility improvements design is currently
underway at Well 275-01 (800 gpm) and 294-01 (1,200 gpm) utilizing the following
process train: automatic backwash filters, air stripping, gas scrubbers, booster pumps,
ion exchange and disinfection through chloramination (sodium hypochlorite and
ammonium hydroxide)
SAMI KADER, P.E.
Page 2 of 5
California Water Service Company, Hawthorne WTP - Hawthorne, CA, (Design) The Hawthorne WTP treats
groundwater to water quality standards. Mr. Kader managed the design/ build project to improve and to
restart the existing WTP. The contaminants of concern included color, methane, TOC/DOC, ammonia, iron,
and manganese. The project design and construction schedule was accelerated and was completed in
approximately 16 weeks.
California Water Service Company, Crystal Springs Reservoir – Hillsborough, CA (Study) The existing Crystal
Springs Reservoir is planned to be demolished. Mr. Kader was the Principal in Charge of this study for a new
partially buried 2.4 million gallon concrete reservoir that would be constructed in the same footprint of the
existing reservoir. Water Works Engineers was engaged to prepare a pre-design report with drawings for the
concrete tank. The structural requirements of the tank were also analyzed.
California Water Service Company, Northwest Bakersfield WTP – Bakersfield, CA, (Study) The Northwest
Bakersfield Water Treatment Plant (NWBWTP) is an 8-mgd direct filtration plant which uses in-pipe
coagulation (dosing polyaluminum chloride in the intake pipeline) and Pall Microza membrane
microfiltration to treat raw surface water for drinking water. Mr. Kader oversaw this study to examine
possible alternatives to increase the reliable plant operating capacity back to the original design of 8-mgd.
Alternatives being analyzed include adding pretreatment such as clarification, pre-oxidation, or enhanced
coagulation, adding additional membrane capacity, or modifying the backwash treatment system.
California Water Service Company, Chromium 6 Study, (Study) Mr. Kader oversaw this study that
developed a comparison of viable treatment technologies and associated costs to meet the potential
California Department of Public Health Maximum Contaminant Levels for Chromium 6.
San Jose Water Company Vickery Avenue Reservoir Replacement Project, Saratoga, CA (Design/CPS) Mr.
Kader is the Principal in Charge and QA/QC for the preliminary design alternatives analysis; life-cycle cost
comparison of alternate tank materials, planning, design, plans and specifications, bidding assistance, and
construction phase services for replacement of existing earthen dam reservoir with two new pre-stressed
concrete tanks, including:
 2 MG partially buried AWWA D110 Type I prestressed concrete tank.
 5.8 MG partially buried AWWA D110 Type I prestressed concrete tank.
 Booster Pump Station– 2,400 GPM, Vertical Turbine Pumps, Back-up power, chemical feed.
 Site design to minimize material off-haul and eliminate landslide potential
 Phased construction while maintaining 2MG operational volume of existing reservoir.
San Jose Water Company McKean Road Reservoir & Pipeline Design - - Saratoga, CA (Design) Mr. Kader
provided QA/QC for the preliminary and final civil, mechanical, and structural design; environmental
permitting; geotechnical analysis; surveying; and electrical design for a 1-MG steel tank to alleviate existing
storage deficit; preliminary planning for a second 1-MG steel tank to meet potential future growth demand;
3,300-lf of 16” ductile iron and PVC pipeline to connect to existing system. Pipeline design included a 200-lf
pipe bridge and 70-lf vehicular bridge to cross existing waterways; pipe material selection to support
extended asset useful life in wet and corrosive environment; steep slope construction in rocky conditions;
and multi-agency environmental and construction permitting services.
SAMI KADER, P.E.
Page 3 of 5
San Jose Water Company Overlook Reservoir & Pump Station Design – San Jose, CA (Design/CM) Mr.
Kader provided QA/QC for the preliminary design alternatives analysis; life-cycle cost comparison of
alternate tank materials, planning, design, plans and specifications, bidding assistance, and construction
phase services for replacement of existing concrete reservoir with a new pre-stressed concrete tank and
booster pump station, including:
 Approximately 2 MG partially buried AWWA D110 Type I pre-stressed concrete tank.
 Booster Pump Station– dual 400 GPM @ 300’ TDH, submersible pumps and controls.
 Pre-purchased pumps and controls to support phased construction of pump station ahead of tank.
 Demolition specifications for removal of existing residential home on proposed tank site.
 Redesign of roadway and drainage to meet stringent post construction stormwater requirements.
City of Ceres Blaker Well 32 Filter Rehabilitation – Ceres, CA (Design) Mr. Kader was the Principal in charge
of the design for retrofit of existing manganese dioxide pressure filtration system for manganese arsenic
removal, with failed underdrain system. Evaluated different media options, and recommended replacing
media with Greensand due to lower cost and backwash rates. The design included a static mixer for
chemical mixing, and a new underdrain system including concrete fill, reuse of existing inlet header, and
owner-purchased nozzles (2.9 mgd).
City of Ceres Blaker Well 32 Improvements Project – Ceres, CA (Design) Mr. Kader was the Principal in
Charge of the preliminary design report to evaluate backwash recovery, solids handling, chemical feed and
various other improvements at existing groundwater treatment plant for manganese and arsenic. Mr. Kader
managed final design of recommended facilities, including new metal building for chemical storage and
feed, backwash recovery tank and pumps, chemical feed system and site improvements (2.9 mgd).
City of Shasta Lake Water Treatment Residuals Feasibility Analysis - Shasta Lake, CA (Study) Mr. Kader was
the Principal in Charge of this study that evaluated continued use of the Dewatering Ponds, which would
require a Title 27 compliant lining and leachate monitoring system, in addition to elimination of the
discharge of any dewatering liquids from the site (via land application). In addition, Water Works Engineers
is evaluating the construction of a dewatering facility on the grounds of the WTP, which would allow the City
to eliminate the operation and maintenance of the dewatering ponds on a separate site.
City of Aurora Water Treatment System Design for Iron, Manganese and Arsenic Removal Aurora, OR
(Design) Mr. Kader was the Principal in charge of QA/QC of a new 500-gpm greensand filtration system for
the removal of arsenic, iron and manganese. IT uses oxidized naturally occurring iron for the coagulation of
arsenic and subsequent filtration of arsenic with the greensand filter. Manganese is removed using
greensand adsorption onto manganese oxide.
Southern Nevada Water Authority Arsenic Removal Pilot Project - Las Vegas, NV (Study) Mr. Kader
compiled an analysis of pilot test data for the use of Granular Ferric Hydroxide (GFH), Granular Ferric Oxide
(GFO) and Activated Alumina (AA) for arsenic removal from groundwater. Up to 140,000 bed volume media
performance observed.
Arizona Water Company Arroyo Vista Water Storage Tank and Booster Pump Station, - Phoenix, AZ
(Design) Mr. Kader provided engineering planning, design and construction administration services for the
construction of a new 500,000 gallon welded steel water storage tank, a 3200-gpm capacity booster pump
station, a chlorine gas storage and feed facility and all appurtenant facilities, including flow control facilities
in the water distribution system.
SAMI KADER, P.E.
Page 4 of 5
Walker River Paiute Tribe Arsenic Removal Water Treatment Plant - Schurz, NV (Design, Construction
Management, Start-up and Operations Support) Mr. Kader managed engineering planning, design and
construction administration services for the construction of a 700-gpm coagulation/microfiltration (C/MF)
for arsenic removal. 100-ug/L arsenic in raw water. Treatment process included pre-chlorination, ferric
chloride addition, microfiltration, sodium hydroxide for pH control, post-chlorination for disinfection and
finished water pumping. Backwash treatment included lamella clarification, recycle of supernatant and
disposal of sludge to sewer ponds.
Longley Lane Water Treatment Plant - Washoe County, NV (Design, Construction Management, Start-up
and Operations support) Mr. Kader managed engineering planning, design and construction administration
service s of a 4-mgd expandable to 6-mgd microfiltration water treatment plant for meeting SWTR
regulations and providing coagulation/microfiltration for arsenic removal. Treatment process includes pH
adjustment with CO2, ferric chloride feed, microfiltration, sodium hypochlorite and sodium hydroxide feed,
chlorine contact tank, finished water pumping, backwash recovery, solids dewatering with plate and frame
filter press.
Fallon Paiute Shoshone Tribe Arsenic Removal WTP, Fallon, NV (Design, Construction Support, Start-up
and Operations Support) Mr. Kader managed the design, provided construction administration, start-up and
operations support for a 0.5-mgd WTP using coagulation/microfiltration (C/MF) for arsenic removal. 100-
ug/L arsenic in raw water. Treatment process includes pH adjustment with CO2, ferric chloride and sodium
hypochlorite addition, microfiltration, CO2 stripping, and backwash treatment consisting of lamella plate
clarification and filter-bottom roll-off container dewatering (0.5-mgd).
Indian Health Service (IHS) Ground Water Treatment Projects IHS completed contracting with Water
Works Engineers in 2009 to provide engineering services for sanitation facilities construction projects in the
Southwest United States Southwest states. IHS intends to award groundwater treatment projects, primarily
focusing on arsenic reduction, to Water Works in 2010 with annual renewals through 2015. IHS’s Western
Arizona District Office and Reno District office have projects underway with Water Works Engineers for
groundwater treatment removal projects in Battle Mountain, NV; Campbell Ranch, NV and Supai, AZ.
Scoping of the Fort McDowell Casino and Residential Area Arsenic treatment system is also underway. Mr.
Kader was the Principal in Charge of these projects overseeing their design. The Yerington Paiute Tribe, NV
was granted funds from EPA to design and construct a new water treatment plant to reduce arsenic (11-23
µg/L) and uranium ( 20-47 µg/L ) concentrations below their respective MCLs of 10 µg/L and 30 µg/L. The
WWE engineering team designed a new 200 gpm water treatment plant to remove uranium with ion
exchange and on-site resin regeneration and to remove arsenic with adsorption media. pH adjustment will
be required with CO2 to optimize arsenic removal. At Battle Mountain, NV Indian Reservation, the water
supply is comprised of two wells with a capacity of 175 gpm. Arsenic concentrations range from 20-17 µg/L.
The WWE engineering team designed a new well house building utilizing coagulation/microfiltration with
ferric chloride and a Pall Aria AP-3 Microfilter, a sodium hypochlorite disinfection system and pH adjustment
equipment.
Sierra Army Depot, Iron, Manganese and Uranium Removal Design-Build Project - Herlong, CA (Design)
Mr. Kader was the Principal in Charge of this design of one uranium removal and two green sand filter
facilities with backwash reclaim tanks for each facility, Sodium Bisulfate injection system and surface wash
booster pumps and a .5 mile long raw water pipeline from Well 9 to Well 5. A new 2,400 square-foot water
treatment building at Well 5 to treat water from both Wells 5 and 9 with greensand filters for iron and
manganese removal, backwash recovery (99% efficient) and control systems. A new 2,400 square-foot
water treatment building at Well 8 to treat water from Well 8 with greensand filters and side-stream anion
exchange (uranium removal), backwash recovery and control systems. Installation for variable frequency
drives at Well8 8 and 5 to reduce the size of the standby generators required. Retrofit of the base control
system for the water storage and distribution system with a new SCADA system.
SAMI KADER, P.E.
Page 5 of 5
Technical Papers
“Regionalization of Biosolids Treatment and Dewatering for the City of Redding”, CWEA Northern Regional
Training Conference, September 2011
“Arsenic Removal in a Multi-Contaminant Environment, Four Case Studies, Four Treatment Alternatives”
AWWA Intermountain Section Annual Conference, September, 2011
“Uranium Removal in a Multi-Contaminant Groundwater Source” AWWA Inorganic Contaminants

Workshop, March, 2010
“Replacing Failing Infrastructure Just in Time – The Jenny Creek Sewer Line Project” CWEA Northern
Regional Training Conference, September, 2009
“Blending Considerations for Optimizing Water Quality (a non-treatment strategy for water quality
compliance” USEPA Small Drinking Water Systems Workshop, August, 2009
“Implementation of Advanced Water Treatment (MF/UV/AOP) for a rural water system on a small site with
challenging source water and limited resources” AWWA CA-NV Spring Conference, April 2009
“Replacement of an Above-Ground Sewer in an Environmentally Sensitive Area” CWEA Northern Regional

Training Conference, September 2008
“Design and Performance of C/MF for Arsenic Removal in Central Nevada” AWWA Inorganic Contaminants
Workshop, Albuquerque, NM, January 2008
“Performance of Coagulation/Microfiltration for Arsenic Removal – a Review of 21 Months of Operations”

AWWA CA-NV Fall Conference, October, 2006
“Managing the Impact of Arsenic Residuals on Wastewater Systems” California Water Environment
Association, Northern Regional Training Conference, Redding, CA, September 2005
“Operation of Coagulation/Microfiltration for Arsenic Treatment – an Update from the Fallon Paiute-
Shoshone Tribe Arsenic WTP” AWWA CA-NV Spring Conference, Industry Hills, CA, April, 2005 and APWA –
NV Spring Conference, Mesquite, NV, April, 2005
“Implementation of Coagulation/Microfiltration for Arsenic Removal-A case study at the Fallon Paiute
Shoshone Tribe Arsenic Removal WTP” AWWA Membrane Technology Conference, Phoenix, AZ, March 2005
(Poster Session)
“Coagulation/Microfiltration for Arsenic Treatment – A case study at the Fallon Paiute Shoshone Tribe
Arsenic Removal WTP” AWWA CA-NV Fall Conference, Sacramento, CA, October, 2004
MIKE FISHER, P.E.
Senior Civil Engineer
Mr. Fisher has over 18 years of experience in managing all phases of planning, design,
and construction management for new and existing wet utility infrastructure. He has
extensive experience in hydraulic analysis and condition/capacity assessments in
preparation of rehabilitation and replacement recommendations for wet utility
infrastructure. He is experienced in trenchless construction methods and is certified in
Project Role pipe-bursting and cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) best design and construction practices by
Senior Engineer/ the North American Society for Trenchless Technologies (NASTT). Mr. Fisher
Project Manager specializes in management of complex projects requiring coordination of multi-
discipline design teams. His “hands-on” approach to design, attention to details, and
Years of Experience exceptional communication skills are what make his projects successful. Mike led the
18 development of Water Works “risk” based infrastructure failure analysis protocol and
has utilized that protocol in the preparation of prioritized, time-phased, capital
Education improvement plans for numerous existing water and sewer systems.
B.S. – Civil/Env. Engineering,
California State Polytechnic Representative Project Experience
University, San Luis Obispo Calaveras County Water District Ebbetts Pass WS Reach 3A Pipeline Replacement -
Murphys, CA (Design) Mrs. Fisher was the Project Manager overseeing the
Registration preliminary design, design and construction phase assistance for replacement of
Professional Engineer (Civil): 18,000 LF of potable water transmission main for the CCWD Ebbetts Pass Water
California C67194 System in Arnold, CA. The project included replacement of 10"-12" cement lined and
coated steel pipe with 16" DIP. The alignment had an elevation change of over 500',
Credentials resulting in operating pressures over 275 PSI for a majority of the alignment. Work
included environmental, geotechnical, hydraulic modeling, route study, right-of-way,
California Water
Environment Association permitting, easements, and pressure reducing station mechanical design.
(CWEA) SSO-WDR subject
Water System Improvements Harrah’s - Rincon Valley Center, CA (Design) Mr. Fisher
matter expert
was the Project Manager on a Design-Build of 5,200-LF of 12-inch mainline piping,
650- gpm well, 200,000-gallon steel water storage tank, 700-gpm pump station, 1200-
CWEA Board of Directors,
gpm diesel driven fire pump, 20,000 gallon bolted steel tank and secondary water
Director at Large (North)
system supply piping, control strategy development and implementation with SCADA.
Author - CVCWA/BACWA
San Jose Water Company McKean Road Reservoir & Pipeline Design - - Saratoga, CA
SSO
(Design) As Project Manager, Mr. Fisher is responsible for overseeing preliminary and
Response BMP Manual
final civil, mechanical, and structural design; environmental permitting; geotechnical
Guest Lecturer – CSU SAC & analysis; surveying; and electrical design for a 1-MG steel tank to alleviate existing
storage deficit; preliminary planning for a second 1-MG steel tank to meet potential
Cal-Poly SLO on Trenchless
future growth demand; 3,300-lf of 16” ductile iron and PVC pipeline to connect to
Technologies
existing system. Pipeline design included a 200-lf pipe bridge and 70-lf vehicular
bridge to cross existing waterways; pipe material selection to support extended asset
Certified NASSCO Pipeline
useful life in wet and corrosive environment; steep slope construction in rocky
and Manhole Assessment
conditions; and multi-agency environmental and construction permitting services.
Trainer
Water Well and Groundwater Treatment Facility – Linda County Water District, CA
Certified NASTT Pipe
Bursting and CIPP Design (Design)Mr. Fisher was a project engineer on a design of a water well and
Best Practices groundwater treatment plant, included: site selection, sampling well, water quality
sampling, 3500 gpm well design, well construction management and development
support. Improvements included: well pump, pressure filter for iron and manganese
removal, aeration tower for hydrogen sulfide and methane removal, activated carbon
scrubber for aeration tower off-gas treatment, above ground storage tank, control
building, SCADA system, piping design to connect to distribution system and site civil.
MIKE FISHER, P.E.
Page 2 of 5
SJWC Overlook Reservoir & Pump Station Design - - Saratoga, CA (Design) As Project Manager, Mr. Fisher
is responsible for preliminary design alternatives analysis; life-cycle cost comparison of alternate tank
materials, planning, design, plans and specifications, bidding assistance, and construction phase services for
replacement of existing concrete reservoir with a new pre-stressed concrete tank and booster pump station,
including:
 Approximately 2 MG partially buried AWWA D110 Type I pre-stressed concrete tank.
 Booster Pump Station– dual 400 GPM @ 300’ TDH, submersible pumps and controls.
 Pre-purchased pumps and controls to support phased construction of pump station ahead of tank.
 Demolition specifications for removal of existing residential home on proposed tank site.
 Redesign of roadway and drainage to meet stringent post construction stormwater requirements.
San Jose Water Company Vickery Avenue Reservoir Replacement Project, - Saratoga, CA
(Design/Construction Phase Services) – Mr. Fisher served as Project Manager that provided tank materials,
planning, design, plans and specifications, bidding assistance, and construction phase services for
replacement of existing earthen dam reservoir with two new pre-stressed concrete tanks, including:
 2 MG partially buried AWWA D110 Type I prestressed concrete tank.
 5.8 MG partially buried AWWA D110 Type I prestressed concrete tank.
 Booster Pump Station– 2,400 GPM, Vertical Turbine Pumps, Back-up power, chemical feed.
 Phased construction while maintaining 2MG operational volume of existing reservoir.
San Jose Water Company Cavanee Booster Pump Station - Los Gatos, CA (Design/Construction Phase
Services) As the Senior Engineer, Mr. Fisher provided preliminary engineering analysis and design report,
detailed design, and bid/construction phase services for triplex 100-HP 3,500 GPM submersible pump
station. The Project included considerable re-use of existing facilitates to minimize capital investment.
City of Folsom Plan Area Zone 4 and 5 Booster Pump Station – Folsom, CA (Design) Mr. Fisher was the
Project Manager on design services for the Folsom Plan Area Zone 4 & 5 Booster Pump Station. The project
included design of a 2MGD triplex pump station for Zone 5 with provisions to increase to 4 MGD at build-out
and a 1MGD triplex pump station for Zone 4 with provisions to increase to 3 MGD at build-out. Site
improvements included MCC, SCADA and re-chlorination, as well as the to parallel pump sets all inside a
CMU building.
Redway Community Services District Water Treatment Plant Improvements - Redway, CA (Pre-
Design/Design/ Construction Phase Services) As Senior Engineer, Mr. Fisher performed the design review of
intake and booster pump station replacements, yard piping, valve replacements, and a new 450,000 gallon
water storage tank.
Nimbus Tank Rehabilitation - Folsom, CA (Design) As Project Manager, Mr. Fisher oversaw the
Rehabilitation of a 1.5-MG welded steel water tank, it included: survey, pre-design analysis, alternatives
assessment, and production of plans, specifications and cost estimate. Improvements included: complete
interior and exterior coating system removal and replacement; improved storage tank mixing via
distribution piping modifications; upgrade safety features and pipe penetration connections to be in
accordance with current AWWA D100 welded steel tank design standards; active cathodic protection
system; and piping and appurtenance seismic upgrades.
MIKE FISHER, P.E.
Page 3 of 5
Vineyards Development Water Supply Program - Brentwood, CA (Planning/Design/Construction

Management) Mr. Fisher was a QA/QFC Manager for the infrastructure assessment, planning, design, plans
and specifications, bidding assistance, and construction phase services for multiple water reservoirs and
pump station projects, including:
 Reservoir & Pump Station 2.3 – 4 MG partially buried AWWA D110 Type I prestressed concrete tank.
 Booster Pump Station 2.3 – 1,700 GPM, 3 Vertical Turbine Pumps, Back-up power, chemical feed.
 Hydro-Pneumatic Pump Station 3.3 – 3,300 GPM, 4 VT Pumps, HP Tank, Back-up power, chem. feed.
Union Hills Water Treatment Plant Security Improvements - Phoenix, AZ (Pre-Design) Mr. Fisher was a
project engineer that assisted with analysis and design of the 90-acre 160 MGD Union Hills Water Treatment
Plant integrated security improvements, including site perimeter and interior fencing, intrusion detection
and lighting; closed circuit television (CCTV) system; integrated security entrance doors with electronic card
access system; local and remote monitoring.
City of Folsom Old Town Water and Wastewater Project –Folsom, CA (Design/Construction Management)
Mr. Fisher is the Project Manager responsible for providing preliminary design, design and construction
administration services for the replacement of over 6,000-LF of water distribution and wastewater collection
system piping at several locations in the downtown area of Folsom. Design included replacement of over 60
service connections and appurtenance structures, and in several cases required relocation out of backyard
or congested easements into the City street to provide better long term O&M access.
City of Folsom Sewer Flow Meter Replacement –Folsom, CA (Design/Construction Management) Mr.
Fisher is the Project Manager responsible for design and construction phase oversight for the replacement
and/or construction of new gravity sewer flow meters at 17 locations throughout the City. Work included
survey; site assessment and layout; civil, mechanical, electrical and instrumentation design; and permitting.
City of Folsom Wet Utilities Rehabilitation and Replacement Program – Folsom, CA (Design) Mr. Fisher
was a senior engineer on the 2.5-miles of 6-inch to 12-inch DIP, PVC, & HDPE distribution & collection
system piping , 150 services at 10 locations; condition assessment, C-factor testing, corrosions assessment,
hydrant flow tests, environmental, geotechnical, surveying, construction methodology (traditional and
trenchless), and design & CM. Congested roadways and backyard alignments; utility coordination, pot
holing, right-of-way research / acquisition, pipeline routing analysis, permitting assistance, public outreach
and construction sequencing.
South Placer Municipal Utility District Upper Antelope Creek East Trunk Sewer –- Loomis, CA
(Planning/Design/Construction Management) Mr. Fisher was the Project Manager for 8000-LF of new 8”
HDPE and FPVC gravity sewer and decommissioning of Munoz Pump Station. Services included alignment
study, final design and construction administration; hydraulics and pipe material selection; utility
coordination; ROW and easement procurement; environmental permitting and public outreach.
City of Redding Renoir Trenchless Replacement Project – Redding, CA (Assessment) The City of Redding
has attempted to replace the Renoir sewer line (300’ of 8” ABS pipe), which has a significant sag and
requires excessive maintenance. Difficult subsurface geotechnical conditions and insufficient surface access
have rendered those attempts unsuccessful. WWE conducted a preliminary site exploration to identify and
review potential alignments, construction alternatives, constraints and fatal flaws. After review, the WWE
team produced a Trenchless Alternatives Analysis supporting the use of pipe bursting (from 8” to 10”)
preceded by targeted compaction grouting (to reduce the sag) as the most feasible trenchless replacement
option. Key to the analysis was confirming vibration attenuation and potential heave would limit impacts on
the residential home foundations on both sides of the pipe alignment and an AC waterline paralleling it.
Technical specifications and contract drawings were developed for to complete the work as part of the City’s
ongoing Capital Improvement Rehabilitation and Replacement Program.
MIKE FISHER, P.E.
Page 4 of 5
City of Alameda Lagoon Seawall Pipeline and Lift Station Replacement – Alameda, CA
(Planning/Design/Construction Management) Mr. Fisher was the Project Manager for the realignment of
1,000 LF of 6” VCP with new 8” gravity sewer using HDPE and FPVC; realignment of over 20 lateral
connections; 350-LF of 8” pipe using trenchless guided boring method to limit public impact; a new duplex
350 GPM package pump station and 700-LF of 4” FPVC forcemain; five residential E-One pump stations; and
abandonment of 1,000-LF of pipeline suspended on a seawall and the associated lift station. Project services
included alignment study, hydraulics; preliminary design report; final design and construction
administration; utility coordination; encroachment and easement procurement services; environmental
permitting, and significant public outreach.
City of San Mateo, 24th Avenue Sewer Relief Line – San Mateo, CA (Design/Construction Management) As
Project Manager, Fisher managed the replacement of 4,500 LF of 6-8” VCP with new 10-12” gravity sewer
using HDPE and FPVC; included replacement of over 60 lateral connections; 40-LF of bore and jack/pipe
ramming to go under drainage; alignment study, final design and construction administration; hydraulics
and pipe selection; utility coordination; ROW/encroachment services; and environmental permitting.
Hawaii Water Service Company Wastewater Collection System Improvement Projects – Pukalani, HI
(Design/Construction Phase Services) Mr. Fisher was the Project Manager for the replacement of over
2,250 LF of 6-8” sewer pipe with new 8” FPVC at three distinct locations throughout collection system;
reconnections of multiple residential laterals; and abandonment of 1,000-LF of deteriorated and sagging
backyard and inaccessible pipeline. Project services included alternatives assessment, hydraulics and pipe
selection; design and construction administration; utility coordination; encroachment and easement
procurement from Maui County and golf course; and significant public outreach to minimize impact of golf
course shut-down during construction.
City of Roseville Oak Street 63” Interceptor Relocation – Roseville, CA (Pre-Design/Design) Mr. Fisher was
the Project Manager on the assessment of relocation options for approximately 700-LF of 63” RCP;
alignment study, hydraulics; pipe selection; construction methodology (open cut versus tunneling) utility
coordination, traffic, business impacts; ROW/easement procurement; environmental constraints
assessment. Creating 30% design package that will be used to construct job using either traditional design-
bid-build or using City design-assist (CM @ Risk) procurement methodology.
Lewiston Community Services District Raw Water Pipeline - Lewiston, CA (Planning, Design, Construction
Management) Mr. Fisher was a senior engineer for 2,700 LF of 6” DIP and FPVC to replace existing parallel
line in extremely deteriorated condition. Project was funded under prop. 84 and compliance with CDPH
funding requirements. Project also included new 300-gpm raw water pump station and new infiltration
gallery on the banks of the Trinity River. Extreme environmental constraints required detailed specifications
to ensure Contractor mitigated potential fish hatchery disturbance.
East Bay Zoological Society – Oakland Zoo – Oakland, CA (Construction Inspection) As Senior Engineer, Mr.
Fisher provided design review and construction inspection for the installation of four (4) 100 to 300-LF 4” to
12” potable water, irrigation and sewer lines across an existing parking lot and drainage via Horizontal
Direction Drilling with fusible PVC. Provided Special Inspector services required by City of Oakland to
approve FPVC installation using HDD.
City of Redding Stillwater WAS Pipeline –Redding, CA (Design/Construction Management) Mr. Fisher was
a senior engineer for the 5-miles - 6” fusible PVC with 2,000 LF HDD crossing of I5 & Sacramento River;
alignment study, final design and construction admin; hydraulics; pipe selection; utility coordination; ROW
and easement procurement; environmental constraints assessment
MIKE FISHER, P.E.
Page 5 of 5
City of Redding Boulder Creek Sewer Interceptor – Redding, CA (Design/Construction Management) Mr.
Fisher was Project Manager/Senior Engineer for 20,000-LF of 28-inch to 8-inch HDPE and fusible PVC;
condition, capacity and corrosion assessment; plans and specifications for replacement of pipe using
combination of pipe-bursting, pipe-reaming, traditional auger bore & jack, HDD and CIPP.
City of Redding, Jenny Creek Elevated Sewer Interceptor – Redding, CA (Design/Construction

Management) Mr. Fisher was a senior engineer on the 3,000 LF- 16” DIP & 1000 LF – 18” HDPE; condition &
corrosion assessments of existing elevated steel pipeline; alternatives assessment; plans and specification
for replacement of elevated sewer line through highly sensitive creek environment.
City of Shasta Lake, Tierra Oaks Golf Course Reclaimed Pipeline Project –Shasta Lake, CA (Study/Design)
Mr. Fisher was the Project Manager overseeing 2-miles - 12” fusible PVC with proposed 1,200 LF HDD
crossing of Moody Creek Ravine; alignment study included analysis of 3 different pipeline, treatment and
storage options; hydraulics; pipe selection; utility coordination; ROW and easement procurement;
environmental constraints assessment and permitting.
Grant Line Road Reconstruction - Tracy, CA (Planning/Design/Construction Phase Services) Mr. Fisher was
a senior engineer on the 5,000 LF - 30” and 6,500-LF – 16” Fusible PVC to replace existing parallel lines in
extremely heavy traffic area, with significant existing utility density, including over 90 water and sewer
lateral replacements while maintaining service to existing clients.
PCWA Auburn Bypass Pipeline - Placer County, CA (Design) Mr. Fisher was QA/QC Manager for 4,600 LF –
20” DIP transmission pipe , including route and alignment considerations; construction methodology and
pipe material selection; encroachment permitting; preliminary design report; plans and specifications;
bidding support; and construction engineering services.
Airport Storm Drain Rehabilitation Project - Ukiah, CA (Assessment/Study/Design) Mr. Fisher was a senior
engineer for 2,600-LF of 12”, 18” & 24” cured-in-place pipe rehabilitation; included condition assessment,
hydraulic analysis, corrosion assessment, environmental, geotechnical, surveying, construction methodology
analysis, design & CM. Utilities beneath the runway and taxiway required considerable FAA coordination and
runway safety plan development and implementation oversight. Contract documents bid three construction
methods against one another ensuring competitive bidding environment
City of Roseville Creek Crossing Replacement Program - Roseville, CA Project (Study/Design) Mr. Fisher
was the Project Manager overseeing the 3,000-LF of 12-inch DIP at 5 separate creek crossing replacements,
planning, design and environmental permitting.
Nicholaus Road Forcemain - Lincoln, CA (Study/Design/Construction Management) Mr. Fisher was the
Project Manager overseeing the 5,000-LF, 12” C900 PVC force main utilizing tradition and trenchless
construction methodologies. Selected alternative maximized use of existing structures and alignment to
minimize equipment capital investment and ROW procurement costs.
The Railyards - Sacramento, CA (Planning) As Senior Engineer, Mr. Fisher was responsible for master
planning, modeling and hydraulic design of wet infrastructure for 238-acre infill project; 2,500-LF of 42-inch
PCCP transmission line and 5-miles of 8-inch to 12-inch distribution mains, 2-miles of 30-inch VCP
interceptor and 4-miles of 8-inch to 18-inch collection mains; 5-miles of 60-inch to 12-inch storm water
collection piping.
Civil/Environmental Engineer
Mr. Geselbracht has over 32 years of experience in water and wastewater system
planning, design and operations. Mr. Geselbracht has extensive experience with
membrane treatment of drinking and recycled water. A Principal of Water Works
Engineers, Mr. Geselbracht is WWE’s Chief Engineer, and in this role, he is a Technical
Advisor for all major projects for the firm.
Project Role Representative Project Experience

Principal-in-
Charge/Project
Manager Oakland Zoo California Exhibit Pump Stations, Oakland CA (Design) Mr. Geselbracht
was the Principal-in-Charge and Project Manager for the project to design a multi-
Years of purpose pump station for domestic, irrigation and fire protection water for the
California Exhibit expansion at the Oakland Zoo.
Experience
32 Contra Costa Water District Los Vaqueros Energy Recovery Project, - Concord, CA
(Design) Mr. Geselbracht was the Principal-in-charge, Project Manager and lead
Education hydraulic engineer on the design-build team to construct a 1.0 MW low-head hydro
M.S. - turbine on a raw water transmission pipeline owned and operated by CCWD. The
Environmental turbine facility will operate in parallel with an existing pressure reducing station used
Engineering, to burn excess head when transferring water from the Los Vaqueros reservoir into the
University of Contra Costa Canal. For flows up to approximately 150 cfs, all of the water will pass
Illinois, through the turbine. At flows from 150 to 250 cfs, the additional flow will continue to
(1985) flow through the existing sleeve valves. The hydro turbine is a Francis Turbine
operating at a speed of 360 rpm. Feed and discharge piping to the turbine are 60”
B.S. - Civil and 66” welded steel pipe, respectively.
Engineering,
University of Notre
Dame Contra Costa Water District Bollman WTP Clearwell Modifications and Ammonia
(1980) Mixing Analysis, – Concord, CA (Design) Mr. Geselbracht was the Principal-in-Charge
of a project to conduct an analysis of the clearwell and associated piping in order to
Registration provide recommendations of modifications to improve mixing of ammonia at the
Registered Civil clearwell entrance, reduce short circuiting, and improve clearwell sampling. The
Engineer: CCWD system operates using chloramines as the secondary disinfectant and the
California--C46621 District had identified improving the performance of the Bollman WTP clearwell as
Hawaii—13362C one of several key items in their nitrification action plan.
Memberships Contra Costa Water District Randall Bold WTP Sedimentation Basin Addition, –
WEF Oakley, CA Mr. Geselbracht was the Principal-in-Charge and provided QA/QC
CWEA oversight for the process mechanical design of new rapid mix, flocculation and
sedimentation facilities added into the 40 mgd Randall Bold WTP. The design
included sludge pumps to transfer the sedimentation basin sludge to existing sludge
lagoons.
Contra Costa Water District Bollman WTP Operations Building and Chemical
Systems Renewal and Replacement Project, – Concord, CA (Design) Mr. Geselbracht
was the Principal-in-Charge and provided QA/QC oversight for a project to replace
chemical piping and add chemical containment trenches into the 75 mgd Bollman
WTP.
Page 2 of 3
Contra Costa Water District Distribution Main Design, – Concord, CA (Design) Designed a 1000 LF 12-inch
water distribution main to the Antioch operations center with an above-ground crossing and a
hydropneumatic pump system.
City of Milpitas Water System Seismic Study - Milpitas, CA (Study) Mr. Geselbracht was the Principal-in-
Charge and provided QA/QC oversight for a study of the seismic vulnerability of the City of Milpitas’ water
distribution system. The study identified critical infrastructure that should be strengthened, provided
suggested details for strengthening the system, and recommended components of an earthquake response
program, including spare parts and contract services.
San Luis Hilltop Estates, Santa Nella, CA (Design) Mr. Geselbracht developed the conceptual design for a
new surface water treatment facility rated at 0.5 mgd to supply drinking water to a proposed 250-home
development near Santa Nella. The facility would treat raw water from the California Aqueduct using
sedimentation followed by microfiltration and chlorine disinfection. The cost of this new facility was
compared to the cost of supplying water from a nearby municipal system.
Maricopa Groves Water Treatment - Maricopa AZ (Design) Mr. Geselbracht was the Project Manager and
lead process designer for the design of the pretreatment and civil components of a 2.5 mgd surface water
treatment plant. The project began with a conceptual study of pretreatment options, including
conventional flocculation/sedimentation, lamella plate settlers, dissolved air flotation (DAF) and ballasted
flocculation/sedimentation (BF/S). DAF and BF/S were shortlisted and Jim led the preparation of
procurement plans and specifications between the two technologies. DAF was selected for procurement,
and Jim is now leading the detailed design of the DAF facility.
Agua Fria Water Treatment Plant Site Planning Study, Arizona-American Water Company - Phoenix, AZ
(Planning) Mr. Geselbracht conducted facilities planning work for a new water treatment plant to be located
in the Agua Fria area of Maricopa County, Arizona. Services included a recommendation to purchase a
parcel of land for the water treatment plant from a selected list of potential sites. Mr. Geselbracht reviewed
background data including previous planning studies and water quality, evaluated alternatives for treatment
technologies including conventional versus membrane treatment technologies, developed potential plant
layouts, and identified potential problems associated with the alternative sites.
California Water Service Company WTP Backwash Recovery Study - Bakersfield, CA (Study) Mr.
Geselbracht was the Process Engineer on a project to examine the existing 8 mgd coagulation/direct
membrane filtration (MF) WTP and perform a series of coagulation and settling tests at the WTP on the
equalized MF backwash (which contained primarily polyaluminum chloride floc). Following the testing, and
based on the observations made, an analysis of applicable treatment options for backwash water treatment
was made.
Arizona American Water Company Anthem Water Campus WTP Phase 4 Expansion, – Phoenix, AZ
(Design) Mr. Geselbracht provided QA/QC and process design oversight for the design of the expansion of
the Anthem Water Treatment Plant (WTP) to increase capacity from 3.0 mgd to 7.0 mgd. The Anthem
Water Campus is a water and wastewater treatment facility, owned by a private utility company, serving the
Del Webb Anthem Community, a residential development along I-17 in North Phoenix. The WTP uses a
membrane filtration system for treating water from the Central Arizona Project (CAP) Canal. The design
included a new raw water storage basin, raw water pump station, membrane filtration process tank,
backpulse tank and containment structure, an expansion of the finished water pump station, a new
automated chemical cleaning system, laboratory and administration building, maintenance garage, and
expansions of the process equipment, process air, and process electrical and controls systems.
Page 3 of 3
City of Scottsdale Water Campus Phase III Expansion Project - Scottsdale, AZ (Design), Mr. Geselbracht
provided QA/QC review and Process Design for the Expansion of the Water Reclamation Facility.
Improvements to the Advanced Water Treatment Plant included operating the MF and RO system to achieve
138-mgd permeate capacity through the RO system, to be achieved through existing equipment.
Modifications to be made at the post-treatment area due to the limited capacity of the decarbonators, the
leaking problems and the limited storage volume in the lime addition system.
City of Prescott Airport, Reclaimed Water Pump Station, Prescott, AZ (Design/ CA) Mr. Geselbracht served
as the QC Engineer on the design of a new 3.75 mgd WRF to address future growth and increased influent
strength. Process design included analysis of influent wastewater flows and loadings, equalization options,
and expansion/phasing plan for all phases ranging from 3.75 to 15 mgd treatment capacity. The process
units were designed to meet Class A+ requirements. Construction administration services including
construction administration, field inspection, special inspection, startup and commissioning assistance,
warranty phase assistance and Electronic Operation and Maintenance Manual were provided as well as
process optimization and design development for the Sundog Wastewater Treatment Plant
Nitrification/DeNitrification Improvements.
City of Mesa Arsenic Removal Pilot Testing - Mesa, AZ (QA/QC) Mr. Geselbracht provided QA/QC oversight
for bench and pilot testing at the City of Mesa AZ where a variety of three adsorptive media (GFH, Bayoxide
E33, WRT Z33) were considered for arsenic removal. Bench testing consisted of batch isotherm testing and
Rapid Small Scale testing of seven arsenic removal media.
City of San Diego Water Resources Planning Services for Otay Water Treatment Plant, San Diego, CA
Mr. Geselbracht provided an analysis of retrofit needs and alternatives for media filters at the Otay WTP.
The evaluation included development of alternatives for expanding the capacity of the plant to 60 mgd.
Additionally, Jim also completed an analysis of disposal requirements for chemical cleaning wastes from a 60
mgd membrane treatment facility at the Otay WTP. The analysis included an estimate of the quantities and
characteristics of the cleaning wastes for each of five potential suppliers along with preliminary
sizing/layout/costing of the alternative for solar evaporation of the wastes. The City decided to proceed
with pursuing disposal of the wastes through a new sewer connection.
City of Mesa Detailed Adsorption Design at Falcon Field Well No. 4 - Mesa, AZ (Design) Following the
successful completion of the pilot testing (described above), Mr. Geselbracht provided QA/QC oversight for
the detailed design of the arsenic adsorption system at the City’s Falcon Field Well #4, a 3,000 gpm capacity
well. The Falcon Field well water quality is the most challenging of the City’s 18 impacted wells with high
arsenic (35 ug/L), high silica (42 mg/L), moderately high pH (7.7) and moderate vanadium concentrations (17
ug/L).
City of Chandler Adsorption Design and Construction, Chandler, AZ (Design) Mr. Geselbracht provided
QA/QC oversight for the detailed design for new wellhead treatment facilities owned and operated by the
City of Chandler. The project involved 14 well sites; half of the total well sites currently operated by the City.
As part of the conceptual design, the project team assisted the City in evaluating and selecting the
appropriate technologies and making recommendations for technologies, implementation priorities, and
clustering sites.
East Bay Municipal Utility District Bay Area Regional Desalination Project,– Oakland, CA (Study) Mr.
Geselbracht was the Principal-in-Charge and provided QA/QC oversight for a study of three potential sites
for a Regional Desalination Plant to serve as a backup water supply to East Bay MUD, San Francisco Water
Dept. and the Contra Costa Water District. The study evaluated the mechanisms for transferring water to
the other two agencies when the plant was located at a site within the 3rd agency’s area.
Gilbert A. Fuentes, P.E.
Civil/Environmental Engineer
Mr. Fuentes is a staff engineer with 4 years experience, who is currently providing
construction management services on numerous projects. Typical duties include
technical report preparation, operations guide preparation, review of contractor
documents, client interaction, contractor interaction, field visits, inspections, and
engineering services during construction.
Project Role Representative Project Experience

Staff Engineer
Years with WWE Water Treatment Projects

1 California Water Service Company Dominguez Treatment Facilities Project – Carson
and Long Beach, CA (Construction Management) Mr. Fuentes is currently providing
Education construction management for California Water Service Company’s (CWSC’s) Well 275-
01 and 294-01 treatment facility upgrades. The project consists of bringing Well 275-
B.S. – Civil
01 and 294-01 back into operation while meeting CWSC’s water quality goals
Engineering,
including color, odor, sulfide and methane removal from the groundwater and the
California State
reduction of total trihalomethanes in the finished water. The facility improvements
Polytechnic
design are underway at Well 275-01 (800 gpm) and 294-01 (1,200 gpm) utilizing the
University, Pomona
(2010) following process train: automatic backwash filters, air stripping, gas scrubbers,
booster pumps, ion exchange and disinfection through chloramination (sodium)
hypochlorite and ammonium hydroxide. The construction management services Mr.
Registration Fuentes provides includes submittal reviews, operation and maintenance (O&M)
Professional Engineer manual reviews, processing Request For Information (RFI) and Change Order Requests
(Civil): (COR) from the contractor and field inspections during construction.
California C82635
City of Montague, WTP Improvements – Montague, CA (Construction/Operations)
Credentials Mr. Fuentes is currently providing construction/operations support for the City of
Certified QSP Montague’s 1 mgd surface water treatment plant improvements required to reduce
disinfection byproduct formation, reduce finished water taste and odor, and improve
plant reliability. The City’s source water presents several challenges including high pH
and alkalinity, dissolved organic carbon, and algal growth. Mr. Fuentes is providing
operations and maintenance (O&M) manual review for each treatment equipment
process and is preparing the water treatment plant’s operations guide. The
operations guide includes operational criteria and control scheme for chemical feed
pumps, flocculation & sedimentation basins, microfiltration, granular activated
carbon and more.
Wastewater Collection Infrastructure

Riverside Water Quality Control Plant (RWQCP) Improvements, Riverside, CA
(Inspections) Mr. Fuentes provided structural observations/inspections and reporting
of a concrete primary clarifier during construction for the RWQCP improvements.
Safety Projects
Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority Ferric Chloride Station Safety
Improvements –Albuquerque, NM (Construction) Mr. Fuentes conducts equipment
submittal reviews for the contractor during construction of multiple improvements to
ABCWUA’s Station 70, ferric chloride railcar unloading and transfer station.
Structural/Civil Engineer
Mr. Kellogg is a structural engineer with ten years of experience in design and
construction. He is well versed in the analysis and design of various structures
associated with water and wastewater treatment facilities including buildings,
bridges, retaining structures, buried structures, pump stations, chemical storage
facilities and storage tanks/reservoirs. His thorough understanding of both static and
dynamic loading allows him to develop creative and cost effective solutions to meet
Project Role our client’s structural engineering needs. In addition to structural design Mr. Kellogg
Project Engineer has also worked as a resident engineer providing construction management services
for large and small construction projects.
Years of
10
San Jose Water Company Overlook Reservoir and Pump Station Project – Santa
Education Clara County, CA (Structural Design) Mr. Kellogg provided the structural engineering
B.S. – Civil for a booster pump station that consisted of skid mounted mechanical equipment and
Engineering with electrical equipment. Mr. Kellogg also designed a 1.5 MG partially buried prestressed
concrete water storage tank. Proper coordination was required between the project
an emphasis in
geotechnical engineer and tank prestressing contractor to achieve a quality, efficient,
Structures
California State structure.
Polytechnic San Jose Water Company McKean Road Reservoir and Pipeline Project – San Jose,
University, San Luis CA (Structural Design) Mr. Kellogg was responsible for providing the structural design
Obispo of the foundation for a new 1.0 MG welded steel tank, approximately 200-lf pipe
bridge, and 40-lf vehicle bridge.
Registration
Professional San Jose Water Company Vickery Avenue Reservoir Replacement Project - Saratoga,
Engineer (Civil): CA (Structural Design) Mr. Kellogg provided the structural design of a 2.0 MG and a
California C73233 5.8 MG prestressed concrete water storage tank. The construction site was situated
Arizona 51695 on top of an existing earthen reservoir, lined and covered, with poor soils that had
New Mexico 20500 exhibited landslide behavior in recent years. Phase one of the project consisted of
(Structural): reducing the size of the existing earthen reservoir to make room for the construction
California S5698 of the 2.0 MG tank while keeping the existing reservoir in service during construction
Arizona 53585 of the 2.0 MG tank. Structural design was provided for an earthen dam and a roof
Hawaii 14904 retrofit to connect to the existing roof to the temporary dam during phase one.
Utah 8464725- Extensive foundation work was required to provide a bearing surface suitable of
2203 supporting the concrete tanks and while avoiding excessive deflection or differential
settlement. Mr. Kellogg worked with the project geotechnical engineer and tank
prestressing contractor to ensure that all aspects of the tank design were coordinated
Credentials
between parties.
Certified QSP
California Water Service Company Palos Verdes Pump Station 30 Improvements -
Palos Verdes, CA (Construction Management) Mr. Kellogg provided project
Memberships coordination and construction management on electrical improvements to upgrade
SCSEA an existing water pump station. Project improvements consisted of the addition of
SEAOC – Board of new switchgear, motor control centers, new electrical conduit and drain piping and
Directors new concrete structural support slabs.
APWA
Page 2 of 3
California Water Service Company Dominguez Wells 275 and 294 - Long Beach and Carson, CA (Structural
Design) Mr. Kellogg was the structural designer for improvements to provide additional water treatment
equipment at an existing water treatment plant. Improvements consisted of the addition of several
masonry buildings, air strippers, metal shade structures, bolted steel, HDPE and FRP water storage tanks and
improvements to existing structures.
Montague Water Treatment Plant Upgrade – Montague, CA (Structural Design) Mr. Kellogg provided the
structural engineering for the upgrades at the Montague Water Treatment Plant. The upgrades consisted of
the design of concrete sludge drying beds, a bulk chemical concrete storage facility, aluminum walkways
above an existing flocculation and sedimentation basin, architectural and structural design of a partially
buried masonry pump station building, and the foundation design for a prefabricated metal building.
Navajo Tribal Utility Authority, Water and Wastewater Master Plan and Associated Facilities, Upper
Fruitland Casino – NM (Structural Design) Mr. Kellogg designed a welded steel water storage tank
foundation, a single story concrete masonry building to house booster pumps, and treatment equipment
and electrical equipment for a potable water delivery system and the structural design of a below grade
cast-in-place concrete equalization tank.
City of Phoenix Remote Facilities Rehabilitations – Phoenix, AZ (Structural Design) Mr. Kellogg provided
structural design for numerous groundwater well site rehabilitations. Each site offered its unique challenges
dealing with site constraints, existing structure coordination, and topographic variations. Most sites
included the structural design of hydropneumatic tank foundations and electrical equipment foundations,
masonry retaining walls, site perimeter masonry fences, and steel shade canopy structures.
Lewiston Valley Water Company Water Supply Improvements - Lewiston, CA (Structural Design) Mr.
Kellogg provided architectural and structural design of a new masonry building to house new water supply
vertical turbine pumps. A new cast-in-place concrete wet well approximately 20-feet deep and placed
directly below the new masonry building was incorporated into the building design. The project also
included upgrades at the water treatment plant. The water treatment plant upgrades consisted of the
architectural and structural design of a new masonry building to house new water treatment equipment.
Upgrades to the water storage capacity were provided by the structural design of a welded steel tank
foundation and concrete cast-in-place retaining wall.
Redway Community Services District Water Treatment Plant Improvements - Redway, CA (Construction
Management) Mr. Kellogg provided project coordination and construction management for an upgrade to
an existing water treatment plant. The project consisted of upgrades to the existing water treatment plant
and the addition of a 500,000 gallon welded steel water storage tank. Special inspections were performed
on the welded steel tank foundation which consisted of cast in drilled hole piles.
City of Prescott Zone 101 Pump Station – Prescott, AZ (Structural Design) Mr. Kellogg provided the
structural design of a 3,000-sf masonry building to house the mechanical and electrical equipment needed
for the Zone 101 pump station. The structure consisted of masonry walls and open web steel joists.
City of Redding Stillwater Wastewater Treatment Plant Phase 1A/1B Expansion Project - Redding, CA
(Construction Management) Mr. Kellogg assisted the Resident Engineer on the Stillwater Phase 1A/1B
expansion project by reviewing various structural related items such as requests for change, requests for
information and submittals. Mr. Kellogg also preformed field inspections of the structural components.
City of Redding Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Biosolids Dewatering Project - Redding, CA
(Structural Design) Mr. Kellogg provided structural engineering design for a two story building housing
centrifuges, other dewatering equipment and two load out bays. The building consisted of first level cast in
place concrete walls and diaphragm and a steel framed structure with special steel concentric braced frames
at the second level.
Page 3 of 3
City of Redding Boulder Creek Sewer Interceptor - Redding, CA (Construction Management) Mr. Kellogg
provided project coordination and construction management for a new 28” sewer interceptor. The project
consisted of installing a new sanitary sewer by removing and replacing an existing sanitary sewer through an
environmentally sensitive drainage. Mr. Kellogg reviewed and approved submittals, requests for
information, requests for change, payment applications, construction observation and verified construction
compliance with environmental documents.
City of Redding Mary Street Lift Station - Redding, CA (Construction Management) Mr. Kellogg provided
project coordination and construction management for a new sewer lift station. The project consists of four
dry-pit submersible sewer pumps housed in a partially buried concrete structure. Reviewed and approved
submittals, requests for information, requests for change, and payment applications.
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station PVNGS WRF Train 7 – Maricopa County, AZ (Structural Design) Mr.
Kellogg provided structural design for the addition of two cast-in-place concrete clarifiers, 125-feet and 140-
feet in diameter. The clarifier design included an 8-foot diameter access tunnel under one clarifier to access
a pair of pumps near the center of the clarifier. To access the tunnel an approximately 30-foot deep access
structure was designed adjacent to one clarifier with a stairway down to the tunnel elevation. The train 7
additions also included the foundation design for a metal building used to house electrical equipment and
the design of an above grade walkway that provided access from an existing walkway to the above grade
portion of the new clarifiers.
Lake Cachuma Temporary Pump Station - Lake Cachuma, CA (Structural Design) This emergency design
build project required the unique structural design to connect a temporary floating pipeline to an existing
intake tower in Lake Cachuma. Mr. Kellogg was responsible for designing a fabricated steel box that served
as the connection of the floating pipeline to the existing cast-in-place intake tower. The project also
consisted of the design of a floating pump station that was capable of being relocated depending on lake
levels.
Henness Arsenic Removal Facility Expansion - Casa Grande, AZ (Structural Design) Mr. Kellogg provided the
structural engineering for various facilities incorporated into the expansion project. The facility structural
design consisted of filter vessel foundations, concrete chemical storage facility, steel shade canopies, welded
steel tank hopper bottom foundation, and a supernatant cast-in-place pump station.
Salt Lake City Water Reclamation Facility Influent Pump Station Building Rehabilitation – Salt Lake City
(Structural Design) The facility provides all of the influent pumping capacity for the entire water reclamation
facility and has been in service for over 60 years. The life of the facility and lack of concrete protection had
resulted in concrete degradation and other issues consistent with facilities built in this timeframe. Mr.
Kellogg provided field reconnaissance to document the extent and severity of the required rehabilitation.
Mr. Kellogg provided a complete comprehensive evaluation of the available as-built drawings to determine
the compliance of the facility with current seismic building codes. After the evaluations were completed
and rehabilitations selected Mr. Kellogg provided construction drawings and specifications that were used to
provide concrete rehabilitation and equipment anchorage.
City of Mesa Pecos Road Sulfide Control Station – Mesa, AZ (Structural Design) Mr. Kellogg provided
architectural and structural design of a concrete masonry building and site perimeter wrought iron and
masonry fence. The project also consisted of designing a chemical containment area with chemical storage
tanks and a remote chemical fill station hydraulics and pipe selection; utility coordination; ROW and
easement procurement; environmental permitting.
GREGORY A. FRON, P.E.
Electrical Instrumentation & Controls Engineer
Mr. Fron has over 25 years of experience in electrical instrumentation and controls
engineering and contracting projects involving industrial and water/wastewater
projects. Mr. Fron brings with him a wealth of experience with specialty and general
electrical and instrumentation and controls (I&C) design and management including
power distribution, DCS/PLCs, SCADA, instrumentation, custom electrical controls,
Project Role remote telemetry/terminal units (RTU) networks, equipment specifications, site
Electrical evaluations, project estimations, bid services, construction support, project startup
Instrumentation and and warranty service coordination.
Controls Engineer
Representative Project Experience with WaterWorks
Years of EPCOR Water – Loop 303 WWRF Design, Surprise AZ Mr. Fron is the lead electrical
and instrumentation controls engineer for the design of a new 8MGD wastewater
Experience reclamation plant and associated systems being prepared in multiple phases. The
25 design includes head works, equalization, clarification, aeration, sludge digesters,
chemical storage and metering systems; Allen Bradley ControlLogix Redundant PLC
Education based control system with graphical user interface, and specifications.
B.S. - Electrical
Engineering, EPCOR Water – Water Plants WP-8 and 10 THHM Mitigation, Surprise AZ Mr. Fron is
University of Arizona the lead electrical and instrumentation controls engineer for the design of a new
(2004) aeration system dedicated to 4 existing potable water reservoirs. The design includes
modifications to the existing power and control systems.
Registration
Registered Electrical Cal Water South San Francisco Water Plant No.1 Mr. Fron is the lead electrical and
Engineer: instrumentation controls engineer for the design of the expansion of the existing
Arizona - 48333 filtration system and modifications to the chemical feed systems. The design includes
California – 20796 modifications to the existing power and control systems including revised control
Nevada – 22878 strategies associated with Ammonia monitoring.
Texas – 117636
Utah - 9062312-2202 Town of Florence, AZ- North Reservoir and Booster Pump Station Mr. Fron is the
lead electrical and instrumentation controls engineer for the design of a new potable
MSHA Trained water storage and distribution booster pump system dedicated to 1 existing potable
OSHA 10Hr Trained water reservoir and a new reservoir for added capacity. The design includes
modifications to the existing power and control systems.
Memberships Town of Florence, AZ- WWRF Reuse Water Pump Station Mr. Fron is the lead
ISA – International electrical and instrumentation controls engineer for the design of a new reuse pump
Society of Automation station and lab building. The design includes modifications to the existing power and
AWWA – American control systems.
Water Works
Association (I&C Town of Florence, AZ- WWRF Effluent filter system Mr. Fron is the lead electrical and
Committee member) instrumentation controls engineer for the design of 2 new effluent filters. The design
AWWA Small Systems includes modifications to the existing power and control systems.
Outreach Services
Committee member City of Prescott, AZ- Zone 101 Reservoir and Booster Pump Station Mr. Fron is the
NFPA – National Fire lead electrical and instrumentation controls engineer for the design of a new
Protection Association distribution booster pump station. The design includes new electrical services and
AZ Water control system to replace an existing power service and control systems currently
supporting the site potable water storage reservoir.
Page 2 of 3
Oakland Zoo, Oakland, CA- Irrigation and Fire Pump systems Mr. Fron is the lead electrical and
instrumentation controls engineer for the design of new domestic, fire and irrigation booster pump stations
within the zoo property. The design includes power distribution from an existing electrical switch board
within the Zoo’s veterinary hospital and cellular wireless remote monitoring.
Motorola, Scottsdale, AZ- Ground water extraction well 7EX-6MA Mr. Fron is the lead electrical and
instrumentation controls engineer for the design of a new ground water extraction well. The design includes
new electrical service extension and control system including hardwired Profibus communications with its
associated treatment facility located in the proximity of the well. The well system replaces an out of service
extraction well.
Representative Project Experience prior to Joining WaterWorks

City of Phoenix - As an I&C team leader Mr. Fron authored a Design Guide for Analytical Instruments,
Phoenix AZ The guide was organized to provide reference and general information regarding analytical
instruments and associated constituents being evaluated, measured or estimated for purposes of water and
wastewater treatment and reuse.
Mesa AZ - Lead Instrumentation and Controls Design Engineer, Southeast Water Reclamation Plant
Disinfection Improvements Mr. Fron designed (100% P&IDs and controls descriptions) the I&C phase of a
new wastewater reclamation plant effluent disinfection system. The design included chemical storage and
metering systems, Modicon PLC based control system, and specifications.
Casa Grande, AZ - Lead Instrumentation and Controls Design Engineer, Frito Lay Water Recovery and
Reuse Design Build Project Mr. Fron coordinated and developed the instrumentation and controls design
along with specifications for a 0.7 MGD food production line waste water recycling system. The system
captured 85% of the water for reuse in the production facility. The project included the integration of
several vendor packaged systems to operate from a central supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA)
system. The facility is comprised of primary feed pumps, screening, primary clarification, Membrane Bio
Reactors, low pressure Reverse Osmosis, UV and chemical disinfection, pH control and final recovered water
delivery system to the plant. Also, included in the design is a dewatering centrifuge for corn and potato
solids generated by screening for agricultural feed applications and a thickening centrifuge for waste
activated sludge (WAS), generated by the primary clarifiers, for onsite and offsite disposal of process waste.
The control system is made up of a master programmable controller (PLC), and various remote PLCs, with
operator workstations and human machine interfaces located throughout the facility.
City of Goodyear, AZ - Lead Electrical Engineer, Portable Generator Connection System and Connection
Instructions Mr. Fron coordinated and specified portable generator connections at several remote well and
booster pump sites. The project included the preparation of generator connection cabling and receptacles,
providing formal generator connection instruction documents, and demonstrating the operations for
inclusion in standard operating procedures.
City of Goodyear, AZ - Lead Electrical and Field Engineer, Potable Water Production Wells Mr. Fron
designed and placed into service three potable ground water production wells under a design/build contract
with an area contractor. Each well is equipped with a VFD pump and an RTU for remote communications
with a master control panel and operators station at the City of Goodyear’s Water Campus. Mr. Fron
provided custom, fast-track design, fabrication, and FAT testing of the master control panel in order to
facilitate completion of the emergency enhancements phase of the development.
City of Goodyear, AZ - Lead EI&C Engineer, 5.5 MGD Bullard Water Campus Reverse Osmosis Treatment
Facility The Water Campus was created to treat potable water for storage and citywide distribution. The
facility processes the raw ground water of five deep wells. Emergency preparation of a temporary plant and
further upgrades and enhancements took place with the final campus being erected and commissioned to
Page 3 of 3
process up to 5.5 mgd of potable treated water. Mr. Fron designed the temporary and final campus area
power and SCADA network architecture and fabricated the temporary master control panel to meet an
aggressive schedule for compliance. He participated in the preliminary design efforts, development of
process and instrumentation diagrams, and contractor coordination of the design.
City of Phoenix, AZ - Lead EI&C Engineer, Infrastructure Improvements Design The project included the
preliminary design report and 30% design documents for a large potable water booster station and pipeline
improvements for the Camelback corridor. Remote telemetry system upgrades were included along with
COP design standards and specifications.
Tucson, AZ - Electrical and Instrumentation Systems Lead Design Engineer, Roger Road Water Reclamation
Facility Digester Gas Recovery System Improvements (Pima County) This project was a fast-track design for
bid under a Job Order Contract. The project consisted of upgrades to three 60HP gas compressor drives,
from across the line full voltage non- reversing starters, to VFDs. The recovered natural gas is utilized by
three parallel 400KW generators and gas powered pumps. The remainder of the recovered gas is disposed
of with a flare system. Mr. Fron provided preconstruction services, existing system inspection and
evaluation, remote I/O expansion design, process and instrumentation diagrams, and system startup
planning. A new, environmentally coated 70-ton chiller unit replaced an existing failed unit used to provide
pre and post compressor stage gas cooling. In addition, the condensation collection system was upgraded to
support automatic operations.
City of Tolleson, AZ - Electrical and Instrumentation Systems Design Engineer, Tolleson Wastewater
Treatment Plant Improvements Mr. Fron provided power system design for upgrades to the facility’s
headworks, addition of new rotary drum thickeners, thickened sludge transfer pumps, digester covers and
gas recovery system, plant primary power service and distribution system replacement, new odor control
and monitoring equipment, and new belt filter press. Mr. Fron prepared construction documents for these
systems, as well as specifications and site surveys for preconstruction evaluations.
Phoenix, AZ - Electrical and Instrumentation Systems Design Engineer, Onsite Industrial Wastewater
Treatment Facility Improvements, Aerospace Manufacturing Firm This design project included the
following process upgrades and system improvements: Twelve VFD process pumps to provide closed-loop,
pressurized feed systems for pH balance to various process points, VFDs for process product transfer pumps
and upgraded plant control panel with new PLC utilizing upgrade migration kit and SCADA system
programming modifications. Mr. Fron also upgraded area sump control systems and provided updated
master control panel record drawings.
City of Surprise, AZ - Electrical and Instrumentation Systems Design Engineer, SPA 3 Wastewater
Treatment Plant This design project was put on indefinite hold due to a lack of developmental investment.
The project design reached the 60 percent submittal and consisted of a complete 20-mgd plant including
headworks, secondary membrane bioreactors (MBRs), aeration, centrifuge sludge thickening, odor control,
administration facility, power and communications plant distribution system with emergency standby
generators, and other subsystems. Mr. Fron also prepared and provided specifications.
Electrical and Instrumentation Systems Design Engineer, Ina Road Water Reclamation Facility Scum Pump
System Improvements, Pima County, AZ. Mr. Fron replaced four primary scum pumps and provided system
improvements to include connections to level monitoring bubbler system from two scum pits and new flow
and pressure monitoring system. Mr. Fron also performed construction services and inspection.
Electrical and Instrumentation Systems Design Engineer, Turquoise Valley Golf Course Irrigation Source
Upgrades and Pond Water Transfer System, Bisbee, AZ. Mr. Fron provided a new influent control valve with
pond-level control and a new pond-to-pond, level-controlled transfer pump system.
Electrical, Instrumentation, and Control Systems Design Engineer/Inspector/Final System Integrator,
Roger Road Water Reclamation Facility Sludge Thickener System, Pima County, AZ. Mr. Fron designed and
CRAIG S. WORRALL, C.E.T.
Lead Designer
Mr. Worrall serves as lead engineering technician and lead mechanical technician for
design projects primarily involving water and wastewater treatment, pumping, and
conveyance facilities. Craig has 22 years of experience in the production and
management of water and wastewater treatment and conveyance projects and has
been responsible for producing computer-aided drafting and design (CADD) and
manually drafted drawings from project start to finish. He coordinates drawings
Project Role between civil, mechanical, structural, and electrical disciplines. Craig is proficient in
Lead Designer AutoCAD, MicroStation V8, MicroStation 3D, Triforma, and other software
applications.
Years of
22
Wastewater and Pump Project Experience
Education City of Redding Stillwater WWTP Upgrade and Expansion - Redding, CA Mr. Worrall
B.S. – Business provided mechanical and chemical drawings for preparation of plans and
Management, specifications for future upgrade and expansions to the facility. The WWTP currently
University of treats 2.6-mgd of ADWF. The facility plan addressed the design alternatives and life
Phoenix cycle costs for each unit process within the WWTP and incorporated findings into a
(2006) detailed phasing and implementation plan.
A.A. – Mechanical City of Shasta Lake Pump Station 2011 Improvements - City of Shasta Lake, CA Mr.
Engineering Worrall performed 3D design and layout for a duplex 25-HP 1,500 GPM submersible
Technology, pump station, decommissioning of existing station, and roof replacements for 3 other
Shasta College, stations. Project included considerable re-use of existing facilities to minimize capital
Redding investment and accelerated schedule to take advantage of favorable bid
environment.
A.A. – Drafting
Technology, Hawaii Water Service Co., Pukalani WWTP, Maui, HI Mr. Worrall provided
Shasta College, mechanical, chemical, civil, and structural drawings of a 0.4 mgd membrane
Redding bioreactor project. The project used the Kubota microfiltration membrane to filter
mixed liquor prior to UV disinfection to produce R-1 water for irrigating a golf course.
Certificate –
Natural Resource City of Redding Mary Street Lift Station - Replacement, Redding, CA Mr. Worrall
Surveying, performed 3D design and layout for the replacement of an existing dry-pit sewage lift
Shasta College, station with new 3-mgd dry-pit sewage lift station. Included self-cleaning wetwell
Redding design, influent grinder, dual-forcemain discharge (low flow/high flow), and
overflow/drainback pond.
Certificate –
Drafting
Technology, Lake of the Pines Lift Station No. 12 – Auburn, CA Mr. Worrall provided civil and
Shasta College, structural drawings of the new Sewage Lift Station no. 12, a duplex lit station with two
Redding 400-gpm submersible sewage pumps.
Registration
National Institute of
Certified
Engineering
Technicians (NICET):
Certified Mechanical
Engineering
Technician
Page 2 of 3
Arroyo Vista Water Storage Tank and Booster Pump Station – Phoenix, AZ Mr. Worrall performed 3D
design and layout of a new 500,000 welded steel water storage tank, a 3200 pgm capacity booster pump
station and a chlorine gas storage and feed facility.
City of Redding North Market Lift Station Replacement –Redding, CA Mr. Worrall provided mechanical,
civil and structural drawings for a new lift station that used Vertical Turbine Solids Handling pumps in a new
self cleaning trench-type wetwell.
Bay Farm Island Sewage Pump Station - Alameda, CA, Mr. Worrall provided civil and structural drawings
for a duplex 35-HP 2,500 GPM triplex submersible pump station, rehabilitation and re-tasking of existing
wet/dry well as self-cleaning wet well.
Water Project Experience

California Water Service Company, Dominguez Treatment Facilities Project – Carson and Long Beach, CA
The facility improvements design were completed on Well 275-01 (800 gpm) and 294-01 (1,200 gpm)
utilizing the following process train: automatic backwash filters, air stripping, gas scrubbers, booster pumps,
ion exchange and disinfection through chloramination (sodium) hypochlorite and ammonium hydroxide.
Mr. Worrall performed the 3D layout of this design.
California Water Service Company, Hawthorne WTP - Hawthorne, CA The Hawthorne WTP treats
groundwater to water quality standards. A design/ build project to improve and to restart the existing WTP.
The contaminants of concern included color, methane, TOC/DOC, ammonia, iron, and manganese. (2.9
mgd)Mr. Worrall the design and layout for this project
Trinity Center WTF Upgrade - Trinity Center, CA Mr. Worrall performed the 3D design and layout of the
upgrade and expansion of WTF from 0.25 to 0.41 mgd capacity. The slow sand filter was replaced with C/F
pressure filters, installation of new gaseous chlorine feed system, a new water storage tank and AMR water
meters.
Mammoth Community Services District Groundwater Treatment Plant Upgrades – Mammoth, CA WWE
prepared the preliminary design report for corrosion control improvements at two existing groundwater
treatment plants receiving water from 8 wells. Mr. Worrall performed the design and layout for upgrade of
first plant with new air strippers to raise pH, structural improvements to existing building, piping
modifications, new backwash recovery system, bolted steel clearwell replacement, and complete controls
upgrade (4.3 mgd).
North Lakeport Water System Plant, Lakeport - CA Mr. Worrall performed 3D design and layout of a 1-mgd
(expandable to 4-mgd) surface water treatment plant for the treatment of groundwater under the direct
influence of surface water. Incorporated packaged Microfiltration and GAC equipment models into 3D
design for seamless mechanical coordination.
Arroyo Vista Water Storage Tank and Booster Pump Station - Anthem, AZ Mr. Worrall performed 3D
design and layout of a 500,000 gallon steel tank reservoir and associated booster pump station to serve
Arroyo Vista community. Included hydraulic analysis, pump selection, facility design, integration with
existing water distribution system, and site development.
Longley Lane Arsenic Water Treatment Plant, Hidden Valley Water System - Washoe County, NV Mr.
Worrall performed 3D design layout of mechanical equipment including Pall microfiltration systems, solids
handling equipment, chemical area, and yard piping design and layout. Coordinated all technicians and
engineers. Prepared 3D renderings and fly-throughs for client and other agencies and stakeholders.
Page 3 of 3
City of Redding Foothill Water Treatment Plant - Redding, CA Mr. Worrall provided mechanical, chemical,
civil, and structural drawings of improvements to the City of Redding’s Foothill Water Treatment Plant (32-
mgd), including the following: Filter rehabilitation including new underdrains, air scour improvements, and
new media, filter to waste, backwash and air scour control valve replacements. Installation of a Recapture
Pump Station to recycle plant drainage Replacement of chlorine solution piping and chemical injectors and
site access improvements.
California Water Services Co., Lucerne Water Treatment Plant - Lucerne, CA Mr. Worrall provided
mechanical, chemical, civil, and structural drawings for the retrofit of the Lucerne WTP (1-mgd), including
chemical treatment improvements, raw water straining, Microfiltration, Advanced Oxidation Process and
Screw Press dewatering of residuals.
Indian Health Service New WTP, Campbell Ranch - Yerington, NV Mr. Worrall performed 3D design and
layout of a new 200 gpm water treatment plant to remove uranium with ion exchange and on-site resin
regeneration and to remove arsenic with adsorption media.
Indian Health Service New Well House Building - Battle Mountain, NV Mr. Worrall performed 3D design
and layout of a new well house building utilizing coagulation/microfiltration with ferric chloride and a Pall
Aria AP-3 Microfilter, a sodium hypochlorite disinfection system and pH adjustment equipment.
City of Willits WTP upgrade – Willits, CA (Lead CAAD Technician) Mr. Worrall provided mechanical and
chemical drawings for preparation of plans and specifications for improvements to an existing surface water
treatment plant that was experiencing violations of finished water quality standards for combined effluent
turbidity due to rapidly changing source water quality and inadequate raw water pretreatment
Redway Community Services District Water Treatment Plant Improvements - Redway, CA Mr. Worrall
performed 3D design layout of mechanical equipment Rehabilitation, Intake Pump Station replacement,
Backwash and filter-to-waste improvements, valve replacements, Booster Pump Station replacement, and a
new 450,000 gallon Water Storage Tank.
Walker River Arsenic Removal WTP - Schurz, NV Mr. Worrall performed 3D design and layout of a 1-mgd
coagulation/microfiltration facility for the removal of arsenic from drinking water for the Walker River
Paiute Tribe in Schurz, NV. Raw water chemistry including up to 100 ug/L arsenic. Treatment system
consisted of ferric chloride addition, microfiltration, post-treatment pH adjustment with sodium hydroxide,
disinfection with sodium hypochlorite and finished water pumping. Incorporated packaged Microfiltration
equipment model into 3D design for seamless mechanical coordination.
Arsenic Removal Water Treatment Plant - Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribe Fallon, NV (Lead CADD
Technician) Mr. Worrall performed 3D design layout of mechanical equipment including Pall microfiltration
systems, solids handling equipment, chemical area, and yard piping design and layout. Coordinated all
technicians and engineers. Prepared 3D renderings and fly-throughs for client and other agencies and
stakeholders.
Geysers Recharge Project - Santa Rosa, CA Mr. Worrall provided mechanical, chemical, civil, and structural
drawings for the project, which included three new pump stations, each with 5 pumps, and 41 miles of 30-
and 48-inch welded steel pipeline to convey recycled water to the Geysers Steamfield for injection to
recharge the steamfield for electric power generation. All submittals were presented in 3D renderings, walk-
throughs, and bubble views, meeting USACE standards.
Stephanie Standerfer – Senior Project Manager
Stephanie Standerfer is a senior project manager with over 16 EDUCATION

years’ professional experience as an environmental planner, Washington State University, Pullman
specializing in managing large California Environmental Quality MS, Environmental Science, 1997
Act (CEQA) projects for both public and private projects. Ms. University of California, Riverside
Standerfer has managed large project and program BS, Environmental Science, 1995
environmental impact reports (EIRs) for water districts, cities, PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
and private developers. Her breadth of project experience
Association of Environmental
allows her to foresee and navigate challenges that inevitably Professionals
arise during CEQA compliance. She is an expert in CEQA
City of Riverside Cultural Heritage
implementation in the Inland Empire, and she has provided Board, Chair (2003–2011)
training in CEQA processing to local agencies.
Ms. Standerfer currently serves as extension of staff to the Western Riverside County Regional
Conservation Authority (RCA), the entity responsible for implementation of the Multiple Species
Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). As contract staff to the RCA, Ms. Standerfer provides ongoing
processing, review, and consultation on implementation procedures and policies. Ms. Standerfer
provides training and policy guidance documents to not only the RCA but all Permittees, which
includes all 17 cities and the County of Riverside. Ms. Standerfer’s experience with the RCA has
given her a strong understanding of the regulatory agencies and how to anticipate issues before they
arise.
Ms. Standerfer’s interdisciplinary background is reflected by her experience managing the production
of general plan updates, specific plans, planning studies, environmental constraints analyses, air quality
impact studies, health risk assessments, noise studies, biological resource surveys, and cultural
resource studies. As the project manager on a variety of controversial public works and private
development projects over the years, she has managed teams of subconsultants, engineers, and
architects, and she enjoys the interaction and coordination involved in these types of projects.
Ms. Standerfer’s reputation as a CEQA authority has also led to her peer reviewing CEQA
documents, including EIRs. She develops excellent working relationships with her clients to assist
them in navigating the intricacies of environmental regulatory compliance.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Dawson Canyon Pipeline Project, Lee Lake Water District (LLWD), Riverside,
California. As project manager, oversaw the technical and CEQA analysis for a Mitigated Negative
Declaration for the construction of a new recycled water pipeline and associated water storage tank
to service LLWD’s existing customers and reduce reliability on potable water sources. Evaluation of
historic oak trees along the roadway alignments was necessary, as well as consideration of
construction methods to avoid existing utility resources and jurisdictional waters.
Site 31 Effluent Pipeline, Western Municipal Water District (WMWD), Riverside,

California. As the environmental project manager, worked closely with WMWD and March Air
Reserve Base (MARB) to complete the CEQA process for a water pipeline conveyance from treatment
facilities at MARB to the Riverside National Cemetery for irrigation purposes. The environmental
component of the project involved completion, circulation, response to comments, and lead agency
adoption of an MND covering several jurisdictions. Project challenges included numerous stakeholders
and an abbreviated schedule in order to meet Proposition 13 funding requirements.
DUDEK Page 1 of 2
S TE P H A N I E S T A N D E RFE R – C ON TI N UE D
Ion Exchange Facility, Jurupa Community Services District (JCSD), Riverside, California.
Prepared a negative declaration for JCSD on their adopted ion exchange facility project. The ion
exchange facility is a crucial project for JCSD as it will remove currently elevated levels of nitrates
from groundwater resources within the Chino Basin. Worked closely with District engineers and
JCSD to complete the CEQA process in an expeditious manner.
Snow Valley Annexation, Crestline Lake Arrowhead Water Agency, San Bernardino,
California. Served as the project manager for this controversial EIR. The proposed project included
an approximately 2.5-mile-long pipeline to convey water to a local ski resort on National Forest
lands for snowmaking purposes. A portion of the water line was to be constructed above ground and
traverse undisturbed forest land, a portion owned by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest
Service. Controversial issues included water availability, water quality, impacts to Deep Creek and its
fishery, impacts on southern rubber boa (Charina umbratica), and the growth inducement potential of
the project. Additional issues considered in the EIR included impacts to aesthetics in the forest and
recreational versus local mountain quality of life issues.
Lakeland Village Master Drainage Plan Program EIR, Riverside County Flood Control
and Water Conservation District, Riverside, California. Project manager on the preparation
of a program EIR for the District’s Lakeland Village Master Drainage Plan. Master drainage plans are
long-term planning documents that identify facilities and locations for future storm drain
infrastructure. The storm drain facilities will be built over 10 to 30 years; therefore, a program EIR
will be prepared to outline the environmental analysis and framework for future mitigation that may
be needed when a specific facility is to be constructed. As part of our scope of services, Dudek first
prepared an environmental constraints analysis report so that the District could identify its preferred
alternative.
General Plan EIR, City of Riverside, California. Manage the recirculation of the City’s General
Plan EIR. On an extremely tight schedule, our EIR team was responsible for assessing the
shortcomings of the previously circulated EIR document and conducting new analysis to bring the
recirculated EIR into compliance with CEQA. Managing this EIR effort took a tremendous amount of
knowledge of the local area, CEQA expertise, and understanding the concerns of local stakeholders
to help the City complete a legally defensible EIR.
Gless Ranch EIR, City of Riverside, California. Serves as the project manager for the
preparation of an EIR for a 40-acre commercial development located in the City of Riverside. The
site is currently occupied by an orange grove and a citrus stand. The proposed 420,000-square-foot
development will include a Target, a home improvement center, and other retail/commercial uses.
The existing citrus stand will be remodeled and incorporated into the proposed project. Dudek’s
scope of work includes air and noise studies, a phase 1 cultural resources survey, and a biological
technical report with MSHCP compliance, and incorporation of prepared technical reports for traffic
and urban decay.
Industrial Warehouse EIRs, Riverside County, California. In a 7-year period, managed and
authored five EIRs for various private developers in Riverside County for industrial big-box
warehouses. She authored one of the first EIRs in the County of Riverside to address the health
impacts of diesel exhaust within the context of CEQA. Each of these EIRs required extensive
amounts of coordination between the local environmental activist groups, the South Coast Air
Quality Management District, and the lead agency. Her experience and expertise in leading the
analysis on health impacts from diesel exhaust provided each of her clients with documents that
were legally defensible and technically accurate.
DUDEK Page 2 of 2
Shabnam Dilmaghani, PhD, PE – Air Quality Specialist
Shabnam Dilmaghani is an air quality specialist with over 6 EDUCATION

years’ professional experience as an environmental engineer University of Southern California,
specializing in air quality and local, state, and federal regulatory Los Angeles
compliance, including the California Environmental Quality Act PhD, Environmental Engineering, 2007
(CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Ms. MS, Environmental Engineering, Energy
Dilmaghani’s experience includes air quality and health risk and the Environment, 2005
assessments, air dispersion modeling, and greenhouse gas Azad University, Tehran, Iran
(GHG) emissions inventories. MS, Environmental Engineering, Air
Pollution, 1999
RELEVANT PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE Sharif University of Technology,
Tehran, Iran
Senior Atmospheric Scientist, First Carbon Solutions, BS, Applied Engineering Physics, 1995
Irvine, California. Managed projects, including writing CERTIFICATIONS
proposals and scope of works, coordinating with clients, and Licensed Professional Engineer in
tracking budgets and schedules. Evaluated air quality and health Mechanical Engineering, State of California
risk assessments associated with CEQA and NEPA. The CPR and First Aid, American Red Cross
projects have included residential, commercial, and mixed-use Hazardous Waste Operations and
land uses located in Northern and Southern California. Emergency Response, HAZWOPER
Analyses involved air emissions inventories (criteria, toxic air Quality Management System Internal
contaminants (TACs) / hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), and Auditor Training Course (ISO 9000), SGS
GHGs), air dispersion modeling such as ISC and AERMOD, and Environmental Management System
cancer and non-cancer risk assessments. Internal Auditor Training Course
(ISO 14000), SGS
Air Science Group Senior Associate, ENVIRON PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
International Corporation, Irvine, California. Evaluated
Air and Waste Management
air quality and climate change impacts, including the Association, Member
preparation of complex air emissions inventories (e.g.,
Sharif University of Technology
criteria, toxics, and GHGs), air dispersion modeling such as Association (Iran), Board Member
ISC and AERMOD, and risk evaluations in support of CEQA
Engineering Graduate Student
environmental impact report (EIR) requirements. The Association (USC), Board Member
projects have included transportation, oil/gas, residential,
Iranian Grad. Student Association
commercial, mixed-use, renewable energy, and industrial land (USC), President
uses typically exceeding 300 acres. Evaluated the
transportation conformity for quantitative particulate matter (PM) hot-spot, including the
preparation of complex air emissions inventories, and air dispersion modeling in support of the
NEPA. Managed and prepared Title V monitoring and compliance reports for a variety of
industries in South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), and assisted facilities
in creating compliance matrices to track compliance with district and federal rules. Conducted
GHG emissions inventory for commercial and residential developments, which involved
developing GHG inventories for various aspects of the development activities (i.e.,
construction, energy consumption, mobile sources, vegetation change, and municipal sources),
summarizing the current state of science and regulatory settings, presenting mitigation options,
and evaluating the significance of impact of development emissions. Managed and prepared
numerous air quality permit applications for various equipment operated in a number of states.
Applications have included best available control technology (BACT) analysis, SCREEN3, health
risk assessment, RADIUS, and states’ environmental rule analysis, where applicable.
DUDEK Page 1 of 2
S H A B N AM D I L M A G HA N I , P H D, PE – C O N TI N UE D
Consulted various facilities to maintain compliance with SCAQMD rules and regulations and
conducted SCAQMD annual emission reports. Performed data analysis and studied the impact of
the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for industrial boilers and process
heaters (boiler maximum achievable control technology (MACT)) in several facilities. Project
included cost effectiveness analysis for MACT control systems. Supervised source tests to ensure
accuracy and compliance with methodology and rule requirements associated with gas-fired boilers
and process heaters. Provided technical supports for litigation projects.
Environmental Engineer Intern, Morgan & Associate Inc., Los Alamitos, California.
Developed methodologies and procedures for the remediation of a former ARCO station involving
groundwater stripping/treatment, vapor extraction / sparging tests, and high-vacuum dual-phase
(HVDP) tests. Conducted site remediation pilot tests, data reduction, report preparation, and
other required fieldwork for environmental surveys.
Environmental Consultant for the Quality Control Division, Electric Power Research
Company (MATN), Tehran, Iran. Managed the implementation of the Environmental
Management System (EMS-ISO 14001) in a power plant, first of its kind in the country.
Supervised and implemented the Quality Management System (QMS-ISO 9002) in large-scale
operations, such as gas distribution companies and power plants. Led workshops and training
courses for more than 3,500 employees.
Environmental Engineer, Tehran Behzist Company, Tehran, Iran. Designed air

purification systems for food industries and residential buildings.
Research
Spectral Analyses of Air Quality Data, University of Southern California, Los Angeles,
California. Implemented and developed the Lomb-Scargle periodogram approach for air quality
data to quantify and characterize the periodic behavior of every species represented on the air
quality measurements. Quantified the relative importance of daily, weekly, and seasonal variability.
Characterized the periodicities in time series of air pollutants.
Indoor Air Pollution Analysis in High-Rise Buildings, Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Analyzed the indoor and outdoor air pollution in different levels of a high-rise building. Evaluated
the correlation of indoor/outdoor air pollution and investigated its variation in different levels, due
to the wind direction and structure of the building. Examined the microbial growth in the heating,
ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system and its distribution through the building.
Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran. Designed and manufactured a vacuum system,
which was used in producing super conductors in the Magnetic Research Laboratories.
Computer Skills
• Proficient in AERMOD, ISCST3, CalEEMod, and SCREEN3
• Advanced at GIS, EMFAC, OFFROAD, URBEMIS, RADIUS, and MATLAB
• Very good at AERSCREEN and UNMIX
• Familiar with EDMS, CAL3QHCR, HARP, PMF, and ME2
• Proficient in Microsoft Office applications such as Excel, Access, PowerPoint, and Word
DUDEK Page 2 of 2
Mike Greene, INCE – Environmental Specialist /Acoustician
Mike Greene is an environmental specialist/acoustician with more EDUCATION

than 23 years’ professional experience in acoustical analysis and University of California, San Diego
noise control engineering. Mr. Greene has conducted and BS, Applied Mechanics, 1985
participated in noise and vibration analyses for hundreds of CERTIFICATIONS
transportation, commercial, industrial, and residential Board Certified, Institute of Noise
developments throughout California and the United States. Control Engineering (INCE Bd. Cert.)
As a project or task manager, Mr. Greene has conducted noise County of San Diego–Approved
studies for industrial and commercial facilities, ranging from PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
hospitals to manufacturing plants to super-speedway facilities. Transportation Research Board, ADC40
He is experienced in the modeling of existing and future Subcommittee
roadway noise impacts using the Federal Highway
Administration's Traffic Noise Model (TNM®) and is experienced with the use of both SoundPLAN
and CadnaA, computer software programs for prediction and assessment of noise levels in the
vicinity of industrial facilities and other noise sources such as roadways, railways and airports.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
New Evans Reservoir 1S/MND, Public Utilities Department, City of Riverside, California.
Responsible for the measurement, analysis, and reporting of noise for this IS/MND. The primary
issue for this project with respect to noise was construction (trenching) along the pipeline
alignment adjacent to noise-sensitive land receptors.
Otay Mesa Recycled Water System Capital Improvement Project EIR, Otay Water
District, Otay Mesa, California. Responsible for the noise analysis for this ongoing project
involving the construction of three recycled water pipelines by the Otay Water District. The
potential effect of noise from construction activities was the primary issue with regard to noise
for this project. Noise levels at adjacent noise-sensitive uses were predicted and compared
with relevant thresholds of significance, and mitigation measures were recommended as
necessary to reduce noise to a level below significance.
Rider Distribution Warehouse Technical Studies and EIR, Aiere Property Group,
Riverside County, California. Responsible for noise measurement, analysis, and reporting of
potential effects on the noise environment from the project. Construction noise (which included
potential rock blasting) and operational noise from warehouse and truck operations were
addressed for this project which was located near a nature preserve area and residences.
Lake Skinner Solar Project—Metropolitan Water District, Riverside County, California.

Task Manager, Noise. Conducted the noise study for the IS/MND for this project, located in
Riverside County. The primary issue with respect to noise was potential effects at adjacent
residences from construction activities associated with the proposed project.
1-15 Widening from San Bernardino to 1-215 EIR/EIS, Transportation Commission,
County of Riverside, California. Potential noise increases at adjacent noise-sensitive land
uses were addressed pursuant to Federal Highway Administration and Caltrans guidelines.
Noise measurements were conducted at representative noise-sensitive land uses along the
43.5- mile project alignment. Noise modeling (TNM® Version 2.5) was conducted in order to
assess the changes in future traffic noise levels resulting from the proposed improvements, to
determine existing and future traffic noise impacts and to provide noise abatement design
guidance as needed. The results of the noise study were summarized in a noise study report
DUDEK Page 1 of 2
M I K E G RE E N E , INCE – C ON TI N UE D
and noise abatement decision report pursuant to Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement (TeNS)
and noise protocol guidance.
Sunroad East Harbor Island Hotel Draft Environmental Impact EIR and Port Master
Plan Amendment, Port of San Diego, San Diego, California. Served as task manager to
conduct a noise analysis that included noise measurements, on-site and off-site traffic and
construction noise impact assessment, in addition to other on-site operational noises, such as
Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC), parking lots, etc., and effects from nearby San
Diego International Airport. The results of the analysis were summarized in a technical report and
in the noise section of the EIR.
Tejon Mountain Village EIR, Tejon Ranch Company, Tejon, California. Conducted the
noise analysis for the EIR for Tejon Mountain Village, a proposed resort community located near
the Grapevine, in northern Los Angeles County. Noise measurements of existing ambient noise
levels were conducted in the vicinity of the Interstate (I-) 5 freeway as well as in the more
remote portions of the project site. Traffic noise was modeled using the TNM® noise model.
Additionally, potential for noise impacts from a distant sand and gravel mine was assessed, as well
as from construction noise of the project itself.
State Route (SR-) 2 Freeway Terminus IS/Environmental Assessment (EA), Metro,
Los Angeles, California. As part of this joint National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)/California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) document, the project was analyzed at an equal level of detail for
the No Action alternative and all five project alternatives. The analyses were conducted in
accordance with guidelines set forth in the Caltrans Traffic Noise Protocol and TeNS handbooks.
The study included noise measurements of ambient conditions adjacent to the project alignment,
traffic noise impact analysis (using TNM® Version 2.5) to estimate potential noise effects at existing
noise-sensitive receptors, and noise during construction. Results were summarized in a noise study
report pursuant to Caltrans TeNS guidance.
Northern Canoga Extension of the Orange Line EIR, Metro, Reseda, California.
Project entailed noise measurements and subsequent noise analysis of Metro bus operations on
rubberized asphalt concrete (RAC) and non-RAC busway pavement to determine the benefit
provided by RAC. Because differences in the noise levels were not expected to be substantial and
because of site conditions, the design of the measurement setups was crucial. Site selection and
details of the measurement procedures, including coordination of a dedicated test bus and driver,
was an important part of the study. Simultaneous measurements at multiple locations were
conducted from approximately 1 a.m. to 4 a.m. to reduce the influence of background noise.
Noise measurement methodology, analysis results, and conclusions were summarized in a technical
memorandum to the client.
EIR for Campus Master Plan and Student Housing, California State University,
Dominguez Hills, Carson, California. Responsible for the completion of the noise analysis
and reporting for the project. Supervised the noise measurements, modeling, analysis and
results reporting, which involved analysis of potential effects from traffic, on-campus facilities,
and operations and construction noise.
Weymouth Filtration Plant Solar Project, Metropolitan Water District, La Verne, California.
Conducted the noise study for the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for
this project. The primary issue with respect to noise from the project was potential effects at
nearby residences and other land uses from construction activities associated with the
proposed project.
DUDEK Page 2 of 2
Micah Hale, PhD, RPA – Senior Archaeologist
Micah Hale is Dudek’s cultural resources practice manager and EDUCATION

lead principal investigator, with technical expertise as a lithic and University of California, Davis
groundstone analyst, invertebrate analyst, and in ground PhD, Anthropology, 2009
penetrating radar. Over the course of his 18 year career, Dr. California State University, Sacramento
Hale has served as a principal investigator in the public and MA, Anthropology, 2001
private sector for all levels of archaeological investigation, as a University of California, Davis
public outreach coordinator and as an assistant professor at the BS, Anthropology, 1996
University of California, Davis (U.C. Davis). As Dudek’s cultural CERTIFICATIONS
resources practice manager, he currently functions as a principal
Register of Professional Archaeologists
investigator in project oversight including proposals, research
(RPA), 2001
designs, fieldwork, artifact analysis, and report authorship.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Dr. Hale’s experience is both academic and professional Society for American Archaeology
spanning California, Arizona, Nevada, and Oregon, including Society for California Archaeology
work for Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) Antelope Valley Archaeological Society
Southwest, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), San Diego Archaeological Society
Western Area Power Administration, Bureau of Land
Management (BLM), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS), California State Parks, various city and county agencies, and directly for Native American
groups. Dr. Hale has supervised numerous large-scale surveys, test excavations, data recovery
programs, and geoarchaeological investigations, served as a third party review consultant, and an
expert witness in legal proceedings. He has authored research designs, management and treatment
plans, proposals, preliminary and final reports, and technical analyses. Dr. Hale has integrated his
personal research interests into projects and participated in professional symposia at local and
national venues, including the Society for American Archaeology and the Society for California
Archaeology. Additionally, he has conducted academic research in the Polar Arctic, Greenland. Dr.
Hale’s current focus is on hunter-gatherer archaeology of California and the Great Basin, applying
theoretical premises of cultural evolution and human behavioral ecology.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Lee Lake Cultural Resources Inventory, Lee Lake Water District, Riverside County,
California. As project manager, supervised Dudek’s principal investigator to coordinate and
implement cultural resources inventory for the construction of a new pipeline and water storage
facility.
Imperial Irrigation District’s Phase II Testing, Imperial Irrigation District, Imperial

County, California. As field director, supervised Phase II testing of eight sites in the Colorado
Desert. Managed field crews, conducted test excavations, and prepared site documentation and
portions of the technical report.
Poseidon Resources Desalination Plant and Pipeline Wetland Mitigation

Archaeological Evaluation, City of San Diego, San Diego County, California. As project
manager and principal investigator, developed methods and strategies to evaluate archaeological
deposits most likely related to the 1782 ethnohistoric Kumeyaay village of La Punta located within
the wetland mitigation area. Project included geotechnical coring and backhoe exploration to locate
and evaluate buried archaeological deposits Duties included assistance provided to the USFWS for
NAGPRA consultation and implementation.
DUDEK Page 1 of 2
M I CA H H A L E , P H D, RPA – C ON TI N UE D
San Clemente Water Recycling Monitoring, City of San Clemente, Orange County,
California. As project manager, supervised Dudek’s principal investigator to coordinate
archaeological, tribal, and paleontological mitigation monitoring associated with the construction of
a new water conveyance pipeline. Duties include preparation of a discovery and treatment plan.
Lake Murray Survey, City of San Diego Metropolitan Wastewater Department, La

Mesa, San Diego County, California. As field director, conducted survey of proposed trunk
sewer replacement in La Mesa. Prepared portions of the technical report.
Poseidon Resources Desalination Plant and Pipeline Monitoring, City of Carlsbad, San
Diego County, California. As project manager, supervised Dudek’s principal investigator to
coordinate archaeological, tribal, and paleontological mitigation monitoring associated with the
construction of the desalination plant and a new water conveyance pipeline. Duties include
preparation of a discovery and treatment plan and evaluation of archaeological discoveries.
Data Recovery Excavations at the Ridge Hill Facilities Site (SDI-18472), Padre Dam
Municipal Water District (PDMWD), San Diego County, California. As principal
investigator, supervised data recovery of a complex late prehistoric habitation site.
San Clemente Canyon Survey, City of San Diego Metropolitan Wastewater

Department, City of San Diego, San Diego County, California. As principal investigator
and field director, supervised and conducted an intensive pedestrian survey of proposed access
road maintenance for the San Clemente Canyon sewer line. Two cultural resources were
identified. Conducted site documentation, prepared sites forms and technical report. Managed
survey crew member.
Carmel Valley Archaeological Monitoring, City of San Diego Metropolitan

Wastewater Department, Carmel Valley, San Diego County, California. As field monitor
for pre-trenching for placement of sewer line, conducted monitoring and wrote portions of
technical report.
Data Recovery of Locus O, Star Canyon Development, Agua Caliente Band of

Cahuilla Indians, Palm Springs, Riverside County, California. As field director,
supervised field crews for data recovery mitigation of an archaeological deposit and human
remains near Tahquitz Canyon. Coordinated with Native American representatives and prepared
portions of the technical report.
Mitigative Screening, Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, Palm Springs, Riverside
County, California. As field director, supervised archaeological mitigation of an impacted burial
site on the Agua Caliente Reservation. Prepared mapping of the project, coordinated field efforts
with Tribal representatives, oversaw monitoring of the project, and prepared portions of the
technical report.
Class III Cultural Resources Inventory for the Level 3 Fiber Optic Installation Project,
Fort Irwin Army Reserve and BLM, San Bernardino County, California. As Project
manager and co-principal investigator, oversaw and implemented cultural resource inventory of
fiber optic corridor and recordation and evaluation of contributing elements to the NRHP-eligible
LADWP transmission line corridor.
DUDEK Page 2 of 2
Brock Ortega – Principal, Senior Wildlife Biologist
Brock Ortega has over 21 years’ experience as a wildlife EDUCATION

biologist. He brings extensive expertise to his project teams in Humboldt State University
many areas, including mitigation monitoring, permitting issues BS, Wildlife Biology and Management, 1991
related to wetland resources and threatened or endangered CERTIFICATIONS
species, wildlife biology and management, ecological assessment, USFWS Federal 10a Survey Permit No.
environmental impact assessment and mitigation, habitat TE-813545-5:
remediation, endangered species management plan authorship, • California Gnatcatcher Surveys
and project management. Mr. Ortega has conducted over • Least Bell’s Vireo Surveys/Nest
20,000 hours of focused and general wildlife surveys during his Monitoring
professional career. • Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Surveys
• Quino Checkerspot Butterfly Surveys
Mr. Ortega is a recognized qualified surveyor for a number of • Fairy Shrimp Surveys
listed and rare amphibian and mammal species and has federal
permits for several species. He is U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mohave Ground Squirrel (Spermophilus
(USFWS)–authorized as an arroyo toad (Bufo californicus) (Xerospermophilus) mohavensis) Chief
emergency handler; USFWS and California Department of Fish Survey Permit
and Game (CDFG)–qualified to survey San Joaquin kit fox PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
(Vulpes macrotis mutica) throughout its range; and USFWS and American Ornithologists’ Union
U.S. Forest Service (USFS)–qualified to survey arroyo toad, Association of Field Ornithologists
California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii), mountain yellow- Cooper Ornithological Society
legged frog (Rana muscosa), and Coachella Valley fringe-toed Wilson Ornithological Society
lizard (Uma inornata) throughout their ranges. The Wildlife Society
Southern California Chapter of The Wildlife
PROJECT EXPERIENCE Society, Board Member
Multiple Projects, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District,
Riverside County, California. Served as project manager for multiple projects. The projects
ranged from multiple-acre detention basins to long and linear conveyance projects. Responsible for
conducting biological studies, reporting, mitigation and monitoring plan writing, and wetland
permitting. Recently completed two projects that involved widening existing channels in the Salt
Creek and Perris Valley areas: 4- and 2-mile-long study areas, respectively. These projects involved
conducting biological studies (i.e., vegetation mapping, wetland delineations, and focused surveys for
California gnatcatcher, least Bell’s vireo, southwestern willow flycatcher, arroyo toad, Quino
checkerspot, and sensitive plants), relocating burrowing owls, reporting, and assisting with resource
agency permitting as required. Many of the projects required coordination with resource agencies.
San Diego Pipeline No. 6, Metropolitan Water District (MWD) of Southern California,
Riverside and San Diego Counties, California. The project consisted of a 30-mile-long, 9-
foot-diameter water conveyance pipeline. Began work on this project as a project monitor, with
responsibilities including conducting habitat assessments for at least 10 federally and state-listed
plant and wildlife species, conducting biological studies, coordinating monitoring activities, and
monitoring site investigations for the early project activities. Transitioned into project manager for
the approximately $1.5-million contract, and was responsible for providing environmental support
services to the MWD necessary to support revised environmental documents for the pipeline. All
tasks for this contract met aggressive scheduling requirements and were within budget.
As-Needed Contract, Eastern Municipal Water District, Riverside County, California.

Served as monitoring biologist and primary biologist. These projects required Stephens’ kangaroo
DUDEK Page 1 of 2
Shelah Riggs – Senior Regulatory Specialist/Projec t Manager
Shelah Riggs is an accomplished project manager with 12 years’ EDUCATION

experience in preparing California Environmental Quality Act California State University, Fullerton
and National Environmental Policy Act (CEQA/NEPA)
MS, Environmental Studies, 2002
documents and regulatory compliance documents under the
California State University, Fullerton
Clean Water Act (CWA), Sections 404 and 401; the federal
BA, Geography, 1998
Endangered Species Act (ESA), Sections 7 and 10; California
Coastal Act; California State Porter-Cologne Act; California CERTIFICATIONS
ESA (CESA); and California Fish and Game Code Sections Wetland Training Institute
1600–1616. Ms. Riggs has conducted numerous wetlands and  Certificate in Wetland Delineation,
streambed delineations in accordance with the U.S. Army Corps April 2003
of Engineers (ACOE) 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual and  Certificate in Plant ID, June 2005
Arid West Region Supplement methodology throughout PSMJ Resources Inc., Project Manager’s
Southern California. She maintains an excellent rapport with Boot camp, 2002 and 2004
resource agency staff and has successfully negotiated and PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
assisted in implementing favorable mitigation conditions for a Association of Environmental
variety of public and private projects located within Professionals
environmentally sensitive areas. Ms. Riggs has provided Society of Wetland Scientists
regulatory compliance training through the University of
California Native Plant Society
California, Los Angeles Extension Service, as well as client-
customized training for Southern California Edison (SCE), San Diego County Water Authority
(SDCWA), and the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Limonite Storm Channel Maintenance Agreement, Riverside County Land

Management, Riverside, California. Served as project manager for this project; helped with
preparation of technical studies and obtaining a 5-year agreement with ACOE and CDFG to allow
Riverside County to conduct maintenance activities within the Limonite Storm Channel, which
discharges directly to the Santa Ana River. Delayed maintenance resulted in significant flooding of
an adjacent golf course and horse ranch. Key issues involved potential impacts to migratory water
birds and the federally listed Santa Ana Sucker (Catostomus santaanae), least Bell’s vireo, and
southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus).
Carryover Storage and San Vicente Dam Raise Project EIR/Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS), San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA), San Diego,
California. As permits coordinator, provided liaison and coordination with the EIS federal lead
agency, ACOE, and prepared all permit applications for the project, including the 404(b)(1)
Alternatives Analysis. Responsible for assisting ACOE with preparing all NEPA notices, reviewing
technical reports, and expediting approvals. Ms. Riggs was asked to fill this role based upon her
excellent relationship with ACOE staff in Los Angeles and San Diego. Additionally, SCDWA
requested that she present a white paper on the NEPA and 404 implications of the project at the
U.S. Dam Engineers Conference in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on their behalf.
Joint Outfall System Master Facilities Plan Project, Los Angeles County Sanitation
District, Los Angeles, California. Served as regulatory compliance task lead for ICF in preparing a
joint EIS/EIR, providing a regulatory permitting plan and schedule, and obtaining environmental permits
for the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County Joint Outfall System Master Facilities Plan.
The plan will address the need for additional capacity, including the construction and operation of a new
DUDEK Page 1 of 2
S HE LA H R I GG S – C O N TI N UE D
tunnel and ocean outfall system and expansion of the water reclamation plants and sewerage
conveyance system. The project will involve authorization under Section 401 and 404 of the CWA,
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code, and California
Coastal Act. Additionally, consultation will be required to document project compliance under ESA
Section 7, CESA, the Marine Mammal Protection Act, and Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act. In addition, Mr. Riggs prepared a thorough regulatory permit plan detailing all the
permits required for this complex project, the triggers for each permit, and the timing, and was
responsible for obtaining all regulatory permits for the project as the design of the project progressed.
CEQA, Regulatory Permitting, Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat

Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Review On-Call Services, County of Riverside, California.
As project manager since 2006, conducted reviews during the plan-check phase of approval for
Riverside County Flood Control projects, as a subconsultant to Bureau Veritas, which included
construction, modification, or other work within flood control facilities. The reviews evaluated
project compliance with CEQA and ensured that each project conformed to the District’s
requirements for permits under Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Act, Section 404 and 401 of
the CWA, and the Western Riverside MSHCP requirements. To date, has received and/or
completed the following task orders:
 Task Order No. 1 – Tract 30850. Environmental review for project that involved work
within the Perris Valley Channel System. This project required additional coordination to
ensure that the 1602 Operation by Law letter included verbiage required by Flood Control
that would allow for long-term maintenance activities within the channel.
 Task Order No.2 – Tract 30921. Environmental review for project that involved work
within the Quincy Street Channel. This project required additional coordination to ensure
that the focused surveys required under the MSHCP for the project were conducted.
within the Romoland Master Drainage Plan (MDP) Line A-2. This project required
additional review of the landscaping and maintenance plan for a grass-lined channel to be
constructed by the applicant and dedicated to the District.
within the Moreno Valley MDP Area. This project required additional review and
coordination to ensure that the 401 Water Quality Certification and the 404 Nationwide
Permits were amended by the RWQCB and ACOE, respectively, to address construction,
operation, and future maintenance of the facility to be constructed.
 Task Order No. 5 – Tract 31968. Environmental review for the Springs Commercial
Center. This project required documentation review to ensure that the requirements of
the Coachella Valley MSHCP were met.
 Task Order No 6 – Tract 32702. Environmental review for Stormwind Ranch at Oak
Valley. This project required additional review and coordination to ensure that the
MSHCP requirements for focused biological surveys for Narrow Endemic Plant Species
(NEPSSA 8- Allium marvinii and Dudleya multicaulis), burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), and
riparian birds (least Bell’s vireo, southwestern willow flycatcher, and yellow-billed cuckoo
(Coccyzus americanus)) were met.
DUDEK Page 2 of 2
B R OCK O R TE G A – C ON TI N UE D
rat, Quino checkerspot, and California gnatcatcher surveys and monitoring. These projects were
situated throughout western Riverside County.
Non-Potable Water Distribution System, Yucaipa Valley Water District, San

Bernardino and Riverside Counties, California. Served as lead biologist for wildlife studies
within San Timoteo Canyon. Responsibilities included scheduling personnel and conducting focused
surveys for arroyo toad, least Bell’s vireo, and southwestern willow flycatcher. Overall, 39 person-
days were required to complete these focused surveys along the approximately 7-mile alignment.
As-Needed Contract, City of San Diego Engineering and Capital Projects Department
and Water Utilities Department, San Diego County, California. Completed
environmental impact studies for several sewer and storm drain projects under the City of San
Diego as-needed contract. Wrote several mitigation monitoring plans and processed
documentation for CEQA compliance. Personally managed approximately 8 of the 80 projects.
As-Needed Biological Services 2000–2005, San Diego Metropolitan Wastewater

Department, City of San Diego, California. Served as primary biologist. Responsibilities
included conducting habitat assessments and focused surveys for arroyo toad, California
gnatcatcher, least Bell’s vireo, southwestern willow flycatcher, fairy shrimp, and other species.
Tributary Areas 3 and 8 Environmental Monitoring, U.S. Marine Corps Base Camp
Pendleton, San Diego County, California. Served as project manager and primary biologist.
Implemented categorical exclusion permit requirements supporting installation of an upgraded
sewer system over a portion of the base. This required writing a monitoring and compliance plan;
initiating habitat assessments over portions of the system which had the potential to affect least
Bell’s vireo, California gnatcatcher, and arroyo toad; and monitoring activities on a regular basis in
accordance with the monitoring plan.
Retrofit Project, Palm Springs Aerial Tramway, Riverside County, California. Managed
the biological resources portion of this project, which proposed to install new larger trams. The new
tram cars required rock and tree removal adjacent to the tram alignment to ensure safe usage. Initial
tasks included conducting focused surveys for mountain yellow-legged frog and golden eagle (Aquila
chrysaetos), vegetation mapping, reporting, and coordination with the resource agencies. Was later
responsible for determining the best way to convey peninsular bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis
cremnobates) across the Tram Road and onto the adjacent alluvial fan. This required interviewing
numerous state, federal, academic, and field bighorn sheep biologists, devising alternative methods to
avoid impacts to sheep, determining likely sheep crossing points, determining potential habitat bridge
locations, and submitting a synopsis report.
Mountain View IV Wind Energy EIR/EIS Project, City of Palm Springs/Bureau of Land
Management, Riverside, California. Served as lead project biologist for the project. Dudek
prepared a joint EIR/EIS for the City of Palm Springs and the BLM. The project consists of two
development options for a 1,659-acre site. The first development option consists of 49 1,000-
kilowatt (kW) turbines. The second includes 58 850 kW turbines. Both alternatives involve the
installation of support facilities, including gravel-surfaced access roads, an electrical substation, and
an electrical transmission line to connect the turbines to the substation. The project also included a
compatibility analysis with the recently adopted Coachella Valley Multi-Species Conservation Plan.
The project site is within the City of Palm Springs corporate boundaries; however, the western half
of the project site is composed of BLM land, and the eastern half is private land under the
management of the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD).
DUDEK Page 2 of 2
Tom Holmberg, PLS
Project Manager
YEARS WITH ANDREGG – 10
PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS
California Professional Land Surveyor # 7363 - Since1997
EXPERIENCE
Mr. Holmberg is a California Licensed Land Surveyor with 26 years experience working as a Project
Manager, Project Surveyor, and Party Chief. He has completed a variety of challenging projects that
currently include Project Manager for large scale projects at LAX, the Port of LA and various Metro
projects. Past experience also includes providing surveying services for high-rise buildings, power plants,
wastewater treatment facilities and large-scale pipeline projects. Mr. Holmberg is experienced in control
surveys for large scale mapping projects, topographic surveys, boundary and right of way acquisitions,
As-Built surveys and first order vertical monitoring surveys.
Design Survey for Cal Water Wells 203 & 298, Carson, CA
Project Manager for a topographic survey of well sites 203 & 298. Mr. Holmberg’s team located all surface
visible utilities and measured invert elevations of manhole and drain inlets that were accessible. All
drainage swales, grade brakes, permanent improvements such as pavement and curbs were surveyed.
Prime: Waterworks Engineers.
Design Survey for Battle Mountain WTP Site, Nevada

Project Manager for surveying responsible for performing a topographic survey of the site requested, set
new control using assumed datum and located street improvements or found property corners to
establish a record land net for parcels. Prime: Waterworks Engineers.
Mayhew Levee Raising and Drain Project, Sacramento, CA

Project Manager responsible for providing pre-construction cross sections, recovering and checking
existing control for the project. Additional tasks included construction staking and extending existing
cross sections for the levee-raising project past the south limit of the Mayhew Drain closure structure and
across Mayhew Drain to the west levee west hinge point.
Design Survey for Los Vaqueros Energy Recovery Project, Contra Costa Water District
Performed a topographic survey of the site. Additional tasks included setting control and construction
staking.
Vineyard Surface Water Treatment Plant, Sacramento County

Project Manager for surveying, responsible for recovering existing and establish new horizontal and
vertical control as needed around job site setting durable control points sufficiently to control the construction
staking process.
South Interceptor and Mather Interceptor, Sacramento County, CA

Project Manager for surveying for the design of this major sewer interceptor in south Sacramento. tasks
included control work and design surveys.
Vacaville Easterly WWTP

Project Manager for responsible for surveying tasks for the expansion of the Vacaville WWTP. The work
involved construction staking for structures and settlement ponds.
SRCSD-Upper Northwest Interceptor Sewer 1 & 2

Mr. Holmberg was a part of the ANDREGG Team providing survey services for the design surveys and right
of way engineering for this main sewer interceptor.
Page 1 of 1
John Traina Jr.
www.GroupDelta.com Manager of Quality Control Inspection and Testing
Corporate Safety Officer
Certifications SUMMARY
Quality Control Manager Army Corps/NAVFAC John has 27 years of experience in the construction,
ACI Concrete Tech Grade I
building code compliance - QA/QC industry and currently
manages as QCM, operations of Group Delta's CMT
ACI Concrete Lab Strength Tech laboratory, all field inspectors and technicians, and our
ISO 17025 Lab Program QCM safety program. As QCM his work includes direct
supervision of up to 50 construction inspectors, QA/QC for
NDT QC Manager
new construction projects, marketing and development,
Irvine Asphalt Inspector client and vendor relations, and product/service
Licensed Radiation Safety Officer representation within an engineering/scientific field. John
has completed CMT/QCM on over 300 DSA school projects,
Licensed Nuclear Gauge Operator
engineering/environmental assessments in 26 U.S. States
Licensed 40hr – HAZWOPER for a national healthcare firm and supervised steel
SCRRA Roadway Worker Training inspectors in Nippon, Japan, Mexico, Utah, Arizona and
Texas.
Licensed 24-hr Emergency Responder
Years of Experience 27
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
ARTIC – Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center 2012 to 2014
Iconic transportation terminal located across from the Honda Center. The City of Anaheim required Group
Delta to attain ISO17025 for labs quickly. John accomplished the task with our San Diego office in three
months. The project required steel shop in three states and jurisdiction with multiple agencies. I assembled
the teams, the ISO program, and determined the agency needs.
Los Angeles Unified School District and L.A. Community College District DSA Projects 2000 to 2014 John
has been a Project/Quality Control Manager for Testing and Inspection Services on DSA projects for 14 years
throughout Southern California and has performed services on over 300 DSA school projects. In all cases,
John has been the main point of contact for the inspection and materials testing contract.
Caltrans/Los Angeles Unified School District Venture, Los Angeles, CA 2006 to 2007
John created and developed an inspection and laboratory-testing plan to meet the building requirements of
DSA, Caltrans and City of Los Angeles on a multi-tiered construction project. The development satisfied all
parties on the project created a new level of services to be provided by the firm.
St John’s Hospital, Santa Monica, CA and Harlene Norris Cancer Research Center, Los Angeles, CA 2002 to
2007 Project Manager and Point of Contact for special inspections on both hospital projects. Coordinated
and provided qualified and trained inspection personnel specifically for the needs of these two projects as
required by the client, OSHPD and the City of Los Angeles. In addition to being responsible for the quality of
the inspections provided, he worked with the engineering team and reviewed the steel fabrication facilities
for compliance requirements with proprietary beam connections and Welding Procedure Specifications
(WPS).
John Traina Jr.
www.GroupDelta.com Manager of Quality Control Inspection and Testing
Corporate Safety Officer
State of California (DGS) Contracts for Inspection Services 2002 to 2007

Assigned as a project manager and inspector, John worked on the contract for all DGS projects from Santa
Barbara to San Diego. The projects included Highway Patrol Stations, State Forensic Laboratories, Road
Projects and State Museum Projects.
State of California/MWD - Tehachapi Afterbay Project 2005 to 2007
Largest water project in the world at the time, design and construction of a billion gallon reservoir. In
addition to being an inspector on this project, John worked with the onsite State DWR engineers and
inspection team, providing a team of soils and concrete inspectors, in addition to laboratory personnel for
the entire project. At the time, this was the largest water reservoir project in the United States and second
largest in the world.
Disneyland Hotel, Copper Plumbing Investigation by Ultrasonic 2008
Project Manager and assistant for an in-depth look at the thickness of the copper piping throughout the
hotels. Along with UT personnel, performed onsite inspection to assist the engineers with their re-design and
re-build drawings for the Disneyland Hotel. This project was fast-tracked to assist the Imagineering Team and
to complete the study within the time schedule needed.
City of Mission Viejo, Aegean Hills Sound-Wall, Mission Viejo, CA 2004
Project Manager all special inspections on project. Coordinated with all inspectors to perform the inspections
required by the California Building Code, Plans, Specifications and the City of Mission Viejo.
New Corona City Hall, Corona, CA, 2003 to 2005
Project Manager for all deputy and soil inspections. Duties included working with the City, Construction
Management Team (Harris & Associates) and contractors. Reviewed steel fabrication facility for compliance,
and coordinated all field/shop AWS-CWI inspectors to meet FEMA requirements.
New Mission Viejo City Hall, Mission Viejo, CA, 2000
Project Manager and Point of Contact for deputy and soil inspections. His duties included working with the
Chief Building Official, reviewing the steel fabrication facility, coordination of field/shop AWS inspectors,
compliance with FEMA requirements, and coordination with manufacturer representatives of the Keystone
Wall Block Company.
City of Hope Original Hospital Forensic Investigation for Closure, Duarte CA 1998-1999
Project Manager and field inspector for forensic sampling and testing and the eventual demolition of the
original City of Hope Hospital located in the center of the campus.
Sunrise Healthcare 1997 to 2000
John acquired and project managed Phase I, Asbestos and Engineering Assessment reviews on 90 assisted
living, in-care homes and hospice facilities across 26 U.S. for the nationwide firm. The majority of the work
was to assess the properties for purchase based on their current condition and status.
County of Orange, John Wayne Airport Expansion, Santa Ana CA, 1987 to 1991
First grading inspector assigned to the project for the Thomas Riley Terminal Expansion. Performed soils and
concrete inspection.
Company Information
Company: ZZ Technology
727 Center Lane
Santa Paula, CA 93060
Phone/Fax: 805-933-1429
E-mail: lcrossley1@roadrunner.com
Website: zztechnology.com
Established: January 1998
Owner: Larry Crossley

(Sole Proprietor)
Personal Qualifications
Engineer: Larry Crossley

Santa Paula, CA 93060
Education: Graduated in 1974 from the University of California at

Santa Barbara with B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering
Licenses: Professional Engineer in the State of California since 1978

Mechanical Engineering Certificate No. M 18600
Experience: Founder and sole proprietor of ZZ Technology since 1998, specializing in

hydraulic transient modeling, surge control equipment design, fabrication
and field testing in municipal and industrial pipeline applications. Customer
base includes such firms as Black & Veatch, Brown & Caldwell, Burns &
McDonnell, Camp Dresser & McKee, CH2M-Hill, Montgomery-Watson, Lee
& Ro Inc.
Employed by Fluid Kinetics Corporation from 1978 to 1998 as lead engineer

for surge arrestor product line. Duties included evaluation of pipeline
systems for hydraulic transients, preparation of equipment proposals for
water and wastewater projects, equipment design, startup and field-testing
to evaluate performance.
Recent Projects
Project: City of Albuquerque, NM

7W College Trunk Infrastructure
Albuquerque, NM
Customer: Bohannan-Huston, Inc.

Albuquerque, NM
Todd Burt (505) 798-7984
Duties: Hydraulic transient analysis was performed to determine surge levels in a

potable water distribution network with and without a storage reservoir
present. Surge control options for this system included an air chamber and
pipeline air/vacuum valves. Services completed June 2013
Project: Placer County Water Agency

Lincoln Meter Hydro Plant
Auburn, CA
Customer: Provost & Pritchard Consulting

Clovis, CA
Adam Claes (559) 326-1100
Duties: Hydraulic transient analysis was performed to determine surge levels during
turbine rejection during emergency conditions and normal control valve
stroking. Services completed April 2013
Project: City of Tracy

Hansen Lift Station
Tracy, CA
Customer: Lee & Ro, Inc.

Sacramento, CA
James Pollack (916) 631-0111
Duties: Hydraulic transient analysis was performed to explore surge control

requirements for current and upgraded pump station designs. Air chambers
were sized for performance under future peak flow. Services completed
January 2013
Flagler Wells TVP Connection
Flagler 2A
6 ''
&
,
CM
L
Flagler 3A
16 '' Ductile Iron Pipe

&
, 14 '' CM
L
TEMESC AL CANYON RD
6 '' PVC
L 42 '' CMLC
M
12 '' C TUSCANY ST
C ML
14 ''
CAJALCO RD
PVC
42 ''
Project location
Legend
,
& Ag Wells
Temescal Valley Pipeline
Ag Line
³
³
Document Path: G:\gis\ArcMap Projects\Engineering\Board Meeting Maps\TVp Flagler.mxd
ENGINEERING AND
Originator: Warren Huang / Larry Rein - Engineering
Subject: AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

AGREEMENT WITH KRIEGER & STEWART FOR ADDITIONAL
DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE POTTERY
STREET SEWER PROJECT AND RELOCATION OF THE
SEWER IN SAN JOAQUIN DRIVE WEST PROJECT
The existing sewers in the Pottery Street area between Main Street and Granite Street
are only 6-inches in diameter rather than the standard 8-inch diameter. The sewers
have significant structural damage, which have required frequent cleaning and flushing;
during the flushing, broken pieces of pipe have come out at the Main Street terminus.
Staff has been unable to perform CCTV inspection of the pipe due to broken pipe and
pipe offsets that block the camera. In order to avoid sewer blockages and the additional
maintenance effort, the sewers need to be replaced.
When the Canyon Lake sewer system was originally constructed, most of the lots were
unoccupied and some of the sanitary sewer lines were not routed along property lines. A
house at 22400 San Joaquin Dr. West was built over one of these lines. This line was
built out of a section of cast iron pipe in an apparent attempt to mitigate structural
damage due to the house weight. Staff has performed a CCTV inspection of this cast
iron pipe and found it to be significantly corroded and near failure; therefore, the line
needs to be relocated and rebuilt. In order to relocate the sewer, an existing storm drain
pipe will also need to be relocated.
On March 27, 2014, the Board approved a Professional Services Agreement with Krieger
& Stewart (K&S) for design of the Pottery Street Sewer Project for $108,770 and San
Joaquin Drive West Project for $19,195. Based on the preliminary design effort for the
San Joaquin Drive sewer relocation, it was determined that in order to avoid the existing
storm drain, the start of the sewer realignment had to begin at a location further
upstream. This new location would require an additional easement, which is not within
the original design scope.
The additional scope of services is strictly for San Joaquin Drive sewer relocation
including additional topographic mapping, legal description and plats preparation, and
contract documents separation into two bid packages. As the effort to secure an
easement will require additional time, the decision was to have the project broken into
two bid packages so that the Pottery Street project can be bid ahead of this project.
Staff solicited and received the attached proposal from K&S in the amount of $5,600 for
the additional design services.
review, Staff recommends approval of Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services
Agreement with Krieger and Stewart in the amount of $5,600 for the Pottery Street
Sewer Project and the San Joaquin Drive West Project. This item, including overhead of
$280, as well as staff time and fringe benefits of $33,345.90 totals $39,225.90. The
additional staff time is related to the effort expended in soliciting, coordinating, and
negotiating the additional easement.
This project qualifies for a CEQA Class 2 exemption as replacement of existing facilities.
Staff will review the appropriate guidelines and prepare a Notice of Exemption for filing.
FISCAL IMPACT
Attachments:
Fiscal Impact
Krieger & Stewart Proposal
Location Map
FISCAL IMPACT
• Funding Source:
o Fund 333 – Regional Sewer Replacement Fund
75867 75875
Pottery Flint San Joaquin
Amount Amount
Funding Budgeted FY13-14 $ 802,597 $ 79,695
Expended / Committed to Date (174,481) (37,132)
Balance Available $ 628,116 $ 42,563
Requested Amount - (39,226)
Remaining Balance $ 628,116 $ 3,338
Engineering Staff Time/Fringe Benefits 18,280 11,111
Design 153,274 19,195
Overhead 2,868 825
Others 59 6,000
Total $ 174,481 $ 37,132
Activity No. 7587501DE01

December 5, 2014 754-13.1A
Larry Rein, P.E., Capital Projects Manager

Post Office Box 3000
Lake Elsinore, CA 92531-3000
Subject: Pottery Street Sewer and Relocation of the Sewer in

San Joaquin Drive West (Project Nos. 75867 and 75875)
Additional Engineering Services
Dear Mr. Rein:
Per your request, we hereby submit our proposal to provide additional design engineering services for subject
project. These additional services are related to the additional topographic mapping and preparation of legal
descriptions and plats for the San Joaquin Drive West portion of the project resulting from the discovered
utility conflicts. In addition, we would appreciate District's consideration of Krieger & Stewart's expenses
incurred as a result of separating common set of contract documents into two separate sets of contract
documents.
We have prepared the following Scope of Services and Fee Estimate:
A. SCOPE OF SERVICES
1. Additional Topographic Mapping
Based on our discussion, limits of replacement of the existing sewer will be expanded to the
upstream sewer manhole (easterly of San Joaquin Drive), which is outside the original
topographic mapping strip. Therefore, additional 200' long mapping strip is required.
2. Additional Legal Descriptions and Plats
Our proposal included preparation of one legal description and plat (for APN 353-111-010).
Since District's existing sewer easement width along additional sewer segment is insufficient
for construction of the new sewer, two additional legal descriptions and plats are required
(one for APN 353-112-036 and one for APN 353-112-028).
3. Contract Documents Separation
Our proposal was based on preparation of one set of contract documents (plans and
specifications) for Pottery Street Sewer and Relocation of the Sewer in San Joaquin Drive
West. Following our 90% submittal, and due to lengthy easement acquisition process, the
District has instructed Krieger & Stewart to separate the contract documents to avoid
potential construction delays of Pottery Street Sewer Project.
3602 University Avenue, Riverside, California 92501-3331

Tel: (951) 684-6900  Fax: (951) 684-6986  www.kriegerandstewart.com
Larry Rein, P.E., Capital Projects Manager
December 5, 2014
Page 2
B. FEE ESTIMATE
Our fee for providing additional engineering services described above is estimated not to exceed
$5,600, summarized as follows:
> Additional topographic mapping $500.00

> Two additional legal descriptions and plats $4,000.00
> Separation of Contract Documents (plans and specifications) $1,100.00
Based on the above, we respectfully request that the $5,600 of additional services be authorized. If you have
any questions or need additional information, please call.
Sincerely,
KRIEGER & STEWART
SS/nr
754-13PI-AddISvcs-l
!
( !
( !
( !
( !
(
Sewer Pipe Improvements

In Pottery Street & San Joaquin Dr West !
(
!
(
ELLIS ST
!
(
GRANITE ST
!
(
!
(
495 LF
MAIN ST
390 LF
375 LF
280 LF
!
( !
(
250 LF
!
( !
( !
( !
( !
( (!
! ( !
( !
(
1,080 LF
200 LF
250 LF
300 LF
340 LF
!
(
SA
N
JO
A
!
(
28
0
LF
µ
QU
!
( IN
DR
W
!
( !
( !
(
LF
0
28
!
(
!
(
6'
'V
8'
itri
'P
f
oly
i ed
vin
yl
Cl
Ch
µ
ay
lo rid
Pi p
e
e
!
(
Legend
- Sewer to be replaced
- Manhole to added/replaced
Path: G:\gis\ArcMap Projects\Engineering\CIP exhibits\75867\Meeting Map.mxd

ENGINEERING AND
Originator: Warren Huang / Larry Rein - Engineering
Subject: AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO DOWNING

CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR THE TUSCANY TRUNK SEWER
AND FLOW CONTROL STRUCTURE PROJECT
The Railroad Canyon Water Reclamation Facility (RCWRF) treats wastewater from the
Canyon Lake area and produces recycled water. During the last two years, the amount
of recycled water produced by RCWRF is less than the demand for recycled water for
irrigation in the Cottonwood Hills Development Area. The RCWRF has capacity to treat
and supply more recycled water. This project for a Trunk Sewer Junction and Flow
Control Structure will provide additional flow to the treatment plant.
Two parallel and adjacent trunk sewers from Canyon Lake and Tuscany Hills flow toward
the San Jacinto River and then follow a path parallel to the river. The Canyon Lake trunk
sewer flows to the RCWRF for treatment; the Tuscany Hills trunk sewer bypasses the
RCWRF and continues to the Regional Wastewater Reclamation Facility for treatment.
Because RCWRF has the capacity to treat additional flows from Tuscany Hills, this
project will intercept the Tuscany Hills trunk sewer at a location closest to the Canyon
Lake trunk sewer just south of Via de la Valle. Wastewater flows can then be diverted
from the Tuscany Hills trunk sewer to the Canyon Lake trunk sewer through a sewer
junction structure. In addition, only flows from the Tuscany Hills trunk sewer can be
directed to either facility for treatment through a combination of open or closed gates.
On October 24, 2013, the Board approved a Professional Services Agreement (PSA)
with Krieger & Stewart Engineering Consultants for design of the Trunk Sewer Junction
and Flow Control Structure, which included preparation of plans and specifications. On
June 26, 2014, the Board approved Amendment No. 1 to the PSA with Krieger & Stewart
for additional services that included preparation and review of the preliminary title report,
additional site visits by the survey crew, changes to the Junction and Flow Control
Structure concept and location, and investigation of flow isolation gate configurations and
materials.
The construction work was advertised for bid on August 29 and September 5, 2014.
Bids opened on September 23, 2014. The apparent low bidder, Pro-Craft Construction,
withdrew from the District's list of pre-qualified contractors and therefore is not eligible for
Contract award. The second low bidder, Downing Construction, Inc., was contacted and
had agreed to honor their bid amount to the end of January 2015.
review, Staff requests that the next lowest bidder, Downing Construction, Inc. be
considered for approval of a construction contract for the Tuscany Trunk Sewer and Flow
Control Structure Project in the amount of $286,763. This item, including overhead of
$14,338, as well as staff time and fringe benefits of $33,345, totals $334,446.90.
A Notice of Exemption was filed with the Riverside County Clerk's office on July 1, 2014.
FISCAL IMPACT
Attachments:
Fiscal Impact
Downing Construction Bid
Bid Analysis
Signed Contract
Procurement Summary
Location Map
FISCAL IMPACT
• Funding Source:
o Fund 333 – Regional Sewer Replacement Fund
Amount
Funding Budgeted FY13-14 $ 161,000
Funding Budgeted FY14-15 493,500
Expended / Committed to Date (207,365)
Balance Available $ 447,135
Requested Amount (334,447) *
Remaining Balance $ 112,688
Construction Management 88,000
Design 81,453
Engineering Staff Time/Fringe Benefits 31,636
Overhead 4,178
Others 2,099
Total $ 207,365
Activity No. 7587101CO01

Procurement Summary
WO 75871 - TRUNK SEWER JUNCTION & FLOW CONTROL STRUCTURE
The Trunk Sewer Junction & Flow Control Structure will provide additional flow of recycled water to the Railroad Canyon Water Reclamation
Facility.
% of Total
PO Item Supplier Amount Description
Project Cost
DESIGN
PSA
Krieger & Stewart $ 65,953.00 14.45% Project design
Oct. 24, 2013
Proposed
Amend. 1 Krieger & Stewart $ 15,500.00 3.40% Additional field survey work required.
June 26, 2014
Design Total $ 81,453.00 17.85%
CONSTRUCTION
Jan. 22, 2105 Downing Construction $ 286,763.00 62.85% Construction contract
Construction
$ 286,763.00 62.85%
Total
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT &
INSPECTION SERVICES
PSA
Krieger & Stewart $ 88,000.00 19.29% CM & Inspection services
Oct. 23, 2014
CM & Inspection Total $ 88,000.00 19.29%
COMMUNITY RELATIONS
PSA Community liaison, construction information
Vendor Name 0.00%
Date services, preparation of newsletters
Community Relations Total $ - 0.00%
CEQA
Notice of
Riverside County Clerk $ 50.00 0.01% Notice of Exemption filing fee
Exemption
CEQA Total $ 50.00 0.01%
Total Project Cost: $456,266.00 100.00%
Original Budget $161,000.00 Budget Information Provided by Finance

Supplemental Budget
Final Project Budget Total $ 161,000.00
ENGINEERING AND
Originator: Warren Huang - Engineering
Subject: ENCINA DRIVE ABANDONED BOOSTER PUMP STATION

PROPERTY SALE
Mr. Jun Hwan Kim, owner of the adjacent parcel to the abandoned Encina Booster Pump
Station facility, contacted the District on April 19, 2013 requesting to purchase the parcel
from the District. See Exhibit A, Mr. Kim's letter requesting to purchase parcel.
Mr. Kim was informed he must acquire an appraisal of the property in order to make an
offer to the District based on the appraised value and was subsequently directed to the
District's real estate consultant, Marsha Swanson. See Exhibit B, the Appraisal Report,
valuing the parcel at $8,400.
Staff discussed this item at the September 4, 2014 Engineering and Operations
Committee meeting. It was determined that the District was required to notice various
public agencies of our intention to dispose of this parcel at Fair Market Value before the
property could be sold. Letters were subsequently mailed on October 27, 2014, and the
public agencies were given 60 days to respond in writing if they had an interest in the
property. See Exhibit C, List of Agencies.
Written notice has not been received from any of the public agencies; therefore, staff
recommends that the Board approve the property sale to Mr. Jun Hwan Kim.
Staff plans to present this item for approval at the January 22, 2015 Board meeting.
This item does not constitue a project under CEQA
.
FISCAL IMPACT
• Within Budget – N/A
Attachments:
Exhibit A - Mr. Kim's Letter

Exhibit B - Appraisal Report
Exhibit C - List of Agencies

01-06-15 Packet For Adjourned Regular Engineering and Operations Committee Meeting

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

01-06-15 Packet For Adjourned Regular Engineering and Operations Committee Meeting

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

AGENDA

ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE

1. Professional Services Agreement with Water Works Engineers, LLC for

2. Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Krieger &

3. Award of Construction Contract to Downing Construction, Inc. for the

4. Encina Drive Abandoned Booster Pump Station Property Sale

6. Consider Items for Board Review

Date: January 6, 2015

Originator: Warren Huang - Engineering

Subject: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WATER

BACKGROUND AND RECOMMENDATION

ENVIRONMENTAL WORK STATUS

• Within Budget – Yes. See attached page.

Funding Budgeted FY14-15 $ 1,100,000

Expended / Committed to Date (9,149)

Balance Available $ 1,090,851

Requested Amount (427,559) *

Remaining Balance $ 663,292

Breakdown of Expended/Committed to Date

Staff Time/Fringe Benefits 8,541

Lab Testing 500

* The requested amount includes 310 hours of staff time

Requisition No. 24946

Activity No. 7587701DE01

ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT

OCTOBER 23, 2014

RE: Proposal to Provide Engineering Services

Dear Mr. Heidt:

Very Truly Yours

Sami Kader, P.E., Principal Andrew Borgic, P.E., Project Manager

Water Works Engineers, LLC

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING ....................................................................... 9

SCOPE OF WORK ..................................................................................... 17

PROJECT MANAGEMENT ......................................................................... 51

RELATED EXPERIENCE .............................................................................. 54

REQUIRED DOCUMENTS .......................................................................... 60

WATER AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Water Works Engineers selects and designs treatment processes that

COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM PLANNING AND DESIGN

Our planning and design efforts often

 Department of Public Health permitting assistance

MECHANICAL SYSTEM DESIGN

PREPARARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

3-DIMENSIONAL CADD MODELING

FACILITY START UP AND OPERATIONAL SUPPORT

COLLECTION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE ASSISTANCE

 Sewer System Management Plans (SSMP)  Predictive Asset Failure Modeling

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AUDITS

PIPE REHABILITATION/REPLACEMENT AND TRENCHLESS CONSTRUCTION

ALTERNATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY

Water Works Engineers partners with contractors throughout

BIOSOLIDS AND POWER GENERATION

 Biosolids thickening facilities planning, selection, and detailed design.

 Successfully evaluate alternative alignments to mitigate utility conflict, environmental, permitting

 Maintain project budget control, both in design and construction costs

We have the experience, expertise and dedication to accomplish these goals.

ISSUE #1 – PIPELINE ALIGNMENT CONSTRAINTS, SELECTION AND DESIGN

Environmental Constraints and Approach

Pipeline Design Constraints

Public Agency Coordination

Private Easement Procurement

ISSUE #3 – CHEMICAL FEED FACILITY DESIGN AND SITING

1. Injection of Chemicals Into a High Pressure Water Main