2017-2018 International Security 260318 PDF

BSc 2 Pol
International Security 260318 (6442IIS14Y2018)

No. of responses = 111
Survey Results
Legend Relative Frequencies of answers Std. Dev. Mean
25% 0% 50% 0% 25%

Question text Left pole Right pole n=No. of responses
av.=Mean
dev.=Std. Dev.
ab.=Abstention
1 2 3 4 5
Scale Histogram
Opleidingsvariant / Track
n=86
Politicologie Algemeen 0%
Politicologie IBO 100%
Political Science IRO 0%
Minor / Keuzevak 0%
Study Abroad Program / Exchange 0%
Algemeen / General
0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 2% 18,2% 50,5% 22,2% 6,1%

Wat is uw totaaloordeel (rapportcijfer) over deze cursus? 1 10 n=99
av.=8,1
/ How would you rate the overall quality of this course on dev.=0,9
a scale from 1 - 10? (1=very poor, 10=excellent)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0% 3% 70,3% 22,8% 4%
Vergeleken met het aantal studiepunten (1EC=28 uur) much too light much too heavy n=101
av.=3,3
dat ervoor staat, is de feitelijke studielast van deze dev.=0,6
cursus / In light of the number of ECs awarded for this
course (1 EC= 28hrs), the actual study load of this
1 2 3 4 5
course is (1= much too light, 2=relatively light, 3= in
proportion, 4= relatively heavy, 5= much too heavy)
0% 1% 10,3% 54,6% 34%
De studiestof sluit aan bij de leerdoelen van deze cursus disagree agree n=97
av.=4,2
(leerdoelen: zie ommezijde) / The course material fits in dev.=0,7
well with the course objectives (course objectives:
please turn over)
1 2 3 4 5
1,1% 1,1% 9,5% 50,5% 37,9%

De wijze waarop studieprestaties in deze cursus disagree agree n=95
av.=4,2
worden beoordeeld sluit aan bij de leerdoelen/ The way dev.=0,8
in which students' performances are graded in this
course fits in well with the course objectives
1 2 3 4 5
Leerzaamheid / Instructiveness
1% 0% 7,3% 33,3% 58,3%

Hoe leerzaam waren de hoorcolleges? (niet invullen very little very much n=96
av.=4,5
indien geen hoorcolleges gevolgd) / How much did you dev.=0,7
learn from the plenary lectures (if no plenary lectures
attended, do not answer)
1 2 3 4 5
16,7% 0% 50% 33,3% 0%

Hoe leerzaam waren de werkgroepen? (niet invullen very little very much n=6
av.=3
indien geen werkgroepen gevolgd) / How much did you dev.=1,1
learn from the work groups (if no work groups attended,
do not answer)
1 2 3 4 5
26.03.2018 EvaSys evaluation Page 1

Organisatie / Organisation
0% 0% 8,1% 52,5% 39,4%

De organisatie van deze cursus is goed / The course is disagree agree n=99
av.=4,3
well organised dev.=0,6
1 2 3 4 5
1% 0% 4,1% 51,5% 43,3%

De informatievoorziening (bijv. e-studiegids, disagree agree n=97
av.=4,4
Blackboard) over deze cursus is goed / The provision of dev.=0,7
course information (e.g. e-study guide, Blackboard) is
good
1 2 3 4 5
Wat is het nummer van je werkgroep of practicum? (niet The evaluation will not be displayed due to low response rate.
invullen indien niet van toepassing) / What is the number
of your workgroup or practical (if no workgroups, do not
mark)
Leerdoelen / Course objectives
0% 2% 2% 58,2% 37,8%
Enable students to think critically beyond state-centered disagree agree n=98
av.=4,3
conceptions of security. dev.=0,6
1 2 3 4 5
0% 2,1% 9,4% 53,1% 35,4%

Locate the study of international security within a disagree agree n=96
av.=4,2
broader sociological context. dev.=0,7
1 2 3 4 5
9,4% 4,2% 10,4% 37,5% 38,5%

Hoeveel hoorcolleges/bijeenkomsten heeft u 1 5 n=96
av.=3,9
bijgewoond? / How many of the plenary lectures did you dev.=1,2
attend?
(1= less than 25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 51-75%, 4= more
1 2 3 4 5
than 75%, 5= all)
0% 0% 33,3% 33,3% 33,3%

De opdrachten in deze cursus waren leerzaam / The disagree agree n=3
av.=4
assignments in this course were instructive dev.=1
ab.=79
1 2 3 4 5
0% 50% 0% 50% 0%
De feedback op mijn opdrachten was leerzaam / The disagree agree n=2
av.=3
feedback on my assignments was instructive dev.=1,4
ab.=81
1 2 3 4 5
1,1% 2,2% 7,5% 44,1% 45,2%

De tentamenvragen vormen een goede afspiegeling van disagree agree n=93
av.=4,3
de tentamenstof / The items of the exam cover the dev.=0,8
required reading for the exam
1 2 3 4 5
0% 5,3% 16% 34% 44,7%

De formulering van de tentamenvragen is helder / The disagree agree n=94
av.=4,2
items of the exam are well phrased dev.=0,9
1 2 3 4 5
Cursusmateriaal / Course material
0% 11,2% 32,7% 45,9% 10,2%

The course will be based on a textbook: Peoples C and very poor very good n=98
av.=3,6
Vaughan-Williams N (2014) Critical security studies : an dev.=0,8
introduction (2nd edition). London ; New York:
Routledge.
1 2 3 4 5

Docenten / Lecturers
0% 1% 3% 24% 72%
Francesco Ragazzi very poor very good n=100
av.=4,7
dev.=0,6
1 2 3 4 5
0% 0% 66,7% 33,3% 0%
Wat is uw oordeel over uw de werkgroepdocent? / What very poor very good n=3
av.=3,3
is your opinion on your workgroup tutor? dev.=0,6
1 2 3 4 5

Profile
Subunit: FSW Politicologie
Name of the instructor: BSc 2 Pol
Name of the course: International Security 260318
(Name of the survey)
Values used in the profile line: Mean
Algemeen / General
Wat is uw totaaloordeel (rapportcijfer) over deze 1 10

cursus? / How would you rate the overall quality of n=99 av.=8,1 md=8,0 dev.=0,9
this course on a scale from 1 - 10? (1=very poor,
Vergeleken met het aantal studiepunten (1EC=28 much too light much too heavy
uur) dat ervoor staat, is de feitelijke studielast van n=101 av.=3,3 md=3,0 dev.=0,6
deze cursus / In light of the number of ECs awarded
De studiestof sluit aan bij de leerdoelen van deze disagree agree
cursus (leerdoelen: zie ommezijde) / The course n=97 av.=4,2 md=4,0 dev.=0,7
material fits in well with the course objectives
De wijze waarop studieprestaties in deze cursus disagree agree
worden beoordeeld sluit aan bij de leerdoelen/ The n=95 av.=4,2 md=4,0 dev.=0,8
way in which students' performances are graded in
Leerzaamheid / Instructiveness
Hoe leerzaam waren de hoorcolleges? (niet invullen very little very much
indien geen hoorcolleges gevolgd) / How much did n=96 av.=4,5 md=5,0 dev.=0,7
you learn from the plenary lectures (if no plenary
Hoe leerzaam waren de werkgroepen? (niet invullen very little very much
indien geen werkgroepen gevolgd) / How much did n=6 av.=3,0 md=3,0 dev.=1,1
you learn from the work groups (if no work groups
Organisatie / Organisation
De organisatie van deze cursus is goed / The disagree agree

course is well organised n=99 av.=4,3 md=4,0 dev.=0,6
De informatievoorziening (bijv. e-studiegids, disagree agree

Blackboard) over deze cursus is goed / The n=97 av.=4,4 md=4,0 dev.=0,7
provision of course information (e.g. e-study guide,
Leerdoelen / Course objectives
Enable students to think critically beyond state- disagree agree

centered conceptions of security. n=98 av.=4,3 md=4,0 dev.=0,6
Locate the study of international security within a disagree agree

broader sociological context. n=96 av.=4,2 md=4,0 dev.=0,7
Hoeveel hoorcolleges/bijeenkomsten heeft u 1 5

bijgewoond? / How many of the plenary lectures did n=96 av.=3,9 md=4,0 dev.=1,2
you attend?
De opdrachten in deze cursus waren leerzaam / disagree agree
The assignments in this course were instructive n=3 av.=4,0 md=4,0 dev.=1,0
De feedback op mijn opdrachten was leerzaam / disagree agree

The feedback on my assignments was instructive n=2 av.=3,0 md=3,0 dev.=1,4
De tentamenvragen vormen een goede afspiegeling disagree agree

van de tentamenstof / The items of the exam cover n=93 av.=4,3 md=4,0 dev.=0,8
the required reading for the exam
De formulering van de tentamenvragen is helder / disagree agree
The items of the exam are well phrased n=94 av.=4,2 md=4,0 dev.=0,9

Cursusmateriaal / Course material
The course will be based on a textbook: Peoples C very poor very good
and Vaughan-Williams N (2014) Critical security n=98 av.=3,6 md=4,0 dev.=0,8
studies : an introduction (2nd edition). London ; New
Docenten / Lecturers
Francesco Ragazzi very poor very good

n=100 av.=4,7 md=5,0 dev.=0,6
Wat is uw oordeel over uw de werkgroepdocent? / very poor very good

What is your opinion on your workgroup tutor? n=3 av.=3,3 md=3,0 dev.=0,6

Comments Report
Aanvullend / Additional
Opmerkingen / Open Comments:


2017-2018 International Security 260318 PDF

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

2017-2018 International Security 260318 PDF

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

BSc 2 Pol

International Security 260318 (6442IIS14Y2018)

Legend Relative Frequencies of answers Std. Dev. Mean

25% 0% 50% 0% 25%

Politicologie IBO 100%

Political Science IRO 0%

Study Abroad Program / Exchange 0%

0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 2% 18,2% 50,5% 22,2% 6,1%

1,1% 1,1% 9,5% 50,5% 37,9%

1% 0% 7,3% 33,3% 58,3%

16,7% 0% 50% 33,3% 0%

26.03.2018 EvaSys evaluation Page 1

0% 0% 8,1% 52,5% 39,4%

1% 0% 4,1% 51,5% 43,3%

Leerdoelen / Course objectives

0% 2,1% 9,4% 53,1% 35,4%

9,4% 4,2% 10,4% 37,5% 38,5%

0% 0% 33,3% 33,3% 33,3%

1,1% 2,2% 7,5% 44,1% 45,2%

0% 5,3% 16% 34% 44,7%

Cursusmateriaal / Course material

0% 11,2% 32,7% 45,9% 10,2%

26.03.2018 EvaSys evaluation Page 2

26.03.2018 EvaSys evaluation Page 3

Values used in the profile line: Mean

Wat is uw totaaloordeel (rapportcijfer) over deze 1 10

De organisatie van deze cursus is goed / The disagree agree

De informatievoorziening (bijv. e-studiegids, disagree agree

Leerdoelen / Course objectives

Enable students to think critically beyond state- disagree agree

Locate the study of international security within a disagree agree

Hoeveel hoorcolleges/bijeenkomsten heeft u 1 5

De feedback op mijn opdrachten was leerzaam / disagree agree

De tentamenvragen vormen een goede afspiegeling disagree agree

26.03.2018 EvaSys evaluation Page 4

Francesco Ragazzi very poor very good

Wat is uw oordeel over uw de werkgroepdocent? / very poor very good

26.03.2018 EvaSys evaluation Page 5

Opmerkingen / Open Comments:

26.03.2018 EvaSys evaluation Page 6

Potrebbero piacerti anche