Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Annual Meeting
14th Annual Society for Airway
Management Scientific Meeting
OBJETIVE
* 12 * 6
* 6
CEDIVA DENIA | FORMACIÓN CONTINUADA EN VÍA AÉREA
* 12
Vertical movement of the
tip of the fiberscope
following the numerical
sequence (fig 3)
Repeat this sequence four
times.
* 12 * 12 * 12 * 12 *
* 6
* 12 DENIA
CEDIVA * | FORMACIÓN
6 * CONTINUADA
12 * EN VÍA6AÉREA*
Horizontal motion of the
tip of the fiberscope
following the numerical
sequence (Fig. 4)
Repeat this sequence
four times.
* 9
* 3
* 9 *
CEDIVA DENIA | FORMACIÓN CONTINUADA EN VÍA AÉREA 3 * 9 * 3 *
Rotational movement
* 12 9 6 9 12 *
of the tip of the
fiberscope in the
sequence number
(fig 5) Repeat the
sequence four times.
* 12 3 6 3 12 *
* A B C D C B A *
* B A D C D A B *
Figure 6
CLOCK PRACTICE
Methods Abstract
•Protocol combines timing of extubation with
availability of necessary devices Title: Extubating the difficult airway: A protocol for timing and not burning bridges
Francisca Llobell, M.D., Patricia Marzal, M.D., Luis Gonzalez, M.D., Lauren K Hoke, B.S. and Yvon F Bryan, M.D..
Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital G.U. Marina Alta, Denia, Alicante, Spain.
Introduction
Different airway devices may be used to facilitate extubating patients with difficult airways (1, 2). The timing and
devices needed to bridge the extubation, however, depend on the patients condition and risk. The possibility of
aspiration, experiencing potential difficulty with oxygenation and ventilation and the need for re-intubation are
problems frequently encountered. A protocol for extubation must take into account these problems and combine
them with the timing of extubation and the availability of the necessary airway devices needed to bridge. We
present our experience using a protocol for extubating patients with difficult airways.
Methods
The protocol for extubating patients with difficult airways combined the timing (immediate versus delayed) of
extubation with the availability of the necessary airway devices required for bridging (see Figure 1). A table of
airway devices set up according to their function was used for the patients (3).
Results
No com plications occurred in any patients in which the protocol was used (see Table 1).
Discussion
The extubation protocol provided a strategy for timing the extubation with the necessary airway devices needed
to bridge the extubation. The protocol was designed to take into account the risks associated with the patients
underlying condition and/or surgical intervention with the airway device best suited for the patient. By allowing
for versatility, the protocol facilitated reassessing the patients need to remain intubated, to bridge or to delay the
extubation. Further studies are needed in the management of patients with difficult airways during extubation.
References
1) Anesth Analg 2007; 105:1357-1362.
2) Anesth. Analg. 2007; 105: 11821185.
3) Llobell F, et al. Euroanaesthesia 2008 Annual Meeting.
Abstract
Methods Results Title: Managing the difficult airway at extubation: Vices or devices
Francisca Llobell, M.D., Patricia Marzal, M.D., Maria Serna, M.D., Lauren K Hoke, B.S. and Yvon F
Bryan, M.D.. Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital G.U. Marina Alta, Denia, Alicante, Spain.
management of DA during extubation Problems encountered during extubation of patients with difficult airways are prevalent though formal guidelines
seem to be lacking (1). This dichotomy of problems occurring at extubation and a lack of specific strategies may
be due to anesthesiologist experience and/or training with specialized airway devices required during the
management of the difficult airway (2). Certain airway devices may be best suited for rescue (oxygenation and
•Surveyed 38 anesthesiology departments in the ventilation) while others are better used to bridge (reintubation) and to delay the extubation. We surveyed
Spanish anesthesiologists about their clinical practice management for the extubation of patients with difficult
Discussion
Our survey found a very high incidence of problems occurring at extubation in patients with difficult airways. A
lack of established extubation protocols and training with specialized airway devices may be the reason for the
problems. The devices used to rescue and bridge the extubation by the majority of respondents were
supralaryngeal in nature. This may have reflected the individuals training with these devices, the unavailability of
certain devices or not being familiar with other types of devices (ie, airway exchange catheters). Further research
is required in the management of the difficult airway to discern which devices are best suited for rescuing and/or
bridging during extubation.
References
1) Anesthesiology 2005:103(1);33-9.
2) Anesthesiology 2007:100;A934
ASA 2008
CEDIVA DENIA | FORMACIÓN CONTINUADA EN VÍA AÉREA
IARS - International
Anesthesia Research Society
IARS Annual Meeting
USA
Abstract
C. D.
Title: The new VAMA® intubating airway: a unique design for fiberoptic intubation
Authors: Marzal Patricia, Llobell Francisca, Cardona Juan, Madrid Andres, Madrid Valentin, Bryan
Methods Results
Yvon
Introduction
Several available intubating airways facilitate performing fiberoptic intubation and placing an
endotracheal tube (1,2). The new VAMA intubating airway incorporates design features which address
common problems encountered during fiberoptic intubation. A line with an arrow (lasermark)
embedded on the distal part of the ventral surface of the posterior portion of the airway facilitates
•19 patients underwent FFB using VAMA •Age (mean and range) = 57.5 years (31-86) orientation (see Figure 1). A detachable piece on the proximal portion of the airway facilitates removing
the VAMA airway while the endotracheal tube (ETT) remains connected to the circuit; thus avoiding
interruption in ventilation and inadvertent extubation. We describe our experience with the VAMA®
•Awake/sedation with topical anesthesia or general •Time to intubation (mean,range) = 42 seconds intubating airway for fiberoptic intubation.
= 6/19 (32%) patients of the VAMA® airway was removed without disconnecting the ETT from circuit.
•Removal of VAMA does not interrupt ventilation or •Intubations on first attempt (one patient required Results
risk inadvertent extubation 3 attempts) = 18/19 (95%) patients The mean and range of age and time to intubation were 57.5 years (31-86) and 42 seconds (25-70). In
13 patients, the glottic opening was visualized on first pass of the FFB placed in the VAMA® airway. In
6 patients, a chin lift exposed the glottic opening. All intubations occurred on first attempt, except one
•5 patients with known difficult airways which required three attempts. Five patients had known difficult airways (DA), 7 intubations were
awake and in 7 patients, paralytic agents were used. Discussion
•7 intubations performed awake/sedation, 7 The lasermark of the VAMA® airway helps identify the anatomical landmarks necessary for fiberoptic
intubation. Disconnecting the removable piece facilitates complete removal of the VAMA® airway.
intubations using paralytics Further research is required comparing to other intubating airways in patients with known DA’s who are
both awake and anesthetized.
References
1) J Clin Anesth 2004 16:66-73.
2) Anaesth 2004 59: 173–176.
3) VAMA Canula Package Insert www.ajlsa.com
El manejo de la vía aérea difícil conocida exige elaborar un plan para minimizar el riesgo
de hipoxia aguda ante una demora en la intubación siguiendo la estrategia establecida
según los algoritmos de referencia (Anesthesiology 2003).
CASO CLÍNICO
• Mujer, 43 años.
• Obesidad, DMNID. Varios episodios de crisis tónico-clónicas por Encefalitis de
Hashimoto.
• Nuevo episodio refractario a tratamiento médico (Fenitoína y Diazepam i.v.).
MANEJO
SEDOANALGESIA CONTROL DE LA VÍA AÉREA
INTUBACIÓN ENDOTRAQUEAL
* La ASA recomienda valorar:
• VENTILACIÓN DIFÍCIL - IMC 34,6 kg/m2
• INTUBACIÓN DIFÍCIL – Historia de VAD anticipada, cuello corto y grueso, retracción
mandibular, macroglosia
• COOPERACIÓN - NO, dada la situación clínica
• TRAQUEOSTOMÍA DIFÍCIL - SI
5. Llobell F, Madrid V, Marzal P, Hoke Lauren K, Bryan Y. Airway Management Strategies of Difficult
Airways at Extubation: Despite Risk Much Left to Chance. En: ASA Annual Meeting 2007; A934.
6. F.Llobell, P.Marzal; M.Echeverri, L.Hoke, Y.Bryan . Strategy for extubation of the difficult airway: A
protocol and table of airway devices. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008; 25 (Suppl 44): 19AP6-8.
7. F.Llobell, P. Marzal, M. Serna, L. Hoke, Y Bryan. Managing the Difficult Airway at Extubation: Vices or
Devices. A1725 ASA 2008.
8. F.Llobell, P. Marzal, L.Gonzalez, L. Hoke, Y Bryan. Extubating the Difficult Airway: A protocol for Timing
and not Burning Bridges. A1729 ASA 2008.