Page 1 of 8

..

SOME CONUNDRUMS FOR

ENGINEER ‘’ALI: MIRZA: OF
JHELUM
QUESTIONS THAT REVEAL THAT ENGINEER ‘’ALI:
MIRZA IS ON THE M-NHAJ OF RAVA:FID: IN
PARTICULAR AND ON THE M-NH-J OF HERESY IN
GENERAL
HUSAM

[Year]

Page 1 of 8
 Page 2 of 8

SOME CONUNDRUMS FOR ENGINEER ‘’ALI: MIRZA: 04-11-2018 CE.

Page 2 of 8
 Page 3 of 8

Engineer ‘’Ali: Mirza: of City Of Jhelum (Panjab) is one of the greatest heretic of the 21st
Century CE. He does not believe in the basic INDEPENDANT AXIOMS / PRINCIPLES OF
‘AHLUSSUNNAH. Yet he claims to be on the M-nh-j of ‘Ahlussunnah. Actually he is on
the M-nh-j of Ravafid: if not a Ra:fid:i: .

He is often found to propagate Rafid:ism .

It is strange that some of his followers are still believing that this Heretic is Preaching true ‘Isla:m.

Actually he is not. We have produced a number of proofs and evidences that Engineer “’Ali: Mirza is
preaching Heresy and Apostasy.

He also produces wrong materials and invalid arguments for his heretic believes.

In this ARTICLE THERE IS A LIST OF conundrums which do shew that he is a heretic.

CONUNDRUM :1

Is Twelvers a sub-sect of Rava:fid: or it is not?

CONUNDRUM:2

Are the Authors of ‘Us:u:l ‘Al ‘Arba’’ah Rava:fid: or not?

Is the author of Nahj ‘Al Bala:gh:ah [Shari:f Rad:i:] a Rafid:i: ?

Conundrum :3

Are Saiiduna: ‘’Ali: , Saiyiduna: H:asan, Saiyiduna: H:usain and Saiyidatuna: Fat:imah [RD: FOR EACH ONE
OF THE MENTIONED ABOVE Persons] Infallible [Ma’’s:u:m] or some of them are Infallible or None of
them is Infallible?

CONUNDRUM:4

DiD Saiyiduna: ‘’Umar commit a Sin or a Transgression of Divine Law [Shar-’’] in the Event of Q-RT:A:S?

[Na’’u:dh:ubillah].

CONUNDRUM:5

If there is no proof of any sin and of any transgression of Divine Law from any Tradition of First Category
[S:ah:i:h:] ,for a particular S:ah:a:bi: /S:ah:a:biah [Who so ever he/she may be] then does this be a
Proof of Infallibility of the S:ah:a:bi: /S:ah:a:biah ?

CONUNDRUM:6

Page 3 of 8
 Page 4 of 8

If S:ah:a:bah are not infallible then does their Fallibility [‘’Adam ‘Al Ma’’S:u:miah] impliy that each one
of them had committed at least one Sin or One Transgression Of Divine Law?

Is there a S:h:a:bi /S:ah:a:biah who had never committed a single Sin and a Single Transgression Of
Divine Law even if he/she is not an Infallible Person?

CONUNDRUM:7

Does Engineer ‘’Ali: Mirza: of Jhelum Includes Saiyiduna: “’Ali: RD: , Saiyiduna: H:asan RD:, Saiyiduna:
H:USAIN RD:, Saiyidatuna: Fa:t:imah RD: in S:AH:A:BAH OR HE EXCLUDES THEM FROM
S:AH:A:BAH?

[Na’’u:dh:ubillah].

CONUNDRUM:8

A]Does Engineer ‘’Ali: Mirza: of Jhelum believe that there is a Single S:ah:a:bi: who did not commit a
single Sin and did not commit a single Transgression of Law , inspite of the fact that he is not a Ma’’s:u:m
[i.e not Infallible] ?

B] Is there is a human Being other than Prophets who is neither Ma’’s:u:m /Infallible nor committed a
sin nor a transgression in his /her entire span of life? If there is such a person [whether male or female]

Then is he /she a S:ah:a:bi /S:ah:a:biah?

CONUNDRUM:9

Engineer ‘’Ali: Mirza: of Jhelum City [Town if he persists it to be] presents a number of traditions in his
attempt to accuse Saiyiduna: Mu’’a:viah RD: of a number of objectionable Acts. The question is whether
Engineer ‘’Ali: Mirza: of Jhelum includes all of them in Sins or Transgressions Of Divine Law or some of
these acts in Sins or Transgressions of Divine Law or none of them in Sins and in Transgressions of Divine
Law?

CONUNDRUM:10

If Saiyidatuna: ‘Abu: Balr RD: IS NOT IN ‘Ahlun Bait but Saiyidatuna: ‘’Ali: is in ‘Ahlul Bait then does it
mean that one Who is not an ‘Ahlul Bait [People of the house] is ‘Afd:al [More Virtuous ] then one Who
is an ‘Ahlul Bait?

If Saiyidatuna: ‘Abu Bakr and Saiyidatuna: ‘’Umar [RD: FOR EACH ONE OF THE TWO] ARE Not Maula:
(Gh:airu Maula and Saiyidatuna: ‘’Ali: is Maula: then does it mean that Those who are not Maula: are
‘Afd:al than one who is Maula:? [Ghairu Maula: ‘Afd:al Min Maula:].

Page 4 of 8
 Page 5 of 8

CONUNDRUM :11

If a person who claims to be a Muslim and believes in the finality of Prophethood of Holy Prophet, but
believes that Holy Prophet is constituted of Created body, Created Spirit/Soul [Ru:h:] and Uncreated
Divine Light , then is this person a Muslim or not ?

CONUNDRUM:12

If a person believes that Saiyidatuna: ‘’Ali: is God Incarnate or Incarnated God yet claims to be a Muslim

, is such a person a Mushrik,? In case if he is , then the question is :’’ Is he a Muslim and a Mushrik
simultaneously in each of the following two cases:-

Case one: He declares all those Muslims who do deny that Saiyiduna: ‘’Ali: is NEITHER God Incarnate
NOR Incarnated God as Kafir.

Case two: He declares all those Muslims who do deny that Saiyiduna: ‘’Ali: is NEITHER God Incarnate
NOR Incarnated God as MUSLIMS regardless of Muslims declaring him as Kafir or not.

CONUNDRUM :12

If a person believes that Saiyidatuna: ‘’Ali: is Omnipotent [‘Al Mukh:ta:r ‘Al Kull /All Authorative ] yet
claims to be a Muslim

, is such a person a Mushrik,? In case if he is , then the question is :’’ Is he a Muslim and a Mushrik
simultaneously, in each of the following two cases:-

Case one: He declares all those Muslims who do deny that Saiyiduna: ‘’Ali: is Omnipotent as Kafir.

Case two: He declares all those Muslims who do deny that Saiyiduna: ‘’Ali: is Omnipotent MUSLIMS
regardless of Muslims declaring him as Kafir or not.

CONUNDRUM:13

If a person believes that Holy Prophet is Omnipotent [‘Al Mukh:ta:r ‘Al Kull /All Authorative ] yet claims
to be a Muslim, is such a person a Mushrik,? In case if he is , then the If a person believes that Holy
Prophet is Omnipotent [‘Al Mukh:ta:r ‘Al Kull /All Authorative ] yet claims to be a Muslim

question is :’’ Is he a Muslim and a Mushrik simultaneously, in each of the following two cases:-

Case one: He declares all those Muslims who do deny that Holy Prophet is Omnipotent as Kafir.

Case two: He declares all those Muslims who do deny that Holy Prophet is Omnipotent MUSLIMS
regardless of Muslims declaring him as Kafir or not.

Page 5 of 8
 Page 6 of 8

CONUNDRUM:14

If a person believes that Holy Prophet is Omnipresent [‘Al H:a:d:ir Van Na:z:ir] yet claims to be a Muslim

, then the question is as follow :-’’ Is he a Muslim and a Mushrik simultaneously, in each of the
following two cases?:-

Case one: He declares all those Muslims who do deny that Holy Prophet is Omnipotent as Kafir.

Case two: He declares all those Muslims who do deny that Holy Prophet is Omnipotent MUSLIMS
regardless of Muslims declaring him as Kafir or not.

CONUNDRUM:15

Does Engineer ‘’Ali; Mirza: believe that S:iddi:q Di:n Da:r a Ka:fir or Muslim?

CONUNDRUM:16

A]If a person says that Holy Prophet is in God and as Holy Prophet is in God he is not a God beside God ,
since any one in God cannot be beside God, then the question is whether this person is a Muslim or a
Kafir , Mushrik or Muvah:h:id or a Muslim amd Mushrik simultaneously?

B] The question is if any One who believe that Holy Prophet is ‘Ah:mad without Mi:m , where he explains
Mi:m as Incarnation or Manifestation in Human Nature, is a Muslim or not? If a Muslim then a Muslim
and a Mushrik Simultaneously?

CONUNDRUM:17

Does Engineer Of City Of Jhelum whose Proper Noun is Muh:ammad ‘’Ali: Mirza: believe that the
traditions of Barking of dogs at the place of H:u’-bb prove that the act of Saiyidatuna: ‘’A:’ishah RD: has
committed a Sin or a Trasgression of Divine Law?

[Na’’u:dh:ubillah].

18] Does Engineer ‘’Ali: Mirza: believe that when Saiyidatuna: Fa:t:imah RD: became angry on Saiyiduna:
‘Abu: Bakr RD: ON LISTENING THE TRADITION DIRECT FROM Saiyidatuna: ‘Abu: Bakr RD: that Prophets
do not inherit , as a Sin or a Transgression or an act of denouncing of H:adi:th: OR JUST AN ERROR OF
‘IJTIH:A:D?

Page 6 of 8
 Page 7 of 8

In case if Engineer ‘’Ali: Mirza: considers that it is an act of denouncing of a H:adi:th: then is that a
Transgression of H:adi:th: ?

[Na’’u:dh:ubillah].
CONUNDRUM 19

Is absence of proof is a proof of absence?

If not then does Engineer |Ali: Mirza: believe that their might be some
Transgressions of Saiyiduna: ‘’Ali: [RD:] yet they are not reported in the
Texts of S:AH:I:H Traditions?

[Na’’u:dh:ubillah].
If yes then this means that SAIYIDUNA: ‘’Ali is Sinlees,

But in this case Enginieer ‘’Ali: Mirza of Jhelum is asked to differentiate

between a Sinless and an Infallible?

Disclaimer

The author is not responsible for any change of meaning

due to typing errors

Page 7 of 8
 Page 8 of 8

Page 8 of 8