Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
AVO PART
May 2018
Course Lecturer:
Education Background:
1. PhD. (Geosceinces) Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (2015)
2. MSc. (Applied Geophysics) Institute Teknologi Bandung (2002)
3. BS (Geophysics) Universitas Indonesia (1998)
Working Experience:
1. Senior Lecturer, UTP (1 Year)
2. Postdoctoral Researcher, UTP (1.5 Years)
3. Lecturer, State University of Jakarta (10 years)
Projects :
1. Hydrocarbon Prediction and Lithology Discrimination
2. AVO Analysis and EEI
3. Seismic Inversion(Post, Pre-stack)
4. Seismic Attributes & Spectral Decomposition analysis
5. Well log analysis
6. Quantitative Interpretation
Registered Patent:
PREDICTION OF PETROPHYSICAL PROPERTIES FOR
RESERVOIR MODELING
Software skill:
1) HRS 2) Jason Inversion software 3) Rockdok 4) OpenDtect 5) Tseral 5)
Matlab 6) Seismic Unix etc…
Course Learning Outcomes (CLO)
On the completion of this course, the students should achieve the following
learning outcomes:
3. Seismic Inversion
Breakdown
Course Work Quizzes 5%
Tests 20 %
Assignments 10%
Lab Reports 15%
Patient B
Patient C
Case 2
Patient B
Patient C
Patient A
SEISMIC METHOD
B E
C
D
SEISMIC RECORD (WHERE IS HYDROCARBON ?)
Seismic wave
Frequency content?
SEISMIC WAVE
16
17
SEISMIC VARIABLES & ITS ATTRIBUTES
Resolution PHASE
Thin beds/Tuning
Channel Seismic well match
detection Discontinuity faults
FREQUENCY Unconformity
All seismic attributes are linear combination of these three basic variable. While
interpreting seismic data use has to be made of all information derived from these attributes
PHYSICAL FACTORS
AFFECTING SEISMIC
SEISMIC ATTRIBUTES
21
Amplitude Versus Offset (AVO)
Vp1, Vs1, Rho1
Rc (𝜃) = A + B sin2𝜃 Vp2, Vs2, Rho2
Brine
A= intercept, f(Vp,Vs,)
B= Gradient, f(Vp,Vs,)
Vp1, Vs1, Rho1
22
23
AVO Crossplot
S
h
a
l
e
T
re
n
d
Gradient
OIL
K
-s
a nd
Fluid
Factor
Intercept
24
Elastic Properties - Rock Physics:
Environment : Temperature;Pressure
Matrix properties : Minerals;Minerals
distribution; Porosity;pore
structure
Pore Fluids : Fluidtype;saturation;Fluid
distribution
Wave frequency : Dispersion
Bulk density :
Vp=1.16 Vs + 1.36
• Vp and Vs in km/s
• Assume 100% water
Gassmann Fluid Substitution
and AVO modeling
Brine
Vp, Vs,
Oil Rho
Gas
28
29
Different gradient
Stochastic AVO Modeling
Simple
SimpleInterface Model––75%
InterfaceModel 75%Sand
SandFraction
FractionCase
Case Simple
SimpleInterface Model––30%
InterfaceModel 30%Sand
SandFraction
FractionCase
Case
31
(Deva P.
Ghosh,2009)
32
33
GR Vp/V
s Hard shale Hard shale
on soft shale on oil sand
The ratio of P-wave velocity with shear-wave velocity can provide information about
the type of lithology.
Poisson’s ratio (σ) characterizes the relationship between Vp and Vs of material,
which can affect the P-wave reflection coefficients (brine-saturated sand has higher
Poisson’s ratio compared to gas-saturated sand).
Lambda-Rho and Mu-Rho are combined to distinguish the fluid and lithology
(hydrocarbon anomalies are associated with high values of Mu-Rho and low values
of Lambda-Rho).
35
P-Impedance
Others
S-Impedance Elastic
Properties
Density
Full Stack Inversion Workflow
Elastic Impedance Workflow
Simultaneous Inversion Workflow