Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Table 2.1 Determining the compression factor and the fugacity coefficient by direct calculation.
Equation of State Trial Pressure Temperature a value b value Compression factor, Z Fugacity, ø
Trial 2
Redlich-Kwong Trial 1
Trial 2
Table 2.2 Determining the compression factor and the fugacity coefficient using the molar volume from the Newton- Raphson method.
Parameter Trial
Trial 1 Trial 2
Pressure
Temperature
b value
Molar volume, V
Compression factor, Z
Fugacity, ø
Table 2.3 Determining the fugacity coefficient at different temperatures using the Simpson’s method.
Width of rectangle
Length of rectangle
Area of rectangle
Mass of rectangle
Fugacity, ø
Direct Calculation
Newton- Raphson
Simpson’s Method
Weighing Method
Table 2.6 Accuracy of each equation of state in determining the fugacity coefficient value using the Simpson’s method.
Redlich-Kwong
Table 2.7. Fugacity coefficients at different temperatures and pressures using direct calculation.
Temperature, K EOS Pressure, x105 Mass curve, Mass std. Area under Area std. Φ
Pa g rectangle, the curve rectangle
g
empirical
VDW
RK
empirical
VDW
RK
empirical
VDW
RK
empirical
VDW
RK
Table 2.5 Comparison of the Newton-Raphson Φ values to the true value (from direct
calculation) for Van der Waals.
Temperature, K Pressure,x105 Pa True Value (direct Newton-Raphson % Error
Calculation) Values
Table 2.6 Comparison of the Weighing Method Φ values to the true value (direct calculation)
for Van der Waals and Redlich-Kwong EOS.
Temperature, K Pressure, x105 Pa Direct calculation weighing method % error
VDW RK VDW RK VDW RK
Table 2.7 Comparison of Simpson’s Method Φ values to the true values (direct calculation).
Temperature, K Pressure, x105 Direct calculation Simpson’s Method % error
Pa
VDW RK VDW RK VDW RK
Table 2.8 Comparison of Φ values calculated using Simpson’s Method to empirical values.
Temperature, K Pressure, x105 Empirical Simpson’s Method % error
Pa values
VDW RK VDW RK