Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Series Foreword
Chapter 3: Phylogeny of Sleep and Dreams (Patrick McNamara, Erica Harris, Charles Nunn, and
Robert Barton)
Chapter 4: Neurotransmitters, drugs and dreams (Allan Hobson + co-author David Kahn)
Chapter 7: Review of neuroimaging studies of REM sleep and dreaming (Pierre Maquet)
Chapter 10: Dreaming alterations associated with neurologic syndromes like stroke, PD, SDAT,
narcolepsy (Sanford Auerbach)
Chapter 11: REM-related dreams in REM behavior Disorders and REM parasomnias (Maria
Livia Fantini)
Chapter 12: NREM and REM physiology and dream content (??Tore Nielsen??)
Series Foreword
Chapter 2: Realistic Simulation and Bizarreness in Dream Content: Past Findings and
Suggestions for Future Research (G. William Domhoff)
Series Foreword
Chapter 2: Dreams as generators of cultural artifacts: the case of dreams in Literature (Carol
Ruphrecht)
Chapter 7: Costly Signaling Theory of Dreams (Patrick McNamara, Erica Harris, and Anna
Kookoolis)
Chapter 11: Threat simulation theory (Katja Valli and Aniti Revensuo)
Chapter 13: Neurocognitive model of dreaming (Roar Fosse & G. William Domhoff)
Introduction
Deirdre Barrett
&
Patrick McNamara
“What are dreams?” has been a perennial question for philosophers and for ordinary
dreamers throughout history. Over the last century, it has also become a focus of scientific
inquiry. In 1985, Tore Nielsen surveyed scholarly dream articles published over the previous one
hundred years and found that they contained two large waves of activity (Nielsen, 1985). The
first began immediately after the publication of Freud’s The Interpretation of Dreams
(1900/1965). This surge consisted of clinical articles. Though Freud’s ideas about dreams are
often said to be “discredited,” he actually introduced the characterization that dreams are
predominately visual, metaphoric thought often linked to mental processes outside conscious
awareness. This is now widely accepted and not thought of as “Freudian.” It was Freud’s
emphasis on “wish fulfillment” of primitive sexual and aggressive urges as the overriding
motivations in dreams which psychology has discarded. Freud also believed that dreams
occurred only when a conflict arose whereas research has come to show that we dream regularly
through the night and recall only a fraction of this. Research showing the average dream is the
negative side of neutral (Hall & Van de Castle, 1966) similarly made a central role for wish
fulfillment more vulnerable to Occam’s razor. The more extreme and obviously erroneous
psychoanalytic assertions are often cited as having discouraged scientific researchers from
The next wave of publications came as a physiologic one when Rapid Eye Movement (REM)
sleep was discovered. Aserinsky & Kleitman (1953) observed that the brain, cardiovascular, and
5
respiratory systems became more active at approximately 90 minute intervals through the night.
This corresponded with the timing of awakenings likeliest to result in a dream report. There were
high hopes that this discovery might shed light not only on dreaming, but on personality and
mind/brain controversies in general. Though subsequent studies added much detail to the portrait
of REM and its cycling with other stages of sleep, initially they did not impact clinical or
cognitive knowledge of dreaming, much less other aspects of psychology. The physiologic
researchers didn’t combine their research with the type of detailed content studies in which
clinicians are interested. The tone of their articles often implied that all interesting questions
about dreams had had been solved by describing the physiological processes of REM. In 1979,
The fact that sleep researchers have thus emphasized the biological substratum
has given rise to a curious paradox: despite the monumental achievements in sleep
principally from clinical practice and psychoanalysis—as if REM had never been
discovered. In brief, the technological breakthrough of the fifties and sixties has
had relatively little impact on our understanding of dreaming. (Fiss, 1979, p. 41)
Over the last two decades, however, there has been more cross-fertilization of content and
physiologic studies of dreaming. The technology has advanced so that researchers can identify
the biochemistry and neuroimaging of the dreaming brain in enough detail to relate it to what is
known about the psychological functions of these specific areas. Clinical and cognitive
researchers have also begun comprehensive studies which tie into physiological findings. The
subjective and physiologic data on dreaming are finally beginning to inform each other. New
6
dream research has become relevant to helping clinicians treat post-traumatic stress and anxiety
disorders. It is becoming a tool for cognitive psychologists studying the orienting response and
memory. Dream studies are beginning to tell us more about brain development—both across
The New Science of Dreaming brings together this exciting new body of research. The
volumes are organized around three broad themes: neurophysiological research; dream content
REM sleep, but also including non-REM dreams and the differential aspects of REM most linked
to dream characteristics. In Chapter 1, Claude Gottesmann surveys the history of research on the
physiology of dreaming sleep. He begins with researchers some two centuries ago who noted
isolated signs of REM without fully identifying it and follows this through the latest discoveries
on biological characteristics of the state. In Chapter 2, Patrick McNamara, Charles Nunn, Robert
Barton, Erica Harris, and Isabella Capellini describe the phylogeny of REM and NREM and at
what point in evolution a process analogous to dreaming may have arisen. Using REM sleep as a
proxy for the dreaming brain/mind, McNamara et al. find that REM is most prominent in
terrestrial, placental mammals and only occurs bi-hemispherically. NREM, on the other hand,
can occur in a single hemisphere. Thus the evolution of REM sleep may be tied to the evolution
of brain structures like the corpus collosum that facilitate inter-hemispheric transfer of
information. In Chapter 3, Allan Hobson discusses cellular and molecular models of dreaming
and how they account for such formal dream features as sensorimotor hallucinosis, delusional
7
errors of state identification, emotional intensification and memory loss. In Chapter 4, Hobson
Schwartz, and Pierre Maquet review neuro-imaging studies of REM sleep. The emerging picture
reveals activation of the pons, the thalamus, temporo-occipital and limbic/paralimbic areas
(including the amygdala), along with a relative quiescence of dorsolateral prefrontal and inferior
parietal cortices. The authors note that these correlate well with observed cognition during
dreaming. In Chapter 6, Edward Pace-Schott focuses in more detail on one of these findings--
the frontal lobes’ diminished activation during REM--to account for many dream characteristics.
In Chapter 7, David Kahn discusses how biochemical differences during REM decrease access to
discontinuity and illogical thinking. In Chapter 8, Erin Wamsley and John Antrobus describe
their “Dual Rhythm” model of dreaming which suggests that both the REM-NREM cycle and
changes in cortical activation across the 24-hour cycle are sources of non-specific brain
activation supporting mentation during sleep. Maria Livia Fantini and Luigi Ferini-Strambi’s
Chapter 9 describes REM Behavior Disorder and other REM parasomnias in which movement is
disinhibited during REM and people often thrash around—apparently acting out dreams. She
discusses how the dream content interacts with the disorder. Finally, in Chapter 10, Patrick
McNamara, Deirdre McLaren, Sara Kowalczyk, and Edward Pace-Schott describe the
contrasting physiologies of REM and NREM sleep states and then report new data on dreams
associated with these two sleep states. They find that while attributions of mental states to dream
characters by the dreamer occurs in both sleep states, these ‘theory of mind’ abilities are much
G. William Domhoff reviews content studies and finds that they do not support the common
schizophrenia or delirium. He concludes that most dreams are reasonable simulations of waking
life containing occasional rare features such as distorted settings and objects, unusual characters,
inexplicable activities, strange images and metamorphoses, and sudden scene shifts. In Chapter
2, Michael Schredl examines the literature on gender differences in dreaming, summarizing the
major findings: women recall dreams more often than men; men’s dreams have more physical
aggression and work settings; women’s dreams contain more people and household objects. He
discusses how these findings map onto differences between gender roles in waking life, and
In Chapter 3, Roar Fosse and G. William Domhoff present a model of dreams as “non-
executive orienting”—suggesting that dynamic oscillations of the dreaming networks cause them
to self-organize into narrow but spatially extended corridors of attention which reach
consciousness awareness. In Chapter 4, Michael Schredl reviews the literature on dream recall
and proposes a model by which major correlates-- stress, personality, attitudes toward dreams,
sleep arousal and retrieval effects, and memory-especially visual memory--all interact to produce
the variations we observe in dream recall. In Chapter 5, Mark Blagrove looks in more detail at
the effects of personality on recall and dream content differences. In Chapter 6, Clara E. Hill and
Patricia Spangler review the history of dreams in psychotherapy and modern empirical evidence
on outcomes of dream work, including differential predictors of who benefits most. They
conclude that there is strong evidence that working with dreams in therapy is beneficial but that
more research is needed to determine the effective components. The next chapters explore
9
nightmares. In Chapter 7, Mehmet Yücel Argargün describes these as terrifying REM dreams. He
reviews the effects of trauma on dreaming. She describes post-traumatic nightmares and
discusses how other dream parameters—frequency of recall, tendency toward recurring dreams,
dreaming about the trauma or not—can predict who will recover better from trauma vs. who goes
on to experence long-lasting PTSD. In Chapter 9, Tore Nielsen & Jessica Lara-Carrasco suggest
that dreaming serves an emotional regulation function and that nightmares are expressions of this
function. They propose several possible mechanisms that may be central to emotion regulation
The last two chapters of Volume II are devoted to special types of dreams. In Chapter 10,
Stanley Krippner describes reports of strange, extraordinary, and unexplained experiences related
to dreams which have fascinated people throughout the millennia. He gives examples of beliefs
in dream precognition and divine guidance in Ancient Egypt Assyrian, Babylonian, and
Sumerian cultures, follows these beliefs through Tibetan Buddhist, Hindu, and Native American
traditions and then reviews modern parapsychology research on dreaming. In Chapter 11,
Stephen LaBerge reviews the research on ‘lucid dreaming’—dreams in which the dreamer
realizes that they are dreaming. He describes the first volitional signaling by eye movements
from a lucid dream which established that they were indeed occurring in REM, and he reviews
the research on characteristics of REM which make lucidity more or less likely as well as
Volume III presents cultural and theoretical perspectives on dreaming. This includes the
perspectives of disciplines quite distinct from psychology. It also covers new psychological
theories—many of which arise from the new field of evolutionary psychology. It begins with
looks at the perspectives of ethnography, religion, and literature. In Chapter 1, Carol Rupprecht
suggests that dreaming is the earliest form of human creativity and that literature made its first
appearance when dreams went from being narrated orally to being written down. In Chapter 2,
Roger Lohmann describes how ethnography views dreams content, interpretation, and use in
terms of cultural values, categories, expectations, and social conventions. In Chapter 3, Kelly
Bulkeley surveys the role of dreams in Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Judaism, Hinduism and
the local spiritualities of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. He then presents his own research
on dreams which the dreamer identifies as a mystical or religious experience. He concludes that
mystical dreams may serve as “spirit simulations” provoking greater awareness of non-human
beings and powers with whom humans may form beneficial relationships.
The next several chapters present different functional and evolutionary theories of
dreaming. In Chapter 4, Katja Valli and Antti Revonsuo suggests that the function of dreams is
“threat simulation” and perhaps simulation of other categories of events linked to survival. In
Chapter 5, Patrick McNamara, Erica Harris and Anna Kookoolis propose that REM and
dreaming are best explained by the evolutionary concept of “costly signaling.” While most
characteristics and behaviors are adaptive, some are ironically selected exactly because they
Deirdre Barrett posits that dreams are thinking or problem solving in a different biochemical
state from that of waking. She reviews research on dreams and problem solving and proposes
that specific characteristics of dream mentation are determined by which sensory modalities we
11
must monitor, the need to remain still and quiet during sleep, she suggests, but other aspects of
represent wish fulfillment to account for the same symbolic phenomena of dream imagery which
are guided by emotions which can be identified by identifying the “Central Image” of the dream.
In Chapter 9, Jennifer Michelle Windt and Thomas Metzinger trace philosophical perspectives on
dream consciousness from Aristotle’s On Dreams through Descartes’ first Meditation, Bertrand
Russell’s Human Knowledge, and finally Daniel Dennett’s modern musings on dreams. They
assert that philosophers’ skepticism about dream awareness is more than an armchair exercise of
theoretical doubt—that dreaming is a paradigm for questions about consciousness, truth, and
reality. In Chapter 10, Alan Lloyd critically reviews several evolutionary theories of dreaming
and then integrates insights from evolutionary theory with psychoanalytic theory into a fresh and
mathematical techniques from complexity theory and network theory to social interconnections
of characters in and among dreams. He reports that many dreams can be described formally as
‘small world networks’ which are networks that are connected in such a way as to facilitate
transfer of optimal amounts of information between nodes in the network. Interestingly, the
They integrate cognitive, personality and clinical issues with physiology, and prioritize questions
about dreams which we want to answer over the next couple of decades.
We believe that a real science of dreams is now on the agenda and that the essays in these
References
Aserinsky, E., & Kleitman, N. (1953). Regularly occurring periods of eye motility, and
Freud, S. (1965). The interpretation of dreams (J. Strachey, Trans.) London: Oxford University
Hall, C., & Van de Castle, R. (1966). The content analysis of dreams. New York: Appleton-
Century-Crofts.
Nielsen, T. (1985). One century of dream research. ASD Newsletter, 2(3), 1 and 3.