Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
The Stranger by Albert Camus is a story that invites the reader to a feast of
questions concerning what is and is not considered acceptable behavior among people in
society. It also wrestles with a central theme of life and death and how a person deals
with it on a personal level. Exploring deeper, can a person truly live a life with meaning
by simply only going through the repeated motions of day-to-day processes necessary for
survival in a modern society? Is a life therefore only wasted to the parameters that are
lain before us, as is a paved road with its bold, straight lines that dictate an acceptable
path? If one never explored the wilderness beyond a space of pavement, it would never
be known exactly what could have been within grasps whether it would be to an
advantage or disadvantage. All the same, it is bold to step over lines to examine the
unknown. In this particular story, the antagonist Mersault did not lead a worthwhile life.
After all, according to Socrates, “The unexamined life is not worth living.”
Beginning on the subject of love for a family and likewise the love for a
significant other or a friend, Mersault does not effectively show any kind of true
compassion for any of these. Although he may be in fact capable of examining others’
lifestyles, he has trouble when it comes to understanding between himself and the
seemingly most central people in his life. His Maman who he sent to a home for old
people is one person who he does not understand in a religious sense when he is
presented with the fact that his Maman may have had more to her life than he previously
had known. He is confronted with the fact that Maman wanted a religious funeral, but
then reflects that “Maman had never in her life given a thought to religion” (p. 6). Also,
Angela Combs
an emotional attachment. He accepts the fact that he does not love Marie, while at the
same time telling himself that he loves her body. Obviously, he only took her for what he
could get from her on a sexual level which further confused his perception of what love
really is and what it means to love another. Another big issue along this line lies with the
definition of a true friendship. When a man named Raymond who had only known
Mersault from the casual meetings in the hall of their complex asserts that “ ‘Now you’re
a pal, Mersault’ ” several times to which Mersault only replies “ ‘Yes.’ ” He then thinks
to himself: “I didn’t mind being his pal, and he seemed set on it” (p. 33). This goes to
show that he is not interested in what the word friendship really means. If one must
actually stop to ponder the question of friendship or merely give in to being friends with
another person only to achieve a mutual satisfactory stance without having inherent
knowledge of what the friendship is beforehand, then it can be assumed that the
friendship is not one of emotional attachments but rather one of physical gain.
Perhaps the strongest evidence that Mersault has not lived a worthy life lies
within a reflection he makes of life in Part Two of the book while he awaits the end of his
life from his cell in prison. When he realizes that death is a thing that is definite, he says,
“But everybody knows life isn’t worth living. Deep down I knew perfectly well that it
doesn’t much matter whether you die at thirty or seventy, since in either case other men
and women will naturally go on living- and for thousands of years. In fact, nothing could
be clearer. Whether it was not or twenty years from now, I would still be the one dying”
(p. 114). This excerpt is a powerful one in that it directly defies the Socratic view of
Angela Combs
living his life from day to day just as another face in the crowd. He does not observe the
value within an individual life but he instead views humanity as one singularly large mass
rather than that mass being composed of individually unique atoms that make up the
whole. Society would evidently be black and white if it were all uniform without any
zest. He acts as though no matter what age one dies at, that prolongation of that life by
any number of years would be worthless on a societal level since humans are physically
replaced with other humans. However, he fails to realize that another human cannot
simply compensate for another and that no other person can ever have the same exact
mindset or life that he has. Perhaps in his final moments, he discovers that his life is
indeed not worth living seeing as how he has never taken the time to give thought to go
beyond the physically obvious in his life to touch-base with the emotions. Pointing out
this central area of neglect shows he has not lived a worthy life.
Mersault is indeed a character who lived a life plagued by his lack of self-
examination. He goes through the motions of life in the areas of friendship only to say he
had friends, family only to say they were merely present, and love only for the sex.
These are all physical observations that lack the presence of any kind of emotional
encompassing. To say that Mersault did not live a worthy life is a bold statement to put
forth but given the circumstances surrounding the way in which he lived his life, it is a
label that fits his demeanor well. Observing the way one lives his life without observing
Angela Combs