Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Cristian Palomo-Ramirez
CST 300 Writing Lab
14 October 2018
The rise of the internet in the early 2000s brought about many benefits to society. All of a
sudden, people could communicate with each other across different parts of the world within
seconds. It has really revolutionized the way information is passed around each day. With these
new technologies enabling us to share instant information came new capabilities for companies
to monitor online user’s behavior and collect data about it. Thus, the big data industry was born.
And with so many aspects of life today having internet involved in some way, these companies
are able to collect huge amounts of data about all different types of things from online users. This
is the reason the big data industry is growing at such a rapid pace. A report by IBM has estimated
that approximately 2.5 quintillion bytes of data are created each day. To put it into perspective,
the industry is projected to be worth around $66.8 million by 2021, according to Information
Age (Rossi). So big data is a big deal, not only because of the huge amount of potential profit for
companies from it, but also because it is something that affects virtually all internet consumers. It
is also not only companies benefitting from this; the U.S. government also relies on much of this
type of data collected for matters such as intel on citizens they can analyze for homeland defense
purposes. Big data coming into the picture means that users of the internet sacrifice valuable
privacies that many Americans believe they should have. Because of this, many questions are
raised today about the ethics of big data companies collecting and selling information and how it
is an infringement on privacy. This issue is a tricky one because there are good argument for
both sides, and this paper will examine both sides and the ethics involved in depth.
Palomo-Ramirez 2
The first important aspect in tackling the ethics of Big Data versus privacy is to be
familiar with the stakeholders, or groups that have something to gain or lose, of each side of the
argument. In this case there are three major stakeholders: companies, the government, and users
of the internet.
As many are aware, what a company values the highest is making money. This is quite
obvious, as why would the company exist otherwise? Because of this, it is in these big
companies’ interests to obtain data collected from internet users in order to maximize profits.
The way data is used by these companies varies from company to company, but there are many
ways it can benefit a company. There are two main ways a company could benefit from data.
The first way is just collecting the data that is valuable to other companies so that they can profit
by selling this desired information to other companies that need it. The other way is to use the
data either collected or purchased from another company so they can analyze things like human
behaviors, patterns, statistics, and many other aspects and then make beneficial future business
decisions based on their analysis of said information. These potential advantages lead these
companies to make a claim of value for this data they are acquiring. According to Ciklum, a few
of the biggest ways that companies are able to analyze data to their advantage are to decrease
expenses, launch new products or services, and increase the efficiency of their current tasks
going forward (2017). These businesses also argue that their use of this data benefits their
customers’ experience, which it sometimes can. That is why companies like these are on the side
of big data, since it means more profit is at stake. They are not really worried about user privacy
The next major stakeholder in the issue is the government. The government is also able to
use the data that it collects or buys from other companies, and much like the companies they
have a claim to value for this information. In this case, however, it is not to make money but for
purposes such as homeland defense. Valuable information about people can help with the
government’s intel on matters that could put the U.S. public at risk. Because of this, the
government also has a claim of policy that they need to fulfill, since the government’s
responsibility is to make sure its citizens are safe. A lot of times the government can use this data
to manage information on particular citizens, help defend against terrorism, help shape policy,
and make public services better as well as more accessible, all based on analysis.
The final member of the stakeholders is the average internet-using citizen. With so many
internet users, many Americans fall into this category. For a lot of these internet users, they may
not even be aware that their data is being collected and distributed. To this group, collecting and
selling of this data as an infringement of privacy and violates ethical frameworks. Many also
believe that privacy is a right of the people that should be protected by the government. Not only
does their right to privacy get violated, but many of these users would also argue that they are
put at risk with their information out there as many companies have suffered data leaks in the
past. This makes the user whose data was leaked vulnerable to fraud, identity theft, or other
problems. That is why the stakeholders in this group are advocates for increased regulations to
protect user privacy and limit the amount and type of personal information that gets put out
there.
There are a lot of people opposing big data by saying that it offers no real benefit for
these businesses on top of violating privacy. Big companies and corporations have always put
Palomo-Ramirez 4
value in data analytics, but the rise of big data has revolutionized the way companies are able to
analyze data. Because of this, companies using big data are able to receive benefits that were
previously not possible. For example, a team at the MIT Center for Digital Business found that
the companies that were most data-driven, when compared to their competitors, were on average
5% more productive and 6% more profitable than the others not so focused on data analytics
(McAfee 2012). Since this new data is an asset to many of these companies, it is obvious they
stand for the pro-data side of the argument and would not like to see legislature put in place to
further protect the privacy of everyday internet users more than it already is. The companies and
other organizations that are in favor of big data use the framework of ethical egoism to justify
their position on the issue and use of the data they acquire. Ethical egoism is a framework that
strives to maintain ethical ideals while doing the best to promote one’s own self-interests.
Companies believe that using this data can then lead to them improving as a company and as a
result they would be able to provide a better overall customer experience. It is only natural that
companies will always do what is in their interest to put themselves in the best position possible.
At the same time, with loose regulations on data sharing as well as privacy policy agreements
that users normally don’t read before accepting, these businesses using people’s data justify their
The government is also benefits from the mass amounts of data that are shared today.
While for some different reasons than business, they still on the pro-data end of the spectrum and
have various departments dedicated to collecting and analyzing data such as the NSA or the CIA.
When examining the ethical framework of the government’s role when it comes to big data, it is
evident that they are taking a utilitarian approach. Utilitarian ethical framework was first
Palomo-Ramirez 5
developed by Epicurus of Samos (Brown University) and the idea that what is ethical is what
produces the most amount of good and least amount of harm. In Utilitarianism, decisions are
made based on the predicted consequences of the action would be. This applies to the
government because their goal in using this data is to produce the most good for its citizen and
ensure their well-being. Whether that data is being used for reasons such as anti-terrorism or the
shaping of policy, the government believes it has the people’s best interest in mind. The
government’s ideals also align with the deontological approach, as this is the duty-based
approach which was developed by Immanuel Kant (Brown University). The government views it
as its duty to protect and provide for its citizens to its best ability, therefore it is acting ethical
when it has its best intentions in mind for the people. According to an article on government big
data applications, “Governments expect big data to enhance their ability to serve their citizens
and address major national challenges involving the economy, health care, job creation, natural
The last of the stakeholders, the internet users, are the group that advocates for privacy of
personal information. The ethical framework that this group bases their stance on the issue is the
rights approach, which was also originated from Kant ethics (Brown University). This approach
believes that all humans are born with certain rights, and to do what is ethical is to do what
protects these rights. This group claims what these companies are doing is unethical since it
violates this right to privacy, especially when against their will. The argument could even be
made that this is a Constitutional violation. One of the more notable figures that represents this
side of the issue is Edward Snowden, a former NSA employee who infamously leaked
confidential information about a secret government surveillance program in 2013. In the wake of
Palomo-Ramirez 6
this information being brought to light, many concerns about privacy violations were raised. The
fact that the government did not disclose to its citizens that their data was being watched
contributed to widespread distrust of the government as well and gave people even more of a
When it comes to the debate about privacy versus big data, it is tricky to argue for either
side because both have valid reasonings for the position. On one hand, with so much modern
technology at our disposal as well as how fast data can travel in this day in age, it would be
foolish not to use it. Especially if it can help in our daily lives in some way, and much of the time
it does. Websites such as Amazon use data in order to make their website more user friendly, or
make suggestions about things we may like to purchase. Nowadays, many people rely on digital
maps to give them live updates on traffic. All those services plus many more use big data to
make the user experience better. On top of that they help businesses grow. A survey by TDWI
Research found that 61% of the companies that participated in the survey said that big data
helped them better target marketing opportunities (Russom 2011). Data analyzing has a lot to
offer. But on the other side of that, many citizens rights to privacy are being violated and
companies are not being held accountable. A good example was the recent Facebook data breach
in which the private information of 50 million users was exposed (Granville 2018). Events like
these only make the people more weary about their data being collected and instill distrust in
governments and corporations. At this point, technology has advanced to a level in which it
would be unreasonable to seek full privacy when using the internet. Because of this, the solution
to the existing issue of data versus privacy would have to be one in which both sides
compromise. For this to work, the businesses or government organizations dealing with this data
Palomo-Ramirez 7
need to be more transparent about it with consumers, and they also need to keep good database
security practices to ensure that the people’s private information is safe. If online users want to
keep living in the digital world where everything is fast and convenient thanks to the internet,
they are going to have to accept that some information might have to be out there, and the
likelihood of that negatively affecting them is miniscule. At the same time, online users need to
educate themselves about big data, and how some of their info may be getting collected and the
We are living in the information age. With big data analytics being so huge today and
only getting bigger, it looks like it is only going to become more a part of our daily lives. It is
because of this that we need to look ahead and set a blueprint in which data can still be collected
and analyzed in an ethical way. While this means citizens are going to have to accept that some
level of privacy will need to be given up, it is also important to set boundaries for government
and businesses utilizing this data that still preserves certain privacies. Otherwise, down the road
References
https://www.brown.edu/academics/science-and-technology-studies/framework-making-et
hical-decisions
Brynjolfsson, E. & McAfee, A. (2012, October). Big Data: The Management Revolution.
Craig, T. & Ludloff, M. E. (2011). Privacy and big data. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media.
Granville, K. (2018, March 19). Facebook and Cambridge Analytica: What you need to know as
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/19/technology/facebook-cambridge-analytica-explain
ed.html
Hopkins, Michael S., et al. (2011). Big Data, Analytics and the Path From Insights to Value. MIT
Ji-Hyong Chung, Gang-Hoon Kim, & Trimi, S.. (2014). Big-Data Applications in the
https://doi-org.library2.csumb.edu:2248/doi:10.1145/2500873
Pros and Cons of Big Data. (2018, April 04). Retrieved from
https://www.ciklum.com/blog/pros-and-cons-of-big-data/
Rossi, Ben. (2018, 3 July). Big Data vs. Privacy: the Big Balancing Act. Information Age
Retrieved from
www.information-age.com/big-data-vs-privacy-big-balancing-act-123461795/.