Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Overview: How to make the ideal blended learning program for non-graduated adults?
The blended learning program is a new program proposal for S ea to Sky Online School,
(SSO), to support non-graduated adults pursue and complete graduation requirements;
whether it is for post-secondary preparation, for personal accomplishment or both.
Blended learning differs from exclusive online learning as it involves a face-to-face
component away from home in combination with the virtual environment. Students have
some control over the learning elements of: time; place; path and pace. Each component is
connected for an integrated learner experience. (Horn and Staker, 2015).
The reason for this shift is that non-graduated adults are a high risk non-consumer group
which needs connection and support for a sense of belonging to be successful. Students in
this group often have anxiety and self-doubt associated with school and learning and find it
difficult to stay motivated. These students have various reasons for being unsuccessful in
the traditional school system; and for these reasons need ongoing mentorship, academic
advising, one on one and small group tutoring as well as personalization of course material
to suit their needs and goals. The blended model already exists for students on the regular
grad track through SSO and is effective and successful in assisting with better completion
rates and engagement. It can be argued that the same needs to exist for adults pursuing
the same goals.
2
This program would build connection with other students that may be in the same or
similar situation. The in person component of their grad program can promote
collaboration with coursework and foster collegial relationships with simple things such as
having a tea and coffee station.
Since these students do not often advocate for themselves, having regular and scheduled
access to a face-to-face teacher provides better consistency for follow through and course
completion. These students often have a short motivation timeframe in which to finish
their grad requirements, so organization of set times and place is needed to ensure
success in the program. Often, questions can be answered more effectively in person
rather than through e-mail when technology itself might be a hurdle.
In contrast to the current mostly online model, the blended program would establish
set-times and a designated teacher to ensure a reasonable timeline, promote support with
technology and course progression and increase graduations rates.
Goals:
Effective blended programs:
1. Boost student achievement through personalization
2. Provide access for out of reach courses/opportunities
3. Improve a school’s financial health
4. All of the above
(Horn and Staker, 2015. p.98).
Specifications:
3
4
Student Agency: Students are provided opportunity to create their own learning
goals and collaborate to create their specific learning plan.
Individual Mastery: Pace is set independently by the student, giving the
opportunity to work through material more rapidly when a concept is understood or slow
down when more learning is needed.
Transparency in Learning Goals: Through the personalized learning plan as well as
contact with mentors and teachers, students will have clearly defined short and long term
goals. They will have a defined path to achieve success in individual courses as well as to
complete graduation. Goals will be created alongside students, so they can take ownership
of these goals.
Students will also be given the opportunity for mentorship and positive group
experiences through our face to face sessions. These sessions would work to build
community and engagement. These are areas we think our program can work to expand
on as the program further develops and grows.
5
Autonomous: O nce a teacher has been relieved of some of their duties in the school-age
blended program, they are available to be implemented in this new program as directed by
the school principal and/or head teacher. This team consists of one to two SSO teachers, a
principal, IT staff and senior school board administration. The autonomous level is critical
for the disruptive model where there is a need to create something entirely different.
Online only for adults is not necessarily working in all cases. Designing a new program will
allow for freedom in creation of new processes and develop new priorities (Horn and
Staker, 2015. p.120). Flexibility for a rebuild of structure from the ground up can support
the needs of this group. It is acknowledged there are different goals for non-graduated
adult than mainstream students. Knowing that curriculum doesn’t have to be followed in
the same way as bricks and mortar schools allows for flexibility for to deliver personalized
programs that focus on key concepts and overall evidence of learning. This team is also
responsible for budgetary considerations and to oversee the function of program as a
whole.
Other roles of the teacher include continuing to be the online teacher and teacher of
record for the courses they create, to adapt and maintain the virtual environment as well
as to provide face-to-face tutoring and guidance. Apart from running in person “connect”
sessions, the teacher of contact and all SSO teachers will offer various virtual office hours
through the week at different times so students have the opportunity to see each teacher
and discuss their specific needs through Google Hangouts.
Teachers also need motivators to work. As depicted in Herzberg’s categorization, (Horn and
Staker, 2015. p. 177) teachers need motivators that include achievement, recognition, work
itself, advancement and growth - this program would provide many motivators for
teachers. The blended environment allows for recognition to share ideas and creates
opportunities for teachers to specialize and work in teams. (Horn and Staker, 2015. P. 179).
This program is a blend between online learning and outreach support. When teachers are
a part of the deeper redesign of the instructional model they help fulfil students’ jobs to
make progress and be successful. Teachers need to be fully invested as they are “critical to
the success of blended learning” (Horn and Staker, 2015. p.170). By effectively integrating
6
teachers into the design process, an opportunity is created. Teachers will gain experience
and knowledge about grad requirements and plans as well as facets of the non-traditional
teaching role that is unique to working with adult students.
Figure 1: A tablet being used to enhance student learning through personal feedback from
the course teacher.
7
When selecting a location to host our face to face session there are some general factors
that we considered. We would like to create a space for our students to move freely and
feel comfortable. There needs to be choice for where and how they want to work, through
“individual workstations, in learning teams, and in other breakout areas” (Horn and Staker,
2015. p.234). In order to accommodate this range of work spaces, we would ideally be
looking for a larger open area where there is the flexibility to move furniture and
computers to align with our learning goals. With cost in mind, we suggest either hosting
our face to face sessions at the Squamish Public Library or after regular classroom
dismissal in Howe Sound Secondary School’s library.
8
II.
“Many blended programs... are choosing to rearrange their furniture and physical space to
align with the principles of student agency, flexibility and choice” (Horn and Staker, 2015. p
206). An open concept room allows for easy movement of guide to help all students in
need. In order to meet the various needs of these adult learners, the physical space for this
program will be located in two different locations. One being in the library at the local high
school, where the teacher overseeing the blended non-graduated adult program works
during school hours Monday to Friday; and the other at the public library after hours. The
reason for offering the different spaces is that some students have anxiety and previous
negative associations with school, so to offer them a neutral environment will help
promote success without the possible stigmas around a traditional space and help them
pursue their education outside of work hours. For others, accessing support in a school is
not an issue- so it creates further flexibility to meet their grad requirements.
The space needs to be designed to reflect an open learning concept conducive to the
various supports and different methods of learning that will take place. Students will be
using the space for individual work time in their online courses as well as meeting with the
teacher for one to one help and perhaps collaborating with other students on similar
coursework. The mix of students working at home online and on campus allows to enroll a
greater number of students than the building optimally supports at one time
(Fueleducation, n.d.), after hours availability helps to optimize the space.
Figure 2:
This schedule depicts choice of delivery for students and combines the 24-7 access
of A la Carte courses with the Enriched Virtual model and perhaps the Flex model,
depending on the course. When the flex model is not available, virtual office hours
help support the learning of students who do not necessarily see their teacher
face-to-face.
Day of Week In Building At home Virtual Office Hours
9
Figure 3.1:
We need to work in the parameters of the existing high school and public library l
locations. Currently, the school library is in transition of becoming more of a
learning commons space which promotes more flexibility for multi-purposes.
Figure 3.2:
The public library space already establishes defined spaces for different activities.
Students can use the computers provided or use their own to work independently
or collaboratively.
10
11
Respect for learning environment At the face to face session there will be
many individuals present with a range of
needs and tasks. The communal learning
space should be kept clean and orderly.
The space will require a balance between
quiet and collaborative. Students will be
encouraged to take breaks and socialize
however they will also be reminded about
responsibilities and process. Students will
be given the freedom to develop their own
culture as long as all parties feel respected
and supported in their learning.
12
Maintenance of coffee and tea station The teacher should promote a space that
provides a welcoming atmosphere. The
face to face sessions should provide a safe
space for dialogue amongst individuals.
The teacher should maintain features such
as a coffee and tea station in order to
promote socialization and the building of
relationships.
Timely attendance of virtual office Teachers should ensure that they are
hours online 5 minutes prior and 5 minutes post
office hour so that no student is missed.
This simple addition of time shows
commitment and organization. Students
will be able to see that the course teachers
are taking their role seriously. Course
teachers should lead by example when
creating a culture (Horn and Staker, 2015).
By being punctual, students will see the
importance of committing to their learning
and respecting timelines.
13
Culture is not something that can be created overnight. There is an intrinsic desire within
us to work together to meet common goals which overtime will contribute to the
development of a healthy and rewarding school community. As with all things, time is
required for a process of trial and error as the learning community establishes what will
work for the learning space (Horn and Staker, 2015). By outlining the above priorities for
our face to face session we hope to establish positive culture norms that maintain
motivation and structure for both the students and teachers involved in our program.
Over time there could be an increase to teaching contract percentages if more hours is
involved. Tech purchases will help grow the program once it is established but it is
important to “begin by identifying the problem to solve or the goal to achieve”, (Horn and
Staker, 2015. p 97), before investment is made in technology. Horn and Staker (2015) argue
that “customization has a price tag” (p.198). Eventually, the program will increase in
enrollment and registrations will help support financial endeavours and program
investments.
Conclusion:
“Online learning helps students t o know, schools should be able to focus increasingly on
helping students t o do and to be” ( Staker & Horn, 2015 p.81). An effective blended
14
environment is more than just giving a physical space for students to work on online
courses- it enhances learning by giving a well-rounded experience that allows students
flexibility and personalization to experience course materials in a way that best suits them.
Non-graduated adults need opportunity for ongoing support both virtually and in real time.
This non-consumer group requires new initiatives to make progress, be successful and
meet their goals to graduate. We need to “rethink how schools do everything from
academic monitoring to the development of self-direction in students” (Staker & Horn, 2015
p.82). This program allows us to promote flexibility for students and boost achievement by
providing access for out of reach courses/opportunities. We can do more with less!
Key Terms:
Autonomous: “Autonomous teams can consist of any combination of school leaders/ teachers, but
generally need to be shepherded by a district administrator who can ensure real autonomy from
existing accountability structures” to create solutions for non consumption problems. (Clayton
Christensen Institute, 2017).
Blended Learning: Learning that occurs part online and part face-to-face where students have
some control over time; place; path and pace (Horn and Staker, 2015).
Disruptive Innovation: Creates a new system of learning that is completely different from the
existing structure to solve a problem where the is no alternative (Horn and Staker, 2015).
Heavyweight: “Heavyweight teams should consist of all parties involved in an educational context
to redesign the architecture and structure of the school day. ( Clayton Christensen Institute, 2017).
Non-consumer: S tudent group that is lacking in educational opportunities because schools cannot
provide the experience. (Staker and Horn, 2015 p. 105).
15
Works Cited:
Borsoff E. and Carter B. (2017). Classroom design. Figure 3.1 and 3.2 Made with:
http://classroom.4teachers.org/
Clayton Christensen Institute. (2017). Blended learning universe. Retrieved on 12.4.2017
from: h
ttps://www.blendedlearning.org/design/
Figure 1: h
ttps://www.myscript.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/pic-2-604x270.jpg
Fueleducation. (n.d.). How top performing blended learning programs use time and space
effectively. Evergreen Education Group. Retrieved on 12.4.2017 from:
http://resources.fueleducation.com/blended-learning-white-papers-guides/effective-
blended-learning-programs-paper.
Horn, Michael B., and Staker, Heather. (2015). B lended : using disruptive innovation to
improve schools. San Francisco, CA :Jossey-Bass. [Kindle ed.] Retrieved from:
https://read.amazon.ca/