Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
NP
This work was supported by the Masdar Institute of Science and ⎛V ⎞
Technology, Abu Dhabi, UAE. P= Po ⎜⎜ ⎟ (1 + k pf ( f − f o )) (1)
⎟
H. H. Zeineldin is with the Masdar Institute of Science and Technology, ⎝ Vo ⎠
Abu Dhabi, UAE (e-mail: hzainaldin@mist.ac.ae).
J. L. Kirtley is with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Cambridge, MA
NQ
⎛V ⎞
Q = Qo ⎜⎜ ⎟ (1 + k qf ( f − f o )) (2)
⎟
⎝ Vo ⎠ V
where Vo represents the initial operating voltage (rated
voltage) and Po and Qo represent the active and reactive
power corresponding to the initial operating voltage. The
parameter f and fo represent the operating and rated frequency 1 p .u
respectively. The parameter V represents the operating
voltage. NP, NQ, kpf and kqf correspond to the parameters of
the load model [10].
As mentioned earlier, the DG is equipped with a P-f and Q-
V droop characteristic as shown in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2. The P-f
characteristic is designed such that the DG delivers its
maximum power at rated frequency. In a similar manner, the Qmin Q max
Q-V characteristic is designed such that the DG supplies zero
Fig. 2. Q-V Droop Characteristic
reactive power at rated voltage. Since both the voltage and
frequency are controlled by the utility during parallel
operation, the DG would operate at unity power factor.
III. SYSTEM UNDER STUDY
During micro-grid operation, the amount of voltage and
frequency deviation will depend on the amount of active and The system under study consists of a load represented by a
reactive power mismatch, the load characteristic and the DG static load model and two inverter based DG as shown in Fig.
droop model. The P-f and Q-V droop characteristic could be 3. The distribution system was modeled by an equivalent
mathematically represented as follows source behind an impedance. Each DG is equipped with the
interface control presented in Fig. 4. The frequency and
PDG = a1 ( f − f o ) + b1 (3) voltage at the Point of Common Coupling (PCC) are measured
and through the droop characteristic the active and reactive
QDG = a2 (V − Vo ) + b2 (4) power reference values (Pref and Qref) are determined. The
power reference values are then compared with the DG output
where PDG and QDG are the DG active and reactive power active and reactive power (PDG and QDG) and the error is
output. Parameters a1, a2, b1, and b2 represent the droop passed to a Proportional Integral (PI) controller to generate the
characteristic parameters. The frequency and voltage at which current d-axis and q-axis reference values (Idref and Iqref).
the micro-grid will stabilize could be found by equating (1) Through Park’s transformation, the DG a-b-c current are
and (2) to (3) and (4) respectively as follows transformed into the d-q axis frame and are compared with the
⎛V ⎞
NP
current d-q axis reference values. The error is passed through a
Po ⎜⎜ ⎟ (1 + k pf ( f − f o )) = a1 ( f − f o ) + b1 (5) second PI controller to determine the inverter switching
⎟
⎝ Vo ⎠ signals. Table I presents the system, DG and droop
NQ
⎛V ⎞ characteristic parameters.
Qo ⎜⎜ ⎟ (1 + k qf ( f − f o )) = a2 (V − Vo ) + b2 (6)
⎟
⎝ Vo ⎠
Medium Voltage
It can be seen from (5) and (6) that deviations in voltage are
dependent on deviations in frequency and vice versa. For
constant power loads (NP=NQ=0) with no frequency
dependence (kpf = kqf = 0), the voltage deviation and
frequency deviation are decoupled.
Microgrid Isolating
Static Load
QDG
PCC frequency and voltage. Since the two DG presented in
V PCC
V
Qref this work are identical with the same droop characteristic, the
− K 'I
+ K'p +
s DG share the load equally. During grid connected operation
Q iqref Vqref both DG supply a 100 kW of active power. Since the PCC
iq
I DG a
abc −
+ Kp +
KI
s
voltage is less than 1 p.u during grid connected operation,
I DGb each DG will supply 15 kVAR of reactive power which is
KI
I DGc dq −
+ Kp +
id
s Vd ref dictated by the droop characteristic. From Fig. 5, it can be
f
Pref id ref seen that the frequency will stabilize at a value of 60 Hz and
f PCC
+
− K'p +
K 'I
s
the voltage will stabilize at approximately 0.91 per unit. This
P
PDG result coincides with the mathematical results which are
presented in Table II in the Appendix.
Fig. 4. DG Interface Control Design.
TABLE I
SYSTEM, INVERTER AND DROOP DATA
Grid Parameters
Voltage (line to line) 480V
Frequency 60Hz
Grid Resistance 0.02Ω
Grid Inductance 0.3 mH
DG Inverter Controller Parameters
k ′p = 5 k I′ = 0.07
kp = 3 k I = 0.08
a1 = −0.1 b1 = 0.1
a2 = −0.5 b2 = 0 Fig. 5. Active and Reactive power output of each DG with a constant power
load.
The load on the micro-grid was modeled using (1) and (2).
In order to examine the effect of the load model on the micro-
grid frequency and voltage deviations, the different load
parameters were varied individually while fixing the
remaining load parameters.
Fig. 8. Frequency and voltage at the PCC for different values of kpf and kqf
with NP=NQ=2.
Fig. 9. Frequency and voltage at the PCC for different values of kpf and kqf
with NP=NQ=0.
5
VII. REFERENCES
[1] IEEE Std. 929-2000, “ IEEE recommended practice for Utility Interface
of Photovoltaic (PV) Systems”, April 2000.
[2] UL 1741, Static inverter and charge controllers for use in photovoltaic
systems, Underwriters Laboratories Inc., Northbrook, IL.
[3] IEEE Std. 1547-2003, “IEEE Standard for Interconnecting Distributed
Resources with Electric Power Systems”, July 2003.
[4] R. H. Lasseter, and P. Paigi, “Microgrid: A conceptual solution”, IEEE
35th Power Electronics Specialists Conference, vol. 6, pp. 4285 – 4290,
June 2004.
[5] J. Liang, T. C. Green, G. Weiss, and Q. Zhong, “Hybrid control of
multiple inverters in an island-mode distribution system”, 2003 IEEE
34th Annual Power Electronics Specialist Conference, 2003. PESC '03,
Vol. 1, pp. 61 – 66, June 2003.
[6] J. A. Lopes, C. Moreira, and A. Madureira, “Defining Control Strategies
for MicroGrids Islanded Operation”, IEEE Transcations on Power
Systems, vol. 21, No.2, pp. 916-924, May 2006.
Fig. 10. Frequency and voltage at the PCC for different values of kpf and kqf [7] S. Barsali, M. Ceraolo, P. Pelacchi, and D. Poli, “Control techniques of
with NP=NQ=3. Dispersed Generators to improve the continuity of electricity supply”,
IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting, Vol. 2, pp. 789 - 794,
2002.
[8] F. Katiraei, and M. R. Iravani, “Power Managemnet Strategies for a
V. CONCLUSIONS Microgrid With Multiple Distributed Generation Units”, IEEE
This paper examines the effect of the load’s voltage and TRanscations on Power Systems, vol. 21, no.4, pp. 1821-1831,
Nov.2008.
frequency dependence on micro-grid operation for inverter [9] C. Moreira, F. Resende, and J. Lopes, “ Using Low Voltage MicroGrids
based distributed generation. An exponential load model with for Service Restoration”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 22,
both voltage and frequency dependence was modeled. The DG no.1, pp. 395-403, Feb. 2007.
[10] IEEE Task Force on Load Representation for Dynamic Performance,
interface control was equipped with a P-f and Q-V droop ‘Load representation for dynamic performance analysis’. IEEE
characteristic. The results and analysis show that the Transactions on Power Systems, Vol.8, No.2, pp. 472-482, May 1993.
frequency deviations and voltage deviation during micro-grid
operation are dependent on each other. Although the micro- VIII. BIOGRAPHIES
grid load could be within the available DG capacity, unstable
operating conditions could occur as a result of the load’s H. H. Zeineldin received the B.Sc. and M.Sc. degrees in electrical
engineering from Cairo University, Egypt, in 1999 and 2002, respectively. In
voltage and frequency dependence. It is important when 2006, He received his Ph.D. in electrical and computer engineering from the
designing the DG droop characteristic to take into account University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Zeineldin worked for Smith and
different possible loading conditions and models. The Andersen Electrical Engineering Inc. where he was involved with projects
involving distribution system design, protection and distributed generation.
6