Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Fall 2014
MANDATORY QUESTION
3- Efficiency: (4 Marks)
• Governments have often seen private organizations as being more efficient
than public ones. The latter has promoted public-private partnerships
(collaboration).
• Four different perspectives on efficiency:
• Efficiency stems from the notion of economies of scale
• Efficiency related to outsourcing activities (example: companies may
outsource support activities such as cleaning and catering to other
companies who can gain economies of scale)
• Operational efficiency: many purchasing and supply chain alliances
are of this sort. Purchasing companies gain efficiencies by ensuring
that the delivery of product is done on time and as per the agreed
price. Supplying organizations gain efficiencies by having a relatively
predictable market.
• Coordination of services as to avoid duplication and thus ensure
efficiency
4- Coordination and Seamlessness: (4 Marks)
• As seen above, coordination is an important element to achieve efficiency.
• Coordination is the act of organizing, making different people or things work
together for a goal or effect to fulfill desired goals in an organization.
Coordination is a managerial function in which different activities of the
business are properly adjusted and interlinked.
• Yet, coordination and seamlessness are not always inter-related:
• Repetition (duplication of an activity)
• Omission (leaving gaps in activity)
• Divergence (diluting activity across a range of activities)
• Counter production (pursuing conflicting activities)
are pitfalls obstructing collaboration.
5- Learning: (4 Marks)
• Basis of collaboration pursue joint activities Mutual learning
• Example: staff from automobile industry acting as trainers for their suppliers
of components/parts
Goals outcomes are not always positive. Some negative side effects are associated with
goal setting such as:
- A narrow focus that neglects non-goal areas,
- Distorted risk preferences,
- Rise in unethical behavior
- Inhibited learning
- Corrosion of organizational culture
- Reduced intrinsic motivation
Consequently, goal setting needs to be regarded as a prescription-strength medication
that requires careful dosing, consideration of harmful side effects, and close
supervision.
As such, goal setting has been promoted as an answer to improve employee
motivation and performance in organization.
With goals, people narrow their focus on the specific task required and hence
outcome expected. Such intense focus will “blind” people from other important issues
that appear to them unrelated to the goal
Tendency to focus too narrowly on goals is compounded when managers plan the
wrong course by setting the wrong goal (e.g. setting revenue instead of profit goals).
Consequently, setting the correct/appropriate goal is a difficult process.
When managers set specific goals, they often fail to determine the broader
results of their directives. The presence of goals might lead employees to focus
on short-term gains and lose sight of potential devastating long-term effects on
the organization.
Goal setting is seen as a powerful motivation tool yet; it can lead and promote
unethical behavior.
Goal setting can promote two different types of cheating behavior (unethical
behavior):
o When motivated by a goal, people may choose to use unethical
methods to reach it. Example: at sears, and in order to reach the
specific, challenging goal set by the administration, employees charged
customers for unnecessary repairs
o Goal setting can motivate people to report that they have met the goal
when in fact they fell short. Example: employees from a certain
organization who were driven to reach sales target reported sales that
never took place.
Goal setting is not the only cause of employee unethical behavior. It is an
important ingredient but other aspects interfere as well:
o Lax oversight
o Financial incentives for meeting performance targets
o Organizational culture with a week commitment to ethics.
The interplay between goal setting and organizational culture is extremely
important.
o An ethical organizational culture can restrain in the harmful effects of
goal setting, but at the same time, the use of goals can influence
organizational culture.
o Given that small decisions within an organization can have broad
implications for organizational culture, the aggressive goal setting
within an organization increases the likelihood of creating an
organizational climate ripe for unethical behavior.
Discussion of purpose can be the main agenda item of a meeting or can take
place implicitly, perhaps over a prolonged period, as an inevitable implication
of the process seeking to reach agreement about what to do.
Aim Ownership:
During negotiation, each member of the group uses their knowledge and
interpretation of what they take be the aims of the organization.
• Organization aims (5 Marks): Since collaborations are set up by individuals
acting on behalf of organizations, the aims of their organizations are likely to
be particularly relevant to the negotiation of collaborative purpose. Group
members may, or may not, presume to have complete knowledge of these
aims. The organizations aims may, or may not, connect to the original or
officially stated purpose of the collaboration leading consequently to the fact
that these aims are often viewed as part of the “hidden agenda”.
• Individual aims (5 Marks): Each group member also brings to the process of
negotiating the purposes of the collaboration, an individual set of personal
values and constraints, and hence aims. Some of the individual will influence,
and be influenced by collaboration and by any discussion with the group.
Some of them will be, as the organization aims, hidden from the rest of the
group.
• Aims owned by the group (5 Marks): the process of working and negotiating
together often leads to a sense of a group identity. Aims that are therefore
owned by group, and attributed to the group, may emerge.
A. Explain the need for a focal actor in the supply chain network (9
Marks).
END OF EXAM