Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
I
nvestments in U.S. real estate by non-U.S. residents U.S. sources and is entitled only to limited deductions.
have increased in recent years due to lower interest A U.S. “resident" is defined as a foreign citizen who meets
rates and reduced tax rates on capital gains. The tax either of two tests: (i) the lawful permanent resident test, or
treatment of non-residents buying and selling U.S. (ii) the substantial presence test. A foreign citizen who is a
real property is different in significant ways from the usual lawful permanent resident under U.S. immigration laws is
tax treatment of non-residents investing in or conducting considered a resident for U.S. income tax purposes. Under
business in the United States. This article discusses: (i) the the substantial presence test, a foreign citizen will be consid-
general U.S. tax rules that apply to non-residents investing in ered a resident for tax purposes if:
the United States, (ii) how the Foreign Investments in Real
Property Tax Act affects the tax treatment of investments in (a) The foreign citizen is physically present in the United
real estate, and (iii) the available structures for non-U.S. in- States for at least 31 days during the current calendar
vestors buying and selling U.S. real estate. year, and
OVERVIEW OF TAXATION OF NON-U.S. RESIDENTS (b) The sum of the number of days of presence during
the current calendar year, plus one-third of the days in
The U.S. tax treatment of a foreign citizen depends on the United States during the first preceding calendar year,
whether the non-U.S. investor is a resident or a non-resident of plus one-sixth of the days in the United States during the
the United States. A foreign citizen who is resident in the second preceding calendar year, equals or exceeds 183
United States is taxed on worldwide income similar to a U.S. days.
citizen. When computing taxable income, a resident is
generally entitled to claim the same deductions and personal Effectively Connected Income. If a non-resident is en-
exemptions available to a U.S. citizen. By contrast, a non- gaged in a U.S. business, all items of income which are effec-
resident generally is taxed only on his or her income from tively connected with such business (“effectively connected
income” or “ECI”), less deductions attributable to such in-
come, are subject to federal income taxation at ordinary tax
rates.
1. Effectively Connected Fixed Determinable,
Annual or Periodical Income. ECI that is “fixed determin-
able, annual or periodical” (“FDAP”) income, such as inter-
est, dividends, rents, or royalties, earned by a non-U.S. inves-
tor or foreign corporation is subject to tax, with appropriate
deductions, at ordinary rates. To avoid withholding on such
income, a person conducting a U.S. trade or business will be
required to file certain forms with withholding agents each
year.
2. Non-Effectively Connected FDAP Income. Unless
reduced by treaty, non-U.S. investors and foreign corpora-
tions are subject to a 30% withholding tax on most items of
U.S. source FDAP income that is not ECI.
- The items disposed are shares of a domestic corporation tax withheld offsets the amount of tax that the non-U.S. in-
that provides an affidavit that such domestic corporation vestor actually owes on the sale of the property. If an indi-
has not been a USRPHC during the testing period; or vidual owns and disposes of the property within 12 months
- A personal residence is acquired by an individual pur- of acquiring the property, the individual will be subject to tax
chaser for use as his or her residence and the amount re- at the higher ordinary tax rates.
alized does not exceed $300,000, or $500,000 in the case Holding Period. The holding period for determining
of married individuals filing jointly. whether capital gain qualifies as long-term does not begin un-
Election to be Treated as Domestic Corporation. Gen- til title passes to the property, rather than merely making an
erally when a non-U.S. investor disposes of a USRPI, the earnest money contract payment. Such considerations
buyer must deduct and withhold tax equal to 10% of the should be taken into account if a non-U.S. investor is consid-
gross amount realized on the disposition. In some circum- ering reselling the real estate shortly after acquiring it.
stances, a foreign corporation that disposes of a USRPI may STRUCTURING INVESTMENT IN U.S. REAL ESTATE
make an election to be treated as a domestic corporation for The choice for non-U.S. investors structuring investments in
withholding tax purposes. U.S. real estate is typically between direct ownership by an
Upon making this election, the foreign corporation could individual and ownership by a domestic or foreign corpora-
avoid the 10% withholding on disposition of the USRPI. tion.
The foreign corporation would still be liable for corporate Direct Ownership by Non-U.S. Investor.
income tax on the disposition of the USRPI, but the corpo-
rate income tax may be less than the withholding 10% of the Upon the sale of long-term capital assets, a non-resident indi-
gross proceeds. The payment of the corporate tax would be vidual would pay U.S. income tax at a maximum rate of 15%.
deferred until the due date of a regular estimated corporate Direct ownership by an individual will not result in dividend
income tax payment. withholding tax or BPT, because those taxes only apply to
corporations.
Determining the Tax owed; Capital Gain Rates. As
stated above, the withholding tax is the mechanism for the The two disadvantages of direct ownership by an individual
IRS to collect taxes, but does not represent the final determi- are: (i) the requirement that the non-U.S. investor file a U.S.
nation of the amount of tax owed on a sale of the property income tax return, and (ii) the exposure to U.S. estate tax.
by a non-U.S. investor. For property held for more than 12 The filing of a U.S. income tax return is something that some
months, a non-U.S. person, whether an individual or business non-U.S. investors may be reluctant to do, even if the alterna-
entity, is taxed on its net gain from the sale of U.S. real prop- tive structures result in a higher tax bill.
erty at long-term capital gain rates. Ownership by Domestic Corporation. If the property
Assets held by an individual for more than 12 months are were held by a domestic corporation the corporation's in-
taxed at a maximum rate of 15% upon disposition. Assets come, both rental income and gain from the sale of the prop-
held by a corpo- erty, would be subject to tax at a maximum rate of 35%. If
ration are taxed the domestic corporation makes dividend distributions to its
at rates between non-U.S. shareholders, a withholding tax at a rate of 30%
15-35% upon would be imposed, unless reduced by treaty.
disposition. Cur- Ownership by Foreign Corporation. Non-U.S. investors
rently, there is may be attracted to foreign corporate structures to own U.S.
no rate differen- real estate which allows them to avoid filing U.S. income tax
tial for corpora- returns individually, protects against the U.S. estate tax, and
tions between gives them anonymity. This structure may, however, come
ordinary income
and capital gains. (Continued, next page)
The amount of
with a higher tax cost compared to owning U.S. real property Real Estate Business Activities. The ownership of U.S.
directly as an individual. real property by a non-U.S. investor by itself will not consti-
If income producing property were held by a foreign corpo- tute the conduct of a business in the United States. If the real
ration, its taxable income would be subject to a tax at ordi- estate investment is not treated as a business, the gross rents
nary corporate rates. Instead of a withholding tax on distribu- paid to the non-resident owner would be subject to 30%
tion, a branch profits tax (“BPT”) at the rate of 30% would withholding tax as non-ECI. Foreign corporations or non-
apply. The BPT is designed to equalize the U.S. tax treatment residents may make an election to treat their U.S. income as
between a non-resident operating in the United States ECI, and pay a tax on their net income at ordinary rates.
through a domestic corporation and a non-resident operating This election would enable the investor to deduct its real es-
in the United States through a tate business related expenses.
branch of a foreign corporation. ESTATE TAX IMPLICATIONS
Unlike the dividend withholding For U.S. estate tax purposes, the
tax, the BPT applies regardless gross estate of a non-resident
of whether earnings are distrib- consists of all U.S. property in
uted. Thus, the BPT could be which the decedent had an inter-
imposed earlier than the with- est at death. Direct ownership of
holding tax on dividends. U.S. assets, such as U.S. real es-
An interest in a foreign corpora- tate or shares of a corporation
tion is not a USRPI, regardless organized in the United States,
of how much U.S. real estate the would subject the non-U.S. inves-
corporation owns. The sale by a tor to U.S. estate taxes if the in-
non-U.S. investor of shares in a vestor still owns such assets at
foreign corporation that owns a the time of his or her death.
USRPI is completely exempt STATE AND PAYROLL TAXES
from U.S. income taxation. The disadvantage of holding U.S.
property in a foreign corporation is that it may be difficult to This article has not addressed any state taxes on the disposi-
convince a buyer to purchase shares of the foreign corpora- tion of real property interests or state or federal payroll taxes
tion in order to acquire the underlying property. The buyer related to employees in the real estate business. These issues
likely would be buying stock of the foreign corporation with should be addressed with your tax counsel before finalizing
a built-in U.S. tax liability and would probably insist on a re- any transaction or implementing any business plan.
duced purchase price for the shares. CONCLUSION
Holding U.S. property through a foreign corporation is more The best choice for structuring investment in U.S. real estate
common when the property is expected to be owned by a will depend on a number of factors and depend on the
family for multiple generations. Because no sale is anticipated unique circumstances of each individual investor, but the
for many years, the difficulty in finding a willing buyer would complex tax rules in this area should always be included
be put off to a later date. among the factors considered before finalizing any invest-
ment structure.