Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Introduction
Snap-fit designs are the simplest, quickest and most cost-effective method of assembling two parts. No screws. No
rivets. No welds. And, after assembly, faster disassembly and servicing of components.
Thermoplastic materials possess many characteristics and features that are ideal for snap-fit designs:
• High flexibility
• Integrative designs enabling the molding of complex geometries
• Relatively high elongation
• Low coefficient of friction
• Strength and rigidity sufficient for most applications.
Properly designed, thermoplastic snap-fits can be assembled, disassembled and reassembled several times –
without adverse effect on the functional integrity of the snap-fit. If materials are prone to relax over time, snap-fits
can be designed to self adjust and maintain sealing capability.
From the broader perspective of sustainability, snap-fit’s ease of disassembly simplifies the recycling of
components made from different materials, thereby encouraging more environmentally friendly behavior throughout
the lifecycle of components and end products.
Still, various factors keep some snap-fit designs from delivering the full benefits of their potential. BASF hopes to
help overcome such obstacles through this series of articles that will provide designers a basic overview of the
types of snap-fit designs, applications and principles, improved methods, and guidelines for avoiding common
pitfalls in snap-fit design, processing and materials selection.
The straight beam cantilever design is broadly applicable. U- and L-shaped cantilevers, on the other hand, are
specifically used in applications where space restrictions constrain beam geometry.
Cantilever structures have been around for a long time. Design engineers know them from their common use in
bridges and such architectural structures as overhangs and balconies, not to mention their popularity in single-wing
aircraft design. Applications for snap-fit cantilever designs now range anywhere from mundane tamper-proof aspirin
bottle-and-cap assemblies to highly engineered, rugged parts such as power tool housings, automotive wheel
covers, air cleaner housing and door handle assemblies to name just a few.
Traditional materials for cantilever structures – such as stone and metals – are strong and rigid. Evaluation based
solely on those two properties, however, overlooks important elements of cantilever design. Use of thermoplastics
introduces additional concepts to the mix of criteria. To take advantage of the true strengths of thermoplastics for
snap-fits, designers must factor in new considerations that are the subjects of the second and third articles of this
series:
“Principles of Classical Beam Theory and Design”
and “Improved Cantilever Design”
Part II will explore the traditional formulas for calculating cantilever stresses and strain. Part III will present
improved formulas that provide precise calculations applicable in the use of thermoplastics.
Additional information is available through the following links:
BASF Plastics Snap-Fit Design Manual
PART III. IMPROVING SNAP-FIT DESIGN: IMPROVED CANTILEVER DESIGN and GUIDELINES TO AVOID
COMMON DIFFICULTIES
the design engineer to take full advantage of a material’s strain-carrying capability and, therefore, to enjoy greater
design flexibility.Magnification Factors
BASF Plastics has developed a method for determining these magnification factors for a variety of snap-fit
beam/wall configurations, including beams with either uniform or tapered cross sections (graphically depicted in
Figures IV-1 and IV-2).
BASF has verified the results of this method both by finite element analysis and actual part testing.
Improved Formulas
To determine maximum strain at a given snap-fit’s base, design engineers can now use the improved formula which
incorporates a corrective magnification factor (See Figure IV-3). BASF also provides formulas for determining the
Push-on and Perpendicular Mating Forces (Figure IV-3).
To review examples that employ these formulas to determine accurate solutions for two different snap-fit designs,
see Figures IV-4 and IV-5. The first example incorporates allowable strain and coefficient of friction values for a
specific grade of BASF Ultradur® PBT; the second example, for a grade of BASF Ultraform® POM. Refer to
BASF’s Snap-Fit Design Manual Page IV-4 for tables providing allowable strain and coefficient of friction values for
eight different materials appropriate for snap-fit designs.
U-shaped and L-shaped Designs
Design engineers interested in the application of these formulas to U-shaped and L-shaped snap-fit designs – and
a more detailed discussion – can refer to BASF’s Snap-Fit Design Manual, Pages V-1, -2, -3 and -4.
Conclusion
The formulas developed by BASF represent a significant improvement over the classical cantilever beam deflection
and strain formulas. Working with BASF’s improved formulas, design engineers can now more accurately calculate
and predict the forces encountered – and allowable deflection limits – for different configurations of cantilever-type
snap-fit assemblies. With the greater degree of certainty these formulas provide, design engineers can get the most
of their materials and their designs.
GUIDELINES TO AVOID COMMON DIFFICULTIES
Before finalizing any snap-fit design, the design engineer should review three basic considerations:
• Stress Concentration
• Creep/Relaxation
• Fatigue.
The single most common cause of failure in snap-fits is the concentration of stress caused by a sharp corner
between the snap-fit beam and the wall to which it is attached – the normal point of maximum stress. One solution
is to incorporate a generous fillet radius at the juncture between the beam and the wall, either on both sides of the
beam or particularly on the beam’s tensile stress side (See Figure VI-1).
Another cause of failure is that, over time, creep and stress relaxation can gradually reduce the retention force
between the two components connected by a snap-fit. In some cases, lower retention force can lead to leakage
from a formerly tight seal; in others, excessive play that creates noise and vibration (or “BSR” - Buzz, Squeak and
Rumble). Ways to minimize the effects of creep and stress relaxation include designing a low-stress snap beam,
incorporating a 90° return angle to avoid bending, or increasing the land length in the area of a large return angle
(See Figures VI-2 and VI-3).
The third major cause of snap-fit failure is fatigue, or repetitive loading, primarily in applications involving
hundreds or thousands of cycles. The first, most obvious, way to avoid fatigue failure is to choose a material
known to perform well in fatigue situations. Compare different materials’ S-N curves, which show expected
number of cycles to failure at various stress levels and at different temperatures. A second way based on S-N
curves is to select a sufficient design stress level at the application’s correct exposure temperature. In the
real application, the frequency of cycles is usually a lower number than in testing, thereby providing a margin
of safety for the design.
Conclusion
There are a number of ways to overcome stress concentration, stress relaxation or creep, and fatigue. A well
thought-out design, plus the right choice of material, will allow your application to benefit from all the advantages of
snap-fit design.
“Materials Selection”
Part IV, “Materials Selection”, of the five-part series “Improving Snap-Fit Design” will provide an overview of
materials appropriate for snap-fit design and guidelines for selecting the material best suited to your applications.
The complete series of articles includes
Part I. Introduction and Overview of General Applications and Types
Part II. Principles of Classical Beam Theory and Design
Part III. Improved Cantilever Design and Guidelines to Avoid Common Difficulties
Part IV. Materials Selection Coming soon!
Part V. Processing Considerations Coming soon!
Additional information is available through the following links:
BASF Plastics Snap-Fit Design Manual