Sei sulla pagina 1di 15

The Impact of Agreeableness, Extraversion, and Independence

on Professional Skepticism: An Empirical Assessment of New


Recruits of the Indonesian Supreme Audit Insitution

Bambang Riyanto L.S.1


There as been substantial changes in the demand and regulations on
government auditors in Indonesia since 2003. Such as the types of audits that
should be peformed and the issuance of Government Audit Standards. These
changes have affect the ways government auditors perform audits their
attidues. The objective of this study is to examine empirically the impact of
independence and personal traits, agreeableness and extraversion, on
professional skepticism among auditors from the Indonesian Supreme Audit
Institution. Questionnaires are distributed to 105 auditors. A total of 101
useable responses questionnaries are used to test the hypotheses. The
results of the regressiona analysis show that independence and extraversion
affect professional skepticism positively. These findings have important
implications for the Indonesian Supreme Audit Institution, the Government
Audit Standards require government auditors to maintain their professional
skepticism attitude during audit works. The positive impact of independence
on professional skepticism underscores the importance of improving
independence awareness program, one of the strategic programs at
Indonesian SAI. In addition, the positive impact of extraversion suggests that
it may be important for ISAI to pay attention to personal trait in recruiting new
auditors.

1. Introduction

Public accountants, like any any business experts, are granted professional standing
by public with the expectation that they will make important contribution to the well
being of society. They provide an assurance, or audit, service which involves a
comprehensive, indepencent, and critical examination of a subject matter with the
main objective of assessing its credibility, in order to provide assurance by issuing an
objective opinion. More specifically, as external auditors, public accountants
formulate an opinion on financial statements based on evidence gathered through
the verification of assertions associated with individual account balaces and
transaction classes (Arens et al., 2002). In this regard, maintaining skeptical attitudes
through out an audit process is one of the key elements that ensures a high quality
of audit work. Indeed, skepticism has long been recognized as a fundamental
principle of auditing in the accounting profession (Sharron and Lowe, 2008; Hurtt,
2010). Statement of Audit Standard #1 (SAS 1), the first codification of auditing
standards, promulgated the notion that that public accountants must use
professional skepticism when engaged in an audit.

1
Bambang Riyanto, CMA, PhD., Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Gadjah Mada
1
As professionals, CPAs make a promise to serve the public’s interest with an
unswerving commitment to honorable behavior, even at the sacrifi ce of personal
advantage. This promise not only sets the framework for all aspects of professional
conduct and behavior for accountants, but also establishes the expectation that as
human beings we exhibit altruistic behavior in our everyday lives.However, the failure
of public accountants to send signals to the market about the management’s wrong-
doings (frauds) properly has created distrust on the accounting profession. This so-
called audit failure that led to financial scandals in large corporations in America,
such as Enron, Adelphia, WorldCom, and Dynaco, Tyco, and, Lehman Brothers, AIG,
to name a few, involved billions of dollars loss on the part of the investors. Audit
failures, unfortunately, seem to be a global phenomenon. Examples of audit failure
that happened outside the United States are the audits of One-Tel and Harris Scarfe
(in Australia), Nortel (in Canada), Parmalat (in Italy), and AHold (in Holland), Satyam
Computer Services (in India), Great River (in Indonesia). Many of those involved in
these scandals have been convicted and send to jail, and accounting firms have also
paid a large sum of money as penalties and compensations. In Indonesia, in 2006,
following the recommendation of the Indonesian Capital Market Authority, the
Ministry of Finance revoked the licence of JAS, a partner of local big accounting firm.
He was indicted for the failure to report properly important information in the audit of
the 2003 financial statements of Great Rivers, a garment company, that led to the
default of the company. In 2006, Great Rivers failed to meet its debt obligations to
creditors. In 2007, PMW, also a partner of a local accounting firm, was convicted for
his failures to follow strictly the professional standards in the audits of three
companies (2001-2004 financial statements). In the same year, the Ministry of
Finance also revoked the licence of DS for his failure to follow professional
standards during the audit of the financial statements of MYOH, Inc. (2002-2004
financial statements). More recently, in 2009, a local public accounting firm was
investigated for the possible involvement in a financial statements fraud of a car
dealer. The audited financial statements submitted by the company to apply for the
loan to a bank contained false information.

Many countries have responded to these public-trust-deterioriting-scandals by


initiating tighter regulations and stronger governance to promote auditors’ independe,
and reemphize the importance of skepticism. For example, the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) issued SAS 99 (2002), “Consideration of Fraud
in a Financial Statement Audit,” which addresses skepticism and emphasizes the
auditor’s responsibility to explicitly consider the possibility of fraud on every
engagement. Regulators in Indonesia followed this step. The new audit standards
issued by the Indonesian Chartered Accountants in 2010 and the first official audit
standars for governmant audit issued by the Supreme Audit Institution of the
Republic of Indonesia explicitly state that auditors should maintain their professional
skepticism attitudes when performing audits.

Despite the tighter regulations, accounting scandals still happens. The accounting
scandals in Lehman Brothers (2010) and Olympus (2011) are two recent examples.
While auditors are not the only party responsible for the financial scandals, it is not
naive to assume that these scandals might be prevented had the auditors been more
independent and more professionally skeptical in performing the audits. An important
empirical question to be addressed then what factors determine auditors to be more
an less skeptical. Based on a comprehensive literature review, Nelson (2009)
2
proposes a model of professional skepticism. The model predicts that important
determinants of professional skepticism are trait, knowledge, incentive, and
evidencial input. Carpenter and Reimers (2011) provides evidence that incentive
(partner’s emphasis on skepticism) and evidencial input (presence of fraud) affect
skeptical judgments and actions. This paper is designed to test empirically one of the
prediction in this model: the impact of trait on professional skepticism. More
specifically, it is the first paper that examine the impact of agreeableness and
extraversion (two elements of Big Five Personality traits) on skepticism. In addition, it
is often said that lack of independence is a major threat to accounting profession; it
is also an important factor that determines professional skepticim. But, thus far,
empirical evidence about the extent to which indepedence affects professional
skepticism is still very limited. The findings of this paper, therefore, will be an
important contribution to the behavioral accounting literature.

Most of the studies in professional skepticism are commonly in private sector. This
study examines factors affecting professional skepticism among auditors working in
the Indonesian Supreme Audit Institution (SAI). It should be noted that since the
amandement of the Indonesian Constitution, there has been a substantial change in
the way the governments (both central and locals) and state institutions should
manage the public funds and resources. Following the fiscal decentralization
program launched in 1999, the Paliament of the Republic of Indonesia issued four
public finance and accountability acts:

• Finance Act 2003 (Law # 17)


• Treasury Act (Law # 1) 2004
• Financial Management and Accountability Act (Law #15) 2004: this act
requires, among others, central and local governments, government agencies,
and state institutions to prepare financial statements annually.
• Goverment Auditor Act (Law #15) 2006: this act restores the independence
and autonomy of Supreme Audit Institution. This is in line with the spirit of
both the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia and the Lima Declaration of
International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI) of 1977.
This act also speficies that Indonesian SAI performs three types of audit:
financial audit (with the objective to issue opinion), performance audit, and
special purpose audits (such as fraud and forensic audits).

As required by these laws, in 2005, the Government of Indonesia issued


Governmental Accounting Standards (it was called cash-based to accrual standards,
a modified version of full accrual accounting), which was then replaced by the full
accrual accounting standards issued in 2011. Similarly, in early 2007, Indonesian SAI
also issued Government Audit Standards and Codes of Professional Conduct. These
standards should be followed by any organizations that perform audit for
governments or government insititutions. As stated in the preceding discussion, the
standards requires auditors to maintain their skeptical attitutude through out the audit
process.

3
The inclusion of professional skepticism in the New Government Audit Standard
reflects Indonesian SAI’s awareness about current important issues in audit. It
believes that professional skepticism is as important in public sector as in private
sector. In public sector, the source of fraud is not manipulation of accounting
numbers but misappropriations of asset, corruptions, and mark-ups of price. As
experienced by many developing countries, the cost of such fraudulent actions is
very expensive as they prevent these countries from enjoying satisfactory economic
growth. Fraud and corruption of any magnitude are serious threats to prosperity and
high quality of public services. Before the issuing the new audit standard, Indonesian
SAI had already introduced Core Values in its strategic plan 2: Integrity,
Independence, and Professionalism.

2. Literature Review and Hypothesis Development

There is no doubt that professional skepticism is the foundation of the public


accountant profession (see for example Hurt, 2010; Nelson, 2009; SAS #1). Most, if
not all, audit standards that have been developed across the globe require auditors
to maintain a high degree of professional skepticism when conducting audit works.
For example, SAS #1 issued by AICPA, the IAS #99, and states that auditors should
exercise professional skepticism. As mentioned in the preceding discussion, in
Indonesia, the audit standards issued by the Institute of Certified Public Accountants
and the Governmental Audit Standards issued by the Indonesian SAI require that
auditors maintain high professional skepticism attitude.

There are different perpectives and definitions of professional skepticism (see Hurt,
2010 and Nelson, 2009 for excellent reviews and discussions). In this paper,
skepticism is defined as the propensity of an auditor to postpone her/his conclusion
until she/he possesses enough evidence to support the decision. According to Hurt
(2010), this definition relates to the way auditors evaluate evidence. She (p. 153)
further argues that “With the standards stating that professinal skepticism mandates
gathering and objecitvely evaluating evidence throughout the audit, this supports the
concept that judgments must be suspended until sufficient evidence is obtained.”

Professional skepticism varies across individuals. Nelson’s model (2009) proposes


that variation of professional skepticism (judgment and decision) is explained by
personal traits, and it is affected individual’s decision. This paper tests Nelson’s
model partially. More specifically, it tests the effect of agreeableness and
extraversion, two of the big five personality traits, on skepticism among government
auditors, auditors from the Indonesian SAI. It is the first study to examine the impact
these two traits in public sector context. In addition this paper also examine the
impact of independence on skepticism. Examining the impact of independence on
skepticism at Indonesian SAI is very important considering that it has been
experiencing substantial institutional and organizatinal changes since 2005: the
amandement of the Constitution has placed the Indonesian SAI as an independent
public institution (neither a part of the parliament nor the government), and in
reponse to this independence position, it adopts new core values: independence,
professionalism, and integrity.

2
The Strategic Plan was launched in 2006.
4
The hypothesis is developed on the basis of the Festinger’s Cognitive Dissonance
Theory (1957). According to this theory, individuals have a strong tendency to pursue
consistency among cognitions that they have about the environment. Cognitions in
this regard may be in the form of beliefs, attitudes, emotions, perceptions, and
behavior. Two (or more) cognitions, such attitude and emotion, are in dissonant if the
attitude (e.g., commitment) is not consistent with the emotions (e.g., bonding with the
colleagues). Simply put, cognitive dissonance happens when a person’s behaviour is
inconsistent with hes/her cognitions. This dissonance will induce stress, feeling of
discomfort, or other unpleasant psychological tensions, which will lead to anxiety and
unhappiness. Aronson (1995, p. 178) asserts that a ‘‘state of tension whenever an
individual holds two cognitions (ideas, attitudes, beliefs, opinions) that are
psychologically inconsistent’’. It may happens in many areas of life, but it commonly
occurs in situations where an individual's behavior conflicts with beliefs that are
integral to his or her self-identity. Festingers further argues that there are three way
to avoid this unpleasant feeling, namely (1) changing cognitions; (2) adding
cognitions; and (3) altering importance. Cognitive dissonance is very important to many
forms of persuasion to alter behaviors, such beliefs, values, attitudes, and
satisfactions. For example, consider a situation in which a woman who values
financial security is in a relationship with a man who is financially irresponsible.
Sears et al. (1991, p. 157) argue that dissonance ‘‘operates much like any other
drive: if we are hungry, we do something to reduce our hunger; if we are afraid we do
something to reduce our fear; if we feel dissonance we do something to reduce it
also.’’

2.1. Independence and Professional Skepticism

Audit of financial statements is commonly defined as objective and thorough


examination of evidence with the aim of assessing the credibility of the financial
statements, in order to provide assurance by issuing an objective audit opinion. From
the perspective of agency theory, audits (conducted by public accountants) play an
important role in reducing agency costs by ensuring that the financial statements
prepared by agents are ‘free of manipulations’. In this perspective, public
accountants are independent party that play as jury to assess the ‘truthfullness of the
financia statements’. In this regard, the ability of auditors to maintain independence
in performing their audit works will pretty much determine the quality of the works.
Wallman (1996) states that independence is essential to an effective audit and the
reliability of financial information; Previt and Merino (1998) and Gramlin et al. (2010)
assert that the auditing profession rests on the foundation of independence. Indeed,
the highly publicized accounting scandars that have happened in since the early
2000s and the collapse of Arthur Andersen are mainly associated with auditors’ lack
of rigor in applying the profession’s ethical standards of auditor independence
(Gendron, 2006). Indeed, it is widely known than one of the potential causes of that
led to the mega accounting scandals is the deterioration of accountants’ ethics (i.e.,
independence); individual accountants are not rigorous in applying their profession’s
ethical standards of auditor independence. Independence requires that auditors
need to maintain emotional distance from auditees.

Gramlin et al. (2010) further argue that the independence regulations are commonly
designed to restrict financial, business, and employment relationships between
5
auditors and their clients. The aferiomentioned accounting scandals have inspired
regulators to take more precausions by requiring auditors to more aware about the
importance of independence. For example, many of the provisions of SOX
emphasize on auditors’ need to beindependent with respect to the companies they
audit. It can be expected that highly independent auditors will examine evidence and
reports audit findings objectively and ethically. In other words, auditors who follow
independent rules strictly have surely done some unethical things on behalf of clients
(public investors and creditors).

As discussed in the preceding sesion, the amandements of the constitution has


granted the Indonesian SAI with full insititutional independence; it is neither a part of
parlianment nor government. More importantly, the public finance management and
accoutability laws enacted by the Parliament during 2003-2006 specify the domain of
work and the independence the Indonesian SAI. These laws give the Indonesian SAI
full autonomy in determining the portfolio of audits, managing the human resources
(e.g., recruitment, career path, and compensation), developing audit procedures, and
other strategic areas. In this regard, ISAI may be one of the few SAI in the world that
such a high degree of independence. Most countries place their SAI either as a part
of the Parliament (e.g., USA, Australia, New Zealand) or the Government (Malaysia
and China).

Kinney (1999) argues that if independence is a core value or a strategic necessity to


auditors, it is in the profession’s best interest to remain independence, regardless the
short-term incentives to act otherwise, and this is exactly what the executives of the
Indonesian SAI’s have been doing after it is ‘regained’ its independence through the
amendement of the Constituion. In response to the dramatic changes, the Board of
the Indonesian SAI instituted new core values: Independence, Professionalism, and
Integrity. These core values have been intensively exposed to staffs and auditors
through training programs, seminars, and publications. Independence, in this regard,
is defined in terms of the legal position (vis a vis the government, the parliament, and
other legislature bodies) of Indonesia SAI, and its authority to make decisions
(without substantial intervention) in the management and budget matters. These
core values serve as the foundation of the auditors’ professional attitudes, and,
together with the Codes of Ethical Conduct, they have been intensively disseminated
to the auditors, senior officers, and employees (i.e., non-audit staffs ) through
seminars and trainings.

The success of this buy-in program of the core values is crucial to the quality of audit
works at Indonesian SAI. However, across individual auditors, the impact of the
dissemination on degree of their sense of independence may vary; the dissemination
of the core values may make some auditors to be more independent, but for some
other auditors it may not change their sense of independence. It is therefore an
important empirical issue to examine the impact of independence on the suspension
of judgment. Arens et al. (2002) and Gendron et al. (2006) assert that auditor
independence involves taking an unbiased point of view in the performance of an
audit engagement (e.g. Arens et al., 2002). Professional skepticism reflects auditors’
prospensity to postpone judgment until information or evidence provides sufficient
support for one explanation over others (Hurt, 2010).

6
Auditors’ independence is strongly associated with professional skepticism; those
who have a strong sense of independence concern more about the impact of their
work on the quality and less on the management of the instituions’ interest. Auditors
with strong sense of independence are willing to collect more evidence to make sure
that their decisions are accurate. Their strong sense of independence drive them to
treat evidence with great care and not to make decision in a rush. This is what
skeptical attitude is about.

From the perspective of the Cognitive Dissonance Theory, auditors whose sense of
independence are high will be less likely to be careless, not maitain due care of their
audit works. Highly independent auditors will be comfortable to be higly careful in
evaluatig evidence and making judgment. The unbiased, objective nature of the
feeling of independence drives them to develop strong professional skeptical
attitudes in their attempts to maitain a good balance of their multiple cognitions.
Auditors with a strong feeling of independence will have unpleasant guilty feellings
when they are not skeptical. Guilty feelings create psychological burden which leads
to unhapinness. Analogously, the less auditors’ sense of independence, the less
willing they spend more time finding evidence and to support their decisions.
Auditors who have a weak sense of independence will experience dissonance if they
are very skeptical. Dissonance brings discomfort and stressful feelings that lead to
unhappiness. One way to eliminate dissonance is to the strength of professional
attitude level in such a way so that the balance of the two cognitions are achieved.
This argument leads to the following hypothesis.
H1: Independence is postively assoicated with professional skepticism

2.2. Personal Traits (Agreeableness and Extraversion) and


Professional Skepticism

According to Myers (2007), personality reflects a person’s characteristic pattern of


thinking, feeling, and behaving. Studies have shown that individuals’ behavior of
individuals in the workplace, such as integrity, loyalty, and satisfation, to a large
extent is determined by their personality (Barrick & Mount, 1991). Indeed, as Cooper
(1998) argues, personality enable researhers identify the reasons for individuals’
different reactions to similar situations. In a similar vein, Goodstein and Lanyon
(1999) assert that personality exerts its effects on employees’ behavior by shaping
the manner in which they experiences and perceives the organizations (Goodstein &
Lanyon, 1999). This may be the reason that personality traits have been widely used
to explain individuals’ behavior, such as actions, manners, targets, and purposes
(Llewellyn and Wilson, 2003).

The Big Five personality traits seem to be one of the most popular personality used
to explain individuals’ behavior in wide variety of areas and professions. Two the the
big five traits, agreeableness and extraversion, are used to explain professional
skepticism among auditors. The agreeableness trait is people’s characteristic that is
7
associated with good-natured, easy-going, cooperative characteristicsl it reflects the
extent to which individuals are willing to sympathetic. Highly agreeable individuals
are warm, trusting, and cooperative. Barrick and Mount (1991) describe agreeable
individuals as pleasant, tolerant, warm, cooperative, and flexible. These types of
individuals are commonly friendly, easy to get along; they tend to be sympathetic and
are not hostile towards others.

Sympathetic, flexible, and tolerant auditors potentially affect the way the evaluate
evidence and make judgment about the information provided by management.
Bazerman et al. (2002) assert because of the nature of audit works have made
auditors vulnerable to familiarity bias, a type of bias whereby individuals (i.e.,
auditors) are more willing to harm strangers than somebody they know well,
especially when that somebody is the management who pay the auditors.
Agreeableness will exarcebate this bias. Higly agreeable auditors will be much more
vulnerable to familarity bias than the less agreeagle ones. Consequently, it is quite
likely that during the audit process, highly agreeable auditors will find it hard to
evaluate evidence objectively. These auditors will have a strong tendency to take
evidence provided by management at face value; they do not have a strong incentive
to collect more evidence and postpone judgments. This suggests that agreebleness
will be likely to be negatively associated with professional skepticism.

Morover, because agreeableness is also associated with trusting and tolerance, it is


not compatible with skepticism which mainly deals with suspicion and distrust.
Following the argument of the Cognitive Dissonance Theory, agreeable auditors who
value trust and tolerance will find it difficult to question the evidence provided by the
management (who prepare financial statements). Auditors have long-term, intense
interactions of the management. These interactions quite possibly build the auditors
trust to the management, which will then widen the auditors’ room for tolerance and
mutual respect. Consequently, the highly agreeable auditors will have a strong guilty
feelings and be very stressful if they are skeptical about the evidence provided by
the management. In other words, auditors with a strong agreeable nature will
experience cognitive dissoance if they have highly skeptical attitudes. Likewise, less
agreeable auditors will find it comfortable (i.e., do not suffer from cognitive
dissonance) to have highly skeptical attitudes. Therefore, there will be a negative
relationship between agreeableness and professional skepticism. This leads the
following hypothesis.
H2: Agreeableness is negatively associated with professional skepticism

Several important attributes of extraversion include assertiveness, social dominance,


ambition, tendencies toward action, sensation-seeking, and the experience of
positive affect. Costa and McRae (1992) and Bakker et al. (2006) assert that
extraversion is commonly associated with a tendency to be optimictic. Bakker et al.
further argue that extrovert are more willing to reevaluate problems and alter
opinions, and reappraise problems possitively. Quoting Dorn and Matthews (1992)
and Wattson and Hubbard (1996), Bakker et al. (2006, p. 34) state that
8
‘...extraversion tends to be associated with the use of rational, problem-solving
coping strategies and with social-support seeking and positive reappraisal.’

Analogously, it may be argued that auditors with extravert auditors are very
assertive, very rational, ambitious, sanguine. This suggests that in performing audit
work, they are willing to reexamine audit evidence again to see if they need to
change their decisions. The dominance and assertive natures imply that these
auditors have a strong ambitions to be accurate in their judgments. The will take
high pride in their profession and do their work with due professional care. The
reappraisal of problems and the rational natures reflect high degrees of carefulness
in evaluating evidence and making judgments. It may be predicted, then, that
auditors with strong extraversion scores will possess high professional skepticism
attitudes; the higher the extraversion scores, the more skeptical they will be, and vice
versa.

From the perspective of the Cognitive Dissonance Theory, extravert auditors will ‘feel
guilty’ and be cognitively disturbed if they do not do their audit works with due
professional care, because being less skeptical is against their very nature. This
guilty feeling can potentially effect negatively their mood and emotions; it will create
feeling of unhappiness. Similarly, auditors whose extraversion scores are low will not
be comfortable being very highly skeptical, because being highly skeptical requires
assertive attitude and put great care in their work, which is against their very basic
nature. In other words, auditors whose extraversion are low will experience cognitive
dissonance if they are highly skeptical.

The following hypothesis is proposed to test the impact of extraversion on


professional skepticism.

H3: Exrtraversion is positively associated with professional skepticism

3. Methods
3.1. Sample

The sample comprises of 105 government auditors attending one of mandatory


trainings required by the Indonesian SAI. The questionnaries were distributed at the
end of a session. All 105 respondents returned the questionnaries, but four of them
were not included in the analysis because they were incomplete (i.e., not all of the
questions were answered). The final sample, therefore, comprises of 101
respondents. Out of the 101 respondents, 65 were males, and 30 were females. The
9
ages of the respondents range from 22 years to 34 years, and mean age is 25.56
years. The respondents’ ages are very close to the mean; the standard deviation of
the age is 2.15 years.

3.2. Measurement of Variables


The original instrument (written in English) were carefully translated by the author.
The translated versions were then translated back to English by a colleague (who is
conversant in English). The re-translated versions were analyzed to find any
mistranslation. Minor final revisions were made before the final versions were
distributed to respondents.
 Professional Skepticism. This variable is defined as the extent to which auditors
are willing to postpone judgment until there is enough appropriate information to
make decisions (Hurtt, 2010). It follows the definition adopted by the Statement on
Auditing Standard No. 1 issued by AICPA, that emphasizes the importance of
maitaining professional skepticism in their work by gathering sufficient evidence
and waiting for persuasive judgment before making a judgment. (Hurtt, 2010).
This variable is measured by the five-item instrument of suspension judgment
developed by Hurtt et al. (2003).
 Independence in this paper is defined in terms of the core value of auditors, not
the necessary contrait (Kinney et al., 1999). It refers to the extent to which
individuals (i.e., auditors) possess mental attitude to defend their stance against
the public pressures or popularity (Wrigtsman, 1992). It is a beliefs in human
nature. This variable is measured by the instrument developed by Wrigtsman
(1992). It comprises of fourteen items (seven positively worded items, and seven
negatively worded items).
 Agreeableness refers to the extent to which individuals have a high degree of trust
to others. Costa and McRae (1992) characterize agreeableness and being
pleasant, trusting, and strong inclination to interact with others harmoniously.
Extraversion refers to individuals’ ways of dealing with their environment.
Important attributes of extraversion include assertiveness, social dominance,
ambition, tendencies toward action, sensation-seeking, and the experience of
positive affect, and a tendency to be optimictic (Costa and McRae, 1992). These
two personality traits were measured by using the shortened version of the
Revised NEO Personality Inventory (Costa and McRae, 1992).

With the exception of agreeableness, the Cronbach Alphas for the instruments
are higher than 0.60, the minimum threshold for reliability (Nunnaly, 1968). The
reliability of agreeablenss instrumet is 0.566, slighlty below the minimum
requirement. Table 1 reports the reliability of the four instruments.
Table 1: Reliability of Measures

Variables Number of Items Cronbach Alpha


Agreeableness 12 0.566
Extraversion 12 0.780
Independence 14 0.694
Suspension of Judgment 5 0.615
10
4. Analysis and Discussion
The descriptive statistics presented in table 2 shows that repondents’ answers for
each variables vary; the standard deviations for agreeableness, extraversion,
independence, and professional skepticism are 4.19, 4.91, 5.35, and 1.45
respectively. As shown in the table, the actual minimum score of each variable is
higher than the theoretical value, and the difference between the actual lowest
scores and the highest ones range from 9 to 30.
Table 2: Descriptive Statistics of Sample (N=101)

Variables Number Theoretical Actual Range Means s.d


of Items Range
Min. Max. Min. Max.
Agreeableness 12 12 60 30.00 50.00 41.1782 4.18664
Extraversion 12 12 60 28.00 56.00 43.5842 4.91379
Independence 14 14 70 35.00 65.00 48.5149 5.34904
Skepticism 5 5 25 6.00 15.00 11.9406 1.45480

The three hypotheses are tested by running a regression analysis with skepticism as
the dependent variables and agreeableness, extraversion, and independence as the
independent variables. Because the hypotheses are directional in nature, the t-tests
fo regression coefficients are one-tailed tests. Table 3 reports the results of the
regression analysis.
Table 3: Results of Regression Analysis (N=101)

Variables Beta Std. Error t-value p-value


Constant 4.709 1.736 2.713 .008
Agreeableness .009 .034 .269 .788
Extraversion .106 .029 3.695 .000
Independence .046 .026 1.762 .040
R2: 0.437; F: 7.637 (0.000). Tests are one-talled

Table 3 shows that the variances of the three independent variables explain (R 2)
43.7% of the variance of skepticism. This goodness of fit is significant at p<0.001
(F=7.637), which suggests that the regression model is good enough to test the
hypotheses.
Hypothesis 1 predicts that independence is positively associated with professional
skepticism; more independent auditors will be more professional skeptical than the
less independent ones. The regression results show that the coefficient of
independent is positive, and it is significant at p<0.05. This finding is consistent with
the prediction of hypothesis 1; auditors’ independence score positively determines
their professional skepticism. It indicates that government auditors avoid cognitive
dissonance; those who have high score of independence tend to be more skeptical,
and those who score low on independence tend to be less skeptical. The positive
sign of the coefficient implies that as auditors’ become more independent, they will

11
be more professionally skeptical. This is the first empirical evidence showing the
positive association of independence and professional skepticism.
The coefficient of the extraversion (0.106) is positive and significant at p<0.001. This
finding implies that extravesion is positively associated with skepticism. It supports
the prediction of hypothesis 1 that auditors’ extreversion scores determine their their
level of professional skepticism. Auditors who report high extraversion scores tend to
be more skepticial; the higher the extrovertion scores, the higher the professional
skepticism scores, and vice versa. This positive regression is consistent with the
prediction of the Cognitive Dissonance Theory: government auditors attempt to avoid
cognitive dissonance by adjusting their skepticism with their extraversion trait;
strongly extrovert auditors will try hard to be highly skeptical, whereas the less
extrovert auditors will be less skeptical. Thus far there is no study that examines the
impact of extraversion on professional skepticism, and hence this study is the first to
provide such empirical evidence.

The coefficient of the agreeableness, however, is not significant. This means that
agreeableness is not associated with skepticism. The finding fail to support the
prediction of hypothesis 2; auditors’ agreeableness do not determine their
professional skepticism. It should be noted that the reliability of the extraversion
instrument is below the minimum acceptable requirement; the Crobach Alpha is
0.566, smaller than 0.60 (Nunnally, 1968). The lack of reliability of the instrument
may explain the insignificant result.

5. Conclutions
This study attempts to examine empirically the impact of independence and personal
traits, agreeableness and extraversion, on professional skepticism among
government auditors (i.e., auditors of the Indonesian Supreme Audit Institution). It is
motivated by the lack of empirical evidence in this area, especially among
government auditors. The empirical findings support the prediction that
independence and extraversion affect professional skepticism positively. Bazionelos
(2004) asserts that that individuals who have high scores on extraversion must be
more likely to possess the need to occupy a central position in their work
environment so they can satisfy their ambitious and domineering tendencies. The
finding of this study is consitent with Bazionelos argument.
These findings have important implications for the Indonesian Supreme Audit
Institution, which since 2007, issued Government Audit Standards that require
government auditors to maintain their professional skepticism attitude during audit
works. The positive impact of independence on professional skepticism underscores
the importance of improving independence awareness program, one of the strategic
programs at Indonesian SAI. Indeed, since early 2007, executives of Indonesian SAI
have intensively exposed independence, together with professionalism and integrity
to auditors and staffs. In addition, the positive impact of extraversion suggests that it
may be important for ISAI to pay attention to personal trait in recruiting new auditors.
Of course, further analysis should be undertaken to look at the impact of trait on
attributes of good auditors.
12
References

Arens, A. A., J. K. Loebbecke, W. M. Lemon and I. B. Splettstoesser: 2002, Auditing


and Other Assurance Services (Prentice Hall, Toronto) Canadian Ninth
Edition.

Aronson, E. 1995. The social animal. New York: Freeman.

Aronson, E. 2004. The social animal. New York: Worth.

Bakker, B.B., K.I. Van Der Zee, K.A. Lewig, and M.F. Dollard. 2006. The
Relationship Between the Big Five Personality Factors and Burnout: A Study
Among Volunteer Councelors. The Journal of Social Psychology 146: 31-50.

Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K. & Judge, T. A. 2001. Personality and performance at


13
the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go
next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9–30.

Bazerman, M.H., G. Loewenstein, and D.A. Moore. 2002. Why Good Accountants do
Bad Audits. Harvard Business Review: 97-102.

Bazionelos, N. 2004. The Big Five of Personality and Work Involvement. Journal of
Managerial Psychology 19: 69-81

Carpenter, T. D. And Reimers, J. L. 2009. Professional Skepticism: The Effect of a


Partner’s Influence and the Presence of Auditors’ Fraud Judgments and Actions.
Working Paper.

Costa, P.T., Jr., and McRae, R.R. 1992. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-
PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual.
Odessa, FL.: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Dorn, L. And G. Matthews. 1992. Two Futher Studies of Personality Correlates of


Driver Stress. Personality and Individual Differences 13: 949-951.

Gendron, Y., R. Suddaby, and H. Lam. 2006 An Examination of the Ethical


Commitment of Professional Accountants to Auditor Independence. Journal of
Business Ethics 64: 169-193

Furnham, A., Forde, L., and Ferrari, K. 1999. Personality and Work Motivation.
Personality and Individual Differences 26: 1035-1043.

Gramling, A.A., Jenkins, J.G. and Mark H. Taylor, H.M. 2010. Policy and Research
Implications of Evolving Independence Rules for PublicCompanyAuditors.
Accounting Horizon 24: 547-566.

Judge, T.A. and Ilies, R. 2002. Relationship of personality to Performance


Motivation: A Meta Analytic Review. Journal of Applied Psychology 87: 797-807.

Kinney.,W. 1999. Auditor Independence: A Burdensome Constraint or Core Value?


Accounting Horizons, 13(1), 69-75.

McRae, R.R. & Costa, P.T. 2003. Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory
perspective (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

Murphy, K.R. 2000. What constructs underlie measures of honesty or integrity? In


R. Goffin & E. Helmes (Eds.), Problems and Solutions in Human Assessment:
A Festschrift to Douglas N. Jackson at Seventy (pp. 265–284). London:
Kluwer.

Myers, D.G. 2007. Psychology (8th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers

Nelson, M. 2009. A Model and Literature Review of Professional Skepticism in


Auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 28: 1-34.

14
Previts, G. J., and B. D. Merino. 1998. A History of Accountancy in the United States:
The Cultural Significance of Accounting. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University
Press.

Ones, D. S. & Viswevaran, C. 1998. Integrity testing in organizations. In R. W.


Griffin, A. O’Leary-Kelly & J. M. Collins (Eds.), Dysfunctional behavior in
organizations.Vol. 23B: Nonviolent Dysfunctional Behavior. Greenwich, CT:
JAI Press.

Ones, D.S., Viswevaran, C. & Schmidt, F.L. 1993. Comprehensive meta-analysis of


integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and
theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 679–703.

Wattson, D. and B. Hubbard. 1996. Adaptational Style and Dispositional Structure:


Coping in the Context of the Five Factor Model. Journal of Personality 64: 737-
774.

Wrightsman, L.: 1974, Assumptions About Human Nature: A Social-Psychological


Approach (Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Monterey, CA).

Wrightsman, L. S.: 1991, ‘Interpersonal Trust and Attitudes toward Human Nature’,
in J. P. Robinson,

Wallman, S.M.H. 1996. The Future of Accounting, Part III: Reliability and Auditor
Independence. Accounting Horizons, 10(4), 76-97.

15

Potrebbero piacerti anche