Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Introduction
educationand service.
livelihood skills.
keep the inmates busy, and to provide them money for their
Effects of livelihood
program………… 2|
of rehabilitating inmates.
productive.
Effects of livelihood
program………… 3|
share that they can get. And some are complaining that they
Foreign Literature
Local Literature
(Sagadal, 2014)
Effects of livelihood
program………… 7|
the program.
improved in such a short span of time that they are now able
percent is split between MIGCO and the BJMP (30 percent goes
Awards.
Foreign Studies
( Opagga, 2007 ).
orderly.
Local Studies
who are outside the jail. Their income also gives them
market and the lack of promoter for their products and the
2009)
livelihood programs of the San Jose City Jail were very much
financial needs.
Conceptual Framework
rehabilitating inmates.
Effects of livelihood
program………… 15 |
1. Profile of the
respondents.
2. Effects of
livelihood programs.
3. Problems encountered
in implementing
livelihood programs.
Effects of Livelihood
Programs in Life of
Inmates
Figure 1
1.1.1 Age;
1.1.2Gender;
1.1.3Civil Status;
1.1.4Educational Attainment; and
1.1.5Years in Service?
1.2 INMATE
1.2.1 Age;
1.2.2 Gender;
1.2.3 Civil Status;
1.2.4 Educational Attainment; and
1.2.5 Years in jail?
2. What are the effects of livelihood program to the life
of inmates?
3. What are the problems encountered by jail management in
able to develop skills and talents that they can apply when
Definition of Terms
of punishment.
Chapter 2
Research Design
Formula
% = f/n x 100
Where:
% = percentage
F = number of responses
interpretation.
Formula:
WM = TFW/N
WM = Weighted mean
Where:
AMW = TWM/N
AMW = Average W
Scoring:
4 3.41-4.20 Agree
2 1.81-2.60 Disagree
4 3.41-4.20 Serious
CHAPTER III
TO AGE
RAN
JAIL PERSONNEL INMATES
AGE
RAN
AGE K
Frequenc Percentag RANGE Frequenc Percentag
K
y e y e
21- 1 10 4 18-22 8 16 1.5
25
26- 1 10 4 23-27 4 8 7
30
31- 0 0 0 28-32 8 16 1.5
35
36- 4 40 1 33-37 7 14 4
40
41- 3 30 2 38-42 7 14 4
45
46- 1 10 4 43-47 7 14 4
50
51- 0 0 0 48-52 4 8 7
55
TOTA 10 100% 53-57 4 8 7
L
58abov 1 2 9
e
TOTAL 50 100 -
Effects of livelihood
program………… 27 |
enforcers.
While in the inmate respondents are ranging their ages
Table 1.2
Effects of livelihood
program………… 28 |
GENDER
RESPONDENTS
GENDER
JAIL PERSONNEL INMATES
F % R F % R
MALE 9 90 1 50 100 1
FEMALE
1 10 2 0 - 0
TOTAL
10 100% 50 100%
of 100%.
As can be gleaned from the findings, jail personnel
rehabilitating inmates.
On the part of male inmates having a percentage
CIVIL STATUS
RESPONDENTS
CIVIL STATUS JAIL PERSONNEL INMATES
F P R F P R
MARRIED 7 70 1 24 48 1
SINGLE 2 20 2 21 42 2
SEPARATED 1 10 3 5 10 3
WIDOWED - - - - - -
TOTAL 10 100% 50 100%
they have stable job and they are mature enough give a
most of the offenders are the people who most need money which
attainment.
Table 1.4
FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF THE RESPONDENTS AS
TO EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT.
EDUCATIONAL RESPONDENTS
ATTAINMENT
JAIL PERSONNEL INMATES
Doctorate degree F % R F % R
Master degree - - - - - -
Masters graduate 2 20 2 - - -
Masters unit - - - - - -
College graduate 8 80 1 2 4 4
College - - - 7 14 3
Undergraduate
High School Grad - - - 17 34 2
Elementary Grad - - - 24 48 1
TOTAL 10 100% 50 100 -
Effects of livelihood
program………… 31 |
Master’s Graduate.
and many of them feel like outcasts. This may partly explain
the victim. It may also help to explain why crime rates are
organization.
In the part of inmates’ respondents were dominated of
obtained.
Effects of livelihood
program………… 33 |
Table 1.5
FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF THE RESPONDENTS AS
1-5 3 30 1.5
6-10 - - -
11-15 1 10 4.5
16-20 3 30 1.5
21-25 2 20 2
26-30 1 10 4.5
31 above - - -
TOTAL 10 100% -
Table 1.6
FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF THE RESPONDENTS AS
JAIL
1-5 41 82 1
6-10 9 18 2
11 above - - - As
TOTAL 50 100% -
reflected table, ranked first and got the frequency of 41 or
8%, had been stayed in the jail for about 1-5 years; second,
Table 2
DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONSES AS TO LEVEL OF EFFECTS OF
RESPONDENTS
ITEMS JAIL PERSONNEL INMATES
WM VI RANK WM VI RANK
1. Livelihood Program
help the inmate to earn 4.8 SA 1 3.46 Agree 4
to support their needs.
5. Livelihood program
help the inmates to 4.7 3.22 MA 5
avoid vices inside the SA 3.5
cell.
Legend:
WM = Weighted Mean
VI = Verbal Interpretation
R = Rank
TMW = Total Weighted Mean
OVI = Overall Verbal Interpretation
avoid vices inside the cell with a weighted mean of 4.7. The
Table 3
Distribution of Responses in terms of Problems encountered
livelihood Programs
Statements WM VI R
Effects of livelihood
program………… 38 |
products.
3. Lack of supports from the
3.5 MS 1.5
management of the Prison.
4. Insufficiency of supplies of raw
3.5 MS 1.5
materials.
5. Un-equal sharing
1.5 NPA 5
Legend:
WM = Weighted Mean
VI = Verbal Interpretation
R = Rank
TMW = Total Weighted Mean
OVI = Overall Verbal Interpretation
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This chapter presents the summary of findings, and the
Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of
described in terms of
1.1.1 Age;
1.1.2Gender;
1.1.3Civil Status;
1.1.4Educational Attainment; and
1.1.5Years in Service?
1.2 INMATE
1.2.1 Age;
1.2.2 Gender;
1.2.3 Civil Status;
1.2.4 Educational Attainment; and
1.2.5 Years in jail?
2. What are the effects of livelihood program in the life
of inmate’s?
Effects of livelihood
program………… 42 |
livelihood programs?
4. What is the implication of the study to the inmates way
1.1. Age
Four or 40% were ages ranging from 36-40; three or
female.
1.3. Civil status
Seven or 70% were married; two or 20% were single;
master graduate.
For Inmates
1.1. Age
Eight or 16% were ages of 18-22 and 28-32, seven
1.2. Gender
Fifty or 100% were male inmates
college graduate.
6-10 years
life of inmate’s?
The total weighted mean of this particular
interpretation of Agree.
3. The degree of problems encountered in implementing
livelihood programs
The total weighted mean of this particular
Conclusions
their products.
and violence.
5. Recommendations
BIBLIOGRAPHY
A. PUBLISHED MATERIALS
Watson, Albert J. JR. (2009). The police and the public.New
Quiapo Manila.
Mumola, C. (2000). Incarcerated parents and their children.
to 2001
Bureau of Jail Management and Penology Manual Revised(2007)
Provincial Public Safety Command briefing handbook (2012)
Miceli, Victoria, "Analyzing the Effectiveness of
Paper 158.
B. UNPUBLISHED MATERIALS
C. ELECTRONIC SOURCE
http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/who_commits_crime
www.inquirer.net/videos/pdf/annex-on-normalization
www.slideshare.net/calabangamps3/pnp-motivesplans
pro8pnp.gov.ph/index.php/plans and programs.
http://moseswright.articlealley.com/criminal-
rehabilitation--working-towards-a-better-life--for-
inmates-and-their-families-129534.html
www.oppaga.state.fl.us
Effects of livelihood
program………… 49 |