Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
148-153 148
Lam-Estrada, P., Maldonado-Ramírez, M. R., López-Bonilla, J. & López-Vázquez, R., Transformation of Dirac Spinor under Boosts
& 3-Rotations
Article
Transformation of Dirac Spinor under Boosts & 3-Rotations
P. Lam-Estrada1, M. R. Maldonado-Ramírez1, J. López-Bonilla2* & R. López-Vázquez2
1
Departamento de Matemáticas, Escuela Superior de Física y Matemáticas, Instituto Politécnico
Nacional (IPN), Edif. 9, Col. Lindavista CP 07738, México DF
2
ESIME-Zacatenco, IPN, Edif. 5, 1er. Piso, Lindavista 07738, México DF
Abstract
We exhibit the transformation rule for the 4-spinor of Dirac under 3-rotations and boosts.
1. Introduction
In the Dirac equation for spin-1/2 particles [1-3] [(𝑥 𝜇 ) = (𝑡, 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧), ℏ = 𝑐 = 1]:
𝜕
(𝑖𝛾 𝜇 𝜕𝜇 − 𝑚0 )𝜓 = 0, 𝑖 = √−1, 𝜕𝜇 = 𝜕𝑥 𝜇 , (1)
𝐼 0 0 𝜎𝑗 0 𝐼
𝛾0 = ( ), 𝛾𝑗 = ( ) , 𝑗 = 1, 2, 3, 𝛾 5 ≡ 𝑖 𝛾 0𝛾1𝛾 2𝛾 3 = ( ), (3)
0 −𝐼 −𝜎𝑗 0 𝐼 0
0 1 0 −𝑖 1 0
𝜎1 = ( ), 𝜎2 = ( ), 𝜎3 = ( ), (4)
1 0 𝑖 0 0 −1
*
Correspondence: J. López-Bonilla, ESIME-Zacatenco-IPN, Edif. 5, Col. Lindavista CP 07738, México DF
E-mail: jlopezb@ipn.mx
0 𝐼 0 −𝜎𝑗 𝐼 0
𝛾0 = ( ), 𝛾𝑗 = ( ) , 𝑗 = 1, 2, 3, 𝛾5 = ( ), (5)
𝐼 0 𝜎𝑗 0 0 −𝐼
to study the transformation law of 𝜓 under the homogeneous Lorentz group [14-16]:
𝑥̃ 𝜇 = 𝐿𝜇 𝜈 𝑥 𝜈 , (6)
which implies the existence [4, 17] of a non-singular matrix 𝑆 such that:
𝐿𝜇𝛼 𝑆 𝛾 𝛼 = 𝛾𝜇 𝑆, (7)
and we obtain the relativistic invariance of (1) if the Dirac spinor obeys the transformation rule:
𝜓̃ = 𝑆 𝜓 . (8)
In this work we deduce the structure of 𝑆 for boosts and 3-rotations, working with the
representations (3) and (5).
2. Construction of 𝑺
First we consider infinitesimal Lorentz transformations, besides 𝐿 is an orthogonal
matrix (𝐿𝜇 𝛼 𝐿𝜈𝛼 = 𝑔𝜇𝜈 ) [14], then it differs infinitesimally from the unit matrix by a skew-
symmetric matrix [18]:
and we must determine 𝑄 with the constraint required by (7) via the commutator:
1 𝛽 1 1
[𝛾𝜇 , 𝑄] = 𝐹𝜇𝛽 𝛾 𝛽 = 𝐹𝛼𝛽 (𝛿𝜇𝛼 𝛾 𝛽 − 𝛿𝜇 𝛾 𝛼 ) = 𝐹𝛼𝛽 [𝛾𝜇 , 𝛾 𝛼 𝛾 𝛽 ] = [𝛾𝜇 , 𝐹𝛼𝛽 𝛾 𝛼 𝛾 𝛽 ],
2 4 4
1 1
that is, 𝑄 = 4 𝐹𝛼𝛽 𝛾 𝛼 𝛾 𝛽 , hence for a finite Lorentz transformation [we take 𝜀 = 𝑁 ]:
𝜀 1
𝑆 = 𝑙𝑖𝑚 𝑁→∞ (𝐼 + 4 𝐹𝜇𝜈 𝛾 𝜇 𝛾 𝜈 )𝑁 = exp (4 𝐹𝜇𝜈 𝛾 𝜇 𝛾 𝜈 ). (10)
Therefore, given 𝐿 we have 𝐹𝜇𝜈 , then (8) and (10) allow to construct the new 4-spinor.
respectively, then in the Dirac-Pauli and Weyl representations the matrix (10) takes the form:
𝑖
exp(2 𝜎⃗ ∙ 𝜃⃗) 0
𝑆=( 𝑖
). (12)
0 exp(2 𝜎⃗ ∙ 𝜃⃗)
4. Boosts
In this case, for boosts in the directions X, Y, Z, the matrix (𝐹𝜇 𝜈 ) has the structure [3, 12]:
0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
−𝑖𝐾1 𝜙1 = 𝜙1 (1 0 0 0) , −𝑖𝐾2 𝜙2 = 𝜙2 (0 0 0 0),
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1
−𝑖𝐾3 𝜙3 = 𝜙3 (0 0 0 0), (13)
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
We note that the full matrix of Lorentz transformations of rotations and boosts adopts the
expression:
where only one rotation or one boost angle can be applied at any one time [12]. In (14) we see
six parameters for the homogeneous Lorentz group.
ISSN: 2153-8301 Prespacetime Journal www.prespacetime.com
Published by QuantumDream, Inc.
Prespacetime Journal| January 2016 | Volume 7 | Issue 1 | pp. 148-153 151
Lam-Estrada, P., Maldonado-Ramírez, M. R., López-Bonilla, J. & López-Vázquez, R., Transformation of Dirac Spinor under Boosts
& 3-Rotations
𝜙 𝜙
cosh ( 2𝑘 ) 𝐼 −sinh( 2𝑘 )𝜎𝑘
𝑆=( 𝜙 𝜙
) Dirac-Pauli scheme, (15)
−sinh( 2𝑘 )𝜎𝑘 cosh ( 2𝑘 ) 𝐼
1
exp(− 2 𝜎⃗ ∙ 𝜙⃗⃗) 0
=( 1 ) Weyl scheme, (16)
0 exp(2 𝜎⃗ ∙ 𝜙⃗⃗)
hence, in the representation (5), for rotations and boosts the matrix 𝑆 acquires the general
structure [3, 12]:
1
exp[2 𝜎⃗ ∙ (𝑖𝜃⃗ − 𝜙⃗⃗)] 0
𝑆=( 1 ). (17)
0 exp([2 𝜎⃗ ∙ (𝑖𝜃⃗ + 𝜙⃗⃗)]
5. Weyl spinors
where 𝜓𝑅 and 𝜓𝐿 are called Weyl spinors [12, 20], then with (8) and (17) it is immediate to
deduce their transformation laws (in the chiral scheme) under an arbitrary Lorentz mapping (14)
[3]:
1 1
𝜓̃𝑅 = exp [2 𝜎⃗ ∙ (𝑖𝜃⃗ − 𝜙⃗⃗)] 𝜓𝑅 , 𝜓̃𝐿 = exp [2 𝜎⃗ ∙ (𝑖𝜃⃗ + 𝜙⃗⃗)] 𝜓𝐿 , (19)
and they do not preserve parity (they are not invariant with respect to the change 𝑥 → −𝑥), hence
they were assumed to represent neutrinos, which are all left-handed (described by 𝜓𝐿 ) while
antineutrinos are all right-handed (described by 𝜓𝑅 ). The Dirac spinor, being composed of both
spinors, is fully parity-preserving [12]. The standard representation necessarily mixes the Weyl
spinors under Lorentz transformations, so their distinction is not noticeable; 𝜓𝑅 and 𝜓𝐿 are
1
dotted and undotted 2-spinors, respectively, that is, they correspond to the representations (2 , 0)
1
and (0, 2) of the Lorentz group [3]. In fact [21]:
𝜉1̇ 𝜂1
𝜓𝑅 = ( 2̇ ) , 𝜓𝐿 = (𝜂 ), (20)
𝜉 2
𝜃 𝜃
𝜂̃1 𝜂1 cos( 21 )
−𝑖 𝑠𝑖𝑛( 21 )
( 2 ) = 𝑈1 ( 2 ), 𝑈1 = ( 𝜃 𝜃
), det 𝑈1 = 1 , (21)
𝜂̃ 𝜂 −𝑖 𝑠𝑖𝑛( 21 ) cos( 21 )
†
(𝜉̃1̇ 𝜉̃2̇ ) = (𝜉1̇ 𝜉 2̇ )𝑈1 . (22)
𝜙 𝜙
𝑇 𝑇 𝜂̃1 𝜂1 cosh( 21 ) −sinh( 21)
†
𝜓̃𝑅 = 𝜓𝑅 𝑈2 , ( 2 ) = 𝑈2 ( 2 ) , 𝑈2 = ( 𝜙 𝜙
), det 𝑈2 = 1, (23)
𝜂̃ 𝜂 −sinh( 21 ) cosh( 21 )
thus (21), (22) and (23) show [22] the undotted and dotted character of 𝜓𝐿 and 𝜓𝑅 , respectively.
1
The matrix exp(2 𝜎⃗ ∙ 𝜙⃗⃗) is not unitary, hence we have above a finite-dimensional and non-
unitary representation of the non-compact Lorentz group, however, it has infinite-dimensional
unitary representations [3]. If we employ (5) and (18) in the Dirac equation (1) for massless
particles, we obtain the Weyl equations [3, 11, 12] (𝜕0 − 𝜎𝑗 𝜕𝑗 )𝜓𝐿 = 0 and (𝜕0 + 𝜎𝑗 𝜕𝑗 )𝜓𝑅 = 0,
that is:
thus 𝜓𝐿 (𝜓𝑅 ) are eigenstates of negative (positive) helicity, which tells us how closely aligned
the spin of a particle is with its direction of motion.
References