Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
6.1 INTRODUCTION
6.3 APPARATUS
6.5 PROCEDURES
6.7 APPLICATIONS
6.8 CONCLUSIONS
6.9 REFERENCES
6.1 INTRODUCTION
Arsenic has been found in nature since antiquity. Aristotle made reference to
sandarach (arsenic trisulfide) in the 4th century B.C. In the 1st century A.D., Pliny
stated that sandarach is found in gold and silver mines and arsenic (arsenic trioxide) is
composed of the same matter as sandarach. By the 11th century three species of
arsenic were known, white, yellow and red - since then recognized as arsenic trioxide,
arsenic trisulfide (orpiment) and arsenic disulfide (realgar) respectively [1].
The name arsenic comes from the Greek word arsenikon, which means
orpiment. Orpiment is a bright yellow mineral composed of arsenic sulfide (AS2S3),
and is the most highly visible common arsenic mineral. Historians say that arsenic
was discovered in 1250 A. D. by Albertus Magnus, a German monk who spent his life
studying and classifying natural materials. It is believed that he heated soap and
orpiment together and isolated elemental arsenic. Arsenopyrite (FeAsS) is the most
common mineral from which, the arsenic sublimes leaving ferrous sulfide on heating.
148
arsenopyrite (FeAsS), loellingite (FeAs2), enargite (C11S.AS2S5), orpiments (AS2S3)
and realgar (AS2S3).
The maximum permissible limit for arsenic in water is 0.05 mgL‘ as recommended
by WHO [2]. The threshold limit proposed by ACGIH for arsenic in air is
0.5 mgm*3 [3].
The most infamous use of arsenic is as a poison. However, arsenic can now
be detected during autopsy, so this use of the element has become a legend of the
past. These days the most important use of arsenic is in the preservation of wood. It
is used in the form of a compound called chromated copper arsenate (CCA) and is
added to wood used to build houses and other wooden structures. CCA prevents
organisms from growing in the wood and causing it to rot. Arsenic is also used as a
weed killer and rat poison. Arsenic has been used to improve the roundness of lead
shot. Trace amounts of arsenic are alloyed with lead in storage batteries. Arsenic is
also used in the manufacture of high efficiency solar cells. Alloys of gallium, arsenic
and phosphorous are used in the semiconductor industry for the production of light-
emitting diodes (LEDs) in watches, clocks, calculators and numerous other instrument
displays.
149
would bear his name. Fowler's solution was used empirically to treat a variety of
diseases during the 18th, 19th and early 20th centuries [6]. Pharmacology texts of the
1880’s describe the use of arsenical pastes for cancers of the skin and breast and
arsenous acid was used to treat hypertension, bleeding gastric ulcers, heartburn and
chronic rheumatism [5]. Arsenic's reputation as a therapeutic agent was enhanced in
1910 when Nobel laureate Paul Ehrlich developed salvarsan, an organic arsenial for
treating syphilis and trypanosomiasis. However, as medicine evolved in the
20th century, enthusiasm for medicinal arsenic waned rapidly [5].
The concentration of arsenic in plants can vary depending on factors like the
species of plant, the type of arsenic in the soil, and the location of a given species.
Arsenic can exist in a variety of oxidation states in inorganic and organic forms in
many environmental matrices such as natural water and soils [7]. Therefore precise
knowledge of the arsenic compounds present in a system is required for an accurate
assessment of the environmental and biological impact of arsenic, which has resulted
in an increasing need of analytical method for their determination at micro trace or
even ultra trace levels.
Various methods for the analysis of arsenic have been reported in the
literature. Many analytical techniques based on flow injection analysis with hydride
generation [8], atomic absorption spectroscopy [9], gas fluorometry-atomic absorption
spectroscopy [10], induced coupled plasma-atomic absorption spectroscopy [11],
neutron activation analysis [12] and fluorescence spectroscopy [13] are used for the
arsenic determination.
A literature survey revealed that a large number of reagents are suitable for the
spectrophotometric determination of arsenic. Cristau reported a spectrophotometric
determination of arsenic using hypophosphorus acid [14]. The method was influenced
of the polyvinylpyrrolidone and stannous chloride. Powers et al. reported silver
diethylthiocarbamate as a spectrophotometric reagent for the determination of arsenic
[15]. This method was based on the reduction of arsenic by zinc and generated arsine
was absorbed in silver diethylthiocarbamate. Molybdenum blue was also used as a
150
spectrophotometric reagent for the determination of arsenic in tungstun-free
steels [16].
Silvia and Victoria described the main sources of arsenic emission in Romania
are ore smelters and refineries [25]. Arsenic determinations were carried out by the
silver diethyldithiocarbamate spectrophotometric method on hair and urine samples
taken from smelter workers and individuals residing in two polluted areas and three
151
areas not polluted by arsenic. Arsenic in hair was found to be a more reliable
biological test than tests on urine, obviously reflecting the differences in arsenic
concentrations in workroom air. Arsenic analysis of hair on people living in two
locations near an ore smelter and a refinery indicated high levels compared to those of
individuals residing in nonpolluted areas. Epidemiological studies were necessary in
order to ascertain effects of heavy arsenic exposure in relation with concurrent
exposures to respiratory irritants and metals.
Agrawal and Patke reported a simple, sensitive and selective method for the
determination of microamounts of arsenic(III) in the environment [29]. Arsenic
formed a yellow colored complex with N-phenylbenzo-hydroxamic acid (PBHA) at
pH 4.5-5.2 which was extracted into chloroform. The effective molar absorptivity of
152
As-PBHA extract was 1.1 * 104 LmoF’cm'1 at 410 nm. Many common ions associated
with arsenic did not interfere. The effect of pH, reagent concentration and solvent was
described. The arsenic in trace quantities were estimated in the industrial effluents,
soil and grass samples.
153
and malachite green [34]. The ion-association complex was soluble in the presence of
triton X-305 and arsenic was determined directly in aqueous solution. The molar
absorptivity was found to be 1.13xl05 Lmor'cm”1 at 640 nm. Beer's law was obeyed
for 0-5 pg of arsenic. The lower limit of determination (absorbance = 0.01) was 4
ngmL'1 in the final solution.
Tianze and Ming described a simple and sensitive procedure for the
spectrophotometric determination of traces of arsenic [35]. In this method arsine
generated at pH 5.3 reacted with silver acetate in the aqueous solution in the presence
of tween-80, which formed a yellow silver sol with an absorption maximum at 420
nm. The molar absorptivity was found to be 4.8x104 Lmof’cm"1. Beer's law was
obeyed in the range 0.3-5.0 pg of arsenic in 20 mL solution. This method was used in
the determination of arsenic in water and waste water samples.
154
blue. The blue colored dye exhibited an absorption maximum at 780 nm in n-butanol.
Beer's law was obeyed in the range of 0.02-0.14 ppm of arsenic.
155
rhodamine B, by the action of iodine which was released by the reaction between
potassium iodate and arsenic in slightly acidic medium. The color of the dye was
measured at 553 nm. Beer’s law was obeyed in the concentration range of
0.04-0.4 mgL"1 of arsenic. The molar absorptivity was found to be
3.24*105 LmoF'cm-1. The proposed method was successfully applied for the
determination of arsenic in environmental and biological samples. Gudzenko et al.
described a spectrophotometric determination of trace amounts of arsenic using
michler's thioketone as a reagent [45]. The molar absorptivity value was
1.02*105 Lmof'cm'1 at 640 nm. Beer's law was obeyed in the concentration range
0.008-0.12 mgL"1 of arsenic.
Abd El-Hafeez and El-Syed described a simple, rapid and selective procedure
for the indirect spectrophotometric determination of arsenic(V) [46]. The method was
based on the reduction of As(V) to As(III) with hydroiodic acid (KI + HC1). The
liberated iodine, equivalent to each analyte which was quantitatively extracted with
oleic acid surfactant. The iodine-HOL system exhibited maximum absorbance at
435 nm. The calibration graphs were found to be linear over the range 0.25-20 pgmL'1
of As(V) with lower detection limits 0.15 pgmL"1. The molar absorptivity and
Sandell’s sensitivity were found to be 0.5X104 Lmof’cm-1 and 0.0149 pgem'2
respectively. The relative standard deviation for five replicate analyses of 4 pgmL'1 of
arsenic was 0.9%. The proposed procedure in the presence of EDTA as a masking
agent for foreign ions was successfully applied to the determination of arsenic in
copper metal, in addition to their determination in spiked and polluted water samples.
156
applied for real sample analysis. Sano et al. reported ammonium
pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate as spectrophotometric reagent for the determination of
arsenic [48].
Taniai et al. described an automated on-line solvent extraction system for the
determination of arsenic or tin in steel by electrothermal atomic absorption
spectrometry (ET-AAS) [49]. The method was based on the formation of ASI3 and
SnLj in concentrated hydrochloric acid and sulfuric acid media respectively. They are
extracted into benzene and back extracted into water and 0.25 M sulfuric acid,
respectively. An improved gravity phase separator was developed for the recycling of
organic solvent used in the automated on-line solvent extraction system. Using the
proposed system, arsenic or tin contained in the acid dissolved steel sample solution
was automatically extracted and back-extracted. Then, the back-extracted solutions
were used for the determination of arsenic or tin by ET-AAS. In the determination of
arsenic, 800 mgL'1 of cobalt solution had to be used as the matrix modifier to exclude
the effect of coexisting substances such as iodide ion. In the determination of tin,
1000 mgL'1 of palladium solution had to be used in the same manner. By this method,
detection limits of As and Sn were 0.2 jig of As in the 0.1 g of Fe and 0.1 jig of Sn in
the 0.05 gofFe.
157
ion associate of arsenomolybdate and methyltrioctylammonium ions. The contents of
column was dissolved in a small volume of N,N-dimethylformamide having stannous
chloride as a solvent. The absorbance was measured at 715 nm at room temperature.
The method allowed determination of arsenic in the range of 1-8 ngmL'1 in the initial
solution with r=0.999 (n=6). The relative standard deviation for 15 replicate
measurements of 6.0 ngmL'1 of arsenic was 1.3 % and the detection limit was 0.067
ngmL'1. The preconcentration factors of 100 and 167 could be achieved when using a
5 and 3 mL DMF for dissolving adsorbent respectively. The optimized method was
successfully applied to determination of arsenic in natural water, synthetic sample and
fish.
158
standard deviation for 20 ppb of arsenic was 1.3% (n=8). The iron as a matrix did not
interfere with the determination of arsenic up to a million-fold to arsenic amount.
159
The aim of the present work described in this chapter is to provide a simple
and sensitive method for the determination of arsenic using toluidine blue and
safranine O as new reagents. The proposed method has been successfully applied for
the determination of arsenic in various environmental and biological samples.
160
6.3 APPARATUS
All chemicals were of analytical reagent grade or chemically pure grade and
distilled water was used throughout the study. Arsenic(III) stock solution
(1000 pgmL'1) was prepared by dissolving 0.1734 g of NaAs02 in 100 mL of water.
Working standard was prepared by appropriate dilution of stock. Toluidine blue
(0.01 %), saffanine O (0.02 %), hydrochloric acid (1 M), potassium iodate (2 %) and
sodium acetate (1 M) were used.
6.5 PROCEDURES
161
then hydrochloric acid (1 M, 1 mL) were added and mixture was gently shaken until
the appearance of yellow color indicating the liberation of iodine. This was followed
by addition of safranine O (0.02 %, 0.5 mL) and 2 mL of sodium acetate solution.
The solution was kept for 2 minutes and made up to the mark with distilled water. The
absorbance was measured at 532 ran against the corresponding reagent blank. Reagent
blank was prepared by replacing the analyte (arsenic) solution with distilled water.
The absorbance corresponding to the bleached color, which in turn corresponds to the
analyte (arsenic) concentration, was obtained by subtracting the absorbance of the
blank solution from that of the test solution. The amount of the arsenic present in the
volume taken was computed from the calibration graph (Figure VIA3).
162
6.6 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
163
could be achieved by the addition of 2 mL of 1 M sodium acetate solution in a total
volume of 10 mL. Effect of pH on color stability is presented in Figure VIA4.
164
interfering species were established at those concentrations that do not cause more
than ±2.0% error in absorbance values for arsenic(III) at 2 pgmL'1, The tolerance
limits of foreign ions are listed in Table 6A1. The results indicated that most of the
common ions did not interfere. Urea, uric acid, glucose, citrate, tartarate and anions
like sulphate and phosphate did not interfere.
6.7 APPLICATIONS
6.8 CONCLUSIONS
1. The new reagents provide a simple, rapid, sensitive and highly specific method for
the spectrophotometric determination of arsenic.
2. The reagents have the advantage of high sensitivity and selectivity.
3. Proposed method has less interference from the common metal ions and anions.
4. The developed method does not involve any stringent reaction conditions and
offers the advantages of high stability of the reaction system (more than 8 hours).
5. The proposed method has been successfully applied for the determination of
arsenic in various environmental and biological samples. A comparison of the
method reported is made with earlier methods and is given in Table 6A3.
165
FIGURE VIA1
ABSORPTION SPECTRA OF COLORED SPECIES OF TOLUIDINE BLUE (a)
AND SAFRANINE O (b)
Absorbance
o
CO
o
CD
0.4 -
0.2 -
0.0 —I—
Wavelength (nm)
FIGURE VIA2
ADHERANCE TO BEER’S LAW FOR THE DETERMINATION OF ARSENIC
USING TOLUIDINE BLUE AS A REAGENT
00
o
Absorbance
o>
o
1
o
0.0 --
10 12 14
1
Concentration of arsenic (pgmL )
- \
166
FIGURE VIA3
ADHERANCE TO BEER’S LAW FOR THE DETERMINATION OF ARSENIC
USING SAFRANINE O AS A REAGENT
— —
CM
5
Absorbance
CO
FIGURE VIA4
EFFECT OF pH ON COLOR INTENSITY
1.4
1.2
1.0 -
Absorbance
oo
O
— 1------------------ !—
©
co
d
o
CM
d
o
h
*
Q,
167
SCHEME VI
N^r/<^CH3 '2■ H+
(CH3)2N" (ch3)2n
h3c 3
<2 • H
ri r^i
168
TABLE 6A1
EFFECT OF DIVERSE IONS ON THE DETERMINATION OF ARSENIC
(2 ngmL'1)
Foreign ions Tolerance limit (figmL'1) Foreign ions Tolerance limit (jj-gmL'1)
Toluidine blue Safranine 0 Toluidine blue Safranine O
Fe3+ 150 100 V5" 125 100
Ni2+ 75 100 Zn2+ 1000 1000
Cd2+ 500 600 P043' 1000 1000
Ba2+ 1000 750 Tartarate 1250 1000
Bi3+ 1000 1250 Oxalate 1000 1250
Al3+ 500 400 Sulfate 750 1000
Ca2+ 400 300 Nitrate 750 1000
Co2+ 175 150 Glucose 1000 1200
169
TABLE 6A2
DETERMINATION OF ARSENIC IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES USING
TOLUIDINE BLUE AND SAFRANINE O AS REAGENTS
170
TABLE 6A3
COMPARISON OF THE METHOD REPORTED WITH EARLIER METHODS
171
6.9 REFERENCES
172
25. G. Silvia and C. Victoria, Environ. Health Pers., 19 (1977) 107.
26. M. Takatomi, Y. Yoshikazu and U. Shunzo, Bunseki Kagaku, 27 (1978) 419.
27. S. H. Gowda and K. N. Thimmaiah, Microchem. J., 23 (1978) 291.
28. F. Hiroshi and I. Kamihiko, Bunseki Kagaku, 28 (1979) 627.
29. Y. K. Agrawal and S. K. Patke, Intern. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 8 (1980) 157.
30. R. H. Merry and B. A. Zarcinas, Analyst, 105 (1980) 558.
31. G. Howard and M. H. Arbab-Zavar, Analyst, 105 (1980) 338.
32. W. Elzbieta and E.Wieckowska, Biul. Wojsk. Akad. Tech., 30 (1981) 103.
33. C. Ali Naki, A. Huseyin and B. Fikret, Chim. Acta Turc., 9 (1981) 109.
34. W. Qian-Feng and L. Peng-Fei, Talanta, 30 (1983) 275.
35. Z. Tianze and W. Ming, Intern. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 15 (1983) 1.
36. W. A. Maher, Analyst, 108 (1983) 939.
37. E. Kavlentis, Anal. Lett., 20 (1987) 2043.
38. C. Lata, J. Raju and V. K. Gupta, J. Indian Chem. Soc., 67 (1990) 500.
39. K. Palanivelu, N. Balasubramanian and T.V. Ramakrishna, Talanta, 39 (1991)
555.
40. W. Jiayu, S. Jiayun, C. Haofei and J. Qimin, Huaxue Fence, 29 (1993) 351.
41. H. Dianwen and L. Jianping, Guangdong Gongxueyuan Xuebao, 13 (1996) 84.
42. W. Yubiao, YingyangXuebao, 19 (1997) 453.
43. L. Shao-Min, X. Yue-Qin and W. Yu-Biao, Chinese Chem. Lett., 10 (1999) 155.
44. A. Pillai, G. Sunita and V. K. Gupta, Anal. Chim. Acta, 408 (2000) 111.
45. L. V. Gudzenko, R. P. Pantaler and A. B. Blank, J. Anal. Chem., 56 (2001) 721.
46. G. M. Abd El-Hafeez and S. G. El-Syed, Anal. Set, 17 (2001) 1189.
47. S. Kundu, S. K. Ghosh, M. Mandal, T. Pal and A. Pal, Talanta, 58 (2002) 935.
48. Y. Sano, T. Kato, I. Nukatsuka and K. Ohzeki, Bunseki Kagaku, 52 (2003) 1153.
49. T. Taniai, A. Sakuragawa and A. Uzawa, ISIJInt., 44 (2004) 1852.
50. T. Cherian and B. Narayana, Anal. Lett., 38 (2005) 2207.
51. M. Behpour, S. M, Ghoreishi and S. Salehi, Acta Chim. Slov., 52 (2005) 323.
52. B. Narayana, T. Cherian, M. Mathew and C. Pasha, Indian J. Chem. Tech., 13
(2006) 36.
53. F. C. Graham, J. Sci. Food Agric., 24 (2006) 1115.
54. W. Kunihiro, O. Takashi, I. Junichi and I. Masayuki, Bunseki Kagaku, 55
(2006)251.
55. M. Keisuke and K. Emiko, Anal. Sci., 22 (2006) 1085.
173
56. H. D. Revanasiddappa, B. P. Dayananda and T. Kumar, Environ. Chem. Lett.,
5(2007) 151.
57. M. Hashemi and P. Modasser, Talanta, 73 (2007) 166.
174