Sei sulla pagina 1di 1

READERS’ COMMENTS

Role of Heart Failure and the assessment of HF during multivar- pressure and preserved ejection fraction. Mayo
Clin Proc 2015;90:1499e1505.
Infectious Etiology in iate analysis because of inappropriate 3. Shuai XX, Chen YY, Lu YX, Su GH, Wang
Infective Endocarditis With risk stratification. Furthermore, in their YH, Zhao HL, Han J. Diagnosis of heart failure
New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation multivariate analysis, the investigators with preserved ejection fraction: which pa-
We read the recent study by Ferrera highlighted HF as an independent pre- rameters and diagnostic strategies are more
dictor of mortality and that has been valuable? Eur J Heart Fail 2011;13:737e745.
et al1 highlighting the role of atrial 4. Zakeri R, Chamberlain AM, Roger VL, Red-
fibrillation (AF) in patients with infec- shown to be true across multiple studies field MM. Temporal relationship and prog-
tive endocarditis. We would like to offer in patients with infective endocarditis nostic significance of atrial fibrillation in heart
our thoughts on the correlation of heart resulting in a class IB indication for failure patients with preserved ejection frac-
failure (HF) with AF and the microbi- surgery.6 However, their conclusion (as tion: a community-based study. Circulation
highlighted in the discussion and 2013;128:1085e1093.
ology in these patients. As correctly 5. Mant J, Doust J, Roalfe A, Barton P, Cowie
pointed out by the investigators it is Figure 1) that AF leads to HF in a MR, Glasziou P, Mant D, McManus RJ,
indeed difficult to establish a temporal unidirectional fashion, and not using a Holder R, Deeks J, Fletcher K, Qume M,
relation between HF and AF in these bidirectional relation, is not robustly Sohanpal S, Sanders S, Hobbs FD. Systematic
supported by their data because of the review and individual patient data meta-
patients. However, on closer evaluation analysis of diagnosis of heart failure, with
of their cohort, we note the following reasons mentioned previously. modelling of implications of different diag-
points: (1) in patients with new-onset The previously mentioned observa- nostic strategies in primary care. Health Tech-
AF, the left atrial (LA) diameter was tions lead us to speculate that HF may nol Assess 2009;13:1e207.
have been underdiagnosed in their 6. Baddour LM, Wilson WR, Bayer AS,
significantly larger than in patients Fowler VG Jr, Tleyjeh IM, Rybak MJ,
maintaining sinus rhythm and (2) 53% cohort and could have been a driver for
Barsic B, Lockhart PB, Gewitz MH,
of their patients presented with “heart AF in addition to the opposite relation. Levison ME, Bolger AF, Steckelberg JM,
failure” per the investigators, which as As such, Ferrera et al’s hypothesis of Baltimore RS, Fink AM, O’Gara P, Taubert
we understand, is an episode of acute AF being a marker rather than a medi- KA; American Heart Association Committee
ator for mortality might be extendable on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and
decompensation. LA dimension Kawasaki Disease of the Council on Car-
(defined by LA volume index) in pa- to HF too and merits further investiga- diovascular Disease in the Young, Council
tients with normal filling pressures and tion evaluating causation rather than on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardio-
normal left ventricular (LV) ejection association. vascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and
From a microbiological standpoint, Stroke Council. Infective endocarditis in
fraction (EF) is an independent mortal- adults: diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and
ity predictor.2 LAVI has been noted to we note that nonecommunity-acquired
management of complications: a scientific
be an accurate marker of chronic HF (i.e., health careeacquired) infective statement for healthcare professionals from
with preserved EF and along with filling endocarditis was higher in the new- the American Heart Association. Circulation
pressures and tissue Doppler imaging, a onset AF cohort, which is an indepen- 2015;132:1435e1486.

marker of acute HF.3 Taken in combi- dent marker of worse prognosis.7 This 7. Lomas JM, Martínez-Marcos FJ, Plata A, Iva-
nova R, Gálvez J, Ruiz J, Reguera JM, Nour-
nation, it may be speculated that these information, in combination with the eddine M, de la Torre J, de Alarcón A; Grupo
patients had chronic HF with acute lack of data on how many eligible pa- Andaluz para el Estudio de las Infecciones
decompensation during their index tients did not receive cardiac surgery Cardiovasculares (Andalusian Group for the
due to increased risk of surgery, severity Study of Cardiovascular Infections) at the
admission. Furthermore, the distinction Sociedad Andaluza de Enfermedades Infec-
between HF with reduced or preserved of illness, or patient/provider prefer- ciosas (SAEI). Healthcare-associated infective
EF in this cohort is crucial because the ence, can potentially confound the endocarditis: an undesirable effect of health-
consequences of AF would be more assessment of mortality in this cohort care universalization. Clin Microbiol Infect
pronounced in the HF with preserved and need further elaborating before 2010;16:1683e1690.

EF cohort because of loss of late dia- attributing these differences to AF. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.12.019
stolic filling.4
Although the investigators have used Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula, MBBS Hospital Volume and
radiographic criteria for diagnosis of Daniel C. DeSimone, MD In-Hospital Outcomes After
HF, a meta-analysis demonstrated chest Nandan S. Anavekar, MBBCh Transcatheter Aortic Valve
radiography to be only 76% specific and Rochester, Minnesota Implantation
67% sensitive in contrast to more robust 10 December 2015
diagnostic techniques.5 In addition, the 1. Ferrera C, Vilacosta I, Fernandez C, Lopez J, We read with great interest, Kim
present study does not elaborate on Sarria C, Olmos C, Vivas D, Saez C, Sanches- et al’s1 study regarding the association
Enrique C, Ortiz-Bautista C, San Roman JA.
New York Heart Association classes, Usefulness of new-onset atrial fibrillation, as a of hospital volume with in-hospital
cardiac biomarker levels, LV function, strong predictor of heart failure and death in outcomes after transcatheter aortic
including LVEF, filling pressures, and patients with native left-sided infective endo- valve implantation (TAVI) in the
tissue Doppler imaging velocities. This carditis. Am J Cardiol 2016;117:427e433. United States. We would like to bring to
2. Patel DA, Lavie CJ, Gilliland YE, Shaw SB,
lack of distinction between acute versus Dinshaw HK, Milani RV. Prediction of all- the investigators’ attention the results
chronic and compensated versus cause mortality by the left atrial volume index from our study using the Nationwide
decompensated HF could have altered in patients with normal left ventricular filling Inpatient Sample from 2012 published

Am J Cardiol 2016;117:1028e1030 www.ajconline.org


0002-9149/16/$ - see front matter Ó 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Potrebbero piacerti anche