Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Abstract- In this paper we have done the Finite rescue jobs, lifting boats in and out of the water, etc. The
Element Analysis and weight reduction of Extensible relative compactness of telescopic booms make them
telescopic boom of Telescopic hydraulic crane using adaptable for many mobile applications. Boom play
Finite Element Analysis Software Ansys. Previous objective role in the load lifting operation and the
work has been done on this type of crane or crane maximum direct effect of the stress is initializing from it
structure is up to stress analysis using more than one and effects to another attached assemblies of crane Some
element in the Finite Element Analysis. Here we find times this crane are truck mounted to travel on highway
out the maximum stress induced in the boom model and eliminating the need of the special transportation for
with the max load carrying capacity according to the crane.
loading chart prepared using SAEJ1078 standards Generally, these cranes are able to travel on highways,
and kinematic force calculation software Design eliminating the need for special equipment to transport the
View. This stress result is less than Yield and ultimate crane. When working on the jobsite, outriggers are
strength of the material so we have option to optimize extended horizontally from the chassis then vertically to
the total weight of the boom. After reducing weight level and stabilize the crane while stationary and hoisting
of the boom we have done the stress analysis again Many truck cranes have slow-travelling capability (a few
under same condition of loading as before reduce miles per hour) while suspending a load. Great care must
weight and we got the maximum stress result is still be taken not to swing the load sideways from the direction
less than the yield and ultimate strength of the of travel, as most anti-tipping stability then lies in the
material . As a result of this study further weight stiffness of the chassis suspension. Most cranes of this type
reduction of the off highway vehicles and their also have moving counterweights for stabilization beyond
structures is proposed so we can minimize the overall that provided by the outriggers. Loads suspended directly
manufacturing cost by saving the expenditure on the aft are the most stable, since most of the weight of the
material. Model taken in this paper is Autogru 160.30 crane acts as a counterweight. Factory-calculated charts (or
of an Italian Company Eurogru Amici. The analysis electronic safeguards) are used by crane operators to
has been done at the company Tecso Technology determine the maximum safe loads for stationary
Solution, Baroda. (outriggers ) work as well as (on-rubber) loads and
travelling speeds. This paper is a part of analysis and
KEYWORDS: - Telescopic Hydraulic Crane, boom, optimization using the stress result getting from structural
FEA, Optimization, Design View. analysis of telescopic hydraulic crane using ANSYS
11.0(FEA Software).
1. INTRODUCTION
In this paper we have studied one step further than
A telescopic hydraulic crane has a boom that previous authors work did up to analysis and modeling.
consists of a number of tubes fitted one inside the This paper represent the overall manufacturing cost
other. A hydraulic or other powered mechanism reduction by use of weight optimized model keeping the
extends or retracts the tubes to increase or decrease same limit for the stress produced at the time of loading. In
the total length of the boom. These types of booms this paper also incorporate one kinematic force calculation
are often used for short term construction projects, software DESIGN VIEW which is very useful for the force
calculation for off highway vehicles.
2. EXTENSIBLE BOOM MODEL 3. FORCE CALCULATION USING DESIGN VIEW
DESCRIPTION
Nomenclature
Boom play a vital role for load lifted in crane the Cl_l = Length of cylinder
term telescopic hydraulic crane implies that the boom = 3720 < Cl_l < 6420
has the section more than one in telescopic manner.
Mcl = Mass of Cylinder = 1020 Kg
Here the telescopic boom has a five section of boom
and section 4 attached with Boom head sheave. With P_Cl = Pressure of Cylinder < Ps
advantages of lifting load at high elevation or at long Ps = Static Cylinder = 32.61 Mpa
horizontal reach , boom with automatic mechanism Cy_D = Cylinder Diameter = 310mm
of extend and retract of its section makes it compact Mlf = Mass of Lower Frame = 11996 Kg
and reliable for using at any desired mark. Here every
Muf = Mass of Upper frame = 1795 Kg
section has a half round shape from its middle to
bottom and square from middle to up. This type of
Mbo = Mass of boom = 7000 Kg
section gives the higher strength than the only square Cab = Mass of Cabin = 315 Kg
sections boom. Model taken for the FEA is attached Wi = Mass of Winch = 505 Kg
with the cylinder for giving constraints. On the crane Ax1 = Mass of first Axle = 4100 Kg
boom attached with its pivot point to the upper
Ax2 = Mass of second Axle = 3050 Kg
structure and it reach capacity controlled by
extracting and retracting hydraulic cylinder as shown
Ax3 = Mass of third Axle = 1595 Kg
in figure1. Ax4 = Mass of fourth Axle =1595 Kg
CgClx= Horizontal Dimensions from pivot
Point to CG of Cylinder
Boom 4
Cgxbo = Horizontal dimensions from
Boom 3
Pivot point to CG of Boom
MaxR=Horizontal dimensions between
Boom 5 with Boom
Head Sheaves
Boom2 Load lifted point and front tip.
Boom 1 FliftF=Maximum Force lifted by the
(Base boom)
boom at the desired position
Cylinder
Figure2:- DV file of 26.8m height and 8 m reach
5 FEA SOLUTION AND RESULT Figure 4:-Vertical Load of 42209 N acting at sheaves
Here we took the max load applied at the height of
After meshing completion next step towards
26.8m because if analysis safe for this load condition then
optimization is static structural analysis and for that
automatically become safe for further loading condition so
we have to give the load as per shown in the figure 4
for that we have to take load at 8 m reach and it is 42209N.
at the sheaves. This load acting vertical at the bottom
Run analysis in Ansys workbench after completion of all
of the sheave at the boom angle of 70 degree with
horizontal line passing through the pivot point of the
preprocesses like cylindrical support at the boom end
and cylinder end .
The results come out after long mathematical 6 WEIGHT OPTIMIZATION
procedure computed by the Ansys is Equivalent Design optimization is a procedure to create an
Stress and Total Deformation of the boom. Now the optimum design performs intended functions and meets all
stress result is under the safe design stress criteria requirements likes stress level and keeps the total weight to
according to calculation as per below minimum. In this model we optimized weight by the shape
optimization in the Ansys workbench up to 20% its called
Safe Working Stress = Yield point stress shape factor in Ansys environment. We gave the same
Factor of safety loading condition and shape factor we run the analysis and
= 900/2 getting result. This results are in the form of original mass
= 450 Mpa>363.85Mpa Optimized mass and marginal mass and also have
According to this result as per shown in the figure5 is simulation of the boom for where we need to optimize the
363.85Mpa which is less than 450 MPa means the mass so our basic function requirements are fulfilled
boom has safe for working to the applied load of means working stress in less than the safe working stress.
42209N and less than that. In figure 7 we have done the shape optimization and got
the result for weight reduction.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
It is pleasure to acknowledge much stimulating
correspondence with Prof & Head P.D. Solanki of
L.D.College of Engineering and Mr. Atul Deshmukh,
Principal Engineer of Tecso Technology solution. It is
greatfully to acknowledge the support of Tecso
Technology Solution which provided the Model Data
of Telescopic Hydraulic Crane model Autogru
160.30.
REFERENCES