Implemintation of School Management Team Among Jewish and Arab School Principals by
Hakeem Haj-yahia
Thesis submitted for the M.A. degree at Tel Aviv
University. This work was carried out under the supervision of Prof. Abraham Yogev.
March, 1999 2
Abstract
In Israel as in many other countries all over the world,
there is a growing consensus that schools, as social organizations, should affect educational quality through work groups and school management team.
Many researchers emphasize the importance of the
principal who is responsible for both the organizational and pedagogical aspects of the school. The principal’s conception of his or her role emphasizes the importance of educational leadership beyond the administrative authority.
Determinants this research, based on a causal model,
tries to find differences among three groups of principals : Arab male principals, Jewish male principals and Jewish female principals. It tries to detect the determinants of perceptions of school team importance, and of the actual existence of School team size and School team meetings frequency.
The study deals with these issues in all three
populations of school principals. It is based on data collected by questionnaires filled in during the last part of the 1995 academic year by 568 school principals. 3
Four sets of composite variables were measured. The
first set measured the perception of school team importance; the second measured the school team size; the third variable measured the school team existence; the fourth variable measured the school team meeting frequency. Two dimensions have been created, the first is “Nomothetic Dimension – School Effects ” and the second is “Idiographic Dimension – Personal Effects”.
There are six research questions. First, how does the
personal and school variables impact the team importance perception? Second, how does the personal and school variables influence school team existence, its size and the team meetings frequency trough the school team importance perception? Third, which dimension influence more the team importance perception? Fourth, which dimension affects more team existence? Fifth, which dimension determine more team size? Finally, which dimension influence more on team meetings frequency? The only hypothesis is, that there will be differences among the three groups of the sample : Arab male principals, Jewish male principals and Jewish female principals with respect to the above questions. 4
Differences among the three groups of principals on
the four variables were examined by one way analysis of variance. Subsequently, multiple regression and logistic regression will utilize for a path analysis model.
The research findings indicate, on the one hand, that
personal and school variables explain small percentages of the variance in the team importance perception and team size variance. On the other hand, the same variables explain larger percentages of the variance in team meeting frequency and the team existence. In addition, school variables explain larger percentages of variance than the personal variables in the dependent variables. Specifically, in the Arab principals group, the nomothetic dimension, explains high percentages of variance of team existence and team size. Jewish principals, male and female, have higher percentages variance of team-meetings frequency than Arab principals.
The findings also indicate differences among the
three principal groups in team existence. In addition, differences have been found between Arab principals and Jewish principals in team meeting frequency. Also, the Jewish female principals differ from Jewish male principals and Arab principals in team importance perception. Finally, 5
there is difference between Jewish male principals and
Arab male principals in the team size.
Logistic regression shows that school level, school
size and team importance perception increase the probability of team existence. Arab principals differ from Jewish principals in team existence. For Jewish female principals, the school level is the dominant determinant team existence.
In summary, school size, school level, students level
and team importance perception influence team size. Principals’ education, school level and school size influence team meeting frequency. Interestingly, the path analysis results show small influence of the independent variables among the three groups of principals.