TESOL Certificate Programs

Rubric for Written Assignments V4

Student Name: Claudia Walukouw Date: September 4, 2018 Instructor Name: Sapir Levin Class: Grammar Structure/Methods Assignment: Lesson Reflection

Item No relevant evidence Unsatisfactory (60% Needs Improvement (70% Meets Expectations (80 Exceeds Expectations (90%
(0 – 59%) - 69 %) - 79%) – 89%) - 100%)
Content & The assignment was not Ideas are not well developed Ideas are somewhat developed, and Ideas are developed, and Ideas are fully developed, and
Ideas submitted, or the or may fail to demonstrate an demonstrate some understanding of demonstrate an accurate demonstrate a significant and
submitted assignment understanding of the task. the task. Main point(s) and understanding of the task. Main accurate understanding of the
70/70 was not relevant to the Main ideas, or examples/details may be included but point(s) and supporting task. Main point(s) and examples/
task at hand. examples/details, may be not well integrated. examples/details are clear and easily details are identifiable, clear, and
obscure or missing. identifiable. engaging for the reader.

Evidence & The assignment was not When required, outside When required, outside evidence may When required, relevant outside When required, compelling
APA Format submitted, or the evidence may be missing or be minimal or may not fully support evidence is included. It supports outside evidence is included; it is
submitted assignment may fail to support claims. claims. Paper may not follow APA claims. Paper follows APA format seamlessly integrated into the
lacked evidence from Paper may not meet basic format entirely or may have errors in with few errors in citation/style. paper to support claims. Paper
outside sources and APA requirements for APA citation/style. follows APA format with no errors
10/ 10 formatting. format. in citation or style.

Organization The assignment was not The organization is not The organization is somewhat The organization is effective for the The organization is highly effective
& Standards submitted, or the effective for the task, or there effective for the task, although it may task. The organization is clear and for the task. Organization
submitted assignment is a lack of organization. be loose or unclear. There may be logical. Transitions and connectors skillfully and logically builds
organized in an Errors with transitions and some errors with transitions and are used appropriately. Paper meets support for the thesis. Transitions
appropriate or effective connectors interfere with connectors. Paper may not meet all most requirements for title, word and connectors are used
10/ 10 way given the task at comprehensibility. Paper requirements for title, word count, count, spacing, etc. appropriately and seamlessly
hand. may not meet basic spacing, etc. Paper meets requirements for title,
requirements for title, word word count, spacing, etc.
count, spacing, etc.

Usage & The assignment was not Linguistic features of the
Mechanics submitted, or the writing (syntax, usage, word
submitted assignment form, tone/register, spelling,
was not relevant to the capitalization, punctuation,
task at hand. etc.) are not effective. Errors
10/ 10 are very distracting and/or
interfere greatly with the
comprehensibility of the
message. The writing is not
professional or academic.
Linguistic features of the writing
(syntax, usage, word form,
tone/register, spelling, capitalization,
punctuation, etc.) are somewhat
effective. The errors may be
distracting and/or interfere with the
comprehensibility of the message.
The writing may not be professional
or academic.
Linguistic features of the writing
(syntax, usage, word form,
tone/register, spelling,
capitalization, punctuation, etc.) are
effective. There may be a few
errors, but they do not interfere with
the comprehensibility of the
message. The writing is generally
professional/academic.
Linguistic features of the writing
(syntax, usage, word form,
tone/register, spelling,
capitalization, punctuation, etc.)
are highly effective. There are no
apparent errors. The writing is
very professional and academic.

Score: 100/100