Sei sulla pagina 1di 3

EMPIRICAL PHASE - Paper & Pencil test answered in writing • May provide socially acceptable

- Person, mail or internet – most answers


2 STEPS conveniently clarify misunderstanding. • No opportunity to clarify items
1. Collecting the Data - Cover letter should accompany a • Must be literate.
- where and when data will be questionnaire. • Must not be a representative of the
collected. Guidelines: population
- what, who, where, when and how. • Adequate margin & spacing • May fail to answer items
- describes participants • Should be neat in appearance &
grammatically correct and no typing errors. 2. Interview
Important points to Remember • Should be kept short as possible - Face to face encounter or through
Researchers must: • State questions in an affirmative telephone call
- Maintain confidentiality manner - Oral exam
- Should be serious in keeping their • Avoid ambiguous questions (avoid Categories:
appointment. double (-) questions) a. Unstructured – not formal
- Participants should be informed time
• Should contain neutral wording. b. Structured – set of questions
and place their pressure are required.
• Information on how to complete the c. Semi-structured and promoting (ad lib)
- Enough materials are available to
questionnaire must be clear & concise. questions.
complete the study.
Types of Questions Guidelines:
Important Dimensions:
a. Demographic questions Before:
1. Structure - Important to introduce yourself &
• Structured Method - Sex, age, educational background, explain purpose of the study.
- Limited opportunities to explain. religion - How they are chosen & how info will be
- Includes fixed set of question to be b. Open-ended questions used.
answered. - Essay-type - How long interview will take.
• Unstructured Method c. Close-ended questions During:
- No formal instrument - True/false - Ensure comfortable atmosphere.
- “essay type” - Must have no overlapping - Subjects should be in a comfortable
- Very hard to analyze. - Should be complete choices position (maintain personal distance).
d. Contingency questions - Undesired noises must be controlled.
2. Quantifiability - Follow-up questions - Should use language that is understood
- Subjective to analysis must be e. Filler questions by subjects & talk in conversational
gathered in such a way that data can - Fill in the blank tone.
be quantified. - Purpose of the study would not be very - Should be informed that there are no
obvious. wrong right answers.
3. Researcher’s Obtrusiveness - Sensitive questions should be asked
- Obviousness of the researcher Advantage last.
• Quick and inexpensive After:
4. Objectivity • Easy to test its reliability and validity - Ask for any questions.
- No feelings • Adm. Is less time consuming than - Common courtesy (must be thanked
- Evident when 2 independent interview for participation.
researchers arrive at similar • Data can be obtained in a widespread - Further explanations may be made.
observations geographical area. - Respondents: how to obtain results.
- Checklist • Respondents can remain anonymous Advantage:
- In depth questions are obtained.
Major types of Data Collecting Method: Disadvantage - Response rate is high.
A. Self – Reports • Mailing will be costly. - Nonverbal & verbal manners can be
- Good deal of information can be • Response rate is low (needs observed.
gathered by questioning people. participants who are literate) - Can be obtained in a wide range of
Ex. subjects.
1. Questionnaire - Data are usable.
Disadvantage: - Client’s welfare should take - Internal Consistency Reliability-
- Training programs are needed. precedence. all items measure the same
- Time consuming & expensive. - Researches must determine how & variable.
- Arrangement may be difficult to make. when observations will be made. - Split half method can be used
- May provide socially acceptable C. Biophysiologic Measures to measure this.
responses (subjective) - BP, stool, v/s. 3. Validity – degree to which an instrument
- Subject may be (anxious) influenced by - Physical data of subject. measure swhat is approved.
interviewer’s characteristics. - More objective & accurate than any Types:
- May misinterpret nonverbal behavior. other data collection methods. - Face validity- instrument shows
Types: that its measuring what’s
B. Observation Method 1. Vivo Measurements supposed to be measured.
- Systematic collection. - BP, stool, v/s - Content validity- concerned
- Uses senses. - Highly complex instruments system. with the scope or range of
a. Structured- checklist (guide) 2. Vitro Measurements items used to measure the
b. Unstructured- don’t knew what will - Blood tests, CBS. variable.
happen next. - Take something from the body then to - Criterion validity- not only
Phenomena Amenable the lab. based on questions but to
- Characteristic & condition of individual. Advantage: other criteria.
- Act & behavior. - Reliable, accurate, & precise. - involved determining the
- Skills attainment & performance. - Objective relationship between an
- Verbal communication. - Provides vital measures of targeted instrument and an external
- Nonverbal communication. variables criterion.
- Environmental characteristics. - Available equipment in hospital setting.
Categories - Cost may be low.
A. Non- Participant Observer- Overt Disadvantage:
- Participants are aware with no - Presence of certain data
participation. ATTITUDE SCALES
- May adversely influence the subjects.
- Clearly identified as researcher. - No interferences that may create
1. Likert Scales – agree, undecided,
B. Non- Participant Observer- Covert artifacts in measurements.
disagree
- With consent - Special expertise may be necessary to
2. Semantic Differential Scales
- One who doesn’t before the use some of these devices.
- Friendly, 7654321
beginning of data collection Criteria for D/C Selection of Instruments:
- Indicate their position about some
identifies him to the subjects 1. Practicality of the instruments- cost &
concept along continuum between 2
who are being observed. appropriateness.
adjectives.
- Subject will not alter behavior. 2. Reliability- consistent & stable
- Rate a concept on a series of opposite
- Non- ethical. Types:
adjectives.
C. Participant Observer- Overt - Stability Reliability- consistency
- Becomes involved with subject over time.
Visual Analogue Scale
openly & with full awareness of -Similar results are obtained.
those people being observed. -Correlation coefficient is used. - To measure subject exposure such as
- Equivalence Reliability- 2 pain, fatigue and dyspnea
D. Participant Observer- Covert
- Straight line (100mm long)
- Not Ethical instruments / observers with
- Spy same result.
- Interacts with subjects & - Concerns the degree to which
2. Preparing the Data for Analysis
observes their behavior with 2 different forms of an
their knowledge. instruments obtain the same
Preliminary Activities
Points to Remember: result, 2 or more observers
- Examine questionnaire to determine if
- Training sessions will be necessary. using a single instrument
they are usable
- Preferable to have more than 1 obtain the same exits.
observer = reliability.
- Assign identification no. to the
responses or observations of different
subjects.
- Coding of data / Translation of data in
numeric forms
- Written document to compute files
- Transferring the data from written docs
into computer files for subsequent analysis.

Potrebbero piacerti anche