Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Effect of Nanoparticles in Working Fluid on Thermal Performance of Solar
Parabolic Trough Collector
PII: S0167-7322(16)30738-3
DOI: doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.06.091
Reference: MOLLIQ 5998
Please cite this article as: Seiyed E. Ghasemi, A. Ranjbar, Effect of Nanoparticles in
Working Fluid on Thermal Performance of Solar Parabolic Trough Collector, Journal of
Molecular Liquids (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.06.091
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.
As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript.
The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof
before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process
errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that
apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
T
Seiyed E. Ghasemi , A. Ranjbar
IP
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Qaemshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qaemshahr,
R
Iran
SC
NU
Abstract
In this work, forced convection heat transfer turbulent flow inside receiver tube of
MA
solar parabolic trough collector with nanofluids as working fluid is numerically
simulated. The study is applied for CuO-water and Al2O3-water nanofluids. The
D
hydrodynamic and heat transfer coefficients by means of finite volume method. This
analysis is carried out based on k–ε RNG turbulent model for different heat flux
conditions. The effect of volume fraction (ϕ) of nanofluids on thermal and
P
nanoparticle volume fraction, the average Nusselt number and friction factor increase
for both nanofluids. Furthermore, Adding Al2O3 and CuO nano-particles (ϕ=3%) to
water enhances the heat transfer by 28% and 35%, respectively.
1. Introduction
Corresponding author:
E-mail: ghasemi.seiyed.e@gmail.com
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Solar energy is the largest and most widely renewable energy source available in the
world. So, direct utilization of solar energy into useful energy is important. There are
so many solar thermal systems in which parabolic trough solar collector is the most
common type of high-temperature solar thermal systems. Figure 1 shows schematic
T
of parabolic trough solar collector in which solar irradiation is focused on receiver
IP
tube by parabolic concentrator and then thermal energy is transferred to the passing
R
working fluid in the receiver tube.
SC
Fig.1---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NU
Lu et al. [1] studied the nonuniform heat transfer model and performance of
parabolic trough solar receiver theoretically due to the energy balances between the
MA
heat transfer fluid, absorber tube, glass envelope and surroundings. The absorber
tube and glass envelope were both divided into two regions for uneven solar
radiation and wall temperature distribution, and then a nonuniform heat transfer
D
model of solar receiver was established. According to the calculation results, the heat
TE
loss of solar receiver from the nonuniform model was a little higher than that from
the uniform model. As a conclusion, the heat transfer performances of parabolic
P
(compound parabolic concentrator) and open thermosyphon using the water based
CuO nanofluid as the working fluid was designed to provide air with high and
moderate temperature by Liu et al. [2]. The detailed experimental investigation of the
air outlet temperature of the system, system collecting efficiency was conducted to
compare collecting performances of collectors using nanofluid as open
thermosyphon’s working fluid with that using water. Experimental results showed
that the collector with open thermosyphon has a much more outstanding collecting
performance compared with the collector with concentric tube. Further, if
substituting nanofluid for water as the working fluid of open thermosyphon, the
collecting performance will have significant improvement.
Ghasemi et al.[3] studied the performance of parabolic solar collector with three
segmental rings numerically. They investigated the effect of three segmental rings
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
size on the thermal efficiency of receiver tube. The working fluid was syltherm 800
and the analysis was carried out based on renormalization-group (RNG) k–ℇ
turbulent model. Their numerical simulation was implemented for a constant distance
between three segmental rings. They concluded that by decreasing the inner diameter
T
of three segmental rings, the Nusselt number increases, but with considering the
IP
pressure loss, thermal performance decreases.
R
A detailed numerical model based on Large Eddy Simulations (LES) models for
SC
simulating the fluid flow and heat transfer around a parabolic trough solar collector
(PTC) and its receiver tube was presented by Hachicha et al. [4]. Their study
NU
provided a quantitative assessment of velocity, pressure and temperature fields
around an isolated parabolic solar collector and its receiver. Numerical results
matched experimental ones, although some discrepancies are observed due to the
MA
unsteady flow behaviour. Furthermore, the instantaneous flow around the parabola
were studied for different pitch angles in order to explain the variation of the
aerodynamic coefficients. It was shown that the horizontal position ?? = 90
D
is the
most favourable position for the PTC to work where the drag forces are lower and
TE
the dynamic behavior of a parabolic trough solar system for direct steam generation
CE
consistently close agreement with experimental time series data for different
categories of transients which include variations in solar radiation, inlet mass water
flow and outlet steam pressure. The overall mean squared error between computed
and measured temperature values was lower than 6% for considered all cases.
Moreover, the pressure drop predictions and measurements showed a mean squared
error ranging from 4% to 12%. They concluded that the adopted boiling model
shows a very good performance and the results presented in their work support the
applicability of CFD modeling to study dynamics of direct steam generation in
parabolic-trough solar collectors.
Ghasemi et al.[6] investigated the heat transfer characteristics of parabolic solar
collector with two segmental rings numerically. Their numerical simulation was
implemented for different distances between two segmental rings. They found that
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
use of two segmental rings in tubular solar absorber enhances the heat transfer
characteristics of solar parabolic collector. Also their result shows that by decreasing
the distance between two segmental rings,the heat transfer coefficient increases.
Suresh et al.[7] investigated an experimental study on the convective heat transfer
T
and friction factor characteristics in circular tube with spiraled rod under turbulent
IP
flow with constant heat flux is carried out with distilled water and Al2O3-water
R
nanofluids. They concluded that heat transfer enhancement is caused by suspending
SC
nanoparticles and becomes more pronounced with the increase of the particle volume
concentration.
NU
Bianco et al.[8] studied numerically developing laminar forced convection flow of a
water–Al2O3 nanofluid in a circular tube With uniform heat flux at the wall.They
showed that Heat transfer enhancement increases with the particle volume
MA
concentration, but it is accompanied by increasing wall shear stress values.
A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study was carried out to study the heat
transfer and pressure drop characteristics of water-based Al2O3 nanofluid flowing
D
thermophysical properties of nanofluid and water were used and heat exchangers
were analyzed considering conjugate heat transfer from hot fluid in the inner-coiled
P
tube to cold fluid in the annulus region. nanoparticles volume concentrations were in
CE
the range of 0.5%, 1.0% and 2.0%. Nanofluid flows inside inner tube side or annular
side. The results obtained showed a different behavior depending on the parameter
AC
selected for the comparison with the base fluid. Moreover, when compared at the
same Reynolds number, the heat transfer coefficient increases by increasing the
nanoparticles volume concentration.
A numerical analysis of entropy generation in a parabolic trough collector’s solar
receiver was carried out for different concentration ratios, inlet temperatures and
flow rates by Mwesigye et al. [10]. Using temperature dependent thermal properties
of the heat transfer fluid, the entropy generation due to heat transfer across a finite
temperature difference and entropy generation due to fluid friction in the receiver
was determined. Results showed a reduction in the entropy generation rate as the
inlet temperature increases and an increase in the entropy generation rate as the
concentration ratio increases. Results further showed that, there is an optimal flow
rate at which the entropy generated is a minimum, for every combination of
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
concentration ratio and inlet temperature. The optimal flowrates at which the entropy
generated is minimum are presented for different flow rate and concentration ratio,
and the results are the same irrespective of the inlet temperature considered.
Yousefi et al.[11] investigated experimentally the effect of Al2O3–water nanofluid, as
T
working fluid, on the efficiency of a flat-plate solar collector. The results show that
IP
in comparison with water as absorption medium using the nanofluids as working
R
fluid increase the efficiency. also it can be concluded that the surfactant causes an
SC
enhancement in heat transfer.
Therefore the aim of the current study is to examine the performance of solar
NU
parabolic trough collector with nanofluids under turbulent flow condition. The fluid
in the receiver tube is a water based nanofluid containing different type of
nanoparticles: CuO and Al2O3. The effects of nanoparticles volume fraction and
MA
Reynolds number on flow and heat transfer characteristics are illustrated.
D
2. Mathematical Modelling
TE
working fluid throw to the receiver tube outlet. The receiver tube with a length(L) of
CE
Fig.2---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 1------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The governing equations for turbulent nanofluid flow, three-dimensional and steady-
state, are the continuity, momentum and energy equations in a (R,θ,Z) coordinate
system form given by [13]:
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Continuity equation:
.(V) 0 (1)
T
IP
Where V = (VR, Vθ, VZ) is the velocity field.
R
Momentum equation:
SC
p (2)
.(VVi ) .(Vi ) Si
Xi
NU
Where Xi = R, θ, Z refers to a spatial direction.The terms Si (Remaining viscous
MA
terms) in the Eq. (2) are given as follows:
D
V V 2 V (3)
S1 V R2 ( 2 )
R R R
P
CE
2 V V V (4)
S2 ( 2 ) R 2 VR
R R R
S3 0 (5)
Energy equation:
.(VCp T) .(kT) (6)
T
IP
m m f m p f f p p (7)
nf
R
nf f vp f vp
(1 )f p
SC
NU
For determining of specific heat of nanofluids, proposed model of Xuan and Roetzel
[15] is used (with assumption of heat equilibrium with nanoparticles and base fluid):
MA
Q Qf Q p (Cp )f f (Cp ) p p (8)
(Cp ) nf nf nf
mT nf (mf m p )T f f p p
(1 )(Cp )f (Cp ) p
D
TE
Thus
P
CE
nf
Thermal conductivity for single phase nanofluid is presented by chon et al. [16]:
knf (10)
1 64.7 0.746 (d f / d p )0.369 (k p / k f )0.7476 Pr f 0.9955 Re p1.2321
kf
f kT
Where dp, df, Pr and Re f 2b are molecular diameter of base fluid,
f f 3f f
mean diameter of nanoparticles, Prandtl number and Brownian Reynolds number
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
respectively. Mean free path of water molecules (λm) is 0.17nm [17]. For water,
dynamic viscosity is a function of temperature expressed as [17]:
T
IP
Where A, B and C constants are 2.414 105 , 247.8 and 140 respectively. Brownian
R
velocity of particles is calculated as [18]:
SC
kB kB 1 (12)
VBr
NU
3 f d p f 3 d p f A10B /(T C )
MA
2.3. Boundary Conditions
The receiver is considered symmetric about its vertical axis. Therefore only half
D
The flow is having uniform velocity at atmosphere temperature at the receiver inlet:
CE
d
0r , - 90 < 90
2
d
u 0@ r
2 (14)
90 -90 , 0 L 2
q Ig
(15)
0 90 , 0 L 2
T
IP
q Ib CR
(16)
R
90 0 , 0 L 2
SC
Ap
Where Ib 650 w 2 , Ig 750 w 2 and CR
m m Ar
NU
MA
(iii) Zero pressure gradient condition is employed across the outlet boundary.
(iv) Symmetry boundary conditions are applied for the receiver
D
3. Numerical Procedure
TE
The geometrical model is created and meshed using commercial software GAMBIT.
In this model, triangular and hybrid/tetragonal mesh were used for inlet/outlet faces
P
The governing equations were solved using finite volume method by segregated
implicit solver with first order formulation with CFD commercial software
AC
pressure is body force weighted to take the density variations in consideration. The
solution is based on pressure correction method and uses SIMPLEC algorithm [20].
The first order upwind differencing scheme is used for momentum and energy
equations. The solution is considered to be converged sufficiently when the
T
normalized residual of 10-3 for momentum and mass and 10-6 for energy equations.
IP
The simulations were carried out for fully developed flow conditions Heat transfer
R
coefficient from the receiver to the fluid is given by :
SC
q
hf (17)
Twi Tref
hf d
Nu (18)
kf
D
TE
Fig.3---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P
CE
In order to ensure that the numerical results are accurate, a grid independence study
has been carried out. To find the most suitable size of mesh, grid independent test is
performed for four grids (348254, 775852, 1478541, 2965324 cells). Nusselt number
has been estimated for all four grids and results are compared. Comparison of the
results (see Fig.4) shows that the grid with 1,478,541 mesh cells is found sufficient
for current study.
Fig.4---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The model validation is done based on comparing current numerical results of the
Nusselt number and friction factor of pure water flowing in the receiver tube of
collector with Petukhov experimental correlations. The Petukhov correlation for the
fully developed turbulent flow in circular tubes is given by [22]:
T
IP
f
Re.Pr
R
Nu 8 for 104 Re 5 106 (1)
Pr 1
1
f
SC
2 2
1.07 12.7 3
8
NU
The friction factor correlation from Petukhov [18] is of the form:
MA
f 0.79Ln Re 1.64
-2
(2)
It can be seen that the present CFD results agree fairly well with the correlations used
D
for comparison (Eq. (1) and Eq. (2)) , with a maximum difference of 4.1% and 5.5%,
TE
Fig.5---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AC
Moreover, the present study for the receiver tube with nanofluid is also compared
with Suresh et al.[7] (Fig. 6(a) and Fig. 6(b)) , and it is observed that the maximum
deviation between the present numerical results and the experimental study of Suresh
et al.[7] are approximately 5.4% and 6.7%, respectively for Nusselt number and
friction factor.
Fig.6---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The effect of nanofluids with the same diameter (30nm) on thermal performance of
parabolic trough was studied. Results were illustrated with different volume fraction
and two types of nanofluids in relative nusselt number and relative friction factor.
Finally contours of temperature field on surface concentrator for different Reynolds
T
number were presented.
IP
Fig.7 shows the relative nusselt number versus Reynolds number for Al2O3
R
nanoparticle in different volume fraction. As indicated, the relative nusselt number is
SC
more than one that causes adding Al2O3 nanoparticle in the base fluid(water). The
nanoparticles have significant thermal conductivity enhancement in water [23]. It can
NU
be found that using of Al2O3-water nanofluid as working fluid in the receiver tube of
collector improves the heat transfer characteristics of solar system. Also this figure
shows that with increasing of volume fraction of Al2O3 nanoparticle, the relative
MA
nusselt number increases causes the increasing of fluid thermal conductivity.
Fig.7---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D
TE
Fig.8 reveals the variations of the relative Nusselt number versus Reynolds number
for CuO nanoparticle in different volume fraction. This figure shows using CuO-
P
water nanofluid instead of pure water enhances Nusselt number. Also, increasing the
CE
Fig.8---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fig.9 shows the relative friction factor versus Reynolds number for Al2O3
nanoparticle in different volume fraction. Pure water has low viscosity but with
adding nanoparticles in pure water, the viscosity of fluid enhances thus the relative
friction factor is more than one. As shown in Fig. 8, increasing of volume fraction of
Al2O3 nanoparticle, the relative friction factor increases causes the increasing of
fluid viscosity.
Fig.9---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The relative friction factor versus Reynolds number for CuO nanoparticle in different
volume fraction is plotted in Fig.10. It is clear that using CuO-water nanofluid
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
instead of pure water enhances friction factor. Also, increasing the volume fraction
of nanofluids enhances the friction factor as shown in Fig. 10.
Fig.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
T
R IP
Fig.11 illustrated velocity contours at outlet for different Reynolds number with
SC
CuO-water nanofluid in constant volume fraction (ϕ=%1.5).
NU
Fig.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MA
5. Conclusion
D
TE
different volume fraction of nanofluids and Reynolds numbers. The heat transfer and
CE
pressure drop characteristics were evaluated and compared for the conventional parabolic
collectors and nanofluid based collectors. The simulation results obviously showed that
the adding of nanoparticles produced a considerable enhancement of the Nusselt
AC
number with respect to that of the base fluid. It was also shown that heat transfer
enhancement was increasing with the volume fraction of nanofluids. For each studied
volume fraction value, increase of thermal feature of solar parabolic trough collector
was higher for the CuO-water nanofluid. On the other hand, at the same Reynolds
number and volume fraction the friction factor was lower for Al2O3-water nanofluid.
References
[1] Jianfeng Lu, Jing Ding, Jianping Yang, Xiaoxi Yang, “Nonuniform heat transfer
model and performance of parabolic trough solar receiver”, Energy, 59, (2013), 666-
675.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[2] Zhen-Hua Liu, Ren-Lin Hu, Lin Lu, Feng Zhao, Hong-shen Xiao, “Thermal
performance of an open thermosyphon using nanofluid for evacuated tubular high
temperature air solar collector”, Energy Conversion and Management, 73, (2013),
135–143.
T
[3] Seyed Ebrahim Ghasemi, Ali Akbar Ranjbar, Abbas Ramiar, “ Numerical Study
IP
on Thermal Performance of Solar Parabolic Trough Collector”, Journal of
R
mathematics and computer Science, 7, (2013), 1–12.
SC
[4] A.A. Hachicha, I. Rodriguez, J. Castro, A. Oliva, “Numerical simulation of wind
flow around a parabolic trough solar Collector”, Applied Energy, 107, (2013), 426–
NU
437.
[5] David H. Lobón, Loreto Valenzuela, Emilio Baglietto, “Modeling the dynamics
of the multiphase fluid in the parabolic-trough solar steam generating systems”,
MA
Energy Conversion and Management, 78, (2014), 393–404.
[6] Seyed Ebrahim Ghasemi, Ali Akbar Ranjbar, Abbas Ramiar, “Three-dimensional
Numerical Analysis of Heat Transfer Characteristics of Solar Parabolic Collector
D
(2013), 89–100.
[7] S.Suresh, P.Selvakumar, M.Chandrasekar, V.Srinivasa Raman,“Experimental
P
under turbulent flow with spiraled rod inserts”, Chemical Engineering and
Processing, 53, (2012) , 24– 30.
AC
T
1967.
IP
[14] K. Khanafer, K. Vafai, “A critical synthesis of thermophysical characteristics of
R
nanofluids”, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 54, (2011), 4410-4428.
SC
[15] Y. Xuan, W. Roetzel, “Conceptions for heat transfer correlation of nanofluids”,
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 43, (2000) ,3701–3707.
[16] C.H. Chon, K.D. Kihm, S.P. Lee, S.U.S. Choi, “Empirical correlation finding
NU
the role of temperature and particle size for nanofluid (Al2O3) thermal conductivity
enhancement”, Journal of Physics, 87, (2005), 1–3.
MA
[17] H.A. Mintsa, G. Roy, C.T. Nguyen, D. Doucet, “New temperature dependent
thermal conductivity data for water-based nanofluids”, Int. J. Therm. Sci. ,48, (2009),
363-371.
D
York, 1956.
[19] Fluent Inc., Fluent 6.2 user’s guide. Lebanon: NH,(2005).
P
thermal radiation in a curved pipe with uniform wall temperature”, Numer Heat
Transfer A – Appl;44:149–67, (2003).
AC
T
R IP
SC
NU
MA
D
P TE
CE
T
R IP
SC
NU
Fig. 2. Schematic of receiver tube of parabolic trough collector
MA
D
P TE
CE
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
T
R IP
SC
NU
MA
D
TE
T
R IP
SC
NU
MA
D
TE
T
R IP
SC
NU
MA
D
Fig. 5.a. Validation of present model for pure water with Petukhov correlations[12] : (a) Nusselt
TE
number
P
CE
AC
Fig. 5.b. Validation of present model for pure water with Petukhov correlations[12] : (b)
friction factor
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
T
R IP
SC
NU
MA
D
Fig. 6.a. Validation of present model for nanofluid with Suresh et al.[7] : (a) Nusselt number
P TE
CE
AC
Fig. 6.b. Validation of present model for nanofluid with Suresh et al.[7] : (b) friction factor
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
T
R IP
SC
NU
MA
D
T
R IP
SC
NU
MA
D
T
R IP
SC
NU
MA
D
P TE
T
R IP
SC
NU
MA
D
TE
Fig. 10. relative Friction factor of CuO nanofluid at different volume fraction
P
CE
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
T
IP
R
SC
NU
MA
D
PTE
CE
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
T
IP
R
SC
NU
MA
D
PTE
CE
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
T
R IP
SC
NU
MA
D
P TE
CE
Fig.11. velocity contours for different Reynolds number with CuO-water nanofluid when
AC
ϕ=%1.5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
T
ρ(kg/m3)
IP
Material Cp(J/kg.K) K(W/m.K)
R
CuO 6500 535.6 20
SC
Al2O3 3970 765 40
NU
MA
D
P TE
CE
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Highlights
A CFD analysis on thermal and fluid effects of nanofluid as working fluid for solar
parabolic trough collector was carried out.
T
number with respect to that of the base fluid.
IP
The heat transfer enhancement was increasing with the volume fraction of
R
nanofluids.
SC
NU
MA
D
P TE
CE
AC