Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Aspen Plus, the aspen leaf logo and Plantelligence and Enterprise Optimization are trademarks or registered
trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc., Bedford, MA.
All other brand and product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies.
This software includes NIST Standard Reference Database 103b: NIST Thermodata Engine Version 7.1
This document is intended as a guide to using AspenTech's software. This documentation contains AspenTech
proprietary and confidential information and may not be disclosed, used, or copied without the prior consent of
AspenTech or as set forth in the applicable license agreement. Users are solely responsible for the proper use of
the software and the application of the results obtained.
Although AspenTech has test ed the software and reviewed the documentation, the sole warranty for the software
may be found in the applicable license agreement between AspenTech and the user. ASPENTECH MAKES NO
WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO THIS DOCUMENTATION,
ITS QUALITY, PERFORMANCE, MERCHANTABILITY, OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Revision History 1
Contents
Revision History ......................................................................................................1
Contents..................................................................................................................2
Introduction ............................................................................................................3
1 Components .........................................................................................................4
2 Physical Properties...............................................................................................5
3 Reactions ...........................................................................................................26
6 Conclusions ........................................................................................................32
References ............................................................................................................33
2 Contents
Introduction
This file describes an Aspen Plus model of the CO2 and H2S capture process by
mixed solvent composed of sulfolane, DIPA and water. As process simulation
is not within the scope of current phase of this work, we only give a single
stage flash model to simulate the CO2 and H2S absorption by aqueous
sulfolane-DIPA solution. Thermophysical property models are developed
based on the work of Zhang and Chen (2010) [1,2] and Aspen Technology
(2011)[3]. Reaction kinetic models are based on the works of Pinsent et al.
(1956)[4] and Blauwhoff et al. (1985)[5]. Transport property models and model
parameters have been validated against experimental data from open
literature.
The model includes the following key features:
True species including ions
Unsymmetric electrolyte NRTL activity coefficient model for liquid and PC-
SAFT equation of state for vapor
Activity-based reaction kinetics
Electrolyte transport property models
Introduction 3
1 Components
4 1 Components
2 Physical Properties
PC-SAFT pure component parameters for DIPA are regressed against the
vapor pressure data generated from the Antoine equation [3] and experimental
data on liquid density[7,18]. The parameters of the ideal gas heat capacity
correlations for DIPA and sulfolane are then respectively obtained by fitting
the experimental liquid heat capacity data of DIPA [19] and liquid heat capacity
6 2 Physical Properties
set to 1 (mixture viscosity weighted by mass fraction), 1 (always use
Jones and Dole equation when the parameters are available), and 2
(ASPEN liquid mixture viscosity model), respectively. The interaction
parameters between DIPA and H 2O in the ASPEN liquid mixture viscosity
model, MUKIJ and MULIJ, are regressed against experimental DIPA-H2O
viscosity data from Henni et al. (2003)[18]. MUKIJ and MULIJ for sulfolane-
H2O binary are regressed against experimental sulfolane-H2O viscosity
data from the literature[22, 34-42, 44]. The Jones-Dole model parameters,
IONMUB, of CO3-2 is regressed against K 2CO3-H2O viscosity data from Pac
et al. (1984)[45], that of HCO3- is regressed against KHCO3-H2O viscosity
data from Palaty (1992)[46], and that of HS- is regressed against MDEA-
H2O-H2S viscosity data from Rinker et al. (2000) [47]. For DIPAH+ and
DIPACOO-, IONMUB/1 are missing and IONMUB/2 are defaulted as 0.
For liquid surface tension, the Onsager-Samaras model, called SIG2ONSG
in Aspen Plus, is used with its option codes being -9 (exponent in mixing
rule) and 1 (electrolyte system), respectively. No additional adjusted
parameters are used in the surface tension.
For thermal conductivity, the Riedel electrolyte correction model, called
KL2RDL in Aspen Plus, is used.
For binary diffusivity, the Nernst-Hartley model, called DL1NST in Aspen
Plus, is used with option code of 1 (mixture viscosity weighted by mass
fraction).
In addition to the updates with the above transport properties, the Gibbs free
energy in aqueous phase infinite dilution at 298.15 K (DGAQFM) and the
enthalpy of formation in aqueous phase infinite dilution at 298.15 K
(DHAQFM) for DIPAH+ are calculated from the experimental chemical
equilibrium constant of the reaction DIPAH H 2 O DIPA H 3 O as
reported by Hamborg and Versteeg (2009) [48]. Likewise, DGAQFM and
DHAQFM for DIPACOO- are calculated from the experimental chemical
equilibrium constant of the reaction DIPACOO H 2 O DIPA HCO 3 as
reported by Blauwhoff et al. (1985) [5]. The heat capacities in aqueous phase
at infinite dilution (CPAQ0) for DIPAH + and DIPACOO- are obtained by
assuming the aqueous phase infinite dilution heat capacity change for the
above two reactions to be zero. The CPAQ0 of HCO3-, CO3-2 and HS- are the
average values of heat capacity between 298 K and 473 K taken from Criss
and Cobble (1968) [49], and that of S -2 is calculated from the Criss-Cobble
correlation[49] with the entropy value from Wagman et al. (1982)[50].
The estimation results of various transport and thermal properties are
summarized in Figures 1-35:
1100
1000
Density, kg/m3
600
0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
CO2 loading (m ol CO2/ m ol DIPA)
1200
1000
800
Density, kg/m3
600
400
8 2 Physical Properties
1200
1000
800
Density, kg/m3
600
400
EST Sulfolane 5wt%+DIPA 5wt%
200 EST Sulfolane 10wt%+DIPA 10wt%
EST Sulfolane 15wt%+DIPA 15wt%
EST Sulfolane 20wt%+DIPA 20wt%
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
CO2 loading (m ol CO2/ m ol DIPA)
1200
1000
800
Density, kg/m3
600
400
EST Sulfolane 5wt%+DIPA 5wt%
200 EST Sulfolane 10wt%+DIPA 10wt%
EST Sulfolane 15wt%+DIPA 15wt%
EST Sulfolane 20wt%+DIPA 20wt%
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
H2S loading (m ol H2S/m ol DIPA)
0.01
Viscosity, PaS
0.001
0.0001
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
CO2 loading (m ol CO2/ m ol DIPA)
0.1
EST DIPA 10wt%
EST DIPA 20wt%
EST DIPA 30wt%
EST DIPA 40wt%
0.01
Viscosity, PaS
0.001
0.0001
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
H2S loading (m ol H2S/m ol DIPA)
10 2 Physical Properties
0.01
Viscosity, PaS
0.001
0.0001
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
CO2 loading (m ol CO2/ m ol DIPA)
0.01
Viscosity, PaS
0.001
0.0001
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
H2S loading (m ol H2S/ m ol DIPA)
0.06
0.04
0.03
0.02
EST DIPA 10wt%
EST DIPA 20wt%
0.01 EST DIPA 30wt%
EST DIPA 40wt%
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
CO2 loading (m ol CO2/ m ol DIPA)
0.07
0.06
Surface Tension, N/m
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
EST DIPA 10wt%
0.01 EST DIPA 20wt%
EST DIPA 30wt%
EST DIPA 40wt%
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
H2S loading (m ol H2S/m ol DIPA)
12 2 Physical Properties
0.08
0.07
0.06
Surface Tension, N/m
0.05
0.04
0.03
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
CO2 loading (m ol CO2/ m ol DIPA)
0.08
0.07
0.06
Surface Tension, N/m
0.05
0.04
0.03
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
H2S loading (m ol H2S/ m ol DIPA)
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.6
0.5
Thermal Cnductivity, Watt/m-K
0.4
0.3
0.2
EST DIPA 10wt%
EST DIPA 20wt%
0.1 EST DIPA 30wt%
EST DIPA 40wt%
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
H2S loading (m ol H2S/m ol DIPA)
14 2 Physical Properties
0.6
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.6
0.5
Thermal Cnductivity, Watt/m-K
0.4
0.3
0.2
4500
4000
Heat Capacity, J/kg-K 3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
EST DIPA 10wt%
1000
EST DIPA 20wt%
500 EST DIPA 30wt%
EST DIPA 40wt%
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
CO2 loading (m ol CO2/ m ol DIPA)
5000
4500
4000
Heat Capacity, J/kg-K
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
EST DIPA 10wt%
1000
EST DIPA 20wt%
500 EST DIPA 30wt%
EST DIPA 40wt%
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
H2S loading (m ol H2S/m ol DIPA)
16 2 Physical Properties
5000
4500
4000
Heat Capacity, J/kg-K 3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
5000
4500
4000
Heat Capacity, J/kg-K
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
-20000
-60000
-80000
-100000
-10000
Integral Heat of Solution, J/mol
-20000
-30000
-40000
-50000
EST DIPA 10wt%
EST DIPA 20wt%
-60000
EST DIPA 30wt%
EST DIPA 40wt%
-70000
-80000
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
H2S loading (m ol H2S/m ol DIPA)
18 2 Physical Properties
0
-20000
-60000
-80000
-100000
-160000
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
CO2 loading (m ol CO2/ m ol DIPA)
-10000
Integral Heat of Solution, J/mol
-20000
-30000
-40000
-50000
-80000
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
H2S loading (m ol H2S/ m ol DIPA)
1.0E+03
1.0E+01
1.0E-02
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
CO2 loading (m ol CO2/ m ol DIPA)
1.0E+04
1.0E+03
Total pressure, kPa
1.0E+02
1.0E+00
0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
CO2 loading (m ol CO2/ m ol DIPA)
20 2 Physical Properties
0.06
EXP DIPA 10 wt%(96.2 kPa)
EXP DIPA 20 wt%(101.6 kPa)
0.05
EXP DIPA 25 wt%(101.5 kPa)
EXP DIPA 35 wt%(100.6 kPa)
0.04
CO 2 mole fraction
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
290 300 310 320 330 340 350 360
Tem perature, K
Figure 27. VLE of the DIPA-CO2-H2O system at around 100 kPa total pressure,
experimental data from from Dell’Era et al. (2010) [33]
1.0E+04
1.0E+03
H2 S partial pressure, kPa
1.0E+02
EXP 0.1H2S
1.0E+03
EXP 0.2 H2S
EXP 0.3 H2S
CO 2 partial pressure, kPa
EXP 0.4 H2S
1.0E+02
EXP 0.5 H2S
EXP 0.6 H2S
1.0E-01
0.01 0.1 1 10
CO2 loading (m ol CO2/ m ol DIPA)
1.0E+04
EXP 0.1H2S
EXP 0.2 H2S
EXP 0.3 H2S
1.0E+03
EXP 0.4 H2S
CO 2 partial pressure, kPa
1.0E+01
1.0E+00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
CO2 loading (m ol CO2/ m ol DIPA)
22 2 Physical Properties
1.0E+04
EXP 0.1CO2
1.0E+03
EXP 0.2 CO2
EXP 0.3 CO2
H2 S partial pressure, kPa
EXP 0.4 CO2
1.0E+02
EXP 0.5 CO2
EXP 0.6 CO2
EXP 0.7 CO2
1.0E+01
EXP 0.8 CO2
EXP 0.9 CO2
EXP 1CO2
1.0E+00
EXP 1.1CO2
EXP 1.2 CO2
1.0E-01
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
H2S loading (m ol H2S/ m ol DIPA)
1.0E+04
1.0E+00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
H2S loading (m ol H2S/ m ol DIPA)
1.0E-01
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
H2S loading (m ol H2S/ m ol DIPA)
1.0E+04
1.0E+03
CO 2 partial pressure, kPa
1.0E+02
EXP 313.15 K
1.0E+00
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
CO2 loading (m ol CO2/ m ol DIPA)
24 2 Physical Properties
1.0E+04
1.0E+03
1.0E+02
EXP 313.15 K
1.0E+01
EXP 373.15 K
1.0E+00
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2
H2S loading (m ol H2S/ m ol DIPA)
26 3 Reactions
4 Kinetic CO 2 OH HCO 3
5 Kinetic HCO 3 CO 2 OH
6 Kinetic DIPA CO 2 H 2 O DIPACOO - H 3 O
7 Kinetic DIPACOO - H 3 O DIPA CO 2 H 2 O
8 Equilibrium H 2 O H 2 S HS H 3 O
9 Equilibrium H 2 O HS S 2 H 3 O
The equilibrium constants for reactions 1-7 in Chemistry DIPA are calculated
from the standard Gibbs free energy change.
The power law expressions are used for the rate-controlled reactions
(reactions 4-7 in DIPA-REA):
E 1 1 N
r k T T0 exp xi i i
n a
(1)
R T T0 i 1
Where:
r = Rate of reaction;
k = Pre-exponential factor;
T = Absolute temperature;
T0 = Reference temperature;
n = Temperature exponent;
E = Activation energy;
R = Universal gas constant;
N = Number of components in the reaction;
xi = Mole fraction of component i;
γi = Activity coefficient of component i;
ai = The stoichiometric coefficient of component i in the reaction equation.
If T0 is not specified, the reduced power law expression is used:
E N
r kT n exp xi i i
a
(2)
RT i 1
In this work, the reduced expression is used. In equation (2), the factor n is
zero, and k and E are given in Table 3.
The kinetic parameters for reaction 4 are taken from the work of Pinsent et al.
(1956)[4], and the kinetic parameters for reaction 5 are calculated by using
the kinetic parameters of reaction 4 and the equilibrium constants of the
reversible reactions 4 and 5.The kinetic parameters for reaction 6 in Table 3
are derived from the work of Blauwhoff et al. (1985) [5]. The kinetic
parameters for reaction 7 are calculated by using the kinetic parameters of
reaction 6 and the equilibrium constants of the reversible reactions 6 and 7.
3 Reactions 27
Table 3. Parameters k and E in Equation (2)
Reaction No. k E , cal/mol
4 1.33E+17 13249
5 6.62E+16 25656
6 1.26E+13 9563.1
7 2.08E+25 18278
28 3 Reactions
4 Simulation Approach
Process simulation is not within the scope of current phase of this work so we
decided to use a single stage flash model to simulate the CO 2 and H2S
absorption by the mixed solvent sulfolane-DIPA-H2O.
Simulation Flowsheet – The absorber has been modeled with the following
simulation flowsheet in Aspen Plus, shown in Figure 37. CO2 and H2S in
stream GASIN are absorbed by the mixed solvent (40 wt% sulfolane + 40
wt% DIPA + 20 wt% H 2O) in stream LEANIN in a FLASH2 block.
4 Simulation Approach 29
Unit Operations - Major unit operations in this model have been represented
by Aspen Plus blocks as outlined in Table 4.
Streams - Feeds to the absorber are GASIN containing CO2 and H2S and
LEANIN containing aqueous sulfolane-DIPA solution. Feed conditions are
summarized in Table 5.
30 4 Simulation Approach
5 Simulation Results
The simulation was performed using Aspen Plus. Key simulation results are
presented in Table 6.
5 Simulation Results 31
6 Conclusions
32 6 Conclusions
References
Re fere nces 33
[13] F.Y. Jou, R.D. Deshmukh, F.D. Otto, A.E. Mather, “Solubility of H2S, CO2,
CH4, and C2H6 in Sulfolane at Elevated Pressures”, Fluid Phase Equilibria, 56,
313-324 (1990)
[14] O.R. Rivas, J.M. Prausnitz, “Sweetening of Sour Natural Gases by Mixed-
Solvent Absorption: Solubilities of Ethane, Carbon Dioxide, and Hydrogen
Sulfide in Mixtures of Physical and Chemical Solvents”, AIChE J., 6, 975-984
(1979)
[15] B.E. Roberts, A.E. Mather, “Solubility of H 2S and CO2 in Sulfolane”, Can.
J. Chem. Eng., 66, 519-520 (1988)
[16] F. Murrieta-Guevara, A. Romero-Martinez, A. Trejo, “Solubilities of
Carbon Dioxide and Hydrogen Sulfide in Propylene Carbonate, N-
methylpyrrolidone and Sulfolane”, Fluid Phase Equilibria, 44, 105-115 (1988)
[17] D.M. Kassim, H.A. Zainel, S.A. Al-Asaf, E.K. Talib, “The Temperature
Dependence of the Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Several Extraction
Solvents”, Fluid Phase Equilibria, 41, 287-294 (1988)
[18] A. Henni, J.J. Hromek, P. Tontiwachwuthikul, A. Chakma, “Volumetric
Properties and Viscosities for Aqueous Diisopropanolamine Solutions from
25 °C to 70 °C”, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 48, 1062-1067 (2003)
[19] L.-F. Chiu, H.-F. Liu, M.-H Li, “Heat Capacity of Alkanolamines by
Differential Scanning Calorimetry”, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 44, 631-636 (1999)
[20] L. Jannelli, A. Azzi, A. Lopez, S. Saiello, “Thermodynamic and Physical
Behavior of Binary Mixtures Involving Sulfolane. Excess Volumes and
Dielectric Constants of Sulfolane-Nitrobenzene Mixtures”, J. Chem. Eng. Data,
25, 77-79 (1980)
[21] J.G. Speight, Lange’s Handbook of Chemistry, 16th ED, McGraw-Hill,
New York (2005)
[22] E. Tommila, E. Lindell, M.L. Virtalaine, R. Laakso, “Densities, Viscosities,
Surface Tensions, Dielectric Constants, Vapor Pressures, Activities and Heats
of Mixing of Sulpholane -Water, Sulpholane-Methanol and Sulpholane-Ethanol
Mixtures”, Suomen Kemistilehti B, 42, 95-104 (1969)
[23] V.S. Kolosnitsyn, A.V. Popov, S.E. Mochalov, R.G. Akhmadeev,
“Dielectric Properties of Sulfones”, Elektrokhimiya, 27, 940 (1991)
[24] J.F. Casteel, P.G. Sears, “Dielectric Constants, Viscosities, and Related
Physical Properties of 10 Liquid Sulfoxides and Sulfones at Several
Temperatures”, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 19, 196-200 (1974)
[25] S.W. Brelvi, J.P. O’Connell, “Corresponding States Correlations for Liquid
Compressibility and Partial Molar Volumes of Gases at Infinite Dilution in
Liquids”, AIChE J., 18, 1239-1243 (1972)
[26] C.-C. Chen, H.I. Britt, J.F. Boston, L.B. Evans, “Local Composition Model
for Excess Gibbs Energy of Electrolyte Systems. Part I: Single Solvent, Single
Completely Dissociated Electrolyte Systems”, AIChE J., 28, 588-596 (1982)
[27] C. Dell’Era, P. Uusi-Kyyny, E.L. Rautama, M. Pakkanen, V. Alopaeus,
“Thermodynamics of Aqueous Solutions of Methyldiethanolamine and
Diisopropanolamine”, Fluid Phase Equilib., 299, 51-59 (2010)
34 References
[28] T.G. Zijlema, G.J. Witkamp, G.M. van Rosmalen, “Specific Heats and
Enthalpies of Mixing of Amine-H2O and Amine-H2O-NaCl Mixtures”, J. Chem.
Eng. Data, 44, 1335-1337 (1999)
[29] L.-F. Chiu, M.-H. Li, “Heat Capacity of Alkanolamine Aqueous Solutions”,
J. Chem. Eng. Data, 44, 1396-1401 (1999)
[30] R.L. Benoit, G. Choux, “Reactions in Sulfolane. III. Study of the
Interactions between Water and Sulfolane”, Can. J. Chem., 46, 3215-3219
(1968)
[31] S. Horstmann, K. Fischer, J. Gmehling, “Isothermal Vapor-Liquid
Equilibrium and Excess Enthalpy Data for the Binary Systems Water +
Sulfolane and Methanol + N- methyl-2-pyrrolidone”, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 49,
1499-1503 (2004)
[32] Y.-X. Yu, J.-G. Liu, G.-H. Gao, “Isobaric Vapor-Liquid Equilibria and
Excess Volumes for the Binary Mixtures Water + Sulfolane, Water +
Tetraethylene Glycol, and Benzene + Tetraethylene Glycol”, J. Chem. Eng.
Data, 45, 570-574 (2000)
[33] C. Dell’Era, P. Uusi-Kyyny, J.-P. Pokki, M. Pakkanen, V. Alopaeus,
“Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Aqueous Solutions of Diisopropanolamine and
Methyldiethanolamine”, Fluid Phase Equilibria, 293, 101-109 (2010)
[34] V.V. Goncharov, E.S. Verstakov, Yu.M. Kessler, “Dielectric and Viscous
Properties of Water - Tetramethylene Sulfone Mixtures”, Zh. Strukt. Khim., 24,
64-68 (1983)
[35] A. D'Aprano, I.D. Donato, “Ionic Association in High Dielectric Constant
Solvents. Conductance of Potassium Chlorate in Sulpholane - Water Mixtures
at 25 °C”, Gazz. Chim. Ital., 102, 923-928 (1972)
[36] A. D'Aprano, A. Capalbi, M. Battistini, “Effect of Solvent Structure of the
Transport and Thermodynamic Properties of Electrolyte Solutions.
Conductance of Potassium Nitrate and Sodium Bromide in Water +
Sulpholane Mixtures at 25 °C”, J. Electroanal. Chem., 353, 121-130 (1993)
[37] S.D. Klein, “Electrolytic Conductance in Dipolar Aprotic and Mixed
Solvent Systems”, Dissertation, Gainesville, Florida (1980)
[38] R.J. Little, G.F. Versteeg, W.P.M. van Swaaij, “Solubility and Diffusivity
Data for the Absorption of COS, CO2, and N2O in Amine Solutions”, J. Chem.
Eng. Data, 37, 49-55 (1992)
[39] A.K. Srivastava, A.R. Desai, “Conductance Behavior of Some Potassium
and Tetraalkylammonium Salts in Sulfolane + Water”, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 37,
322-327 (1992)
[40] A. Sacco, G. Petrella, M. Castagnolo, “The Conductance of the Alkali
Halides. II. Potassium Chloride in Sulfolane - Water Mixtures at 35 °C”, Z.
Naturforsch. Sec. A, 26, 1306-1308 (1971)
[41] G. Petrella, M. Castagnolo, A. Sacco, L. Lasalandra, “The Conductance of
the Alkali Halides. III. Lithium Chloride in Sulfolane - Water Mixtures at
35 °C”, Z. Naturforsch. Sec. A, 27, 1345-1349 (1972)
[42] G. Petrella, M. Petrella, “Walden Product, Ion-Solvent Interactions, and
Solvent Structure in Water-Rich Mixtures. Ionic Conductances in Water -
Re fere nces 35
Sulfolane, Water - Acetonitrile, and Water – Dimethyl Sulfoxide”, Electrochim.
Acta, 27, 1733-1739 (1982)
[43] A. D'Aprano, A. Capalbi, M.G. Bonicelli, G.F. Ceccaroni, “Volumes,
Dilution Enthalpies and Dielectric Polarization of Water - Sulpholane Mixtures
at Different Temperatures”, Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem., 96, 1854-1859
(1992)
[44] O. Landauer, G. Costeanu, C. Mateescu, “Viscosity of Mixed Systems
Sulfolane - Water, Sulfolane - Dioxane, Monoethylene Glycol - Dioxane, and
Diethylene Glycol – Dioxane”, Rev. Roum. Chim., 24, 1021-1026 (1979)
[45] J.S. Pac, I.N. Maksimova, L.V. Glushenko, “Viscosity of Alkali Salt
Solutions and Comparative Calculation Method”, J. Appl. Chem. USSR, 57,
846 (1984)
[46] Z. Palaty, “Viscosity of diluted aqueous K 2CO3/KHCO3 solutions”, Collect.
Czech. Chem. Commun., 57, 1879 (1992)
[47] E. B. Rinker, A. T. Colussi, N. L. Mcknight, O. C. Sandall, “Effect of
Hydrogen Sulfide Loading on the Density and Viscosity of Aqueous Solutions
of Methyldiethanolamine”, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 45, 254-256 (2000)
[48] E.S. Hamborg, G.F. Versteeg, “Dissociation Constants and
Thermodynamic Properties of Amines and Alkanolamines from (293 to 353)
K”, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 54, 1318-1328 (2009)
[49] C.M. Criss, J.W. Cobble, “The Thermodynamic Properties of High
Temperature Aqueous Solutions. V. The Calculation of Ionic Heat Capacities
up to 200º. Entropies and Heat Capacities above 200º”, J. Amer. Chem. Soc.,
86, 5390-5393 (1964)
[50] D.D. Wagman, W.H. Evans, V.B. Parker, R.H. Schumm, I. Halow, S.M.
Bailey, K.L. Churney, R.L. Nuttall, “The NBS Tables of Chemical
Thermodynamic Properties – Selected Values for Inorganic and C1 and C2
Organic Substances in SI Unites”, Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference
Data, 11, Supplement No. 2 (1982)
36 References