Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
SUSAN COBB, )
PLAINTIFF, )
)
V. )
)
ALABAMA DEMOCRATIC PARTY; )
NANCY WORLEY, individually, )
and in her capacity as Chairman of the )
ALABAMA DEMOCRATIC PARTY, )
and the State Democratic Executive )
Committee; and the EXECUTIVE BOARD )
OF THE STATE DEMOCRATIC )
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, )
DEFENDANTS. )
undersigned counsel, and brings the following action for declaratory and injunctive relief:
PARTIES
1. Plaintiff Susan Cobb (“Cobb”), is over the age of 19 and is a resident citizen of
Democratic Party and the State Democratic Executive Committee and upon information and
Alabama (“the Board”), is a principal governing body of the Alabama Democratic Party, consists
of members from throughout the state, and operates in all counties in Alabama, including Marion
County, Alabama.
FACTS
5. Susan Cobb was duly elected the chairperson of the Marion County Democratic
6. Said election occurred following a period of long stagnation in the Marion County
7. Cobb, along with others, helped reinvigorate the Marion County Democratic
Executive Committee;
8. Cobb never received guidance, nor instruction on how these elections were to be
held, nor how they were to be reported to the Alabama Democratic Party;
9. Nevertheless, the Alabama Democratic Party placed Cobb’s name on its website
10. On June 5, 2018, while suffering from a debilitating illness, Cobb received a call
from Worley asking where the returns from the primary election were. Cobb had never been
instructed by the Party nor Worley, it was her job to communicate to the Party the results of the
primary races. Cobb rightfully asserted to Worley that the probate judge was certifying the
returns to the Secretary of State, and as such, she was not aware she had to personally certify the
Nonetheless, Cobb quickly made arrangements for another member of the Marion County
Democratic Executive Committee to obtain the results from the Marion County probate judge
required was not in the e-mail to let Cobb or the Marion County Executive Committee know.
12. On August 11, 2018, elections for the Chairperson of the Alabama Democratic
Party were held. Cobb vigorously opposed Worley’s re-election, and instead backed Worley’s
challenger. In spite of this, Worley was re-elected as chairperson of the Alabama Democratic
Party.
13. In the week following the election, Cobb’s name was removed from the Alabama
Committee.
14. When Cobb contacted Worley to inquire why her name was removed, Worley
claimed it was done at Worley’s discretion because Cobb had failed to properly certify the
election returns;
15. Worley purportedly plans to hold a re-organization meeting, claiming that the
16. Nothing within the Alabama Democratic Party bylaws allows such an ouster, nor
17. This action is brought pursuant to the Alabama Uniform Declaratory Judgment
Act, Ala. Code § 6-6-220, et. seq., and Rule 57 of the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure.
18. A justiciable controversy exists between the parties which the Court must decide.
19. The actions by Worley in removing Cobb and seeking to hold a new set of
elections for Marion County Democratic Executive Committee exceeds the discretion of
20. The actions by Worley in removing Cobb and seeking to hold a new set of
elections for Marion County Democratic Executive Committee are not allowed, nor provided for
21. The actions and standards instituted by Worley violate Cobb’s right to due
process because Worley, the Party, and the Board have failed to provide Cobb with adequate
22. The actions and standards being applied to Cobb are being applied in a capricious,
arbitrary, and pretextual manner, with no rational basis for said application.
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff prays this Court will take jurisdiction of this case and
(1) Declare that Cobb is the rightful and duly elected chairperson of the Marion
(3) Enter such orders, judgments, and decrees as may be necessary and propert to
give effect to the rights, duties, and liabilities of the parties as declared by the Court;
(4) Enter all other such relief as may be just and proper, including, but not limited to
attorney’s fees.
500, et. seq., and Rule 65 of the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure.
24. Plaintiff adopts all of the above allegations as if set out herein. .
25. Without injunctive relief, the Plaintiff will suffer irreparable harm to-wit: she will
26. The Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law for the harm she has suffered or that
will be suffered.
27. The Plaintiff has at least a reasonable chance of success on the ultimate merits in
28. Any hardship imposed upon the Defendants by and through injunctive relief
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff prays this Court will take jurisdiction of this case and prior
(1) Issue a preliminary injunction enjoining the Defendants from holding any
elections for the Marion County Democratic Executive Committee until such time as the court
(2) Issue a permanent injunction upon final hearing preventing Defendants from
removing any duly elected member of the Marion County Democratic Executive Committee,
who was elected in the most recent election of that body, who still resides in said district, and