Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
of
2-T RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
Q 16
B1 B1
2-T
Q 16 2-T
Q 16
2-T
Q 16 2-T
Q 16 2-T
Q 16
B1 B1
SEPTEMBER 2017
Submitted by:
LUMANTI
Support for shelter
Table of Contents
1. BACKGROUND
2. INTRODUCTION
3. ASSUMPTION OF DATA
3.2 LOADS
LIVE LOAD
DEAD LOAD
SESMIC LOAD
4. DESIGN
5. CONCLUSION
1. BACKGROUND
Nepal lies in the Vth zone which is at high risk of vulnerability. So, there is high demand
for the earthquake resistant design of the building for saving from these devastating
disasters.
Earthquake is shaking of the earth surface caused by the waves originated underneath and
on the surface of earth.
Structural design with the sound knowledge of structural engineering determines the sizes
of members like beam, column, rebar arrangements and others. These structures are
subjected to various loads like concentrated loads, uniformly distributed loads, uniformly
varying loads, random loads, internal or earthquake load and dynamic forces. The
structure transfers its load to the support and ultimately to the ground. While transferring
the loads acting on the structures, the members of the structures are subjected to internal
forces like axial force, shear force, bending and torsion moments. Structural analysis
deals with analyzing these internal forces in the members of the structures.
According to IS893-2002, the effects of earthquake is pre-dominant than the wind load.
So, the building is analyzed for earthquake as lateral load.
2. Introduction
This report deals with the methodology of the structural analysis and design of residential
building for the reconstruction of masonry building with eccentric footing.
The basic aim of the structural design is to build a structure, which is safe, fulfilling the
intended purpose during its life, economic in initial and maintenance cost, durable and also
maintain a good aesthetic appearance. The construction of any building consists of three
phases: a) Design b) Drawing with proper detailing and c) construction as per drawing and
details. The design of structure consists of two parts :
At first the preliminary size of various member for specific structure are fixed and the
analysis is carried out. With the result obtained from analysis, necessary design is carried out.
After the completion of the design, drawings are prepared with all necessary details. The
presentation of the design calculation and drawing should be clear. However, it would not be
economically feasible to design the building so as to ensure that they remain elastic and
damage free because the occurrence of maximum earthquakes low say one in 100 years. Thus
it is reliable to the design the ductile structure and no to design damage free structure but
non-collapsible structure for minimum destruction in lives and properties. The design should
ensure the structure against stability, strength and serviceability with acceptable levels of
seismic safety.
The structure is a load bearing reinforced masonry system. Masonry unit used is burnt clay
bricks. A construction system where steel reinforcement is embedded in the mortar joints of
masonry or placed in holes and after filled with concrete or grout is called reinforced masonry.
3.2 LOADS
DEAD LOAD
Dead Load on the structure comprise the self weight of the member; weight of
the finishes and partition walls. These are usually dependent upon the
constructional features and have to be assumed in order to design various
structural concrete members. The loads on the beams due to the slabs were
calculated according to clause 23.5 of IS 456-2000. The wall is taken for
thickness of either 230mm or 350mm as per architectural drawing and suitable
reduction is made for window and door opening. As the software, we have
used, generates the self weight of the structural member by itself, we have not
calculated the self weight.
LIVE LOAD
The Live Load for the building is extracted from IS code 875 part II-1987 for
different occupancies.
I. 1.5 KN/m2 for accessed terrace and 1 KN/m2 for non accessed terrace.
II. 2.0 KNm2 for rooms
SESMIC LOAD
Assessment of Lateral Loads
It is the load acting horizontally in accordance with storey masses of building.
Seismic weight is the total dead load plus appropriate amount of specified
imposed load. While computing the seismic load weight of each floor, the
weight of columns and walls in any storey shall be equally distributed to the
floors above and below the storey. The seismic weight of the whole building
is the sum of the seismic weights of all floors. It has been calculated according
to IS: 1893-(Part I)-2002.
IS: 1893 - (Part I) - 2002 states that for the calculation of the design seismic
forces of the structure the imposed load on roof need not be considered.
The wind load and earthquake loads are assumed not to act simultaneously. A
building is design for the worst condition of two loads. In our case, earthquake
forces govern Lateral load. Thus, assignment of lateral load is carried out
according to IS: 1893-(Part I)-2002. There are basically three methods to
determine the earthquake force in the building:
a. Seismic Coefficient Method or Static Method
b. Response Spectrum Method or Modal Analysis or Spectral
Acceleration Method or Dynamic Method
c. Time History Method
VB = Ah.W
Z I Sa I
Ah = (2) x (R) x( g ) Where, (R) ≤ 1
Where,
Ah = Horizontal seismic coefficient value
Z = Zone factor for max considered earthquake condition given in IS 1893
(part I) : 2002 clause 6.4.2, table 2
R = Response reduction factor given in IS1893 (part I):2002 clause 6.4.2,
table 7
Sa
= Spectral acceleration depending upon the period of vibration and
g
damping as given in IS: 1893 (part I): 2002 clause 6.4.2, figure 2
I = Post-disaster importance factor depending on the life and function of
structure, historical value or economic importance as IS 1893 (part I):2002,
table 6
W = Seismic weight which include
a. Floor wise dead load consisting of weight of floor, beams, parapet,
fixed permanent equipment and half the wall and columns etc. above
and below.
b. Reduce live load on the building (25% of live load for LL≤ 3.0 KN/m2
and 50% of LL for LL> 3.0 KN/m2)
T = Estimated natural or fundamental period of vibration building in second
= 0.09 x( H/D)0.5
H = Total height of building in m in a direction perpendicular to the
earthquake force
Ds = Dimension of building in m in a direction parallel to the applied
earthquake force
After calculating the base shear VB the distribution of earthquake force on
different floor is determined as follows;
Wh
Qi = ∑ Wi hi2 x VB
i i
LOAD COMBINATION
Different load cases and load combination cases as per IS 875 are considered
to obtain most critical element stresses in structure in the course of analysis.
There are altogether four load cases considered for the structural analysis are
mentioned as below:
a. Dead Load (DL)
b. Live Load (LL)
c. Earthquake load in x-direction (EQx)
d. Earthquake load in x-direction (EQx)
The following load combinations are adopted:
4. DESIGN
Columns are designed with the help of ETABS. Sizes and reinforcement are provided
as instructed by ETABS checking it with the limit provided by IS 456:2000. Grade of
concrete and steel are M20 and Fe500 with clear cover 25mm.
Bands at various levels were determined after the stress check using ETABS.
All the structural members are modeled as they are to be constructed on site. Then are
checked for permissible stress on the sections. And where stress exceeds the
permissible value (on the critical sections), they are reinforced by filling with
reinforced grouts and different bands (roof band, lintel, sills).
The project has mainly been directed towards the structural analysis and design part
only. Nevertheless the attempts had been made in architectural planning and for the
presentation of the analysis and design result in tabular form with necessary drawings
and details. The fundamental principle and methodology applied while analyzing and
designing the structure is universally valid for any type of the framed structural
buildings.
Design of beam, column and foundation was done with the help of ETABS 2016 and
IS codes for ductile design. After design of all members structural drawing is drawn
as per design and other detailing rule. Hence safe, stable and economical seismic
design of the building is done.
GENERAL INTRODUCTION :
This is the seismic analysis and design of two storey brick masonry building in ETABS. The building is
located in high seismic zone of Nepal and is used as an ordinary residential building. Static Linear
analysis of the building is done using seismic coefficient method. ETABS analysis output data are used to
verify the results and also for the design of structural elements.
1.1 GENERAL
9. Earthquake Zone V
Unit Weights :
Live Loads
Concrete
Brick masonry
Steel Rebar
fc = fb*ks*ka*kp
Where
Compressive Stress S22 demand in load bearing brick masonry due to site specific earthquake loading is
well within permissible value except in very small locations of stress concentration at corners and places
where bands and rebar are needed.
fs = 0.1+ fv /6
fv = 0.138 N/mm2
• ft = 0.05 (For M2 mortar for bending in vertical direction where tension developed is normal to bed joint)
• ft = 0.1 (For M2 mortar for bending in longitudinal direction where tension developed is parallel to bed
joint, provided crushing strength of masonry units is not less than 7.5 N/mm2).
The design horizontal seismic force coefficient, Cd for seismic coefficient method is taken as
Cd = CZIK
Where,
Tx = (0.09 X H) / (D^0.5)
= (0.09 * 8.52)/(9.347^0.5)
= (0.09 * 8.52)/(4.851^0.5)
Cd = CZIK
Using IS Code
Where,
Z = 0.36 (Zone V)
Sa/g = 2.5
R = 3.0 (For Load bearing masonry wall buildings reinforced with horizontal RC
The tensile and compressive stresses that are induced due to various load patterns and their combinations
were analysed using the software from which maximum stresses for various sections were taken into
account for the manual design.
ap=1
Rp=2.5
x= 8.53 m
h = 8.53 m
z = 0.36
Ip = 1
Fp = 0.1478*Wp
t = 290 mm
Vertical load at mid height between lintel and sill level = 221.28 kN
z = 20416666.67 mm3
M/z = 0.0392
= 0.9 m
Adopt 1 m depth of foundation.
The footings are so designed and proportioned that the C.G. of the superimposed load coincides with
the C.G. of the base area, so that the footing is subjected to concentric loading, resulting in uniform
bearing pressure. However, in some cases, it may not be possible to do so. For example, if the wall
(or column) under construction is near some other property, it will not be possible to spread the
footing to both the sides of the wall.
Total load with footing weight per unit length = 81.21 kN/m
The magnitude of q1 should not exceed the safe bearing pressure for the soil. Also in order that the
footing may remain in contact with soil, q2 should be positive (i.e. no tension should be developed).
In the extreme case, q2 = 0, when e = B/6. This gives the maximum value of eccentricity. If e is
greater than B/6 tension will be developed, in which case, the end B of the footing will have loose
contact with the soil.
Hence,
q1 = 147.02 kN/m2
q2 = -61.76 kN/m2
Presence of tension causes upliftment in foundation. Provide concrete footing with reinforcement.
Bending Moment = wl2/2 = 177.749 kNm
Lets adopt overall depth as 300 mm and effective depth of footing = 250 mm.
BM = 0.87fy*A(d- fyA/fck*b)
:. A = 2058.02 mm2
At distance of 250mm,
Shear strength of M20 concrete ( Tc) =0.6 N/mm2 > 0.414 (OK)
STITCH DESIGN
Fp = 26.345 kN
Analytical data
Design Moment(Mua) 17 kNm
Beam width(b) 350 mm
k=xumax/d=εcu/(εcu+εsu) 0.456
Rulim=0.36fckxumax/d*(1-0.416xumax/d) 2.66
Mulim=0.36fckxumax/d*(1-0.416xumax/d)*bd2 63.43 kNm
Beam depth(d) 134.83 mm
Adopt d 300 mm
Cover 20 mm
effective cover d' 38 mm
Design
Using,
Mu=0.87fy* Ast *(d- fy *Ast / fck *b ), Ast = 156 mm2
Astmin=0.36 fckxubd/0.87fy 155 mm2
plim=Ast/bd 0.171 %
Provide 2-12mm dia bars as tension rebar.
Reinforcement area 0 mm2
Ac 226mm2
Provide 2-12 mm dia bars as compression rebar.
Area provided 226 mm2
Steel percent provided 0.248 %
Shear reinforcement
Shear force 78.1 kN
Area of shear reinforcement 101 mm2
Geometry Data
Length along shorter direction (Lx) 4.496 m
Length along longer direction (Ly) 4.5 m
Panel Type Three edges discontinuous and one
long edge continuous
Criteria for Depth User-Defined Depth
User Defined Depth 0.127
Material Data
Grade of Concrete M20
Grade of Steel Fe500
Unit weight of concrete 25 kN/m3
Loads
Superimposed dead load 1.75 kN/m2
Live load 2 kN/m2
Slab dead load 3.18 kN/m2
Reinforcement Data
Bar size along shorter dir.(mm) 8
Bar size along longer dir.(mm) 8
Clear Cover 15 mm
Shear Consideration Increase Steel Percentage
Steel % along X-dirn. at top 0.12
Steel % along Y-dirn. at top 0.12
Design Data
Calculation Of Reinforcement
Factored Moment at ,
Shear stress developed at shorter span, tcx,dev= Vux/ (b* dx) = 0.179 MPa
Shear stress developed at longer span, tcy,dev= Vuy/ (b*dy) = 0.179 MPa
Permissble shear stress at the section along Y-axis, tcx = 0.37 MPa >tcx,dev (ok)
Permissble shear stress at the section along X-axis, tcy = 0.37 MPa> tcy,dev (ok)
Modification factor =2
TABLE: Story
Drifts
Load
Story Combo Direction Drift Label X Y Z
m m m
Story4 EQX X 1.067E-07 35 3.0988 4.4958 9.5314
Story4 EQX Y 7.733E-08 3 0 8.9916 9.5314
Story4 EQY Y 1.885E-07 11 2.1844 4.4958 9.5314
Story3 EQX X 0.000001 39 0 -0.9144 8.5314
Story3 EQY Y 0.000001 11 2.1844 4.4958 8.5314
Story2 EQX X 0.000001 10 3.7846 4.4958 5.6876
Story2 EQY Y 0.000000232 26 2.1844 8.9916 5.6876
Story1 EQX X 0.000001 10 3.7846 4.4958 2.8438
Story1 EQY Y 2.001E-07 26 2.1844 8.9916 2.8438