Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
To cite this article: (1964) Air Pollution Control in Connection with DDT Production, Journal of the
Air Pollution Control Association, 14:3, 94-95, DOI: 10.1080/00022470.1964.10468253
In the vanguard of insecticides ing in the work area and this, of course,
since the end of World War II, DDT This report, published as Informa- adds to the problem of condensing the
production rose from 50 million pounds tive Report No. 6 of the Air Pollution
Control Association's TI-2 Chemical gases escaping from the reactors. Good
in 1947 to over 100 million pounds Committee, began to move through quantitative data are not available on
in 1951.* In 1959 there were seven the 14 step approval procedure, as the amount of the gases given off. It
manufacturers producing 157 million outlined in the March 1963 Journal, might be in the order of 1% of the
pounds, f in addition to the producers on January 10, 1963. Comments
made by members of the Technical weight of the DDT produced. Prob-
of DDT, there were, in 1960, 41 com- Council were considered in the ably 95% of this can be recovered with
panies who "formulated" bulk DDT preparation of the final report. It is a water scrubbing system.
for retailing.** now published as representing the In the washing and steaming step,
"best thinking of the Association."
It is an extremely timely and informa- by scrubbing the gases with cool,
The Process tive report. alkaline water, any further HC1, SO2,
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroeth- organic related compounds or mono-
ane) is made from chloral, monochlor- chlorbenzene coming off from this phase
benzene and sulphuric acid. The The second step is the separation of of the operation can largely be con-
chemical equation representing this the liquid acid or monochlor phase from densed. Again, as a rough estimate,
reaction is: the DDT. The DDT is then washed without counting excess monochlor
H2SOi with hot water and dilute soda ash solu- added as diluent, any gas driven off in
CCI3CHO + 2C6HEC1 tions to remove excess acidity. The this step would be in the order of one per-
iCl)2 + H2O aqueous washes are removed by syphon- cent of the total DDT production.
ing. And, as from the reactor, about 95%
Some producers make either their of this gas can be condensed with an
own monochlorbenzene, chloral, or In the third step, the DDT mixture
is blown with live steam, under vacuum, ordinary scrubbing device.
sulphuric acid or a combination of these. Any other wastes originating in the
Others, in turn, go a step further and to remove residual monochlorbenzene.
The DDT is then dried by an air sparger process would be insignificant, certainly
manufacture the chlorine to produce the less than V10 of one percent of the fin-
monochlorbenzene or chloral. This while remaining under vacuum is a
closed, steam-jacketed vessel. The ished product. These would come from
report will deal only with the DDT reac- a decomposition of the DDT. These
tion itself and not with the production molten DDT is then usually cooled on
a continuousflakingbelt. products are easily condensed.
of chloral, monochlorbenzene, chlorine The gases leaving the washers de-
or sulphuric acid. A block diagram of the manufacturing
process and pertinent data on the ma- scribed above have no distinguishable
The manufacturing process is a three- odor a few j^ards away from their release
step process. The first step consists terials associated with the process are
attached. into the atmosphere.
of the reaction of the monochlorbenzene
and chloral in the presence of 100% Storage—Unloading oleum with air
Air Pollution Aspects or' venting oleum tanks may give rise
sulphuric acid. Oleum is added during
the course of the reaction to take up Process—The reaction process itself to occasional emission of SO3 vapors.
water of reaction as it is formed and gives rise to a certain amount of fumes. The use of a closed systemwill minimize
excess monochlorbenzene or sulphuric The fumes are, primarily, the HC1 these losses.
acid is used as a liquid reaction medium. from the chloral, some low boiling im- Vents from chloral storage tanks can
Refrigeration is applied to control the purities in the chloral which are carried also give rise to some disagreeable
temperature at around 50 °F during the off with the HC1 and possibly some SO2 odors. Chloral, ordinarily, contains
process. from the decomposition of sulphuric one to two percent of HC1, one to two
acid. For the most part, these fumes percent water, 95% chloral, one to two
are condensable with water and a good percent of miscellaneous related or-
water scrub in a packed tower, or ganic chlorinated compound. If found
* Industrial Chemicals—Faith, Keyes, equivalent gas-liquid contactor, will necessary, these chloral tanks could
Clark—1957 Edition. clean the air. Ordinarily, it is desirable be vented via the process vent scrubbing
t U. S. Tariff Report. to keep a slight vacuum on the reaction system.
** 1960 Buyers Directory Issue of Oil,
Paint, and Drug Reporter. vessels to keep the acid gases from escap- Monochlorbenzene storage tanks or-
Chloral
ROY F. WESTON, INC.
Air To Vacuum Pump
Environmental Science
and Engineering Consultants
Water—Sewage—Refuse
Industrial Wastes
Stream—Air Pollution
Industrial Hygiene
Community Planning
Surveys—Research—Development-
Process Engineering—Plans and
Specifications Operation Supervision—
Analyses—Evaluations and Reports
Treatment
Bags
NEWTOWN SQUARE,
PENNSYLVANIA
DDT MANUFACTURE