EMS Engineering Science Journal

Study Article

Data Mining of Social Media Statistical Techniques for

Analyzing Student’s Problems in Universities

Pridhivi Raj Kandula1,*

1
Business Analytics and Project Management, University of Connecticut, USA

*
Corresponding author : Mr. Pridhivi Raj Kan-
dula, Business Analytics and Project Manage-
ment, University of Connecticut, Unit: UCo-
nn-Hartford, 100 Constitution Plaza Hartford,
CT 06103, USA ,Tel: +1(860) 728-2451,Email:
msbapm@business.uconn.edu
Received: 05-03-2018
Accepted: 26-03-2018
Published: 31-03-2018
Copyright: © 2018 Pridhivi Raj Kandula
Abstract
Online networking permits the creation and associations of client made substance.
Social medium spots incorporate Facebook, Twitter and so on. Understudy's easy go-
ing talk via web-based networking media centered into their instructive experience,
mentality, and stress over the learning method. Data from such un-instrumented
situations can exhibit important information to report understudy issue. Inspect-
ing information from such a social media is testing undertaking. The issue of under
study's encounters uncovers from web-based social networking sited require human
investigation or Interaction. It focuses on building understudy's Twitter presents on
known issue and inconveniences in their instructive practices. This paper proposes
a work process to assemble both subjective examination and huge scale information
mining plan. Initial an example is taken from understudy and afterward subjective
examination led on that example which is related to building understudy's instructive
life. So just tweets identified with designing understudy is gathered. It is discovered
that building understudies experience issues, for example, substantial learning load,
absence of social gathering, and rest insufficiency. In view of this result, a multi-name
arrangement calculation that is Naive Bayes Multi-Name Classifier calculation is con-
nected to sort tweets displaying understudy's issues. At that point choice tee calcu-
lation is connected to make more precise outcome it will perform separating. The
calculation readies an identifier of understudy issues. This investigation exhibits a
strategy and result that show how easygoing web-based social networking informa-
tion can introduce understanding into understudy's occurrence.

Keywords: Social Networking; Web-Text Analysis; Education; Social Network Anal-

ysis; Computer and Education, Data Mining

Introduction
The procedure of gathering of information, looking and ex- to bottom and wonderful comprehension of understudies’
amining a gigantic measure of information in a database, in encounters particularly in their learning-related issues and
order to discover examples or connections is the utilization troubles. To decide in a tweet, what are the understudy’s con-
of information mining to recognize extortion. In fact, infor- cern, is a more convoluted errand than to decide the feeling of
mation mining is the procedure to discover connections or a tweet notwithstanding for a human judge. Along these lines,
examples among many fields in extensive social databases. this investigation requires a subjective examination, and is
Robotized forecast of floats and practices: Mining mechaniz- difficult to do in a completely unendorsed way. Estimation ex-
es the way toward seeking prescient data in an expansive da- amination is, hence, not pertinent to this investigation. In this
tabase [1]. Inquiries that regularly require broad hands-on investigation, we will actualize a multi-name grouping model
investigation would now be able to be effortlessly replied where we enable one tweet to fall into various classifications
from the information. An average case of a prognostic issue is in the meantime. Our work broadens the extent of informa-
focused on advertising. Our motivation is to accomplish top tion driven methodologies in instruction, for example, learn-
Cite this article: Pridhivi Raj Kandula. Data Mining of Social Media Statistical Techniques for Analyzing Student’s Problems in Universities.
EMS Eng Sci j 2018, 2(1):009.
ing investigation and instructive information mining. Gener-
ally, instructive analysts are utilizing techniques, for example,
overviews, interviews, center gatherings, classroom exercis-
es to gather information identified with understudies’ learn-
ing encounters. These techniques are normally exceptionally
tedious, so can’t be cloned or rehashed with high recurrence.
The exploration objective of this learning is:
 To demonstrate a work of online networking data
sense-production for instructive reasons, joining both
subjective examination and extensive scale information
mining strategies.
 To find designing understudy’s easygoing exchang-
es on Twitter, with a specific end goal to knows the issue
coming into their life. This Study wants to center around
building understudy’s remarks posted on Twitter about
their issues in composition life on the grounds that:
1. Designing schools and branch have for some time been
worried with understudy business and conservation themes.
Designing graduates contain a noteworthy piece of the coun-
try’s potential work compel and directly affect the country’s
money related development [2].
2. In view of comprehension of understudies trouble leaders
can make more proficient conclusions on legitimate obstruc-
tion that can help understudies to overcome snags in training
and help the understudy to take care of the issue.
3. Twitter is an all-around loved online networking website.
Its substance is as often as possible open and extremely short
that is close to 140 characters for each tweet. Twitter offer
free APIs that is utilized to stream information and enables
designers to expand upon and broaden their applications in
new and imaginative ways. Access Data from Twitter give de-
signers low idleness access to Twitter’s worldwide stream of
Tweet information. To develop an information mining plan or
are associated with investigation look into, the Streaming API
is most appropriate for such things. Twitter realities are in a
reasonable arrangement for examination. Twitter’s terms of
apply for the information are generally tolerant. It is by and
large acknowledged that tweets are open and accessible to
anyone; henceforth they allow entrée to any record with no
compelling reason to ask for authorize.
Social Networks Analysis
Social Networks Analysis (SNA), or basic examination, goes
for considering connections between people, rather than sin-
gular characteristics or properties. An interpersonal organi-
zation is thought to be a gathering of individuals, an associa-
tion or social people who are associated by social connections
like companionship, agreeable relations, or enlightening
trade. Distinctive DM strategies have been utilized to mine in-
formal communities in instructive conditions, yet synergistic
arranging is the most well-known. Synergistic separating or
social sifting is a strategy for making programmed expecta-
tions about the interests of a client by gathering taste inclina-
tions from numerous clients.
Cite this article: Pridhivi Raj Kandula. Data Mining of Social Media Statistical Techniques for Analyzing Student’s Problems in Universities.
EMS Eng Sci j 2018, 2(1):009.
Qualitative Investigation
Qualitative investigation is a method of examination utilized
in numerous differing scholarly control, by convention in the
sociologies, yet in addition in statistical surveying and further
settings. Subjective analysts intend to accumulate an inside
and out comprehension of human activities and the reasons
that oversee such conduct. The subjective strategy analyzes
the why and how of basic leadership, not exactly what, where,
when. Subsequently, minor however engaged examples are
frequently utilized than tremendous examples. Subjective
systems make data just on the specific cases contemplated,
and any broader terminations are just proposals. Quantita-
tive strategies would then be able to be utilized to search for
trial bolster for such research hypotheses.
Related Work
The hypothetical reason for the estimation of casual informa-
tion on the web can be drawn from Goffman’s hypothesis of
social execution [3]. Goffman’s hypothesis of social execution
is broadly used to give detail of intervened cooperation on the
web today [4]. One of the most key parts of this hypothesis is
the thought of front-arrange and back-phase of individuals’
social exhibitions. Contrasted and the front stage, the un-
winding air of back-arrange typically acclaims more uncon-
strained activities. For understudies, contrasted with formal
classroom settings, online networking is relative casual and
unwinding back-arrange. At the point when understudies
post content via web-based networking media locales, they
as a rule post what they think and feel right then and there.
In this sense, the information gathered from online discus-
sion might be more bona fide and unfiltered than reactions to
formal research prompts. Numerous investigations demon-
strate that web-based social networking clients may deliber-
ately deal with their online character to “look better “than, in
actuality, [5,6] .Other examinations demonstrate that there is
shortage of mindfulness about overseeing on the web char-
acter among understudies [7], and that youngsters typical-
ly view web-based social networking as their own space to
hang out with peers outside seeing guardians and instructors
[8]. Understudies’ online discussions uncover parts of their
encounters that are not effectively found in formal classroom
settings, along these lines are typically not archived in in-
structive writing. The wealth of online networking informa-
tion gives openings yet additionally displays methodological
challenges for dissecting huge scale casual printed informa-
tion. The following area audits famous strategies utilized for
breaking down Twitter information. Gaffney [9] examina-
tions tweets with hashtag #iranElection utilizing histograms,
client systems, and frequencies of best watchwords to gauge
online activism. Comparative examinations have been led in
different fields including social insurance [6], showcasing [5],
and sports [3]. These investigations have more accentuation
on factual models and calculations. They cover an exten-
sive variety of subject’s fame expectation, occasion location,
theme revelation and tweet order. Conclusion investigation
is exceptionally helpful for mining client assessments on
items or organizations through their surveys or online posts.
It finds wide reception in advertising and client relationship
2/7
administration (CRM).
Different examinations demonstrate that there is an absence
of mindfulness about overseeing on the web character among
understudies, and that youngsters for the most part view web-
based social networking as their own space to hang out with
peers outside seeing guardians and instructors. Understudy’s
online discussions uncover parts of their encounters that are
not effectively found in formal classroom settings, in this way
are normally not archived in instructive writing. The follow-
ing are surveys of concentrates on Twitter from the fields of
information mining, machine learning, and regular dialect
preparing. These investigations have more accentuation on
measurable models and calculations. They cover an extensive
variety of themes prevalence forecast, occasion recognition,
point disclosure and tweet grouping. Among these subjects,
tweet grouping is most applicable to this examination. Well
known arrangement calculations incorporate Naïve Bayes,
Decision Tree, Logistic Regression, Maximum Entropy, Boost-
ing, and Support Vector Machines (SVM).
Most existing examinations found on tweet grouping are ei-
ther twofold order on pertinent and unimportant substance,
or multi-class characterization on non-specific classes, for ex-
ample, news, occasions, feelings, arrangements, and private
messages. Supposition examination is another exceptionally
well known three-class arrangement on positive, negative,
or unbiased feelings/sentiments. Assessment examination is
exceptionally helpful for mining client sentiments on items
or organizations through their audits or online posts. It finds
wide selection in showcasing and client relationship admin-
istration (CRM). Numerous techniques have been produced
to mine opinion from writings our motivation is to accom-
plish further and better comprehension of understudy’s en-
counters particularly their learning-related issues and issues.
To figure out what understudy issues a tweet shows is a more
entangled undertaking than to decide the assumption of a
tweet notwithstanding for a human judge. Hence, our investi-
gation requires a subjective examination.
Algorithms Used
This examination constructed a multilabel classifier to sort
tweets remains on the classifications created in content in-
vestigation stage. There are various very much preferred
classifiers for the most part utilized as a part of information
mining and machine learning field. It builds up that Nave
Bayes classifier to be exceptionally proficient for this dataset
contrasted and assist multilabel classifiers [7].
1 Text Pre-Processing
Twitter customer utilizes different strange images to express
certain centrality. For Ex, is utilized to determine a hash tag, @
used to indicate a client record, and RT is utilized to demon-
strate a retweet. Twitter clients periodically copy letters in
words in this way to feature the words, for ex, “soooocuuu-
teeee”, “verrrryyyysmmmaaaart”, and “Looooking amazing”.
Furthermore, basic stop words, for example, “an, an, and, of,
he, she, it”, nonletter images, and accentuation also convey
Cite this article: Pridhivi Raj Kandula. Data Mining of Social Media Statistical Techniques for Analyzing Student’s Problems in Universities.
EMS Eng Sci j 2018, 2(1):009.
commotion in content. So, we preprocessed the writings be-
fore preparing the classifier.
1. First evacuate each designing Problems hash labels. What’s
more, for new happening hash labels, simply evacuated the
sign, and held the hash label writings.
2. For recognizing negative feeling and issues negative words
are utilized. in this way it supplants words completing with
“n’t” and additionally visit negative words (e.g. actually no,
not, nothing) as negtoken”.
3. Detached each single word that incorporates non-letter
images and accentuation. This fused the cancellation of @
and http joins. Additionally, erase all the RTs.
4. For recreated letters inside words, arrangement when it
finds two coordinating letters duplicating, it held them two.
On the off chance that it distinguished in excess of two same
Letters reproducing, substitute them with one letter. Subse-
quently, “soooocuuuteeee” is remedied to “”So charming”. At
first exact words, for example, “Sweet” and “pal” were kept as
they were.
5. At this point it utilized the Lemur information recupera-
tion toolbox to dispose of the continuous stop words. It kept
words like “much, parcel, some, all, eternity, still, just”, on the
grounds that the tweets.
2 Naive Bayes Multi-Label Classifier
The Naive Bayes classifier is a straightforward probabilistic
classifier which is based on Bayes theorem with strong and
naïve self-government assumptions. It is one of the most
basic text categorization method with various applications
in email spam exposure, private mail sorting, document
categorization, language discovery and sentiment discov-
ery. Naive Bayes executes well in many difficult real-world
troubles. Even though it is frequently outperformed by oth-
er techniques such as boosted trees, Max Entropy, Support
Vector Machines etc., Naive Bayes classifier is extremely effi-
cient since it is less computationally, and it requires a small
amount of preparation information. One well-liked way to
execute multi-label classifier is to convert the multi-label or-
ganization problem into multiple single-label categorization
problems.
Next is the necessary action of the multi-label Naive Bayes
classifier. Assume there are sum of W words in the prepar-
ing document compilation in this case, every tweet is a doc-
ument.
D = d1;d2; : : : ; dw, and a total amount of M categories K =
k1; k2; : : : ; kM. If a word dw appears in a category k for n d
wk times, and appear in categories other than k for n d wk ′
times, then, the probability of this word in a definite category
c is
Similarly, the probability of this word in categories other than
c is:
3/7

Suppose there are an entire number of X documents in the
preparing set, and K of them are in category k. Then the prob-
ability of category k is
And the probability of other categories k’ is
For a document di in the trying set, there are Y words Wdi =
wi1;wi2; : : : ; wiY, and Wdi is a subset of D. The purpose is to
classify this document into category c or not c. We assume
independence among each word in this document, and any
word wik conditioned on k or k’ follows multinomial distri-
bution. Therefore, according to Bayes Theorem, the probabil-
ity that di fit in to category k is
and the probability that di fit into group other than c is
Because p k di + p(k ′ + di),it normalize the latter two items
which are comparative to p k di and p k′ di to get the actual
values of p k di . If p k di is larger than the probability thresh-
old T, then di fit into category k, otherwise, di does fit into cat-
egory k. Then do again this process for every category. In this
execution, if for a definite document, there is none category
with a positive probability larger than T, it allocates the one
category with the largest probability to this document. In cal-
culation, others is an special group. A tweet is only allocated
to others while others is the just category among probability
greater than T.
1. The Tree Construction Algorithm
Decision trees are influential and well-liked tools for catego-
rization. Decision tree is a classifier which is in the type of
a tree organization. The highest choice node in a tree which
matches to the best interpreter named root node.
Decision node: specifies a test on attribute and have two or
more branches.
Leaf node: It indicates the value of the target attribute i.e. rep-
resents a classification or decision.
Arc/edge: Split of one attributes
Path: A disjunction of examination to make the final conclu-
sion [3].
This algorithm uses a divide and conquers approach to build
Cite this article: Pridhivi Raj Kandula. Data Mining of Social Media Statistical Techniques for Analyzing Student’s Problems in Universities.
EMS Eng Sci j 2018, 2(1):009.
a decision tree. It builds up a decision tree for a given train-
ing set T made up of set of training instances. Training set is
a group of records. Each record contains a set of attributes;
one of the attributes is the class. An instance is defined as val-
ues of attributes and a class. Decision trees classify instanc-
es by opening at the root of the tree and moving all the way
through it until a leaf node. Let the classes be represented
by {C1, C2, …,Cn}. Originally, the class occurrence is comput-
ed for instance in training set T. If all instances are belonging
to the similar class, node K with that class is build. However,
if set T include instances that is belonging to more than one
class, then the test for choosing attribute for dividing is carry
out and the attribute fulfilling dividing criteria is chosen for
the test at that node. The training set T is then divided into k
limited subsets {T1, T2, …,Tk } on the base of this assessment
and the algorithm is recursively applied on every nonempty
division. The algorithm for creation of a decision tree is given
below.
1) Create (T)
2) Computefreq (Ci, T).
3) I fall instances fit in to similar class, then return leaf.
4) For each attribute attesting for splitting criteria is con-
ducted Attribute fulfilling test is test node K.
5) Recursively create (Ti) on each division Ti. Insert those
nodes as child of node K.
6) Stop.
Choosing the best attribute for splitting
The selection of attribute at each node is a most important
procedure. Various approach projected to select the best at-
tribute.
Using Information Theory
The information gain is depending on the reduce in entropy
behind a dataset is divide on an attribute. creating a decision
tree is all concerning the discovering attribute that returns
the maximum information gain. Purpose of process of data
categorization is to exploit the information gain as it leads
to rise in categorization accuracy. Information gain is an im-
purity-based criterion that uses the entropy measure (origin
from information theory) as the impurity measure. The gain
is described as the information get from a message based on
its probability P. For any set of instances T, the probability
that an instance fit in to class Ci is specified as
P = frequency (Ci,T) |T| (1)
Where |T| is number of instances in set T and freq (Ci,T) rep-
resented the number of instances in T that fit in to class Ci..
Now, the average information enclosed in set T concerning
class relationship of instances, called entropy of set T, and is
calculated in bits as in for T = Pi k i=1 × log2(Pi)bits(2)
k is the number of classes in set T. The test X performed at a
node on the chosen attribute gives subsets T1, T2, …,Tk . The
information by this dividing process is calculated as the sum
over these subsets, is given as in for x T |Ti| |T| × k i=1 in for
Ti (3)
4/7

The reduction in entropy due to portioning of T with test X on
the chosen attribute, represented as Gain (X), is calculated as
gain X = in for T – in for x (T) (4)
The attribute which gives highest information gain is pre-
ferred. The trouble with above approach for accumulation
of test quality at a hub is that it is one-sided towards char-
acteristics with a considerable measure of qualities when
contrasted with traits with less esteems and it prompts ex-
pansive choice trees that feebly sum up the trouble. This is-
sue can be evacuated with standardization of pick up basis
and use of pick up proportion. The pickup proportion figures
proportion of data produced by partioning T and is commu-
nicated as
(5)
The split info(X) calculates information gained by splitting
training set T into k subsets on test X.
(6)
The characteristic is decided for the test which acquires
greatest pick up proportion. This approach has issue that it
tends to support properties for which split info(X) is little.
Another issue is that pick-up proportion can be ascertained
just when the split info(X) is nonzero. To overcome this issue,
Quinlan prescribed figure data increase over each one quali-
ties and considering characteristics with data pick up which
is in any event as substantial as normal of data increase over
all properties. The utilization of pick up proportion gives en-
hanced precision and intricacy of classifier.
Data pick up is typically a decent quality measure for choos-
ing the pertinence of a property, it isn’t perfect. A critical
trouble emerges when data pick up is identify with qualities
that can go up against an immense number of partitioned es-
teems. For instance, accept that one is building a choice tree
for a few information concerning the clients of a business.
Data pick up is much of the time apply to settle on a choice
that which of the traits are the primarily proper, so they can
be tried near the base of the tree. Data pick up proportion
is utilized now and then. This predisposition the choice tree
contrary to trusting qualities with countless esteems. Not-
withstanding, qualities with exceptionally little data esteems
at that point wind up noticeable to acquire an unjustifiable
advantage.
Proposed Method
Proposed framework built up a work process to assemble
both subjective examination and vast scale information min-
ing systems it focuses on building understudy’s Twitter pres-
ents on known issue and inconveniences in their instructive
practices. Initial an example is taken from understudy and
after that it direct subjective examination on that example
Cite this article: Pridhivi Raj Kandula. Data Mining of Social Media Statistical Techniques for Analyzing Student’s Problems in Universities.
EMS Eng Sci j 2018, 2(1):009.
which is related to building understudies instructive life [4].
It discovered designing understudies experience issues, for
example, overwhelming learning load, absence of social gath-
ering, and rest lack. remain on these results, creators apply
a multi-mark characterization calculation to classify tweets
introducing understudy’s issues. At that point choice tee cal-
culation is connected to make more precise outcome it will
perform separating after that utilized the calculation to set
up a finder of understudy issues. This examination displays
a strategy and result that exhibit how easygoing web-based
social networking information can show understanding into
understudy’s occurrence.
In this examination it actualized a multi-name characteri-
zation display where we allowed one tweet to go down into
numerous classifications in the meantime. Our arrangement
is contrasted and other non-specific groupings. Our work
grows the scope of information driven methodologies in in-
structing, for example, learning examination and instructive
information mining.
The critical point in proposed think about is, first, it propos-
es a work process to connect and coordinate a subjective
research philosophy and vast scale information mining sys-
tems. It constructs our information mining calculation with
respect to subjective knowledge coming about because of
human seeing, so it can increase further comprehension of
the information. At that point apply the calculation to anoth-
er substantial scale and unexplored dataset, with the goal
that the physical strategy is made strides. Second, the paper
gives profound bits of knowledge into building understudy’s
instructive encounters as responded in casual, uncontrolled
situations. Numerous issues and issues, for example, consid-
er life adjust, absence of rest, absence of social engagement,
and absence of assorted variety obviously develop. These
could bring attention to instructive specialist, arrangement
producer.
System Architecture
Fig 1: System workflow
5/7
System Flow
The framework stream is appeared in the figure underneath:
In this framework there is an investigative strategy to locate
the fitting information and suitable Twitter hash labels, and
afterward a Twitter hash tag is a word that is beginning with
a sign, which is utilized to feature or label an issue.
Social event of tweets utilizing the hash label building Prob-
lems. This relates to the stage 1 In Fig. 1.
Next in the stage 2 and 3 of Fig. 1. The inductive substance
investigation is performing on the example on designing is-
sue. In stage 4, it is discovered that the significant issue that
comes into designing understudies fall into various surely
understood classes. In view of these classifications, a mul-
tilabel Nave Bayes arrangement calculation and choice tree
classifier is executed for characterization [10].
In stage 5 the execution of the classifiers is assessed by con-
trasting it and other multilabel classifiers.
In stage 6 the grouping calculation is connected by System to
set up a locator that assistance acknowledgment of building
understudy’s issues. The outcomes are given by stage 7 help
teachers to recognize in danger understudies and settle on
choices on legitimate obstruction to save them.
Fig.2. Architecture
Inductive Content Analysis
There are none predefined classifications of the information
that is gathered, so there is need to find what understudies
saying in the tweets. Along these lines, it first does an induc-
tive substance investigation on designing Problems dataset.
Inductive substance investigation is one very much enjoyed
subjective research system for physically assessing content
substance.
Cite this article: Pridhivi Raj Kandula. Data Mining of Social Media Statistical Techniques for Analyzing Student’s Problems in Universities.
EMS Eng Sci j 2018, 2(1):009.
Extension of Categories
The 5 conspicuous subjects are: substantial examination
stack, absence of social engagement, negative feeling, rest
issues, and decent variety issues. Each subject uncovers one
issue or troubles that building understudies have in their life.
It sets up that numerous no of tweets fit in to in excess of one
classification. For instance, “I am nourished up of study why
I’m not in move school? Loathe being in designing school. An
excess of stuff. Far excessively troublesome. No appreciate”
comes into substantial examination load, and negative feeling
in the meantime. Henceforth one tweet can have numerous
classifications. This is a multilabel grouping as complexity to
a solitary mark arrangement in which each tweet can fall just
in one class. The no of classifications where one tweet fit in to
are called tweets names generally name set.
The Prominent Themes
If the 1 tweet comes into numerous classes, it is checked a
few occasions. Measure of tweets in each gathering look at.
Here extensive measure of tweets falls into “Others”. If it’s
not too much trouble note, model tweets displayed in each
subject may likewise go down in various further classes at a
similar example, aside from ones in “others.
Conclusion
Mining online networking information is useful to analysts
in learning investigation, instructive information evacuation,
and learning expertise. It gives an approach to looking at so-
cial medium insights that overcome the principle limitations
of both physical subjective investigation and tremendous
scale computational investigation of client delivered printed
content. Two calculations are helpful for this characterization
first the Naive Bayes Multi-Name Classifier and Second the
Tree development calculation. It tells instructive director, and
other pertinent appraisal creators to grow additionally toler-
ating of designing understudies’ foundation understanding.
References
1. Xin Chen, MihaelaVorvoreanu, Krishna Madhavan. Mining
Social Media Data for Understanding Students’ Learning Ex-
periences. IEEE tarnsactions on learning Technologies. 2014,
7(4): 246-259.
2. Rost M, Barkhuus L, Cramer H, Brown B. Representation
and communication: challengesin interpreting large social
media datasets. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on
Computer Supported cooperative work. 2013, 357–362.
3. Clark M, Sheppard S, Atman C, Fleming L, Miller R et al. Ac-
ademic pathways study: Processes and realities. In Proceed-
ings of the American Society for Engineering Education An-
nual Conference and Exposition. 2008.
4. R Ferguson. The state of learning analytics in 2012: A Re-
view and future challenges. Knowledge Media Institute. Tech-
nical Report. KMI.2012.
6/7
5. R Baker, K Yacef. The state of educational data mining in
2009: A review and future visions. Journal of Educational
Data Mining. 2009, 1(1): 3–17.

6. Tsoumakas G, Katakis I, Vlahavas I. Mining Multi-label data,

Data mining and knowledge discovery handbook. 2010,
667-685.

7. Dipak V Patil, Bichkar RS. Issues in Optimization of Deci-

sion Tree Learning: A Survey. International Journal of Applied
Information Systems. 2012, 3(5): 13-29.

8. AK Santra, S Jayasudha. Classification of Web Log Data to

Identify Interested Users. Using Naïve Bayesian Classification
in International Journal of Computer Science. 2012, 9(1):
381-387.

9. Manning CD, Raghavan P, Schtze H. Introduction to Infor-

mation Retrieval. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University
Press, 2008.

10. Siemens G, Long P. Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learn-

ing and education. Educause Review. 2011, 46(5): 30–32.

Cite this article: Pridhivi Raj Kandula. Data Mining of Social Media Statistical Techniques for Analyzing Student’s Problems in Universities.
EMS Eng Sci j 2018, 2(1):009.
7/7