Readme

IN THE COURT OF SH.
KAPIL KUMAR, MM, ROHINI COURTS, DELHI
FIR NO. 30/13
PS. Adarsh Nagar

CHARGE
I, Kapil Kumar, MM, Rohini Courts, Delhi do hereby charge
you (1) Chander Bhan S/o Lt Sh Devi Dayal, (2) Somi S/o Chander
Bhan (3) Dalip @ Tinda S/o Chander Bhan and (4) Raj Kumar S/o
Jagat Pal as under:
That on 25/26.01.2001 at about 10.30 PM near Vishal Durga
Mandir, Lal Bagh, Azad Pur Delhi within the jurisdiction of PS.
Adarsh Nagar, all of you in furtherance of your common intention
wrongfully restrained the complainant Amar Singh, gave him
beatings with fist and kick blows and thereby, voluntarily caused
grievous hurt upon the person of Amar Singh and you all were
figting in a public place and disturbed the public peace and
committed the affray and thus thereby all of you committed an
offence punishable under Section 160/325/341/34 IPC within the
cognizance of this Court.
And I hereby direct that you all be tried by this court for the
aforesaid offences.
MM/Rohini/Delhi/26.02.2015.
The charge has been read over and explained to the

accused and they have questioned as hereunder:
Q. Do you plead guilty or claim trial ?
Ans I plead not guilty and claim trial.
RO & AC
MM/Rohini/Delhi/26.02.2015.
FIR No. 30/13
P. S. Adarsh Nagar
26.02.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the state.
Accused persons with counsel.
Ld. Counsel for accused persons submits that the documents
supplied were complete.
Arguments on charge heard.
Prima Offence U/s 160/325/341/34 IPC made out against
accused persons.
Charge framed separately. Same is explained to the accused
persons to which they pleaded not guilty and claim trial.
Put up for PE on 10.07.2015.
Complainant be summoned for NDOH.

(Kapil Kumar)
MM06, North District
Rohini Courts, Delhi
26.02.2015.
FIR No. 153/05
PS. Adarsh Nagar
26.02.2015
PW 5 Statement of Suresh (Recalled for examination chief as deferred on
29.09.2014.)
On SA
I correctly identified the accused Anaro Devi is present in the
court today. At this stage MHC(M) has produced two unsealed pullandas
bearing the particulars of the case. Both the pullandas are having the knots.
The DD 61B entry is also produced by the MHC(M) regarding depleted the
jute bags. The case property shown to the witness and witness correctly
identified the same. The case property is ExP1.
XXXX by Sh S.K Verma Ld Counsel for accused.
I do not know as to whether the clothes are belonging to Anaro
Devi. Vol It was recovered from accused Anaro Devi. I am not the owner of
C30 Sarai Pipal Thala, Adarsh Nagar, Delhi. It is correct that I am not paying
rent for that property. It is wrong to suggest that the Anaro Devi is the owner of
C30 Sarai Pipal Thala, Adarsh Nagar, Delhi. It is wrong to suggest that no
recovery was effected from the possession of Anaro Devi. It is wrong to
suggest that I did not know to the accused Anaro Devi prior to the incident. It
is wrong to suggest that I am deposing falsely.
RO & AC. (Kapil Kumar)
Rohini Courts, Delhi/26.02.2015
FIR No. 153/02
PS. Adarsh Nagar
26.02.2015
PW6 Statement of Dr, Neeraj Chaudary Medical Officer, BJRM Hospital.
On SA
I have been deputed by MS BJRM Hospital to depose the MLC no.
03125 and 03126 on the behalf of Dr.Shafi and Dr. Manish. Both the doctors
had left the hospital. I can identify the signature and handwriting as they have
worked with me.
On dated 24.04.2002 patient Nirmala aged about 47 years female
brought in casualty with alleged history of RTA. Patient was examined by Dr.
Shafi and referred the patient to LNJP Hospital for further management. The
MLC Ex.PW6/A bearing the signature of Dr Shafi at point A.
On the same day patient Ghanshyamm Dass aged about 27 years
male brought in casualty with alleged history of RTA. Patient was examined
by Dr. Manish and he opined the injuries as grievous. The MLC Ex.PW6/B
bearing the signature of Dr Manish at point A and B and the injury mentioned
grievous at point C.
XXXXX by accused.
Nil. Opportunity given.
RO & AC (Kapil Kumar)
FIR No. 153/02
PS. Adarsh Nagar
26.02.2015
PW 7 Statement of Retd SI Rajeshwar S/o S.P Chaubey R/o Village
Nawadih PS Bihaya, District Bhoj Pur, Bihar.
On SA
On 24.05.2002 I was posted at PS Adarsh Nagar as a SI.
After receiving DD no 19A I along with Ct Ram Meher Singh went to
Mukund Pur Road Delhi Jal Board Water Plant Gate no.1. Where
apprised that due to titling of TSR some persons got injured and they
were shifted to BJRM Hospital by PSR. I along with Ct Ram Mehar
reached at BJRM Hospital and collected the MLC of Ghanshyam,
Nirmala and Rekha. I recorded the statement of Ghanshyam which is
already ExPW1/A bears my signature at point B. After I prepared the
rukka and handed over the same to Ct Ram Meher and sent him to PS
Adarsh Nagar for lodging the FIR. After sometime Ct Ram Meher came
back at the hospital and handed over the rukka and copy of FIR to me.
The son of Nirmala, Anil was also present in the hospital. I also recorded
the statement of Nirmala and Rekha. After that I along with Ct Rama
Mehar and Anil were came back at the spot. I prepared the site plan at the
instance of Anil and also recorded his statement. We searched the driver
2
of TSR but he could not be traced out on that day.
On 29.04.2002 I seized the offending TSR bearing
registration no DL 1CE 9199 vide seizure memo already ExPW5/C bears
my signature at point B.
On 26.05.2002 I arrested the accused Kishan Chand vide
arrest memo already ExPW5/A which bears my signature at point B,
accused is present in the court today(correctly identified). The accused
was released on bail after furnishing the bail bond. After that I collected
the final opinion on MLC and it was grievous injuries on all three
victims. After I prepared the charge sheet in the present matter filed
before the Hon'ble Court.
XXXXX by accused.
Nil. Opportunity given.

RO & AC
(Kapil Kumar)
FIR No. 06/14
PS. Swaroop Nagar
26.02.2015
Vehicle No DL 8SAS 8415

Registered owner of the vehicle Sh Robin is present.
The transferee of the vehicle Sh Kapur Chand is also present.
In present case an application is moved by MHC(M) stating that
the vehicle bearing no DL 8SAS 8415 has been seized by the police and
lying in the malkhana of the police station. It is stated that no body is coming
forward to claim the vehicle. Summons were issued to the registered owner of
the above mentioned vehicle. The registered owner Sh Robin Rana S/o
Gyanender is present in the court and submitted that he sold the vehicle to
one Kapur Chand S/o Roshan Lal R/o H.no 7, Village Nangli Poona Delhi.
His statement recorded separately. The transferee of the vehicle Sh Kapur
Chand wishes to take the present vehicle on superdari. IO also seized all the
documents qua the present case from Sh Kapur Chand only.
Heard.
In these circumstances the aforesaid vehicle be released to the

Kapur Chand subject to the following conditions:
1. Vehicle in question be released to Kapur Chand subject to

furnishing of superdarinama in the sum of Rs. 30,000/- to the satisfaction of
the concerned SHO/IO.
2. IO shall prepare detailed panchnama also mentioning the colour,

appearance, Engine No., Chasis No., registered owner and other necessary
details of the vehicle.
3. IO shall take the colour photographs of the vehicle from different

angles and also of the engine no. and the chasis no. of the vehicle;
4. The photographs should be attested and counter signed by the

registered owner, IO and the accused;
5. IO shall get the vehicle value from a proper valuer and shall take
a valuation report in this regard from the valuer;
Copy of this order be given dasti to the applicant.

Copy of this order be also sent to SHO concerned for
compliance.
(Kapil Kumar)
Rohini Courts,Delhi/26.02.2015
FIR No. 669/14
P. S..Adarsh Nagar
26.02.2015
Accused Shahid @ Sonu S/o Shahdat Ali and Naresh @
Tinku S/o Devi Ram produced from JC in compliance of production
warrant.
IO HC Bal Kishan in person.
Accused persons are represented by LAC Vivek Gautam.
IO moved an application for interrogation and formal arrest
of the accused persons.
Heard. Interrogation allowed for 30 minutes as per rules with
liberty to the IO to arrest the accused persons if necessary and the
grounds of arrest are to be clearly mentioned.
Put up after 30 minutes.

(Kapil Kumar)
26.02.2015
After 30 minutes
Accused persons produced after fresh arrest.
IO HC Bal Kishan in person.
Accused is represented by LAC Vivek Gautam .
Accused persons have been arrested by the IO formally.
Grounds for arrest examined. Found reasonable.
IO moved an application for fourteen days judicial custody.
Heard.
It is submitted by the IO that the accused persons have been
arrested in this case as their arrest was necessary for proper investigation
of this case and also for securing his presence in the court. It is further
submitted by the IO that information regarding arrest of accused persons
have given to their relatives.
Hence, accused persons are remanded to JC.
Be produced on 12.03.2015 through EVL.
Copy of the order be given dasti.

(Kapil Kumar)
FIR No. 573/2014
PS. Adarsh Nagar
26.02.2015
Present: Ld. APP for State.

Applicant Sanjay Rathi with counsel.
The present application for release of vehicle bearing No. DL

9SR 3244 on superdari has been filed by the applicant.
Reply has been filed under the signature of SI Jolen Dhanga
and submitted that there is no objection for the release of the vehicle.
Heard.
In these circumstances the aforesaid vehicle be released to the
applicant subject to the following conditions:
1. Vehicle in question be released to its registered owner only

subject to furnishing of superdarinama in the sum of Rs. 80,000/- to the
satisfaction of the concerned SHO/IO.

appearance, Engine No., Chasis No., registered owner and other necessary
details of the vehicle.
3. IO shall take the colour photographs of the vehicle from different

angles and also of the engine no. and the chasis no. of the vehicle;

complainant, accused and the applicant;
5. IO shall get the vehicle value from a proper valuer and shall take
a valuation report in this regard from the valuer;

compliance.
(Kapil Kumar)
MM/Rohini/Delhi
26.02.2015
FIR No. 275/14
PS. Swaroop Nagar
26.02.2015
Present: Ld. APP for State.

Applicant Deepa Sharma with counsel.
The present application for release of jewellery(Gold and Silver)

on superdari has been filed by the applicant. This jewellery consists of a pair
of 200 Gram Silver Anklet, one Gold Chain of 3 tolas and Pair of Gold Ear
Rings of 10 Grams.
Reply has been filed under the signature of SI Naresh Bhatia.
The bills of the jewellery as filed by the applicant were got verified.
Pertinent to mention here that above mentioned jewellery items
are not the case property as theft was of sandal woods. No purpose would
have been served in keeping above mentioned jewellery items in malkahna.
Heard.
In these circumstances the aforesaid jewellery be released to
the applicant subject to the following conditions:
1. Jewellery(Gold and Silver) in question be released to its

registered owner only subject to furnishing of superdarinama in the sum of
Rs. 1,00,000/- to the satisfaction of the concerned SHO/IO.

appearance.
3. IO shall take the colour photographs of the jewellery(Gold and

Silver) from different angles.

complainant, accused and the applicant;
5. IO shall get the jewellery(Gold and Silver) value from a proper

valuer and shall take a valuation report in this regard from the valuer;

compliance.
(Kapil Kumar)
MM/Rohini/Delhi
26.02.2015
CC no. 70/1/15
Bhupender Singh Vs. Imran Khan
PS. Adarsh Nagar
26.02.2015
Fresh complaint received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered.
Present: Ld Counsel for complainant along with complainant.
Ld Counsel for complainant request for adjournment for
filing certain documents on records qua the issue of limitation.
At request, put up on 26.03.2015.

(Kapil Kumar)
CC no. 845/1/13
Smt Nirmala Devi Vs. Somi & Ors.
PS. Adarsh Nagar
26.02.2015

Statement of Smt Nirmala Devi W/o Sh Amar Singh R/o H.no N123/182
Lal Bagh, Azad Pur Delhi.
On SA
I wish to withdraw the present complaint case as the FIR no.
30/13 was registered on my complaint in PS Adarsh Nagar. The charge
sheet has been filed in that matter. I do not want to pursue the present
compliant case. I am making this statement without any force or
coercion.
RO&AC.

(Kapil Kumar)
CC No. 845/1/13
Smt Nirmala Devi Vs. Somi & Ors.
PS. Adarsh Nagar
26.02.2015
Present: Complainant with counsel from DLSA Sh Ajay Kumar.
Complainant wishes to withdraw the present case as the FIR
no. 30/13 has already been registered in the present matter and charge
sheet has been filed in that matter. Statement of complainant recorded
separately. Complainant is identified by Ld Counsel Sh Ajay Kumar.
In view of the statement of complainant the present
complaint is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
File be consigned to Record Room after due compliance.

(Kapil Kumar)
CC no. 291/1/14
Chet Ram Rohta Vs. Mohd Zaffar Alam
PS. Adarsh Nagar.
26.02.2015
CW1 : Statement of complainant Chet Ram Rohta S/o Sh S.N
Rohta R/o Village and PO Baggi, Tehsil Narkanda, District
Shimla, HP.
On S.A.
I tender my presummoning evidence by way of affidavit
which is Ex.CW1/X, bearing my signatures at point Y and Y1. I
rely upon documents i.e. Ex.CW1/1 to Ex.CW1/11.
I close my presummoning evidence.
R.O. & A.C.

(Kapil Kumar)
26.02.2015
CC no. 291/1/14
PS Adarsh Nagar
26.02.2015
Present: Complainant with counsel.
Presummoning evidence by way of an affidavit of complainant is already on
record. Same is tendered in evidence. The complainant closes his presummoning evidence.
I have perused the record and heard the complainant.
Present complaint case is based upon the allegations that the accused issued the
cheques in question in discharge of his liability as mentioned in the complaint. On
presentation, the said cheques were dishonoured. Thereafter, legal notice was sent by the
complainant within the stipulated period. Despite service, accused failed to make the
payment. The complainant has filed this complaint within the period of limitation, praying for
initiation of proceedings against the accused under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument
Act. The complainant has filed cheques in original, Original of the Return Memo, copy of
legal notice and postal receipts in original.
From the documents on record and affidavit filed on behalf of complainant, prima
facie a case u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act is made out against the accused.
Accordingly, the accused be summoned on filing of PF, RC & approved courier
returnable on 15.04.2015 . Summons shall be accompanied with copy of complaint. Steps be
taken within seven days.
(Kapil Kumar)
26.02.2015
CC no. 281/1/14
PS. Adarsh Nagar.
26.02.2015
CW1 : Statement of AR of complainant namely Manoj Garg
S/o Narender Kumar office at 283D, Katra Pedan, Tilak
Bazar, Delhi.
On S.A.
I tender my presummoning evidence by way of affidavit
which is Ex.CWA, bearing my signatures at point A and B. I rely
upon already documents i.e. Ex.CW1/1 to Ex.CW1/10.
I close my presummoning evidence.
R.O. & A.C.

(Kapil Kumar)
26.02.2015
CC no. 281/1/14
PS Adarsh Nagar
26.02.2015.
Present: Complainant with counsel.

Presummoning evidence by way of an affidavit of complainant is already on
record. Same is tendered in evidence. The complainant closes his presummoning evidence.
I have perused the record and heard the complainant.
Present complaint case is based upon the allegations that the accused issued the
cheque in question in discharge of his liability as mentioned in the complaint. On
presentation, the said cheque was dishonoured. Thereafter, legal notice was sent by the
complainant within the stipulated period. Despite service, accused failed to make the
payment. The complainant has filed this complaint within the period of limitation, praying for
initiation of proceedings against the accused under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument
Act. The complainant has filed cheque in original, Original of the Return Memo, copy of
legal notice and postal receipts in original.
From the documents on record and affidavit filed on behalf of complainant, prima
facie a case u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act is made out against the accused.
Accordingly, the accused no.1 and 3 be summoned on filing of PF, RC & approved
courier returnable on 08.04.2015. Summons shall be accompanied with copy of complaint.
Steps be taken within seven days.
(Kapil Kumar)
26.02.2015
CC no. 137/01
Ramji Singh Vs. State.
PS. Swaroop Nagar
26.02.2015

Present: Ld Counsel for complainant along with complainant.
Summons issued to accused Dushyant Chauhan came with the
report 'in complete address.'
Fresh address be filed within 2 weeks. Thereafter summons be
issued as per last order dated 08.12.2014 for NDOH.
Summons issued to accused Vijay Sharama came with the report
'no persons reside at the given address'. Ld Counsel for complainant submits
that the address filed is the correct address and accused is deliberately avoiding
the service. Fresh summons be issued against the accused Vijay Sharma on the
address already filed/new address if any, filed by the complainant with the
direction to the process server to affix the summon in case of
refusal/unavailability of accused.
Service be effected through concerned SHO.
Steps be taken within a week.
Put up on 22.04.2015.
(Kapil Kumar)
CC no. 05/1/14
Sant Kumar Vs. Pravesh Grovers & Ors.
PS. Swaroop Nagar.
26.02.2015
Statement of complainant Sant Kumar S/o Sh Chinkant R/o 69/G3 Block
A, Indraprasth Delhi.
On SA
I am the complainant in the present case. I wish to withdraw
the present complaint as the matter has been settled between me and
respondents. I am making this statement without any force and coercion.
RO&AC.
(Kapil Kumar)
26.02.2015
CC No. 05/1/14
Sant Kumar Vs Parvesh Grover
PS. Swarop Nagar
26.02.2015
Present: Complainant in person.
Complainant wishes to withdraw the present case as
settlement arrived between the complainant and respondents. Statement
of complainant recorded separately. Photocopy of Voter IDcard of
complainant is taken on record as proof of his identification.
In view of the statement of complainant the present
complaint is hereby dismissed as withdrawn being settled.

(Kapil Kumar)
CC No. 152/1/14
Jan Nidhi Coop Society Vs. Raj Pal
P. S. Ad. Nagar
26.02.2015
Statement of AR of complainant Sunil Gupta S/o Sh Ram Kumar Gupta
R/o G3/40, Model TownIII, Delhi.
On SA
I am the AR in the present complaint. I wish to withdraw
the present case as the matter has been settled between complainant
society and accused. I am making the statement without any force and
coercion. I have no objection if the present complaint be dismissed as
withdrawn.
RO&AC.

(Kapil Kumar)
26.02.2015
CC No. 152/1/14
Jan Nidhi Coop Society Vs. Raj Pal
P. S. Adarsh. Nagar
26.02.2015
Present: AR of complainant with counsel.
It is submitted by the AR of complainant that the matter has been
settled with the accused amicably.
Statement of AR of complainant recorded separately to this effect.
This court is satisfied that that the settlement has been arrived at
voluntarily and without any force or coercion.
Documents if any be returned to the respective parties against receipt
and after verification of particulars and after cancellation of endorsement as per rules.
The present complaint case is hereby disposed off as settled as
withdrawn.
(Kapil Kumar)
CC no. 150/1/14
PS. Adarsh Nagar
26.02.2015

Present: Ld Counsel for complainant along with AR.
Summons issued upon the accused unserved. Reports
perused.
Issue fresh summons upon the accused with the direction to
the process server to affix the summon in case of refusal/unavailability of
accused.
Service be effected through concerned SHO.
Put up on 17.04.2015

(Kapil Kumar)
CC no. 151/1/14
Jan Nidhi Coop Society Vs. Anju Saxena
PS. Adarsh Nagar
26.02.2015

Present: Ld Counsel with AR of complainant.
Summons issued upon accused came with the report 'left'.
Fresh address be filed within 2 weeks. Thereafter summons
issued upon the accused as per last order for 17.04.2015.

(Kapil Kumar)
CC no. 184/1/4 and 185/1/4
Dale Fruits Vs Deepak Kundra
PS. Adarsh Nagar
26.02.2015

Present: AR of the complainant along with counsel.
Accused with counsel.
Accused is Accused is admitted to bail on furnishing
personal bond of Rs.30,000/ and one surety of like amount.
Bail bond furnished and accepted.
In my opinion, there is a possibility of settlement. Parties are
apprised of the process of Lok Adalat. They are willing to settle the
matter before Lok Adalat.
As per directions of DLSA North, Delhi there shall be a
continuous Lok Adalat held on each day and cases have to be referred for
the said daily Lok Adalat. This is a fit case to refer to the continuous Lok
Adalat.
The procedure devised by DLSA for referring the matter to
Lok Adalat is that file has to be sent to the Ld Secretary, District Legal
Service Authority for further directions who may assign it to the Lok
Adalat. In view thereof, it is directed that file be place before Sh Hem
Raj, Ld Secretary, North District Legal Services Authority at 12 Noon
today itself for referring the same to Evening Lok Adalat. Ahlamd shall
sent the file immediately. The parties shall also appear before the Ld
Secretary. The matter shall be taken up again before this court as per the
directions of Lok Adalat. The Lok Adalat may, if deemed fit secure the
presence of the other necessary persons in order to effectuate a
settlement with the accused.

(Kapil Kumar)
FIR No. 556/14
PS. Swaroop Nagar
26.02.2015
Statement of accused Pardeep @ Punny S/o Sukh Chain R/o J1523, Gali
No.2 Khadda Colony, Swaroop Nagar, Delhi.
On SA
I am the accused in the present case. I have voluntarily
compounded the offence U/s 379/411 IPC with the complainant. I am
making this statement without any force and coercion.
RO&AC
(Kapil Kumar)
26.02.2014
FIR No. 556/14
PS. Swaroop Nagar
26.02.2015
Statement of complainant Satbir Singh S/o Sh Aabhey Ram R/o 1508,
Gali no. 2 Khadda Colony, Swaroop Nagar, Delhi.
On SA
I am the complainant and registered owner of the stolen
vehicle. I have voluntarily compounded the offence U/s 379/411 IPC with
the accused. I am making this statement without any force and coercion.
RO&AC
(Kapil Kumar)
26.02.2015
FIR No. 556/14
P. S. Swaroop. Nagar
U/s 379/411 IPC.
26.02.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Accused Pardeep @ Punny produced from JC,
represented by LAC Vivek Gautam.
Complainant/Registered owner of stolen vehicle Satbir
Singh in person, represented by Ld Counsel.
Accused is facing trial for the offence U/s 379/411 IPC.
At this stage, with the judicial intervention, compromise
arrived between the parties. Both the parties want to compound the
offence U/s 379/411 IPC.
Ld. APP for the state has no objection as the offence U/s
379/411 IPC is compoundable in nature.
Statement of accused to this effect has been recorded
separately.
Separate Statement of registered owner/complainant of
the stolen vehicle to the effect of compounding has also been
recorded.
In view of the statement of both the parties offence U/s
379/411 IPC is compounded accused is acquitted for the offence
U/s 379/411 IPC.
Original documents be released to the rightful owner
against due acknowledgement and as per rules. Accused Pardeep @
Punny be released from JC, if not required in any other case.
Superdari canceled.

(Kapil Kumar)
26.02.2015
CC no. 91/1/14
PS. Swaroop Nagar
26.02.2015

Present: Ld Proxy Counsel for complainant.
Adjournment sought by the Ld Proxy Counsel as main
counsel is not available today.
Put up for advancing arguments on application U/s 156(3)
Cr.PC.
At request put up 07.04.2015.
(Kapil Kumar)
CC no. 075/1/15
PS Swaroop Nagar
26.02.2015.
Present: Ld. Counsel for the complainant alongwith complainant.
Complaint is accompanied with an application U/s 156(3)
Cr. P.C. Copy of the same be sent to SHO concerned with directions to
file ATR by the next date of hearing.
Put up for 23.03.2015.
(Kapil Kumar)
FIR No. 156/08
P. S. Swaroop Nagar
26.02.2015
Statement of Complainant Kanwal Singh S/o Budh Ram R/o Village
Nangli Poona H.no 29, Delhi36.
On SA
I am the complainant of the present FIR. I have no objection
if the present cancellation report be accepted as my daughter left my
house voluntarily and no offence was committed upon her. I shall bound
by my statement.
RO&AC.

(Kapil Kumar)
26.02.2015
FIR No. 156/08
P. S. Swaroop. Nagar
26.02.2015
Complainant Pawan Singh in person.
Kuldeep son of complainant in person.
The present case was registered on the statement of complainant
that on 28.07.2008 his daughter Jyoti left house but did not return. On the
basis of the statement of the complainant present FIR was registered and the
investigation was conducted. During the investigation daughter of complainant
Jyoti returned home. The statement of daughter of complainant i.e. Jyoti was
recorded U/s 164 Cr.P.C vide Ld. MM wherein the Jyoti had not leveled any
allegations against anybody. Today the complainant has submitted that he has
no objection if the present cancellation report be accepted. Separate statement
of complainant be recorded. Keeping in view of the statement of the
complainant the present cancellation is accepted. File be consigned to Record
Room after due compliance.
(Kapil Kumar)

FIR No. 190/13
PS. Swaroop Nagar
26.02.2015
All 8 accused persons are present.
Notice issued to the IO came with the report that SI Anil is
absent from Police Station since 20.02.2015.
In these circumstances let the extra set of documents be
called from concerned SHO with the direction of SHO to appear in
person on NDOH.
Put up on 15.04.2015.
(Kapil Kumar)
FIR No. 314/14
PS. Adarsh Nagar
26.02.2015
Accused with counsel.
An application for cancellation of NBW moved on behalf of
Anand Singh
Heard.
NBW canceled subject to cost of Rs 2000/.
Cost paid. NBW canceled.
Robkar be issued.
Complainant/registered owner Manoj be summoned for
NDOH.
Put up for PE on 22.07.2015.
(Kapil Kumar)
FIR No. 510/06
PS. Adarsh Nagar
26.02.2015
Accused Fakrudin and Tarik are already expired.
Accused Raza Mohd @ Raja produced from Bulandshaher
Jail, UP(on bail in this case).
Accused Mobin @ Mamu not produced from Bulandshar
Jail, UP.
Let the fresh productions warrants be issued against accused
Mobin @ Mamu as per last order for NDOH.
Put up on 18.03.2015.
(Kapil Kumar)
FIR No. 654/14
PS. Swaroop Nagar
26.02.2015
This is an application for 14 days Judical Remand of accused Brijesh
Kumar, S/o Manu Singh.
Accused produced from JC, represented by Ld Counsel.
IO SI Veena with case file.
On the last date of hearing the direction was given to the IO
to get the bone ossification test of the accused. On 18.02.2015
application was moved by the IO to get the bone ossification test
conducted of the accused and same was allowed.
IO states that accused was taken to BJRM Hospital on
20.02.2015 for bone ossification test but the Radiological test of the
accused was not conducted properly and she received a call from the
Doctor that the XRays are not clear.
IO placed on record the dental examination of the accused.
Further medical examination of the accused for ascertaining
his age be done as per rules. IO to do the needful immediately.
IO states that JC remand of accused is required as

investigation is pending and if the accused be released he may tamper
with the evidence.
Heard.
Report of dental examination of the accused is perused.
Accused appears to be major.
Accused is remanded to JC till 12.03.2015.
Copy dasti.
(Kapil Kumar)
FIR No. 06/14
PS. Swaroop Nagar
26.02.2015
Vehicle DL 8SAS 8415
Statement of Sh Robin Rana S/o Gyanender Singh R/o H.no 234A,

Village Nangli Poona, Delhi.
On SA
I am the registered owner of Vehicle no DL 8SAS 8415. I
had sold this vehicle to Kapur Chand S/o Roshan Lal R/o H.no 7, Village
Nangli Poona Delhi.
RO&AC.
(Kapil Kumar)
CC No. 781/1
Rahul Saxena Vs Amit Chopra.
PS. Adarsh Nagar
26.02.2015
Present : None for complainant despite repeated calls.
Court notice issued to complainant received back unserved
as the address mentioned in the complaint is not correct.
None appeared on behalf of complainant since morning. It
already 2.15 PM.
Perusal of records reveals that none appeared on behalf of
complainant since 09.05.2013. In these circumstances it is clear that
complainant is not interested in pursuing the present complaint.
Complaint is hereby is dismissed in default for non prosecution and non
appearance.
File be consigned to Record Room, after due compliance.
(Kapil Kumar)
26.02.2015
FIR No. 153/02
PS. Adarsh Nagar
26.02.2015
Accused in person.
PW6 and 7 examined and discharged.
Request for exemption of Dr Shipra Ram Pal received.
At this stage accused submits that he is unable to afford the
counsel, he is apprised of DLSA.
Put up for RPE on 23.07.2015.
(Kapil Kumar)

Readme

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Readme

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

IN THE COURT OF SH.

KAPIL KUMAR, MM, ROHINI COURTS, DELHI

wrongfully restrained the complainant Amar Singh, gave him

figting in a public place and disturbed the public peace and

The charge has been read over and explained to the

I have been deputed by MS BJRM Hospital to depose the MLC no.

were shifted to BJRM Hospital by PSR. I along with Ct Ram Mehar

reached at BJRM Hospital and collected the MLC of Ghanshyam,

On 29.04.2002 I seized the offending TSR bearing

On 26.05.2002 I arrested the accused Kishan Chand vide

Present: Ld. APP for the state.

In these circumstances the aforesaid vehicle be released to the

1. Vehicle in question be released to Kapur Chand subject to

2. IO shall prepare detailed panchnama also mentioning the colour,

3. IO shall take the colour photographs of the vehicle from different

4. The photographs should be attested and counter signed by the

Copy of this order be given dasti to the applicant.

Accused Shahid @ Sonu S/o Shahdat Ali and Naresh @

liberty to the IO to arrest the accused persons if necessary and the

Present: Ld. APP for State.

The present application for release of vehicle bearing No. DL

1. Vehicle in question be released to its registered owner only

2. IO shall prepare detailed panchnama also mentioning the colour,

3. IO shall take the colour photographs of the vehicle from different

4. The photographs should be attested and counter signed by the

Copy of this order be given dasti to the applicant.

Present: Ld. APP for State.

The present application for release of jewellery(Gold and Silver)

1. Jewellery(Gold and Silver) in question be released to its

2. IO shall prepare detailed panchnama also mentioning the colour,

3. IO shall take the colour photographs of the jewellery(Gold and

4. The photographs should be attested and counter signed by the

5. IO shall get the jewellery(Gold and Silver) value from a proper

Copy of this order be given dasti to the applicant.

Ld Counsel for complainant request for adjournment for

compliant case. I am making this statement without any force or

In view of the statement of complainant the present

cheques in question in discharge of his liability as mentioned in the complaint. On

cheque in question in discharge of his liability as mentioned in the complaint. On

direction to the process server to affix the summon in case of

Complainant wishes to withdraw the present case as

of complainant recorded separately. Photocopy of Voter ID­card of

In view of the statement of complainant the present

The present complaint case is hereby disposed off as settled as

Summons issued upon the accused unserved. Reports

Accused is Accused is admitted to bail on furnishing

As per directions of DLSA North, Delhi there shall be a

sent the file immediately. The parties shall also appear before the Ld

presence of the other necessary persons in order to effectuate a

I am the accused in the present case. I have voluntarily

I am the complainant and registered owner of the stolen

Accused Pardeep @ Punny produced from JC,

the stolen vehicle to the effect of compounding has also been

Original documents be released to the rightful owner

Adjournment sought by the Ld Proxy Counsel as main

Statement of Complainant Kanwal Singh S/o Budh Ram R/o Village

if the present cancellation report be accepted as my daughter left my

of complainant be recorded. Keeping in view of the statement of the

In these circumstances let the extra set of documents be

Complainant/registered owner Manoj be summoned for

Accused Mobin @ Mamu not produced from Bulandshar

to get the bone ossification test of the accused. On 18.02.2015

application was moved by the IO to get the bone ossification test

IO states that accused was taken to BJRM Hospital on

of complainant recorded separately. Photocopy of Voter IDcard of

Statement of Sh Robin Rana S/o Gyanender Singh R/o H.no 234A,