0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
120 visualizzazioni1 pagina
In case J17-00914 in Contra Costa County Superior Court, juvenile court, the family witnessed collusion between Judge Lois Haight and court-connected attorney Mary Carey, who privately represented the mother. Nonetheless, it appeared that Carey colluded with the Judge behind the scenes.
Titolo originale
Collusion Between Judge Lois Haight and attorney Mary Carey
In case J17-00914 in Contra Costa County Superior Court, juvenile court, the family witnessed collusion between Judge Lois Haight and court-connected attorney Mary Carey, who privately represented the mother. Nonetheless, it appeared that Carey colluded with the Judge behind the scenes.
In case J17-00914 in Contra Costa County Superior Court, juvenile court, the family witnessed collusion between Judge Lois Haight and court-connected attorney Mary Carey, who privately represented the mother. Nonetheless, it appeared that Carey colluded with the Judge behind the scenes.
TUF-00414
Preferred private lawyer referrals:
All matters with pages on this sheet refer to September 21, 2017 appearances transcripts
Mother, Andrea Wood was tald she did not qualify for public defender which was her request.
Judge Lois Haight: “You do not qualify, as | understand for the attorney”. Page 10:18-19
Judge Lois Haight: “Okay. I'm g¢
g to refer you to an attorney.” Page 6:22-23
Mother sent into the hallway with a court issued recommended lawyers list. Before she has time to read
it, the court sends Lawyer Mary Carey over to mother who introduces herself (Ms. Carey) as the
recommended lawyer for Ms, Wood. This is Ms, Wood's first introduction to Ms. Carey. Approximately
fifteen minutes later the court rushes mother back in and pressures her to pick one. Mother would have
liked more time to investigate but at that time mother was unaware or did mother suspect that 2
recommended lawyer would collude with the court against the mother (client of said lawyer).
Mary Carey was hired at $450/hour to represent mother in efforts to reunite with her children and
ultimately prove Juris findings were untrue so the mother’s three children would be released home.
‘The following week, while mother was nat in the courtroom, Mother was often forced out to waitin the
hallway to not hear proceedings.
Ms. Carey scandalously went against the mother’s interest and on transcript record said “Your honor. |
had made a request that there be no contact between my client and Hayden.” September 29, 2017
transcripts page 18:8-11
See attached:
Exhibit #1 “Juvenile Dependency attorneys for Private retainer”, hand out from Superior court
Exhibit #2 September 21, 2017 transcripts, pages 6, 10, and 18.
Exhibit #3 September 29, 2017, page 18:8-11
ECEIVEN)
Sule ihat Aue 18 208 —
ilZ7 —
a