Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Click to enlarge
An article about Global Warming from a research done by the student of year 10 :
Greenhouse effect
On Planet Earth, we can identify many factors that make life possible. One of these is the
heat radiated from the sun which is the Earth's primary energy source, a burning star so
hot that we can feel its heat from over 150 million kilometers away. Its rays enter our
atmosphere and shower upon on our planet.
About one third of this solar energy is reflected back into the universe by shimmering
glaciers, water and other bright surfaces. Two thirds, however, are
absorbed by the Earth, warming land. oceans and atmosphere.
However, in the last decades, the level of concentration of greenhouse gases, whose
purpose is to keep the lower atmosphere warm, has been increasing. This has caused a
global warming which could upset most of the ecosystems of the globe, leading to their
destruction.
The most recent assessment report complied by the IPCC observed that changes in
atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases and aerosols, land cover and solar
radiation alter the energy balance of the « climate system ». Indeed, the element of
carbon dioxide in the atmosphere nowadays is 30% reater than in the 18th century.
The greenhouse effect was discovered by Joseph Fourier, a French physicist and
mathematician in 1824. The greenhouse effect refers to circumstances where the visible
light of the sun passes through the layers of the atmosphere. In that case, some are
absorbed and transformed into a warming instrument to the earth's surface. Contributing
to the equivalent exchange of the incoming energy, the lands and oceans release heat into
the atmosphere. Some of the
gases mentioned above, such as the water vapor and carbon dioxide, absorb a fraction of
that heat helping to a warm atmosphere. What's left of that heat is
then released into space. This absorption of heat leads to more heating and a higher
resultant temperature, aiding to provide a suitable temperature warm
enough to our sustainability. Without this radiation heat-trapping caused by the so-called
greenhouse gases, the surface would have an average temperature
of -18ºC rather than our presently quite warm 15ºC. The latter temperature is necessary to
preserve life on earth. Carbon dioxide and water vapour are
probably the main human produced gases contributing to the greenhouse effect and
global warming. The earth reflects about 30% of the incoming solar
radiations. The remaining 70% warms the earth after being absorbed. Thus, the more
solar radiations are absorbed, the more the earth releases infrared
radiation to balance the flux of radiations.
Lately, the Earth has faced a warming of the litosphere which is known as anthropogenic
global warming. It is due to the increasing concentration of greenhouse effect gases in the
atmosphere caused by the overuse of cars, planes, factories, etc. despite the Kyoto
Protocol signed on the 11th December 1997 by mostly developped countries except the
USA. These accords are about decreasing the member countries greenhouse gases
emissions. The increase of greenhouse gases cause a reduction in outgoing infrared
radiation, which means that, to restore the balance between incomming and outgoing
radiation, Earth's climate must change. Global Warming is the simplest way for the
climate to get rid of excess energy. But a rise in temperature could cause many other
events, such as the consequences that follow ....
One serious consequence raised by the Greenhouse effect is the rate of sea level rise.
For the past century, the sea level has risen at an average rate of 1.8mm per year.
However between 1993 and 2003 there was a mean increase rate of 31mm per year in the
sea level change.
This rate is estimated to increase in the next one hundred years due to the increases of
gases in the atmosphere and global warming. In the next century the sea level is estimated
to rise anywhere between 90 and 880mm.
The two main causes of sea level rise are thermal expansion and the addition of water due
to the melting of ice sheets. Both these are linked to to climate change and the
Greenhouse effect.
Thermal expansion can be described as the tendency of matter to change in volume to
change in response to a change in temperature. It is the decrease in water density that
results from global warming. This leads to the expansion of the ocean and an increase in
the sea levels.
The ice sheets in a Antarctica and Greenland melt, due to the increases in temperature
and contribute to the rise of the sea levels.
An increase in the sea level could cause major disasters all over the world. These include
eroding shorelines, coastal flooding, storm damage and saltwater contamination of
freshwater supplies. The rise in sea lever also puts beaches, freshwater, coral reefs,
fisheries and wildlife habitats at risk. Some of these consequences endanger human and
animal life such as flooding.
The increase in sea levels could also cause the submerging of islands and could cause
massive economic damage with billons spent on adaptation. Pacific Islands called
Kiribati, located between Australia and Hawaii, and the Maldives are both in danger of
being submerged.
Their tides are rising and their freshwater is becoming to salty to drink. This shows a
situation were many lives are at risk and peole will have to rellocate
to continue with their lives. Indonesia is also threatened
Please help review and edit Wikimedia's 5-year strategic [Hide]
priorities.
Global warming
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Comparison of ground based (blue) and satellite based (red: UAH; green: RSS) records
of temperature variations since 1979. Trends plotted since January 1982.
Mean surface temperature change for the period 2000 to 2009 relative to the average
temperatures from 1951 to 1980.[1]
Global warming is the increase in the average temperature of Earth's near-surface air and oceans since the mid-20th century and its projected continuation.
Global surface temperature increased 0.74 ± 0.18 °C (1.33 ± 0.32 °F) between the start and the end of the 20th century.[2][A] The Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that most of the observed temperature increase since the middle of the 20th century was very likely caused by increasing
concentrations of greenhouse gases resulting from human activity such as fossil fuel burning and deforestation.[2] The IPCC also concludes that variations in
natural phenomena such as solar radiation and volcanic eruptions had a small cooling effect after 1950.[3][4] These basic conclusions have been endorsed by more
than 40 scientific societies and academies of science,[B] including all of the national academies of science of the major industrialized countries.[5]
Climate model projections summarized in the latest IPCC report indicate that the global surface temperature is likely to rise a further 1.1 to 6.4 °C (2.0 to 11.5 °F)
during the 21st century.[2] The uncertainty in this estimate arises from the use of models with differing sensitivity to greenhouse gas concentrations and the use of
differing estimates of future greenhouse gas emissions. Most studies focus on the period leading up to the year 2100. However, warming is expected to continue
beyond 2100 even if emissions stop, because of the large heat capacity of the oceans and the long lifetime of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.[6][7]
An increase in global temperature will cause sea levels to rise and will change the amount and pattern of precipitation, probably including expansion of subtropical
deserts.[8] Warming is expected to be strongest in the Arctic and would be associated with continuing retreat of glaciers, permafrost and sea ice. Other likely effects
include changes in the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events, species extinctions, and changes in agricultural yields. Warming and related changes
will vary from region to region around the globe, though the nature of these regional variations is uncertain.[9]
Political and public debate continues regarding global warming, its causes and what actions to take in response. The available options are mitigation to reduce
further emissions; adaptation to reduce the damage caused by warming; and, more speculatively, geoengineering to reverse global warming. Most national
governments have signed and ratified the Kyoto Protocol aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Contents
[hide]
• 1 Temperature changes
• 2 External forcings
o 2.1 Greenhouse gases
o 2.2 Aerosols and soot
o 2.3 Solar variation
• 3 Feedback
• 4 Climate models
• 5 Attributed and expected effects
o 5.1 Natural systems
o 5.2 Ecological systems
o 5.3 Social systems
• 6 Responses to global warming
o 6.1 Mitigation
o 6.2 Adaptation
o 6.3 Geoengineering
• 7 Debate and skepticism
• 8 See also
• 9 Notes
• 10 References
• 11 Further reading
• 12 External links
Temperature changes
Main article: Temperature record
Two millennia of mean surface temperatures according to different reconstructions, each
smoothed on a decadal scale. The instrumental record and the unsmoothed annual value
for 2004 are shown in black.
Evidence for warming of the climate system includes observed increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice, and
rising global average sea level.[10][11][12][13][14] The most common measure of global warming is the trend in globally averaged temperature near the Earth's surface.
Expressed as a linear trend, this temperature rose by 0.74 ± 0.18 °C over the period 1906–2005. The rate of warming over the last half of that period was almost
double that for the period as a whole (0.13 ± 0.03 °C per decade, versus 0.07 °C ± 0.02 °C per decade). The urban heat island effect is estimated to account for
about 0.002 °C of warming per decade since 1900.[15] Temperatures in the lower troposphere have increased between 0.13 and 0.22 °C (0.22 and 0.4 °F) per
decade since 1979, according to satellite temperature measurements. Temperature is believed to have been relatively stable over the one or two thousand years
before 1850, with regionally varying fluctuations such as the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age.[16]
Estimates by NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies and the National Climatic Data Center show that 2005 was the warmest year since reliable, widespread
instrumental measurements became available in the late 1800s, exceeding the previous record set in 1998 by a few hundredths of a degree.[17][18] Estimates
prepared by the World Meteorological Organization and the Climatic Research Unit show 2005 as the second warmest year, behind 1998.[19][20] Temperatures in
1998 were unusually warm because the strongest El Niño in the past century occurred during that year.[21] Global temperature is subject to short-term fluctuations
that overlay long term trends and can temporarily mask them. The relative stability in temperature from 2002 to 2009 is consistent with such an episode. [22][23]
Temperature changes vary over the globe. Since 1979, land temperatures have increased about twice as fast as ocean temperatures (0.25 °C per decade against
0.13 °C per decade).[24] Ocean temperatures increase more slowly than land temperatures because of the larger effective heat capacity of the oceans and because
the ocean loses more heat by evaporation. [25] The Northern Hemisphere warms faster than the Southern Hemisphere because it has more land and because it has
extensive areas of seasonal snow and sea-ice cover subject to ice-albedo feedback. Although more greenhouse gases are emitted in the Northern than Southern
Hemisphere this does not contribute to the difference in warming because the major greenhouse gases persist long enough to mix between hemispheres.[26]
The thermal inertia of the oceans and slow responses of other indirect effects mean that climate can take centuries or longer to adjust to changes in forcing.
Climate commitment studies indicate that even if greenhouse gases were stabilized at 2000 levels, a further warming of about 0.5 °C (0.9 °F) would still occur.[27]
External forcings
External forcing refers to processes external to the climate system (though not necessarily external to Earth) that influence climate. Climate responds to several
types of external forcing, such as radiative forcing due to changes in atmospheric composition (mainly greenhouse gas concentrations), changes in solar
luminosity, volcanic eruptions, and variations in Earth's orbit around the Sun.[3] Attribution of recent climate change focuses on the first three types of forcing.
Orbital cycles vary slowly over tens of thousands of years and thus are too gradual to have caused the temperature changes observed in the past century.
Greenhouse gases
Greenhouse effect schematic showing energy flows between space, the atmosphere, and
earth's surface. Energy exchanges are expressed in watts per square meter (W/m2).
Recent atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) increases. Monthly CO2 measurements display
seasonal oscillations in overall yearly uptrend; each year's maximum occurs during the
Northern Hemisphere's late spring, and declines during its growing season as plants
remove some atmospheric CO2.
The greenhouse effect is the process by which absorption and emission of infrared radiation by gases in the atmosphere warm a planet's lower atmosphere and
surface. It was discovered by Joseph Fourier in 1824 and was first investigated quantitatively by Svante Arrhenius in 1896.[28] Existence of the greenhouse effect
as such is not disputed, even by those who do not agree that the recent temperature increase is attributable to human activity. The question is instead how the
strength of the greenhouse effect changes when human activity increases the concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
Naturally occurring greenhouse gases have a mean warming effect of about 33 °C (59 °F).[29][C] The major greenhouse gases are water vapor, which causes about
36–70 percent of the greenhouse effect; carbon dioxide (CO2), which causes 9–26 percent; methane (CH4), which causes 4–9 percent; and ozone (O3), which
causes 3–7 percent.[30][31][32] Clouds also affect the radiation balance, but they are composed of liquid water or ice and so have different effects on radiation from
water vapor.
Human activity since the Industrial Revolution has increased the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, leading to increased radiative forcing from CO2,
methane, tropospheric ozone, CFCs and nitrous oxide. The concentrations of CO2 and methane have increased by 36% and 148% respectively since 1750.[33]
These levels are much higher than at any time during the last 650,000 years, the period for which reliable data has been extracted from ice cores.[34][35][36] Less
direct geological evidence indicates that CO2 values higher than this were last seen about 20 million years ago.[37] Fossil fuel burning has produced about three-
quarters of the increase in CO2 from human activity over the past 20 years. Most of the rest is due to land-use change, particularly deforestation.[38]
CO2 concentrations are continuing to rise due to burning of fossil fuels and land-use change. The future rate of rise will depend on uncertain economic,
sociological, technological, and natural developments. Accordingly, the IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios gives a wide range of future CO2 scenarios,
ranging from 541 to 970 ppm by the year 2100 (an increase by 90-250% since 1750).[39] Fossil fuel reserves are sufficient to reach these levels and continue
emissions past 2100 if coal, tar sands or methane clathrates are extensively exploited.[40]
The destruction of stratospheric ozone by chlorofluorocarbons is sometimes mentioned in relation to global warming. Although there are a few areas of linkage, the
relationship between the two is not strong. Reduction of stratospheric ozone has a cooling influence, but substantial ozone depletion did not occur until the late
1970s.[41] Ozone in the troposphere (the lowest part of the Earth's atmosphere) does contribute to surface warming.[42]
Ship tracks over the Atlantic Ocean on the east coast of the United States. The climatic
impacts from aerosol forcing could have a large effect on climate through the indirect
effect.
Global dimming, a gradual reduction in the amount of global direct irradiance at the Earth's surface, has partially counteracted global warming from 1960 to the
present.[43] The main cause of this dimming is aerosols produced by volcanoes and pollutants. These aerosols exert a cooling effect by increasing the reflection of
incoming sunlight. James E. Hansen and colleagues have proposed that the effects of the products of fossil fuel combustion—CO 2 and aerosols—have largely
offset one another in recent decades, so that net warming has been driven mainly by non-CO2 greenhouse gases.[44]
In addition to their direct effect by scattering and absorbing solar radiation, aerosols have indirect effects on the radiation budget.[45] Sulfate aerosols act as cloud
condensation nuclei and thus lead to clouds that have more and smaller cloud droplets. These clouds reflect solar radiation more efficiently than clouds with fewer
and larger droplets.[46] This effect also causes droplets to be of more uniform size, which reduces growth of raindrops and makes the cloud more reflective to
incoming sunlight.[47]
Soot may cool or warm, depending on whether it is airborne or deposited. Atmospheric soot aerosols directly absorb solar radiation, which heats the atmosphere
and cools the surface. In isolated areas with high soot production, such as rural India, as much as 50% of surface warming due to greenhouse gases may be
masked by atmospheric brown clouds.[48] When deposited, especially on glaciers or on ice in arctic regions, the lower surface albedo can also directly heat the
surface.[49] The influences of aerosols, including black carbon, are most pronounced in the tropics and sub-tropics, particularly in Asia, while the effects of
greenhouse gases are dominant in the extratropics and southern hemisphere. [50]
Solar variation
Greenhouse gases and solar forcing affect temperatures in different ways. While both increased solar activity and increased greenhouse gases are expected to
warm the troposphere, an increase in solar activity should warm the stratosphere while an increase in greenhouse gases should cool the stratosphere.[3]
Observations show that temperatures in the stratosphere have been cooling since 1979, when satellite measurements became available. Radiosonde (weather
balloon) data from the pre-satellite era show cooling since 1958, though there is greater uncertainty in the early radiosonde record.[55]
A related hypothesis, proposed by Henrik Svensmark, is that magnetic activity of the sun deflects cosmic rays that may influence the generation of cloud
condensation nuclei and thereby affect the climate.[56] Other research has found no relation between warming in recent decades and cosmic rays.[57][58] A recent
study concluded that the influence of cosmic rays on cloud cover is about a factor of 100 lower than needed to explain the observed changes in clouds or to be a
significant contributor to present-day climate change. [59]
Feedback
Main article: Climate change feedback
Feedback is a process in which changing one quantity changes a second quantity, and the change in the second quantity in turn changes the first. Positive
feedback amplifies the change in the first quantity while negative feedback reduces it. Feedback is important in the study of global warming because it may amplify
or diminish the effect of a particular process. The main positive feedback in global warming is the tendency of warming to increase the amount of water vapor in
the atmosphere, a significant greenhouse gas. The main negative feedback is radiative cooling, which increases as the fourth power of temperature; the amount of
heat radiated from the Earth into space increases with the temperature of Earth's surface and atmosphere. Imperfect understanding of feedbacks is a major cause
of uncertainty and concern about global warming.
Climate models
Main article: Global climate model
The geographic distribution of surface warming during the 21st century calculated by the
HadCM3 climate model if a business as usual scenario is assumed for economic growth
and greenhouse gas emissions. In this figure, the globally averaged warming corresponds
to 3.0 °C (5.4 °F).
The main tools for projecting future climate changes are mathematical models based on physical principles including fluid dynamics, thermodynamics and radiative
transfer. Although they attempt to include as many processes as possible, simplifications of the actual climate system are inevitable because of the constraints of
available computer power and limitations in knowledge of the climate system. All modern climate models are in fact combinations of models for different parts of
the Earth. These include an atmospheric model for air movement, temperature, clouds, and other atmospheric properties; an ocean model that predicts
temperature, salt content, and circulation of ocean waters; models for ice cover on land and sea; and a model of heat and moisture transfer from soil and
vegetation to the atmosphere. Some models also include treatments of chemical and biological processes.[60] Warming due to increasing levels of greenhouse
gases is not an assumption of the models; rather, it is an end result from the interaction of greenhouse gases with radiative transfer and other physical processes.
[61]
Although much of the variation in model outcomes depends on the greenhouse gas emissions used as inputs, the temperature effect of a specific greenhouse
gas concentration (climate sensitivity) varies depending on the model used. The representation of clouds is one of the main sources of uncertainty in present-
generation models.[62]
Global climate model projections of future climate most often have used estimates of greenhouse gas emissions from the IPCC Special Report on Emissions
Scenarios (SRES). In addition to human-caused emissions, some models also include a simulation of the carbon cycle; this generally shows a positive feedback,
though this response is uncertain. Some observational studies also show a positive feedback.[63][64][65] Including uncertainties in future greenhouse gas
concentrations and climate sensitivity, the IPCC anticipates a warming of 1.1 °C to 6.4 °C (2.0 °F to 11.5 °F) by the end of the 21st century, relative to 1980–1999.
[2]
Models are also used to help investigate the causes of recent climate change by comparing the observed changes to those that the models project from various
natural and human-derived causes. Although these models do not unambiguously attribute the warming that occurred from approximately 1910 to 1945 to either
natural variation or human effects, they do indicate that the warming since 1970 is dominated by man-made greenhouse gas emissions.[3]
The physical realism of models is tested by examining their ability to simulate current or past climates.[66] Current climate models produce a good match to
observations of global temperature changes over the last century, but do not simulate all aspects of climate.[38] Not all effects of global warming are accurately
predicted by the climate models used by the IPCC. For example, observed Arctic shrinkage has been faster than that predicted.[67]
Natural systems
Sparse records indicate that glaciers have been retreating since the early 1800s. In the
1950s measurements began that allow the monitoring of glacial mass balance, reported to
the WGMS and the NSIDC.
Global warming has been detected in a number of systems. Some of these changes, e.g., based on the instrumental temperature record, have been described in
the section on temperature changes. Rising sea levels and observed decreases in snow and ice extent are consistent with warming.[14] Most of the increase in
global average temperature since the mid-20th century is, with high probability,[D] atttributable to human-induced changes in greenhouse gas concentrations. [70]
Even with current policies to reduce emissions, global emissions are still expected to continue to grow over the coming decades.[71] Over the course of the 21st
century, increases in emissions at or above their current rate would very likely induce changes in the climate system larger than those observed in the 20th century.
In the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, across a range of future emission scenarios, model-based estimates of sea level rise for the end of the 21st century (the
year 2090-2099, relative to 1980-1999) range from 0.18 to 0.59 m. These estimates, however, were not given a likelihood due to a lack of scientific understanding,
nor was an upper bound given for sea level rise. Over the course of centuries to millennia, the melting of ice sheets could result in sea level rise of 4-6 m or more.
[72]
Changes in regional climate are expected to include greater warming over land, with most warming at high northern latitudes, and least warming over the Southern
Ocean and parts of the North Atlantic Ocean.[71] Snow cover area and sea ice extent are expected to decrease. The frequency of hot extremes, heat waves and
heavy precipitation will very likely increase.
Ecological systems
In terrestrial ecosystems, the earlier timing of spring events, and poleward and upward shifts in plant and animal ranges, have been linked with high confidence to
recent warming.[14] Future climate change is expected to particularly affect certain ecosystems, including tundra, mangroves, and coral reefs.[71] It is expected that
most ecosystems will be affected by higher atmospheric CO2 levels, combined with higher global temperatures.[73] Overall, it is expected that climate change will
result in the extinction of many species and reduced diversity of ecosystems.[74]
Social systems
There is some evidence of regional climate change affecting systems related to human activities, including agricultural and forestry management activities at
higher latitudes in the Northern Hemisphere.[14] Future climate change is expected to particularly affect some sectors and systems related to human activities.[71]
These include:
• Water resources in some dry regions at mid-latitudes, the dry tropics, and areas
that depend on snow and ice melt
• Agriculture in low latitudes
• Low-lying coastal systems
• Human health in populations with limited capacity to adapt to climate change
It is expected that some regions will be particularly affected by climate change, including the Arctic, Africa, small islands, and Asian and African megadeltas. Some
people, such as the poor, young children, and the elderly, are particularly at risk, even in high-income areas.
Mitigation
Mitigation of global warming is accomplished through reductions in the rate of anthropogenic greenhouse gas release. The world's primary international agreement
on reducing greenhouse gas emissions, the Kyoto Protocol, now covers more than 160 countries and over 55 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions.[76] As of
February 2010, only the United States, historically the world's largest emitter of greenhouse gases, has refused to ratify the treaty. The treaty expires in 2012.
International talks began in May 2007 on a future treaty to succeed the current one.[77] The 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference met in Copenhagen
in December 2009 to agree on a framework for climate change mitigation. [78] No binding agreement was made.
There has also been business action on climate change, including efforts to improve energy efficiency and limited moves towards use of alternative fuels. In
January 2005 the European Union introduced its European Union Emission Trading Scheme, through which companies in conjunction with government agree to
cap their emissions or to purchase credits from those below their allowances. Australia announced its Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme in 2008. United States
President Barack Obama has announced plans to introduce an economy-wide cap and trade scheme.[79]
Adaptation
Geoengineering
In 2007–2008 Gallup Polls surveyed 127 countries. Over a third of the world's population was unaware of global warming, with people in developing countries less
aware than those in developed, and those in Africa the least aware. Of those aware, Latin America leads in belief that temperature changes are a result of human
activities while Africa, parts of Asia and the Middle East, and a few countries from the Former Soviet Union lead in the opposite belief.[105] In the Western world,
opinions over the concept and the appropriate responses are divided. Nick Pidgeon of Cardiff University finds that "results show the different stages of
engagement about global warming on each side of the Atlantic"; where Europe debates the appropriate responses while the United States debates whether
climate change is happening.[106]
Debates weigh the benefits of limiting industrial emissions of greenhouse gases against the costs that such changes would entail.[75] Using economic incentives,
alternative and renewable energy have been promoted to reduce emissions while building infrastructure.[107][108] Organizations such as the libertarian Competitive
Enterprise Institute, conservative commentators, and companies such as ExxonMobil have challenged IPCC climate change scenarios, funded scientists who
disagree with the scientific consensus, and provided their own projections of the economic cost of stricter controls.[109][110][111][112] Environmental organizations and
public figures have emphasized changes in the current climate and the risks they entail, while promoting adaptation to changes in infrastructural needs and
emissions reductions.[113] Some fossil fuel companies have scaled back their efforts in recent years,[114] or called for policies to reduce global warming.[115] Many
studies link population growth with emissions and the effect of climate change.[116][117][118]
Some global warming skeptics in the science or political communities dispute all or some of the global warming scientific consensus, questioning whether global
warming is actually occurring, whether human activity has contributed significantly to the warming, and the magnitude of the threat posed by global warming. [citation
needed]
Further reading
• Association of British Insurers (2005–06) (PDF). Financial Risks of Climate
Change.
http://www.climatewise.org.uk/storage/610/financial_risks_of_climate_change.pdf.
• Barnett, TP; Adam, JC; Lettenmaier, DP; Adam, J. C.; Lettenmaier, D. P. (2005-
11-17). "Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-
dominated regions" (abstract). Nature 438 (7066): 303–309.
doi:10.1038/nature04141. PMID 16292301.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v438/n7066/abs/nature04141.html.
• Behrenfeld, MJ; O'malley, RT; Siegel, DA; Mcclain, CR; Sarmiento, JL;
Feldman, GC; Milligan, AJ; Falkowski, PG et al.; et al. (2006-12-07). "Climate-
driven trends in contemporary ocean productivity" (PDF). Nature 444 (7120): 752–
755. doi:10.1038/nature05317. PMID 17151666.
http://www.icess.ucsb.edu/~davey/MyPapers/Behrenfeld_etal_2006_Nature.pdf.
• Choi, Onelack; Fisher, Ann (May 2005). "The Impacts of Socioeconomic
Development and Climate Change on Severe Weather Catastrophe Losses: Mid-
Atlantic Region (MAR) and the U.S.". Climate Change 58 (1–2): 149–170.
doi:10.1023/A:1023459216609.
http://www.springerlink.com/content/m6308777613702q0/.
• Dyurgerov, Mark B.; Meier, Mark F. (2005) (PDF). Glaciers and the Changing
Earth System: a 2004 Snapshot. Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research Occasional
Paper #58. ISSN 0069-6145.
http://instaar.colorado.edu/other/download/OP58_dyurgerov_meier.pdf.
• Emanuel, K (2005-08-04). "Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over
the past 30 years." (PDF). Nature 436 (7051): 686–688. doi:10.1038/nature03906.
PMID 16056221. ftp://texmex.mit.edu/pub/emanuel/PAPERS/NATURE03906.pdf.
• Hansen, James; et al. (2005-06-03). "Earth's Energy Imbalance: Confirmation
and Implications" (PDF). Science 308 (5727): 1431–1435.
doi:10.1126/science.1110252. PMID 15860591.
http://pangea.stanford.edu/research/Oceans/GES205/Hansen_Science_Earth's
%20Energy%20Balance.pdf.
• Hinrichs, Kai-Uwe; Hmelo, Laura R.; Sylva, Sean P. (2003-02-21). "Molecular
Fossil Record of Elevated Methane Levels in Late Pleistocene Coastal Waters".
Science 299 (5610): 1214–1217. doi:10.1126/science.1079601. PMID 12595688.
• Hirsch, Tim (2006-01-11). "Plants revealed as methane source". BBC.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4604332.stm.
• Hoyt, Douglas V.; Schatten, Kenneth H. (1993–11). "A discussion of plausible
solar irradiance variations, 1700–1992". Journal of Geophysical Research 98 (A11):
18,895–18,906. doi:10.1029/93JA01944. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-
bib_query?
bibcode=1993JGR....9818895H&db_key=AST&data_type=HTML&format=&high=
448f267ff303582.
• IME. "Climate Change: Adapting to the inevitable" (PDF). IMechE.
http://www.imeche.org/NR/rdonlyres/FA401F02-3193-4A19-826A-
3FEEFB89DEDE/0/ClimateChangeAdaptationReportIMechE.pdf. Retrieved 2009-
03-07.
• Karnaukhov, A. V. (2001). "Role of the Biosphere in the Formation of the
Earth’s Climate: The Greenhouse Catastrophe" (PDF). Biophysics 46 (6).
http://avturchin.narod.ru/Green.pdf.
• Kenneth, James P.; et al. (2003-02-14). Methane Hydrates in Quaternary
Climate Change: The Clathrate Gun Hypothesis. American Geophysical Union.
https://www.agu.org/cgi-bin/agubooks?book=ASSP0542960.
• Keppler, Frank; et al. (2006-01-18). "Global Warming – The Blame Is not with
the Plants". Max Planck Society.
http://www.mpg.de/english/illustrationsDocumentation/documentation/pressReleases
/2006/pressRelease200601131/index.html.
• Lean, Judith L.; Wang, Y.M.; Sheeley, N.R. (2002–12). "The effect of increasing
solar activity on the Sun's total and open magnetic flux during multiple cycles:
Implications for solar forcing of climate" (abstract). Geophysical Research Letters 29
(24): 2224. doi:10.1029/2002GL015880.
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002GeoRL..29x..77L.
• Lerner, K. Lee; Lerner, K. Lee; Wilmoth, Brenda (2006-07-26). Environmental
issues: essential primary sources. Thomson Gale. ISBN 1414406258.
• Muscheler, Raimund, R; Joos, F; Müller, SA; Snowball, I; et al. (2005-07-28).
"Climate: How unusual is today's solar activity?" (PDF). Nature 436 (7012): 1084–
1087. doi:10.1038/nature04045. PMID 16049429.
http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/ccr/raimund/publications/Muscheler_et_al_Nature2005.pdf.
• Oerlemans, J. (2005-04-29). "Extracting a Climate Signal from 169 Glacier
Records" (PDF). Science 308 (5722): 675–677. doi:10.1126/science.1107046.
PMID 15746388. http://www.cosis.net/abstracts/EGU05/04572/EGU05-J-04572.pdf.
• Oreskes, N (2004-12-03). "Beyond the Ivory Tower: The Scientific Consensus
on Climate Change" (PDF). Science 306 (5702): 1686. doi:10.1126/science.1103618.
PMID 15576594. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/reprint/306/5702/1686.pdf.
• Purse, BV; Mellor, PS; Rogers, DJ; Samuel, AR; Mertens, PP; Baylis, M; et al.
(February 2005). "Climate change and the recent emergence of bluetongue in
Europe" (abstract). Nature Reviews Microbiology 3 (2): 171–181.
doi:10.1038/nrmicro1090. PMID 15685226.
http://www.nature.com/nrmicro/journal/v3/n2/abs/nrmicro1090_fs.html.
• Revkin, Andrew C (2005-11-05). "Rise in Gases Unmatched by a History in
Ancient Ice". The New York Times.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/25/science/earth/25core.html?
ei=5090&en=d5078e33050b2b0c&ex=1290574800&adxnnl=1&partner=rssuserland
&emc=rss.
• Ruddiman, William F. (2005-12-15). Earth's Climate Past and Future. New
York: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-7167-3741-8.
http://www.whfreeman.com/ruddiman/.
• Ruddiman, William F. (2005-08-01). Plows, Plagues, and Petroleum: How
Humans Took Control of Climate. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-
691-12164-8.
• Solanki, SK; Usoskin, IG; Kromer, B; Schüssler, M; Beer, J; et al. (2004-10-23).
"Unusual activity of the Sun during recent decades compared to the previous 11,000
years." (PDF). Nature 431 (7012): 1084–1087. doi:10.1038/nature02995.
PMID 15510145. http://cc.oulu.fi/%7Eusoskin/personal/nature02995.pdf.
• Solanki, Sami K.; et al. (2005-07-28). "Climate: How unusual is today's solar
activity? (Reply)" (PDF). Nature 436: E4–E5. doi:10.1038/nature04046.
http://cc.oulu.fi/%7Eusoskin/personal/sola_nature05.pdf.
• Sowers, Todd (2006-02-10). "Late Quaternary Atmospheric CH4 Isotope Record
Suggests Marine Clathrates Are Stable". Science 311 (5762): 838–840.
doi:10.1126/science.1121235. PMID 16469923.
• Svensmark, Henrik; et al. (2007-02-08). "Experimental evidence for the role of
ions in particle nucleation under atmospheric conditions". Proceedings of the Royal
Society A (FirstCite Early Online Publishing) 463 (2078): 385–396.
doi:10.1098/rspa.2006.1773.(online version requires registration)
• Walter, KM; Zimov, SA; Chanton, JP; Verbyla, D; Chapin Fs, 3rd; et al. (2006-
09-07). "Methane bubbling from Siberian thaw lakes as a positive feedback to
climate warming". Nature 443 (7107): 71–75. doi:10.1038/nature05040.
PMID 16957728.
• Wang, Y.-M.; Lean, J.L.; Sheeley, N.R. (2005-05-20). "Modeling the sun's
magnetic field and irradiance since 1713" (PDF). Astrophysical Journal 625: 522–
538. doi:10.1086/429689.
http://climatesci.colorado.edu/publications/pdf/Wang_2005.pdf. Retrieved from
"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming"
Views
• Article
• Discussion
• View source
• History
Personal tools
• Try Beta
• Log in / create account
Navigation
• Main page
• Contents
• Featured content
• Current events
• Random article
Search
Go Search
Interaction
• About Wikipedia
• Community portal
• Recent changes
• Contact Wikipedia
• Donate to Wikipedia
• Help
Toolbox
Languages
• Afrikaans
• Anglo-Saxon
• العربية
• Aragonés
• বাংলা
• Bân-lâm-gú
• Беларуская
• Беларуская (тарашкевіца)
• Bosanski
• Български
• Català
• Cebuano
• Česky
• Cymraeg
• Dansk
• Deutsch
• Eesti
• Ελληνικά
• Español
• Esperanto
• Euskara
• فارسی
• Français
• Furlan
• Gaeilge
• Gàidhlig
• Galego
• 한국어
• Հայերեն
• िहन्दी
• Hrvatski
• Bahasa Indonesia
• Interlingua
• Íslenska
• Italiano
• עברית
• Basa Jawa
• ಕನನಡ
• ქართული
• Kiswahili
• Latina
• Latviešu
• Lietuvių
• Magyar
• Македонски
• മലയാളം
• मराठी
• مصرى
• Bahasa Melayu
• Монгол
• Nederlands
• 日本語
• Norsk (bokmål)
• Norsk (nynorsk)
• Occitan
• Polski
• Português
• Română
• Rumantsch
• Русский
• Саха тыла
• සිංහල
• Simple English
• Slovenčina
• Slovenščina
• Српски / Srpski
• Srpskohrvatski / Српскохрватски
• Basa Sunda
• Suomi
• Svenska
• Tagalog
• தமிழ
• తలుగు
• ไทย
• Тоҷикӣ
• Türkçe
• Українська
• Tiếng Việt
• Võro
• 文言
• Winaray
• 吴语
• יִידיש
• 粵語
• Žemaitėška
• 中文