Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1. Circle/highlight correct report descriptor in the first bar (ex. Lateral loads)
2. Acknowledgements in this template are regarded as an indication of authors’ recognition of
team members’ contribution towards the final project outcome.
3. Table 1 indicates authorship, partnership and direct contribution, as a percentage, of your
immediate sub-team partner. (ex. If report marks to be shared evenly indicate 50% in front of
each name. If all the work done by the author, with no measurable contribution from the
partner, then indicate “Individual”)
4. Table 2 indicates the remaining team members from other sub teams you wish to
acknowledge who works tirelessly in spirit and effort to make the project a success throughout
the semester. Number them in order. You may number 1 (most recognisable) to 4 (least
recognisable) - assuming 6 in a group. In situations where equal recognition is needed you
may give same ranking for more than one person. (ex. 1, 1, 2, 2)
5. If all team members have really contributed in all aspects, the team is a dream team,
colleagues are of the highest calibre, a treat to work with in a project this scale, and then
obviously you do not want to take anything away from them. The natural outcome would be -
50%, 50%, 1, 1, 1, 1 - for a group of six in all four reports.
Report Descriptor
TITANIA TOWER
PROPOSAL
CIVE1163 – Long Span &High Rise Structures
Department of Civil & Infrastructure Engineering, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University,
Melbourne, Australia
A proposal report submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Bachelor of Civil &
Infrastructure Engineering; under the supervision of Dr. Saman De Silva
Panha Kruoch
The wind load design calculations are based on finding the displacement of the structure due to the
wind loads, and the stress analysis of the structure’s core box.
These calculations conformed to AS/NZS 1170.2 – 2011 (wind actions). There are also coincided with
AS/NZS 1170.0 – 2002 (general principles of structures), where this code contributes in calculating
the wind forces. The AS 1170.0 provides the probability for serviceability and ultimate loads, and the
importance level for the designing structure. AS 1170.2 shows the wind pressure and force, for
ultimate and serviceability loads.
In the case of earthquake load design, the requirement for the structure design is to make an
equivalent static analysis. The outcome of this analysis will provide the vertical distribution (at each
level of the structure) of horizontal forces. The analysis is taken from AS 1170.4 – 2007 (Earthquake
actions in Australia). The analysis is in Section 6 of the code, where the necessary values and factors
are given to fulfill the condition of the design.
The robustness load design calculations are conformed to AS/NZS 1170.0 – 2002 (general principles
of structures). It can be found in Section 6 of the AS code. The calculations are meant to do
displacement analysis for robustness load for the structure.
‘Space Gass’ computer program was implemented to make deflection analysis and stress analysis in
the structure. The analyses are done for all lateral loads action on the structure in two critical
directions, which are N-S and W-E directions. From the analyses, the most severe/critical load action
on the structure was adopted to construct the stress diagram. In finding the most critical lateral load
action of the structure, the highest deflection on the structure by the specific lateral force will then
govern for lateral load. Then, the stress analysis based on the governed lateral load will then be
made. The stresses thus provide the sufficiency to calculate the required number of reinforcement
bars for the structure.
The table below shows the summary of the steps taken to achieve the desired lateral load design for
the building structure with respect to the Australian Standards codes.
Where:
Regional gust wind speed, in meters per second, for annual probability of exceedence of 1/R
Wind directional multipliers for the 8 cardinal directions (β)
Terrain / height multiplier
Shielding multiplier
Topographic multiplier
(Table 3.1) (Table 3.2) (Table 4.1 (A)) (Clause 4.3) (Clause 4.4)
SLS 37 m/s
N–S 0-30m Cat 3, Building is on
No shielding
W–E 30-210 Cat 1 the flat ground
ULS 46 m/s
Table 3 Site Wind Speed, for Serviceability and Ultimate Limit State
The linear interpolation method is used to calculate the intermediate values of height (z). The result of
‘Site Wind Speed of the Structure’ is given as Table A in the Appendix.
Wind Pressure Calculation (AS/NZS 1170.2:2011)
Where:
Design wind pressure in Pascal’s
Density of air, which shall be taken as 1.2 kg/m^3
Building orthogonal design wind speeds (taken as )
Aerodynamic shape factor
Dynamic response factor (taken as 1)
Where:
External pressure coefficient
Net pressure coefficient acting normal to the surface
Combination factor applied to external pressures
Area reduction factor
Local pressure factor
Proofs cladding reduction factor
Surface
0.8 1 0.9 1 1
W 0.72
(Table 5.2 (A)) (Table 5.4) (Table 5.5) (Table 5.6) (Table 5.8)
-0.5 1 0.9 1 1
L -0.45
(Table 5.2 (B)) (Table 5.4) (Table 5.5) (Table 5.6) (Table 5.8)
Therefore,
[ ]
[ ] (Eq. 1.0)
The ‘Ultimate and Serviceability Pressure’ for each level of the structure are found by using ‘equation
1.0’. The summary of the pressures are given in Table B, in the Appendix.
The wind forces were calculated using ‘equation 2.0’. The pressure values taken from Table B were
used to calculate the wind forces for both cases at each level. The summary of the wind forces for
both cases calculated were given in the Appendix, as Table C and D. Figures 1 and 2 shown the
height of the structure against the wind forces for each case.
6.2.3
(
Table 6.4
(Assume Class Rock, Period = 3.5 seconds)
6.2.2
[ ]
6.3 Check Vertical Distribution of Horizontal Forces
6.3.1
6.3.2
k = 2.0 where
n = 60 (Number of floors in the structure)
j = 1, 2, 3 … 60.
The ‘Earthquake Base shear’ was calculated using the formula taken from Clause 6.2.1 from AS
1170.4 – 2007 code. The calculations for vertical distribution of horizontal forces of the structure were
then made. The forces for each level are shown in the Appendix as Table F. These distributed
horizontal forces were then used to calculate the displacement of the structure due to earthquake load
in Space Gass program.
3. DEFLECTION CHECK
Core Boxes Dimensions
There are three core boxes, given as A, B & C. The arrangement is in such a way all three are
positioned 120 degrees with one another, from the middle floor plate. The distance for each core
boxes to the center of the plate is 5643mm, as stated above in the diagram. All core boxes have the
same dimensions and thickness.
From the figure 1 analysis on N-S direction, the highest displacement recorded on the top floor of the
structure was -111.5mm in Z-direction. For figure 2 analysis on W-E direction, highest displacement
recorded was 173.01mm in X-direction. These high displacement values can be found at core box A.
From the figure 5 & 6 shown, the highest displacement due to robustness force in N-S direction is -
0.21mm in Z-direction. For W-E direction, the highest displacement recorded was 0.29mm in X-
direction. The analysis was done on the top floor of the structure.
The displacement due to wind forces will govern the design for lateral load as the displacements in
both directions are high. Thus, the stress analysis for lateral load design will be made based on
‘Ultimate Limit’ wind forces.
4. STRESS ANALYSIS
The stress analysis was done in two directions, which are N-S and W-E directions. The most critical
core box was analyzed, which is core box A. In this case, the ‘Ultimate Limit’ wind force was chosen
to make the stress analysis as it governs among the lateral forces. The wind force was used to do
stress analysis in both directions. The basic combination for the ultimate limit states use in the
checking strength shall be as follows, where the long-term and combination factors are given in Table
4.1 (AS/NZS 1170.0: 2002).
Core Wall 1
Core Wall 2
Note: At the ground floor, the self-weight is taken as the total self-weight of core wall
st
At the 21 level, the self-weight is taken as two third of the total self-weight of the core wall
st
At the 41 level, the self-weight is taken as one third of the total self-weight of the core wall
In order to find the total floor loads, the average floor area for each three zones have to be chosen. It
was found by choosing the closest floor level to the calculated average floor area. In the case of zone
1 (level 1-20), the average floor area was level 11. Thus the floor load calculations were based on that
floor, e.g. tributary areas for tension and compression sides for both core walls. For zone 2, the floor
used was level 24. For zone 3, the floor used was level 44 of the structure.
Level 1 – 21
Note: There are also shear wall marked in purple color from level 1-20 so the gravity load of the
structure is shared between core-wall and the shear wall. Thus, the tributary area for tension and
compression are roughly halved as marked in the diagram.
Level 21 – 40
Level 41 – 60
Note: At the ground floor, the floor area is the sum of all average tributary area for all levels.
st
At the 21 level, the floor area is the sum of the average tributary area from L21-60.
st
At the 41 level, average tributary area runs from L41-60.
Total P-value
The average self-weight (G) of the floor is equal to 13kPa (Provided from gravity sub-team)
The average live load (Q) of the floor is equal to 3kPa (Provided from gravity sub-team)
Tension side
Compression side
Floor Load (Core Wall 1) (kN) Floor Load (Core Wall 2) (kN)
Floor Level Tension Compression Tension Compression
0.9G x A (1.2G+0.4Q) x A 0.9G x A (1.2G+0.4Q) x A
At the ground floor 64,654 88,511 39,923 49,378
At the 21st Floor 52,580 82,247 32,786 43,989
At the 41st Floor 28,384 44,323 16,403 22,666
P/A Calculation
Core Wall 1
Core Wall 1
At the ground
114,631 9.25 12.39 124,391 5.24 23.74
Floor
st
At the 21
85,898 9.25 9.29 106,166 5.24 20.26
Floor
At the 41st
31,926 9.25 3.11 18,225 5.24 3.48
Floor
Core Wall 2
Core Wall 2
At the ground
65728 5.35 12.29 100989 8.49 11.90
Floor
st
At the 21
49989 5.35 9.34 78396 8.49 9.23
Floor
At the 41st
15739 5.35 2.94 22592 8.49 2.66
Floor
In the North – South direction the core wall will be bending over Z-axis
In the diagram above, the two core walls are labeled with A, B, C and D. The labeling was done to
give better view or explanation for the calculations.
Tension stress is calculated from dividing bending moment by the elastic section moduli (Z zz) at the
tension side. In this case, it is ‘Z zz – A’.
(Eq. 3)
Compression stress is calculated from dividing bending moment by the elastic section moduli (Z zz) at
the tension side. In this case, it is ‘Z zz – B’.
(Eq. 4)
Table 14 Ultimate Wind Stress
From the results above, it is shown that the highest tension stress is 16MPa on Core Wall 1. Also, the
highest compression stress calculated was 26.6MPa located on Core Wall 2.
Core Wall 1
Tension Negative (-)
Compression Positive (+)
Table 15 Net Stress Core Wall 1 (N-S)
Core Wall 2
Tension Negative (-)
Compression Positive (+)
Table 16 Net Stress Core Wall 2 (N-S)
Core Wall 1
The total self-weight of core box 1 is 85,430kN
The tension side is 65% of the total core wall area
Core Wall 2
The total self-weight of core box 2 is 71,681kN
The tension side is 40% of the total core wall area
Level 1-20
Note: Shear walls are located from level 1 – 20. Thus, the gravity load is shared between core walls
and shear walls.
Level 21-40
Total P-value
The average self-weight (G) of the floor is 13kPa (Provided by gravity load sub – team)
The average live load (Q) of the floor is 3kPa (Provided by gravity load sub-team)
Tension side
Compression side
Floor Load (Core Box 1) (kN) Floor Load (Core Box 2) (kN)
Floor Level Tension Compression Tension Compression
0.9G x A (1.2G+0.4Q) x A 0.9G x A (1.2G+0.4Q) x A
At the Ground
57798 83290 37346 53753
floor
st
At the 21 Floor 51480 74096 32152 46276
st
At the 41 Floor 28080 40416 16076 23138
Table 20 Total P-Value Core Wall 1&2 (W-E)
Calculate P/A
Core Wall 1
Core Wall 1
Floor Tension Compression
Level
Self-Weight Gross-Area P/A Self-Weight Gross-Area P/A
(kN) (m2) (MPa) (kN) (m2) (MPa)
At the ground
96242 7.16 13.44 124391 7.16 15.23
Floor
At the 21st
77109 7.16 10.77 106166 7.16 11.96
Floor
At the 41st
19132 7.16 2.67 18225 7.16 3.27
Floor
Core Wall 2
Core Wall 2
At the ground
65728 5.35 10.07 100989 8.49 11.63
Floor
At the 21st
49989 5.35 7.76 78396 8.49 8.8
Floor
At the 41st
15739 5.35 2.31 22592 8.49 2.83
Floor
4.2.2 Ultimate Wind Stress Calculations (W-E)
Space Gass Data
In the West – East direction the core wall will be bending over Z-axis
Tension stress is the result of bending moment divide by the elastic section moduli (Zyy) at the tension
side in this case is Zyy – A.
(Eq. 5)
Compression stress is the result of bending moment divide by the elastic section moduli (Zzz) at the
tension side in the case is Zzz – B.
(Eq. 6)
Core Wall 1
Tension Negative (-)
Compression Positive (+)
Core Wall 2
Tension Negative (-)
Compression Positive (+)
Therefore,
Therefore,
In the vertical direction, of not less than the larger of 0.0015 and the value required for the strength
(Clause 11.7.1 (a))
There for
Design for
Using two grids reinforcement because the wall thickness is greater than 200mm
Using two grids reinforcement because the wall thickness is greater than 200mm
(Clause 11.7.3) AS (3600) – 2009
Level Wind Pressure Area Force Level Wind Pressure Area Force
(Pa) (m2) (kN) (Pa) (m2) (kN)
L1 588 230 135.35 L31 1429 128 182.86
L2 588 230 135.35 L32 1432 126 180.45
L3 588 230 135.35 L33 1435 124 177.92
L4 659 230 151.46 L34 1437 120 172.50
L5 707 230 162.70 L35 1442 120 173.03
L6 764 230 175.83 L36 1445 180 260.18
L7 794 225 178.62 L37 1448 107 154.95
L8 834 225 187.62 L38 1451 117 169.74
L9 896 220 197.07 L39 1454 116 168.71
L10 1072 218 233.60 L40 1457 114 166.10
L11 1214 215 260.96 L41 1460 114 166.41
L12 1318 211 278.04 L42 1462 116 169.64
L13 1324 196 259.53 L43 1466 176 258.09
L14 1331 175 232.84 L44 1468 124 182.06
L15 1336 200 267.30 L45 1470 118 173.41
L16 1343 195 261.95 L46 1471 120 176.51
L17 1348 190 256.21 L47 1473 121 178.20
L18 1355 186 252.10 L48 1474 123 181.31
L19 1361 182 247.62 L49 1475 126 185.90
L20 1367 177 242.04 L50 1477 136 200.84
L21 1373 173 237.46 L51 1478 119 175.89
L22 1381 240 331.51 L52 1480 202 299.03
L23 1388 155 215.18 L53 1482 136 201.57
L24 1393 151 210.42 L54 1483 139 206.21
L25 1399 147 205.61 L55 1485 142 210.85
L26 1404 143 200.77 L56 1487 145 215.56
L27 1411 140 197.54 L57 1488 149 221.71
L28 1416 124 175.62 L58 1489 152 226.38
L29 1422 134 190.49 L59 1491 155 231.13
L30 1426 198 282.34 L60 1493 144 214.92
Table D Wind Force (ULS)
Level Wind Pressure Area Force Level Wind Pressure Area Force
(Pa) (m2) (kN) (Pa) (m2) (kN)
L1 588 230 135.35 L31 1429 128 182.86
L2 588 230 135.35 L32 1432 126 180.45
L3 588 230 135.35 L33 1435 124 177.92
L4 659 230 151.46 L34 1437 120 172.50
L5 707 230 162.70 L35 1442 120 173.03
L6 764 230 175.83 L36 1445 180 260.18
L7 794 225 178.62 L37 1448 107 154.95
L8 834 225 187.62 L38 1451 117 169.74
L9 896 220 197.07 L39 1454 116 168.71
L10 1072 218 233.60 L40 1457 114 166.10
L11 1214 215 260.96 L41 1460 114 166.41
L12 1318 211 278.04 L42 1462 116 169.64
L13 1324 196 259.53 L43 1466 176 258.09
L14 1331 175 232.84 L44 1468 124 182.06
L15 1336 200 267.30 L45 1470 118 173.41
L16 1343 195 261.95 L46 1471 120 176.51
L17 1348 190 256.21 L47 1473 121 178.20
L18 1355 186 252.10 L48 1474 123 181.31
L19 1361 182 247.62 L49 1475 126 185.90
L20 1367 177 242.04 L50 1477 136 200.84
L21 1373 173 237.46 L51 1478 119 175.89
L22 1381 240 331.51 L52 1480 202 299.03
L23 1388 155 215.18 L53 1482 136 201.57
L24 1393 151 210.42 L54 1483 139 206.21
L25 1399 147 205.61 L55 1485 142 210.85
L26 1404 143 200.77 L56 1487 145 215.56
L27 1411 140 197.54 L57 1488 149 221.71
L28 1416 124 175.62 L58 1489 152 226.38
L29 1422 134 190.49 L59 1491 155 231.13
L30 1426 198 282.34 L60 1493 144 214.92
Table E (G & Q for EQ loads calculations)
V = 1474 kN