Presented to the Faculty of the

Department of Civil Engineering

College of Engineering, De La Salle University

LBYCVT4
STAAD VERIFICATION
MANUAL VERIFICATION
BEAM AND COLUMN
2 STOREY RC BUILDING

SUBMITTED BY:
GRIMARES, ANDREW DUSTIN L.
11022345
Loading Considered:

Parameters of Column and Beam Dimensions:

Beam analysis:

Beam number 334 verification in RC Building,

Consider Following parameters in Design:

From STAAD Output:

Manual Verification of Beam:

⁄
⁄

Steel Ratio = ⁄

Steel Ratio (bal.) = ⁄ ( ⁄ )

UNDER REINFORCED:

( ⁄ )
( ⁄ )

Shear verification:

Torsion Verification:

Acp = 400 x 400 = 120000 mm2

Pcp = 2(400) + 2(400) = 1600 mm
Tu = √

X=
Y=

0.00119 < 2.65; PASSED

Tn =
Tu = 0.75 x Tn = 16.91 KN – m ; PASSED

Column Analysis:
Column 133

Concrete Density = 23.6 KN/m3

Column height = 4.0 m

Pu = 182.35 KN
Mu = 132.37 KN-m

Calculations:

d = 550 mm
d’ = 50 mm
d’’ = 250 mm

Number of bars = 20 bars

As =
As minimum = 0.01 x Ag = 3600 mm2
As maximum = 0.08 x Ag = 28800 mm2

Ypc = 300 mm
Cb =
a = 0.85 x 325.44mm = 276.63 mm

fs’ = 600 x

Strength of Concrete = 276.63 x 0.85 x 28 x 600=3950.28 KN

Strength of Steel = 3141.59 mm2 x 414 Mpa = 1300.62 KN
Tension = 3141.59 mm2 x 414 = 1300.62 KN
Pb = 3950.28 KN
Pub = 2567.68 KN
Mb = 1289.79 KN
Mub = 838.37 KN

K = 0.85
Φ = 0.65
Pu = 0.65 x 0.85 x 28 x (600 x 600 -6283.19) + 6283.19 x 415
Puo = 7166.89 KN
Pu- max = 0.85 x 7166.89 = 6091.19 KN
Mu-max = 738.97 KN m

Flexure:
P=0
( )

Mu = 500.64 KNm
Summary:
In analysis of the usage of STAAD pro v8i, several beams and columns were chosen with respect
to the needed verification. We are able to determine the accuracy of the STAAD results with respect to
the manual verification needed to solve such parameters of a beam or column.

The given parameters were given as follows based on the plan given by the professor. From
STAAD, the sections were designed based on the code used in STAAD which is the ACI code. The table
mentioned above represents the beams of different lengths given and it is also categorized based on the
floor plan in each level.

In the Given flexural computations of Beam 334 in which it has dimensions of 400 x 400 with a
length of 6 meters, the manual verification together with the STAAD verification displays comparatively
relative values with respect to some minor errors based on calculations. The shear verification also was
accurate and it is based on the number of shear reinforcements that were used in the given beam. The
moment was also computed based on the number of shear reinforcement and also in order to solve the
Nominal moment of the given building. In the Torsional verification of the project, it can be seen that the
value from the manual verification and the STAAD values were somehow consistent and it would appear
that there were no errors concerning the design of the particular beam. Overall the values passed the
section given in STAAD as that of the manual computations and also with respect to the National
Structural Code of the Philippines (NSCP). The values are also somehow comprehensive of somehow
greater than the projected values of STAAD but the section were satisfied because the values were not
lacking in terms of values.
 Column 133 on the other hand with the dimensions of 600 x 600 with a column height of 4.0 m
was verified based on its interaction diagram where in which the following order of formulated
computations were followed as stated by the NSCP.
The following parameters of the beam including the axial force and the Moment flexural values
were calculated in the formula given from the design of columns. With respect to the computed assumed
values of the columns, the dimensions of the columns were given as follows and would serve as the input
values for the structural file of the STAAD structure of RC building.

Column Tributary No of Dead Live

ID B H Area Floors Load Load Pu Ag
C-1 6.5 3.075 19.9875 3 5.03 4.8 822445.7 25182.05
C-2 3.5 3.075 10.7625 3 5.03 4.8 442855.4 13559.56
C-3 5.875 4.725 27.759375 3 5.03 4.8 1142243 34973.75
C-4 3.5 4.725 16.5375 3 5.03 4.8 680485.1 20835.43
C5 6.5 4.725 30.7125 3 5.03 4.8 1263758 38694.36
C-3A 6 2.875 17.25 3 5.03 4.8 709803 21733.1
C5A 4.818 4.725 22.76505 3 5.03 4.8 936736.3 28681.45
C6 6 4.725 28.35 3 5.03 4.8 1166546 35717.88
C6A 6.5 4.525 29.4125 3 5.03 4.8 1210266 37056.51
Min
B Width fc 28
158.6885 300 fy 414
116.4455 300
187.0127 300
144.3448 300
196.7088 300
147.4215 300
169.356 300
188.9917 300
192.5007 300

In note of the given project, proposed replacement of materials used are advised so that the costs
would be minimal and also it would be efficient for engineers to think of alternative ways in solving for
the STAAD computations based on a particular plan. The overall computations are mentioned above the
Summary where in which it would state the section given and also the different parameters of the given
sections of the beam and column.
RC building:
(COLUMN 133 and BEAM 334 ANALYSIS)
Flexure Output:
SHEAR AND TORSION Results:
Column Output Results (AXIAL + BENDING):