Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
APRI
AP
PRI
R L/
L/MA
MAY 2
20
2010
010
10
VOLUME
V
VO
VOLU
OLLU
UME
ME 2
28
8 NU
N
NUMBER
UM
MBBER
BEER
R2
Backfilling
depleted open-pit mines
Geotextile tube oil-pipe
foundations in Tabasco
Innovative bio-enabled
nanoparticle composites
New round-strand
geonet structure
Subscribe at www.geosyntheticsmagazine.com
10 ON THE COVER
A good example of
an active, open-pit
On Site 28
mine with surround-
ing waste piles, tailing
10 Backfill depleted open-pit mines with
impoundment, and lined landfills, tailings, and heap leach pads
leach pad facilities. By Allan Breitenbach
See page 10.
19 New round-strand innovation in
biplanar geonet structure
By Dhani Narejo and Mengjia Li
www.geosyntheticsmagazine.com | Geosynthetics 3
46 Panorama
Residents want geotextile tubes for beach protection
Delaware students win 2010 GeoChallenge
L.A. may require stormwater capture
48 Geo-Frontiers Watch
Read about Geo-Frontiers 2011 education and
trade show offerings, plus supporting organizations
and organizing committee
53 Calendar
55 Ad Index
Final Inspection
56 Final Inspection
56 9th International Conference on Geosynthetics
Geosynthetics ISSN #0882 4983, Vol. 28, Number 2 is published bimonthly by Industrial Fabrics Circulation Specialist, Geosynthetics , 1801 County Road B W, Roseville, MN 55113-4061 Phone
Association International, 1801 County Road B W, Roseville, MN 55113-4061. Periodicals Postage 800 225 4324 or +1 651 222 2508, fax +1 651 631 9334 e-mail: subscriptions@ifai.com. 1-year
Paid at Minneapolis, MN and at additional mailing offices. Postmaster: send address changes USA $59, Canada and Mexico $69, all other countries $99, payable in U.S. funds (includes air
to Geosynthetics, County Road B W, Roseville, MN 55113-4061. Return Undeliverable Canadian mail postage). Reprints: call +1 651 225 6917, mjmoore@ifai.com. Back Issues: call 800 225 4324,
Addresses to Station A, PO Box 54, Windsor, ON N9A 6J5. Orders and changes contact: A Lo, www.ifaibookstore.com.
T
his issue of Geosynthetics is the perfect opportunity for some GMA, USA
long-overdue thank-yous to the many contributors to this Sam R. Allen
TRI/Environmental, USA
magazine, in particular the 25 Editorial Advisory Committee
Richard J. Bathurst
members listed on the right side of this page. Royal Military College, Canada
What a group, indeed! In this issue alone, there are five excellent Witty Bindra
articles contributed by members of this committee. Several others Permathene Pty. Ltd., Australia
contributed peer reviews and editing suggestions. David A. Carson
U.S. EPA, USA
And all told over the years, every name you see over there has con-
Daniele A. Cazzuffi
tributed time and content and advice for this magazine: writing, editing, CESI S.p.A., Italy
reviewing, collecting photos, answering technical questions, providing Oscar R. Couttolenc
sound counsel, and often, their personal friendship. GMA, Mexico
A sincere thanks to each one of you. Ronald K. Frobel
R.K. Frobel & Associates, USA
Stephan M. Gale
Gale-Tec Engineering Inc., USA
Another good friend of Geosynthetics magazine, Bob Holtz, delivered Han-Yong Jeon
a wonderful Terzaghi Lecture during ASCE’s GeoFlorida in February. INHA University, Korea
(See our on-site blog from Bob’s SRO presentation at: Robert M. Koerner
The Geosynthetic Institute, USA
www.geosyntheticsmagazine.com/posts/blog/523.)
Robert E. Mackey
During the lecture, titled “Reinforced soil technology: From experi- S2L Inc., USA
mental to the familiar,” Bob reminisced, he thanked colleagues past and Kent von Maubeuge
present, and recalled the work of his friends, teachers, and students. In NAUE GmbH, Germany
conclusion, he offered provocative questions regarding the current and Jacek Mlynarek
SAGEOS, Canada
future state of geosynthetics and geotechnical engineering.
Dhani Narejo
Very well done, Bob, and congratulations! Caro Engineering LLC, USA
Roy J. Nelsen
ErosionControlBlanket.com Inc., USA
city of Guarujá, about 90km from São Paulo, the largest city in Brazil. Marco A. Sánchez
ML Ingeniería, Mexico
For more information: www.9icg-brazil2010.info.
Mark E. Smith
RRD International, USA
L. David Suits
NAGS, USA
Gary L. Willibey
ESP/SKAPS Industries, USA
Ron Bygness
Aigen Zhao
Editor, Geosynthetics magazine Syntec Corp., USA
+1 651 225 6988
*The Editorial Advisory Committee reviews selected papers,
rwbygness@ifai.com case histories, and technical editorial copy in its areas
of expertise. Individual advisors do not review every
submission. Statements of fact and opinion are the author’s
responsibility alone, and do not imply the viewpoints
of Geosynthetics, its Editorial Advisory Committee, editors,
Geosynthetics is an international, bimonthly publication for civil engineers, or the association.
contractors and government agencies in need of expert information on geo-
synthetic engineering solutions. Geosynthetics presents articles from field
professionals for innovative, exemplary practice.
ASSOCIATE PUBLISHER
Susan R. Niemi
srniemi@ifai.com
IRRIGATION
RESERVOIRS
CANALS
EDITOR
Ron Bygness
rwbygness@ifai.com
ADVERTISING
ACCOUNT COORDINATOR
Shelly Arman
searman@ifai.com
{ Pr
Prou
oud
d to be
be Pa
P rt of th
thee Ov
Over
eral
alll So
Solu on }
lutition
Inno
Innova
vati
tive
ve p
pro
roje
ject
ctss re
requ
quir
ire
e in
inno
nova
vati
tive
ve p
pro
rodu
duct
cts,
s, llik
ike
e
CIRCULATION MANAGER
Mary Moore Fire
Fi r st
reston
one
e Ge
Geom
omem
embr
bran
anes
es.. Th
Thee du
dura
rabi
bilility
ty a
and
nd e
ela
la
ast
stic
icit
ityy of our
mjmoore@ifai.com p od
produc
ucts
ucts,, ev
even
en in ex
expo
pose
sed
d ap
appl
plic
icat
atio
ions
ns,, co
comb
mbin
ined
ed w
wit
ith
h ou
ourr ex
expe
pert
pertis
rtise,
is e,,
e
CIRCULATION SPECIALIST h lp e
he ens
nsur
uree th
the
e su
succ
cces
esss of e
es eve
ven
n th
the
e mo
ost d
dem
eman
an
ndi
ding
ng p
pro
ro
oje
ect
cts.
s.
A Lo
subscriptions@ifai.com
To lea
learn
rn mor
mo e abou
aboutt geom
geomemb
embran
ranee solu
solutio
tions
ns fro
fromm Fire
Firesto
stone
ne Spe
Specia
cialty
lty
ty Prro
odu
uctss
INDUSTRIAL FABRICS 80 -42
80
800 -4 8-4
8-4442
442 l iinfo
nfo@fir
@firest
estone
one
n sp.
sp.com
com l w
www.
ww.fire
firesto
stones
nesp.c
p om/
p.c om/ifa
ifa
fai7
fa i7
7
ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL
1801 County Road B W.,
Roseville, MN 55113-4061, USA Visit us at booth #41 at the 2010 International Conference on Geosynthetics
+1 651 222 2508, 800 225 4324 (U.S. and Canada only)
Fax +1 651 631 9334
Website www.ifai.com
www.geosyntheticsmagazine.com | Geosynthetics 7
DEM ECH
®
Pro-Wedge VM-20
Wedge Welder Pro-Seam
Pr
ro Seam
m Modell 110
110-0100/A
10 010
100/
0//A
Wedge Welder
T-0100/A Tensiometer
Pro-X Model 600-0100/A
Extrusion Welder
Services Inc.
DEMTECH Services, Inc. • P.O. Box 2165, Placerville, CA 95667 • 6414 Capitol Ave., Diamond Springs, CA 95619
www.demtech.com • 888-324-WELD (9353) • 530-621-3200 • Fax 530-621-0150 • demodave@demtech.com
ABSTRACT
L
andfills, tailings impoundments, and heap leach pads are the
largest and highest geomembrane-lined fill structures in the
world. These lined structures require large areas for storage
and containment of solid wastes, precious or base metal mill waste
tailings, and ore heap fill materials.
Today, municipal waste landfills are considering the use of de-
pleted open-pit mines in remote areas to allow for more efficient
use of nearby city land space and natural resources. Lined tailings
impoundments and leach pads could also be located within depleted
mine pit excavations for reduced overall mine site disturbance.
This article discusses the recent historic use and primary engi-
neering concerns and benefits in lining, backfilling, and operating
depleted open-pit mine excavations for containment of solid waste,
tailings, and ore heap fills.
Introduction
The major mine disturbance areas related to open-pit operations
include the excavated mine pit limits, the surrounding mine waste
dump piles from overburden (non-ore) stripping excavations, and
the tailings impoundment or heap leach facilities.
Tailings impoundments and leach pads are typically lined. A partial
or complete backfilling of any depleted mine pit areas with these lined
facilities, where practical, would significantly decrease the overall mine
disturbance areas resulting in lower reclamation costs at closure. The
post-mining backfill of open-pit mine excavations with lined solid waste
landfills is a relatively new concept as well, beginning in the late 1990s.
The steep pit wall excavation slopes and the natural groundwater
conditions above the mine pit bottom limits are the two greatest
engineering design challenges to consider in lining and backfilling
an open-pit mine excavation. Recently, several mine pits have been
lined and backfilled for solid waste landfill and tailings impound-
ment slurry disposal operations. Lined mine pit heap leach designs
have been considered in the past; however, there are no known lined
Allan Breitenbach, P.E., is a
mine pit heaps being constructed currently. An example of an active geotechnical engineer based in
open-pit mine with surrounding waste piles, tailing impoundment, the Golden, Colo., office of Vector
and leach pad facilities is shown in Photo 1. Engineering Inc.
www.geosyntheticsmagazine.com | Geosynthetics 11
This article will present case history examples of recent lined and Lined landfills for mine pit backfill
backfilled mine pits for solid waste landfill and tailings impoundment Lined landfill operations in the 1980s
disposal, as well as the general engineering design considerations for included numerous excavated cells con-
potential backfilling of lined mine pits for waste disposal and ore heap structed below ground level and lined with
leach operations. a geomembrane liner, a clay soil liner, or
a combination of both geomembrane and
clay liner as a composite liner system for
Case histories of lined facilities in mine pits the disposal of solid wastes.
History Excavated slopes were generally flat-
Open-pit mines have historically been left in an open condition during tened as required for placement of the
operations to closure, unless unstable wall conditions warranted partial compacted low permeability clay soil liner.
backfilling to complete the pit ore excavations. The excavated cell side slopes were steep-
In some cases, the pit bottom limits were partially backfilled to above ened in the 1990s to present day, where
the natural groundwater level, where practical, to prevent ponding of geosynthetic clay liners (GCL) began to be
water at closure or to stabilize waste dump slopes around the pit wall accepted as an equivalent or better replace-
limits. Most open-pit walls are constructed to a safety factor of 1.0 to ment to the clay soil liner. A steepened
extract as much ore from the ground with the least amount of stripping GCL and geomembrane lined valley wall
to expose the ore body. slope with a flatter conventional clayey soil
The backfilling of mine pits with lined landfills, tailings impound- and liner at the base of the steep slope are
ments, and heap leach pads, where practical, would significantly re- shown in Photo 2.
duce the mine disturbance area and related reclamation closure costs. The first abandoned open-pit mine
In addition, mine pit backfilling makes efficient use of the excavated quarry excavation to be lined and back-
storage space with full facility containment within the natural ground filled with municipal solid waste was the
vs. constructing above-ground dams, site grading fills, and diversion Bristol Landfill in Bristol, Va. The open-pit
channels for facility containment. Known case histories of lined mine quarry included near vertical bedrock walls
pit facilities by this author are presented in this section. more than 300ft (100m) high. A mine pit
haul road ramp extended from the mine
pit rim to the pit bottom for truck access
and removal of excavated rock materials,
until the mine operations ended some-
time before 1990. The mine pit quarry was
converted to a lined landfill operation by
1998, as shown in Photo 3.
The near vertical rugged rock quarry
pit walls were the most extreme engineer-
ing challenge known to date for placement
of a geomembrane liner system. The rock
walls were pre-scaled of loose rock debris
and covered with safety wire mesh screen
in 1996 and 1997 to prevent rock falls dur-
ing liner construction and to anchor the
liner system. A layer of geotextile fabric
and HDPE geomembrane liner were placed
on the lower pit side walls with plans to
extend the pit wall liner upward in phases
to maintain fully lined conditions above
PHOTO 2 Steep valley wall lined with composite geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) and geomembrane
the rising active landfill surface. The mine
and valley floor being prepared with conventional compacted clayey soil liner in preparation for
geomembrane liner installation. pit floor was backfilled with a low perme-
www.geosyntheticsmagazine.com | Geosynthetics 13
clayey mine waste materials were taken from local mine stripping operations downhill of the lined pad limits for grav-
to expose the deeper ore materials. The El Valle tailings impoundment at ity leach solution drainage to an external
startup of tailings disposal operations is shown in Photo 5. A conventional lined process pond sump.
above-ground, lined tailings impoundment is shown in Photo 6. Since the 1984 test pad construction,
The clayey site grading fill in the mine pit bottom limits allowed for no known lined and backfilled mine pit
dry construction liner installation above the existing or dewatered mine leach pads have been constructed at the
pit ground water levels. Sufficient compacted clayey subgrade fill was bottom of depleted open-pit mine excava-
placed adjacent to the steep pit walls at startup to allow for perimeter tions. However, several copper mines in
access roads and future lined tailings impoundment expansion raises. New Mexico and Arizona are considering
A woven geotextile fabric was placed between the geomembrane this option, particularly where mine condi-
liner and the clayey rock and soil subgrade to cushion the liner from tions indicate it is economic to construct
puncture on the occasional larger, cobble-sized rocks. The tailings im- for both operations and closure.
poundment liner consisted of a 60-mil (1.5-mm) HDPE liner. Tailings
disposal within the geomembrane lined impoundment commenced in
2005 with conventional slurry tailings disposal. Liner design considerations
for in-pit backfilling
Lined leach pads for mine pit backfill General
This author is aware of only one lined mine pit leach pad operation, Primary engineering concerns in lining,
to date, that was constructed within the open-pit limit. The lined pad backfilling, and operating a depleted open-
was constructed in 1984 on a relatively small scale as a pilot test pad in pit mine for containment of waste fill or
southwestern New Mexico, USA. According to mine personnel, the test ore heap materials include:
pad was located in a depleted side pit wall bench area within a larger • installation and protection of the liner
copper mine pit limit and lined with 80-mil (2.0- mm) HDPE liner. below natural groundwater conditions.
The geomembrane liner was covered with about 5 million tons • stabilizing any steep pit rock wall slopes
of low-grade run-of-mine ore dump fill and included sufficient area that are near a safety factor of 1.
PHOTO 5 Lined tailings impoundment for startup conventional tailings slurry disposal within a
depleted open pit gold mine in northern Spain.
TenCate Geosynthetics is the innovative provider focused on delivering the right solution for
Mirafi® HP
a variety of environmental problems. As the world’s leading source of geosynthetic
materials, we will develop, manufacture, and provide specific solutions for your project.
One of the most difficult challenges engineers worldwide face is the measurement of a
product’s separation capacity. Now, TenCate accurately quantifies separation by calculating
the Separation Factor.
And, proper separation and reinforcement can now be fulfilled simultaneously through the
use of only one layer of a High-Performance polypropylene geotextile. Mirafi® HP High-Performance Geotextiles offer an excellent balance of high-
tensile strength at low strains for reinforcement, very good hydraulic properties that facilitate filtration and drainage, and high Separation Factors.
For a detailed copy of the Separation Factor methodology, please check out our “Tech Note” section at www.mirafi.com or email separationfactor@
tencate.com.
At TenCate Geosynthetics, we find solutions for your soil separation and reinforcement problems, protecting you from the dangers you don’t see…
like bad road conditions caused by weak and failing subgrades.
Think TenCate. TenCate Geosynthetics increases performance, reduces costs, and enables your company to achieve what was once unachievable.
For more information call 1-800-685-9990, or visit www.mirafi.com.
www.geosyntheticsmagazine.com | Geosynthetics 15
Major benefits of backfilling with a lined facility: ment, waste biodegradation, and methane
• overall reduction in required liner area for storage gas collection (Breitenbach and Thiel,
of materials. 2005). This may require multiple cells
• minimal risk of spills with the elimination of above- and graded gravity flow to sump-pump
ground containment dams and watershed diversions collection locations at the bottom of the
(particularly in high seismic earthquake zones). landfill for recirculation throughout the
• significant reduction in overall mine disturbance areas life of the facilities.
for less reclamation and closure costs. Landfill liner systems prefer dry
The in-pit liner containment becomes more practical ground conditions with deep ground-
and cost effective if included early in the operation plans water levels for no direct connection and
to allow use of nearby stripped mine waste materials for transport of any leachate contamination
bottom pit site grading preparation and steep pit wall away from the lined facilities. Therefore,
stabilization for liner placement. most open-pit mines would require some
The tailings impoundments and leach pad facili- type of continuous groundwater dewater-
ties are generally associated with open-pit mining op- ing and monitoring system beneath an
erations and located in in-pit liner or the option of mine waste
Open-pit mines have seen recent use of close proximity to the site grading fill to raise the liner subgrade
excavated mine pit and above the seasonal high natural ground-
the below-ground excavation limits for stripped non-ore mine water level conditions.
storage of solid waste landfill, tailings, waste pile limits. As the In general, lined solid waste landfill
and ore heap leach fills. open-pit mine is devel- for in-pit backfill includes the following
oped, some mine sites major engineering concerns:
have depleted open-pit • dry and graded subgrade conditions
ore zone pockets or multiple open-pit sites in close prox- beneath the liner system with separate
imity to each other that may be amenable to lining and drainage cells as required.
backfilling for tailings disposal or ore heap leaching. • stable mine pit walls for liner stability and
The overall steep pit wall slopes of 35–55 degrees safe access to dispose of waste materials.
with benches in most hard rock mining operations create • protection of the liner system from differ-
an engineering challenge for liner systems. Waste rock ential subgrade settlement or puncture.
materials from continued mine overburden stripping • protection of the liner system from over-
operations can provide economic site grading fill to lying waste material placement and punc-
stabilize the floor and pit walls for dry geomembrane ture with adequate bottom and side wall
liner installation with the liner system protecting the drain fill or geotextile cover.
underlying groundwater conditions. • minimizing hydraulic heads on the bot-
The pit wall stability would continue to improve, as tom liner system with a leachate collection
lined backfill operations buttress and bury the exposed and recirculation sump pump system.
mine pit wall slopes. Each type of geomembrane lined • designing deep sump well systems with
facility has differing engineering concerns. redundancy and protection of the liner
from the “pile driving effect” of verti-
Lined landfill for in-pit backfill cal well down-drag forces during waste
Municipal solid waste landfills typically require a robust settlement (side wall wells along the liner
multiple liner system for leachate containment, collection, slope are optional).
and recovery operations. A drain fill cover and daily solid
waste soil cover or temporary synthetic geotextile cover Lined tailings impoundment
are common for solid waste disposal. for in-pit backfill
Beginning 10-15 years ago, landfills are applying Lined tailings impoundment may include
irrigated water or recirculated leachate flows to the top storage of several types of tailings waste
surface or by deep well injection to accelerate settle- materials: conventional slurry disposal
www.geosyntheticsmagazine.com | Geosynthetics 17
GEOCELLS
TO U G H OV E R T I M E
For more than 25 years, Typar® Geotextiles have been used in paved and unpaved
roads and surfaces, drainages, waste handling systems, erosion control and landfills
to separate and reinforce, while filtering soil particles and letting water pass freely.
Now we’ve moved into another dimension with new Typar® Geocells, a cellular
confinement system excellent for sediment and erosion control, flood control and
soil stabilization.
Tough Over Time, Typar Geotextiles help preserve the original design and the
design life of the system.
Background
T
he primary design property of drainage geocomposites is flow rate
or transmissivity, which is measured in the laboratory according
to ASTM D4716. The laboratory value is used to calculate the
allowable flow rate according to GRI procedure GC8. The compressive
creep of the polymeric core of the drainage geocomposite (i.e., geonet)
along with long-term clogging must be considered when calculating the
allowable flow rate. The expression that considers all these variables is
as follows (per GRI GC8):
q100
qall = (1)
RF cr xRF cc x RF bc
after (θ2) and before (θ1) compression is a cubic function of the thick-
Mengjia Li, Ph.D., is a drainage product manager
ness after (t2) and before (t1) compression. at GSE Lining Technology Inc.
www.geosyntheticsmagazine.com | Geosynthetics 19
P
= – 0.028 · 1n(t) + 0.68 (3)
S
www.geosyntheticsmagazine.com | Geosynthetics 21
For over 130 years, Maccaferri has been controlling the forces of erosion and retaining the
earth’s soil. We’ve learned a lot since 1879 and apply that knowledge to every product and
every project.
We offer multiple solutions for base and slope reinforcement. Our extensive line of geogrids
and turf reinforcement mats provide outstanding performance in reliability and quality at an
exceptional value.
Maccaferri strives to provide a cost effective and dependable solution to every project. We
can help you save time and money.
www.geosyntheticsmagazine.com | Geosynthetics 25
obtain a factor of safety of 0.59 against used as a tool to gain understanding of the
the structural failure of the geonet. As nature of the geonets rather than selection
such, the geonet under consideration is or rejection of a particular geonet.
not adequate. The procedure illustrates well that the
Alternatively, the geonet in Figure 5(b) long-term structural capacity of conven-
with round strand or another material tional biplanar geonets is significantly
with high compression strength can be lower than the peak strength. Designing
considered for this project. these materials close to their peak strength
may lead to a strand layover during the
service life.
Limitations of the
structural design procedure
The procedure for calculating the factor Summary
of safety against structural failure of con- Conventional biplanar geonets have strands
ventional oblong-strand biplanar geonets that are oblong shaped. In a compression
presented in previous sections is based on test, the oblong strands result in a stress-
laboratory creep testing. strain curve with a distinct peak. At this
During the creep tests, peak, there is a sudden collapse of the
A new type of round-strand the geonet test specimen strands followed by significant strain or
is sandwiched between compression with constant stress or even
biplanar geonet shows no plates; in the field, the with a drop in stress.
rollover of the strands. boundary conditions can The stress at which rollover occurs is
be geotextile (bonded or known as peak strength or rollover strength
unbonded), geomembrane (smooth or of biplanar geonets. Not all geonets have the
textured), and soil (cohesive or nonco- rollover of the strands. In fact, a new type
hesive with a filter geotextile). The steel- of round-strand biplanar geonet shows no
geonet boundary conditions represent the rollover of the strands.
geonet-geomembrane interface very well. A procedure for structural design of
This interface is not common in landfill conventional oblong-strand biplanar geo-
base liner systems. nets was presented in this article. This
To the author’s knowledge, there has procedure was based on creep testing of
been no published information on the biplanar geonets.
effect of the boundary conditions on the The use of this procedure ensures that
creep of geonets. Creep tests in isolation the maximum stress on a biplanar geonet
(between steel plates) are simple to perform is lower than the stress at which structural
and are often the only tests for which any failure would occur over the design life
data is available. of the drainage geocomposite. The creep
It is possible that the soil-geocomposite data shows that the allowable compres-
interface would prevent the layover of the sive stress on an oblong-strand biplanar
strands. In that case the procedure presented geonet should be much lower than its peak
here is conservative but may significantly compressive strength.
underpredict the structural capacity of
conventional biplanar geonets.
Until additional information on the ef-
fect of the boundary conditions is available,
the procedure presented here should be
References
ASTM D 4716, Test Method for Determining the
(In-Plane) Flow Rate per Unit Width and Hydraulic
Transmissivity of a Geosynthetic Using a Constant Head.
www.geosyntheticsmagazine.com | Geosynthetics 27
ABSTRACT DBPM
»»
N
I
n this project, geotextile tube technology is adopted as part
of an integral solution for beach erosion problems at the Dos
Bocas marine facilities for Petroleos Mexicanos (PEMEX). TABASCO
The solutions designed consisted of:
• geotextile tubes (GT) filled with sand working as beds for oil
conduction pipes that were previously in risk of col-
lapsing due to sand foundations lost within
the surf zone (see photos, left).
• installation of a submerged breakwater
using GT along 1.9km of coastline.
• installation of 62,000m3 of beach nour-
ishment for coastline stabilization.
This article describes elements of the
design criteria and installation process, field
survey data before and after beach profiles
comparison and graphical material is presented,
and analysis corroborating natural beach recovery
after breakwater installation. Post-construction evidence
is also given, leading to the conclusion that this project has
worked as expected, ensuring long-term oil conduction and stor-
FIGURE 1 Project site location
age facility integrity.
www.geosyntheticsmagazine.com | Geosynthetics 29
Submerged breakwater
The submerged breakwater was designed
to achieve two main objectives: to reduce
the incident wave energy on the beach by
controlling the wave-breaking process,
thus promoting natural sand accumu-
.2.0!
Ë.#
.0 =0#!Ë.#20#!. lation shoreward of the structure; and
PRESTO
VË7j~jÍ?Í
to perform as a confining element for
Appleton, Wisconsin, USA
Ph: 800-548-3424; 1-920-738-1336 VË#ÄÍjË~~Áj~?Íj
beach nourishment.
E: info@prestogeo.com VË?ÁaÁÁË
WÁjÍj
Under this premise, the primary re-
www.prestogeo.com quirement for an efficient submerged tube
cross-section design was to define the crest
Original GEOWEB® VË ?ajËËÍjË2.ËwÁËÏåËßj?ÁÄ
high, in relation to the still water level
Call for FREE Preliminary Design Analysis
AP-5993
(SWL), for all tide ranges since “this would
et al., 2006).
The breakwater cross section design
(Figure 4) was built with a 7.8m-circum- 0.5-1
? H2 0.3 (min)
ference principal GT seamed to a 2.5m- 0.3 (min)
? H1
long scour apron and to a smaller GT that 1.8
1-1.5
works as an anchor tube (1.4m-circumfer- 1.8 SEA BOTTOM
ence). Given the principal GT’s proposed
3
dimensions that, when filled with sand to GEOTEXTILE TUBE
SEA BOTTOM
its 90% capacity, would reach a 1-1.25m GEOTEXTILE TUBE
height (Leshchinsky et al., 2006). Based on FIGURE 3 Designed sections: (a) gap <1m; (b) gap >1m
this criterion, the submerged breakwater
was placed at a 1-1.25m depth, ensuring
structure crest would coincide with mean
low water level (LWL). Chimney (Filling Port)
D=0.4m
Beach nourishment
1.0m
The beach fill profile was designed to reach
3.8m
0.10m above the high water level (HWL).
D=0.4m
As depicted in Figure 5, material would 2
MexicoPipeFigs.indd 3/18/10 11:22:35 AM
1.0m
the beach by 30-40m after wave action D=0.2m
profile stabilization.
An important issue for beach nourish-
ment success is that the material artificially 4.0m
placed has the same, or larger, grain size Length of Scour Apron = 2.5m
Circumference = 7.8m ± 10cm
and density as the natural beach mate- Circumference strength = Geotextile Tensile Strength of CD
rial (USACE, 2004). This was ensured by Anchor Tube
Circumference = 1.4m ± 10cm
dredging material from offshore submarine
FIGURE 4 Breakwater cross section
banks 400m offshore that were previously
monitored and authorized by federal en-
vironmental authorities.
Installation process 30 to 40 m
BEACH NOURISHMENT PROFILE
Preliminary work before GT installation HWL
consisted of removing from the sea floor LWL
anything that could be a threat to GT in-
≈1.25 m
tegrity (stone, steel, debris, etc.).
During the GT sand filling process,
stresses in the encapsulating geosynthetic
MexicoPipeFigs.indd 1 3/18
due to slurry pumping pressure was an STABILIZED P.GT SCOUR APRON ANCHOR GT
BEACH PROFILE
issue because overpressure during filling
of the tubes may cause geotextile failure FIGURE 5 Beach nourishment designed profile
(Leshchinsky, et al., 1996). This job was
carried out with 4-in. discharge-diameter
slurry pumps with volume discharge rates
up to 40-50m3/hr with 10–30% of solids.
www.geosyntheticsmagazine.com | Geosynthetics 31
MexicoPipeFigs.indd 3 3/18/10 11:22:36 AM
(a) (b)
Figure 6 shows slurry-pumping op-
erations for both the GT support ele-
ments and breakwaters. Pumped mate-
rial was obtained from submarine banks
50-70m offshore.
Once GT installation was finished,
beach nourishment continued using a
12-in.-diameter suction dredge, with
volume discharge rates up to 250m3/hr.
FIGURE 6 Filling GT tasks: (a) pipe support elements and (b) breakwater Material was conducted to shore by a 10-
in. flexible hose (Figure 7).
The total fill volume required to reach
the profile level designed along seven proj-
ect sections was approximately 62,000m3.
Performance
Installation of pipe support elements con-
cluded by the end of July 2009.
Figures 8 and 9 show before-and-af-
ter comparisons. In some cases, gaps had
reached 2.5m. The photos also show the
GT’s flexibility and adaptation to marine
FIGURE 7 Beach nourishment activities
media—key points for this project’s success,
giving complete support where required.
As for breakwater performance, Figure
10 shows the wave-breaking concept due
to GT presence, creating a wave energy
reduction zone, with turbulence generated
shoreward inducing sand accumulation.
During the breakwater installation pro-
cess, beach evolution profile surveys were
done for all sections, corroborating that the
structure was performing as expected, pro-
moting natural sand accumulation shore-
FIGURE 8 Before-and-after comparison for pipe 3 ward of the structure (Figure 11).
Beach fill construction clearly enhanced
project performance, providing additional
stability to the shoreline and the support
elements for the oil-conduction pipes.
And as the breakwater continues to reduce
longshore transport rates and minimizes
end losses, it will ensure the lifespan of
service for this facility (Figure 12).
WAVE ENERGY
LWL
REDUCTION ZONE
Distance offshore
FIGURE 12 Final situation for section 7 FIGURE 11 Beach profile evolution after breakwater installation: (a) Section 1, (b) Section 7
www.geosyntheticsmagazine.com | Geosynthetics 33
Using a bio-enabled
approach to produce
nanoparticle composites
By John Toon
www.geosyntheticsmagazine.com | Geosynthetics 35
serve as reducing agents. We don’t add any chemicals that “If we combine gold-binding and silver-
could be toxic to the protein.” binding peptides, we can make composites
Use of these mild processing conditions could re- that will include a mixture of gold and
duce the cost of producing the composites and their silver nanoparticles,” says Kharlampieva.
potential environmental impact. When dried, the “Each particle will have its own proper-
resulting silk-nanoparticle film has ties, and combining them will create more
This bio-enabled, high tensile strength, high elasticity, interesting composite materials.”
surface-mediated and toughness. The researchers also hope to find ad-
“Silk is almost as strong as Kevlar, ditional applications for the films in such
approach mimics
but it can be deformed by 30% without areas as photovoltaics, medical technology,
the growth and breaking,” says Tsukruk. “The silk and anti-microbial films that utilize the
assembly processes film is very robust, with a compli- properties of silver nanoparticles.
of natural materials. cated structure that you don’t find in Beyond Tsukruk and Kharlampieva,
synthetic materials.” the research team has included Dmitry
For the future, the researchers plan to use the bio- Zimnistky, Maneesh Gupta, and Kathryn
assisted, surface-mediated technique to produce nano- Bergman of Georgia Tech, David Kaplan
particles from other metals. They also hope to combine of the Department of Biomedical Engi-
different types of particles to create new optical and neering at Tufts University, and Rajesh
mechanical properties. Naik of the Materials and Manufacturing
Directorate of the U.S. Air Force Research
Laboratory at Wright-Patterson Air Force
Base in Ohio.
americanwick.com
“Nanomaterials grown under environ-
WE’RE HERE mentally friendly conditions can be as good
TO COLLECT… as synthetic materials that are produced
A
ful materials under natural conditions.”
merican Wick Drain provides proven, engineered, highly
cost effective alternatives to pipe and stone AWD Provides Solutions for: Source: Research Horizons Summer/Fall 2009 • Vol.
systems. If you are looking for a more efficient way to collect, t VERTICAL WALLS
26, No. 3
transport and redirect water… AWD has the answer. We’re not just t BRIDGE ABUTMENTS Contact: Vladimir Tsukruk, +1 404 894 6081, vladimir@
t CUT-OFF AND TRENCH DRAINS mse.gatech.edu G
down to earth, we’re… Focusing our Sites on Gaining Ground.
t RETENTION/DETENTION PONDS
Pages 38-40 include selections from Geosynthetics encourages your contributions of case histories, photos, and field tips.
“Green roof design and installation” For submittal guidelines, contact Ron Bygness at 800 225 4324 or +1 651 225 6988;
by Angie Durhman, TectaAmerica, e-mail: rwbygness@ifai.com; www.geosyntheticsmagazine.com
angie@greenroof.com Photos courtesy of TectaAmerica (p. 38, p. 40 top-left and bottom)
Photos courtesy of Roofscapes Inc. (p. 39 top, p. 40 top-right)
PROVIDE PRODUCE
NATURAL LIGHT ELECTRICITY
TO THE INTERIOR
AESTHETICALLY MANAGE
PLEASING STORMWATER
OUTDOOR SPACE COLLECT RAINWATER
FOR REUSE
ROOT BARRIER
WATERPROOF MEMBRANE
www.geosyntheticsmagazine.com | Geosynthetics 39
American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA) headquarters in Chicago City Hall: Approximately 14,000 ft.3 of geofoam was used
Washington, D.C.: This roof was designed to maximize stormwater to create the illusion of a rolling terrain.
management and species diversity.
Solutions that
article
the price of 1
Name ___________________________________________________________
Company ________________________________________________________
Address__________________________________________________________
City _____________________________________________________________
Fax _____________________________________________________________
❑ $179 $99 /2 Years Other Int'l (U.S. funds)
Email ____________________________________________________________
❏ Bill me
❏ Check Enclosed $ ___________________
Type of Business (please check): Title (please check):
❏ Credit Card Payment ❍ Visa ❍ Master Card ❍ Amex ❍ Discover ❑ Engineering Firm / ❑ Owner/Corporate executive
Engineer in Private Practice ❑ Chief/Staff Engineer
Card Number ____________________________________________________
❑ Contractor ❑ Geotechnical Engineer
Expire Date ______________________________________________________
❑ Geosynthetic Installer ❑ Civil Engineer
Card Holder Name _______________________________________________
❑ Installation/Fabrication ❑ Research/Development
Signature _________________________________ Date __________________ Equipment Supplier Professional
❑ Geosynthetic Producer/Distributor ❑ Other (please specify)
Fax: +1 651-631-9334 Phone: 800-208-6129
❑ Other (please specify) _______________
Mail: IFAI, SDS-12-2108, PO Box 86, Minneapolis, MN 55486-2108 _______________
Offer ends December 31, 2010. Please allow 4-6 weeks for shipment of first issue.
Offer valid for new subscribers only.
0310GEOsubform.indd 411
0410GS_p28-45.indd 3/19/10
3/26/10 8:10:12
8:44:15 AM
Questions and Answers from the GMA Techline
Niall,
You have two things going against you in your situation:
thickness differences and material differences. Regarding
TECHLINE
the thickness situation, 1mm is difficult not to overgrind
in order to have the extrudate placed upon it. You will
need to put your best personnel on this task. It is difficult
The Geosynthetic Materials Association (GMA) offers the but possible.
GMA Techline, a resource for technical questions about
geosynthetics. E-mail: gmatechline@ifai.com for fast, Regarding the material differences, LLDPE has a broader,
free, direct answers to your technical questions. GMA and somewhat lower, melting window than HDPE, but
serves as the central resource for information regarding they do overlap considerably. In this regard, wedge weld-
geosynthetics and provides a forum for consistent and ing of the two different resins is more difficult than extru-
accurate information to increase the acceptance, and to sion welding. I don’t think this is as much a problem as is
promote the correct use, of geosynthetics. dealing with the thinner sheet. Clearly, many trial (or test)
strips will be necessary on your project.
You also ask what would be an acceptable extrusion weld.
If you go to our website at www.geosynthetic-institute.org
under “specifications” and look at GRI-GM19 you will find
that 1.5mm HDPE requires 525N in shear and 340N in peel.
Conversely, the thinner and weaker 1mm LLDPE requires
263N in shear and 250N in peel.
Niall, I am afraid that all you can ask for in this case is the
lower values associated with the 1.0mm LLDPE.
GMA Techline
www.geosyntheticsmagazine.com | Geosynthetics 43
Matt,
Moving upslope, we have the passive wedge as a buttress. It is not a
big item unless you go into a tapered cover soil scenario. That said,
there is no buttress going downslope. Perhaps more importantly, I
have assumed that there are no dynamic forces going upslope and
that there are such forces going downslope. This is the really impor-
tant assumption and the one that significantly decreases the FS value.
GMA Techline
Dear K.O.,
1. You should use the GRI GM13 specifica- >> For more, search GMA Techline at
www.geosyntheticsmagazine.com
tion for the GM and the GRI GCL13 speci-
fication for the GCL. That is exactly what
they were developed for and should be
used accordingly. All credible manufactur-
ers know of their existence and produce
products accordingly.
2. The specifications are material specs, not
design specs. Yes, shear strength of all sur-
faces adjacent to the GM and GCL must be
assessed and compared to the site-specific
shear stresses. It is a straight geotechnical
design.
3. ALR values are set by the regulator who is
giving the permit for the project. That said,
50–200 lphd is, indeed, a common value
and one that should be met using a GM/
GCL composite with good CQC and CQA.
GMA Techline
www.geosyntheticsmagazine.com | Geosynthetics 45
www.geosyntheticsmagazine.com | Geosynthetics 47
Announcing HIGHLIGHTS
Geo-Frontiers 2011 Education
The organizing committee is developing an
• Transportation Research Board (TRB)
• U. S. Universities Council for Geotechnical
Education and Research
Andrew Aho
Managing Director
G MA members were in Washington, D.C., March 1-3 for the asso-
ciation’s semiannual Lobby Days. GMA has consistent represen-
tation in Washington through our contracted firms, Kemp Partners/
+1 651 225 6907 or Whitmer & Worrall. But to reinforce GMA’s message on Capitol Hill,
800 636 5042 twice a year GMA-member companies send representatives to meet
amaho@ifai.com with Members of Congress as both constituents and members of our
trade association.
Interesting time
It was an interesting time in Washington, D.C., as we observed how a
GMA is dedicated to
sole U.S. senator, Jim Bunning (R-Ky.), singlehandedly blocked a tem-
our members’ success.
porary jobs and transportation measure forcing a two-day shutdown
GMA actively identifies, of the U.S. Department of Transportation and temporarily delaying
assesses, analyzes a 30-day extension of unemployment benefits and shutting off trans-
and acts upon market
portation funding.
growth opportunities
As a result, there were massive furloughs within the U.S. DOT and
and issues that affect
its member companies.
a stop to funding for state DOTs. Not uncommon in politics, a “deal”
The activities of finally was negotiated for Sen. Bunning to stop his filibuster of this
the association are funding, and in a matter of days the Senate passed the funding bill, it
proactive in nature and was signed by the president, and funds once again started to flow to
center on five areas: state DOTs.
» Engineering support (As a side note, before his political career Jim Bunning was a Hall
» Business of Fame Major League Baseball pitcher, “shutting down” his opponents
development by recording more than 2,000 strikeouts.)
» Education
» Government relations
Executive Council
Our activities in Washington began March 1 with a meeting of the GMA
» Geosynthetics
industry recognition
Executive Council members.
The Executive Council acted on several issues related to the asso-
ciation, including a review of the draft project work plan from the
www.gmanow.com American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
(AASHTO) National Transportation Product Evaluation Program
(NTPEP). The proposed work plan would create new quality control
and product testing requirements for geotextile manufacturers with
products that are used in federal and state transportation projects.
GMA proposed the program to NTPEP and is pleased with the
progress to-date. The program will be discussed in detail during the
NTPEP annual meeting May 13 in Orlando, Fla.
www.geosyntheticsmagazine.com | Geosynthetics 49
USIFI dinner Lobby Days 2 and 3 require the use of geosynthetics liners in
Day 1 of Lobby Days concluded with a Day 2 was packed with 18 meetings with coal-ash waste sites. Rep. Shuler contin-
joint dinner with representatives from the Members of Congress and their staffs. ues to be one of our strongest congres-
United States Industrial Fabrics Institute The meetings were designed to garner sional supporters regarding the use of
(USIFI). USIFI, like GMA, is a division of support for the use of geosynthetic liners geosynthetic materials.
IFAI, and represents U.S. manufacturers in coal-ash waste sites and also for support Day 3 concluded with a meeting with
and suppliers of technical textiles. of a GMA-proposed geotextiles-as-separa- other trade associations interested in the
Officials from the Department of tors study. GMA has had a steady presence coal-ash issue.
Commerce, including the chief textile on Capitol Hill and many of the Members GMA wants to recognize these mem-
negotiator of the U.S. Trade Office joined of Congress were familiar with the GMA ber companies that sent representatives to
50 members of USIFI and GMA for din- issues and were very supportive. these lobby days and provided financial
ner. Joung Lee, a financial analyst for On March 3, a small group of GMA support for GMA’s ongoing government
AASHTO shared his take on transporta- members and lobbyists met with Rep. relations program: Agru America, Cooley,
tion funding (or more accurately, the lack Heath Shuler (D-N.C.) and discussed Dalco Nonwovens, Fiberweb, GSE, Propex,
of funding) with the group. legislation he was introducing that would RMA, TenCate, and Tensar.
Carlisle’s GeoPolypro meets the the new GM-18 standard for polypropylene.
The industry’s only geomembrane designed with Carlisle’s proprietary weathering technology, Carlisle’s
GeoPolypro continues to perform after 20,000 hours of intense U/V exposure. GM-18 testing, conducted by
the Geosynthetics Research Institute, is the most stringent test in the industry.
For more information on Carlisle’s GeoMembrane and the new GM-18 standard,
visit www.carlislegeomembrane.com
Recap of ASTM/GRI-23
23rd annual workshop’s focus:
‘Geosynthetic materials durability’
A
Bob Koerner, Ph.D., P.E., workshop on field and laboratory experiences of geosynthetic
NAE, is director of the materials durability was held in conjunction with ASTM’s Com-
Geosynthetic Institute mittee D35 meeting in San Antonio, Texas on Jan. 29, 2010.
in Folsom, Pa., and is a
This one-day event was organized by Sam Allen of TRI Environ-
member of Geosynthetics
mental and George Koerner of the Geosynthetic Institute. There were
magazine’s Editorial
19 presentations and to say that the topics, presentations, and audi-
Advisory Committee.
GSI: +1 610 522 8440, ence participation were all excellent is a decided understatement. Rave
www.geosynthetic-institute.org reviews and numerous compliments were expressed at the workshop’s
conclusion and in the days following. A glimpse of the material pre-
sented by each speaker follows.
The morning session focused on geomembrane durability. Bob
Koerner of GRI presented a review of laboratory-exposed geomem-
brane durability via 5 years of incubation in ultraviolet fluorescent
weathering devices. HDPE, LLDPE, fPP, and EPDM were included in
the evaluations and, properly formulated, all should function for at least
30 years in a hot climate. Rick Thomas of TRI followed, describing how
an investigator assesses the remaining life of exposed geomembranes
that have already been in service. The issue, of course, is how much
longer is the material viable. Rick gave several interesting illustra-
tions of his technique. Ian Peggs of I-Corp followed with his approach
toward predicting end-of-life for exposed HDPE geomembranes. For
HDPE he looks at surface oxidation, embrittlement, and initiation of
stress cracking. These three opening presentations dovetailed in a very
instructive manner.
George Koerner of GSI then presented two case histories of exposed
HDPE geomembranes (16 and 20 years), with comparison of various
property values as-manufactured vs. their current condition. Oxidative
induction time was seen as the key parameter to monitor in this regard.
Mark Wolschon of EPI International illustrated how a PVC geomem-
brane retained its functionality after 30 years of exposed service. Bob
Koerner of GSI then illustrated the basic failure modes of fPP geomem-
branes: cracking, powdering, and flaking. This latter mode has never
been reported before. Craig Benson of the University of Wisconsin gave
his results of the behavior of various exhumed geosynthetics in landfill
covers after service lifetimes of 5-9 years at 9 different landfills. Most
significant in this regard was the reported loss of interface strength of
thermally bonded geotextile-to-geonet drainage composites.
In a change-of-pace presentation, Chris Athanassopoulos of
CETCO (for Archie Filshill) described how polymer additives inserted
www.geosyntheticsmagazine.com | Geosynthetics 51
into the structure of bentonite enhances a maximum permeability of 5 x 10-9 cm/s, First GSI-Asia conference
physical and mechanical properties of which meets the GRI-GCL3 specification. in November
geosynthetics using data from HDPE Eric Blond of SAGEOS and Pascal Saunier The Geosynthetic Institute (GSI) and
testing. Indeed, nanotechnology has of Afitex-Texel presented their laboratory the National Pingtung University of Sci-
come to geosynthetics! evaluations of a new drainage geocompos- ence and Technology (NPUST) have
Jimmy Youngblood of GSE illustrated ite insofar as mechanical and hydraulic announced the first GSI-Asia Geosyn-
the 9-year and 20-year performance of properties are concerned. Joel Sprague of thetics Conference.
two HDPE lined surface impoundments. TRI Environmental illustrated a potential The conference is scheduled for Nov.
As illustrated by physical and mechanical in-situ test method to evaluate the tensile 16–18, 2010, in Taichung, Taiwan. Spon-
testing, there was no apparent degrada- strength (aka, possible degradation) of sors for the event include the National
tion. John Cowland of GeoSystems Ltd. rolled erosion control products. Science Council and the Taiwan minis-
gave a presentation that compared steel H.-Y. Jeon of INHA University used tries for economy and for education.
tank containment of hazardous liquids accelerated immersion testing with differ- The conference theme is “Geosyn-
against a floating geomembrane cover ent liquids at different pH values to eval- thetics in Infrastructure Applications,”
system. The latter is significantly more uate possible degradation of geotextiles. with main topics including: mechanically
economical. Five years of performance Guidance on the conditions and criteria stabilized earth structures, coastal and
data for such an application was also for acceptable long-term performance hydraulic engineering, erosion control
presented. This particular presentation were also presented. Kent von Maubeuge and sustainable engineering, and trans-
engendered much participant discussion of NAUE gave two sets of exposed dura- portation and pavement engineering.
with respect to geomembrane additives, bility data on black vs. white geotextiles. Major presentations during GSI-Asia
and whether the specific anti-oxidant for- In the laboratory weathering device, the include: Imad L.Al-Qadi, director, Illinois
mulations should be made public (at least black geotextile outperformed the white Center of Transportation, “Geosynthet-
to the owner/designer/purchaser). It was geotextile, while in the field the exact ics in pavements: Optimization through
a lively discussion to say the least! opposite was observed. The discussion advanced modeling and field response
The afternoon session focused on as to why and how this occurred was measurements;” Chris Lawson, global
durability of geosynthetics other than fascinating. Dhani Narejo of Caro Engi- director, Soil Reinforcement & Geosyn-
geomembranes. Willie Lieu of Tensar neering offered historical insight into two thetics, TenCate, “Geosynthetic soil rein-
began by presenting data on exposed geocell walls, one nonvegetated, the other forcement in Asia;” Robert M. Koerner,
PP geogrids in laboratory incubation vegetated. No noticeable degradation to director, GSI, “The importance of drain-
for 80°C, 70°C and (anticipated) 60°C the HDPE material was noticeable in age control for MSE walls and slopes;”
with a resulting halflife of 114 years. Ben either wall after 25 years of service. and Jorge G. Zornberg, vice president,
Doerge of the USDS-NRCS federal agency Sam Allen was the excellent modera- IGS, “Geosynthetic capillary barriers.”
presented geotextile information after tor of the workshop and George Koerner To register or for more information:
exhuming samples that had been in place closed the event by summarizing each www.gsi-asia2010.npust.edu.tw
for 20 years. There were no changes in paper in an accurate and succinct man- —Ron Bygness
any of the mechanical properties. This ner. A booklet of the 19 abstracts is avail-
type of “no change” is a powerful induce- able from GSI. That said, if specifics of
ment for agencies to use geosynthetics for any presentation is desired the presenter
long-term applications. Robert Lozano should be contacted directly. Also to be
of Linear Composites presented data on mentioned is that many of the abstracts
three MSE walls that had been in-place are coauthored. To those coauthors,
for 20-30 years. The PET reinforcement appreciation is also extended. Lastly, Sam
geogrids showed no signs of hydrolytic and George thanked the audience for
degradation. J. P. Kline of Geotechnics their active and lively questions that fol-
presented results of an overlap test to lowed each of the 19 presentations.
evaluate possible leakage between adja- —Bob Koerner, director, GSI
cent GCL panels. The resulting perme-
ability through the seam overlap indicates
www.geosyntheticsmagazine.com | Geosynthetics 53
CALENDAR
AUGUST RemTech Expo 2010 The Congress will have four days of technical ses-
sions (Monday–Thursday) and one day of field vis-
21–23 SEPTEMBER | FERRARA, ITALY
Earth Retention-2010 its (Friday). The Congress will be held in a five-star
The 4th edition of Remediation Technologies Ex- equivalent environment, the India Habitat Centre
1–4 AUGUST | BELLEVUE, WASH. hibition will be held at the Ferrara Exhibition and in New Delhi.
ER Conference-3 will be at the Hyatt Regency Bel- Conference Centre in Ferrara, Italy.
levue Aug. 1–4. For more information: www.6iceg.org
The event is organized by the Ferrara Fiere Congress
Organized by the Earth Retaining Structures Com- and by coordinator, Dr. Daniele Cazzuffi.
mittee of ASCE’s Geo-Institute, the every-20-years The expo will feature: remediation technologies;
event follows ER-1 (1970) and ER-2 (1990) that were removal and encapsulation of asbestos; character-
MARCH
held in Ithaca, N.Y. ER2010 will bring together a broad ization, investigation, and instruments for analysis,
community of geo-professionals working on retention Geo-Frontiers
inspection, and monitoring; brownfields and real
structures using a wide range of support systems with estate; landfills, and dredging activities. 13–16 MARCH 2011 | DALLAS, TEXAS
comprehensive coverage of developments during The Geo-Institute of ASCE, the Industrial Fabrics
the past 20 years. To register, exhibit, or for more information: Association International (IFAI), the Geosynthetic
+39 0532 909495 900713, info@remtechexpo. Materials Association (GMA), the North American
Conference coverage is diverse, including case his-
com, www.remtechexpo.com Geosynthetics Society (NAGS), and the Geosynthetic
tories and practice-oriented papers, recent research
findings, innovative technologies, and the emerging Research Institute join forces to present Geo-Fron-
arts across many disciplines. Professional engineers, tiers/2011 at the Sheraton Dallas Hotel.
researchers, specialty contractors, regulators, edu- OCTOBER Billed as the top geotechnical event of the year, it
cators, and students will interact across a range of reprises a similar event from six years ago—Geo-
technical sessions, tutorials, short courses, discussions, 2010 Global Waste Frontiers/2005 in Austin, Texas.
and equipment demonstrations. Management Symposium
Read more at the Geo-Frontiers Watch section in
3–6 OCTOBER | SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS this issue, page 10.
For more information: www.er2010.org
The Global Waste Management Symposium (GWMS)
is a three-day event serving the needs of the landfill To register, exhibit, or for more information:
community. www.geofrontiers11.com
SEPTEMBER
The GWMS offers a technical sessions forum for the
3rd International Symposium on peer-reviewed presentation of applied and fundamen- IFAI Expo Asia
Geosynthetic Clay Liners tal research, case studies, and policy analysis.
22–25 MARCH 2011 | SINGAPORE
15–16 SEPTEMBER | FORTRESS MARIENBERG, Among the 2010 GWMS technical session topics:
There is a tremendous output and consumption of
WÜRZBURG, GERMANY biocovers, bioreactor case studies, moisture content
specialty fabrics in the Asia-Pacific region. The cur-
Topics for this conference include: application/case in bioreactors, landfill siting issues, landfill liners and
rent trade shows in India and China focus almost
studies, durability/lifetime, laboratory testing, per- covers, landfill cover performance, final closure of
exclusively on the disposable nonwoven industry.
formance, and regulations/approvals. landfills, leachate management, and solar energy
IFAI Expo Asia 2011 is the first major event in the re-
for landfills.
The Scientific Committee: Robert M. Koerner (GSI), gion that specifically targets end-product fabricators
Nathalie Touze-Foltz (Cemagref), and Helmut Zan- For more information: www.wastesymposium. who use all types of materials: woven, nonwoven,
zinger (SKZ). com/gws2010/public/enter.aspx knit, and composite textiles.
The Organizing Committee: Irina Bender (SKZ) and IFAI Expo Asia 2011 will feature a trade exhibition,
Norbert Schlör (SKZ). attracting as visitors three targeted audiences:
6th International Congress on
• those involved in the supply chain seeking network-
For more information: www.gbrc-wuerzburg.com/ Environmental Geotechnics
ing and partnership opportunities.
(6ICEG)
• the actual fabricators of finished products in appli-
8–12 NOVEMBER | NEW DELHI, INDIA
cations such as medical, automotive, construction,
The Indian Geotechnical Society (IGS) will host the safety, military, recreation, and structures.
ASDSO’s Dam Safety ‘10 6th International Congress on Environmental Geo-
19–23 SEPTEMBER | SEATTLE, WASH. technics (6ICEG) in New Delhi Nov. 8-12, 2010, on • those who have design, application, and market
behalf of the International Society for Soil Mechanics influence, such as government purchasing agencies,
The conference, associated meetings, and technical
and Geotechnical Engineering (ISSMGE). More than civil engineers, and architects.
sessions will be at the Washington State Convention
& Trade Center in downtown Seattle. 400 delegates, including 250 from abroad, will gather Besides the trade exhibition, the four-day event will
to discuss the latest geotechnical developments. feature world-class educational symposiums for 10
Hotel reservations in the ASDSO group block are
The 6th Congress is titled “Environmental Geotech- specific niche end-markets for specialty fabrics.
available until Aug. 24 at the Grand Hyatt Seattle
(www.grandseattle.hyatt.com) or the Hyatt-Olive 8 nics for Sustainable Development,” with these eight For more information: www.ifaiexpoasia.com
(www.olive8.hyatt.com). Or call the Passkey reserva- technical themes: MSWs and landfills, slurry ponds;
tion service (1 888 421 1442) to make a reservation contaminated land, groundwater, and abandoned
at either hotel. landfills; geosynthetics and other new materials;
sustainability—professional practice and education;
Registration information is available starting in geohazards—disaster mitigation and management;
May 2010. testing, monitoring, and performance evaluation;
For more information: www.damsafety.org physical and numerical modeling.
18 Fiberweb ✦ GMA
800 441 2760
www.TyparGeotextiles.com
The Geosynthetic Materials SEE US ONLINE
Association actively identifies, 7 Firestone Specialty Products ✦ GMA www.geosyntheticsmagazine.com
assesses, analyzes and acts upon 800 428 4442
market growth opportunities www.firestonesp.com/ifai7 Tensar Iternational Corporation ✦ GMA
and issue that affect its member
Thrace-LINQ, Inc. ✦ GMA
companies. The activities of Cv3 Geo-Frontiers 2011
the association are proactive in www.geofrontiers11.com
nature and focus on five areas:
Engineering support • Business
development • Education •
Government relations • Geo- ) IFAI member
synthetic industry promotion GMA Geosynthetic Materials Association member
VISIT
www.gmanow.com
CONTACT
Andrew Aho
amaho@ifai.com
800 636 5042.
www.geosyntheticsmagazine.com | Geosynthetics 55
FINAL INSPECTION
www.geofrontiers11.com
Geo-Frontiers 2011 is co-organized by Under the auspices of Includes GRI-24 Annual Conference