Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Jean-Jacques Fry
Electricité de France, Le Bourget du Lac Cedex, France
All rights reserved. No part of this publication or the information contained herein may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, by
photocopying, recording or otherwise, without written prior permission from the publishers.
Although all care is taken to ensure integrity and the quality of this publication and the information herein,
no responsibility is assumed by the publishers nor the author for any damage to the property or
persons as a result of operation or use of this publication and/or the information contained herein.
TC550.2.I58 2007
627 .8—dc22 2007002563
Table of Contents
Preface VII
Overview paper
The state of the art of assessing the likelihood of internal erosion of embankment dams, water
retaining structures and their foundations. 1
R. Fell & J.J. Fry
Submitted papers
V
Hydraulic criteria for internal erosion in cohesionless soil 179
S. Perzlmaier
Evaluation of erosion of soil used in dykes and earth embankments which are subjected to flood 191
P. Reiffsteck
Evaluating internal instability and internal erosion in a selection of existing Swedish
embankment dams 203
H.F. Rönnqvist
A review of Corps of Engineers levee seepage practices in the United States 209
G.L. Sills, PE & N. Vroman
Investigation of internal erosion by the process of suffusion in embankment dams and their
foundations 219
C.F. Wan & R. Fell
FIREBIRD_Breach: A numerical model for breach formation in earthfill dams by overtopping
of the crest 235
P. Wang & R. Kahawita
VI
Internal Erosion of Dams and their Foundations – Fell & Fry (eds)
© 2007 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-43724-0
Preface
Internal erosion and piping in embankments and their foundations is the main cause of failures and accidents
to embankment dams. For new dams the potential for internal erosion and piping can be controlled by
good design and construction of the core of the dam and provision of filters to intercept seepage through
the embankment and the foundations.
However many existing dams were not provided with filters or transition zones and are susceptible
to internal erosion and piping failure. This has been recognized by dam owners and engineers and there
has been research carried out in recent years to better understand the physical processes and mechanics
of internal erosion. The editors believed that there would be considerable benefits in gathering together
international experts on the topic in order to define the state of the art and to seek their ideas on research
needs.
Electricité de France (EDF) and the Institut pour la Recherche Appliquée et l’Expérimentation, (IREX)
agreed to sponsor a Workshop on Internal Erosion and Piping of Dams and their Foundations which was
held from the 25th to 27th April 2005 in Aussois, France, with two objectives: (a) Definition of the main
types of physical processes of internal erosion, and of the framework upon which the safety assessment
of all the internal erosion incidents of water retaining structures can be based. (b) Assessment of current
research needs.
This book presents an overview paper which is a consensus report on the State of the Art and research
needs. It has been prepared based on the papers and discussion at the Workshop and has been reviewed by
the attendees. Also presented is a selection of the papers presented at the Workshop. These cover the whole
internal erosion process from initiation of erosion, continuation (whether filters are effective), progression
to form a pipe, and formation of a breach.
Robin Fell
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering,
The University of New South Wales,
Sydney, Australia
Jean-Jacques Fry
Electricité de France,
Le Bourget du Lac Cedex,
France
VII
Internal Erosion of Dams and their Foundations – Fell & Fry (eds)
© 2007 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-43724-0
Robin Fell
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Jean-Jacques Fry
Electricité de France CIH, Le Bourget Cedex, France
ABSTRACT: An International Workshop on Internal Erosion of Embankment Dams and their Foundations
was held in Aussois, France from 25th to 27th July 2006.This paper presents a consensus report on the State of
the Art. It has been prepared based on the papers and discussions at the Workshop, and has been reviewed by the
attendees.
The internal erosion process is considered in terms of initiation of erosion, continuation (whether filters will
stop erosion), progression, detection and intervention, and breach.
Research needs to improve the prediction of the likelihood of internal erosion are described.
1
INITIATION → CONTINUATION → PROGRESSION → BREACH/FAILURE
Leakage exits on d/s side Continuation of erosion Backward ero- Breach mechanism
of core and backward erosion sion progresses forms
initiates back to the reservoir
Figure 1. Diagram of internal erosion in the embankment by backward erosion (Foster & Fell, 1999a).
OUTFLOW
ENLARGING
ORIGINAL PORE
PRESSURES
Figure 2a. Potential breach (failure) phenomena-pipe enlargement and slope instability.
d’Hydraulique (CIH), Electricité de France, Le Bour- by the seepage flow and the process gradually works
get, France, who were the principal organizers of the its way towards the upstream side of the embankment
workshop. Gregg Barker of Hydro Tasmania, Hobart, or its foundation until a continuous pipe is formed
Australia (who was working on secondment to Elec- (Figure 1).
tricité de France) also assisted with the organization Breach. Breach is the final phase of internal erosion.
of the workshop and with the preparation of this It may occur by one of the following four phenomena
synthesis. (listed below in order of their observed frequency of
This synthesis is a record of the main conclusions occurrence). The breach phenomena are also shown
from the workshop and summaries the research needs. graphically in Figure 2.
It was prepared in a draft form, has been reviewed • Gross enlargement of the pipe (which may include
by the attendees and represents, so far as is practic-
the development of a sinkhole from the pipe to the
able, a consensus of views of those who attended the
crest of the embankment).
workshop. • Slope instability of the downstream slope.
• Unravelling of the downstream face.
• Overtopping (e.g. due to settlement of the crest from
suffusion and/or due to the formation of a sinkhole
2 DEFINITIONS
from a pipe in the embankment).
For the purposes of this paper, the following def- Concentrated leak erosion. Erosion in a concen-
initions are used. The definitions are presented in trated leak may occur in a crack in an embankment
alphabetical order. or its foundation, caused by differential settlement,
Backward erosion. Backward erosion involves the desiccation, freezing, and thawing, and by hydraulic
detachment of soils particles when the seepage exits fracture; or it may occur in a continuous perme-
to a free unfiltered surface, such as the ground surface able zone containing coarse and/or poorly compacted
downstream of a soil foundation or the downstream materials which form an interconnecting voids system
face of a homogeneous embankment or a coarse (Figure 3). The concentration of flow causes erosion
rockfill zone immediately downstream from the fine (sometimes called scour) of the walls of the crack or
grained core. The detached particles are carried away interconnected voids.
2
CREST SET TLES & PIPE OUTFLOW EXCEEDS
DAM OVERTOPS ROCKFILL CAPACITY;
FINE FRACTION
ROCKFILL DISLOGES
MIGRATES
CAUSING SLOPE IN-
STABILITY
CLAY
CORE
Figure 2b. Potential breach (failure) phenomena-overtopping by settlement and unravelling of the downstream face.
Figure 3. Diagram of internal erosion in the embankment in a concentrated leak (Foster & Fell 1999a).
3
are defined: concentrated leak, backward erosion,
suffusion and soil contact erosion (each of which are
defined separately in this section).
Internal erosion. Occurs when soil particles within
an embankment dam or its foundation, are carried
downstream by seepage flow. Internal erosion can ini-
tiate by concentrated leak erosion, backward erosion,
suffusion and soil contact erosion.
Internal erosion path. Internal erosion path is the
path of moving eroded particles inside the dam and/or
its foundation.
Internal erosion phases. Internal erosion of Figure 5. Grading envelopes of some broadly graded soils
which did not self filter (Sherard, 1979).
embankment dams and their foundations can be re-
presented by four phases:
upstream and the downstream side of the embankment
• Initiation of erosion. or its foundation.
• Continuation of erosion (i.e. whether there are Progression. Progression is the third phase of
filters capable of stopping the erosion process). internal erosion, where hydraulic shear stresses within
• Progression to form and sustain a pipe and/or to the eroding soil may or may not lead to the enlargement
increase seepage and pore pressures in the down- of the pipe. Increases of pore pressure and seepage
stream part of the embankment or its foundation. occur. The main issues are the likelihood of and rate
• Development of a breach resulting in uncontrolled of pipe enlargement and whether the pipe will col-
release of the water from the reservoir. lapse, whether upstream zones may control the erosion
Intervention. Intervention is the ability to stop the process by flow limitation and whether a pipe will
internal erosion process during one of the first three extend through the low permeability zones of the
phases and prior to the formation of a breach. embankment.
Load. The main loads exerted on a dam are hydro- Self-filtering. In soils which self-filter, the
static loads (which are related to the reservoir level) coarse particles prevent the internal erosion of the
and seismic loads (which may be expressed in terms medium particles, which in turn prevent erosion of the
of earthquake magnitude and peak ground acceleration fine particles. Soils which potentially will not self-
[PGA]). Other potential loads include acts of terrorism filter include those which are susceptible to suffusion
or an aero plane crashing into the dam. The likeli- (internal instability), and very broadly graded soils
hood of a given reservoir level load is expressed as such as those which fall into the grading envelope
the annual probability or frequency that the maximum shown in Figure 5. Figure 5 is from Sherard (1979).
reservoir level is within a certain range. The likelihood The soils had particle size distributions which plotted
of a given seismic load is expressed as the annual prob- nearly as a straight line, were of glacial origin, and the
ability or frequency of a loading parameter (e.g. peak dams from which the soils were taken had all exhibited
ground acceleration) being in a certain range. signs of internal erosion. The soils have a volume of
Load condition. A load condition is a theoretical fine particles greater than the volume of voids between
combination of different loads exerted on a dam at a the coarse sand and gravel fraction and the coarser par-
given time for analysis purposes. The loading condi- ticles are ‘floating’ in the finer particles. The figure is
tion is the first node of the internal erosion assessment. not meant to define the boundary of such soils, only
The loading condition controls whether certain failure examples.
modes are possible, and affects the likelihood of each Soil contact erosion (also described as external or
of the internal erosion phases. Table 3 (Section 4.1.1) surface suffusion). Soil contact erosion is a form of
provides some recommended loading conditions. internal erosion which involves selective erosion of
Location of initiation of erosion. This is the physical fine particles from the contact with a coarser layer,
initiating point of internal erosion in the structure such for instance along the contact between silt and gravel
as in the embankment, foundation, along a conduit sized particles (Figure 6)
or along a spillway interface. (Refer to Figure 12 in, Some erosion. The filter is between the no erosion
Section 4.1.2). and continuing erosion criteria and seals after ‘some’
No erosion. The filter is finer than the no erosion erosion of the base material.
criteria and seals with practically no erosion of the Suffusion and internal instability. Suffusion is a
base material. form of internal erosion which involves selective ero-
Piping. Piping is the form of internal erosion which sion of fine particles from the matrix of coarser
initiates by backward erosion, or erosion in a crack or particles (coarse particles are not floating in the fine
high permeability zone, and results in the formation particles). The fine particles are removed through the
of a continuous tunnel called a ‘pipe’ between the voids between the larger particles by seepage flow,
4
FINE-GRAINED
MATERIAL
COARSE-GRAINED
MATERIAL
DIRECTION
OF SEEPAGE
FLOW
100
90 CLAY TO SILT SAND GRAVEL
80
70
% Passing
60
50 GAP GRADED SOIL
40
30
20
COARSELY GRADED SOIL
10 WITH A FLAT TAIL OF FINES
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
Particle size (mm)
Figure 7. Soil gradation types which are susceptible to suffusion or internal instability.
leaving behind an intact soil skeleton formed by the Figures 1 and 2 for internal erosion in the embank-
coarser particles. Soils which are susceptible to suffu- ment, and Figure 8(a) and 8(b) for internal ero-
sion are internally unstable. Coarse graded and gap sion in the foundation and from embankment to
graded soils, such as those shown schematically in foundation.
Figure 7 are susceptible to suffusion.
In these soils the volume of fines is less than the 3.2 General description
volume of voids between the coarse particles.
The process of internal erosion and piping of a dam
embankment and/or its foundation is best considered
in a systematic way, so that all internal erosion phases
3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION
are considered for each failure mode and loading
condition.
3.1 The overall process
Table 1 below summarizes the key factors to be con-
The overall process for internal erosion leading sidered, in a general manner, in each successive phase
to failure of a dam is shown diagrammatically in of internal erosion.
5
INITIATION → CONTINUATION → PROGRESSION → BREACH/FAILURE
Leakage exits from the Continuation of Backward erosion in Breach mechanism
foundation and backward erosion progresses to form a forms
erosion initiations pipe
Figure 8a. Model for the development of failure by internal erosion in the foundation by backward erosion. (Foster & Fell
1999a).
(b)
INITIATION → CONTINUATION → PROGRESSION → BREACH/FAILURE
Leakage exits the core into Continuation Backward erosion pro- Breach mechanism
the foundation and backward of erosion gresses to form a pipe. forms
erosion initiates as core Eroded soil is transported
erodes into the foundation in the foundation
Figure 8b. Model for the development of failure by internal erosion from the embankment to foundation by backward erosion.
(Foster & Fell 1999a).
6
Table 1. Summary of the key factors to be considered in each of the successive phases of internal erosion.
Loading Location Initiation Continuation Progression Detection Intervention Breach
HYDROSTATIC EMBANKMENT BACKWARD FILTERS THE RATE OF PIPING MODE PIPING MODE GROSS
EROSION EROSION ENLARGEMENT
Frequent water level Upper portion PERSONNEL
MONITORING AVAILABILITY
Rare flood Lower portion NO EROSION FREQUENCY AND AND TRAINING
CONCENTRATED WILL PIPE STAY TYPE (EG LEAKAGE,
Safety flood Along conduit LEAK OPEN? TEMPERATURE) EQUIPMENT UNRAVELLING
EXCESSIVE AVAILABILITY OR SLIPE IN-
SEISMIC Adjacent wall EROSION STABILITY
UPSTREAM MATERIALS
OBE over changes in SUFFUSION FLOW LIMITA- AVAILABILITY
slope in the cross TION BY WELL SURVEILLANCE LOSS OF FREE-
MDE valley foundation CONTINUING GRADED ROCK- FREQUENCY WEATHER BOARD BY
profile CONTACT EROSION FILL OR CON- CREST
(It is preferable to EROSION CRETE FACE FLOODING SETTLEMENT
7
consider the full At construction SLAB:
range of flood levels features such as ACCESS
and seismic loads haul roads and river
rather than only closure sections NO FILTER (
extreme values) CRITICAL =CONTINUING TIME OF
FOUNDATION GRADIENTS OR EROSION CRITICAL INTERVENCE SINKHOLE AND
VELOCITY GRADIENT OR DEPENDING ON LOSS OF FREE-
Valley which use particle VELOCITY THE RATE OF BOARD
size, or using DEVELOPMENT
Abutment methods based on OF INTERNAL
opening size or EROSION AND
EMBANKMENT permeability PIPING
TO FOUNDATION
Valley
Abutment
LOADING LOCATION INITIATION CONTINUATION PROGRESSION DETECTION & BREACH
INTERVENTION
GROSS
ENLARGEMENT
SLOPE INSTABILITY
NO DETECTION
OR INTERVENTION
EROSION, ENLARGE, OVERTOPPING DUE TO
SUSTAIN PIPE CREST SETTLEMENT
EXCESSIVE DETECTION AND
EROSION INTERVENTION
UNRAVELLING OF THE
NO PROGRESSION DOWNSTREAM FACE
CONTINUOUS
EROSION
BACKWARD
EROSION
SOME EROSION
CONCENTRATED
LEAK
EMBANKMENT NO EROSION
SUFFUSION
FREQUENT
RESERVOIR LVL FOUNDATION
SOIL CONTACT
EROSION
EMBANKMENT TO
FLOOD FOUNDATION
EARTHQUAKE
Figure 9. Event tree representing the various phases of failure by internal erosion through the embankment.
Table 2. Example of a sequence of questions faced when assessing an internal erosion problem.
Question Answer
(1) What is the loading condition? Reservoir rises to X metres above full supply level
(2) What are the possible mechanisms Erosion initiates as concentrated leak erosion in
of initiating erosion? cracks near the dam crest
(3) What is the filter efficiency in controlling erosion? Erosion continues at an unfiltered exit point
(4) What are the hydraulic consequences Progression: erosion can form a pipe (dam core supports
of the on-going erosion? a stable roof and the core will not self heal); inflows are not limited
by entrance condition; soil continues to be erodible under the
hydraulic conditions
(5) Are the consequences detected? Detection only when a pipe has formed with large flows
(6) What are the possible means of a Not possible to lower the reservoir level; flow too great to install a
quick and efficient repair? reverse filter to control erosion. Intervention unsuccessful
(7) What breach mechanisms may develop? Breach process begins by instability of the downstream slope
4.1.2 Location of initiation of internal erosion and There are three categories of internal erosion modes
failure path in a typical analysis. These were developed by Foster &
All possible locations of initiation of internal erosion Fell (1999a) from work by Von Thun (1996) and are
should be defined for the dam (Figure 12 gives some as follows:
examples). Many cases of failure due to internal ero-
1. Internal erosion in the dam embankment.
sion are related to initiation of erosion along conduits,
2. Internal erosion in the foundation.
the interface of the core with the spillway, cracks due
3. Internal erosion from the dam embankment into the
to differential settlement on construction surfaces such
foundation.
as winter or wet season shut downs and river diver-
sion closures and on the contact between foundation Internal erosion in the foundation is only an issue
and core. for soil and erodible rock foundations. Internal erosion
8
2 Erosion initiates in crack
3 Erosion continues
(no filter above FSL)
1 Reservoir level rises 4 Erosion progresses
Full supply level x to form a pipe
5 Seepage detected
when pipe is formed
6 Slope instability
leading to loss
of freeboard
Rockfill Earthfill core Rockfill
5
Filter
Figure 10. Example of internal erosion and piping in the embankment (to be read in conjunction with Table 2).
Table 3. Examples of loading conditions to be considered for assessing the likelihood of internal erosion.
Note. See Figures 11 and 12 for explanation of flood levels relative to the level of the top of the core, and the locations of 3A,
B and C.
Figure 11. Relationship between flood levels and top of the core for an example dam.
9
1. Spillway wall interface 5. Embankment to foundation
2. Adjacent to conduit 6. Foundation (if the foundation is soil or erodible rock)
3. Crack associated with steep abutment profile 7. Embankment through poorly compacted layer, crack,
4. Desiccation on top of core (or by backward erosion if the core is cohesionless)
from the embankment into the foundation may occur 4.1.3 Initiation by suffusion
where there are coarse soils such as gravels or open Internal erosion by suffusion can apply to the embank-
jointed rock in the foundation. ment and to soils in the foundation. Table 5 is a record
There can be multiple failure modes in different of the discussions which took place at the workshop,
parts of the embankment in each of these categories and details the methods available for assessing the sus-
for any dam so it is important to identify all these by ceptibility of soils to suffusion. For each method, the
a thorough failure modes analysis, and to assess the reference, the area of application (i.e. types of soils)
likelihood of failure of each separately to identify the and some comments from workshop participants are
most critical ones. provided.
10
Table 5. Methods available for assessing the susceptibility of soils to suffusion.
Detailed comments arising from discussion in the was that soils with a PI not greater than 7% were
workshop include: potentially subject to suffusion.
4. The term ‘suffosion’ has been applied to situations
1. BC Hydro testing has shown that the critical gradi- described in this paper as ‘soil contact erosion’.
ent is influenced by the stresses on the soil (more Suffosion has also been used in some literature to
likely at low stresses), and the direction of flow describe backward erosion in broadly graded soils
(horizontal versus vertical). with a finer fraction which is too large to satisfy the
2. Their testing also showed that gradients vary locally requirements for suffusion. That is in soils which
within the test sample, and that erosion occurred are not internally unstable as defined here, but will
locally within the sample, rather than globally. not self filter.
3. Participants indicated that plastic soils would not be 5. It was suggested by R Bridle that the Vaughan &
subject to suffusion. Lafleur indicated soils with a Soares (1982), Vaughan and Bridle (2004) ‘perfect
Plasticity Index (PI) greater than about 10% would filter’ concept could be applied to assess whether
not be subject to suffusion, Wan indicated soils with soils would be internally unstable. However this is
clay size content up to 10% and a PI of up to 13% at the conceptual stage at this time.
had been tested at UNSW and had been subject to 6. There would appear to be valuable data on suffusion
suffusion. Bellendir indicated Russian experience in the Russian literature.
11
Table 6. Methods available for assessing the susceptibility of soils to backward erosion.
Weijers & Sellmeijer (1993) Fine-medium sand Based on flume tests, some large scale, exit
Uniformity coefficient (Cu) 1.6–3.5; gives surface horizontal
the gradient for initiation and progression Critical gradient depends on permeability, d70 ,
angle of repose and test geometry
Schmertmann (2000) Fine to medium sands Cu up to 6.8 Critical gradient is dependent on Cu,
gradients as low as 0.1 for Cu 1.2 and
1 for Cu approximately 6
Kézdi (1969)
German research in
Karlsruhe University
Monnet (1998) Sand-gravel soils Threshold criteria is dependent upon
permeability
4.1.4 Initiation by backwards erosion. 3. The participants considered that backward erosion
Table 6 is a record of the discussions which took place was probably restricted to cohesionless soils or soils
at the workshop, and details the methods available with only limited plasticity at gradients likely to
for assessing the susceptibility of soils to backward occur within a dam. However, the limits of plasticity
erosion. For each method, the reference, the area of at which backward erosion could occur were not
application (i.e. types of soils) and some comments known. Laboratory tests by Sun (1989) and Marot
from workshop participants are provided. et al (2005) showed that backward erosion could
Detailed comments arising from discussion in the occur in more cohesive soils, but initiated at very
workshop: high gradients which were not likely to occur in
dams or their foundations.
1. The Schmertmann (2000) method indicates that 4. When assessing seepage gradients in the cores of
for soils with a uniformity coefficient greater than embankment dams account should be taken of the
6, backward erosion would not occur unless the variation in permeability of the soil with effective
hydraulic gradient was greater than 1.0. How- stress (as detailed in Vaughan, 1994) and degree
ever many Swedish dams, with broadly graded of saturation (Le Behan & Leroueil, 2002). These
silty-sandy-gravel core materials have experienced variations will tend to give higher pore pressure
internal erosion at gradients from 0.5 to 1.0 and this gradients at the downstream side of the core than
would seem to contradict the Schmertmann method would be estimated using uniform permeability’s.
if it is due to backward erosion. For these dams 5. There was a suggestion that there was literature
the exit surface is steeper than for the Schmert- from the petroleum industry which could be useful.
mann tests which may help explain the difference.
However the fill in these dams was placed in thick 4.1.5 Initiation by soil contact erosion
(700 mm) layers so the internal erosion process may Soil contact erosion can apply to erosion of the
be that of a concentrated leak in poorly compacted embankment into a coarse gravel layer in the foun-
soil, not backward erosion. dation or erosion of a fine soil in the foundation into
2. There was concern from some that the flume tests a gravel layer.
by Weijers & Sellmeijer (1993) and Schmertmann Table 7 is a record of the discussions which took
(2000) involve a planar smooth surface along which place at the workshop, and details the methods avail-
the water flows and therefore they simulate phe- able for assessing the susceptibility of soils to soil
nomena that are somewhat different from those contact erosion. For each method, the reference, the
illustrated by Figure 1. The tunnel forms a pipe area of application (i.e. types of soils) and some
because the overlying ‘roof’is the plexi-glass cover, comments from workshop participants are provided.
a situation different from those in Figure 1 where Detailed comments arising from discussion in the
the overlying soil may collapse and self-heal the workshop:
erosion process. In a dam this roof would have to be 1. There are difficulties to determine the critical
provided by a clay soil inter-bedded with the sand, hydraulic gradient depending on the layering and
the clay core of the dam, or for spillway structures the angle of the contact, direction of the flow,
concrete of the spillway. It is noted that the tests intensity of stress and influence of time.
involved sands having uniformity coefficient val- 2. This is a phenomenon which has received relatively
ues substantially smaller than dam cores material little attention from researchers and the methods are
made of finer and more broadly graded material. not well developed.
12
Table 7. Methods available for assessing the susceptibility of soils to soil contact erosion.
Bakker (1993) Sand and gravel Threshold depending on d50 of the base soil and
filter porosity and two charts one for parallel
flow and the other for perpendicular flow to contact
Brauns & Witt (1987) Sand and gravel Very similar to Bakker (1993)
Briaud et al (1999a,b) Method developed for estimating erosion of soil at bridge piers
Fry (2005) Silt overlying sandy gravels Limiting Darcy velocity in the order of 2 × 10−2 m/s for the
cases assessed so far
EDF laboratory testing program commencing
Vaughan & Soares (1982) Silt, sand, gravel Threshold of erosion based on permeability and the smallest
particle size
Table 8. Methods available for assessing the susceptibility of embankments to erosion in concentrated leaks.
4.1.6 Initiation by concentrated leak to concentrated leaks. For each method, the reference,
Internal erosion initiating in a concentrated leak can the area of application (i.e. types of soils) and some
apply either to internal erosion in embankment or comments from workshop participants are provided.
foundation soils. Detailed comments arising from discussion in the
Table 8 is a record of the discussions which took workshop:
place at the workshop, and details the methods avail- 1. It was noted that it was necessary to clearly
able for assessing the susceptibility of embankments distinguish between the critical hydraulic shear
13
stress at which erosion begins and the rate of ero- 4.2 Continuation
sion. The Sherard pinhole test, crumb tests, and
Table 9 is a record of the discussions which took place
USDA-SCS double hydrometer test are indices of
at the workshop, and details the methods available for
dispersivity, and the general likelihood that erosion
assessing continuation of internal erosion. For each
may initiate in a soil. The results are dependent on
method, the reference, the area of application (i.e.
the chemical composition of the water used in the
types of soils) and some comments from workshop
test, with some soils showing more likely disper-
participants are provided.
sion in water with low dissolved salt content. The
Detailed comments arising from discussion in the
critical hydraulic shear stress is discussed in Wan
workshop:
& Fell (2005), and is the hydraulic shear stress in
a crack or hole in the soil at which erosion begins. 1. It was pointed out that the French Committee on
The rate of erosion can be quantified in hole and Large Dams was about to recommend a filter design
slot erosion tests, and is the mass rate of erosion method for small dams which, for widely graded
per unit hydraulic shear stress of the soil from the soils, recommends that the filter size be determined
walls of the crack or hole. The critical shear stress using the Sherard & Dunnigan (1989) method, but
and erosion rate are dependent on water quality, splitting the soil on the change of slope at the
with lower critical shear stresses and higher rates fine end of the gap grade, and on the change in
of erosion in dispersive soils with low salts content slope for broadly graded soils, rather than using the
water. more empirical approach of re-grading the soil on
2. The Briaud et al (1999 a, b) contact erosion test, the the 4.75 mm sieve before applying the filter rules.
jet erosion test (Hanson 1991, 1992; and ASTM It was agreed by Workshop participants that this
D5852-95), and flume tests (e.g. Shaikh et al was reasonable, particularly if the soil was inter-
1988a,b) all measure erosion properties, but model nally unstable. The majority of participants used
different erosion mechanisms.The erosion test used Sherard & Dunnigan (1989) or related criteria for
should be selected to model the mechanism being design and assessment of existing dams.
considered. 2. It was noted that the Vaughan & Soares (1982)
3. The critical shear stress is difficult to define in method could lead to a very fine first filter, and
laboratory tests. CEMAGREF will be using sen- in some situations, three filters might be needed
sitive equipment to detect particles of eroded soil using this method, while the Sherard & Dunni-
in the water in the slot erosion tests they will be gan (1989) method might require two filters. Given
doing. the good performance of filters designed using
4. The results from hole and slot erosion tests can be Sherard & Dunnigan (1989) and similar methods, it
used in conjunction with the hydraulics of flow in would seem unnecessary to require finer filters than
cracks and holes to assess whether erosion will ini- required by Sherard & Dunnigan (1989) in most
tiate, but the hydraulics are complicated by variable situations, particularly if the Sherard & Dunnigan
crack geometry and surface roughness and the pres- (1989) criteria were met with some margin of safety.
ence of multiple zones in the embankment which 3. There was concern by some participants that Sher-
affect the hydraulic gradients. It should be recog- ard & Dunnigan (1989) criteria are not conservative
nised that the presence of a crack or a soil with a enough for dispersive soils. An example of where
low resistance to initiation of erosion does not of erosion had occurred for filters which apparently
itself mean initiation will occur. There must be suf- satisfied the criteria was mentioned but no details
ficient erosive shear stress from the water flowing are available. Other participants had not heard of
in the crack. In some cases soil adjacent the crack an example of a dam with filters designed and
may swell and the crack may close before erosion constructed to satisfy modern filter design cri-
can begin. teria experiencing internal erosion and piping. The
5. Experience in Finland is that the water in the pores extensive study of case histories by Foster & Fell
of silts and moraines in near surface situations of (2000) supports this experience. It was noted that
dams during construction and in service freezes and Foster & Fell (2001) recommend somewhat finer
ice lenses are formed. On thawing these become a filters than Sherard & Dunnigan (1989) for disper-
zone of concentrated leakage in which erosion can sive soils. A number of participants including those
initiate. from USBR suggest doing laboratory no-erosion
6. Some participants are aware of dams where voids filter tests for important projects where dispersive
or low density zones had formed just below the soils are present.
phreatic surface. This is thought to be due to set- 4. It was noted that the excessive and continuing ero-
tlement of the soil below the phreatic surface on sion criteria proposed by Foster & Fell (1999b,
saturation. The voids or low density zones are a 2001) were based on laboratory tests simulating a
potential location for initiation of erosion. concentrated leak. It was suggested by some that
14
Table 9. Methods available for assessing continuation of internal erosion.
methods such as Lafleur et al (1989, 1993) and for assessing progression of internal erosion. For each
Schuler (1995) using opening size, percentage fines method, the reference, the area of application (i.e. types
and D95 might also be useful. of soils) and some comments from workshop partici-
5. There was a consensus that filters with more than pants are provided Detailed comments arising from
5% non plastic fines were undesirable because they discussion in the workshop:
might sustain a crack. Filters with more than 12% 1. There were a number of case studies presented
non plastic fines were highly likely to hold a crack, including Matahina Dam, Porjus Dam, Suova Dam
at least in the unsaturated condition. If the fines and Coursier Dam, where upstream zones in con-
were plastic the situation would be significantly junction with downstream transition zones and
worsened. shoulder zones had acted to reduce the flow rate
6. The ‘bucket’ or ‘sandcastle’ test, (Vaughan & through a pipe in the core. The upstream zones
Soares, 1982) in which a cylinder of the filter was had washed into the pipe to assist in controlling the
placed in a container at the density it was placed in progression process before flows became too large
the embankment, and slowly flooded to see if the for the downstream zone to discharge safely. It was
soil collapsed, was used by some participants. It was clearly important to consider these zones as poten-
noted that the degree of compaction of the filter was tial flow limiters and crack stoppers in the progres-
important, with examples known where densely sion phase when assessing the likelihood of failure.
compacted filters had not collapsed on flooding, 2. There was a consensus that sand boils in the foun-
whereas the same material loose had collapsed. It dation at the downstream toe of a dam were an
was noted that Virginia Tech was doing research on indication of a potential for failure, and they should
this topic. be treated with care. There were examples cited
e.g. Sills & Vroman (2005) of progressive ero-
4.3 Progression
sion from sand boils with headwater levels cycling
Table 10 is a record of the discussions which took place to the same or lower levels. Attendees were also
at the workshop, and details the methods available concerned at the presence of sinkholes in the floor
15
Table 10. Methods available for assessing progression of internal erosion.
Backward erosion
Weijers & Sellmeijer (1993) Fine-medium sand See initiation
Method predicts initiation and progression for an unfiltered exit
Schmertmann (2000) Fine-medium sand See initiation
Method predicts initiation and progression for an unfiltered exit
Suffusion
Schuler (1993)
Rönnqvist (2005)
Concentrated leak
Wan & Fell (2002, 2004a,b) Clay-silt-sand soils HET, SET determine the rate of erosion, this can be coupled with
the hydraulics of flow in cracks or holes to allow estimation of the
rate at which a pipe will enlarge
of the reservoir, and felt that it was necessary to from workshop participants are provided. Detailed
understand the mechanism leading to their devel- comments arising from discussion in the workshop:
opment, but knew of many cases where these had
1. There is an example of breach due to a sinkhole
not progressed.
which occurred in a test embankment in Norway
3. There was a consensus that suffusion was not gen-
(6 m high zoned embankment with clay core, rock-
erally likely to lead to a piping failure, because the
fill shoulders and no filters). The embankment was
flows were unlikely to be sufficient to erode the
constructed with defects in the core, which lead
coarse soil remaining after suffusion had occurred.
to the formation of a pipe and in turn, a sinkhole
However slope instability might result from a rise
developed in the upstream side of the crest of the
in the phreatic surface level in the downstream
embankment. The sinkhole in itself did not cause
slope of the embankment due to the increase in
breach, but when the reservoir level was raised
seepage flows in the soil in which suffusion had
above the level of the sinkhole, the sinkhole filled
occurred.
with water and the dam breached.
4. Sinkholes in the dam crest and upstream of the crest
were an indication of erosion of the core, and of 4.5 Detection & Intervention
washing into the pipe of the upstream filter or other
material upstream of the core. The data available on Table 12 is a record of the discussions which took place
sinkholes seemed to show that they did not gener- at the workshop, and details the methods available
ally lead to failure of the dam by overtopping, but for the detection and intervention of internal erosion
attendees warned that for those which did fail, the incidents. For each method, the reference, the area of
evidence was washed away, so one should not be application (i.e. types of soils) and some comments
too confident. from workshop participants are provided.
5. The rate of progression of backwards erosion can Detailed comments arising from discussion in the
be restricted by the existence of layers of soil or workshop:
embankment materials into which the seepage is 1. There was a consensus that there was a need to
flowing which act as filters. If the material acts link the instrumentation and surveillance to the
as a no-erosion filter backwards erosion will not critical failure modes. It was agreed that the suc-
progress. If some erosion is possible into the mater- cess of detection and intervention depended on the
ial it may slow the process. Backwards erosion time to develop a failure, after a concentrated leak
can be very rapid when no filters are present developed in a pipe and the time available is very
(i.e. when water and eroded particles exit to the short (i.e. hours). For other breach mechanisms,
atmosphere). days or weeks might be available.
Temperature methods for analysing seepage vari-
4.4 Breach
ations are promising and gaining wider usage.
Table 11 is a record of the discussions which took place However some methods such as optical fibres were
at the workshop, and details the methods available best suited if installed in the embankment during con-
for assessing breach mechanisms caused by internal struction. Other methods required drilling of holes into
erosion. For each method, the reference, the area of the embankment to install the instruments or to provide
application (i.e. types of soils) and some comments access for temperature probes. They were therefore by
16
Table 11. Methods available for assessing breach mechanisms caused by internal erosion.
Gross enlargement
Wahl TL (1998) Breach width, duration and outflow Compared various available equations to case
history data
Blais, J.P. (2005) Breach duration Validated on 11 case studies
Unravelling
Sölvig (1991) Unravelling of rockfill at the downstream Höeg et al (2004) and workshop participants indicate
toe of an embankment that Norwegian model tests have sown that the
Sölvig method is conservative
New criteria are being proposed but were not
available at the time of the workshop
Slope instability
Fell et al (2004, 2005) Instability of downstream slope Uses conventional stability analysis and estimates the
of an embankment displacement using Khalili et al (1996) or numerical
analysis to assess whether freeboard is lost
Settlement and loss of freeboard
Fry (2005) Settlement due to suffusion or backward erosion in
broadly graded materials and foundations and
embankments Up to 1 cm/year has been observed
on dykes (Fry, 2005)
Sinkhole and loss of freeboard
Foster & Fell (1999a), Database of sinkhole events
Fell et al (2004) Sinkholes historically have seldom lead to failure
Table 12. Methods available for the detection and intervention of internal erosion incidents.
Detection
Dornstädter (1996,2005) Embankments and foundations Review available temperature techniques
Johansson (1996,1997,2005), Embankments and foundations Review available temperature and
Johansson et al (2000), USEPA geophysical techniques and methods for
(2000), Aufleger et al (2000) determination of flow discharge rates
Fauchard & Meriaux (2004),
Fauchard et al (2005) Embankments and foundations
Time available for intervention
Brown (2005) Embankments and interfaces between Based on expert elicitation
embankments and structures such as walls
Fell et al (2001, 2003) Time from observation of a concentrated Based on analysis of historic data
leak to failure of embankment dams
Intervention
Chopin (2005) Embankments and foundations Reviewed defects of diaphragm walls
their nature best able to measure conditions locally intervention must have been unsuccessful. The
(e.g. where leakage was observed or suspected. Care assessment of the likelihood of failure can be
must be taken in drilling holes into embankments and determined by:
grouting around casing or to backfill drill holes so as to
1. Engineering judgement, considering each of the
avoid hydraulic fracture. Dry drilling methods should
individual phases.
be used and grouting done in short stages with time
2. Quantitative risk analysis, usually based on event
for grout to cure before the next stage.
trees. Methods for doing this are described in
Brown & Gosden (2004), Foster & Fell (1999a),
4.6 Assessment of the likelihood of failure Fell et al (2004, 2005), Cyganiewicz & Smart
In order for the dam to breach, all of the phases (2000), USBR (2000) and Cyganiewicz et al
of internal erosion must occur and detection and (2005).
17
3. Qualitative risk analysis based on event trees 5.2 Initiation due to soil contact erosion
but without formal quantification e.g. Bell et al,
5.2.1 Critical hydraulic gradient
(2002).
Not a great deal of testing has been conducted to date
to determine the critical hydraulic gradient required
to initiate soil contact erosion. Suggestions for future
research include:
5 RESEARCH NEEDS
• Extrapolating Bakker (1993) charts to silt-gravel
5.1 Initiation due to suffusion materials.
• Testing the effect of seepage flow direction (e.g.
5.1.1 Soils which are susceptible to internal
upwards, horizontal, downwards).
instability
• Testing whether the critical hydraulic gradient is
Suggestions for future research include:
affected by stresses in the soil.
• Laboratory testing on a wide range of soils to • Determining the mechanism of material move-
better define the particle size distribution character- ment – can critical shear stress be applied in a
istics of internally unstable soils and to understand laboratory flume situation?
the effects of the plasticity of fines and the com- • Determining a correlation between critical hydraulic
paction of material on the likelihood of suffusion gradient and particle size distribution and other
occurring. properties such as soil plasticity and degree of
• Multi-variable discriminate analysis to better define compaction.
the boundaries between internally stable and inter- • Determining a correlation between seepage velocity
nally unstable soils. at which erosion initiates and particle size distribu-
• Investigate whether the Vaughan & Soares (1982) tion and other properties such as soil plasticity and
concept can be applied to assessing whether a soil degree of compaction.
is internally unstable. • Investigation of the effect of the contact between
the core and open joints in the foundation on the
likelihood of initiation due to soil contact erosion.
5.1.2 Critical hydraulic gradient
Not a great deal of testing has been conducted to date 5.2.2 Size and quantity of material in
to determine the critical hydraulic gradient required internal erosion
to initiate suffusion. Suggestions for future research Relating to the size and quantity of material mobilized
include: in soil contact erosion processes, suggestions for future
•
research include:
Testing the effect of seepage flow direction (e.g.
upwards, horizontal, downwards). • Estimating the maximum soil particle sizes which
• Testing whether the critical hydraulic gradient is are mobilised in soil contact erosion processes and
affected by stresses in the soil. the rate of their movement.
• Determining the mechanism of material movement • Testing the influence of cycles (e.g. regularly fluc-
(as this is affected by gradient, velocity, influence tuating hydrostatic load) and the rate of increase of
of turbulence). hydraulic gradient or seepage velocity on the move-
• Testing the effect of void ratio on critical ment of particles in soil contact erosion processes.
gradient. • Using numerical modelling to better understand
the movement of particles in soil contact erosion
These need to be done for a range of particle size
processes.
distributions and plasticity.
18
• Testing the effect of cohesion on the likelihood of • Determine the effect of wetting-induced swelling
initiation due to backward erosion. (While many on the ability to close a crack and stop the con-
believed that backward erosion could not develop tinuation of internal erosion (experimental tests are
in cohesive soils under gradients normally experi- required in a laboratory first, followed by numerical
enced in dams and their foundations there was not modelling).
a unanimous view).
• Investigation into the rate at which backward 5.5 Filter research (continuation of erosion)
erosion occurs. Schmertmann (2000) showed that 5.5.1 Conventional filter design methods
backward erosion can occur rapidly in laboratory Suggestions for further research relating to conven-
scale models. tional filter design methods include:
• Investigating the effects of clogging of filters by
5.4 Initiation due to a concentrated leak eroded material and chemical and bacterial deposits.
• Investigating the conditions which can cause filters
Research needs relating to the understanding of initi- to become cohesive (e.g. particle size, cement-
ation due to a concentrated leak can be separated into ing, degree of compaction, stress conditions, the
two separate issues. chemistry of circulating water and the presence of
limestone).
5.4.1 Predicting or detecting the presence of • Testing of the effect of fines content and plasticity
cracking and high permeability zones of fines on the ability of the filter to sustain cracks.
Suggestions for further research include: • Assessment of the filter criteria for widely graded
• Development and trialing of geophysical techniques core materials, including those which are internally
for locating cracks in an embankment including unstable, and those which are internally stable but
acoustic and seismic techniques. will not self filter.
• Research on the occurrence of cracks due to desic- • Assessment of case studies of filter performance for
cation, including the effect of shrinkage limit and widely graded core materials.
water content profile. • Testing of the effect of segregation of widely graded
• Research into the development of ice lenses in dam core materials on filter performance.
cores. 5.5.2 Assessment of the applicability of the Vaughan
• Using numerical models to assess the conditions and Soares so called ‘Perfect Filter’ concept
required to induce cracking and validation of these Suggestions for future research include:
against case studies where cracking is known to have
occurred. • More extensive laboratory testing to confirm the
• Research into whether the stresses in low stress applicability of the method which to date has
zones are influenced by seasonal effects including been based on limited testing. This should include
rainfall and temperature. comparison with conventional design methods and
review of case studies by both conventional and the
5.4.2 Predicting the initiation of erosion in cracks Vaughan & Soares (1982) method to see whether
and high permeability zones filters designed using conventional methods are
Suggestions for further research include: sufficiently conservative as most assume.
• More extensive laboratory testing to check the
• Using parallel laboratory testing and possibly applicability of the concept to internally unstable
numerical models to compare the different methods soils and to internally stable but non self filtering
available for determining the hydraulic shear stress soils.
(e.g. erosion function apparatus (contact erosion), • More extensive laboratory testing to determine the
jet erosion test, rotating cylinder and hole erosion uncertainty in the equations linking permeability of
test). the filter to the particle size of the filter and to the
• Linking the mechanics of erosion in open channels smallest particle retained.
and river beds to erosion in cracks in dams. • Research to assess the influence of the permeability
• Determine the effect of test scale on the results of of the downstream filter on the particle detachment
laboratory testing using numerical modelling and phenomena in the core.
back-analysis of case studies.
• Further developments of test techniques to more 5.6 Progression
precisely define the critical shear stress for cracks
and in high permeability zones and the soil charac- Suggestions for further research relating to the under-
teristics which govern this. standing of progression of internal erosion include:
• Determine a method of predicting the initiation of • Investigations into the mechanics of the size
erosion in cracks in silt-sand-gravel soil. of internal erosion pipes that can develop and
19
relation to pipes that have developed in case 5.9 Overall system
histories.
Suggestions for further research relating to the under-
• The validation of sediment transport laws used in
standing of the overall system of internal erosion
sedimentology for pipes (i.e. the ability to remove
include:
the large particles under high velocities).
• Investigation of the effect of upstream and down- • Research into the decision analysis process for
stream zones in limiting progression of internal assessing the likelihood of internal erosion for an
erosion. existing dam in quantitative and qualitative terms.
• Development of a theoretical hydraulic approach to • Development of quantification of uncertainty, use
progression phenomena including the potential for of fuzzy logic, probabilistic approaches.
turbulent flow in the pipe and porous media flow in • Refinement of event trees and fault trees for use in
the upstream and downstream zones. quantified analyses.
• Research into a multi-disciplinary approach of mod- • Refinement of decision-making criteria based on
elling progression of internal erosion – combining back-analysis of internal erosion incidents where
soil mechanics, moveable boundary hydraulics and good quality data is available.
hydraulics. • Development of surveillance and monitoring tech-
• Improving the understanding of the progression niques to be more closely targeted to identified
phase of internal erosion initiated by backward internal erosion modes of failure natural gamma and
erosion and suffusion. cross hole seismic).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
5.7 Breach
Suggestions for further research relating to the under- The support of Electricité de France (EDF) and
standing of the breach phase of internal erosion The Institut pour la Recherche Appliquée et
include: l’Expérimentation, (IREX) for the Workshop in Aus-
sois are acknowledged. The considerable contribution
• Modelling all the phases of the process leading to of attendees to this paper is also acknowledged.
breaching and validating them on real case studies
(e.g. Teton).
• Modelling of the interaction between the rate of REFERENCES
enlargement of the pipe and reservoir drawdown
during breach, particularly for small reservoirs. Arulanandan, K., Gillogley, E. & Tully, R. 1980. Develop-
• Better understanding of the unravelling processes ment of a quantitative method to predict critical shear
stress and rate of erosion of natural undisturbed cohesive
relating to small sized rockfill and gravely material.
soils. Technical Report, GL-80-5, US Army Engineers,
To date most unravelling research has focussed on Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS EU.
large sized rockfill material. Arulanandan, K. & Perry, E. B. 1983 Erosion in relation to fil-
• Development of a ‘threshold leakage’ through the ter design criteria in earth dams. Journal of Geotechnical
downstream shoulder of a dam (specific for differ- Engineering, ASCE Vol 109, No 5, 682–696.
ent types of dams) at which we should begin to be Aufleger, M., Strobl, T. & Dornstader, J. 2000 Fibre optic tem-
concerned for the safety of the dam and intervention perature measurements in dam monitoring-four years of
is required dams. experience. 20th Congress on Large Dams, Beijing 2000.
• Extrapolating the application area of the Sölvig Q78-R.1, 157-17-. International Commission on Large
Dams, Paris.
(1991, 1995) method for rockfill to finer sized
Bakker, K.J. et al 1993.Filters in de water bouw. C.U.R.
material such as gravels and sandy gravels. Rapport 161, ISBN 9037600298.
Blais, J.P. 2005 Presentation at Workshop on Internal Erosion
of Embankment Dams and their Foundations, Aussois,
5.8 Detection and intervention France.
Brauns, J. & Witt, K.J. 1987.Proposal for an advanced concept
Suggestions for further research relating to the under- of filter design, Proc.9th European Conference on Soil
standing of detection and intervention of internal Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Dublin.
erosion incidents include: Briaud, J.L., Ting, F.C.K.,Chen, H.C., Gudavalli, R., Perugu,
•
S., & Wei, G. 1999a SRICOS: prediction of scour rate
Review of case studies of failed detection or inter-
in cohesive soils at bridge piers. Journal of Geotechnical
vention. and Geoenvironmental Engineering,ASCE, Vol 125, No 4,
• Investigations of methods for early detection of 237–246.
internal erosion incidents, using conventional and Briaud, J.L., Ting, F.C.K., Chen, H.C., Gudavalli, R., Kwak,
unconventional methods (e.g. temperature, resistiv- K., Philogene, B., Han, S.W., Perugu, S., Wei, G.,
ity, self-potential [SP]). Nurtjaho, P., Cao, Y., & Li, Y 1999b SRICOS: Prediction
20
of scour rates at bridge piers, Report 2937-F to the Texas Fauchard, C., Cote, P. and Meriaux, P. 2005. High output
Department of Transportation, Texas A and M University, geophysical methods for dyke testing. GEOLINE 2005,
Civil Engineering, College Station,TX 77843-3136, USA. Lyon, France.
Bridle, R.C 2005. Assessing the vulnerability of dams to Fell, R., Wan, C.F., Cyganiewicz, J. & Foster, M.A.
internal erosion. In Proceedings of Workshop on Internal 2001. The time for development, and detecaibility of
Erosion of Embankment Dams and their Foundations, internal erosion and piping in embankment dams and
Aussois, France Editors R Fell and JJ Fry, 25–27 April their foundations. UNICIV Report No. R-399. School
2005.Balkema of Civil and Environmental Engineering, the Univer-
Brown, A.J., Gosden J.D 2004 Interim guide to quantitative sity of New South Wales, Sydney 2052 Australia,
risk assessment for UK reservoirs. Thomas Telford. ISBN: ISBN: 84841 366 3.
0 7277 3267 6. Fell, R., Wan, C.F., Cyganiewicz, J. & Foster, M.A. 2003.
Brown, A.J. 2005 Issues in the management of internal ero- Time for development of internal erosion and piping
sion in UK embankment dams In Proceedings ofWorkshop in embankment dams. ASCE Journal of Geotechnical
on Internal Erosion of Embankment Dams and their Foun- and GeoEnvironmental Engineering, Vol. 129, No.4,
dations, Editors R Fell and JJ Fry, Aussois, France, 25–27 307–314.
April 2005. Balkema. Fell, R., Wan, C. F. & Foster, M.A. 2004 Methods for esti-
Bui, H., Fell, R. & Song, C. 2004. Two and three dimen- mating the probability of failure of embankment dams by
sional numerical modeling of the potential for crack- internal erosion and piping-piping through the embank-
ing of embankment dams during construction. UNICIV ment. UNICIV Report No R-428, The University of New
Report No. 426, The School of Civil and Environmental South Wales, Sydney, 2052 Australia. ISBN: 85841 395 7.
Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney. Fell, R., & Wan, C.F. 2005 Methods for estimating the
Bui, H., Tandjiria, V., Fell, R., Song, C. & Khalili, N. 2005. probability of failure of embankment dams by internal
Two and three dimensional numerical analysis of the erosion and piping-piping through the foundation and
potential for cracking of embankment dams – supplemen- from embankment to foundation. UNICIV Report No R-
tary report. UNICIV Report R438, The University of New 436, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052
South Wales, ISBN:85841 405 8. Australia. ISBN: 85841 403 1.
Burenkova, V.V. 1993.Assessment of suffosion in non- Fell, R., Foster, M.A. & Wan, C.F. 2005. A framework for
cohesive and graded soils. Proceedings, the First assessing the likelihood of internal erosion and piping of
International Conference “Geo-Filters”, Karlsruhe, Ger- embankment dams and their foundations. In Proceedings
many, 20–22 October 1992. Filters in Geotechnical and of Workshop on Internal Erosion of Embankment Dams
Hydraulic Engineering, Brauns, Heibaum and Schuler and their Foundations, Aussois, France Editors R Fell and
(editors), 1993 Balkema, Rotterdam,. 357–360. JJ Fry, 25–27 April 2005. Balkema
Chapuis, R.P. 1992. Similarity of internal stability criteria for Foster, M.A. 1999 The probability of failure of embankment
granular soils. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 29, dams by internal erosion and piping. PhD thesis, School
1992, 711–713. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University
Chapuis, R.P., Constant, A. & Bass, K.A. 1996 Migration of New South Wales.
of fines in 0–20 mm crushed base during placement, Foster, M.A. & Fell, R. 1999a A framework for estimating the
compaction, and seepage under laboratory conditions. probability of failure of embankment dams by piping using
Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 33, 1996, 168–176. event tree methods. UNICIV Report No. R-377. School of
Chopin, M.2005. Presentation at Workshop on Internal Ero- Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of
sion of Embankment Dams and their Foundations. New South Wales, Sydney, Australia 2052. ISBN: 85841
Cyganiewicz. J. & Smart, J. 2000 US Bureau of Reclamation’s 343 4.
use of risk analysis and risk assessment in dam safety Foster, M.A. & Fell, R. 1999b.Assessing embankment dam fil-
decision making. 20th International Congress on Large ters which do not satisfy design criteria. UNICIV Report
Dams, Beijing, Q. 76, 351–369, International Commission No R-376, School of Civil and Environmental Engineer-
on Large Dams, Paris. ing, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Cyganiewicz JM, Engemoen WO & Redlinger CG 2005) 2052. ISBN: 85841 343 4, ISSN: 0077-880X.
Bureau of Reclamation experience with evaluating inter- Foster, M.A. & Fell, R. 2000. Assessing embankment dam fil-
nal erosion of embankment dams. In Proceedings of ters which do not satisfy design criteria. UNICIV Report
Workshop on Internal Erosion and Foundations, Aussois No R-376, the University of New South Wales, Sydney
France Editors R Fell and JJ Fry, April 25–27, 2005. Australia 2052, ISBN: 85841 343 4.
Balkema. Foster, M.A. & Fell, R. 2001. Assessing embankment dam,
Dornstadter, J. 1996.Sensitive monitoring of embankment filters that do not satisfy design criteria. Journal of
dams. Proceedings Symposium on repairing and upgrad- Geotechnical and GeoEnvironmental Engineering, ASCE,
ing of dams, Stockholm. Editors Johansson and Ceder- Vol. 127, No. 5, May 2001, 398–407.
strom, KTH Trych och Kopiering, 259–268. Fry, J.J. 2005, Presentation at Workshop on Internal Ero-
Dornstädter, J. 2005. Presentation at Workshop on Internal sion of Embankment Dams and their Foundations,Aussois
Erosion of Embankment Dams and their Foundations, France.
Aussois, France. Hanson, G.J. 1991 Development of a jet index to charac-
Fauchard, C. and Meriaux, P. 2004. Methodes geophysiques terise erosion resistance of soils in earthen spillways.
et geotechniques pour le diiagnostic des digues de pro- Transactions of the ASAE, Vol 34, No 5, 2015–2020.
tection contre les crues- Guide pour la mise in oeuvre et Hanson, G.J.1992 Erosion resistance of compacted soils.
l’interpretation. CEMAGREF ISBN: 2-85362-643-1. Transportation Research Record 1369, 26–30.
21
Høeg, K., Løvoll, A. & Vaskinn, K.A. 2004. Stability and Aussois, France Editors R Fell and JJ Fry, 25–27 April
breaching of embankment dams: field tests on 6m high 2005.Balkema
dams. Hydropower and Dams, Issue 1, 2004. Monnet, A. 1998) Boulance, erosion interne, renard. Les
Johansson, S. 1996 Seepage monitoring in embankment dams instabilités sous écoulemen (in french)t. Revue Française
by temperature and resistivity measurements. Symposium de Géotechnique, N◦ 82 pages 3–10.
on repairing and upgrading of dams, Stockholm, June 5– Rönnqvist, H. 2005 Prediction on Swedish Embankment
7, 1996. Editors Johansson and Cederstrom. KTH, Tryck Dams Internal Instability and Risk of Internal Erosion by
och Koperiering, 288–306. using currently available methods in Correlation to Oper-
Johansson, S. 2005. Detection of internal erosion in embank- ative History. In Proceedings of Workshop on Internal
ment dams using temperature, resistivity and SP measure- Erosion of Embankment Dams and their Foundations,
ments. In Proceedings of Workshop on Internal Erosion of Aussois France Editors R Fell and JJ Fry, 25–27 April
Embankment Dams and their Foundations,Aussois France 2005. Balkema.
Editors R Fell and JJ Fry, 25–27 April 2005. Balkema Schmertmann, J.H. 2000 The non-filter factor of safety
Johansson, S. 1997 Seepage monitoring in earth embankment against piping through sands. ASCE Geotechnical Special
dams. Doctoral Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Publication No. 111, Judgment and innovation. Edited by
Stockholm, Sweden. F. Silva and E. Kavazanjian, ASCE, Reston.
Johansson, S., Claesson, J., Dahlin, T., Friborg, J., Hellstrom, Schuler, U. 1995. How to deal with the problem of suffusion.
G., & Bing, Z., 2000. A parameter study for internal ero- Research and development in the field of dams, Swiss
sion monitoring. A DSIG study in Press.www.ceati.com. National Committee on Large Dams, 145–159.
Kenney, T.C., Chahal, R., Chiu, E., Ofoegbu, I., Omange, Schuler, U. & Brauns, J. 1993. Behaviour of coarse and well
G.N. & Ume, C.A. 1985 Controlling constriction sizes of graded filters. In Filters in geotechnical and hydraulic
granular filters. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 22, engineering, Editors Brauns and Schuler, Balkema.
32–43. Schuler, U. & Brauns, J. 1997 The safety of geotechnical
Kenney, T.C. & Lau, D. 1985. Internal stability of granular filters. Hydropower and dams, Issue 6, 72–74.
filters. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. Shaikh, A., Ruff, J.F. & Abt, S.R. 1988a Erosion rate of com-
215–225. pacted Na-montmorillonite soils. Journal of Geotechnical
Kenney, T.C. & Lau, D. 1986. Internal stability of granular Engineering, ASCE, Vol 114, No 3, 296–305.
filters: Reply. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 23, Shaikh, A., Ruff, J.F., Charlie, W.A. & Abt, S. R. 1988b
pp. 420–423. Erosion rate of dispersive and non-dispersive clays. Jour-
Kézdi, Á. 1969. Increase of protective capacity of flood con- nal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol 114, No 5,
trol dikes (in Hungarian). Department of Geotechnics, 589–600.
Technical University of Budapest, Report No. 1. Sherard, J.L. 1979. Sinkholes in dams of coarse, broadly
Khalili, N., Fell, R. & Tai, K.S. 1996. A simplified method graded soils. Transactions, 13th Congress on Large Dams,
for estimating failure induced deformation. Proc. Seventh New Delhi, India, Vol. 2, 25–35.
Int. Symp. On Landslides. Editor Sennesett, K., Balkema, Sherard, J.L. & Dunnigan, L.P. 1989. Critical filters for
Rotterdam, 1263–1268. impervious soils. J. Geotech. Eng. ASCE, Vol.115, No.7,
Kjaernsli, B., Valstad, T. & Hoeg, K. 1992 Rockfill dams 927–947.
design and construction, Hydropower Development Vol Sills, G.L. & Vroman, N. 2005 A review of Corps of Engi-
10, Norwegian Institute of Technology, Division of neers levee seepage practices in the United States. In
Hydraulic Engineering. Proceedings of Workshop on Internal Erosion of Embank-
Lafleur, J., Mlynarek, J. & Rollin, A.L. 1989. Filtration of ment Dams and their Foundations, Aussois France Editors
broadly graded cohesionless soils. Journal of Geotech- R Fell and JJ Fry, 25–27 April 2005. Balkema.
nical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 115, No. 12, December Skempton, A.W. & Brogan, J.M. 1994 Experiments on piping
1989, 1747–1768. in sandy gravels. Geotechnique 44, No.3, 449–460.
Lafleur, J., Mlynarek, J. & Rollin, A.L. 1993. Filter criteria Sölvig, O. 1991.Through flow and stability problems in rock-
for well graded cohesionless soils. Proceedings, the First fill dams exposed to exceptional loads. 16th International
International Conference “Geo-Filters”, Karlsruhe, Ger- Congress on Large Dams, Q.67 R.20, International Com-
many, 20–22 October 1992, Filters in Geotechnical and mission on Large Dams, Paris.
Hydraulic Engineering, Brauns, Heibaum and Schuler Solvik, O. (1995). Stenfyllningsdammars stabilitet vid
(editors), 1993 Balkema, Rotterdam, 97–106. genomströmning, VASO Dam Committee, Report No.17.
Le Bihan, J.P. & Leroueil, S. 2002 A model for gas and Sun, B.C.B. 1989. Internal Stability of Clayey to Silty Sands.
water flow through the core of earth dams .Canadian A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the
Geotechnical Journal, Vol 39, No 1, 90–102. requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Civil
Lim S.S 2005 – unpublished information, The University of Engineering) in the University of Michigan 1989.
New South Wales, Sydney, Australia 2052. USBR 1977. Design of Small Dams. US Bureau of Reclam-
Lubochkov, E.A. 1965. Graphical and analytical methods ation, Denver.
for the determination of the properties of non-cohesive USBR 1987. Design standards No.13, Embankment dams.
soils characterising suffusion. Izvestia VNIIG, No. 78 (in Chapter 8, Seepage analysis and control. US Bureau of
Russian). Reclamation, Denver.
Marot, D. Alexis, A. & Bendahmane, F. 2005 A specific USBR 2000 Risk analysis methodology-Appendix E-
triaxial device for the study of internal erosion on estimating risk of internal erosion and material trans-
cohesive soils. In Proceedings of Workshop on Internal port failure modes for embankment dams. US Bureau of
Erosion of Embankment Dams and their Foundations, Reclamation, Denver.
22
USBR 2004 Design Standard No 13, Protective Filters. US APPENDIX A
Bureau of Reclamation, Denver.
USEPA 2000 Innovations in site characterization: geophys- LIST OF THOSE WHO ATTENDED THE
ical investigation at hazardous waste sites, August 2000, WORKSHOP
USEPA, Washington DC.
Vaughan, P.R 1994 Assumptions, prediction and reality in
geotechnical engineering. Geotechnique Vol 44, No 4, Barker, Gregg, Electricité de France
573–609. Bartsch, Maria ,Vattenfall, Sweden
Vaughan, P.R. & Soares, H.F. 1982. Design of filters for clay Bellendir, Evgeny, Russia
cores of dams. Jr. Geotech. Benahmed, Nadia, CEMAGREF, France
Div., A. S. C. E. Vol. 108, GT1, 17–32. Blais, Jean-Pierre, Electricité de France
Vaughan, P.R. & Bridle, R.C. 2004. An update on perfect Brown, Alan, Jacobs, United Kingdom
filters. Long-term benefits and performance of dam. Pro- Bridle, Rodney, Consultant, United Kingdom
ceedings 13th conference of the British Dam Society and Chopin, Michel, Consultant, France
European Club of ICOLD. University of Canterbury, UK,
Courivaud, Jean-Robert, Electricité de France
22–26 June 2004; Thomas Telford, London, 516–531.
Von Thun, J.L. 1996. Understanding Piping and Seepage Cyganiewicz, John, Bureau of Reclamation, USA
Failures – The No.1 Dam Safety Problem in the West. Pro- Dornstädter, Juergen, GTC, Germany
ceedings of ASDSO Western Regional Conference, Lake Engemoen, William, Bureau of Reclamation, USA
Tahoe; Nevada. Fell, Robin, University of New South Wales, Australia
Wahl, T. L. 1998. Prediction of Embankment Dam Breach Foster, Mark, URS, Australia
Parameters. Dam Safety Office Research Report No. Fry, Jean-Jacques, Electricité de France
DSO-98-004, Water Resources Research Laboratory, Garner, Steve, BC Hydro, Canada
Bureau of Reclamation, Denver. Gillon, Murray, DamWatch, New Zealand
Wan, C.F. & Fell, R. 2002. Investigation of internal erosion
Johansson, Sam, HydroResearch, Sweden
and piping of soils in embankment dams by the slot erosion
test and the hole erosion test. UNICIV Report No. R-412, Kahawita, René, Ecole Polytechnique de Montréal,
ISBN: 85841 379 5, School of Civil and Environmental Canada
Engineering, The University of New South Wales. Lafleur, Jean, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal,
Wan, C.F. & Fell, R. 2004a. Investigation of rate of erosion of Canada
soils in embankment dams.ASCE Journal of Geotechnical Lopes, Sergio, Laboratoire Central des Ponts et
and GeoEnvironmental Engineering,Vol. 130, No. 4, 373– Chaussées, France
380. Marot, Didier, University GeM, UMR CNRS, France
Wan, C.F. & Fell, R. 2004b. Laboratory tests on the rate of pip- Nguyen, Huu-Phong, Hydro-Québec, Canada
ing erosion of soils in embankment dams. Geotechnical
Nilsson, Ake, Vattenfall, Sweden
Testing Journal, vol.27, No.3, 295–303.
Wan, C.F. & Fell, R. 2005. Investigation of Internal Ero- Perzlmaier, Sebastian,Technical University of Munich,
sion by the Process of Suffusion in embankment Dams Germany
and their Foundations. In Proceedings of Workshop on Reboul, Nadege, ECL, France
Internal Erosion of Embankment Dams and their Foun- Reiffsteck, Philippe, LCPC, France
dations, Aussois, France editors R Fell and JJ Fry, 25–27 Ronnqvist, Hans, Vattenfall, Sweden
April 2005.Balkema Royet, Paul, CEMAGREF, France
Weijers, J.B.A. & Sellmeijer, J.B. 1993. A new model to Sills, George, US Army Corps of Engineers, USA
deal with the piping mechanism in “Filters in Geotech- Taisant, R, CNR, France
nical and Hydraulic Engineering. Brauns, Herbaum and
Vuola, Pekka. Finnish Environment Institute, Finland
Schuler (editors), Balkema, Rotterdam.
Witt, K.J. 1993 Reliability study of granular filters. In fil- Wan, Chi Fai, GHD, Australia
ters in geotechnical and hydraulic engineering. Editors
Brauns, Helbaum and Schuler. Balkema. 3–17.
23
References
Gillon, M.D. & Newton, C.J. 1988. Matahina Dam: the initial
lakefilling incident and the long term performance of the
repair. In Proceedings 5th Australia-New Zealand Conference
on Geomechanics: 585–590. Sydney, 1988. Gillon, M.D. &
Newton, C.J. 1991. Abutment repairs at the Matahina Dam. In
Proceedings 17th ICOLD Congress, (Q66, R50),Vienna 1991.
ICOLD: Paris. Mejia, L., Forrest, M., Bischoff, J., Gillon,
M. & Everitt, S., 1999. Upgrading of Matahina Dam for
Foundation Fault Displacement. In Proceedings ofWaterpower
’99,ASCE, Las Vegas, Nevada, July 1999. Sherard, J.L. 1973.
Embankment dam cracking.Embankment Dam Engineering,
Casagrande Volume,Wiley: USA. Sherard, J.L.&Dunnigan, L.P.
1989.Critical filters for impervious soils. Journal of
Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 115(7): 927–947.
Detection of internal erosion in
embankment dams using temperature,
resistivity and SP measurements