SEC Proposed Rule Will Undermine Whistleblowers

WASHINGTON, D.C. | JUNE 28, 2018​—Today, the Securities and Exchange

Commission (SEC) issued a proposed rule to reduce the size of whistleblower rewards in cases in which
the U.S. recovers $100 million or more. This proposed rule will discourage high-ranking and
well-compensated employees at large financial institutions from blowing the whistle.

National Whistleblower Center Executive Director Stephen M. Kohn participated in the drafting of the
Dodd-Frank Act (DFA) submitted numerous comments during the 2010-11 SEC whistleblower rulemaking
proceedings, and individuall met with every commissioner during the SEC's rulemaking process. Mr. Kohn,
who is an expert on whistleblower law and has represented whistleblowers for 34 years, issued the
following statement:

The proposed rule kills the goose that lays the golden egg.

Large financial rewards are necessary to encourage high-ranking and highly-compensated corporate
executives to blow the whistle on fraud. The risk an employee takes in blowing the whistle on fraud. The
rsik an employee takes in blowing the whistle and placing their career on the line are enormous and the
ability to collect a large award is the single most important motivating factor encouraging employees to
take this risk. This is especially tru with high-executives who could lose large salaries and face the
complete destruction of their careers.

It is these well-placed executives that have the most significant information about large, often transnational
frauds. Every time the SEC give s a large dollar award, executives from around the world are informed
about their right to blow the whistle, and their ability to potentially protect themselves from the harm that
whistleblowers face.

The SEC must remain focused on policing the big banks and the large corporate wrongdoers. The SEC's
proposed rule would have the effect of transforming the SEC Whistleblower Program into one that targets
low-level employees at smaller busineses with lower quality information to report smaller frauds. The goal
must remain to catch the big fish.

Based on our 34 years experience representing whistleblowers, we look forward to meeting with the
Commissioners to fully explain the problems triggered by the proposed rule. We hope the Commissioners
will carefully listen to the information provided by the whistleblower community and are not overly swayed
by the large corporations and financial institutions that will be the primary beneficiaries of this proposed
rule.