Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
ISSN No:-2456-2165
The modal responses for performing Chemistry-related tasks correspond to low regularity or occurrence. For instance, a
majority of CSU student responded that the analysis of pictures was rarely done in this high school chemistry classes, as well as
communicating concepts using illustrations and using computer software to generate graphs and analyze data. Building or
manipulating physical models were mostly never used, while drawings and interpreting graphs by hand were done on a weekly basis
by most of the respondents. The modal responses for performing chemistry-related task correspond to low regularity. For instance, a
majority of FSUU students responded that the analysis of pictures was rarely done in their high school chemistry classes.
Majority of CSU respondents said that their high school Chemistry class meets five days a week, as well as FSUU. On the other
hand, the length of their high school Chemistry Course was one whole year for all of the respondents.
The third indicator showed the requirement for passing the material, in terms of the comparative incidence of memorization and
understanding. Results showed that the high school Chemistry class of CSU consisted mostly of understanding and some
Results indicated that the modal response for all of the selected Chemistry topics by respondents from CSU and FSUU was “a
few weeks”. This means that for most of the respondents, no single topic in Chemistry seemed to dominate the year-long duration of
the course, but rather, their high school teachers have exerted efforts to devote an equal amount of time for different topics.
None at all 5 min 10 min Half of the class Whole Class or More
7 13 13 50 17
CSU
7% 13% 13% 50% 17%
FSUU 7 13 23 27 30
7% 13% 23% 27% 30%
For the number of laboratory activities each month, the The characteristics of laboratory activity most of the
modal response for CSU respondents was 3 times a week, for CSU students responded that the lab builds previous lab
FSUU respondents, an equal number indicated either no activity was weakly evident, as well as the lab addresses belief
laboratory activities or 4 times a week. The frequencies for the about the world and the class, repeats the same lab activity to
rest of the responses were presented in Table 5 since the enhance understanding. Most of the CSU students responded
modal response does not significantly outweigh the other that class uses the same equipment for different experiments
responses. In general, the number of laboratory activities for was moderately evident. For the FSUU students responded
all the respondents vary with no single response being evident. that the lab builds upon previous lab activity was moderately
evident as well as the class repeats the same lab activity to
In addition, half of the CSU respondents indicated that enhance understanding and the class uses the same
they read directions while doing their high school chemistry equipment’s. The lab addresses belief about the world was
lab activities, the other half consisted of roughly equal weakly evident.
responses for reading the direction for the lab immediately
before starting, discuss the lab in detail during class before The amount of discussion after a laboratory activity
doing the lab, read the direction the night before and read and varies for FSUU respondents, with most of the respondents
discuss the directions in class a day before doing the lab. For saying that a whole class or more was devoted to the
FSUU respondents, the most evident preparation prior to a lab discussion. However, this constitutes only 30% of the
activity was a discussion of the details in class prior to the respondents and does not significantly outweigh that of the
conduct of the activity. other responses. For CSU respondents, a majority said that
only half of the class was spent for the discussion.
The levels of manifestation of different positive traits of a high school Chemistry teacher were given in Table 10. The responses
for both CSU and FSUU respondents were roughly consistent in the sense that all characteristics were found to be either evidence of
moderately evident.
Fig 1:- Academic Performance in Introductory College Chemistry of Respondents From CSU (Distribution By Grade)
Fig 2:- Academic Performance in Introductory College Chemistry of Respondents From CSU (Distribution By Pass or Fail Status)
Thirteen or 43.33% of CSU respondents failed in their Introductory College Chemistry Course. Among the 17 or 56.67% who
passed, a great majority obtained the minimum passing grade of 3.00 with 12 respondents, followed by 2.75 with three respondents.
The grades of 2.25 and 1.75 each obtained a single respondent, leaving the other grades unrepresented. This particular distribution of
grades implies that a regrouping of the categories was necessary in order to facilitate the interpretation of the tests for the significant
association that will follow. In particular, chi-square was likely to return unreliable results when at least of the categories has very few
observations. Table 10 shows regrouping of the categories into either pass or fail.
Fig 3:- Academic Performances in Introductory College Chemistry of Respondents from FSUU (Distribution By Pass or Fail Status)
Fig 4:- Academic Performances in Introductory College Chemistry of Respondents from FSUU (Distribution by Grade Intervals)
In FSUU, the grades in Introductory College Chemistry were given into two separate components, namely Lecture and
Laboratory. As such, these two components will be considered separately during analysis. None of the respondents from FSUU failed
the subject in either component, and the grades in laboratory tend to be higher than those in lecture. (This neither implies, however,
that FSUU respondents performed better than CSU respondents, nor that FSUU respondents are more adept in laboratory work than in
lecture.) Note also that in the FSUU grading system, more grades were possible since the increment was done by 0.10, as opposed to
0.25 which was used in CSU. Because of this, some grades were either underrepresented or do not have any respondents at all. This
calls, as with the case of CSU, for a regrouping of the categories, as shown in Table 10.
Table 11. Logistic Fit of Performance in Chemistry By Frequency of Use of Different Types of Technology
0.75
Pass
0.50
0.25
Fail
0.00
1 2 3 4 5
Mean Response
0.50 0.50
1.5-1.9
1.5-1.9
0.25 0.25
1.0-1.4
1.0-1.4
0.00 0.00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
The Chi-square values for both logistic fits were found to be not significant. For the case of CSU, the vertical curves that
separate the mean responses for the categories show that among those who passed or failed the subject, the proportion that has high
and low mean responses for the use of technology was not significantly different. The same observation was also evident among
FSUU respondents. This means that no sufficient evidence was found from the data to show any significant association between the
use of technology and performance in Introductory College Chemistry.
0.75
Pass
PASS
0.50
0.25
Fail
0.00
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
Mean Response
Chi-
FSUU P-value Interpretation
Square
Lec 0.23 0.63 Not Significant
Mean Response
Lab 1.85 0.17 Not Significant
1.00 1.00
2.5-2.9
2.0-2.4
0.75 0.75
bracket.lec 2.0-2.4
bracket.lab
0.50 0.50
1.5-1.9
1.5-1.9
0.25 0.25
1.0-1.4
1.0-1.4
0.00 0.00
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Mean Response Mean Response
Table 8. Above showed the logistic fit of performance in Chemistry by a frequency of selected Chemistry-related tasks. The
p-values larger than 0.05 implied that no sufficient evidence was found to determine any significant association between these two
variables.
Table 12. Contingency Analysis of Performance in Chemistry by Organization and Structure of High School Chemistry Course
Number of days the class meets in a week
Chi-square P-value Interpretation
CSU 1.37 0.71 Not Significant
FSUU Lec 2.33 0.51 Not Significant
Lab 1.30 0.52 Not Significant
Length of Chemistry Course
Chi-square P-value Interpretation
CSU 0 NA NA
FSUU 0 NA NA
A requirement for Learning the Material
Chi-square P-value Interpretation
CSU 2.98 0.56 Not Significant
FSUU Lec 16.54 0.17 Not Significant
Lab 12.65 0.12 Not Significant
Table 13. Contingency Analysis of Performance in Chemistry By Time Spent on Selected Chemistry Topics
Chi-square P-value Interpretation
CSU
Atoms and the Periodic Table 7.10 0.07 Not Significant
Chemical Reactions and Equations 4.72 0.19 Not Significant
Solutions 4.18 0.38 Not Significant
Gases and Gas Laws 1.69 0.64 Not Significant
Stoichiometry 1.73 0.78 Not Significant
Nuclear Reactions 0.27 0.97 Not Significant
Biochemistry 5.98 0.31 Not Significant
History and People of Chemistry 3.04 0.55 Not Significant
FSUU Chi-square P-value Interpretation
Lec 14.08 0.22 Not Significant
Atoms and the Periodic Table
Lab 17.96 0.00 Significant
Lec 10.16 0.34 Not Significant
Chemical Reactions and Equations
Lab 13.53 0.04 Significant
Lec 0.85 0.45 Not Significant
Solutions
Lab 15.36 0.02 Significant
Lec 11.41 0.49 Not Significant
Gases and Gas Laws
Lab 6.78 0.56 Not Significant
Lec 12.01 0.21 Not Significant
Stoichiometry
Lab 13.61 0.03 Significant
Lec 10.96 0.28 Not Significant
Nuclear Reactions
Lab 9.33 0.16 Not Significant
Lec 12.52 0.41 Not Significant
Biochemistry
Lab 9.87 0.27 Not Significant
Lec 22.37 0.22 Not Significant
History and People of Chemistry
Lab 21.25 0.05 Significant
On the previews results on time spent on selected chemistry topics, it was found that CSU respondents responded that they
meet five times a weeks and it shows that there's no significant association between performance in ICC and the time spent on the
selected topics. For FSUU respondents responded that only the laboratory has a significant association between time spent and
performance in ICC, opposed to the lecture which shows no significant association.
Table 14. Contingency Analysis of Performance in Chemistry By Experiences in Chemistry Laboratory Activities
Number of Labs Each Month
Chi-Square P-value Interpretation
CSU 16.37 0.68 Not Significant
FSUU Lec 18.94 0.12 Not Significant
Lab 16.64 0.08 Not Significant
Preparation Prior to Laboratory Activity
Chi-Square P-value Interpretation
CSU Read directions while doing the lab 4.03 0.10 Not Significant
FSUU Discussed the lab in detail Lec 19.73 0.07 Not Significant
during class before doing the lab Lab 12.57 0.13 Not Significant
As with most previous results no sufficient evidence was found to establish a significant association between performance in
ICC and the following indicators of experiences in high school chemistry laboratory activities: number of labs each month,
preparation prior to laboratory activity, characteristics of laboratory activity and amount of discussion after laboratory activity.
On the previous results in the characteristics of the HS chemistry teacher, the respondents of both schools responded that those
positive traits were being observed. The CSU result showed that the characteristics of the HS teacher have the significant association
with the academic performance in ICC. For the FSUU shows that the characteristics of the HS chemistry teacher have a significant
association with the academic performance with the in ICC in terms of lecture, in contrast with the laboratory which showed no
significant association.
Among all the variables identified the logistics fit of characteristics of high school chemistry teacher showed statistically
significant association with academic performance in ICC. For instance, a P-value of 0.05 for CSU respondents shown that it was
unlikely for the observed association to have occurred by chance. The logistic fit plot shows that the greater proportion of those who
passed the subject had HS chem. Teachers with high mean responses, i.e., high incidence of positive characteristics. The same
observation was true for grades in the lecture of FSUU students. Students, who belong to a numerically low-grade bracket, tend to
have high school chem. teachers with high or evident mean responses. On the other hand, no significant association was found for the
grade in a laboratory of FSUU respondents as shown by nearly vertical logistics curves.
Table 16. Showed that there was no significant association between the genders of the HS chemistry teacher to the performance of
ICC
Table 17. Contingency Analysis of Performance in Chemistry by Age of HS Chemistry Teacher
Chi-
Square P-value Interpretation
CSU 0.15 0.65 Not Significant
Lec 2.16 0.13 Not Significant
FSUU
Lab 3.02 0.22 Not Significant
Table 17. Showed that there was no significant association between the ages of the HS chemistry teacher to the performance
of ICC.