Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1
Background:
HIV among older people
• Limited data on HIV and aging in developing
countries
2
Background:
HIV among older people
• In Uganda HIV prevalence among 50-59 yrs
(5.8%), among 14-49 yrs (6.1%)
(The Uganda National Survey 2004-05)
6
Study objective
7
Study setting
8
Study design
• Cross sectional study design
• Participants drawn from different MRC population
cohort studies
Five study groups
• HIV infected
– Older persons who are HIV+ and are on ART for
more than a year
– Older persons who are HIV+ waiting to get on ART
or who are on ART for less than 3 months
• HIV affected
– Older persons who have lost an adult child due to
HIV/AIDS
– Older persons who have a sick HIV+ adult child
• Comparison group
– Older persons who are not HIV positive themselves
and do not have a child infected or dead due to 9
HIV/AIDS
Survey instruments
10
Results are preliminary
11
12
Results are preliminary
13
Scales/Measures reported in this
presentation:
• WHODAS (provides a profile of functioning
across six activity domains)
• Average grip strength (good predictor of mortality
risk in older ages)
• BMI
• Hypertension
• Social Network Index (SNI): based on marital
status, church and club membership, closeness
to friends, closeness to family
• WHOQoL: used 8 item index to assess the
quality of life including physical health,
psychological health, social relationships, and
14
environment
General Characteristics
Comparison
Mean age: 64.7 years
HIV positive younger:
0 50 100
59.0 years
15
WHODAS by age and sex
60
30
20
Poorer scores
from about 65-69
10
0
50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80+
16
WHODAS
multivariate regression analysis
• Model with age, sex, place of residence,
education and study groups
• Significant effects
– Age: older people, more disability (p=.000)
– Sex : women have poorer score (p.000)
– Education: higher Educ., better score (p=.005)
• Not Significant
– Residence
– Study group - HIV status; ART status; child with AIDS
17
Grip strength by age and sex
40
35
Men have better
Women
Men scores than
30
women at all ages
25
20
Almost linear decline
15
with age
10
5
Steeper slope of decline
0
50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80+
among men
18
Grip strength
multivariate regression analysis
• Model with age, sex, place of residence, education and
study group (and HIV/ART)
• Significant effects
– Age: lower strength at older ages (p=.000)
– Sex: women lower strength (p=.000)
– HIV & not on ART: less grip strength (p=.031)
• Not Significant
– Residence, education
– HIV and on ART
19
BMI by comparison group
15
Women Men
20
Hypertension by comparison group
50
45.6
Hypertension (systole>140
45 41.6
40.2 or diastole>90)
40
(multi-variate regression)
35
Significantly lower
30
prevalence:
25
19.6 - HIV+ (irrespective of ART),
20
- older age
13.7
15 - rural lower than urban
10 residents
5
0
HIV & ARV HIV, no ARV Child HIV Child HIV Comparison
died alive
21
WHOQoL
60
Multivariate regression
analysis
50
Significant effects
40 - SNI stronger: better quality
(p=.000)
30
- age: younger is better
20 (p=.001)
10
- HIV, ART: higher quality
(p=.013)
0
HIV & ARV HIV, no ARV Child HIV Child HIV Comparison
- education: higher is better
died alive
(p=.023)
Not significant
Lower score implies better quality of life - Sex; -HIV not on ART,
-AIDS in family
- urban rural
Social network index (SNI)
24
Acknowledgement:
Funders:
- WHO / NIA
- MRC, UK
- DFID (EfA consortium)
- CORDAID
Collaborators:
- TASO (Masaka & Entebbe)
- Entebbe district hospital
- The Community in Kyamulibwa sub-county
25