Sei sulla pagina 1di 71

LTE BEST

PRACTICES Insights to navigate the technology maze


LTE BEST PRACTICES:
Insights to navigate the technology maze

Table of Contents
Noise mitigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Interference mitigation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Co-siting existing technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
How to avoid PIM. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
FTTA implementation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Implementing DAS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Outdoor site construction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Selecting and deploying antenna technology. . . . 36
Voice over LTE (VoLTE) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Microwave backhaul. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
Fiber backhaul. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
C-RAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
Indoor small cells. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
Metro cells. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
MIMO implementation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
LTE: a new generation, a new set of rules. . . . . . . 70

2
Click the bubble next to the
LTE best practices: Authors author to read their bios and blogs.

Introduction: About LTE Noise mitigation Interference mitigation Co-Siting existing technology
Morgan Kurk Erik Lilieholm Ray Butler Rob Cameron

How to avoid PIM FTTA implementation Implementing DAS Outdoor site construction
Lou Meyer Chris Stockman Luigi Tarlazzi Mike Fabbri

Selecting and deploying Voice over LTE (VoLTE) Microwave backhaul Fiber backhaul
antenna technology Erik Lilieholm Donald Gardner Wes Oxlee
Mike Wolfe

C-RAN Indoor small cells Metro cell applications MIMO implementation


Pat Thompson Joshua Adelson Philip Sorrells Ray Butler
3
LTE best practices: Introduction

LTE continues
to gain relevance—and share—
in the modern wireless world

W hile many in Europe and North America have made LTE wireless
connectivity part of their daily lives, it is surprising to see how much
more potential exists for LTE in the rest of the world, and how much more
potential it could have in those parts of the world where it is already an
established technology. With great
It’s anticipated that 65 percent of the world will be covered by LTE by the year
2019, and, as performance increases, so do user expectations of ubiquitous
capacity comes
coverage and sufficient capacity. This endless demand is fueling not only the great challenges
global expansion of LTE into new markets, but also the ongoing evolution of LTE performance far outstrips
what LTE can deliver. anything possible from 2G and 3G
networks. However, it comes with a
new—or at least more prominent—
vulnerability to the effects of
interference. Network complexity,
tower load, and speed of deployment
also have an enormous impact on LTE
rollouts. For these reasons, wireless
operators must take extreme care in
their deployments to ensure that LTE
delivers on its promise. That’s what
these best practices are all about.
4
LTE best practices: Introduction

Interference and noise


One issue that will arise in many ways in this book is that of interference. Because
LTE networks (and their associated schemes LTE-A and LTE Pro) employ high-order
modulation schemes, the effect of any interference is magnified and even a small
amount can have performance-crippling effects. This interference may be external,
in the form of neighboring sectors or channels, or even weather radar; or it may be
internal, in the form of passive intermodulation (PIM) caused by moisture, improper
connections or damaged cable.
Interference has been an issue since the dawn of radio frequency (RF) technology.
However, as the complexity of the network increases, so does the effect of
interference and noise. Levels that may be perfectly acceptable in a 3G network
can bring an LTE network to a grinding halt. This is why LTE planning and execution
must take extra care in every stage of deployment.

Wireless data traffic has


increased by a factor of

400 MILLION
since the year 2000.
(Cisco VNI Mobile forecast,
February 2017)

5
LTE best practices: Introduction

Crowded tower tops


Increased complexity also takes the form of more crowded tower tops. To
increase network performance and electrical efficiency, remote radio units
(RRUs) are moving functionality from the shelter or cabinet at the base to the
top of the tower. In addition, the process of moving ever-greater amounts
of data on the LTE network necessitates more advanced backhaul solutions,
which are the means of getting a cell site’s traffic on and off the operator’s core
In 2015,
network. Often, this increased backhaul takes the form of large point-to-point LTE carried more
microwave antennas, also mounted at or near the tower’s peak.
These changes have introduced new challenges in the additional weight, wind
traffic worldwide
load and lease costs associated with such a crowded tower top. They also than 3G for the
take longer to deploy, slowing down crucial time to market. Because of this,
choosing the optimal technology and partners is critical. first time.

(Cisco VNI Mobile forecast,


February 2017)

6
LTE best practices: Introduction

What you need to know about Did you


know?
modernizing to LTE
You’ve probably heard about the eventual arrival of 5G, but the fact is
that, as of the beginning of 2017, 5G’s standards remain uncertain and a
formal definition remains in the indeterminate future. While it is expected
to start gaining traction in the market by 2020, there remains a vast amount
of untapped potential in LTE that continues to be revealed, innovation by Wireless traffic
innovation, over time.
We will see more improvements in LTE before 5G is ready for prime time,
growth is expected
and, for this reason, CommScope is delighted to share to increase six-fold
these best practices designed to help you deploy,
grow and improve your LTE network. by the year 2021.
(Ericsson Mobility report,
June 2016)

7
BEST PRACTICE
#
1 Noise mitigation

8
#1 best practice: Noise mitigation Fast facts
Why is noise an LTE challenge? What causes noise?
LTE’s growth is rooted in the ever- As a rule, noise has a wide array
growing demand for data speed and of sources. Noise emissions are
throughput. To meet this demand, generated by nearby electrical In 2017, there are
LTE technology uses a number of
methods and practices that can boost
machinery, radio equipment, or
electrical discharges caused by 581 commercial
capacity—but leave it susceptible to
stray interference.
poorly-connected RF components.
Even in properly-connected and
networks
Because optimal LTE performance maintained site infrastructure, base
requires a higher signal-to-noise ratio stations will pick up noise from
(SNR) than any previous technology, adjacent sectors. Indeed, noise is
noise can present a major obstacle to present in the active RF circuit’s
the smooth, efficient and profitable thermal noise floor—the wide-
operation of an LTE network. spectrum white noise emitted by
every electrical conductor.

operating in
186 countries.
What is noise?
Noise is a general term describing disruptive signals (LTE–GSA: Evolution to
within the radio channel. It is a kind of interference, LTE Report, January 2017)
but, because it consists of many signals, the additive
sum total is harder to isolate and counter than
single interference sources. Engineers refer to this
combined signal “cocktail party” as additive white
Gaussian noise (AWGN).

9
#1 best practice: Noise mitigation

Equipment Environmental Installation


selection practices practices

• Choose antennas with radiation • Regulate equipment temperature • Ensure that all coaxial
pattern envelopes (RPEs) that by allowing maximum air connections are tightened to
minimize sector overlap and circulation, and installing sun their specified torque in order
suppress coverage where it’s not shields where needed, such as to reduce the chance of noise-
desired, such as the upper floors in hot climates. generating electrical discharge.
of tall buildings.
• Identify likely noise sources • Follow all practices for proper
• Tower-mounted amplifiers offer (such as electric motors, power equipment grounding.
a simple, efficient way to improve converters and other nearby
SNR by offsetting feeder loss and electrical devices) and make sure • Do not exceed transmit power
reducing the uplink noise floor. they are grounded and shielded ratings of any component in the
where possible. RF path.
• Install interference mitigation filters
(IMFs) on nearby transmitters to • Carefully evaluate spurious • Make sure installers correctly
suppress out-of-band emissions emissions from co-located and handle components labeled as
that can cause noise. adjacent transmitter sites, then electrostatic sensitive.
place and point antennas to • Secure and protect cabling
• Always select equipment rated
maximize isolation from those to prevent strain, vibration or
to the specified operating
noise sources. environmental damage.
conditions.

10
#1 best practice: Noise mitigation
Additional resources
Training Blog Did you
The cost
of noise and
know?
the value of
SP6000
silence
Optimum LTE
Understanding the RF path
performance
Learn more Learn more
demands a
signal-to-noise
ratio (SNR) as
high as 20 dB.

11
BEST PRACTICE
#
2 Interference mitigation

12
#2 best practice: Interference mitigation Fast facts
Why is interference an What causes interference?
LTE challenge? Interference can be caused by
Distinct from the broadband nearby electrical equipment or
disruption of noise, interference is discharges in poorly-installed or It’s expected
a discrete issue more prevalent in
urban and suburban areas where
low-quality RF components or
passive intermodulation (PIM). Due that there will be
pattern-controlled antennas are
the norm.
to its prominence as an urban and
suburban issue, it can also be caused
4.6 billion LTE
Because LTE performance is so by improperly isolated antennas, subscriptions
significantly impacted by any adjacent sector signals, and high
kind of interference, the network’s multipath interference—that is,
noise-plus-interference ratio (SNIR) reflected signals arriving at different
must be higher than in any times via multiple paths.
previous technology.

worldwide by
What is interference? the end of 2022.
Interference is defined as discrete disruptive signals within a radio channel.
Unlike the more generalized nature of noise, these disruptions are called (Ericsson Mobility report,
“interference” when singular, identifiable sources are involved. Noise is June 2016)
covered in best practice 1.

13
#2 best practice: Interference mitigation

Equipment Environmental Installation


selection practices practices

• Antenna patterns should have • Plan against potential wind- and • Use a level for antenna elevation
low sector power ratios to ice-loading conditions by choosing alignment and GPS for azimuth
minimize overlap, and high upper sturdy antenna mounts. alignment—compasses are
sidelobe suppression to minimize unreliable around so much steel.
• Identify likely noise sources
coverage in unwanted directions.
(such as electric motors, power • In rooftop installations, ensure the
• Opt for electrical downtilt converters and other nearby elevation beam clears the parapet,
instead of mechanical downtilt, electrical devices) and make sure particularly when the antennas are
which can cause pattern they are grounded and shielded set back from the edge.
blooming on the horizon. where possible.
• To minimize PIM sources, tighten
• Remote electrical tilt (RET) is • Carefully evaluate signal levels coaxial connections to specified
required for LTE Self Organizing from co-located and adjacent torque and ensure proper
Network (SON) optimization. transmitter sites, then place grounding of all equipment.
and point antennas to maximize
• Select only 100 percent PIM- • Do not exceed transmit power
isolation from those interference
tested equipment that’s rated ratings of any equipment in the
sources.
for your intended operating RF path.
conditions. • Install interference mitigation
filters (IMFs) on receivers to • Protect cabling from strain,
suppress strong signals in adjacent vibration and environmental
frequency bands. damage by securing and
shielding it appropriately.

14
2 best practice: Interference mitigation
#

Additional resources
Training Infographic Did you
What
interference
sources can
know?
SP6000 affect your
Understanding the RF path network? Monthly
Learn more Learn more
GLOBAL
wireless data traffic
will reach
Blog Industry survey
30.6
The cost of Are your exabytes by the year
noise and
the value
callers getting
the service 2020
of silence they deserve?
(Cisco VNI Mobile forecast,
February 2017)
Learn more Learn more

15
BEST PRACTICE
#
3 Co-siting existing technology

16
#3 best practice: Co-siting existing technology Fast facts
What is co-siting? Why is co-siting an LTE challenge?
Co-siting, also called co-location, is LTE deployments must co-exist
the practice of sharing site resources with existing technologies, meaning The average global mobile
between base station radios. On a equipment will necessarily have to
practical level this generally means co-site with older network connection speed will
multiple technologies, radios and/or infrastructure. While this offers surpass 3 mbps by 2017.
channel elements sharing space on a some advantages, such as the
single tower. In some cases, it even ability to leverage a site’s existing
includes multiple operators sharing backhaul capacity, it can also
the same radio equipment and RF introduce additional time and cost as
path, separating services at the tower space becomes limited. Plus,
baseband unit (BBU) or switch. additional technologies introduce
the possibility of interference.
Cloud storage is expected
What co-siting options exist? to grow 28 percent by
Options are limited and dictated by circumstances. First and foremost, the site the year 2021.
must have tower space and load capacity. After that, options are determined
by other factors, such as whether LTE frequencies and technologies can be
combined with existing network infrastructure and how extensive the sharing
should be—from sharing a tower to sharing an entire RF path.
(Cisco VNI Mobile forecast,
February 2017)

17
3 best practice: Co-siting existing technology
#

Equipment Environmental Installation


selection practices practices

• Choose components designed • Before deployment, survey the • Use only certified installation
to minimize passive RF landscape to ensure that any crews that are familiar with
intermodulation (PIM) and interference you are likely to co-siting challenges.
test thoroughly for PIM after encounter can be adequately
installation. mitigated. • Combine technologies
based on frequencies that
• Install multiband antennas • Separate antennas vertically do not produce harmful PIM
to cover today’s needs and and horizontally to keep them products.
plan ahead for tomorrow’s from interfering with one
additional spectrum. another. • Build arrays of technologies
that use the same tilt, of
• To minimize interference • Orient antennas so they do not similar antennas that use the
resulting from co-sited encounter physical obstacles same azimuth, and on different
components, include near their main beams. antennas that use different
combining and filtering azimuths.
solutions that prevent • Isolate antennas from potential
adjacent-channel interference. sources of external interference
such as parapets, support
structures, guy wires or other
tower equipment.

18
3 best practice: Co-siting existing technology
#

Additional resources
Diagram Article Did you
How is
interference
impacting
How does
interference
impact your
know?
your network By 2022,
network? investment? there will be
Learn more Learn more
8.9B mobile
subscriptions

Video White paper 8B


mobile
broadband
and
Interference Densifying with grace: subscriptions
impacting
your
The resurgence of
RF conditioning
6.1B
unique
network KPIs? devices mobile
subscribers.
Learn more
(Ericsson Mobility report,
June 2016)
19
BEST PRACTICE
#
4 How to avoid PIM

20
#4 best practice: How to avoid PIM Fast facts
Why is PIM an LTE challenge? What causes PIM?
As LTE networks are overlaid PIM can be caused by any
on legacy 2G and 3G network nonlinearity in the RF path. Possible
infrastructure, interference becomes sources include poor connections,
a real challenge—particularly passive damaged cable or water infiltration. In Smartphone usage
intermodulation, or PIM. some cases, PIM can also be caused
PIM has been a known issue for as by objects outside the path, such as will increase to
light posts, buried conduit, fences
long as RF communications have
involved more than one component. or site equipment. In fact, there are comprise 80 percent
so many possible sources, PIM is
However, LTE is particularly sensitive
to its effects. sometimes known as “the rusty bolt of wireless data traffic
effect.”
by the year 2020.
(Cisco VNI Mobile forecast,
February 2017)
What is PIM?
PIM is interference resulting from the nonlinear mixing of two or
more frequencies in a passive circuit. If the interference coincides
with an LTE network’s uplink receive frequencies, it can cripple
network performance and throughput.

21
#4 best practice: How to avoid PIM

Equipment Environmental Installation


selection practices practices

• Use pre-tested, PIM- • Ensure the antenna system is • Ensure that installation
certified cable assemblies. clear and free of obstacles in technicians have the right
Connector-related PIM is its pattern direction. tools to prepare and connect
the most common source of cabling, including the
interference. • Be aware of frequency
connectors’ correct torque
sources in the immediate
specifications.
• Many older devices (antennas, area of the antenna system
diplexers, and so forth) were such as large machinery, • Minimize the number of
not designed to today’s high-voltage power lines and adapters used in the design of
higher PIM standards. Specify other sources that can create the RF path.
new, PIM-certified devices an unexpected frequency
with weather-resistant experience. • Use frequency sweep PIM
connections. testing to reveal problems
• A comprehensive site that fixed-frequency testing
• Verify that your suppliers’ audit can identify potential does not. If that is not an
testing protocols include external sources of PIM, such option, use multiple fixed
environmental stress as buried conduit, nearby frequencies to reveal hidden
screening and PIM testing metallic structures or other PIM.
in both static and dynamic issues. Such audits may also
conditions. Nothing is static include post-installation • Ensure all installers are trained
at the top of a tower. testing and mitigation. and certified.

22
4 best practice: How to avoid PIM
#

Additional resources
Training White paper Did you
• PIM testing
• Network
modernization:
know?
PIM
SP6160
• PIM in DAS
PIM most frequently
PIM/VSWR certification degrades receiver
Learn more Learn more
sensitivity at the
cell site.
Apps Just 1 dB lost to PIM
can reduce LTE
efficiency by 11 percent.
WebTrak®
and cTrak™
certified Read blog, “What is PIM”
report system
Learn more

23
BEST PRACTICE
#
5 FTTA implementation

24
#5 best practice: FTTA implementation Fast facts
What is FTTA, and how does What challenges exist in
it figure into LTE? FTTA architecture? 87 percent of
Fiber to the antenna (FTTA) wireless
site architecture is characterized by
FTTA sites call for both fiber-optic
and power cables to connect RRUs at
respondents
remote radio units (RRUs) and other the top of the tower. Running these have moved to
components located at the top of the as separate cables can be complex,
tower rather than at the traditional time-consuming, and expensive. FTTA, or plan to
base location. This configuration
allows for enhanced energy
Additionally, RRUs from different
OEMs feature different interfaces,
in the foreseeable future.
efficiency, increased bandwidth often requiring specific fiber and
and improved flexibility—all essential
ingredients for a successful LTE
power connectors.
79 percent of respondents
network. say that fiber technology
can benefit their
What strategies exist to overcome the challenges? brands by
Hybrid cable—a combination of fiber and power cable in a single
run—can greatly streamline installation and simplify site infrastructure.
improving their
Since a hybrid cable typically contains many fibers, one run can support service offerings.
multiple RRUs and even include extra fibers for future expansion. There
are also new factory-assembled, pretested solutions available that allow
installers to hoist all the key components into position as a single unit. (Broadband Outlook report,
October 2016)

Hybrid connectivity solutions can reduce


tower load by 33 percent.

25
#5 best practice: FTTA implementation

Equipment Environmental Installation


selection practices practices

• Choose hybrid cable capable of • Keep the provided dust caps on • Always clean and inspect
accommodating more RRUs than the ends of the fiber-optic cable connections before mating to
you are installing now—even if until the connection is actually prevent damage, ensure optimal
you don’t need that many made to ensure dust does not signal performance and reduce the
connections now, it will ease future settle on the fiber connector. time spent troubleshooting.
expansion at minimal up-front cost.
• More tower-top components • Handle and store hybrid cables
• When ordering cable, it’s always means more connections in an according to the manufacturer’s
best to order longer lengths to already-crowded location. Hybrid specifications.
accommodate for any breakout canisters eliminate
adjustments needed on-site. the need for a tower-mounted • Installation and testing of fiber-
junction box and minimize the optic cable should always be
• Select plug-and-play hybrid performed by skilled technicians.
amount of space required.
breakout systems that directly
connect RRU and BBU to • Harsh weather can affect • All cable must be actively
eliminate the need for additional connectors as well as cable, supported to within a distance of
cable runs or junction boxes reducing performance. Ensure no more than 1–2 feet (30–61 cm)
that increase tower loads. that you select weatherproofed of its connection point. As a
connectors rated for the general rule, hangers should
• Factory-terminated, factory- be spaced no more than 3–4 feet
environment.
tested hybrid cables offer better (0.9–1.2 m) apart.
quality control.

26
5 best practice: FTTA implementation
#

Additional resources
Training Video Apps
Fiber to the WebTrak®
antenna and cTrak™
turnkey certified
SP6170
solution report system
Fiber to the antenna (FTTA)
Learn more Learn more Learn more

White paper Brochure Article


Technical keys HELIAX FiberFeed
HELIAX®
to network Direct Hybrid
FiberFeed
modernization: connectivity
Direct
FTTA solution

Learn more Learn more Learn more

27
BEST PRACTICE
#
6 Implementing DAS

28
#6 best practice: Implementing DAS Fast facts
How does DAS fit into LTE? What is DAS?
Distributed antenna systems (DAS) A DAS is a network of distributed Well suited to high-density
allow operators to offload wireless antennas specifically designed to add user environments
traffic from a particularly user-dense coverage and capacity to areas of
environment from the macro network. buildings and venues where boosted
DAS is also an effective way of service is needed. This distributed Built off a network of remote
bringing reliable, high-quality LTE data capacity is connected via vertical fiber access nodes connected via
service to hard-to-cover areas, such backbone to a headend, usually on fiber to the headend
as large office buildings or hospitals; the premises, which then connects to
across sprawling college campuses the carrier equipment and the broader
or airports; around massive sports network.
May be low-power (indoor),
stadiums; or underground subways or Regarding LTE in particular, DAS high-power (outdoor), or a
parking garages. allows for the addition of a new combination
capacity layer without building new
macro network infrastructure.

DAS popularity has grown


with increase in LTE demand

Why is DAS important?


In its earliest incarnations, DAS was regarded as a difficult-to-deploy solution
suited only to specific installations. With the explosion in LTE demand,
however, DAS has evolved into a critical part of the larger network.

An average user spends 85 percent of smart


phone time on apps—and 84 percent of that
time on just five apps.

(2015 U.S. Mobile App report, September 2015) 29


#6 best practice: Implementing DAS

Equipment Environmental Installation


selection practices practices

• Choose a DAS solution with • When designing your DAS, map • Plan for the future. Allow extra
remote units that are capable DAS zones according to the space for future upgrades in telco
of multiband support, ideally demand they will have to serve. closets and headend room.
supporting all main commercial This will determine the number
bands. and sizes of your zones. • Clean fiber connectors
thoroughly during installation.
• DAS solutions can be time- • Use single-cell simulcast in large, Even the smallest particles of
and labor-intensive to install, open areas to reduce the number dust can degrade performance.
commission and optimize. Make and size of handover areas.
sure to choose a solution that • Know and observe the maximum
• Building materials, wall power ratings of all components.
simplifies and streamlines these
configurations and internal
processes and one that requires
partitions will all affect RF
less-specialized labor to deploy.
propagation. Know the terrain and
• Select factory-tested, PIM-rated composition of the venue your
passive devices between remote DAS will serve.
units and antennas to maximize
performance.

30
6 best practice: Implementing DAS
#

Additional resources
Blog Blog Did you
The value
of multiples
in DAS
Why permit
a preventable
weakness in
know?
The average
your DAS?
smartphone will generate
Learn more Learn more

White paper Blog


PIM requirements
must increase to
PIM requirements
must increase to
4.4 GB of traffic
per month by 2020, a five-fold
support evolving support evolving increase over 2015 levels.
DAS systems DAS systems
(Cisco VNI Mobile forecast,
February 2017)
Learn more Learn more

31
BEST PRACTICE
#
7 Outdoor site construction

32
#7 best practice: Outdoor site construction Fast facts
How do site construction practices How are cell sites built?
relate to LTE? Cell site construction involves a great A complex process involving
LTE performance depends on having number of partners and stages of several specialized partners
the right infrastructure in the right development—even more so for LTE
places. While many LTE deployments deployments that have more exacting
involve adding technology to existing specifications. Once the site location LTE performance depends
macro cell sites alongside 2G and has been chosen, surveyed and
on specific methods of
3G infrastructure, there are still secured, an operator must choose a
opportunities to construct entirely service company to erect the physical
construction and deployment
new sites in areas with growing structure of the site.
demand and population density. Then the operator must identify
vendors to supply the infrastructure Service companies build the
that will power the LTE site. This structure of the site
includes: cable connectivity, backhaul
infrastructure, remote electrical tilt
(RET) articulators and other sector-
shaping technology, antennas and Vendors provide infrastructure
other active components. and active components

Touches on multiple business


considerations: legal, strategic,
financial and others
What’s on the line with new site construction for LTE?
Construction is a complex process that involves many different priorities
and players. There are legal and zoning issues to consider; geographical and
topographical factors; risk and liability considerations; and, of course, the
matter of providing LTE coverage where you need to have it.

33
#7 best practice: Outdoor site construction

Equipment Environmental Installation


selection practices practices

• As with any LTE deployment, a • Survey the prospective cell site • Ensure the azimuth is accurate
new site demands precise pairing to ensure it is geographically and and that both mechanical and
of components. Consider factory- topographically advantageous, electrical tilt are set to match the
tested, preterminated coaxial and and that all permits and consents site’s plan.
hybrid connectivity solutions to can be obtained.
reduce errors and deployment • New tower-top solutions
• Ensure that all components exist that are pre-assembled,
times.
feature appropriate configured and tested in a
• Maintain consistency by weatherproofing for their factory before hoisting it as a
manufacturer for component types location and specification. This single unit to the tower top,
to ensure continuity and quality includes cables, connectors saving time and money.
across the installation of hybrid or and all outdoor tower-mounted
coaxial cable. components. • Observe the cable
manufacturer’s bend radius
• Passive intermodulation (PIM) is a • Proper electrical grounding is specifications and use the
constant threat to LTE performance. essential. A typical site should be manufacturer’s hangers and
Always select PIM-tested grounded at the tower top and supports to avoid damage during
components for site deployments. base, and just outside the access installation.
point of the site’s outbuilding,
• Ensure that the people constructing • Fiber-optic installations are a
shelter or cabinet.
your site are reputable, well insured recent technology, requiring a
and fully certified in the kind of new generation of highly-trained
construction they will perform. specialists to handle.
34
7 best practice: Outdoor site construction
#

Additional resources
Training Blog Did you
How to
make a
standardized
know?
SP6000 tower top
Understanding the RF path
Learn more Learn more

By 2022, the traffic


generated by
smartphones is expected
to grow 10-fold.
(Ericsson Mobility report,
June 2016)

35
BEST PRACTICE
#
8 Selecting and deploying
antenna technology

36
#8 best practice: Fast facts
Selecting and deploying antenna technology
Enhanced sector power
Why does antenna type matter so How are LTE antennas designed ratio and upper sidelobe
much in LTE? to improve performance? suppression increase LTE
In order to provide LTE-level capacity, LTE antennas are built to provide capacity
antennas must support higher precise sector-by-sector coverage
modulation schemes than were with optimal signal-to-interference-
required by 2G and 3G networks. plus-noise ratio (SINR). Their LTE requires clean sector
Modulation compresses data, specifications include such key
handoffs
improving throughput but increasing characteristics as:
interference sensitivity. • Horizontal and vertical
LTE also requires antennas with beamwidths
LTE antennas improve SINR
optimal RF containment to prevent • Pattern roll-off characteristics through tighter radiation
sector overlap, because it does not
support soft handoffs.
• Upper sidelobe suppression pattern controls and PIM
• Front-to-back ratio management
• Port-to-port isolation
• PIM performance
MIMO, RET and other
technologies factor in as well

What factors should go into antenna selection?


There are several strategic considerations involved in your choice. Consider High-quality LTE antennas are
your current—and future—spectrum plans, and ensure your choice designed to deliver upper sidelobe
supports them all. Look at the antenna’s support for migration to advanced suppression, focusing more power
technologies to ensure you can scale capacity and coverage as needed. where it’s needed and reducing
Understand the environment where the antenna will be deployed, and, of sector overlap.
course, choose a solution from an experienced, reliable supplier with a solid
track record and warranty protection.

37
#8 best practice: Selecting and deploying antenna technology

Equipment Environmental Installation


selection practices practices

• Choose remote electrical tilt • Towers should be analyzed • Follow vendor and network
(RET)-capable antennas to for structural loading by a operator procedures for antenna
quickly optimize your network. professional engineer prior to commissioning, such as system
antenna installation. To ensure sweeps, PIM testing, RET
• Ensure that your chosen solution
structural integrity, use only configuration and RF connector
has undergone interoperability
manufacturer-specified antenna torque levels.
testing with your radio platforms.
mounts that are properly
torqued. • Ensure proper weatherproofing
• During the planning phase, use
of antenna RF connections,
network planning tools to ensure
• Observe radiation hazard preferably with a
network KPIs are met in your
warnings to ensure that weatherproofing solution
specific deployment scenario.
personnel are not exposed to provided by the antenna
• Look for antenna solutions that harmful levels of RF exposure. manufacturer.
support multiband capability,
• When upgrading an existing • Do not weatherproof RET
2x4/4x4 MIMO and offer
deployment, remember connections, but apply silicone
sufficient ports to support local
that replaced antennas grease supplied with the RET
RF plumbing.
should be disposed of in an cables to the connector pins
environmentally responsible prior to connecting the cables.
manner.

38
8 best practice: Selecting and deploying antenna technology
#

Additional resources
Training Video Tip sheet
Ultra- Top five tips
wideband for optimizing
SP6910
solutions network
Antenna theory performance
Learn more Learn more Learn more

White paper Training


Improving
metro cell
performance SP6104
RET antenna systems
Learn more Learn more

39
BEST PRACTICE
#
9 Voice over LTE (VoLTE)

40
#9 best practice: Voice over LTE (VoLTE) Fast facts
What is VoLTE? What does VoLTE offer to the
broader LTE strategy? VoLTE uses super-efficient
Voice over LTE (VoLTE) is the
codecs to carry voice over LTE
technology that allows voice calls to For wireless operators and
networks instead of legacy
be carried over LTE networks. It may enterprises running their own in-
2G/3G networks
surprise you to learn that your voice building wireless solutions, VoLTE
data doesn’t necessarily travel on offers a unified solution that allows Most major wireless operators
the same LTE network as your other for the final phasing out of older- began to introduce VoLTE
wireless data, but it’s true. Cellular generation networks. This is because capability into new devices in
voice calls are still often carried on VoLTE offers much greater spectral 2014
3G networks running in tandem efficiency—up to 15 times the
with LTE. number of simultaneous users per VoLTE offers call quality at least
New technology is changing all that, MHz compared to 2G. on par with 3G, with much
allowing voice to be carried efficiently For users, VoLTE offers greatly greater energy efficiency and
on LTE networks, using advanced improved call quality and enhanced quicker connections.
codecs (encoding/decoding software) connection reliability. The best results
in wireless devices, not unlike the come when mobile devices on each VoLTE is also sometimes
way conventional voice over IP (VoIP) end of the call are both using VoLTE. marketed as HD Voice or
negotiates signals between landline Video calls can also be made using Enhanced Voice, as it uses a
phones and the internet to carry video over LTE (ViLTE). vocoder that gives enhanced
voice calls. voice quality
It can maintain this increased quality
even under poor signal conditions— When both ends of the
The number of worldwide and even under heavy network load. connection use VoLTE-capable
VoLTE subscriptions will For these reasons, major wireless devices, HD Voice is used.
reach 3.3 billion by 2022. operators began introducing VoLTE
technology in their top-of-the-line VoLTE video calls (ViLTE) may
(Ericsson Mobility report, devices in 2014 and continue to count toward a user’s data AND
June 2016) include it today. voice limits at the same time

41
#9 best practice: Voice over LTE (VoLTE)

Did you
What are the challenges of using VoLTE?
There are very few downsides to VoLTE for operators and enterprises,

know?
since it enables the re-allocation of 3G and 2G spectrum and can reduce
OpEx associated with maintaining parallel networks. For the user, the
biggest challenge is accurately accounting for data and voice usage.
One key challenge is the inherent complexity of VoLTE in how calls are
set up and transmitted. It uses a hierarchy of services that must all be
coordinated to deliver defined QoS. A VoLTE call is essentially an IP
session rather than traditional circuit-switched call. This, in turn, depends
on other services to maintain performance, like the radio network and the
It’s estimated that one
individual devices being used to connect. There are also some unresolved minute of VoLTE video
standards regarding how roaming and inter-network calls are handled,
potentially introducing unexpected data costs for the user. calling consumes 6–8 MB
of data in addition to the
MMTel
IMS minute of talk time.
Evolved Evolved
packet packet
core IP core
LTE LTE

There are currently more


than 102 commercial VoLTE
networks in 54 countries.

(LTE–GSA: Evolution to
LTE Report, January 2017)

42
#9 best practice: Voice over LTE (VoLTE)

Equipment Environmental Installation


selection practices practices

• Cell edge coverage is • Low-band frequencies are • Proper antenna alignment is critical
especially important for VoLTE preferred for VoLTE, providing to optimizing the call quality,
performance. Consider higher better indoor penetration and connection reliability and energy
gain antennas to boost signal connection stability. efficiency of VoLTE services.
strength and reduce interference.
• Activate optimization features such • Drive test and optimize coverage
• Implement four-way receive as header compression and TTI and handover parameters to
diversity (4R) to improve uplink bundling. enhance voice quality and minimize
coverage at the cell edge. call drops and handovers to
• Include QoS monitoring solutions
2G/3G. A self-optimizing network
• Further enhance uplink that can capture session-based
(SON) solution can be effective in
performance by using tower- data and signaling information to
maintaining VoLTE performance as
mounted amplifiers. better understand network impact
the network evolves.
on VoLTE performance.

43
9 best practice: Voice over LTE (VoLTE)
#

Additional resources
Blog Blog Blog
The move to 4X2 The resurgence Japan—
MIMO in wireless of RF capacity
networks conditioning challenges
devices in a mature
LTE network
Learn more Learn more Learn more

Video Article

VoLTE
Today's most
inspiring Is your
technology? infrastructure
The network. in for a VoLTE of shock?

Learn more Learn more

44
BEST PRACTICE
#
10 Microwave backhaul

45
#10 best practice: Microwave backhaul Fast facts
What backhaul challenges are What is backhaul?
specific to LTE networks? Backhaul is the aggregation of An aggregated, line-of-sight
LTE networks exist to serve the a cell site’s traffic—voice and microwave signal connects
skyrocketing demand for data. As a data, transmitting and receiving— a cell site to the network’s
result, the backhaul needed to move condensed into a single data stream backbone via one or more
such massive amounts of data calls connecting the cell site to the links
for a solution of greater capacity network’s backbone.
and performance than was needed The data-intensive demands of ETSI Class 4-compliant
for previous generations of mobile LTE networks mean backhaul must
networks.
antennas greatly improve
support higher traffic capacities than backhaul performance and
earlier networks. Globally, the most
efficiency over Class 3
common and cost-effective way to
achieve this is using microwave radios
to provide the connectivity between Lower sidelobes and better
sites. interference discrimination
improve backhaul
performance

Smaller backhaul antennas


kg reduce tower weight, wind
load and costs

46
#10 best practice: Microwave backhaul

Did you
What challenges exist to effective backhaul?
Because backhaul networks rely on precise, line-of-sight connections

know?
between distant antenna dishes, misalignment due to installation errors
or structurally inadequate towers can greatly reduce link efficiency. In
addition, interference from poorly-planned adjacent networks can degrade
link performance.
Fortunately, recent advances in microwave antenna design have given
rise to cost-effective antennas that are compliant to the ETSI Class 4
specification. These antennas have greatly enhanced radiation pattern
envelopes (RPEs) with lower sidelobes, allowing these antennas to support
Backhaul matters because
higher modulation schemes and, hence, increased data throughput. The mobile data is expected to
superior RPEs also give better immunity from interference, improved
spectrum reuse and, consequently, the ability to deploy far more links in a increase eight-fold between
given area—critical for the high cell density of an LTE network.
2016 and 2022.
(Ericsson Mobility report,
June 2016)

47
#10 best practice: Microwave backhaul

Equipment Environmental Installation


selection practices practices

• Always choose quality and • When designing a new microwave • Rain, snow and other precipitation
proper specification over price. backhaul path, consider potential can degrade microwave links.
While less-expensive antennas interference sources. The planned Careful link design and choice of
may save a little money up front, link must not interfere with suitable frequencies can mitigate
the purchase itself is a small part adjacent links or other operators in the effects of bad weather.
of the total cost of ownership the area.
• Weather also affects a microwave
when operational expenses are
• Microwave links require line-of- installation’s physical integrity.
considered.
sight clearance. There can be no Accumulation of snow or ice adds
• Compliant Class 4 antennas obstructions between transmitter weight, which must be accounted
provide more link availability, and receiver, including the for in the site’s design.
more capacity, and more curvature of the Earth.
• Ensure your equipment is rated
efficient use of spectrum. Smaller
• Towers and mounting points must to withstand the maximum wind
antennas may be able to be
be capable of supporting the speed likely to be found at the site
deployed, reducing shipping and
antenna without deflecting, even location and installation height.
tower lease costs.
under wind speeds approaching
• Ensure that the tower has a
• Avoid third-party add-ons that the survival rating of the antenna.
good grounding system and
have never been qualified with
• Ensure that antennas are all components are correctly
the antenna.
installed in accordance with the grounded.
manufacturer’s instructions and
that all hardware is correctly
tightened.
48
10 best practice: Microwave backhaul
#

Additional resources
Training Tip sheet Matrix
Top five tips for Choosing the
optimizing right backhaul
microwave antenna: Four
SP6105
Microwave radio antenna backhaul quality key factors
link fundamentals of service (QoS) that drive TCO
Learn more Learn more Learn more

White paper Video Article


Sentinel® antennas Why Top three
address growing microwave antenna-related
capacity challenge antenna side limiters to
in today’s microwave lobes matter backhaul
backhaul network capacity

Learn more Learn more Learn more

49
BEST PRACTICE
#
11 Fiber backhaul

50
#11 best practice: Fiber backhaul Fast facts
What is FIBER backhaul and how Why does fiber backhaul matter in
is it different from MICROWAVE LTE networks? 80 percent of wireless
backhaul? Simply put, fiber offers incredible traffic originates from
As shown in best practice 10, potential that operators can put
microwave backhaul moves to work right away. It also has the
indoors, yet only 2
aggregated voice and data traffic capacity to support fast-approaching percent of commercial
from a local connection point—that new technologies. Dedicated fiber spaces have dedicated
is, an antenna and radio—on and backhaul infrastructure delivers
off the core network via focused, high capacity without microwave in-building wireless
point-to-point microwave backhaul’s distance limitations, solutions like small cells.
transmissions that “hop” from one which can occur when the signal is
antenna to the next until it reaches converted between links. The capacity (Wireless In Buildings report,
the central office. Fiber backhaul of a fiber can be further increased February 2016)
accomplishes this same task via a by multiplexing, a simple technique
high-speed, low-latency fiber-optic that pushes multiple channels
network instead. (wavelengths) down a single fiber.
Deployments of small
cells in public and
commercial spaces are
What are the challenges of using fiber backhaul in LTE networks? expected to grow 66
From an initial investment standpoint, deploying new dedicated fiber percent by 2021.
backhaul can be an expensive option, as the cabling, installation and labor
involved can present high up-front costs, particularly as compared to using (Small cell deployments and
microwave antennas. However, over the long term, fiber offers lower installed base 2015-2020, 2016)
total cost of ownership (TCO) due to its high capacity, adaptability to new
technologies, and its higher reliability.

51
#11 best practice: Fiber backhaul

Equipment Environmental Installation


selection practices practices

• Choose fiber-optic closures and • In locations where it is too • Where financially feasible, install
panels that offer both superior expensive to add fiber cables, fiber counts within your cable in
fiber management and are also consider utilizing passive order to provide vital additional
user friendly both to install wavelength division multiplexing capacity for future applications
on day one and to work on (WDM), an affordable way to run like 5G, cell site densification and
subsequently. several feeds simultaneously on a IoT applications.
single fiber in an already-installed
• Plug-and-play connectivity • Observe minimum bend radius
cable. This helps existing fiber
solutions are key to long-term and support ratings of the cable
carry more traffic.
flexibility and cost-effective used in order to prevent damage.
network rollouts. • Passive WDM solutions allow
for multiplexing without the • Source fiber-optic infrastructure
• Consider using solutions offering from one manufacturer to
expense of additional power and
value-added modules (VAMs) streamline installations, help
space requirements at the remote
that simplify access to your establish repeatable processes
location.
fiber, for easier monitoring and reduce costs.
and troubleshooting with the
addition of small, plug-and-play
remote devices.

52
11 best practice: Fiber backhaul
#

Additional resources
Brochure Brochure Did you
Fiber-optic
connectivity
Think Fiber.
Think CommScope.
know?
solutions for CommScope’s market
wireless backhaul analysis shows North
infrastructure
American wireless
Learn more Learn more
operators are deploying
more than 15 million feet

White paper Blog of fiber per year.

90 percent believe
Introducing the CommScope advanced fiber will
NG4access® ODF definitions: be fundamental to
platform What is fiber enabling 5G.
network
convergence? (Broadband Outlook report,
October 2016)
Learn more Learn more

53
BEST PRACTICE
#
12 C-RAN

54
#12 best practice: C-RAN Fast facts
What is C-RAN—and what is C-RAN? What do both kinds of C-RAN
C-RAN is shorthand for two distinct but mean to LTE networks? C-RAN actually describes two
related concepts, centralized radio access Regarding centralized RAN, taking concepts: centralized radio
networks and cloud-based radio access BBUs away from the cell site access networks and cloud-
networks. reduces the amount of equipment based radio access networks
Centralized RAN is a revolutionary architecture needed at the site, which reduces
now being deployed in the field. Its high- complexity, latency and site space
speed, low-latency fiber infrastructure removes leasing costs. Centralized RAN moves RF
the baseband unit (BBU) from the cell site to Cloud-based RAN simplifies processing from the cell site
a shared, centralized location. Here, it shares network management and makes to a shared central location
space with BBUs from other sites to connect it possible to more efficiently pool
to the core network. and coordinate network resources
This arrangement is necessary for cloud- to improve network performance Cloud-based RAN removes
based RAN, wherein the functions of these and reliability. Both are regarded as BBUs altogether by virtualizing
BBUs can be virtualized in affordable, readily- important parts of a successful 5G their function in data center
available servers located in central offices and network strategy in the years ahead. servers
BBU pooling locations.

What are the challenges of deploying C-RAN? Both benefit from the remote
Selection and provisioning of the fronthaul technology—the link between the BBU BBU or server farm in a
and the cell site—is one of the biggest challenges when deploying C-RAN. Network location nearest the cell edges
operators will need to consider a number of possible methods, such as: for maximum efficiency
• Traditional point-to-point microwave
• High-throughput millimeter wave (mmWave)
• Dedicated fiber (sometimes called “dark fiber” because it
is not being used for something else first)
• Wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM) that combines multiple
signals on a single fiber
• Existing passive optical networks (PON)
Another challenge is identifying and securing ideally-placed network-edge data
centers where they will be most efficient and reduce interference.
55
#12 best practice: C-RAN

Equipment Environmental Installation


selection practices practices

• Since C-RAN hub locations must • To efficiently connect cell sites, • Intuitive, plug-and-play
manage a large amount of fiber, use environmentally-hardened connection to hardened
ensure you select fiber frames and optical connectors to protect adapters on terminals or closures
panels that offer superior cable against extreme temperature, decreases installation and
management and ease of use moisture, UV, chemical exposure maintenance hours by minimizing
and other harsh conditions splicing required in outside plant
• In locations where fiber is in short
typically found in the outside networks
supply for the fronthaul link,
plant
WDM solutions can provide a • All fibers should be protected
quick fix to fiber shortage issues • C-RAN BBU pooling allows for throughout the network from
lower energy consumption and accidental damage by technicians
• Optical distribution frame
reduced OpEx and CapEx costs and equipment
(ODF) systems should allow for
upgradeable passive elements • Consider smaller terminals, which • The best networks are built to be
and optical modules for a “build take up less space on a pole, not only reliable, but also flexible,
as you grow” model hand-hole, side of a building, or expandable, and—most of all—
wherever else they are installed adaptable to whatever changing
technology may require

56
12 best practice: C-RAN
#

Additional resources
Blog Blog Did you
CommScope
definitions:
What is WDM? know?
What is C-RAN More than half of
respondents see reduced
CapEx and simpler
Learn more Learn more architecture as the biggest
benefits of C-RAN adoption.
(Broadband Outlook report,

Article Brochure
October 2016)

WDM makes Fiber optic C-RAN users enjoy


C-RAN affordable connectivity improved battery life
for network solutions for because their devices only
operators wireless backhaul have to track a single cell.
infrastructure
(Virtualizing the Cell,
Learn more Learn more May 2016)

57
BEST PRACTICE
#
13 Indoor small cells

58
#13 best practice: Indoor small cells Fast facts
What are indoor small cells—and How do indoor small cells fit into
how are they different from DAS? the larger LTE picture? Indoor small cells are best for
As their name suggests, indoor small Indoor small cells provide localized smaller structures where DAS
cells are designed to bring wireless coverage in structures that are is not practical or economical
connectivity to an indoor area, rather poorly served by the macro network
than a swath of outdoor space (we outside due to location, user density Indoor small cells have their
cover outdoor small cells in best or materials used in the building’s own integrated base station—
practice 14). Unlike DAS, indoor small construction. Indoor small cells are
unlike DAS, which uses a third-
cells include fully-functioning base particularly suited to medium-sized
stations that connect to an operator’s structures such as office buildings,
party solution to connect to
core network. DAS uses a third-party small arenas, hospitals and schools the macro network
base station instead. where DAS may not be economical.
Cloud radio access network
(Cloud RAN) is a new indoor
What are the challenges of indoor small cells?
small cell technology that
Indoor small cells are typically less expensive to purchase and easier to eliminates cell border
install than DAS solutions, but they lack the capacity available in a high-end
interference, greatly improving
DAS. Also, small cells are operator specific, so multi-operator deployments
deployment economics
require redundant infrastructure.
and QoS.
In a high-density deployment, the large number of individual small cells
required to serve the space can lead to interference-causing areas of cell
overlap. This reduces voice quality and data throughput, and forces frequent Did you
know?
handovers as users move about the building. One way to address this
challenge is with cloud radio access network (C-RAN) small cells, in which
the access points are centrally coordinated to form a single “super cell” that
removes sector boundaries altogether for better performance and QoS for
the user. C-RAN small cells are also simpler and less expensive to deploy. A C-RAN indoor small cell system can
serve a venue up to a million square
feet with thousands of users.

59
#13 best practice: Indoor small cells

Equipment Environmental Installation


selection practices practices

• Standalone small cells are a good • Aesthetics matter with indoor • The wireless operator’s
choice for smaller environments spaces. Access points should be management system is a vital
such as restaurants, retail shops attractive and unobtrusive. They part of the deployment. It
or branch offices. C-RAN small should be plenum-rated so they accelerates provisioning and
cells are for larger environments can be installed above a hung optimization and simplifies
such as hotels, shopping malls ceiling, if desired. ongoing management of an
and office buildings. indoor small cell deployment.
• Choose ruggedized options for
• C-RAN solutions eliminate cell environmentally unprotected • With some solutions, Power
borders by creating a single areas like parking lots, courtyards over Ethernet (PoE) can be used
“super cell” for the entire and entryways. to provide both power and data
network. This eliminates connectivity to each indoor small
interference so users enjoy good cell access point.
connections throughout the
covered space.
• Some indoor small cell solutions
can run on standard Ethernet
cabling and switches—an
economical and IT-friendly way
to deploy.

60
13 best practice: Indoor small cells
#

Additional resources
Web page Web page Web page
C-RAN OneCell® Plug and play
small cells C-RAN with OneCell
small cell DMS
system

Learn more Learn more Learn more

Web page Video Video


What are OneCell Cell
C-RAN small explained virtualization
cells? with OneCell

Learn more Learn more Learn more

61
BEST PRACTICE
#
14 Metro cells

62
#14 best practice: Metro cells Fast facts
What are metro cells? What makes a metro cell different
Metro cells are a part of the larger from ordinary macro sites? Metro cells are considered
family of small cell solutions used Metro cells are small, unobtrusive microcells, a subset of the small
to enhance coverage and capacity outdoor cell installations. They cell ecosystem of solutions
in densely-populated areas where provide the same kind of coverage
adding macro network infrastructure and capacity as a traditional cell site, Metro cells are designed to
is impractical. They include femtocells but are designed to blend into their blend with their surroundings
(small “hotspots” serving a house- environment and become almost
to provide coverage and
sized area), picocells (serving from invisible. Only a few feet tall, metro
50 to 100 users in a larger area), cells can be mounted on light poles,
capacity in more regulated
and microcells (indoor or outdoor rails, rooftops and other low-cost, spaces
sites that work like a macro site, but close-to-demand locations in urban
smaller). locations, earning them the name Being small and light, metro
Metro cells are an example of a “metro cell.” This is a big advantage as cells can be deployed on light
microcell architecture, with many many local jurisdictions enforce strict poles, railings, rooftops or other
unique advantages in how they can limits on size, weight and appearance
low-cost lease spots
be deployed and operated. on outdoor sites.

Metro cells are complete,


What macro LTE network features power metro cells? integrated LTE-capable
Metro cells distinguish themselves from other small cell solutions in that sites that share macro site
their small form factor still includes a complete, integrated LTE-capable advantages of multi-operator,
system, including customizable antennas, radomes, backhaul solutions and multi-tech and RET-optimized
power solutions. They support multiple operators and multiple technologies. service
Perhaps most importantly, they also feature capacity-optimizing technology
like remote electrical tilt (RET) that is otherwise generally found only in
macro LTE site deployments. RET allows the antennas to be adjusted
remotely to maximize coverage, boost reliability and reduce interference
with other sectors.

63
#14 best practice: Metro cells

Equipment Environmental Installation


selection practices practices

• Choose antennas with patterns • Choose a design that blends in • Perform a proper structural
that minimize sector overlap in with the surrounding area to analysis (wind loading, terrain
the azimuth (horizontal) plane. improve chances of trouble-free category, foundations, soil type
permitting. and so forth) prior to installation.
• Ensure that antennas have
electrical downtilt, allowing for • Attempt to utilize convection- • Identify all sources of PIM
fine-tuning coverage and a sharp cooled designs in order to and leverage antenna nulls to
cell edge. minimize noise. minimize or eliminate its effects.
• Select antennas with maximum • Ensure that energy-efficient • Ensure RF connectors
upper sidelobe suppression practices are followed are properly torqued and
available to avoid interference. throughout the deployment. waterproofed to manufacturer
specifications.
• Choose a combiner that covers
both bands used by diplexers and • Ensure all equipment is bonded
splitters. properly and equipped with
surge suppression where
required.
• Secure and protect cabling
to prevent strain, vibration or
environmental damage.

64
14 best practice: Metro cells
#

Additional resources
White paper Video Did you
Improving
metro cell
CommScope’s
integrated
know?
performance Metro Cell
with electrical downtilt and solution LTE will account for more
upper sidelobe suppression than 40 percent of all
Learn more Learn more connections—the largest
share of the market—and
72 percent of all wireless
Video Success story traffic by the year 2020.

(Cisco VNI Mobile forecast,


CommScope’s Ooredoo Tunisia February 2017)
Metro Cell turns to
solution delivers CommScope for
superior value and cost rapid-deployment
efficiency from day one. concealment solutions
Learn more Learn more

65
BEST PRACTICE
#
15 MIMO implementation

66
#15 best practice: MIMO implementation Fast facts
What is MIMO? Why does MIMO matter
Multiple-input, multiple-output in LTE networks? MIMO works by transmitting
(MIMO) is a technique that uses MIMO offers an innovative, low-cost and receiving simultaneously
multiple transmit and receive way to increase capacity and coverage, multiple data streams over
antennas to greatly increase the a critical advantage to fast-growing multiple antennas to increase
capacity and coverage of a cell LTE networks. By installing MIMO- channel capacity
site. MIMO exploits multipath supporting radios, an existing site can
propagation to simultaneously be upgraded to 2x2 MIMO to double
2x2 MIMO is a system with
send and receive more than one capacity (or even quadruple it, with
data stream (either one signal 4x4 MIMO). This can be an affordable
two source (transmitter) and
or multiple signals) over a given alternative to building out new sites to two destination (receiver)
channel—effectively multiplying increase capacity. antennas, theoretically
the capacity of that channel MIMO increases spectral efficiency,
doubling a channel’s
and vastly increasing network or how much traffic a network can throughput; 4x4 MIMO
performance. carry across a given set of frequencies. quadruples it
This improves the user experience and
increases customer satisfaction—making LTE Advanced supports
it one of the best features around. up to 8x8 MIMO
What are the challenges of MIMO in LTE networks?
The gains from MIMO described here are theoretical. In actual practice, By 2020, residential
MIMO performance is extremely sensitive to interference. A high signal-
to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) is critical to realizing full MIMO broadband requirements
benefits. A SINR greater than 20 dB is ideal, yielding performance and are expected to increase
QoS improvements approaching the theoretical limits. When SINR drops
to about 15 dB, these benefits virtually disappear. At a SINR of 10 or less, four-fold.
MIMO may even degrade performance compared to simpler transmission
modes like transmit diversity or SISO (single input single output) systems. (Understanding 5G:
Perspectives on future technological
Therefore, to realize MIMO’s full potential, interference (including PIM)
advancements in mobile, 2014)
must be kept at an absolute minimum—a goal that underpins many LTE best
practices in addition to MIMO. 67
#15 best practice: MIMO implementation

Equipment Environmental Installation


selection practices practices

• Use antennas with a high • With greater numbers of • Installation can be greatly
number of internal arrays to deployed antenna ports, it’s accelerated and simplified by
accommodate the greater particularly important that MIMO using a pre-assembled tower top
antenna count that comes with arrays and their connections are that can be pre-configured and
MIMO configurations. adequately weatherproofed. placed on the tower as a single
assembly.
• Remote electrical tilt (RET) • Since interference quickly drains
capability is desirable for MIMO benefits, ensure that any • PIM is a major source
antennas used in today’s LTE external interference is properly of performance-sapping
networks. mitigated. Use interference interference at cell sites. Ensure
mitigation filters (IMFs) if all connections are properly
• Select compact remote radio
necessary. torqued and sealed to reduce
units (RRUs) that are MIMO
PIM in the RF path.
compatible to maximize the • Be sure to purchase products
tower space available for that are specified and tested over • Effective PIM testing can help
antennas. the full range of environmental identify any potential problems
conditions appropriate to the in MIMO-upgraded sites,
• Beamforming is an essential part
location. particularly in the uplink path.
of efficient MIMO operation.
Insist on high-quality antennas • Mapping radios to antenna
that offer high performance ports is crucial in activating
patterns and product reliability the correct internal antenna
to get the most from your MIMO arrays, particularly when using
installation. multiband antennas.
68
15 best practice: MIMO implementation
#

Additional resources
White paper Blog Did you
Interleaved
MIMO
CommScope
definitions:
know?
What is MIMO “Massive MIMO” is an
emerging evolution that
uses 8x8 configurations
Learn more Learn more
(64 elements) or more
and may someday grow
to even hundreds or
White paper Blog thousands of antennas
(think 100x100!) to
further increase efficiency,
Distributed Strengthening reliability and throughput.
antenna systems the business
and MIMO case for MIMO 75 percent of the world’s
technology over DAS wireless data traffic will be
video by 2020.
Learn more Learn more
(Cisco VNI Mobile forecast,
February 2017)
69
LTE best practices: Conclusion

LTE: a new generation, a new set of rules


The LTE revolution comes with its own set of rules. Its increased complexity poses
new challenges for wireless operators all over the world—challenges including:
• Sharing sites with other technologies
• Increasing backhaul capacity Need to discuss
• Adapting to changes in tower-top architecture
• Eliminating interference and overcoming PIM best practices for your
These best practices cover the basics of these new rules and we sincerely hope you
have found them interesting and useful. However, there are other solutions and LTE network?
other strategies to discover that can help you build a better LTE network.
Wireless networks all over the world run on CommScope. As an industry leader
with decades of expertise and innovation, we design and build the solutions that
power LTE and other wireless technologies. We collaborate with operators around
the world to help them get optimal results from every investment. We invite you
to contact your CommScope representative to see how collaboration can help you
build a better LTE network—and a better business.

Contact us now.

70
Everyone communicates. It’s the essence
of the human experience. How we
communicate is evolving. Technology is
reshaping the way we live, learn and thrive.
The epicenter of this transformation is the
network—our passion. Our experts are
rethinking the purpose, role and usage of
networks to help our customers increase
bandwidth, expand capacity, enhance
efficiency, speed deployment and simplify
migration. From remote cell sites to massive
sports arenas, from busy airports to state-
of-the-art data centers—we provide the
essential expertise and vital infrastructure
your business needs to succeed. The
world’s most advanced networks rely on
CommScope connectivity.

www.commscope.com
Visit our website or contact your local CommScope representative for more information.

© 2017 CommScope, Inc. All rights reserved.


All trademarks identified by ® or ™ are registered trademarks or trademarks, respectively, of CommScope, Inc.
This document is for planning purposes only and is not intended to modify or supplement any specifications or warranties relating to CommScope products or services.
CO-108320.2-EN

Potrebbero piacerti anche