Introduction

Research is seen as the most important part of scientific inquiry and methodologies and its
empirical approach to the study of various social and natural phenomenon gives it an
unmatched position in today’s fast pace world and information based society. Key in every
research process is the formation, View, review and testing of hypothesis as well as
measuring the relationships between the variables in the hypothesis. This essay therefore
aims at discussing the general purpose and characteristics of research and providing a
justification of literature review in research. In an effort to achieve this task, the essay begins
with defining, as required, the terms research, hypothesis and variable. Furthermore, the
essay shall outline and discuss some of the general characteristics of research and justify the
role of literature review in research and a conclusion will then follow to sum up the essay’s
main arguments.

Definitions

Kay (2000) notes that the term research is a compound word, that is Re-Search where Re
means again and search means investigate hence search/investigate again. In this perspective
therefore, the underlying assumption is that there is something known about everything
however what is known may not be as true as it may appear hence the need to search again.
He defines research as a systematic collection, analysis (or collation) and interpretation of
data/information in order to answer a question or solve a problem. According to Cozby
(2009) it is a scientific method of inquiry where there is systematic process of data collection,
observation and description so as to explain, understand and predict a phenomenon. Patton,
(2002), argues that though often times research is mistaken for and used interchangeably with
investigation, he argues that research, especially fundamental or basic research, differs from
evaluation in that its primary purpose is to generate or test theory and contribute to
knowledge for the sake of knowledge. Research is based on the assumption that there is a
cause-effect relationship between two or more concepts called variables whose inter-
relationship is testable provable and predictable hence the goal of research being to be able
understand, explain and predict it (Kay 2000). Research therefore is a systematic process
implying that research is not an abrupt process but one which is logical and rational with
proper phases and processes hence the research process. Research is also an investigation of
cause-effect relationships between given sets of variables and involves processes of testing
and proving the inter-relations and their strengths and correlations. Further research aims at
three critical goals of understanding (identification of variables and their cause-effect
relationships), explaining (providing logical and coherent reasons for the existence of the
relationship), and predict (provide theoretical tunes which can be used to predict future
outcomes of the given relationships) (Kay 2000).

Research is as noted all about cause variable interactions and interrelations. But what then is
a variable? A variable is therefore seen as a factor affecting or affected by or in a
relationships hence takes up different values. Kay (2000) argues that a variable is also a
concept, which takes on different values. It is therefore synonymous to a concept or factor
which varies/changes/differs in a given relationship. Variables are therefore seen as the units
of measurements and investigation in scientific enquiry as theories, constructs and hypothesis
have interacting variables as their building blocks hence can be rightly put as building blocks
of knowledge and cause-effect relationships.

A hypothesis on the other hand as seen by Kay (2000) is A tentative explanation for an
observation, phenomenon, or scientific problem that can be tested by further investigation.
The term hypothesis is a derivative from the Greek word “hupothesis”, meaning to proposal,
supposition, and from “hupotithenai” where “hupothe”, Means to suppose and “tithenai”,
means to place hence a supposition, a tentative/standby explanation of a relationship or
phenomenon The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (2009). In research
therefore it explains the relationship between variables tentatively in a clear and testable
manner requiring proving. Often times hypothesis are taken for facts and facts for hypothesis,
this may often be confusing however it must be noted that facts and hypothesis are not
synonymous but relate such that a hypothesis is a proposition that attempts to explain a set of
facts in a unified way and generally forms the basis of experiments designed to establish its
plausibility hence facts are in the existence of a phenomenon while a hypothesis in testable
tentative explanation for the occurrence of the phenomenon.

It must be noted here that not all proposed explanations technically qualify to be called a
hypothesis as there are specific feature which qualify a supposition to be termed a hypothesis.
For a tentative or proposed explanation to be called a hypothesis it must firstly be clearly
formulated implying that the given variables concepts in the hypotheses should be clearly
identifiable and defined operationally. Secondly the hypotheses must be specific in that the
direction or the relationships between the given variables/concepts/factors is specified such
that the affected and affecting variables and how they affect each other is clearly distinct.
Thirdly it must be value free hence objectively giving that tentative explanation. Fourthly it
must be testable or subjectable to empirical research.

General purposes of research

Generally, as seen from the definition, research is aimed at objective analysis of a

phenomenon and is done in a quest to seek knowledge as an end in itself but also as a means
to an end. The specific aims and purposes of research are therefore as noted earlier to
describe, explain, prediction and understand social or natural phenomenon. Research further
aims at adding to existing knowledge, challenging the status quo, proving or disproving
commonly believed paradigmatic assumptions and information.

In terms of describing a research as noted by Kay (2000) has a general purpose of accurately
and precisely measuring and reporting of events and social phenomena, including its
characteristics and events. Hence the general purpose is to present facts and objectively as
well as accurately describe them. Research therefore gives information and facts hence the
single most important goal of research, the pursuit of knowledge.

Research also aims at, as already noted, explaining events and phenomenon. This thus
involves a process of investigation of causes underlying the existence of particular
phenomenon (Kay 2000). This implies that research does not only aim at giving information
accurately but also at given an explanation of the state of information that is, why the given
phenomenon exists as it does. The purpose is to provide inductive as well as deductive
explanations.

Explanation as a purpose of research is only as good as its ability to ensure accurate

predictions hence prediction as a general purpose and aim of research. Prediction here implies
forecasting and projections. Prediction is therefore the hallmark of research as theories are
seen as proven predictions while hypothesis as unproven predictions and constructs as
relational predictions.

Understanding (verstehen – Empathetic understanding) is amid the great aims of research it

ensures that the information is presented such that it can be understood, is non-subjective and
is value free.
Adding to existing knowledge is one other general purpose of research as we have argued
already that knowledge is an end in the research process. As explained above, research
involves a systematic process seeking, proving and even disproving information.

Challenging the status quo, hence the argued meaning of research as a re-investigation or
searching again. There are many sources of knowledge including mystical, intuitive, common
sense and authoritarian and the general purpose of the scientific inquiry through research is to
provide value free knowledge and challenge the paradigmatic assumptions of these other
forms of knowledge and their misconceptions.

General Characteristics of Research

As note by Kay as well as by Cozby, (2009) research has several charecteristics which
involve:

1. Systematic approaches

In conducting of research, there must be a follow up of systematic rules and procedures

which ensure objectivity in the process of research hence the research cycle and ethics.
Researchers operate on the ethics, rules or road map of making inferences, observations and
conclusions.

2. Logical approaches

Research is primarily logical and follows both deductive and inductive reasoning. Deductive
reasoning/logic as noted by The Webster legal dictionary involves a process of reasoning
from the general to the specific while Inductive logic/reasoning involves general. That is, you
start with specific instances to general.

3. Scientific method is empirical.

It means that data or knowledge is derived from reality. That is, from observations of
what actually exists.
4. Replicable
It means that another researcher conducting research should come up with more or
less the same research results of the other researchers using a research in similar
circumstances.
 5. Transmittable
Having taken research, the findings of research can be in a way that findings go
beyond the research. The research findings should be transmitted from the sample to
the whole population (generalized to the whole population – should be representative
of the larger population).
6. Reductive
When you think about research you must realize, that you are dealing with complex
situation(s). That is reality which is complex/infinite. You have to focus on realities –
things that concern us so that you make your research so physical. Focus on
something that you can manage.
7. Objective
Means removal of personal values and biases, away from unduly influences by
prejudices and values. It calls for suspension of beliefs. When conducting a research,
make your own reflection on the truth

The Role of Literature Review in Research

Boote & Beile (2005) define a literature review as an evaluative report of studies found in the
literature related to a selected area. They further reveal that the literature review goes beyond
the search for information and includes the identification and articulation of relationships
between the literature and your field of research. Given the above stated definitions of
research, a literature helps reinvestigate available information, review the findings, the
theories and review of empirical research. A literature review therefore helps:

1. Prevent duplication of what has already been done as well as plagiarism

The literature review helps the researcher know what has been done, how it has been done
and why such that one can be able to find discrepancies or gaps which can filled by the
research conducted. Furthermore, one can credit to themselves findings which have already
been accredited to others hence find themselves plagiarising other people’s works which is
criminal and ignorance is no excuse.

2. It helps in finding out what others have done and reported on the topic

This is critical because methods which failed approaches which didn’t work and areas not
feasible can be noted and avoided beforehand. The reports help build up better approaches to
one’s research.
 3. Literature review justifies your research

It provides you with convincing arguments on why the research should be undertaken this
is because assumptions and hypothesis created by other research can be reviewed as well
as the strengths and weaknesses of the existing research works done which will provide
justifications for further research needed to be done.

4. generate new original ideas

From the literature review one is able to create new ideas, approaches and
methodologies in the conduct of the research.

Conclusion

Research therefore is critical, dynamic and systematic process of scientific investigation

involving study of variables in their hypothetic relationships to provide new information,
bridge gaps and ensure that a phenomenon is understood, explained, described and predicted.
It involves collection of both primary and secondary data where primary data is collected
through surveys and secondary data through literature review which has a critical part to
ensure originality, justifying the research, avoidance of plagiarism and duplication.
Bibliography

Boote, D.N. & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the
dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher 34/6, 3-15.

Cozby, P.C., (2009). Methods in behavioural research, 10th Ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

The American Heritage, Dictionary of the English Language (2009), Published by Houghton
Mifflin Company.

Kay M, D., (2000) Research Methods in the Social Sciences: Social Research Methods, Data
Exchange Centre. D.E.C.